Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.politics.misc > #738933 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-20 10:14 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-05-23 16:55 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 30 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to uk.politics.misc
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Squatter can keep £400k house Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-20 10:14 +0100
Re: Squatter can keep £400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-20 11:20 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-22 13:40 +0100
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-22 14:47 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-22 17:04 +0100
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am> - 2016-05-22 17:10 +0100
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-22 18:17 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-22 17:30 +0100
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-22 18:38 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-22 22:52 +0100
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-23 00:02 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house saracene <john.jsm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 15:11 -0700
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-23 00:17 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-23 07:39 +0100
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-23 14:56 +0100
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-23 16:52 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-23 17:12 +0100
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-23 23:18 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-25 09:34 +0100
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-25 11:50 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house JNugent <jenningsltd@fastmail.fm> - 2016-05-22 21:45 +0100
Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-22 18:16 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep £400k house saracene <john.jsm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 15:08 -0700
Re: Squatter can keep £400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-23 00:25 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep £400k house saracene <john.jsm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 23:36 -0700
Re: Squatter can keep £400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-23 11:59 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep £400k house saracene <john.jsm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 03:01 -0700
Re: Squatter can keep £400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-23 13:23 +0200
Re: Squatter can keep £400k house saracene <john.jsm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 05:57 -0700
Re: Squatter can keep £400k house abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-23 16:55 +0200
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-20 10:14 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep £400k house |
| Message-ID | <v4131d-966.ln1@server.com.il> |
GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.com> wrote: > On 20/05/2016 00:47, JNugent wrote: >> Today, what the illegal occupant did would be a crime. >> >> As far as normal people are concerned it was a crime all along. It just >> wasn't illegal. > I think I am normal, but I do not agree with the change in the law that > makes it illegal to squat in abandoned property, just because it has a > residential element to it. Of course, there should be a ban on squatting > in property that has not been abandoned, but I think it is actually > shameful for a house to be left unoccupied for such a long period of time > as this one was. Rightards have no 'shame' and only two obsessions: money and property. Theirs. Or others', when they get to take it off them and call it 'business'. Y. -- Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein 'I can calculate the motions of the heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people' (Sir Isaac Newton (1643 - 1727)) <http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-20 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tjltjb1lt670i8m28uhm3gged077mi8ec0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #738933 |
On Fri, 20 May 2016 10:14:39 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.com> wrote: >> On 20/05/2016 00:47, JNugent wrote: > >>> Today, what the illegal occupant did would be a crime. >>> >>> As far as normal people are concerned it was a crime all along. It just >>> wasn't illegal. > >> I think I am normal, but I do not agree with the change in the law that >> makes it illegal to squat in abandoned property, just because it has a >> residential element to it. Of course, there should be a ban on squatting >> in property that has not been abandoned, but I think it is actually >> shameful for a house to be left unoccupied for such a long period of time >> as this one was. > >Rightards have no 'shame' and only two obsessions: money and property. >Theirs. Or others', when they get to take it off them and call it >'business'. almost all squatting is done by avowed members of your cult is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? -- www.abelard.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-22 13:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <5vl81d-uak.ln1@server.com.il> |
| In reply to | #738937 |
In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2016 10:14:39 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein > <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.com> wrote: >>> On 20/05/2016 00:47, JNugent wrote: >>>> Today, what the illegal occupant did would be a crime. >>>> >>>> As far as normal people are concerned it was a crime all along. It >>>> just wasn't illegal. >> >>> I think I am normal, but I do not agree with the change in the law that >>> makes it illegal to squat in abandoned property, just because it has a >>> residential element to it. Of course, there should be a ban on >>> squatting in property that has not been abandoned, but I think it is >>> actually shameful for a house to be left unoccupied for such a long >>> period of time as this one was. >> >>Rightards have no 'shame' and only two obsessions: money and property. >>Theirs. Or others', when they get to take it off them and call it >>'business'. > almost all squatting is done by avowed members of your cult And almost all misappropriation of others' property is done by avowed members of the Cult of the Market. > is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? Just taking back what is ours, son. Too bad if that displeases you. Y. -- Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein 'I approve of anybody who commits such acts of violence. Really, I don't think that we can sit back and watch Arabs throwing rocks at buses whenever they feel like it. They must understand that a bomb thrown at a Jewish bus is going to mean a bomb thrown at an Arab bus...' (Meir Kahane (1932 - 1990)) <http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/> <http://thereligionofpeace.com/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-22 14:47 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <6ga3kb1q30le5op9bits8up5shc6r97fmu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #739269 |
On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
<yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 May 2016 10:14:39 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>>GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>> On 20/05/2016 00:47, JNugent wrote:
>
>>>>> Today, what the illegal occupant did would be a crime.
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as normal people are concerned it was a crime all along. It
>>>>> just wasn't illegal.
>>>
>>>> I think I am normal, but I do not agree with the change in the law that
>>>> makes it illegal to squat in abandoned property, just because it has a
>>>> residential element to it. Of course, there should be a ban on
>>>> squatting in property that has not been abandoned, but I think it is
>>>> actually shameful for a house to be left unoccupied for such a long
>>>> period of time as this one was.
>>>
>>>Rightards have no 'shame' and only two obsessions: money and property.
>>>Theirs. Or others', when they get to take it off them and call it
>>>'business'.
>
>> almost all squatting is done by avowed members of your cult
>
>And almost all misappropriation of others' property is done by avowed
>members of the Cult of the Market.
>
>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal?
>
>Just taking back what is ours, son.
how did it get to be yours??
>Too bad if that displeases you.
please stop attributing attitudes to me that i don't have...
doing that is called 'dishonesty'...i do realise they will drum you
out of the cult and burn your membership card if you don't
reach your target number of lies in any one month...
but don't imagine i won't notice...
--
www.abelard.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-22 17:04 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il> |
| In reply to | #739272 |
In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein > <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 May 2016 10:14:39 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>>GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.com> wrote: >>>>> On 20/05/2016 00:47, JNugent wrote: >>>>>> Today, what the illegal occupant did would be a crime. >>>>>> >>>>>> As far as normal people are concerned it was a crime all along. It >>>>>> just wasn't illegal. >>>>> I think I am normal, but I do not agree with the change in the law >>>>> that makes it illegal to squat in abandoned property, just because it >>>>> has a residential element to it. Of course, there should be a ban on >>>>> squatting in property that has not been abandoned, but I think it is >>>>> actually shameful for a house to be left unoccupied for such a long >>>>> period of time as this one was. >>>>Rightards have no 'shame' and only two obsessions: money and property. >>>>Theirs. Or others', when they get to take it off them and call it >>>>'business'. >>> almost all squatting is done by avowed members of your cult >>And almost all misappropriation of others' property is done by avowed >>members of the Cult of the Market. >>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? >>Just taking back what is ours, son. > how did it get to be yours?? It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you stupid Tory runt. Y. -- Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein 'I approve of anybody who commits such acts of violence. Really, I don't think that we can sit back and watch Arabs throwing rocks at buses whenever they feel like it. They must understand that a bomb thrown at a Jewish bus is going to mean a bomb thrown at an Arab bus...' (Meir Kahane (1932 - 1990)) <http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/> <http://thereligionofpeace.com/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-22 17:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <dqe40rFfq6aU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #739302 |
"Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il... > In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? > >>>Just taking back what is ours, son. > >> how did it get to be yours?? > > It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you stupid > Tory runt. Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of 'ownership' yet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-22 18:17 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <5rm3kbd6i7kagv1hkks0qqm2up9r0udt9j@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #739305 |
On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am> wrote: >"Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message >news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il... >> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>>In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: > >>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? >> >>>>Just taking back what is ours, son. >> >>> how did it get to be yours?? >> >> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you stupid >> Tory runt. > >Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of 'ownership' yet. give him time... he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary yet... -- www.abelard.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-22 17:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <r8l0z.1078822$UG.668527@fx38.am4> |
| In reply to | #739310 |
On 22/05/2016 17:17, abelard wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am> > wrote: > >> "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message >> news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il... >>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >> >>>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? >>> >>>>> Just taking back what is ours, son. >>> >>>> how did it get to be yours?? >>> >>> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you stupid >>> Tory runt. >> >> Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of 'ownership' yet. > > give him time... > he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary yet... Give him a chance to steal one... :) > > -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-22 18:38 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <dqn3kbhp1alcbs6ojhei7gp5q2te1fpaem@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #739313 |
On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:30:09 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>On 22/05/2016 17:17, abelard wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
>>> news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il...
>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
>>>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal?
>>>>
>>>>>> Just taking back what is ours, son.
>>>>
>>>>> how did it get to be yours??
>>>>
>>>> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you stupid
>>>> Tory runt.
>>>
>>> Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of 'ownership' yet.
>>
>> give him time...
>> he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary yet...
>
>Give him a chance to steal one... :)
it would only be recovering what someone else didn't steal from him...
i don't know if i've got the socialist ethic correct there
perhaps it is a variety of proudhonism...all property is theft
...except when a socialist grabs it...
--
www.abelard.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-22 22:52 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <1am91d-lim.ln1@server.com.il> |
| In reply to | #739314 |
In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:30:09 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: >>On 22/05/2016 17:17, abelard wrote: >>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am> >>> wrote: >>>> "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message >>>> news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il... >>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >>>>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? >>>>>>> Just taking back what is ours, son. >>>>>> how did it get to be yours?? >>>>> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you >>>>> stupid Tory runt. >>>> Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of >>>> 'ownership' yet. >>> give him time... he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary yet... >>Give him a chance to steal one... :) > it would only be recovering what someone else didn't steal from him... > > i don't know if i've got the socialist ethic correct there > > perhaps it is a variety of proudhonism...all property is theft ...except > when a socialist grabs it... Hahaha... priceless... three tory runts standing in a circle with their cock in their hands.. Y. -- Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein 'I approve of anybody who commits such acts of violence. Really, I don't think that we can sit back and watch Arabs throwing rocks at buses whenever they feel like it. They must understand that a bomb thrown at a Jewish bus is going to mean a bomb thrown at an Arab bus...' (Meir Kahane (1932 - 1990)) <http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/> <http://thereligionofpeace.com/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-23 00:02 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <cua4kbd7vbpgpku27slj14da44r860bjik@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #739352 |
On Sun, 22 May 2016 22:52:33 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
<yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:30:09 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>On 22/05/2016 17:17, abelard wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
>>>>> news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il...
>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
>>>>>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal?
>
>>>>>>>> Just taking back what is ours, son.
>
>>>>>>> how did it get to be yours??
>
>>>>>> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you
>>>>>> stupid Tory runt.
>
>>>>> Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of
>>>>> 'ownership' yet.
>
>>>> give him time... he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary yet...
>
>>>Give him a chance to steal one... :)
>
>> it would only be recovering what someone else didn't steal from him...
>>
>> i don't know if i've got the socialist ethic correct there
>>
>> perhaps it is a variety of proudhonism...all property is theft ...except
>> when a socialist grabs it...
>
>Hahaha... priceless... three tory runts standing in a circle with their
>cock in their hands..
a miracle...you've moved from bottoms to fronts...
or have you become so confused that you are back to front
as well as upside down
now you've matured a major step...which one of us do you want most?
--
www.abelard.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | saracene <john.jsm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-22 15:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <07e11d28-d948-4cda-8fe6-022be178957d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #739356 |
On Sunday, May 22, 2016 at 11:02:08 PM UTC+1, abelard wrote: > > a miracle...you've moved from bottoms to fronts... > He is referring to an American practice called a circle jerk. It's a form of male bonding.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-23 00:17 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <rsb4kbt1814jeam0tpqbtar83eobslgm5l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #739358 |
On Sun, 22 May 2016 15:11:14 -0700 (PDT), saracene <john.jsm@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sunday, May 22, 2016 at 11:02:08 PM UTC+1, abelard wrote: >> a miracle...you've moved from bottoms to fronts... >> >He is referring to an American practice called a circle jerk. It's a form of male bonding. then why is he hiding his, is it because it's atrophied? is he american? -- www.abelard.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-23 07:39 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <YAx0z.1295139$2u3.191706@fx35.am4> |
| In reply to | #739352 |
On 22/05/2016 22:52, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein wrote: > In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:30:09 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> >> wrote: >>> On 22/05/2016 17:17, abelard wrote: >>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am> >>>> wrote: >>>>> "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message >>>>> news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il... >>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >>>>>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? > >>>>>>>> Just taking back what is ours, son. > >>>>>>> how did it get to be yours?? > >>>>>> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you >>>>>> stupid Tory runt. > >>>>> Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of >>>>> 'ownership' yet. > >>>> give him time... he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary yet... > >>> Give him a chance to steal one... :) > >> it would only be recovering what someone else didn't steal from him... >> >> i don't know if i've got the socialist ethic correct there >> >> perhaps it is a variety of proudhonism...all property is theft ...except >> when a socialist grabs it... > > Hahaha... priceless... three tory runts standing in a circle with their > cock in their hands.. I hope your not insulting me by calling me a Tory? -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-23 14:56 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <soeb1d-rhq.ln1@server.com.il> |
| In reply to | #739381 |
In uk.politics.misc Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On 22/05/2016 22:52, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein wrote: >> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:30:09 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>>> On 22/05/2016 17:17, abelard wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message >>>>>> news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il... >>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >>>>>>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? >> >>>>>>>>> Just taking back what is ours, son. >> >>>>>>>> how did it get to be yours?? >> >>>>>>> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you >>>>>>> stupid Tory runt. >> >>>>>> Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of >>>>>> 'ownership' yet. >> >>>>> give him time... he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary yet... >> >>>> Give him a chance to steal one... :) >> >>> it would only be recovering what someone else didn't steal from him... >>> >>> i don't know if i've got the socialist ethic correct there >>> >>> perhaps it is a variety of proudhonism...all property is theft ...except >>> when a socialist grabs it... >> >> Hahaha... priceless... three tory runts standing in a circle with their >> cock in their hands.. > > I hope your not insulting me by calling me a Tory? And you're too thick even to know your own politics. I wonder which way you're voting in the 'Wogs Out' Referendum. Oh, wait... Y. -- Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein 'I approve of anybody who commits such acts of violence. Really, I don't think that we can sit back and watch Arabs throwing rocks at buses whenever they feel like it. They must understand that a bomb thrown at a Jewish bus is going to mean a bomb thrown at an Arab bus...' (Meir Kahane (1932 - 1990)) <http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/> <http://thereligionofpeace.com/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-23 16:52 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <5466kbha3rgsmoornikn8luuo0ibpr8u0q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #739432 |
On Mon, 23 May 2016 14:56:12 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >In uk.politics.misc Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> On 22/05/2016 22:52, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein wrote: >>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:30:09 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 22/05/2016 17:17, abelard wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il... >>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >>>>>>>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? >>> >>>>>>>>>> Just taking back what is ours, son. >>> >>>>>>>>> how did it get to be yours?? >>> >>>>>>>> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you >>>>>>>> stupid Tory runt. >>> >>>>>>> Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of >>>>>>> 'ownership' yet. >>> >>>>>> give him time... he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary yet... >>> >>>>> Give him a chance to steal one... :) >>> >>>> it would only be recovering what someone else didn't steal from him... >>>> >>>> i don't know if i've got the socialist ethic correct there >>>> >>>> perhaps it is a variety of proudhonism...all property is theft ...except >>>> when a socialist grabs it... >>> >>> Hahaha... priceless... three tory runts standing in a circle with their >>> cock in their hands.. >> >> I hope your not insulting me by calling me a Tory? > >And you're too thick even to know your own politics. > >I wonder which way you're voting in the 'Wogs Out' Referendum. > >Oh, wait... tories tend to want cheap labour... it is the thickos who hate the competition... fascist 'new politics' labour is owned by the unions... and you dare to claim that others don't know politics oh, i forget, they're not real(tm) socialists -- www.abelard.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-23 17:12 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <5pmb1d-g6r.ln1@server.com.il> |
| In reply to | #739439 |
In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2016 14:56:12 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein > <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: > >>In uk.politics.misc Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>> On 22/05/2016 22:52, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein wrote: >>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:30:09 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 22/05/2016 17:17, abelard wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il... >>>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >>>>>>>>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just taking back what is ours, son. >>>> >>>>>>>>>> how did it get to be yours?? >>>> >>>>>>>>> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you >>>>>>>>> stupid Tory runt. >>>> >>>>>>>> Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of >>>>>>>> 'ownership' yet. >>>> >>>>>>> give him time... he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary yet... >>>> >>>>>> Give him a chance to steal one... :) >>>> >>>>> it would only be recovering what someone else didn't steal from him... >>>>> >>>>> i don't know if i've got the socialist ethic correct there >>>>> >>>>> perhaps it is a variety of proudhonism...all property is theft ...except >>>>> when a socialist grabs it... >>>> >>>> Hahaha... priceless... three tory runts standing in a circle with their >>>> cock in their hands.. >>> >>> I hope your not insulting me by calling me a Tory? >> >>And you're too thick even to know your own politics. >> >>I wonder which way you're voting in the 'Wogs Out' Referendum. >> >>Oh, wait... > > tories tend to want cheap labour... > > it is the thickos who hate the competition... > > fascist 'new politics' labour is owned by the unions... Ah, the 'fascist labour' one, eh? Let's revisit this ... 'Fascism. a. Usu. with capital initial. A nationalist political movement that controlled the government of Italy from 1922 to 1943 under the leadership of Benito Mussolini (1883-1945); the principles or ideology of the fascisti (fascista n. 1a). See also fascist n. 1a, Fascismo n., and cf. sense 1b. Now hist. b. gen. An authoritarian and nationalistic system of government and social organization which emerged after the end of the First World War in 1918, and became a prominent force in European politics during the 1920s and 1930s, most notably in Italy and Germany; (later also) an extreme right-wing political ideology based on the principles underlying this system. Freq. with capital initial. Cf. fascist n. 1b. 2. In extended use (depreciative). a. Any form of behaviour perceived as autocratic, intolerant, or oppressive; esp. the advocacy of a particular viewpoint or practice in a manner that seeks to enforce conformity. Cf. fascist n. 2a b. With modifying word, specifying the particular aspect of life or sphere of activity concerned. Cf. fascist n. 2b.' (Oxford English Dictionary online (accessed 09 February 2016) Regale us all with examples of when New Labour initiated 'authoritarian and nationalistic' policies, Idiotboi. We need the laugh. Y. -- Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein 'I approve of anybody who commits such acts of violence. Really, I don't think that we can sit back and watch Arabs throwing rocks at buses whenever they feel like it. They must understand that a bomb thrown at a Jewish bus is going to mean a bomb thrown at an Arab bus...' (Meir Kahane (1932 - 1990)) <http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/> <http://thereligionofpeace.com/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-23 23:18 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <2ts6kblj8pa83os7u0v6etcr5jgivahlpd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #739458 |
On Mon, 23 May 2016 17:12:53 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >> On Mon, 23 May 2016 14:56:12 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >> >>>In uk.politics.misc Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>> On 22/05/2016 22:52, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein wrote: >>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:30:09 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 22/05/2016 17:17, abelard wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il... >>>>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >>>>>>>>>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just taking back what is ours, son. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> how did it get to be yours?? >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft 'business', you >>>>>>>>>> stupid Tory runt. >>>>> >>>>>>>>> Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of >>>>>>>>> 'ownership' yet. >>>>> >>>>>>>> give him time... he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary yet... >>>>> >>>>>>> Give him a chance to steal one... :) >>>>> >>>>>> it would only be recovering what someone else didn't steal from him... >>>>>> >>>>>> i don't know if i've got the socialist ethic correct there >>>>>> >>>>>> perhaps it is a variety of proudhonism...all property is theft ...except >>>>>> when a socialist grabs it... >>>>> >>>>> Hahaha... priceless... three tory runts standing in a circle with their >>>>> cock in their hands.. >>>> >>>> I hope your not insulting me by calling me a Tory? >>> >>>And you're too thick even to know your own politics. >>> >>>I wonder which way you're voting in the 'Wogs Out' Referendum. >>> >>>Oh, wait... >> >> tories tend to want cheap labour... >> >> it is the thickos who hate the competition... >> >> fascist 'new politics' labour is owned by the unions... > >Ah, the 'fascist labour' one, eh? > >Let's revisit this ... > > 'Fascism. > > a. Usu. with capital initial. A nationalist political movement that > controlled the government of Italy from 1922 to 1943 under the > leadership of Benito Mussolini (1883-1945); the principles or ideology > of the fascisti (fascista n. 1a). See also fascist n. 1a, Fascismo n., > and cf. sense 1b. Now hist. > > b. gen. An authoritarian and nationalistic system of government and > social organization which emerged after the end of the First World War > in 1918, and became a prominent force in European politics during the > 1920s and 1930s, most notably in Italy and Germany; (later also) an > extreme right-wing political ideology based on the principles > underlying this system. Freq. with capital initial. Cf. fascist n. 1b. > > 2. In extended use (depreciative). a. Any form of behaviour perceived > as autocratic, intolerant, or oppressive; esp. the advocacy of a > particular viewpoint or practice in a manner that seeks to enforce > conformity. Cf. fascist n. 2a > > b. With modifying word, specifying the particular aspect of life or > sphere of activity concerned. Cf. fascist n. 2b.' > (Oxford English Dictionary online (accessed 09 February 2016) > >Regale us all with examples of when New Labour initiated 'authoritarian and >nationalistic' policies, Idiotboi. > >We need the laugh. do some work for yourself -- www.abelard.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-25 09:34 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <sk4g1d-kn4.ln1@server.com.il> |
| In reply to | #739493 |
In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2016 17:12:53 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein > <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>> On Mon, 23 May 2016 14:56:12 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>>In uk.politics.misc Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>>>> On 22/05/2016 22:52, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein wrote: >>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:30:09 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 22/05/2016 17:17, abelard wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il... >>>>>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein >>>>>>>>>>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal? >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just taking back what is ours, son. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> how did it get to be yours?? >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft >>>>>>>>>>> 'business', you stupid Tory runt. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of >>>>>>>>>> 'ownership' yet. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> give him time... he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary >>>>>>>>> yet... >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Give him a chance to steal one... :) >>>>>> >>>>>>> it would only be recovering what someone else didn't steal from >>>>>>> him... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i don't know if i've got the socialist ethic correct there >>>>>>> >>>>>>> perhaps it is a variety of proudhonism...all property is theft >>>>>>> ...except when a socialist grabs it... >>>>>> >>>>>> Hahaha... priceless... three tory runts standing in a circle with >>>>>> their cock in their hands.. >>>>> >>>>> I hope your not insulting me by calling me a Tory? >>>> >>>>And you're too thick even to know your own politics. >>>> >>>>I wonder which way you're voting in the 'Wogs Out' Referendum. >>>> >>>>Oh, wait... >>> >>> tories tend to want cheap labour... >>> >>> it is the thickos who hate the competition... >>> >>> fascist 'new politics' labour is owned by the unions... >> >>Ah, the 'fascist labour' one, eh? >> >>Let's revisit this ... >> >> 'Fascism. >> >> a. Usu. with capital initial. A nationalist political movement >> that controlled the government of Italy from 1922 to 1943 under >> the leadership of Benito Mussolini (1883-1945); the principles or >> ideology of the fascisti (fascista n. 1a). See also fascist n. 1a, >> Fascismo n., and cf. sense 1b. Now hist. >> >> b. gen. An authoritarian and nationalistic system of government >> and social organization which emerged after the end of the First >> World War in 1918, and became a prominent force in European >> politics during the 1920s and 1930s, most notably in Italy and >> Germany; (later also) an extreme right-wing political ideology >> based on the principles underlying this system. Freq. with capital >> initial. Cf. fascist n. 1b. >> >> 2. In extended use (depreciative). a. Any form of behaviour >> perceived as autocratic, intolerant, or oppressive; esp. the >> advocacy of a particular viewpoint or practice in a manner that >> seeks to enforce conformity. Cf. fascist n. 2a >> >> b. With modifying word, specifying the particular aspect of life >> or sphere of activity concerned. Cf. fascist n. 2b.' (Oxford >> English Dictionary online (accessed 09 February 2016) >> >>Regale us all with examples of when New Labour initiated 'authoritarian >>and nationalistic' policies, Idiotboi. >> >>We need the laugh. > do some work for yourself Back of the net. Next ! Y. -- Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein 'I approve of anybody who commits such acts of violence. Really, I don't think that we can sit back and watch Arabs throwing rocks at buses whenever they feel like it. They must understand that a bomb thrown at a Jewish bus is going to mean a bomb thrown at an Arab bus...' (Meir Kahane (1932 - 1990)) <http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/> <http://thereligionofpeace.com/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-25 11:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Squatter can keep ?400k house |
| Message-ID | <h9takbl7aqh0uasbr7b3r5sqivrlq3irkc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #739695 |
On Wed, 25 May 2016 09:34:04 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
<yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 May 2016 17:12:53 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>>In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 23 May 2016 14:56:12 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
>>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>>>>In uk.politics.misc Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> On 22/05/2016 22:52, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein wrote:
>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:30:09 +0100, Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 22/05/2016 17:17, abelard wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:10:07 +0100, "Norman Wells" <hex@unseen.ac.am>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein" <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:bt191d-h5l.ln1@server.com.il...
>>>>>>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:40:37 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In uk.politics.misc abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there anything you don't believe you have right to steal?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just taking back what is ours, son.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> how did it get to be yours??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It was ours before you stole it and called the theft
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'business', you stupid Tory runt.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Somehow, I don't think you've quite grasped the legal concept of
>>>>>>>>>>> 'ownership' yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> give him time... he hasn't looked it up in his cheap dictionary
>>>>>>>>>> yet...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Give him a chance to steal one... :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it would only be recovering what someone else didn't steal from
>>>>>>>> him...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i don't know if i've got the socialist ethic correct there
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> perhaps it is a variety of proudhonism...all property is theft
>>>>>>>> ...except when a socialist grabs it...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hahaha... priceless... three tory runts standing in a circle with
>>>>>>> their cock in their hands..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope your not insulting me by calling me a Tory?
>>>>>
>>>>>And you're too thick even to know your own politics.
>>>>>
>>>>>I wonder which way you're voting in the 'Wogs Out' Referendum.
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh, wait...
>>>>
>>>> tories tend to want cheap labour...
>>>>
>>>> it is the thickos who hate the competition...
>>>>
>>>> fascist 'new politics' labour is owned by the unions...
>>>
>>>Ah, the 'fascist labour' one, eh?
>>>
>>>Let's revisit this ...
>>>
>>> 'Fascism.
>>>
>>> a. Usu. with capital initial. A nationalist political movement
>>> that controlled the government of Italy from 1922 to 1943 under
>>> the leadership of Benito Mussolini (1883-1945); the principles or
>>> ideology of the fascisti (fascista n. 1a). See also fascist n. 1a,
>>> Fascismo n., and cf. sense 1b. Now hist.
>>>
>>> b. gen. An authoritarian and nationalistic system of government
>>> and social organization which emerged after the end of the First
>>> World War in 1918, and became a prominent force in European
>>> politics during the 1920s and 1930s, most notably in Italy and
>>> Germany; (later also) an extreme right-wing political ideology
>>> based on the principles underlying this system. Freq. with capital
>>> initial. Cf. fascist n. 1b.
>>>
>>> 2. In extended use (depreciative). a. Any form of behaviour
>>> perceived as autocratic, intolerant, or oppressive; esp. the
>>> advocacy of a particular viewpoint or practice in a manner that
>>> seeks to enforce conformity. Cf. fascist n. 2a
>>>
>>> b. With modifying word, specifying the particular aspect of life
>>> or sphere of activity concerned. Cf. fascist n. 2b.' (Oxford
>>> English Dictionary online (accessed 09 February 2016)
>>>
>>>Regale us all with examples of when New Labour initiated 'authoritarian
>>>and nationalistic' policies, Idiotboi.
>>>
>>>We need the laugh.
>
>> do some work for yourself
>
>Back of the net.
>
>Next !
next is when you've done some homework and stop repeating
your errors
--
www.abelard.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | uk.politics.misc
csiph-web