Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > uk.politics.misc > #738655 > unrolled thread

the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish

Back to article view | Back to uk.politics.misc

Contents

  the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Harold Davis <this@is.not.a.real.email.address.invalid> - 2016-05-19 10:11 +0000
    Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Harold Davis <this@is.not.a.real.email.address.invalid> - 2016-05-19 10:27 +0000
      Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-19 12:33 +0200
        Re: the "unnameable"... Vidcapper <vidcapper1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-19 14:54 +0100
    Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> - 2016-05-19 11:37 +0100
      Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish lawrence13@sky.com - 2016-05-22 03:56 -0700
    Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-19 13:08 +0100
      Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-19 14:24 +0200
    Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Norman Rowling <geegaaxx@virgin.net> - 2016-05-19 14:30 +0100
      Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish frederick <fakeemail@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 12:01 +0100
        Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Harold Davis <this@is.not.a.real.email.address.invalid> - 2016-05-20 11:47 +0000
          Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "anorak" <ssos@meet_the_inbred.com> - 2016-05-20 07:01 -0500
            Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish JNugent <jenningsltd@fastmail.fm> - 2016-05-20 20:56 +0100
              Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-21 13:57 +0200
                Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "Sid." <a.89396@ymail.com> - 2016-05-21 13:01 +0100
                  Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-21 14:06 +0200
                    Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "Sid." <a.89396@ymail.com> - 2016-05-21 13:12 +0100
              Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish frederick <fakeemail@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 15:11 +0100
                Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish JNugent <jenningsltd@fastmail.fm> - 2016-05-22 22:31 +0100
    Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Barclay Weir <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-05-19 16:33 +0100
      Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> - 2016-05-19 17:53 +0100
        Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "Ophelia" <OphElsinore@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 18:13 +0100
          Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> - 2016-05-19 22:11 +0100
            Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "Ophelia" <OphElsinore@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 10:44 +0100
              Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> - 2016-05-20 11:38 +0100
                Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "Ophelia" <OphElsinore@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 15:02 +0100
      Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "Ophelia" <OphElsinore@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 18:11 +0100
      Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Harold Davis <this@is.not.a.real.email.address.invalid> - 2016-05-19 18:45 +0000
      Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Juan Carr <juan.carr@gmx.com> - 2016-05-19 19:57 +0100
        Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Barclay Weir <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-05-19 20:40 +0100
        Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-20 10:19 +0200
          Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-20 10:06 +0100
            Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-20 11:15 +0200
              Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-22 17:09 +0100
                Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-22 18:14 +0200
                Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Oswald <oswald.kripp@yahoo.ne> - 2016-05-22 15:54 -0400
            Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Harold Davis <this@is.not.a.real.email.address.invalid> - 2016-05-20 11:44 +0000
              Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish "anorak" <ssos@meet_the_inbred.com> - 2016-05-20 06:57 -0500
              Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-22 13:35 +0100
                Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-22 14:49 +0200
                  Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> - 2016-05-22 22:51 +0100
                    Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> - 2016-05-23 00:35 +0200
    Re: the "unnameable" Elton John and David Furnish lawrence13@sky.com - 2016-05-22 03:56 -0700

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#738753

Barclay Weir wrote:
> On 19/05/16 11:11, Harold Davis wrote:
>> Have the newspapers been told not to say that the "married couple" are
>> both
>> male?
>>
>> Every report I've read refers to "PJS" (David Furnish) having "young
>> children" with his "spouse" "YMA" (Elton John), without saying that his
>> "spouse" is another man.
>>
>
> You have named the "unnameable". Do you live abroad? See Ophelia's
> question in an earlier thread. If you live in England, are you awaiting
> a visit from the authorities? - or from PJS/YMA heavies? Ooops! there
> I've (nearly) gone and done it too!

You didn't snip before replying, so yes, you did.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738759

"Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> wrote in message 
news:nhkqr7$cuv$1@dont-email.me...
> Barclay Weir wrote:
>> On 19/05/16 11:11, Harold Davis wrote:
>>> Have the newspapers been told not to say that the "married couple" are
>>> both
>>> male?
>>>
>>> Every report I've read refers to "PJS" (David Furnish) having "young
>>> children" with his "spouse" "YMA" (Elton John), without saying that his
>>> "spouse" is another man.
>>>
>>
>> You have named the "unnameable". Do you live abroad? See Ophelia's
>> question in an earlier thread. If you live in England, are you awaiting
>> a visit from the authorities? - or from PJS/YMA heavies? Ooops! there
>> I've (nearly) gone and done it too!
>
> You didn't snip before replying, so yes, you did.

Phew well at least I am in Scotland as (given his name) might Barclay.

Umm you didn't snip it either ...



-- 
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738818

Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> wrote in message
> news:nhkqr7$cuv$1@dont-email.me...
>> Barclay Weir wrote:
>>> On 19/05/16 11:11, Harold Davis wrote:
>>>> Have the newspapers been told not to say that the "married couple" are
>>>> both
>>>> male?
>>>>
>>>> Every report I've read refers to "PJS" (David Furnish) having "young
>>>> children" with his "spouse" "YMA" (Elton John), without saying that his
>>>> "spouse" is another man.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You have named the "unnameable". Do you live abroad? See Ophelia's
>>> question in an earlier thread. If you live in England, are you awaiting
>>> a visit from the authorities? - or from PJS/YMA heavies? Ooops! there
>>> I've (nearly) gone and done it too!
>>
>> You didn't snip before replying, so yes, you did.
>
> Phew well at least I am in Scotland as (given his name) might Barclay.
>
> Umm you didn't snip it either ...
>

Well, I don't care :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738946

"Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> wrote in message
news:nhl9uo$938$1@dont-email.me...
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> wrote in message
>> news:nhkqr7$cuv$1@dont-email.me...
>>> Barclay Weir wrote:
>>>> On 19/05/16 11:11, Harold Davis wrote:
>>>>> Have the newspapers been told not to say that the "married couple" are
>>>>> both
>>>>> male?
>>>>>
>>>>> Every report I've read refers to "PJS" (David Furnish) having "young
>>>>> children" with his "spouse" "YMA" (Elton John), without saying that
>>>>> his
>>>>> "spouse" is another man.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You have named the "unnameable". Do you live abroad? See Ophelia's
>>>> question in an earlier thread. If you live in England, are you awaiting
>>>> a visit from the authorities? - or from PJS/YMA heavies? Ooops! there
>>>> I've (nearly) gone and done it too!
>>>
>>> You didn't snip before replying, so yes, you did.
>>
>> Phew well at least I am in Scotland as (given his name) might Barclay.
>>
>> Umm you didn't snip it either ...
>>
>
> Well, I don't care :-)

Oooooooooohhhh :)

If he ever gets a peerage, will t'other one be Lady thingy?




-- 
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738957

Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> wrote in message
> news:nhl9uo$938$1@dont-email.me...
>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> wrote in message
>>> news:nhkqr7$cuv$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> Barclay Weir wrote:
>>>>> On 19/05/16 11:11, Harold Davis wrote:
>>>>>> Have the newspapers been told not to say that the "married couple"
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> both
>>>>>> male?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Every report I've read refers to "PJS" (David Furnish) having "young
>>>>>> children" with his "spouse" "YMA" (Elton John), without saying that
>>>>>> his
>>>>>> "spouse" is another man.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You have named the "unnameable". Do you live abroad? See Ophelia's
>>>>> question in an earlier thread. If you live in England, are you
>>>>> awaiting
>>>>> a visit from the authorities? - or from PJS/YMA heavies? Ooops! there
>>>>> I've (nearly) gone and done it too!
>>>>
>>>> You didn't snip before replying, so yes, you did.
>>>
>>> Phew well at least I am in Scotland as (given his name) might Barclay.
>>>
>>> Umm you didn't snip it either ...
>>>
>>
>> Well, I don't care :-)
>
> Oooooooooohhhh :)
>
> If he ever gets a peerage, will t'other one be Lady thingy?
>

Excellent question.  I guess we'll be informed of the gender-neutral 
equivalent soon enough.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738994

"Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> wrote in message 
news:nhmp7v$f94$2@dont-email.me...
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> wrote in message
>> news:nhl9uo$938$1@dont-email.me...
>>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:nhkqr7$cuv$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>> Barclay Weir wrote:
>>>>>> On 19/05/16 11:11, Harold Davis wrote:
>>>>>>> Have the newspapers been told not to say that the "married couple"
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> both
>>>>>>> male?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Every report I've read refers to "PJS" (David Furnish) having "young
>>>>>>> children" with his "spouse" "YMA" (Elton John), without saying that
>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>> "spouse" is another man.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have named the "unnameable". Do you live abroad? See Ophelia's
>>>>>> question in an earlier thread. If you live in England, are you
>>>>>> awaiting
>>>>>> a visit from the authorities? - or from PJS/YMA heavies? Ooops! there
>>>>>> I've (nearly) gone and done it too!
>>>>>
>>>>> You didn't snip before replying, so yes, you did.
>>>>
>>>> Phew well at least I am in Scotland as (given his name) might Barclay.
>>>>
>>>> Umm you didn't snip it either ...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, I don't care :-)
>>
>> Oooooooooohhhh :)
>>
>> If he ever gets a peerage, will t'other one be Lady thingy?
>>
>
> Excellent question.  I guess we'll be informed of the gender-neutral 
> equivalent soon enough.

I don't doubt it :)

-- 
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738757

"Barclay Weir" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote in message 
news:dq64m8Fs9t9U1@mid.individual.net...
> On 19/05/16 11:11, Harold Davis wrote:
>> Have the newspapers been told not to say that the "married couple" are 
>> both
>> male?
>>
>> Every report I've read refers to "PJS" (David Furnish) having "young
>> children" with his "spouse" "YMA" (Elton John), without saying that his
>> "spouse" is another man.
>>
>
> You have named the "unnameable". Do you live abroad? See Ophelia's 
> question in an earlier thread. If you live in England, are you awaiting a 
> visit from the authorities? - or from PJS/YMA heavies? Ooops! there I've 
> (nearly) gone and done it too!

Ooops!  Me too?

-- 
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738777

Barclay Weir <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote in
news:dq64m8Fs9t9U1@mid.individual.net: 

> On 19/05/16 11:11, Harold Davis wrote:
>> Have the newspapers been told not to say that the "married couple"
>> are both male?
>>
>> Every report I've read refers to "PJS" (David Furnish) having "young
>> children" with his "spouse" "YMA" (Elton John), without saying that
>> his "spouse" is another man.
>>
> 
> You have named the "unnameable". Do you live abroad? See Ophelia's 
> question in an earlier thread. If you live in England, are you
> awaiting a visit from the authorities? - or from PJS/YMA heavies?
> Ooops! there I've (nearly) gone and done it too!

I live in Scotland, which is neither England nor abroad :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738780

In article <dq64m8Fs9t9U1@mid.individual.net>, nobody@nowhere.invalid 
says...
> 
> You have named the "unnameable". Do you live abroad? 

I fail to see the relevance?

Unless you are suggesting that every single UK citizen is supposed to be 
aware of every single piece of legislation that is passed.

In which case, it gets thrown out on the grounds of being unenforceable.

And, no, "ignorance of the law is no defence" doesn't work.

Unless we're actually living in North Korea.

Well......are we?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738787

On 19/05/16 19:57, Juan Carr wrote:
> In article <dq64m8Fs9t9U1@mid.individual.net>, nobody@nowhere.invalid
> says...
>>
>> You have named the "unnameable". Do you live abroad?
>
> I fail to see the relevance?
>
> Unless you are suggesting that every single UK citizen is supposed to be
> aware of every single piece of legislation that is passed.
>
> In which case, it gets thrown out on the grounds of being unenforceable.
>
> And, no, "ignorance of the law is no defence" doesn't work.
>
> Unless we're actually living in North Korea.
>
> Well......are we?
>

The relevance, Juan, is that these "injunctions" are only applicable and 
enforceable (see my earlier caveat in relation to Ophelia's question) in 
England (and Wales). You have actually put your finger on the whole 
point - I am a UK citizen living not in North Korea but in the UK - just 
not in England. Hence the question to the OP.
Indeed this raises the whole question about the Supreme Court (a Blair 
fantasy), how can it rule on the applicability of laws only enforceable 
in part of the UK? Just asking.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738915

On Thu, 19 May 2016 19:57:32 +0100, Juan Carr <juan.carr@gmx.com>
wrote:

>In article <dq64m8Fs9t9U1@mid.individual.net>, nobody@nowhere.invalid 
>says...
>> 
>> You have named the "unnameable". Do you live abroad? 
>
>I fail to see the relevance?
>
>Unless you are suggesting that every single UK citizen is supposed to be 
>aware of every single piece of legislation that is passed.
>
>In which case, it gets thrown out on the grounds of being unenforceable.
>
>And, no, "ignorance of the law is no defence" doesn't work.
>
>Unless we're actually living in North Korea.
>
>Well......are we?

'law' in an oppressive country is crafted so's there is just about
    always something you can be attacked with...

that is particularly true if you have no constitutional constrictions
    on government...which is the case in the uk...and most everywhere
    else...

i'm glad to see the cameron government is committed to introducing
     a uk bill of rights


-- 
www.abelard.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738929

abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:

> i'm glad to see the cameron government is committed to introducing
>      a uk bill of rights

The 'Cameron government' is 'committed' to no such thing.  One, because
basic civil and political rights are anathema to right-wing governments,
and always have been - from Hitler all the way down to Cameron. 

But more important, any such 'bill of rights' would not be worth the paper
it was written on.  

Y.
-- 
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
	'I approve of anybody who commits such acts of violence. Really, I
	don't think that we can sit back and watch Arabs throwing rocks at
	buses whenever they feel like it. They must understand that a bomb
	thrown at a Jewish bus is going to mean a bomb thrown at an Arab
	bus...'
	(Meir Kahane (1932 - 1990))
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>	
<http://thereligionofpeace.com/>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738932

On Fri, 20 May 2016 10:06:46 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
<yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:

>abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>
>> i'm glad to see the cameron government is committed to introducing
>>      a uk bill of rights
>
>The 'Cameron government' is 'committed' to no such thing.

he is carrying out other promises...remember, he isn't a socialist
    who therefore lies for practice...

but your mind reading skills will doubtless be lauded by your fellow
    cultists...

or perhaps you don't understand what 'commitment means

>  One, because
>basic civil and political rights are anathema to right-wing governments,
>and always have been - from Hitler all the way down to Cameron. 

you are getting confused, adolf was of course a 'man' of the left

>But more important, any such 'bill of rights' would not be worth the paper
>it was written on.  

and now you also want to read tea-leaves....

surely you could do better? surely??

so...for this one post...
you believe you can discern the future...
you believe you can read minds...
you don't understand basic politics...
and you don't know the meaning of english words...

and you wonder how you got to be class clown!!


-- 
www.abelard.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#739304

abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2016 10:06:46 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:

>>> i'm glad to see the cameron government is committed to introducing
>>>      a uk bill of rights
>>
>>The 'Cameron government' is 'committed' to no such thing.
 
> he is carrying out other promises...

The only 'promise' that he is carrying out is the one he made to his banker
and arms dealer friends to make them richer at the expense of the majority
of the UK.  

> remember, he isn't a socialist
>     who therefore lies for practice...

To those on other groups: the above is the usual infantile fare that we on
uk.politics.misc have to suffer from this insane rightard troll.  We're
used to it, but I shall snip crossposts, to save you having to read the
words of an imbecile who blames 'socialism' for everything from the
extintion of the dinosaurs, through the last age and everything up to the
present day via the eruption of Mount St Helen's. 

{ binned unread to save you any more embarrassment }

Y.

-- 
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
	'I approve of anybody who commits such acts of violence. Really, I
	don't think that we can sit back and watch Arabs throwing rocks at
	buses whenever they feel like it. They must understand that a bomb
	thrown at a Jewish bus is going to mean a bomb thrown at an Arab
	bus...'
	(Meir Kahane (1932 - 1990))
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>	
<http://thereligionofpeace.com/>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#739308

On Sun, 22 May 2016 17:09:28 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
<yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:

>abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 May 2016 10:06:46 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>>abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>
>>>> i'm glad to see the cameron government is committed to introducing
>>>>      a uk bill of rights
>>>
>>>The 'Cameron government' is 'committed' to no such thing.
> 
>> he is carrying out other promises...
>
>The only 'promise' that he is carrying out is the one he made to his banker
>and arms dealer friends to make them richer at the expense of the majority
>of the UK.  
>
>> remember, he isn't a socialist
>>     who therefore lies for practice...
>
>To those on other groups: the above is the usual infantile fare that we on
>uk.politics.misc have to suffer from this insane rightard troll.  We're
>used to it, but I shall snip crossposts, to save you having to read the
>words of an imbecile who blames 'socialism' for everything from the
>extintion of the dinosaurs, through the last age and everything up to the
>present day via the eruption of Mount St Helen's. 
>
>{ binned unread to save you any more embarrassment }

i see you are wriggling as usual...



-- 
www.abelard.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#739333

Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein wrote :
> abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 May 2016 10:06:46 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
>> <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>> abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>
>>>> i'm glad to see the cameron government is committed to introducing
>>>>       a uk bill of rights
>>>  
>>> The 'Cameron government' is 'committed' to no such thing.
>
>> he is carrying out other promises...
>
> The only 'promise' that he is carrying out is the one he made to his banker
> and arms dealer friends to make them richer at the expense of the majority
> of the UK.
>
>> remember, he isn't a socialist
>>      who therefore lies for practice...
>
> To those on other groups: the above is the usual infantile fare that we on
> uk.politics.misc have to suffer from this insane rightard troll.  We're
> used to it, but I shall snip crossposts, to save you having to read the
> words of an imbecile who blames 'socialism' for everything from the
> extintion of the dinosaurs, through the last age and everything up to the
> present day via the eruption of Mount St Helen's.
>
> { binned unread to save you any more embarrassment }

Rush Limbaugh had Elton as the entertainment for his wedding and proudly posed 
for photos with him.

Why couldn't Rush get a meat eating right wing heterosexual icon like Ted 
Nugent?

I guess that lately, Nugent's been too contoversial.    Admiting to having sex 
with underaged girls around the time he was a draft dodger, and being a raving 
anti-semite and racist who even the NRA (where he serves on the Board of 
Directors) renouced his lunacy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738969

Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in
news:6m031d-456.ln1@server.com.il: 

> abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
> 
>> i'm glad to see the cameron government is committed to introducing
>>      a uk bill of rights
> 
> The 'Cameron government' is 'committed' to no such thing.

Yes it is - in its recent statement of its legislative programme, read out 
by the monarch.

Whether it would be worth the paper it's written on is another matter.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#738971

On 20 May 2016 12:44 PM ,Harold Davis <this@is.not.a.real.email.address.invalid> wrote:
> Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in
> news:6m031d-456.ln1@server.com.il: 
> 
> > abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> i'm glad to see the cameron government is committed to introducing
> >>      a uk bill of rights
> > 
> > The 'Cameron government' is 'committed' to no such thing.
> 
> Yes it is - in its recent statement of its legislative programme, read out 
> by the monarch.
> 
> Whether it would be worth the paper it's written on is another matter.


Although the wording was a little vague, something like 'my government will bring forward proposals for a British Bill Of Rights'. 

Not the most committed statement ever made. 

-- 
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#739266

Harold Davis <this@is.not.a.real.email.address.invalid> wrote:
> Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in
> news:6m031d-456.ln1@server.com.il: 
>> abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:

>>> i'm glad to see the cameron government is committed to introducing a uk
>>> bill of rights

>> The 'Cameron government' is 'committed' to no such thing.
 
> Yes it is - in its recent statement of its legislative programme, read
> out by the monarch.
> 
> Whether it would be worth the paper it's written on is another matter.

Which was my point.  Cameron is a proven liar.  Why should this 'promise'
be any different from the others he has made and broken? 

Y.
-- 
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
	'I approve of anybody who commits such acts of violence. Really, I
	don't think that we can sit back and watch Arabs throwing rocks at
	buses whenever they feel like it. They must understand that a bomb
	thrown at a Jewish bus is going to mean a bomb thrown at an Arab
	bus...'
	(Meir Kahane (1932 - 1990))
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>	
<http://thereligionofpeace.com/>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#739274

On Sun, 22 May 2016 13:35:12 +0100, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
<yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote:

>Harold Davis <this@is.not.a.real.email.address.invalid> wrote:
>> Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitzhak@yahoo.fr> wrote in
>> news:6m031d-456.ln1@server.com.il: 
>>> abelard <abelard3@abelard.org> wrote:
>
>>>> i'm glad to see the cameron government is committed to introducing a uk
>>>> bill of rights
>
>>> The 'Cameron government' is 'committed' to no such thing.
> 
>> Yes it is - in its recent statement of its legislative programme, read
>> out by the monarch.
>> 
>> Whether it would be worth the paper it's written on is another matter.
>
>Which was my point.  Cameron is a proven liar.  Why should this 'promise'
>be any different from the others he has made and broken? 

i look forward to your list...

or i'll just have to guess that is just another lie towards
    your monthly quota



-- 
www.abelard.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | uk.politics.misc

csiph-web