Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #181561 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-08-05 12:38 +0100 |
| Last post | 2025-08-14 15:27 +0100 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 91 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to uk.comp.sys.mac
Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-05 12:38 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-06 00:06 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-06 05:58 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 11:19 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-08 12:55 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 15:39 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-08 17:21 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 19:13 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-08 12:29 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 21:40 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-08 13:51 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 21:58 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-08 21:30 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 23:01 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-09 14:05 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 18:54 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-09 21:09 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 22:47 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 20:06 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-08 15:18 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 09:50 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-09 09:15 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 18:58 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-09 13:15 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 22:49 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-09 15:38 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-10 09:46 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-10 12:41 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 20:09 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-13 12:32 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 21:58 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 22:12 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-13 14:54 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-11 19:08 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2025-08-10 09:07 -0400
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-10 12:41 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-08 22:07 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-08 15:37 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-08 22:57 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-08 13:56 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-09 04:48 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 09:44 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-11 19:08 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 10:01 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Creon <creon@creon.earth> - 2025-08-09 09:48 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 12:13 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com> - 2025-08-09 22:05 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 23:20 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-09 15:32 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 20:07 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-13 21:16 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 22:45 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-13 14:55 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> - 2025-08-13 20:09 -0500
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-14 08:58 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> - 2025-08-14 17:23 -0500
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-14 14:58 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-24 08:31 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> - 2025-08-24 17:55 -0500
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-25 08:28 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-25 07:02 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-25 17:46 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> - 2025-08-25 10:19 -0500
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-08-25 17:44 +0200
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-25 17:43 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-25 22:24 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-25 22:59 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-26 10:50 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 13:29 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-08-26 15:19 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 15:30 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 08:46 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 15:47 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-08-26 18:02 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-08-26 21:07 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-26 07:31 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 13:24 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-08-26 15:16 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-08-26 16:22 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Creon <creon@creon.earth> - 2025-08-26 21:21 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-08-26 22:24 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-31 21:03 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-31 22:14 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 14:34 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-31 21:03 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-31 22:15 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-14 15:27 +0100
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-26 13:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68adb58a$1$3782$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #181746 |
On Aug 25, 2025 at 11:31:04 PM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mh52l8FmrjgU1@mid.individual.net>: > On 25/08/2025 23:24, Gremlin wrote: >> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mh3i4uFd4ftU2@mid.individual.net Mon, >> 25 Aug 2025 16:43:10 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >> >>> Does anyone reading here actually *USE* the EtreCheck software and enjoy >>> interaction with the developer? >> >> I'm not a mac person by trade, David. So, other than reverse engineering to >> put your ill conceived theories about it containing or being malware, I have >> not used the product, nor would I specifically need to do so. That program >> is designed for people to assist end users (like yourself) via self support >> forums. It's one of many tools of that kind. I've already explained this to >> you, previously, several times, as well. It's in one ear and right out the >> other one; since you clearly don't remember what you've already been told. I >> have interacted with it's author on several occasions though. I've found the >> individual to be friendly, responsive, and quite knowledgeable. It's a shame >> that as another utility author that we have you in common. You've gone after >> my program at one point in the past as well. FFS, You initiated email >> contact with me, already lying your arse off about the reason(s) you >> contacted me in the first place. It damn sure was not for technical support >> for BugHunter. That was a ruse you crafted to interact with me. >> >> I *should have* ignored your emails that had nothing to do with supporting >> BugHunter. Had I known as much as I do now about you, I would have ended our >> comms the moment you first began to stray from requesting BugHunter >> assistance. You're a stalking, nutjob, pile of shit. > > Do you deny that YOU once posted this? > > //Hmm, I've considered it. But, i have to be honest with you. i don't > give a damn about most people; people to me are like insects, they > deserve to be treated as cruely as I can possibly treat them. > Notice, i said most people not all. Perhaps it's the way I myself > have been treated in my short miserable life (ah **** it, go ahead > cracky, nail me, wide open freebie). But, I was raised with the > "nail me, nail you" concept. I've been nailed since I began > breathing.. if I had my way, I'd long be dead... but, that's a > different topic, so I won't bore you with my > life story.// > > You, Dustin Cook, are the 'bad guy', not me! You don't happen to have the MID where he said that? He has admitted to it, so not THAT important. Sadly he has not grown at all since he posted that. >>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >> >> I've already reverse engineered two builds of this program and found >> absolutely no malicious code of any kind present inside the binary or the >> scripts. I reported this to you each time. You then proceeded to twist your >> original accusation to 'How do we know it doesn't download malware later via >> the internet?' - When I asked why you don't subject nearly every other >> program, including OS(s), to the same question you avoided answering. Yet >> here you are, yet again, inferring the program might contain or otherwise >> will contain malware. It's a shame the author hasn't opted to pursue you via >> legal channels at this point. > > Gremlin, > > You have stated that you have reverse-engineered EtreCheck. The > software’s Terms of Use expressly forbid reverse engineering, > decompiling, or disassembly. By your own admission, you have acted > contrary to those terms. > > In light of that, any claims or assurances you make about the internal > workings of EtreCheck are undermined by the fact that they stem from a > breach of its license agreement. > > = > > GRANT OF LICENSE > > https://www.etrecheck.com/en/EULA.html > > Etresoft hereby grants you a limited, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, > non-transferable right to install and run copies of the specified > version of the software that is released under this License (the > “Software”). > > You may not: > > loan, sell, or otherwise distribute all or any part of the Software; > decompile, disassemble or undertake any form of re-engineering process > on the Software or provide your assistance to any effort of a third > party to do so; > > modify or alter in any manner the Software or take part in any such an > effort initiated by a third party; and > > loan, sell, share or otherwise distribute activation codes or license > codes with any third party. > > This License does not grant you the right to access to the source code > of the Software. If, in certain circumstances, such access is desired by > you, you may enter into a separate license with Etresoft. He accused the two of us of going against terms of service. With no evidence. Sigh. -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-26 15:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mh5ttaFr7keU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181750 |
On 26/08/2025 14:24, Brock McNuggets wrote: > On Aug 25, 2025 at 11:31:04 PM MST, ""David B."" wrote > <mh52l8FmrjgU1@mid.individual.net>: > >> On 25/08/2025 23:24, Gremlin wrote: >>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mh3i4uFd4ftU2@mid.individual.net Mon, >>> 25 Aug 2025 16:43:10 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>> >>>> Does anyone reading here actually *USE* the EtreCheck software and enjoy >>>> interaction with the developer? >>> >>> I'm not a mac person by trade, David. So, other than reverse engineering to >>> put your ill conceived theories about it containing or being malware, I have >>> not used the product, nor would I specifically need to do so. That program >>> is designed for people to assist end users (like yourself) via self support >>> forums. It's one of many tools of that kind. I've already explained this to >>> you, previously, several times, as well. It's in one ear and right out the >>> other one; since you clearly don't remember what you've already been told. I >>> have interacted with it's author on several occasions though. I've found the >>> individual to be friendly, responsive, and quite knowledgeable. It's a shame >>> that as another utility author that we have you in common. You've gone after >>> my program at one point in the past as well. FFS, You initiated email >>> contact with me, already lying your arse off about the reason(s) you >>> contacted me in the first place. It damn sure was not for technical support >>> for BugHunter. That was a ruse you crafted to interact with me. >>> >>> I *should have* ignored your emails that had nothing to do with supporting >>> BugHunter. Had I known as much as I do now about you, I would have ended our >>> comms the moment you first began to stray from requesting BugHunter >>> assistance. You're a stalking, nutjob, pile of shit. >> >> Do you deny that YOU once posted this? >> >> //Hmm, I've considered it. But, i have to be honest with you. i don't >> give a damn about most people; people to me are like insects, they >> deserve to be treated as cruely as I can possibly treat them. >> Notice, i said most people not all. Perhaps it's the way I myself >> have been treated in my short miserable life (ah **** it, go ahead >> cracky, nail me, wide open freebie). But, I was raised with the >> "nail me, nail you" concept. I've been nailed since I began >> breathing.. if I had my way, I'd long be dead... but, that's a >> different topic, so I won't bore you with my >> life story.// >> >> You, Dustin Cook, are the 'bad guy', not me! > > You don't happen to have the MID where he said that? He has admitted to it, so > not THAT important. Sadly he has not grown at all since he posted that. Sadly I do not - but I /do/ have this:- https://i.ibb.co/mqxpByb/dustin-September-2012-copy-edited.jpg >>>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >>> >>> I've already reverse engineered two builds of this program and found >>> absolutely no malicious code of any kind present inside the binary or the >>> scripts. I reported this to you each time. You then proceeded to twist your >>> original accusation to 'How do we know it doesn't download malware later via >>> the internet?' - When I asked why you don't subject nearly every other >>> program, including OS(s), to the same question you avoided answering. Yet >>> here you are, yet again, inferring the program might contain or otherwise >>> will contain malware. It's a shame the author hasn't opted to pursue you via >>> legal channels at this point. >> >> Gremlin, >> >> You have stated that you have reverse-engineered EtreCheck. The >> software’s Terms of Use expressly forbid reverse engineering, >> decompiling, or disassembly. By your own admission, you have acted >> contrary to those terms. >> >> In light of that, any claims or assurances you make about the internal >> workings of EtreCheck are undermined by the fact that they stem from a >> breach of its license agreement. >> >> = >> >> GRANT OF LICENSE >> >> https://www.etrecheck.com/en/EULA.html >> >> Etresoft hereby grants you a limited, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, >> non-transferable right to install and run copies of the specified >> version of the software that is released under this License (the >> “Software”). >> >> You may not: >> >> loan, sell, or otherwise distribute all or any part of the Software; >> decompile, disassemble or undertake any form of re-engineering process >> on the Software or provide your assistance to any effort of a third >> party to do so; >> >> modify or alter in any manner the Software or take part in any such an >> effort initiated by a third party; and >> >> loan, sell, share or otherwise distribute activation codes or license >> codes with any third party. >> >> This License does not grant you the right to access to the source code >> of the Software. If, in certain circumstances, such access is desired by >> you, you may enter into a separate license with Etresoft. > > He accused the two of us of going against terms of service. With no evidence. > Sigh. Sadly, he's not an honest poster. :-(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-26 16:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mh61q4FrskoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181750 |
On 26/08/2025 14:24, Brock McNuggets wrote: > You don't happen to have the MID where he said that? He has admitted to it, so > not THAT important. Sadly he has not grown at all since he posted that. It was in the scorched-earth group. Here's a screenshot:- https://postimg.cc/GHysz5Zz That may help. I'll look some more! -- David
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Creon <creon@creon.earth> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-26 21:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mh6mq9FsipdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181746 |
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 07:31:04 +0100, David B. wrote: > On 25/08/2025 23:24, Gremlin wrote: >> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mh3i4uFd4ftU2@mid.individual.net Mon, >> 25 Aug 2025 16:43:10 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >> >>> Does anyone reading here actually *USE* the EtreCheck software and enjoy >>> interaction with the developer? >> >> I'm not a mac person by trade, David. So, other than reverse engineering to >> put your ill conceived theories about it containing or being malware, I have >> not used the product, nor would I specifically need to do so. That program >> is designed for people to assist end users (like yourself) via self support >> forums. It's one of many tools of that kind. I've already explained this to >> you, previously, several times, as well. It's in one ear and right out the >> other one; since you clearly don't remember what you've already been told. I >> have interacted with it's author on several occasions though. I've found the >> individual to be friendly, responsive, and quite knowledgeable. It's a shame >> that as another utility author that we have you in common. You've gone after >> my program at one point in the past as well. FFS, You initiated email >> contact with me, already lying your arse off about the reason(s) you >> contacted me in the first place. It damn sure was not for technical support >> for BugHunter. That was a ruse you crafted to interact with me. >> >> I *should have* ignored your emails that had nothing to do with supporting >> BugHunter. Had I known as much as I do now about you, I would have ended our >> comms the moment you first began to stray from requesting BugHunter >> assistance. You're a stalking, nutjob, pile of shit. > > Do you deny that YOU once posted this? > > //Hmm, I've considered it. But, i have to be honest with you. i don't > give a damn about most people; people to me are like insects, they > deserve to be treated as cruely as I can possibly treat them. > Notice, i said most people not all. Perhaps it's the way I myself > have been treated in my short miserable life (ah **** it, go ahead > cracky, nail me, wide open freebie). But, I was raised with the > "nail me, nail you" concept. I've been nailed since I began > breathing.. if I had my way, I'd long be dead... but, that's a > different topic, so I won't bore you with my > life story.// > > You, Dustin Cook, are the 'bad guy', not me! >>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >> >> I've already reverse engineered two builds of this program and found >> absolutely no malicious code of any kind present inside the binary or the >> scripts. I reported this to you each time. You then proceeded to twist your >> original accusation to 'How do we know it doesn't download malware later via >> the internet?' - When I asked why you don't subject nearly every other >> program, including OS(s), to the same question you avoided answering. Yet >> here you are, yet again, inferring the program might contain or otherwise >> will contain malware. It's a shame the author hasn't opted to pursue you via >> legal channels at this point. > > Gremlin, > > You have stated that you have reverse-engineered EtreCheck. The > software’s Terms of Use expressly forbid reverse engineering, > decompiling, or disassembly. By your own admission, you have acted > contrary to those terms. > > In light of that, any claims or assurances you make about the internal > workings of EtreCheck are undermined by the fact that they stem from a > breach of its license agreement. > So he helps you out -- at your request -- and then you stab him in the back. Buhbye. -- -c System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G OS: Linux 6.16.3 D: Mint 22.1 DE: Xfce 4.18 NVIDIA: 580.76.05 Mem: 258G "This Charlie Brown must have been a very wise man."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-26 22:24 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mh6n0pFpnhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181761 |
On 26/08/2025 22:21, Creon wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 07:31:04 +0100, David B. wrote: > >> On 25/08/2025 23:24, Gremlin wrote: >>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mh3i4uFd4ftU2@mid.individual.net Mon, >>> 25 Aug 2025 16:43:10 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>> >>>> Does anyone reading here actually *USE* the EtreCheck software and enjoy >>>> interaction with the developer? >>> >>> I'm not a mac person by trade, David. So, other than reverse engineering to >>> put your ill conceived theories about it containing or being malware, I have >>> not used the product, nor would I specifically need to do so. That program >>> is designed for people to assist end users (like yourself) via self support >>> forums. It's one of many tools of that kind. I've already explained this to >>> you, previously, several times, as well. It's in one ear and right out the >>> other one; since you clearly don't remember what you've already been told. I >>> have interacted with it's author on several occasions though. I've found the >>> individual to be friendly, responsive, and quite knowledgeable. It's a shame >>> that as another utility author that we have you in common. You've gone after >>> my program at one point in the past as well. FFS, You initiated email >>> contact with me, already lying your arse off about the reason(s) you >>> contacted me in the first place. It damn sure was not for technical support >>> for BugHunter. That was a ruse you crafted to interact with me. >>> >>> I *should have* ignored your emails that had nothing to do with supporting >>> BugHunter. Had I known as much as I do now about you, I would have ended our >>> comms the moment you first began to stray from requesting BugHunter >>> assistance. You're a stalking, nutjob, pile of shit. >> >> Do you deny that YOU once posted this? >> >> //Hmm, I've considered it. But, i have to be honest with you. i don't >> give a damn about most people; people to me are like insects, they >> deserve to be treated as cruely as I can possibly treat them. >> Notice, i said most people not all. Perhaps it's the way I myself >> have been treated in my short miserable life (ah **** it, go ahead >> cracky, nail me, wide open freebie). But, I was raised with the >> "nail me, nail you" concept. I've been nailed since I began >> breathing.. if I had my way, I'd long be dead... but, that's a >> different topic, so I won't bore you with my >> life story.// >> >> You, Dustin Cook, are the 'bad guy', not me! >>>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >>> >>> I've already reverse engineered two builds of this program and found >>> absolutely no malicious code of any kind present inside the binary or the >>> scripts. I reported this to you each time. You then proceeded to twist your >>> original accusation to 'How do we know it doesn't download malware later via >>> the internet?' - When I asked why you don't subject nearly every other >>> program, including OS(s), to the same question you avoided answering. Yet >>> here you are, yet again, inferring the program might contain or otherwise >>> will contain malware. It's a shame the author hasn't opted to pursue you via >>> legal channels at this point. >> >> Gremlin, >> >> You have stated that you have reverse-engineered EtreCheck. The >> software’s Terms of Use expressly forbid reverse engineering, >> decompiling, or disassembly. By your own admission, you have acted >> contrary to those terms. >> >> In light of that, any claims or assurances you make about the internal >> workings of EtreCheck are undermined by the fact that they stem from a >> breach of its license agreement. >> > > So he helps you out -- at your request -- and then you stab > him in the back. Surely you don't believe he was telling the truth? <rolls eyes> I had higher hopes for you, a fellow Linux Mint man. :-(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-31 21:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsB34CAD72A369FHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> |
| In reply to | #181762 |
"David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> news:mh6n0pFpnhU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 26 Aug 2025 21:24:41 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On 26/08/2025 22:21, Creon wrote: >> So he helps you out -- at your request -- and then you stab >> him in the back. > > Surely you don't believe he was telling the truth? <rolls eyes> I've read the posts between you and Snit, David. I won't even bother responding to any of your bullshit or his. If you doubt what I wrote I did, that's perfectly fine with me. The point remains, You have next to nobody with actual tech skills now willing to help you. :) And you have to thank your repeated dishonesty, trolling, and stalking habits for that. You and dumbass snit can continue talking shit about me if that's what pleases you. I will sit back and laugh as my well known and established track record speaks for itself. And no amount of quoting me out of context and pretending to be unable to understand what you read like snit is going to change that. In the end, you can go fuck yourself. And I'm still going to skull fuck snit in both eyes. And as with Jenn, I'll mock you both as I give you a play by play of how he becomes my 3rd bitch. Just like Jenn and Eagle. As with them, you will do absolutely fucking nothing but watch. :-) And you will do fuckall about it; except to watch as you're powerless to stop me. Have a nice day, fucktard. -- I don't need no Dr. All I need...is my lawyer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-31 22:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68b4c953$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #181789 |
On Aug 31, 2025 at 2:03:02 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB34CAD72A369FHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>: > "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> > news:mh6n0pFpnhU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 26 Aug 2025 21:24:41 GMT in > alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > >> On 26/08/2025 22:21, Creon wrote: >>> So he helps you out -- at your request -- and then you stab >>> him in the back. >> >> Surely you don't believe he was telling the truth? <rolls eyes> > > I've read the posts between you and Snit, David. I won't even bother > responding to any of your bullshit or his. You have no counter. Fair enough. > If you doubt what I wrote I did, > that's perfectly fine with me. > > The point remains, You have next to nobody with actual tech skills now willing > to help you. :) Nor you! > And you have to thank your repeated dishonesty, trolling, and stalking habits > for that. Projection on your part. Heck, just today you encouraged someone to dox me. > You and dumbass snit can continue talking shit about me if that's > what pleases you. You are the one "talking shit" right now. I quote you... and you hate it. You hate YOUR words. So be it. > I will sit back and laugh as my well known and established > track record speaks for itself. And no amount of quoting me out of context and > pretending to be unable to understand what you read like snit is going to > change that. Your victim mentality comes to the fore. > > In the end, you can go fuck yourself. And I'm still going to skull fuck snit > in both eyes. How many years have you been saying this? > And as with Jenn, I'll mock you both as I give you a play by > play of how he becomes my 3rd bitch. Just like Jenn and Eagle. As with them, > you will do absolutely fucking nothing but watch. :-) You brag about harming people. This speaks VERY poorly of you. Meanwhile, with all your lies and attacks and other BS, I have never lifted a finger to harm you. > > And you will do fuckall about it; except to watch as you're powerless to stop > me. > > Have a nice day, fucktard. More of your threats. More of your insecurities. I do like how once I started calling you out you tucked tail and ran away... at least to the point of not even trying to counter what I say and pretending to not respond to my comments. You are a coward. -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-26 14:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <Fc-dndyLLOn-tTP1nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #181761 |
Creon wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 07:31:04 +0100, David B. wrote: > >> On 25/08/2025 23:24, Gremlin wrote: >>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mh3i4uFd4ftU2@mid.individual.net Mon, >>> 25 Aug 2025 16:43:10 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>> >>>> Does anyone reading here actually *USE* the EtreCheck software and enjoy >>>> interaction with the developer? >>> >>> I'm not a mac person by trade, David. So, other than reverse engineering to >>> put your ill conceived theories about it containing or being malware, I have >>> not used the product, nor would I specifically need to do so. That program >>> is designed for people to assist end users (like yourself) via self support >>> forums. It's one of many tools of that kind. I've already explained this to >>> you, previously, several times, as well. It's in one ear and right out the >>> other one; since you clearly don't remember what you've already been told. I >>> have interacted with it's author on several occasions though. I've found the >>> individual to be friendly, responsive, and quite knowledgeable. It's a shame >>> that as another utility author that we have you in common. You've gone after >>> my program at one point in the past as well. FFS, You initiated email >>> contact with me, already lying your arse off about the reason(s) you >>> contacted me in the first place. It damn sure was not for technical support >>> for BugHunter. That was a ruse you crafted to interact with me. >>> >>> I *should have* ignored your emails that had nothing to do with supporting >>> BugHunter. Had I known as much as I do now about you, I would have ended our >>> comms the moment you first began to stray from requesting BugHunter >>> assistance. You're a stalking, nutjob, pile of shit. >> >> Do you deny that YOU once posted this? >> >> //Hmm, I've considered it. But, i have to be honest with you. i don't >> give a damn about most people; people to me are like insects, they >> deserve to be treated as cruely as I can possibly treat them. >> Notice, i said most people not all. Perhaps it's the way I myself >> have been treated in my short miserable life (ah **** it, go ahead >> cracky, nail me, wide open freebie). But, I was raised with the >> "nail me, nail you" concept. I've been nailed since I began >> breathing.. if I had my way, I'd long be dead... but, that's a >> different topic, so I won't bore you with my >> life story.// >> >> You, Dustin Cook, are the 'bad guy', not me! >>>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >>> >>> I've already reverse engineered two builds of this program and found >>> absolutely no malicious code of any kind present inside the binary or the >>> scripts. I reported this to you each time. You then proceeded to twist your >>> original accusation to 'How do we know it doesn't download malware later via >>> the internet?' - When I asked why you don't subject nearly every other >>> program, including OS(s), to the same question you avoided answering. Yet >>> here you are, yet again, inferring the program might contain or otherwise >>> will contain malware. It's a shame the author hasn't opted to pursue you via >>> legal channels at this point. >> >> Gremlin, >> >> You have stated that you have reverse-engineered EtreCheck. The >> software’s Terms of Use expressly forbid reverse engineering, >> decompiling, or disassembly. By your own admission, you have acted >> contrary to those terms. >> >> In light of that, any claims or assurances you make about the internal >> workings of EtreCheck are undermined by the fact that they stem from a >> breach of its license agreement. >> > > So he helps you out -- at your request -- and then you stab > him in the back. > > Buhbye. > usenet usenet usenet
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-31 21:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsB34CAD7498169HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> |
| In reply to | #181761 |
Creon <creon@creon.earth> news:mh6mq9FsipdU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 26
Aug 2025 21:21:14 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
[snip Davids bullshit]
> So he helps you out -- at your request -- and then you stab
> him in the back.
I've helped his tech fucktard level ass out several times. No more. He can
fucking learn to swim or drown at this point. Few people posting here have
the tech chops that I do, and of those, I don't see anyone wanting to waste
their time to help him out.
On a completely unrelated note, I recently acquired some new to me gear.
Check this out:
Snapshot created on: 20250615_1900
System:
Kernel: 6.1.0-38-amd64 [6.1.147-1] arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v:
12.2.0
parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.1.0-38-amd64 root=UUID=<filter>
ro quiet splash
Desktop: Xfce v: 4.20.0 tk: Gtk v: 3.24.38 info: xfce4-panel wm: xfwm v:
4.20.0 vt: 7
dm: LightDM v: 1.32.0 Distro: MX-23.6_x64 Libretto April 13 2025 base:
Debian GNU/Linux 12
(bookworm)
Machine:
Type: Laptop System: Acer product: Nitro AN515-57 v: V1.17 serial:
<superuser required>
Mobo: TGL model: Scala_TLS v: V1.17 serial: <superuser required> UEFI:
Insyde v: 1.17
date: 06/02/2022
Battery:
ID-1: BAT1 charge: 41.4 Wh (84.8%) condition: 48.8/57.5 Wh (84.9%) volts:
15.8 min: 15.4
model: LGC AP18E8M type: Li-ion serial: <filter> status: discharging
cycles: 12
CPU:
Info: model: 11th Gen Intel Core i7-11800H bits: 64 type: MT MCP arch:
Tiger Lake gen: core 11
level: v4 note: check built: 2020 process: Intel 10nm family: 6 model-id:
0x8D (141) stepping: 1
microcode: 0x56
Topology: cpus: 1x cores: 8 tpc: 2 threads: 16 smt: enabled cache: L1: 640
KiB
desc: d-8x48 KiB; i-8x32 KiB L2: 10 MiB desc: 8x1.2 MiB L3: 24 MiB desc:
1x24 MiB
Speed (MHz): avg: 829 high: 1050 min/max: 800/4600 scaling: driver:
intel_pstate
governor: powersave cores: 1: 800 2: 800 3: 800 4: 800 5: 800 6: 1050 7:
800 8: 800 9: 1027
10: 800 11: 800 12: 800 13: 800 14: 800 15: 800 16: 800 bogomips: 73728
Flags: avx avx2 ht lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx
Vulnerabilities:
Type: gather_data_sampling mitigation: Microcode
Type: indirect_target_selection mitigation: Aligned branch/return thunks
Type: itlb_multihit status: Not affected
Type: l1tf status: Not affected
Type: mds status: Not affected
Type: meltdown status: Not affected
Type: mmio_stale_data status: Not affected
Type: reg_file_data_sampling status: Not affected
Type: retbleed status: Not affected
Type: spec_rstack_overflow status: Not affected
Type: spec_store_bypass mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via
prctl
Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer
sanitization
Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional;
PBRSB-eIBRS: SW
sequence; BHI: SW loop, KVM: SW loop
Type: srbds status: Not affected
Type: tsa status: Not affected
Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected
Graphics:
Device-1: Intel TigerLake-H GT1 [UHD Graphics] vendor: Acer Incorporated
ALI driver: i915
v: kernel arch: Gen-12.1 process: Intel 10nm built: 2020-21 ports:
active: eDP-1 empty: DP-1,DP-2
bus-ID: 0000:00:02.0 chip-ID: 8086:9a60 class-ID: 0300
Device-2: NVIDIA GA107M [GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile] vendor: Acer
Incorporated ALI driver: N/A
alternate: nouveau non-free: 530.xx+ status: current (as of 2023-03)
arch: Ampere code: GAxxx
process: TSMC n7 (7nm) built: 2020-22 bus-ID: 0000:01:00.0 chip-ID:
10de:25a0 class-ID: 0300
Device-3: Quanta HD User Facing type: USB driver: uvcvideo bus-ID: 3-9:3
chip-ID: 0408:a061
class-ID: 0e02
Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 1.21.1.7 compositor: xfwm v: 4.20.0 driver:
X:
loaded: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa dri: iris gpu: i915 display-ID:
:0.0 screens: 1
Screen-1: 0 s-res: 1920x1080 s-dpi: 96 s-size: 509x286mm (20.04x11.26")
s-diag: 584mm (22.99")
Monitor-1: eDP-1 model: Najing CEC Panda 0x004d built: 2019 res: 1920x1080
hz: 144 dpi: 142
gamma: 1.2 size: 344x194mm (13.54x7.64") diag: 395mm (15.5") ratio: 16:9
modes: 1920x1080
API: OpenGL v: 4.6 Mesa 22.3.6 renderer: Mesa Intel UHD Graphics (TGL GT1)
direct-render: Yes
Audio:
Device-1: Intel Tiger Lake-H HD Audio vendor: Acer Incorporated ALI driver:
snd_hda_intel
v: kernel alternate: snd_sof_pci_intel_tgl bus-ID: 0000:00:1f.3 chip-ID:
8086:43c8 class-ID: 0403
Device-2: NVIDIA vendor: Acer Incorporated ALI driver: snd_hda_intel v:
kernel
bus-ID: 0000:01:00.1 chip-ID: 10de:2291 class-ID: 0403
API: ALSA v: k6.1.0-38-amd64 status: kernel-api tools: alsamixer,amixer
Server-1: PipeWire v: 1.0.0 status: active with: 1: pipewire-pulse status:
active
2: wireplumber status: active 3: pipewire-alsa type: plugin 4: pw-jack
type: plugin
tools: pactl,pw-cat,pw-cli,wpctl
Network:
Device-1: Intel Tiger Lake PCH CNVi WiFi vendor: Rivet Networks driver:
iwlwifi v: kernel
modules: wl bus-ID: 0000:00:14.3 chip-ID: 8086:43f0 class-ID: 0280
IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
Device-2: Realtek vendor: Acer Incorporated ALI driver: r8169 v: kernel
port: 3000
bus-ID: 0000:02:00.0 chip-ID: 10ec:2600 class-ID: 0200
IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
Bluetooth:
Device-1: Intel AX201 Bluetooth type: USB driver: btusb v: 0.8 bus-ID:
3-14:4 chip-ID: 8087:0026
class-ID: e001
Report: hciconfig ID: hci0 rfk-id: 3 state: up address: <filter> bt-v: 3.0
lmp-v: 5.2
sub-v: 200f hci-v: 5.2 rev: 200f
Info: acl-mtu: 1021:4 sco-mtu: 96:6 link-policy: rswitch sniff link-mode:
peripheral accept
service-classes: rendering, capturing, object transfer, audio, telephony
RAID:
Hardware-1: Intel Volume Management Device NVMe RAID Controller driver:
vmd v: 0.6 port: N/A
bus-ID: 0000:00:0e.0 chip-ID: 8086:9a0b rev: class-ID: 0104
Drives:
Local Storage: total: 476.94 GiB used: 397.56 GiB (83.4%)
SMART Message: Unable to run smartctl. Root privileges required.
ID-1: /dev/nvme0n1 maj-min: 259:0 vendor: Western Digital model: PC SN530
SDBPNPZ-512G-1114
size: 476.94 GiB block-size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B speed: 31.6
Gb/s lanes: 4 type: SSD
serial: <filter> rev: 21113000 temp: 41.9 C scheme: GPT
Partition:
ID-1: / raw-size: 476.69 GiB size: 468.13 GiB (98.21%) used: 397.56 GiB
(84.9%) fs: ext4
dev: /dev/nvme0n1p2 maj-min: 259:2
ID-2: /boot/efi raw-size: 256 MiB size: 252 MiB (98.46%) used: 274 KiB
(0.1%) fs: vfat
dev: /dev/nvme0n1p1 maj-min: 259:1
Swap:
Kernel: swappiness: 15 (default 60) cache-pressure: 100 (default)
ID-1: swap-1 type: file size: 4 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) priority: -2 file:
/swap/swap
Sensors:
System Temperatures: cpu: 32.0 C mobo: N/A
Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A
Repos:
Packages: pm: dpkg pkgs: 2360 libs: 1249 tools:
apt,apt-get,aptitude,nala,synaptic pm: rpm
pkgs: 0 pm: flatpak pkgs: 0
No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-updates main contrib
non-free non-free-firmware
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free
non-free-firmware
2: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security main
contrib non-free non-free-firmware
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list
1: deb http://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/mxlinux/mx/repo/ bookworm
main non-free
Info:
Processes: 315 Uptime: 19m wakeups: 2 Memory: 15.4 GiB used: 1.49 GiB
(9.7%) Init: SysVinit
v: 3.06 runlevel: 5 default: graphical tool: systemctl Compilers: gcc:
12.2.0 alt: 12
Client: shell wrapper v: 5.2.15-release inxi: 3.3.26
Boot Mode: UEFI
This is a beast compared to anything else I have here. :)
I'm fucking loving the responsiveness. The backlit fancy ass keyboard is
pretty fucking cool too. I will be adding a second hard drive to it
though... :)
--
I don't need no Dr. All I need...is my lawyer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-31 22:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68b4c99b$0$10365$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #181790 |
On Aug 31, 2025 at 2:03:05 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB34CAD7498169HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>: > Creon <creon@creon.earth> news:mh6mq9FsipdU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 26 > Aug 2025 21:21:14 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > > [snip Davids bullshit] > >> So he helps you out -- at your request -- and then you stab >> him in the back. > > I've helped his tech fucktard level ass out several times. You have helped and been helped. Likely been helped more than you have helped. But you also attack and lie and cry. > No more. Your tech incompetence was called out and now you run. Just as a reminder to you: * Gremlin was ignorant about how his phone number could show on my provider's logs. * Gremlin incorrectly denied his number was in public databases and could not understand that not all databases are the same. * Gremlin thought Unicode letter-like symbols were a different font. * Gremlin got confused over what degrees he says he has and what they mean. * Gremlin got confused over Preference files and profiles on macOS. * Gremlin got all excited he used a mouse-less computer as if that was impressive. * Gremlin could not believe FirstClass could handle so many simultaneous connections. * Gremlin did not realize the risks of writing to APFS on Linux. * Gremlin did not understand ASCII is a standard where "A" is always 65. * Gremlin was so ignorant of Linux he thought I was saying a DE and distro are the same. * Gremlin did not know that a floppy disk in a drive could stop a machine from booting. * Gremlin thought forwarding a Google Groups post gave headers it did not. * Gremlin thought he could best my chat bot but failed. * Gremlin confused drag-and-drop with copy-and-paste. * Gremlin thought an ugly superglue and baking powder hack for a hinge was indicative of the work a "hardware repair shop" would do. <675a4b34$1$2873014$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> > He can > fucking learn to swim or drown at this point. Few people posting here have > the tech chops that I do, and of those, I don't see anyone wanting to waste > their time to help him out. How does one with such amazing "tech chops" make the errors you do? You have some skills. David has some. I have some. Carroll has some. Why not celebrate our different areas and not compete? Why not help each other? Why not be kind and thoughtful, and not insecure and hate filled as you are? Can you try to do better? -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-14 15:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <107krnm$hgdn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #181676 |
On 13/08/2025 22:16, Tyrone wrote: <snip> >> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! > > AGAIN, why do you feel he needs to be "investigated"? Because he is ignorant of computers (admitted he's on a basic user), thinks he has stumbled on something new / different / suppocious and because of his general ignorance on the subject, is now on a crusade set by his imaginary controller to 'do something about the bad man', not realising this scenario is very similar to the vast majority of software out there he uses every day (well, in his case, only of a's a very simple WP and eSudoku ). > Based on what? Nothing at all. > Just > because YOU personally don't like him? I'm sure that's part but he doesn't really know himself, in the same way he doesn't know the Police keep taking him home when he's find in the local town with no trousers and shouting at pigeons. Cheers, T i m
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | uk.comp.sys.mac
csiph-web