Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #181561 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-08-05 12:38 +0100 |
| Last post | 2025-08-14 15:27 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 91 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to uk.comp.sys.mac
Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-05 12:38 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-06 00:06 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-06 05:58 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 11:19 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-08 12:55 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 15:39 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-08 17:21 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 19:13 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-08 12:29 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 21:40 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-08 13:51 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 21:58 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-08 21:30 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-08 23:01 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-09 14:05 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 18:54 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-09 21:09 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 22:47 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 20:06 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-08 15:18 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 09:50 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-09 09:15 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 18:58 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-09 13:15 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 22:49 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-09 15:38 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-10 09:46 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-10 12:41 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 20:09 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-13 12:32 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 21:58 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 22:12 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-13 14:54 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-11 19:08 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2025-08-10 09:07 -0400
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-10 12:41 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-08 22:07 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-08 15:37 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-08 22:57 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-08 13:56 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-09 04:48 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 09:44 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-11 19:08 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 10:01 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Creon <creon@creon.earth> - 2025-08-09 09:48 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 12:13 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com> - 2025-08-09 22:05 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-09 23:20 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-09 15:32 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 20:07 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-13 21:16 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-13 22:45 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-13 14:55 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> - 2025-08-13 20:09 -0500
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-14 08:58 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> - 2025-08-14 17:23 -0500
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-14 14:58 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-24 08:31 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> - 2025-08-24 17:55 -0500
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-25 08:28 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-25 07:02 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-25 17:46 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> - 2025-08-25 10:19 -0500
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-08-25 17:44 +0200
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-25 17:43 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-25 22:24 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-25 22:59 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-26 10:50 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 13:29 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-08-26 15:19 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 15:30 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 08:46 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 15:47 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2025-08-26 18:02 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-08-26 21:07 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-26 07:31 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 13:24 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-08-26 15:16 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-08-26 16:22 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Creon <creon@creon.earth> - 2025-08-26 21:21 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow "David B." <DavidB.@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-08-26 22:24 +0100
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-31 21:03 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-31 22:14 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 14:34 -0700
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-31 21:03 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-31 22:15 +0000
Re: Optimising performance with EtreCheckPro and Ulbow T i m <eternal@spaced.me.uk> - 2025-08-14 15:27 +0100
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-08 13:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <QOednShTnbkQ-Qv1nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #181587 |
David B. wrote: > On 08/08/2025 20:29, Alan wrote: >> On 2025-08-08 11:13, David B. wrote: >>> On 08/08/2025 18:21, Gremlin wrote: >>>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfm1aeFqc46U1@mid.individual.net >>>> Fri, >>>> 08 Aug 2025 10:19:58 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 06/08/2025 06:58, Gremlin wrote: >>>>>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfe8q5Fh1j1U1@mid.individual.net >>>>>> Tue, 05 Aug 2025 11:38:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >>>>>> >>>>>> This has already been resolved. There is no malware present in the >>>>>> software. You have already confirmed that you continue to infer >>>>>> that's >>>>>> not the case because the author will not engage with you. You are >>>>>> once >>>>>> again, knowingly dishonestly, sliming the product. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps you will categorically confirm that once one has given >>>>> EtreCheck >>>>> "Full Disk Access" one has *NOT* left an open backdoor? >>>> >>>> This nonsense has already been covered as well. I asked you several >>>> times >>>> why you didn't apply the same standards to a variety of other software >>>> companies who's software does the same thing. Including Apple. You >>>> danced >>>> around my question and finally responded with the reason, because >>>> the author >>>> won't correspond with you. That's never going to be a satisifactory >>>> answer >>>> for your implications and wrongful accusations that you continue to >>>> make >>>> against the software. >>>> >>>> Etrecheck is clean. Use it or don't use it. >>> >>> What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? >>> >>> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! >>> >> >> Has anyone investigated you? >> >> Oh wait! They have! > > THAT isn't difficult! > > *MY* persona has been depicted on LinkedIn for many, many, years. > > Here's what Mr Daniel showed about himself:- > https://i.ibb.co/bRRy3cwQ/Screenshot-2022-04-19-at-17-13-29.png > > Please help me understand why none of his other work can be identified. > > Thanks. > > -- > David B. > https://discussions.apple.com/profile/HunterBD/participation > > https://discussions.apple.com/thread/8331613?answerId=33198885022&sortBy=rank#33198885022 > > > > he hides to give you something to seek
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsB335D972BC3BCHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> |
| In reply to | #181587 |
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfn5lnF1jm9U1@mid.individual.net Fri, 08 Aug 2025 20:40:23 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > THAT isn't difficult! I did make it much easier some years back when I taught you about .NFO files :) You did go well out of your way to try and keep such a thing from happening to you though. You took deliberate action to have yourself deleted from the digital copies of what we would call a phone book here. Obviously, it didn't help you with me at the end of the day; I still found all the information you tried to keep away from me and others. You'd already pissed a lot of people off well before I ever met you. And you took those steps well before I met you, because, you have a very strong tendency of provoking people to the point where they digitally punch you in the mouth. > *MY* persona has been depicted on LinkedIn for many, many, years. Might as well at that point, especially after that lesson in .NFO files you got. Are those coppers of yours attempting to come get me via canoe? It sure is taking them a long time, David Brooks. > Please help me understand why none of his other work can be identified. Translation: I'm ignoring the fact I've been called out several times now for slander, sliming, and, stalking. But, I'm going to continue asking for help in better stalking my victim; all because he did the right thing and stopped communicating with you via email. David, did it ever occur to you that someone (not little ol me lol) may have sent him an email chat between yourself and another person where you faked asking for support with their product too? Maybe he noticed some similarities in those emails and the ones between you and him. Perhaps, as a result, he realized that you're actually a real life, batshit crazy, cyber stalking, fucktard, who never had any real support queries. You like to get personal with people via email; and you expect them to respond to you in a manner you find timely; fuck their time table, David is more important. Atleast, you think you are. Perhaps someone showed him what happens if they do answer all of your emails - Maybe they noticed that you attempted to dox someone because you didn't like the amount of time it was taking them to respond to you. Our email correspondence alone shows what a royal piece of shit you are, and how honest! i've been describing you and what you do. I'm certain that others have copies of emails between you and them that are along the same lines, because, you are you and you do the same shit you've been doing for years. Someone either needs to place their boot firmly upon your neck and put all of their weight on that foot, or sue the ever living shit out of you. Either way, at some point, one must go well outside of usenet to put an end to your idea of fun. > Thanks. > > -- > David B. > https://discussions.apple.com/profile/HunterBD/participation Is that yet another banned for forum policy violation accounts? How many have you had on that site alone, David? When are you going to learn that you don't have the right to access gear you do not own without permission? That you are infact, a fucking guest on such networks and your permission to use them can be revoked at any time. When are you going to learn to respect anothers property David? -- I don't need no Dr. All I need...is my lawyer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-09 04:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6896d33b$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #181599 |
On Aug 8, 2025 at 6:22:33 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB335D972BC3BCHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>: > "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfn5lnF1jm9U1@mid.individual.net Fri, > 08 Aug 2025 20:40:23 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > > >> THAT isn't difficult! > > I did make it much easier some years back when I taught you about .NFO files > :) > > You did go well out of your way to try and keep such a thing from happening > to you though. You took deliberate action to have yourself deleted from the > digital copies of what we would call a phone book here. Obviously, it didn't > help you with me at the end of the day; I still found all the information > you tried to keep away from me and others. You'd already pissed a lot of > people off well before I ever met you. And you took those steps well before > I met you, because, you have a very strong tendency of provoking people to > the point where they digitally punch you in the mouth. > >> *MY* persona has been depicted on LinkedIn for many, many, years. > > Might as well at that point, especially after that lesson in .NFO files you > got. Are those coppers of yours attempting to come get me via canoe? It sure > is taking them a long time, David Brooks. > >> Please help me understand why none of his other work can be identified. > > Translation: I'm ignoring the fact I've been called out several times now > for slander, sliming, and, stalking. But, I'm going to continue asking for > help in better stalking my victim; all because he did the right thing and > stopped communicating with you via email. > > David, did it ever occur to you that someone (not little ol me lol) may have > sent him an email chat between yourself and another person where you faked > asking for support with their product too? Maybe he noticed some > similarities in those emails and the ones between you and him. Perhaps, as a > result, he realized that you're actually a real life, batshit crazy, cyber > stalking, fucktard, who never had any real support queries. You like to get > personal with people via email; and you expect them to respond to you in a > manner you find timely; fuck their time table, David is more important. > Atleast, you think you are. > > Perhaps someone showed him what happens if they do answer all of your emails > - Maybe they noticed that you attempted to dox someone because you didn't > like the amount of time it was taking them to respond to you. > > Our email correspondence alone shows what a royal piece of shit you are, and > how honest! i've been describing you and what you do. I'm certain that > others have copies of emails between you and them that are along the same > lines, because, you are you and you do the same shit you've been doing for > years. > > Someone either needs to place their boot firmly upon your neck and put all > of their weight on that foot, or sue the ever living shit out of you. Either > way, at some point, one must go well outside of usenet to put an end to your > idea of fun. > > >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> David B. >> https://discussions.apple.com/profile/HunterBD/participation > > Is that yet another banned for forum policy violation accounts? How many > have you had on that site alone, David? > > When are you going to learn that you don't have the right to access gear you > do not own without permission? That you are infact, a fucking guest on such > networks and your permission to use them can be revoked at any time. When > are you going to learn to respect anothers property David? Innuendo noted. -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-09 09:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mfog2iF7cadU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181599 |
On 09/08/2025 02:22, Gremlin wrote: > "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfn5lnF1jm9U1@mid.individual.net Fri, > 08 Aug 2025 20:40:23 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > > >> THAT isn't difficult! > > I did make it much easier some years back when I taught you about .NFO files > :) > Might as well at that point, especially after that lesson in .NFO files you > got. Are those coppers of yours attempting to come get me via canoe? It sure > is taking them a long time, David Brooks. //.nfo files are frequently associated with the scene or warez community, which distributes pirated software and media. These files often contain information about the release, including the release group, date, and any special instructions.// Yes - you confirmed that you ARE a software pirate, and, for that, *you will reap your just rewards*! >> Please help me understand why none of his other work can be identified. > Someone either needs to place their boot firmly upon your neck and put all > of their weight on that foot, or sue the ever living shit out of you. Either > way, at some point, one must go well outside of usenet to put an end to your > idea of fun. It certainly not fun. As you have discovered for yourself, he's a 'Will o' the Wisp' and even you, Dustin Cook, can't identify the developer of EtreCheck! >> https://discussions.apple.com/profile/HunterBD/participation > > Is that yet another banned for forum policy violation accounts? I used that from day1 with my first Apple computer. > How many have you had on that site alone, David? DOZENS - since I was banned simply for asking searching questions! > When are you going to learn that you don't have the right to access gear you > do not own without permission? That you are infact, a fucking guest on such > networks and your permission to use them can be revoked at any time. When > are you going to learn to respect anothers property David? Ah! I was told it's OK to reinvent oneself by one of the gurus there - BDAqua. He's the powerhouse behind this BBS board:- https://www.x704.net/bbs/index.php?sid=bf2c01040ee9f70040165727b8326d57 Maybe you should explore there and dig up the truth! -- Enjoy your weekend! 🙂 David
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-11 19:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsB3389A197B319HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> |
| In reply to | #181603 |
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfog2iF7cadU1@mid.individual.net Sat, 09 Aug 2025 08:44:02 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > Yes - you confirmed that you ARE a software pirate, and, for that, > *you will reap your just rewards*! David, I disclosed that to you in the course of our emails; You had no problem with it at the time. Stop pretending that it's a big deal to you now, or that it actually ever was. You didn't give two shits about that, or my past activities. You were hoping to con me; you admitted as much here on usenet. > As you have discovered for yourself, he's a 'Will o' the Wisp' and even > you, Dustin Cook, can't identify the developer of EtreCheck! David, Has that reverse psy nonsense you like to use ever actually worked on anyone that wasn't a child in elementary school? Did you ever convince someone to 'prove you wrong' and do exactly what you wanted using this ruse? I can't think of a single time, as a child, that such a thing ever worked on me. Even as a kid, I wasn't that gullible. So sorry. :) > DOZENS - since I was banned simply for asking searching questions! FFS. You weren't banned for that. You were repeatedly banned for violating forum policies. Your idea of asking searching questions is a sad joke. >> When are you going to learn that you don't have the right to access >> gear you do not own without permission? That you are infact, a fucking >> guest on such networks and your permission to use them can be revoked >> at any time. When are you going to learn to respect anothers property >> David? > > Ah! I was told it's OK to reinvent oneself by one of the gurus there - > BDAqua. I'm sure you misunderstood what you were actually told, David. I seriously doubt any 'guru' there would suggest to you, or anyone else, that it's okay to violate forum policies and get banned only to create new ones. There wouldn't be any point in having any policies in the first place if that was the case. > He's the powerhouse behind this BBS board:- > > https://www.x704.net/bbs/index.php?sid=bf2c01040ee9f70040165727b8326d57 BBS? ROFL. You probably wouldn't know how to navigate an actual board. *IF* you ever used one in the first place. > Maybe you should explore there and dig up the truth! I've already disected the product you have an issue with, and as with the servers you lied to me about, found nothing amiss with it. I've told you this, several times. You ignore that, because it doesn't support the stories you like to spread about the software via your questions implying it's malicious. You and snit have that bullshit down pat. -- I don't need no Dr. All I need...is my lawyer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsB335D970E38B5HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> |
| In reply to | #181586 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> news:1075j7c$rso5$1@dont-email.me Fri, 08 Aug 2025 19:29:48 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On 2025-08-08 11:13, David B. wrote: >> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! >> > > Has anyone investigated you? Thoroughly. Anything specific you would like to know about him or his remaining living family? > Oh wait! They have! <G> You should ask him how he learned what an .NFO file is. Muahaha. > And they've found you to be a complete asshole! Yes! As well as a total piece of shit liar, notorious stalker, And, of course, a fucking troll. -- I don't need no Dr. All I need...is my lawyer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsB335D96F021A6HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> |
| In reply to | #181585 |
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfmt1uF87vU1@mid.individual.net Fri, 08 Aug 2025 18:13:18 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: > On 08/08/2025 18:21, Gremlin wrote: >> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfm1aeFqc46U1@mid.individual.net >> Fri, 08 Aug 2025 10:19:58 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >> >>> On 06/08/2025 06:58, Gremlin wrote: >>>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfe8q5Fh1j1U1@mid.individual.net >>>> Tue, 05 Aug 2025 11:38:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>> >>>>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >>>> >>>> This has already been resolved. There is no malware present in the >>>> software. You have already confirmed that you continue to infer >>>> that's not the case because the author will not engage with you. You >>>> are once again, knowingly dishonestly, sliming the product. >>> >>> Perhaps you will categorically confirm that once one has given >>> EtreCheck "Full Disk Access" one has *NOT* left an open backdoor? >> >> This nonsense has already been covered as well. I asked you several >> times why you didn't apply the same standards to a variety of other >> software companies who's software does the same thing. Including Apple. >> You danced around my question and finally responded with the reason, >> because the author won't correspond with you. That's never going to be >> a satisifactory answer for your implications and wrongful accusations >> that you continue to make against the software. >> >> Etrecheck is clean. Use it or don't use it. > > What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? WTF is wrong with you? Seriously, What the fuck is wrong with you? David, people do not have to respond to a single email you send. You are lucky any of us responds a single time, let alone has a 'discussion' (only to be abused by you later) with you of any kind. Stop attempting to slime legitimate software, David. You're a real piece of shit. > Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! WTF? Why would I 'investigate' him? After the outright bullshit you tried to feed me about those servers you wanted me to break into - you actually think I'd take anything you write about another person, company, or site, at face value? - And check into it/them based on your writings? And, After all the bullshit snit has written about me that you went well out of your way to give him cover for? To the point of agreeing with his known bullshit list about me... I've already told you, David Brooks, I will happily mock you, possibly even taunt you on occasion. But! I won't intentionally help you with any technical query until further notice. I have determined you didn't appreciate the help when it was offered based on how you've acted towards me. As a result, I will not help you further. -- I don't need no Dr. All I need...is my lawyer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-09 10:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mfoh36F7caeU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181597 |
On 09/08/2025 02:22, Gremlin did not answer David's valid question! [....] >> >> What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? > > WTF is wrong with you? Seriously, What the fuck is wrong with you? > David, people do not have to respond to a single email you send. You are > lucky any of us responds a single time, let alone has a 'discussion' (only > to be abused by you later) with you of any kind. Stop attempting to slime > legitimate software, David. You're a real piece of shit. No way! I'm asking valid questions and NOT getting answers. >> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! > > WTF? Why would I 'investigate' him? So even *YOU* cannot identify him. Got it! > I've already told you, David Brooks, I will happily mock you, possibly even > taunt you on occasion. But! I won't intentionally help you with any > technical query until further notice. I have determined you didn't > appreciate the help when it was offered based on how you've acted towards me. > As a result, I will not help you further. Some might think you are a cry-baby! -- David Enjoy your weekend! 🙂
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Creon <creon@creon.earth> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-09 09:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mfojreF3gt3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181605 |
On Sat, 9 Aug 2025 10:01:26 +0100, David B. wrote: > On 09/08/2025 02:22, Gremlin did not answer David's valid question! > [....] >>> >>> What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? >> >> WTF is wrong with you? Seriously, What the fuck is wrong with you? >> David, people do not have to respond to a single email you send. You >> are lucky any of us responds a single time, let alone has a >> 'discussion' (only to be abused by you later) with you of any kind. >> Stop attempting to slime legitimate software, David. You're a real >> piece of shit. > > No way! > > I'm asking valid questions and NOT getting answers. >>> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! >> >> WTF? Why would I 'investigate' him? > > So even *YOU* cannot identify him. Got it! >> I've already told you, David Brooks, I will happily mock you, possibly >> even taunt you on occasion. But! I won't intentionally help you with >> any technical query until further notice. I have determined you didn't >> appreciate the help when it was offered based on how you've acted >> towards me. >> As a result, I will not help you further. > > Some might think you are a cry-baby! What are you? Four? -- -c System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G OS: Linux 6.16.0 D: Mint 22.1 DE: Xfce 4.18 NVIDIA: 575.64.05 Mem: 258G "Patience is a virtue, it's just not one of my better virtues"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-09 12:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mfooraF9pi1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181606 |
On 09/08/2025 10:48, Creon wrote: > On Sat, 9 Aug 2025 10:01:26 +0100, David B. wrote: > >> On 09/08/2025 02:22, Gremlin did not answer David's valid question! >> [....] >>>> >>>> What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? >>> >>> WTF is wrong with you? Seriously, What the fuck is wrong with you? >>> David, people do not have to respond to a single email you send. You >>> are lucky any of us responds a single time, let alone has a >>> 'discussion' (only to be abused by you later) with you of any kind. >>> Stop attempting to slime legitimate software, David. You're a real >>> piece of shit. >> >> No way! >> >> I'm asking valid questions and NOT getting answers. >>>> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! >>> >>> WTF? Why would I 'investigate' him? >> >> So even *YOU* cannot identify him. Got it! >>> I've already told you, David Brooks, I will happily mock you, possibly >>> even taunt you on occasion. But! I won't intentionally help you with >>> any technical query until further notice. I have determined you didn't >>> appreciate the help when it was offered based on how you've acted >>> towards me. >>> As a result, I will not help you further. >> >> Some might think you are a cry-baby! > > What are you? Four? Please see item 11. here:- https://www.institute4learning.com/resources/articles/the-12-stages-of-life/ I also use Linux Mint 22.1 on my old 24 inch Apple iMac
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-09 22:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6897c624$11$21959$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #181606 |
On 9 Aug 2025 09:48:30 GMT, Creon wrote: > On Sat, 9 Aug 2025 10:01:26 +0100, David B. wrote: > >> On 09/08/2025 02:22, Gremlin did not answer David's valid question! >> [....] >>>> >>>> What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? >>> >>> WTF is wrong with you? Seriously, What the fuck is wrong with you? >>> David, people do not have to respond to a single email you send. You >>> are lucky any of us responds a single time, let alone has a >>> 'discussion' (only to be abused by you later) with you of any kind. >>> Stop attempting to slime legitimate software, David. You're a real >>> piece of shit. >> >> No way! >> >> I'm asking valid questions and NOT getting answers. >>>> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! >>> >>> WTF? Why would I 'investigate' him? >> >> So even *YOU* cannot identify him. Got it! >>> I've already told you, David Brooks, I will happily mock you, possibly >>> even taunt you on occasion. But! I won't intentionally help you with >>> any technical query until further notice. I have determined you didn't >>> appreciate the help when it was offered based on how you've acted >>> towards me. >>> As a result, I will not help you further. >> >> Some might think you are a cry-baby! > > What are you? Four? You give him too much credit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-09 23:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mfpvsvFf8ukU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181621 |
On 09/08/2025 23:05, Charlie Glock wrote: > On 9 Aug 2025 09:48:30 GMT, Creon wrote: > >> On Sat, 9 Aug 2025 10:01:26 +0100, David B. wrote: >> >>> On 09/08/2025 02:22, Gremlin did not answer David's valid question! >>> [....] >>>>> >>>>> What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? >>>> >>>> WTF is wrong with you? Seriously, What the fuck is wrong with you? >>>> David, people do not have to respond to a single email you send. You >>>> are lucky any of us responds a single time, let alone has a >>>> 'discussion' (only to be abused by you later) with you of any kind. >>>> Stop attempting to slime legitimate software, David. You're a real >>>> piece of shit. >>> >>> No way! >>> >>> I'm asking valid questions and NOT getting answers. >>>>> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! >>>> >>>> WTF? Why would I 'investigate' him? >>> >>> So even *YOU* cannot identify him. Got it! >>>> I've already told you, David Brooks, I will happily mock you, possibly >>>> even taunt you on occasion. But! I won't intentionally help you with >>>> any technical query until further notice. I have determined you didn't >>>> appreciate the help when it was offered based on how you've acted >>>> towards me. >>>> As a result, I will not help you further. >>> >>> Some might think you are a cry-baby! >> >> What are you? Four? > > You give him too much credit. Where do YOU sit, Charlie boy? https://i.ibb.co/xq6wgyG1/cid-62-C2583-C-7-EA3-44-AD-8-D1-D-99-F54-B0-EE07-E.jpg Do tell!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-09 15:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4qSdnUrSh6AHUQr1nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #181621 |
Charlie Glock wrote: > On 9 Aug 2025 09:48:30 GMT, Creon wrote: > >> On Sat, 9 Aug 2025 10:01:26 +0100, David B. wrote: >> >>> On 09/08/2025 02:22, Gremlin did not answer David's valid question! >>> [....] >>>>> >>>>> What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? >>>> >>>> WTF is wrong with you? Seriously, What the fuck is wrong with you? >>>> David, people do not have to respond to a single email you send. You >>>> are lucky any of us responds a single time, let alone has a >>>> 'discussion' (only to be abused by you later) with you of any kind. >>>> Stop attempting to slime legitimate software, David. You're a real >>>> piece of shit. >>> >>> No way! >>> >>> I'm asking valid questions and NOT getting answers. >>>>> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! >>>> >>>> WTF? Why would I 'investigate' him? >>> >>> So even *YOU* cannot identify him. Got it! >>>> I've already told you, David Brooks, I will happily mock you, possibly >>>> even taunt you on occasion. But! I won't intentionally help you with >>>> any technical query until further notice. I have determined you didn't >>>> appreciate the help when it was offered based on how you've acted >>>> towards me. >>>> As a result, I will not help you further. >>> >>> Some might think you are a cry-baby! >> >> What are you? Four? > > You give him too much credit. > and he takes your credit away
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-13 20:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mg4642F6tekU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181585 |
On 08/08/2025 19:13, David B. wrote: > On 08/08/2025 18:21, Gremlin wrote: >> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfm1aeFqc46U1@mid.individual.net Fri, >> 08 Aug 2025 10:19:58 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >> >>> On 06/08/2025 06:58, Gremlin wrote: >>>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfe8q5Fh1j1U1@mid.individual.net >>>> Tue, 05 Aug 2025 11:38:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>> >>>>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >>>> >>>> This has already been resolved. There is no malware present in the >>>> software. You have already confirmed that you continue to infer that's >>>> not the case because the author will not engage with you. You are once >>>> again, knowingly dishonestly, sliming the product. >>> >>> Perhaps you will categorically confirm that once one has given EtreCheck >>> "Full Disk Access" one has *NOT* left an open backdoor? >> >> This nonsense has already been covered as well. I asked you several times >> why you didn't apply the same standards to a variety of other software >> companies who's software does the same thing. Including Apple. You danced >> around my question and finally responded with the reason, because the >> author >> won't correspond with you. That's never going to be a satisifactory >> answer >> for your implications and wrongful accusations that you continue to make >> against the software. >> >> Etrecheck is clean. Use it or don't use it. > > What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? > > Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! *BUMP*!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tyrone <none@none.none> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-13 21:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <iSSdnb4cs5BbnQD1nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@supernews.com> |
| In reply to | #181585 |
On Aug 8, 2025 at 2:13:18 PM EDT, ""David B."" <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > On 08/08/2025 18:21, Gremlin wrote: >> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfm1aeFqc46U1@mid.individual.net Fri, >> 08 Aug 2025 10:19:58 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >> >>> On 06/08/2025 06:58, Gremlin wrote: >>>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfe8q5Fh1j1U1@mid.individual.net >>>> Tue, 05 Aug 2025 11:38:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>> >>>>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >>>> >>>> This has already been resolved. There is no malware present in the >>>> software. You have already confirmed that you continue to infer that's >>>> not the case because the author will not engage with you. You are once >>>> again, knowingly dishonestly, sliming the product. >>> >>> Perhaps you will categorically confirm that once one has given EtreCheck >>> "Full Disk Access" one has *NOT* left an open backdoor? >> >> This nonsense has already been covered as well. I asked you several times >> why you didn't apply the same standards to a variety of other software >> companies who's software does the same thing. Including Apple. You danced >> around my question and finally responded with the reason, because the author >> won't correspond with you. That's never going to be a satisifactory answer >> for your implications and wrongful accusations that you continue to make >> against the software. >> >> Etrecheck is clean. Use it or don't use it. > > What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? > > Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! AGAIN, why do you feel he needs to be "investigated"? Based on what? Just because YOU personally don't like him?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-13 22:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mg4fbfF855bU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181676 |
On 13/08/2025 22:16, Tyrone wrote: > On Aug 8, 2025 at 2:13:18 PM EDT, ""David B."" <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 08/08/2025 18:21, Gremlin wrote: >>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfm1aeFqc46U1@mid.individual.net Fri, >>> 08 Aug 2025 10:19:58 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>> >>>> On 06/08/2025 06:58, Gremlin wrote: >>>>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfe8q5Fh1j1U1@mid.individual.net >>>>> Tue, 05 Aug 2025 11:38:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >>>>> >>>>> This has already been resolved. There is no malware present in the >>>>> software. You have already confirmed that you continue to infer that's >>>>> not the case because the author will not engage with you. You are once >>>>> again, knowingly dishonestly, sliming the product. >>>> >>>> Perhaps you will categorically confirm that once one has given EtreCheck >>>> "Full Disk Access" one has *NOT* left an open backdoor? >>> >>> This nonsense has already been covered as well. I asked you several times >>> why you didn't apply the same standards to a variety of other software >>> companies who's software does the same thing. Including Apple. You danced >>> around my question and finally responded with the reason, because the author >>> won't correspond with you. That's never going to be a satisifactory answer >>> for your implications and wrongful accusations that you continue to make >>> against the software. >>> >>> Etrecheck is clean. Use it or don't use it. >> >> What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? >> >> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! > > AGAIN, why do you feel he needs to be "investigated"? Based on what? Just > because YOU personally don't like him? Back in 2014 I was happily helping him *test* his product. I still have copies of our email correspondence! He has also confirmed that he's about the same age as my son. Maybe that's why he's been unable to to best me! ;-) I've never claimed not to like the fellow! Other folk were slating the product on the Apple App Store, not me! https://i.ibb.co/6RyCVF5h/4-DB889-D8-A144-4-A99-97-B5-C02-B46-CF96-A9-1-105-c.jpg Do YOU think he became too greedy?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-13 14:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <107j1jk$4fjn$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #181677 |
On 2025-08-13 14:45, David B. wrote: > On 13/08/2025 22:16, Tyrone wrote: >> On Aug 8, 2025 at 2:13:18 PM EDT, ""David B."" <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> On 08/08/2025 18:21, Gremlin wrote: >>>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfm1aeFqc46U1@mid.individual.net >>>> Fri, >>>> 08 Aug 2025 10:19:58 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 06/08/2025 06:58, Gremlin wrote: >>>>>> "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mfe8q5Fh1j1U1@mid.individual.net >>>>>> Tue, 05 Aug 2025 11:38:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> There a question, too, about it possibly being "Malware"! >>>>>> >>>>>> This has already been resolved. There is no malware present in the >>>>>> software. You have already confirmed that you continue to infer >>>>>> that's >>>>>> not the case because the author will not engage with you. You are >>>>>> once >>>>>> again, knowingly dishonestly, sliming the product. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps you will categorically confirm that once one has given >>>>> EtreCheck >>>>> "Full Disk Access" one has *NOT* left an open backdoor? >>>> >>>> This nonsense has already been covered as well. I asked you several >>>> times >>>> why you didn't apply the same standards to a variety of other software >>>> companies who's software does the same thing. Including Apple. You >>>> danced >>>> around my question and finally responded with the reason, because >>>> the author >>>> won't correspond with you. That's never going to be a satisifactory >>>> answer >>>> for your implications and wrongful accusations that you continue to >>>> make >>>> against the software. >>>> >>>> Etrecheck is clean. Use it or don't use it. >>> >>> What about "John Daniel" - is HE "clean"? >>> >>> Have you even /bothered/ to investigate him?!! >> >> AGAIN, why do you feel he needs to be "investigated"? Based on what? >> Just >> because YOU personally don't like him? > > > Back in 2014 I was happily helping him *test* his product. I still have > copies of our email correspondence! > > He has also confirmed that he's about the same age as my son. Maybe > that's why he's been unable to to best me! ;-) > > I've never claimed not to like the fellow! > > Other folk were slating the product on the Apple App Store, not me! > > https://i.ibb.co/6RyCVF5h/4-DB889-D8-A144-4-A99-97-B5-C02-B46-CF96- > A9-1-105-c.jpg > > Do YOU think he became too greedy? > > I'd say I think you became too much an asshole... ...but you were quite clearly always an asshole.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-13 20:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <eldq9kd7bd3v5l41kvp68d687sr0mcv2qi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #181677 |
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:45:19 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >On 13/08/2025 22:16, Tyrone wrote: >> AGAIN, why do you feel he needs to be "investigated"? Based on what? Just >> because YOU personally don't like him? > > >Back in 2014 I was happily helping him *test* his product. I still have >copies of our email correspondence! How long before you dragged Nick into it? Wait, never mind! >He has also confirmed that he's about the same age as my son. Ugh! Pathetic, but at least you're predictably pathetic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-14 08:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mg5j9dFdjs5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #181680 |
On 14/08/2025 02:09, Kelly Phillips wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:45:19 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 13/08/2025 22:16, Tyrone wrote: >>> AGAIN, why do you feel he needs to be "investigated"? Based on what? Just >>> because YOU personally don't like him? >> >> >> Back in 2014 I was happily helping him *test* his product. I still have >> copies of our email correspondence! > > How long before you dragged Nick into it? Wait, never mind! > >> He has also confirmed that he's about the same age as my son. > > Ugh! Pathetic, but at least you're predictably pathetic. My *surviving* son, a retired Squadron Leader RAF, is now in his mid fifties. Carry on. Btw, FYI ..... https://open.endole.co.uk/insight/company/SC500971-canimaan-software-ltd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kelly Phillips <KFile@podcasts.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-14 17:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <deos9kd02gm7g36i2ir354126p8aifi2mn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #181681 |
On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:58:37 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >On 14/08/2025 02:09, Kelly Phillips wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:45:19 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> On 13/08/2025 22:16, Tyrone wrote: >>>> AGAIN, why do you feel he needs to be "investigated"? Based on what? Just >>>> because YOU personally don't like him? >>> >>> >>> Back in 2014 I was happily helping him *test* his product. I still have >>> copies of our email correspondence! >> >> How long before you dragged Nick into it? Wait, never mind! >> >>> He has also confirmed that he's about the same age as my son. >> >> Ugh! Pathetic, but at least you're predictably pathetic. > >My *surviving* son, <snip> Only if you can explain the relevance.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | uk.comp.sys.mac
csiph-web