Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #180030 > unrolled thread

Temporarily ignore Time Machine destination

Started byD.M. Procida <daniele-at-vurt-dot-org@invalid.com>
First post2025-01-11 09:18 +0000
Last post2025-01-12 23:05 +0000
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to uk.comp.sys.mac


Contents

  Temporarily ignore Time Machine destination D.M. Procida <daniele-at-vurt-dot-org@invalid.com> - 2025-01-11 09:18 +0000
    Re: Temporarily ignore Time Machine destination Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@usually.sessile.org> - 2025-01-11 10:10 +0000
      Re: Temporarily ignore Time Machine destination D.M. Procida <daniele-at-vurt-dot-org@invalid.com> - 2025-01-11 11:49 +0000
        Re: Temporarily ignore Time Machine destination TimS <tim@streater.me.uk> - 2025-01-11 13:40 +0000
        Re: Temporarily ignore Time Machine destination Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@usually.sessile.org> - 2025-01-12 23:05 +0000

#180030 — Temporarily ignore Time Machine destination

FromD.M. Procida <daniele-at-vurt-dot-org@invalid.com>
Date2025-01-11 09:18 +0000
SubjectTemporarily ignore Time Machine destination
Message-ID<luerbuFj438U1@mid.individual.net>
Sometimes I want Time Machine to ignore a certain destination for a few weeks
(while I'm away, for example) so that it doesn't waste time trying to use it,
and I don't get spurious warnings.

There's no concept for this exposed in the Time Machine settings interface -
what's the best way to achieve it?

Daniele

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#180031

FromJaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@usually.sessile.org>
Date2025-01-11 10:10 +0000
Message-ID<lueucfFjjccU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#180030
On 11 Jan 2025 at 09:18:54 GMT, "D.M. Procida"
<daniele-at-vurt-dot-org@invalid.com> wrote:

> Sometimes I want Time Machine to ignore a certain destination for a few weeks
> (while I'm away, for example) so that it doesn't waste time trying to use it,
> and I don't get spurious warnings.
> 
> There's no concept for this exposed in the Time Machine settings interface -
> what's the best way to achieve it?
> 
> Daniele

As far as I know, nothing other than removing it from TM settings then
adding it back again later.

It's quite tedious, I'm so bored of the TM icon lying that I'm not
backed up, and Apple ignoring my annual new-macOS bug reports about it
for the last decade.

    Cheers - Jaimie
-- 
I hope I live long enough
to vindicate my pessimism 
       -- http://www.boasas.com/?c=1108

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#180033

FromD.M. Procida <daniele-at-vurt-dot-org@invalid.com>
Date2025-01-11 11:49 +0000
Message-ID<luf46mFkghpU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#180031
On 11 Jan 2025 at 10:10:23 GMT, "Jaimie Vandenbergh"
<jaimie@usually.sessile.org> wrote:

> On 11 Jan 2025 at 09:18:54 GMT, "D.M. Procida"
> <daniele-at-vurt-dot-org@invalid.com> wrote:
> 
>> Sometimes I want Time Machine to ignore a certain destination for a few weeks
>> (while I'm away, for example) so that it doesn't waste time trying to use it,
>> and I don't get spurious warnings.
>> 
>> There's no concept for this exposed in the Time Machine settings interface -
>> what's the best way to achieve it?

> As far as I know, nothing other than removing it from TM settings then
> adding it back again later.

Did you ever run into an issue where it would refuse to acknowledge the
forgotten backup when you tried to do that?

> It's quite tedious, I'm so bored of the TM icon lying that I'm not
> backed up, and Apple ignoring my annual new-macOS bug reports about it
> for the last decade.

The whole Time Machine machinery itself seems to have been forgotten by Apple.
They got it fundamentally working about 15 years ago, and seem to have
decided: good enough, let's leave it like that.

Daniele

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#180038

FromTimS <tim@streater.me.uk>
Date2025-01-11 13:40 +0000
Message-ID<lufalrFlhqpU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#180033
On 11 Jan 2025 at 11:49:42 GMT, "D.M. Procida"
<daniele-at-vurt-dot-org@invalid.com> wrote:

> The whole Time Machine machinery itself seems to have been forgotten by Apple.
> They got it fundamentally working about 15 years ago, and seem to have
> decided: good enough, let's leave it like that.

You sure? It seems to me they've removed the ability to restore to your chosen
spot and also gone in for snapshots (full backups) every time instead of
incremental backups made to look like full ones by a clever use of hard links.

-- 
Tim

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#180040

FromJaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@usually.sessile.org>
Date2025-01-12 23:05 +0000
Message-ID<luj05mF9727U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#180033
On 11 Jan 2025 at 11:49:42 GMT, "D.M. Procida"
<daniele-at-vurt-dot-org@invalid.com> wrote:

> On 11 Jan 2025 at 10:10:23 GMT, "Jaimie Vandenbergh"
> <jaimie@usually.sessile.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 11 Jan 2025 at 09:18:54 GMT, "D.M. Procida"
>> <daniele-at-vurt-dot-org@invalid.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Sometimes I want Time Machine to ignore a certain destination for a few weeks
>>> (while I'm away, for example) so that it doesn't waste time trying to use it,
>>> and I don't get spurious warnings.
>>> 
>>> There's no concept for this exposed in the Time Machine settings interface -
>>> what's the best way to achieve it?
> 
>> As far as I know, nothing other than removing it from TM settings then
>> adding it back again later.
> 
> Did you ever run into an issue where it would refuse to acknowledge the
> forgotten backup when you tried to do that?

I think perhaps once? Not recently, maybe five years back.

>> It's quite tedious, I'm so bored of the TM icon lying that I'm not
>> backed up, and Apple ignoring my annual new-macOS bug reports about it
>> for the last decade.
> 
> The whole Time Machine machinery itself seems to have been forgotten by Apple.
> They got it fundamentally working about 15 years ago, and seem to have
> decided: good enough, let's leave it like that.

They did the "okay so obviously we wrote TM originally to use ZFS
snapshots then didn't do ZFS so had to do it the hard way with directory
hardlinks; but now we have APFS snapshots so we can finally use
snapshots yaaaay" a few years back. Requires starting a new backup
though, so it can format the destination to APFS.

    Cheers - Jaimie
-- 
...there should be a feature added to the RAID 0 standard
stating that if anyone selects RAID 0 as an option, they
must type in, "I know what I am doing and that it is wrong" before they can proceed.
          - Archangel Mychael, ArsTechnica comments

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | uk.comp.sys.mac


csiph-web