Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #127700 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-22 21:26 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 220 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to uk.comp.sys.mac
Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-22 21:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-01-22 21:29 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-22 21:40 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Ray <amos.jones@outlook.com> - 2019-01-23 08:01 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 09:28 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 08:29 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Bob Campbell <none@none.none> - 2019-01-23 09:31 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 17:49 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 14:37 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 08:17 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 17:22 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 10:46 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 18:02 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 14:37 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 12:53 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 20:29 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2019-01-23 20:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 20:57 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 17:06 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 22:02 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 23:43 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 18:54 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 23:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-24 01:18 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 22:04 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-24 10:57 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-24 05:53 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 21:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 21:48 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 23:11 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 18:24 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-24 00:03 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Bob Campbell <none@none.none> - 2019-01-23 19:12 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-24 00:16 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 19:24 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Bob Campbell <none@none.none> - 2019-01-24 00:20 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-01-25 13:11 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-24 01:11 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 13:48 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 15:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 10:50 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-25 10:10 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 22:16 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-01-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-27 14:25 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 16:00 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 16:23 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 18:16 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 18:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 19:37 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 23:41 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:25 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 14:38 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:44 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 15:50 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:58 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 16:07 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:08 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 16:13 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:15 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 16:36 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:13 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 21:04 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 16:10 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 00:20 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 00:30 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 01:23 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:10 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-26 12:08 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-26 12:07 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 20:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 15:36 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-27 08:19 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-26 12:06 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:09 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> - 2019-01-25 21:06 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 08:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> - 2019-01-26 12:05 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:05 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 19:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 15:16 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> - 2019-01-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 20:48 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 16:10 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 00:17 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 00:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 01:22 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 18:13 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 19:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 12:30 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 12:39 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 13:11 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:25 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 14:40 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:44 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 15:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:38 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:38 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-26 08:53 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:58 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:32 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 15:54 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:58 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 15:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-27 22:44 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 09:30 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 11:41 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 17:15 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 09:22 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 18:43 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 10:55 -0800
OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 19:19 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 11:28 -0800
Re: OT? Not really! Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 20:00 -0200
TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 23:12 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 00:03 +0000
Re: TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 16:40 -0800
Re: TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-05 07:16 -0200
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 09:41 +0000
Re: TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-05 07:56 -0200
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 10:17 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 10:47 +0000
Re: TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-05 18:52 -0800
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 10:21 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 10:45 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-08 11:33 -0200
Re: [OT]TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-08 10:47 -0800
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-09 07:28 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-09 08:22 +0000
Re: TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-09 15:02 -0800
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-10 00:16 -0200
Re: [OT]TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-10 08:24 -0800
Re: [OT]TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 08:13 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:47 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 12:30 -0300
Re: [OT]TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 12:42 -0300
Re: [OT]TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 08:13 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 08:32 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 10:00 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 12:08 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 12:00 -0300
Re: TROLL post Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:11 -0600
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-13 19:58 -0800
Re: TROLL post Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:16 -0600
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:53 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 14:59 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 13:57 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 19:58 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 19:56 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 23:05 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:38 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-03 18:56 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 23:47 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 23:55 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 16:43 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 12:39 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-02-08 11:42 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-08 11:04 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 19:14 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-02-08 15:16 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 23:01 +0000
Re: [OT]Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-10 00:09 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 08:14 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 08:35 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 10:00 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 11:01 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 17:42 +0000
Re: [OT]Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 17:15 -0300
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-09 07:28 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:44 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 13:12 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 19:52 -0200
TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 23:25 +0000
Re: TROLL post Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 20:33 -0800
Re: TROLL post Wolffan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2019-01-28 23:54 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 00:31 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 16:42 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-04 19:45 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-05 07:51 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 09:54 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:50 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-03 18:56 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 00:05 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-03 19:07 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 00:56 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 09:07 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 14:48 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 13:36 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 15:10 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 09:39 -0200
TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 11:50 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 11:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260120191108524813%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #127812 |
In article <jB%2E.59733$fn2.33325@fx12.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount > >>> of space. they can be ignored > >> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free > >> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. > > > > those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free > > trial is theft. > > You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! they are inert.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 16:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5H%2E.61005$fn2.34178@fx12.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127813 |
On 26/01/2019 16:08, nospam wrote: > In article <jB%2E.59733$fn2.33325@fx12.fr7>, David B. < > B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount >>>>> of space. they can be ignored >>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free >>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. >>> >>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free >>> trial is theft. >> >> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! > > they are inert. They prevent a procedure - just like a *Rootkit*! -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 11:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260120191115348950%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #127815 |
In article <5H%2E.61005$fn2.34178@fx12.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount > >>>>> of space. they can be ignored > >>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free > >>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. > >>> > >>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free > >>> trial is theft. > >> > >> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! > > > > they are inert. > > They prevent a procedure - just like a *Rootkit*! nonsense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 16:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <S%%2E.92518$am2.24266@fx14.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127816 |
On 26/01/2019 16:15, nospam wrote: > In article <5H%2E.61005$fn2.34178@fx12.fr7>, David B. < > B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount >>>>>>> of space. they can be ignored >>>>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free >>>>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. >>>>> >>>>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free >>>>> trial is theft. >>>> >>>> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! >>> >>> they are inert. >> >> They prevent a procedure - just like a *Rootkit*! > > nonsense. The user of the computer has no idea that files have been left on their machine. Such files COULD do all kinds of nefarious things and the user would never know anything about it. -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 11:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260120191139335298%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #127818 |
In article <S%%2E.92518$am2.24266@fx14.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount > >>>>>>> of space. they can be ignored > >>>>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free > >>>>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. > >>>>> > >>>>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free > >>>>> trial is theft. > >>>> > >>>> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! > >>> > >>> they are inert. > >> > >> They prevent a procedure - just like a *Rootkit*! > > > > nonsense. > > The user of the computer has no idea that files have been left on their > machine. Such files COULD do all kinds of nefarious things and the user > would never know anything about it. no. if you think a rootkit is in any way comparable to limiting free trials to only once and preventing people from stealing software, an activity you clearly have no issues in doing, then you have no morals or ethics and are dumber than originally thought (which already is pretty low).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 17:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gb3iqaFc4kdU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127818 |
On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 26/01/2019 16:15, nospam wrote: >> In article <5H%2E.61005$fn2.34178@fx12.fr7>, David B. < >> B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount >>>>>>>> of space. they can be ignored >>>>>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free >>>>>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. >>>>>> >>>>>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free >>>>>> trial is theft. >>>>> >>>>> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! >>>> >>>> they are inert. >>> >>> They prevent a procedure - just like a *Rootkit*! >> >> nonsense. > > The user of the computer has no idea that files have been left on their > machine. Such files COULD do all kinds of nefarious things and the user > would never know anything about it. Nonsense. Preferences files are not executable. They will do *nothing* while they exist on the system. If it's installed, ClamXAV will read them. That's it. Nothing nefarious is going on in this scenario. You have a stick up your ass regarding ClamXAV. Your petty, little childish attacks on it are obvious and lame. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 21:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cX33E.92615$am2.26789@fx14.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127825 |
On 26/01/2019 17:13, Jolly Roger wrote: > On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> On 26/01/2019 16:15, nospam wrote: >>> In article <5H%2E.61005$fn2.34178@fx12.fr7>, David B. < >>> B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount >>>>>>>>> of space. they can be ignored >>>>>>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free >>>>>>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free >>>>>>> trial is theft. >>>>>> >>>>>> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! >>>>> >>>>> they are inert. >>>> >>>> They prevent a procedure - just like a *Rootkit*! >>> >>> nonsense. >> >> The user of the computer has no idea that files have been left on their >> machine. Such files COULD do all kinds of nefarious things and the user >> would never know anything about it. > > Nonsense. Preferences files are not executable. They will do *nothing* > while they exist on the system. I'll accept what you say about them. > If it's installed, ClamXAV will read > them. That's it. Nothing nefarious is going on in this scenario. You > have a stick up your ass regarding ClamXAV. Your petty, little childish > attacks on it are obvious and lame. I don't believe you have any clue what ClamXAV may have put ON to your machine, nor know - for sure - what it may leave behind if you you use it's uninstall tool to remove it. I'll listen if you'd like to explain *WHO* or *WHAT* actually DOES check to see. -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 16:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260120191610572361%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #127836 |
In article <cX33E.92615$am2.26789@fx14.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny > >>>>>>>>> amount > >>>>>>>>> of space. they can be ignored > >>>>>>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free > >>>>>>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free > >>>>>>> trial is theft. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! > >>>>> > >>>>> they are inert. > >>>> > >>>> They prevent a procedure - just like a *Rootkit*! > >>> > >>> nonsense. > >> > >> The user of the computer has no idea that files have been left on their > >> machine. Such files COULD do all kinds of nefarious things and the user > >> would never know anything about it. > > > > Nonsense. Preferences files are not executable. They will do *nothing* > > while they exist on the system. > > I'll accept what you say about them. except that you don't. > > If it's installed, ClamXAV will read > > them. That's it. Nothing nefarious is going on in this scenario. You > > have a stick up your ass regarding ClamXAV. Your petty, little childish > > attacks on it are obvious and lame. > > I don't believe you have any clue what ClamXAV may have put ON to your > machine, nor know - for sure - what it may leave behind if you you use > it's uninstall tool to remove it. i'm pretty sure jolly roger knows quite well what was put on and left over by any app and how to check exactly what that might be. > I'll listen if you'd like to explain *WHO* or *WHAT* actually DOES check > to see. that's a complete waste of time since you wouldn't understand a word of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 00:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gb4br3Fh6skU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127836 |
On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 26/01/2019 17:13, Jolly Roger wrote: >> >> Nonsense. Preferences files are not executable. They will do >> *nothing* while they exist on the system. > > I'll accept what you say about them. > >> If it's installed, ClamXAV will read them. That's it. Nothing >> nefarious is going on in this scenario. You have a stick up your ass >> regarding ClamXAV. Your petty, little childish attacks on it are >> obvious and lame. > > I don't believe you have any clue what ClamXAV may have put ON to your > machine You're wrong. It's not hard to figure out. > nor know - for sure - what it may leave behind if you you use it's > uninstall tool to remove it. Wrong again. That's also not hard to figure out. > I'll listen if you'd like to explain *WHO* or *WHAT* actually DOES > check to see. I don't care whether you listen or not. Stay stupid for all I care. You're clearly not going to stop your harassment campaign regardless of what anyone says. You're pathetic. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 00:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <IY63E.34089$yK.1318@fx06.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127847 |
On 27/01/2019 00:20, Jolly Roger wrote: > On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> On 26/01/2019 17:13, Jolly Roger wrote: >>> >>> Nonsense. Preferences files are not executable. They will do >>> *nothing* while they exist on the system. >> >> I'll accept what you say about them. >> >>> If it's installed, ClamXAV will read them. That's it. Nothing >>> nefarious is going on in this scenario. You have a stick up your ass >>> regarding ClamXAV. Your petty, little childish attacks on it are >>> obvious and lame. >> >> I don't believe you have any clue what ClamXAV may have put ON to your >> machine > > You're wrong. It's not hard to figure out. Check! >> nor know - for sure - what it may leave behind if you you use it's >> uninstall tool to remove it. > > Wrong again. That's also not hard to figure out. Then CHECK! >> I'll listen if you'd like to explain *WHO* or *WHAT* actually DOES >> check to see. Please answer the question! Can you not see that your head is buried in the sand? > I don't care whether you listen or not. Stay stupid for all I care. > You're clearly not going to stop your harassment campaign regardless of > what anyone says. You're pathetic. Sorry :-( https://i.imgur.com/ehnp4m0.jpg -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 01:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gb4fh5Fh6skU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127849 |
On 2019-01-27, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 27/01/2019 00:20, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> On 26/01/2019 17:13, Jolly Roger wrote: >>>> >>>> Nonsense. Preferences files are not executable. They will do >>>> *nothing* while they exist on the system. >>> >>> I'll accept what you say about them. >>> >>>> If it's installed, ClamXAV will read them. That's it. Nothing >>>> nefarious is going on in this scenario. You have a stick up your ass >>>> regarding ClamXAV. Your petty, little childish attacks on it are >>>> obvious and lame. >>> >>> I don't believe you have any clue what ClamXAV may have put ON to your >>> machine >> >> You're wrong. It's not hard to figure out. > > Check! > >>> nor know - for sure - what it may leave behind if you you use it's >>> uninstall tool to remove it. >> >> Wrong again. That's also not hard to figure out. > > Then CHECK! > >>> I'll listen if you'd like to explain *WHO* or *WHAT* actually DOES >>> check to see. > > Please answer the question! Sure, right after you suck a dick. Later. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 17:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gb3ijpFc4kdU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127815 |
On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 26/01/2019 16:08, nospam wrote: >> In article <jB%2E.59733$fn2.33325@fx12.fr7>, David B. < >> B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount >>>>>> of space. they can be ignored >>>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free >>>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. >>>> >>>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free >>>> trial is theft. >>> >>> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! >> >> they are inert. > > They prevent a procedure - just like a *Rootkit*! LOL... You really are an idiot. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 12:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <q2ienu$e1t$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #127815 |
On 2019-01-26 8:13 a.m., David B. wrote: > On 26/01/2019 16:08, nospam wrote: >> In article <jB%2E.59733$fn2.33325@fx12.fr7>, David B. < >> B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount >>>>>> of space. they can be ignored >>>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free >>>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. >>>> >>>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free >>>> trial is theft. >>> >>> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! >> >> they are inert. > > They prevent a procedure - just like a *Rootkit*! > Nope. A program sees their presence and acts according to the way it was designed by refusing to run further. You're saying the equivalent of claiming a stop sign is actively doing something when drivers choose to stop because of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 12:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <q2ielo$e1t$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #127812 |
On 2019-01-26 8:07 a.m., David B. wrote: > On 26/01/2019 15:58, nospam *THE TROLL* lied again... > >> In article <1l%2E.133610$Yn2.116138@fx26.fr7>, David B. < >> B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>>>>>> YOU have refused to search your computer with EasyFind. You >>>>>>> therefore >>>>>>> cannot be sure there are no remnants residing on your relevant >>>>>>> machine. >>>>>> >>>>>> it doesn't matter if there is or not. remnants are *inert*. >>>>> >>>>> That isn't true. >>>> >>>> it absolutely is true. >>> >>> You are wrong - *AGAIN*! >> >> nope. >> >>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount >>>> of space. they can be ignored >>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free >>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. >> >> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free >> trial is theft. > > You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! > They are inert. The software that looks for their presence is the actor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 20:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9m33E.50866$4r2.26068@fx25.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127829 |
On 26/01/2019 20:07, Alan Baker wrote: > On 2019-01-26 8:07 a.m., David B. wrote: >> On 26/01/2019 15:58, nospam *THE TROLL* lied again... >> >>> In article <1l%2E.133610$Yn2.116138@fx26.fr7>, David B. < >>> B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> YOU have refused to search your computer with EasyFind. You >>>>>>>> therefore >>>>>>>> cannot be sure there are no remnants residing on your relevant >>>>>>>> machine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> it doesn't matter if there is or not. remnants are *inert*. >>>>>> >>>>>> That isn't true. >>>>> >>>>> it absolutely is true. >>>> >>>> You are wrong - *AGAIN*! >>> >>> nope. >>> >>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount >>>>> of space. they can be ignored >>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free >>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. >>> >>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free >>> trial is theft. >> >> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! >> > > They are inert. > > The software that looks for their presence is the actor. Thank you. I'm learning every day! :-) Now then - what looks for the presence of any OTHER files, those which may *not* be inert? In other words, who/what checks the AV software once it has been voluntarily installed? *Who checks the checker*? -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 15:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260120191536429093%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #127833 |
In article <9m33E.50866$4r2.26068@fx25.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount > >>>>> of space. they can be ignored > >>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free > >>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. > >>> > >>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free > >>> trial is theft. > >> > >> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! > >> > > > > They are inert. > > > > The software that looks for their presence is the actor. > > Thank you. I'm learning every day! :-) you very definitely are not. > Now then - what looks for the presence of any OTHER files, those which > may *not* be inert? there aren't any, because the user deleted the non-inert app. > In other words, who/what checks the AV software once it has been > voluntarily installed? > > *Who checks the checker*? yep, you haven't learned a thing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 08:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <q2klmv$7nr$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #127833 |
On 2019-01-26 12:24 p.m., David B. wrote: > On 26/01/2019 20:07, Alan Baker wrote: >> On 2019-01-26 8:07 a.m., David B. wrote: >>> On 26/01/2019 15:58, nospam *THE TROLL* lied again... >>> >>>> In article <1l%2E.133610$Yn2.116138@fx26.fr7>, David B. < >>>> B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> YOU have refused to search your computer with EasyFind. You >>>>>>>>> therefore >>>>>>>>> cannot be sure there are no remnants residing on your relevant >>>>>>>>> machine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> it doesn't matter if there is or not. remnants are *inert*. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That isn't true. >>>>>> >>>>>> it absolutely is true. >>>>> >>>>> You are wrong - *AGAIN*! >>>> >>>> nope. >>>> >>>>>> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount >>>>>> of space. they can be ignored >>>>> MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free >>>>> trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. >>>> >>>> those aren't in any way harmful, and deleting them to get another free >>>> trial is theft. >>> >>> You claimed they were "inert" - they are not. You *LIED* - *AGAIN*! >>> >> >> They are inert. >> >> The software that looks for their presence is the actor. > > Thank you. I'm learning every day! :-) > > Now then - what looks for the presence of any OTHER files, those which > may *not* be inert? > > In other words, who/what checks the AV software once it has been > voluntarily installed? > > *Who checks the checker*? > Do you make this same complaint about all software... ...or just about one particular AV package by an author you are attempting to harass? That was a rhetorical question.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 12:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <q2iek0$e1t$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #127806 |
On 2019-01-26 7:50 a.m., David B. wrote: > On 26/01/2019 14:44, nospam *THE TROLL* says ... > >> In article <uh_2E.95189$Rl6.8259@fx10.fr7>, David B. < >> B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>>>> YOU have refused to search your computer with EasyFind. You therefore >>>>> cannot be sure there are no remnants residing on your relevant >>>>> machine. >>>> >>>> it doesn't matter if there is or not. remnants are *inert*. >>> >>> That isn't true. >> >> it absolutely is true. > > You are wrong - *AGAIN*! > >> ancillary files do nothing by themselves except take up a tiny amount >> of space. they can be ignored > MBAM leaves files which prevent one from having more than one free > trial. I've been led to believe that other software does so too. > Which are the very definition of inert. Those files (if they exist) do nothing. If you install a new trial, the software that you install does something.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 17:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gb3ihrFc4kdU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127796 |
On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 26/01/2019 14:25, nospam wrote: >> In article <w8N2E.18144$kn2.7333@fx24.fr7>, David B. < >> B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>> YOU have refused to search your computer with EasyFind. You therefore >>> cannot be sure there are no remnants residing on your relevant machine. >> >> it doesn't matter if there is or not. remnants are *inert*. > > That isn't true. It absolutely is true. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 21:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q2gfb8$2ue4$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
| In reply to | #127767 |
On 1/25/19 11:23 AM, David B. wrote: > Someone needs to suggest to Mark Allan that he should come here to > Usenet to support his position. I'd do that myself but he refuses to > correspond with me. Why? You seem to be the only one here obsessed with his product. No wonder he doesn't correspond with you. I personally don't expect any developer to come to this group to get abused by one person who doesn't trust their product. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | uk.comp.sys.mac
csiph-web