Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #127700 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-22 21:26 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 220 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to uk.comp.sys.mac
Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-22 21:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Ian McCall <ian@eruvia.org> - 2019-01-22 21:29 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-22 21:40 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Ray <amos.jones@outlook.com> - 2019-01-23 08:01 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 09:28 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 08:29 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Bob Campbell <none@none.none> - 2019-01-23 09:31 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 17:49 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 14:37 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 08:17 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 17:22 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 10:46 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 18:02 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 14:37 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 12:53 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 20:29 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2019-01-23 20:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 20:57 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 17:06 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 22:02 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 23:43 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 18:54 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 23:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-24 01:18 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-23 22:04 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-24 10:57 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-24 05:53 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 21:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 21:48 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-23 23:11 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 18:24 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-24 00:03 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Bob Campbell <none@none.none> - 2019-01-23 19:12 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-24 00:16 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-23 19:24 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Bob Campbell <none@none.none> - 2019-01-24 00:20 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-01-25 13:11 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-24 01:11 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 13:48 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 15:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 10:50 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-25 10:10 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 22:16 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-01-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-27 14:25 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 16:00 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 16:23 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 18:16 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 18:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 19:37 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-25 23:41 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:25 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 14:38 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:44 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 15:50 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:58 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 16:07 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:08 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 16:13 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:15 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 16:36 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:13 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 21:04 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 16:10 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 00:20 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 00:30 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 01:23 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:10 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-26 12:08 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-26 12:07 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 20:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 15:36 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-27 08:19 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-26 12:06 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:09 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> - 2019-01-25 21:06 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 08:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> - 2019-01-26 12:05 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-26 17:05 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 19:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 15:16 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> - 2019-01-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 20:48 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 16:10 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 00:17 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 00:24 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-27 01:22 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 18:13 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 19:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 12:30 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 12:39 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 13:11 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:25 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 14:40 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:44 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 15:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:38 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:38 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-26 08:53 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:58 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2019-01-26 09:32 -0700
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 11:39 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-26 15:54 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-26 10:58 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 15:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-27 22:44 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 09:30 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 11:41 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 17:15 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 09:22 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 18:43 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 10:55 -0800
OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 19:19 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 11:28 -0800
Re: OT? Not really! Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 20:00 -0200
TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 23:12 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 00:03 +0000
Re: TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 16:40 -0800
Re: TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-05 07:16 -0200
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 09:41 +0000
Re: TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-05 07:56 -0200
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 10:17 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 10:47 +0000
Re: TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-05 18:52 -0800
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 10:21 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 10:45 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-08 11:33 -0200
Re: [OT]TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-08 10:47 -0800
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-09 07:28 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-09 08:22 +0000
Re: TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-09 15:02 -0800
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-10 00:16 -0200
Re: [OT]TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-10 08:24 -0800
Re: [OT]TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 08:13 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:47 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 12:30 -0300
Re: [OT]TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 12:42 -0300
Re: [OT]TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 08:13 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 08:32 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 10:00 +0000
Re: TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 12:08 +0000
Re: [OT]TROLL post Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 12:00 -0300
Re: TROLL post Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:11 -0600
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-14 00:43 +0000
Re: TROLL post John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-13 19:58 -0800
Re: TROLL post Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2019-02-13 15:16 -0600
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:53 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: OT? Not really! - Rootkits and computers (was Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please.) John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 14:59 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 13:57 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 19:58 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 19:56 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 23:05 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:38 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-03 18:56 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 23:47 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 23:55 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 16:43 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 12:39 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-02-08 11:42 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-08 11:04 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 19:14 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Panthera Tigris Altaica <northentiger@outlook.com> - 2019-02-08 15:16 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@no.mail.afraid.org> - 2019-02-08 23:01 +0000
Re: [OT]Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-10 00:09 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 08:14 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 08:35 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-13 10:00 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 11:01 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 17:42 +0000
Re: [OT]Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-13 17:15 -0300
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-09 07:28 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:44 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-28 13:12 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 19:52 -0200
TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 23:25 +0000
Re: TROLL post Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-28 20:33 -0800
Re: TROLL post Wolffan <akwolffan@zoho.com> - 2019-01-28 23:54 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 00:31 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 16:42 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-04 19:45 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-02-05 07:51 -0200
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-05 09:54 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:50 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-03 18:56 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 00:05 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-03 19:07 -0500
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 00:56 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 09:07 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2019-02-04 14:48 -0800
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-02-03 23:52 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 13:36 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-01-27 15:10 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2019-01-28 09:39 -0200
TROLL post "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2019-01-28 11:50 +0000
Re: Scripts - help requested with this, please. Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Page 5 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 11 Next page →
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 08:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <MjV2E.39530$4r2.8183@fx25.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127780 |
On 26/01/2019 02:06, YK wrote: > On 1/25/19 11:23 AM, David B. wrote: >> Someone needs to suggest to Mark Allan that he should come here to >> Usenet to support his position. I'd do that myself but he refuses to >> correspond with me. > > Why? You seem to be the only one here obsessed with his product. No > wonder he doesn't correspond with you. I personally don't expect any > developer to come to this group to get abused by one person who doesn't > trust their product. Abused? Whatever do you mean? If the product is 'fine and dandy' then he should come here and say so. There would then be no doubt after hearing the truth from the horse's mouth, so to speak. 'Jolly Roger' is the only one who posts in these groups who has said that he uses it. I find that somewhat intriguing as I'm sure he's told me that anti-malware software is unnecessary on an Apple device or computer. Do YOU use ClamXAV? -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 12:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q2i40f$2840$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
| In reply to | #127781 |
On 1/26/19 3:59 AM, David B. wrote: > On 26/01/2019 02:06, YK wrote: >> On 1/25/19 11:23 AM, David B. wrote: >>> Someone needs to suggest to Mark Allan that he should come here to >>> Usenet to support his position. I'd do that myself but he refuses to >>> correspond with me. >> >> Why? You seem to be the only one here obsessed with his product. No >> wonder he doesn't correspond with you. I personally don't expect any >> developer to come to this group to get abused by one person who >> doesn't trust their product. > > Abused? Whatever do you mean? If the product is 'fine and dandy' then he > should come here and say so. There would then be no doubt after hearing > the truth from the horse's mouth, so to speak. > > 'Jolly Roger' is the only one who posts in these groups who has said > that he uses it. I find that somewhat intriguing as I'm sure he's told > me that anti-malware software is unnecessary on an Apple device or > computer. > > Do YOU use ClamXAV? Answered you once, No. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 17:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gb3ib3Fc4kdU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127781 |
On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 26/01/2019 02:06, YK wrote: >> On 1/25/19 11:23 AM, David B. wrote: >>> >>> Someone needs to suggest to Mark Allan that he should come here to >>> Usenet to support his position. I'd do that myself but he refuses to >>> correspond with me. >> >> Why? You seem to be the only one here obsessed with his product. No >> wonder he doesn't correspond with you. I personally don't expect any >> developer to come to this group to get abused by one person who >> doesn't trust their product. > > Abused? Whatever do you mean? Your constant insinuations that his software isn't trustworthy on multiple forums constitutes abuse - especially considering your claim is completely baseless. You're very obviously stalking him everywhere you can to do this. Grow up. > If the product is 'fine and dandy' then he should come here and say > so. He isn't obligated to change your mind. Everyone who knows anything at all already knows your shitty little claims that ClamXAV is somehow untrustworthy are invalid. > There would then be no doubt after hearing the truth from the horse's > mouth, so to speak. That's a lie. You are on a campaign to harass him by spreading Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt about ClamXAV, because you obviously have a stick up your ass. > 'Jolly Roger' is the only one who posts in these groups who has said > that he uses it. I find that somewhat intriguing as I'm sure he's told > me that anti-malware software is unnecessary on an Apple device or > computer. The fact that I have it installed doesn't mean I use it often at all, or that I allow it to scan my system constantly in the background. It sits in my Applications folder largely unused. I may have used it once to scan some file I was curious about, for instance, and then left it alone for years. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 19:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <FT23E.44426$0C.7463@fx02.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127822 |
On 26/01/2019 17:05, Jolly Roger wrote: > On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> On 26/01/2019 02:06, YK wrote: >>> On 1/25/19 11:23 AM, David B. wrote: >>>> >>>> Someone needs to suggest to Mark Allan that he should come here to >>>> Usenet to support his position. I'd do that myself but he refuses to >>>> correspond with me. >>> >>> Why? You seem to be the only one here obsessed with his product. No >>> wonder he doesn't correspond with you. I personally don't expect any >>> developer to come to this group to get abused by one person who >>> doesn't trust their product. >> >> Abused? Whatever do you mean? > > Your constant insinuations that his software isn't trustworthy on > multiple forums constitutes abuse - especially considering your claim is > completely baseless. You're very obviously stalking him everywhere you > can to do this. Grow up. I don't understand this 'stalking' accusation. There is a website which anyone can review. >> If the product is 'fine and dandy' then he should come here and say >> so. > > He isn't obligated to change your mind. Everyone who knows anything at > all already knows your shitty little claims that ClamXAV is somehow > untrustworthy are invalid. What I want to know is if it *IS* trustworthy. *YOU* say AV software isn't required on an Apple computer yet now claim you have it installed on your Mac (or ONE of yours. I have no idea why you have MANY and you have never explained) >> There would then be no doubt after hearing the truth from the horse's >> mouth, so to speak. > > That's a lie. You are on a campaign to harass him by spreading Fear, > Uncertainty, and Doubt about ClamXAV, because you obviously have a stick > up your ass. Me, harass HIM? He's a computer guru. I'm just a regular user asking questions which are never answered. >> 'Jolly Roger' is the only one who posts in these groups who has said >> that he uses it. I find that somewhat intriguing as I'm sure he's told >> me that anti-malware software is unnecessary on an Apple device or >> computer. > > The fact that I have it installed doesn't mean I use it often at all, or > that I allow it to scan my system constantly in the background. It sits > in my Applications folder largely unused. I may have used it once to > scan some file I was curious about, for instance, and then left it alone > for years. It sounds very much as if you aren't using the current version. What version DO you have in your Applications folder? -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 15:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260120191516406943%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #127826 |
In article <FT23E.44426$0C.7463@fx02.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>>> Someone needs to suggest to Mark Allan that he should come here to > >>>> Usenet to support his position. I'd do that myself but he refuses to > >>>> correspond with me. > >>> > >>> Why? You seem to be the only one here obsessed with his product. No > >>> wonder he doesn't correspond with you. I personally don't expect any > >>> developer to come to this group to get abused by one person who > >>> doesn't trust their product. > >> > >> Abused? Whatever do you mean? > > > > Your constant insinuations that his software isn't trustworthy on > > multiple forums constitutes abuse - especially considering your claim is > > completely baseless. You're very obviously stalking him everywhere you > > can to do this. Grow up. > > I don't understand this 'stalking' accusation. of course you don't. you don't understand much of anything. > There is a website which > anyone can review. you've done a lot more than 'review' his website. > >> If the product is 'fine and dandy' then he should come here and say > >> so. > > > > He isn't obligated to change your mind. Everyone who knows anything at > > all already knows your shitty little claims that ClamXAV is somehow > > untrustworthy are invalid. > > What I want to know is if it *IS* trustworthy. you've been told the answer to that countless times. if you don't think it's trustworthy, then don't use it. simple. > *YOU* say AV software > isn't required on an Apple computer yet now claim you have it installed > on your Mac (or ONE of yours. I have no idea why you have MANY and you > have never explained) many people have more than one computer and it's none of your fucking business why they do or how many they have. > >> There would then be no doubt after hearing the truth from the horse's > >> mouth, so to speak. > > > > That's a lie. You are on a campaign to harass him by spreading Fear, > > Uncertainty, and Doubt about ClamXAV, because you obviously have a stick > > up your ass. > > Me, harass HIM? He's a computer guru. I'm just a regular user asking > questions which are never answered. you are in no way a 'regular user' and your (ignorant) questions have been answered, often more than once. repeatedly asking the same questions over and over serves no purpose other than to annoy people, at which point they choose to not answer you anymore and instead tell you to fuck off. > >> 'Jolly Roger' is the only one who posts in these groups who has said > >> that he uses it. I find that somewhat intriguing as I'm sure he's told > >> me that anti-malware software is unnecessary on an Apple device or > >> computer. > > > > The fact that I have it installed doesn't mean I use it often at all, or > > that I allow it to scan my system constantly in the background. It sits > > in my Applications folder largely unused. I may have used it once to > > scan some file I was curious about, for instance, and then left it alone > > for years. > > It sounds very much as if you aren't using the current version. What > version DO you have in your Applications folder? it's none of your fucking business what people have in their applications folder or what versions they might be.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | YK <xxxxx@dialme.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 15:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q2ifc3$eg5$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
| In reply to | #127826 |
On 1/26/19 2:52 PM, David B. wrote: > On 26/01/2019 17:05, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> On 26/01/2019 02:06, YK wrote: >>>> On 1/25/19 11:23 AM, David B. wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Someone needs to suggest to Mark Allan that he should come here to >>>>> Usenet to support his position. I'd do that myself but he refuses to >>>>> correspond with me. >>>> >>>> Why? You seem to be the only one here obsessed with his product. No >>>> wonder he doesn't correspond with you. I personally don't expect any >>>> developer to come to this group to get abused by one person who >>>> doesn't trust their product. >>> >>> Abused? Whatever do you mean? >> >> Your constant insinuations that his software isn't trustworthy on >> multiple forums constitutes abuse - especially considering your claim is >> completely baseless. You're very obviously stalking him everywhere you >> can to do this. Grow up. > > I don't understand this 'stalking' accusation. There is a website which > anyone can review. It's really more of an obsession, from what I have observed. >>> If the product is 'fine and dandy' then he should come here and say >>> so. >> >> He isn't obligated to change your mind. Everyone who knows anything at >> all already knows your shitty little claims that ClamXAV is somehow >> untrustworthy are invalid. > > What I want to know is if it *IS* trustworthy. *YOU* say AV software > isn't required on an Apple computer yet now claim you have it installed > on your Mac (or ONE of yours. I have no idea why you have MANY and you > have never explained) > >>> There would then be no doubt after hearing the truth from the horse's >>> mouth, so to speak. >> >> That's a lie. You are on a campaign to harass him by spreading Fear, >> Uncertainty, and Doubt about ClamXAV, because you obviously have a stick >> up your ass. > > Me, harass HIM? He's a computer guru. I'm just a regular user asking > questions which are never answered. Sure. Being a computer guru means you can question them anytime or in any manner. Besides, who said he is a "computer guru"? Is that your impression because he is a software developer? >>> 'Jolly Roger' is the only one who posts in these groups who has said >>> that he uses it. I find that somewhat intriguing as I'm sure he's told >>> me that anti-malware software is unnecessary on an Apple device or >>> computer. >> >> The fact that I have it installed doesn't mean I use it often at all, or >> that I allow it to scan my system constantly in the background. It sits >> in my Applications folder largely unused. I may have used it once to >> scan some file I was curious about, for instance, and then left it alone >> for years. > > It sounds very much as if you aren't using the current version. What > version DO you have in your Applications folder? > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 20:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <UI33E.18090$oQ1.9165@fx03.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127832 |
On 26/01/2019 20:19, YK wrote: > On 1/26/19 2:52 PM, David B. wrote: >> On 26/01/2019 17:05, Jolly Roger wrote: >>> On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>> On 26/01/2019 02:06, YK wrote: >>>>> On 1/25/19 11:23 AM, David B. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Someone needs to suggest to Mark Allan that he should come here to >>>>>> Usenet to support his position. I'd do that myself but he refuses to >>>>>> correspond with me. >>>>> >>>>> Why? You seem to be the only one here obsessed with his product. No >>>>> wonder he doesn't correspond with you. I personally don't expect any >>>>> developer to come to this group to get abused by one person who >>>>> doesn't trust their product. >>>> >>>> Abused? Whatever do you mean? >>> >>> Your constant insinuations that his software isn't trustworthy on >>> multiple forums constitutes abuse - especially considering your claim is >>> completely baseless. You're very obviously stalking him everywhere you >>> can to do this. Grow up. >> >> I don't understand this 'stalking' accusation. There is a website >> which anyone can review. > > It's really more of an obsession, from what I have observed. It's good to know that you are following along. :-) >>>> If the product is 'fine and dandy' then he should come here and say >>>> so. >>> >>> He isn't obligated to change your mind. Everyone who knows anything at >>> all already knows your shitty little claims that ClamXAV is somehow >>> untrustworthy are invalid. >> >> What I want to know is if it *IS* trustworthy. *YOU* say AV software >> isn't required on an Apple computer yet now claim you have it >> installed on your Mac (or ONE of yours. I have no idea why you have >> MANY and you have never explained) >> >>>> There would then be no doubt after hearing the truth from the horse's >>>> mouth, so to speak. >>> >>> That's a lie. You are on a campaign to harass him by spreading Fear, >>> Uncertainty, and Doubt about ClamXAV, because you obviously have a stick >>> up your ass. >> >> Me, harass HIM? He's a computer guru. I'm just a regular user asking >> questions which are never answered. > > Sure. Being a computer guru means you can question them anytime or in > any manner. Besides, who said he is a "computer guru"? Is that your > impression because he is a software developer? Mark Allan has a degree in Computer Science from the University of St, Andrews - at least, that's what it says in his LinkedIn profile. https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-allan-5164b16a/ To me, that makes him a guru! Mind you, NOBODY has given him a 'Recommendation' on his profile. >>>> 'Jolly Roger' is the only one who posts in these groups who has said >>>> that he uses it. I find that somewhat intriguing as I'm sure he's told >>>> me that anti-malware software is unnecessary on an Apple device or >>>> computer. >>> >>> The fact that I have it installed doesn't mean I use it often at all, or >>> that I allow it to scan my system constantly in the background. It sits >>> in my Applications folder largely unused. I may have used it once to >>> scan some file I was curious about, for instance, and then left it alone >>> for years. >> >> It sounds very much as if you aren't using the current version. What >> version DO you have in your Applications folder? HTH -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 16:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260120191610562278%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #127835 |
In article <UI33E.18090$oQ1.9165@fx03.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >>> That's a lie. You are on a campaign to harass him by spreading Fear, > >>> Uncertainty, and Doubt about ClamXAV, because you obviously have a stick > >>> up your ass. > >> > >> Me, harass HIM? He's a computer guru. I'm just a regular user asking > >> questions which are never answered. > > > > Sure. Being a computer guru means you can question them anytime or in > > any manner. Besides, who said he is a "computer guru"? Is that your > > impression because he is a software developer? > > Mark Allan has a degree in Computer Science from the University of St, > Andrews - at least, that's what it says in his LinkedIn profile. and the stalking continues... > To me, that makes him a guru! compared to you, anyone with a double-digit iq is a guru. millions of people have computer science degrees, many of whom have no idea what they're doing. it's actually rather shocking. i've seen many people fail to answer basic questions in interviews. very few people are gurus, some of whom don't even need to get a degree because they know more than the faculty does.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 00:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gb4bktFh6skU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127826 |
On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 26/01/2019 17:05, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> On 26/01/2019 02:06, YK wrote: >>>> On 1/25/19 11:23 AM, David B. wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Someone needs to suggest to Mark Allan that he should come here to >>>>> Usenet to support his position. I'd do that myself but he refuses >>>>> to correspond with me. >>>> >>>> Why? You seem to be the only one here obsessed with his product. No >>>> wonder he doesn't correspond with you. I personally don't expect >>>> any developer to come to this group to get abused by one person who >>>> doesn't trust their product. >>> >>> Abused? Whatever do you mean? >> >> Your constant insinuations that his software isn't trustworthy on >> multiple forums constitutes abuse - especially considering your claim >> is completely baseless. You're very obviously stalking him everywhere >> you can to do this. Grow up. > > I don't understand this 'stalking' accusation. Yes you do. You just refuse to acknowledge your personal problem. But you don't need to acknowledge it for the rest of us to see it clearly. >>> If the product is 'fine and dandy' then he should come here and say >>> so. >> >> He isn't obligated to change your mind. Everyone who knows anything >> at all already knows your shitty little claims that ClamXAV is >> somehow untrustworthy are invalid. > > What I want to know is if it *IS* trustworthy. You've already been told by me and others who know *way* more than you about these things that it *is* trustworthy. You continue to insist otherwise because you have a stick up your ass and hold a grudge against the author of ClamXAV like the huge man-child you are. > *YOU* say AV software isn't required on an Apple computer yet now > claim you have it installed on your Mac That doesn't point to it being untrustworthy either. Logic fail. You lose. > (or ONE of yours. I have no idea why you have MANY and you have never > explained) I don't owe you an explanation as to why I have many computers. The fact that I work in the tech industry professionally should give you a hint though - assuming you have a couple brain cells to rub together. >>> There would then be no doubt after hearing the truth from the >>> horse's mouth, so to speak. >> >> That's a lie. You are on a campaign to harass him by spreading Fear, >> Uncertainty, and Doubt about ClamXAV, because you obviously have a >> stick up your ass. > > Me, harass HIM? Yes. That's what you are doing by insisting that his software is untrustworthy, which is untrue, even as others who know way more than you tell you it's trustworthy. > He's a computer guru. I'm just a regular user asking questions which > are never answered. Liar. See above. >>> 'Jolly Roger' is the only one who posts in these groups who has said >>> that he uses it. I find that somewhat intriguing as I'm sure he's >>> told me that anti-malware software is unnecessary on an Apple device >>> or computer. >> >> The fact that I have it installed doesn't mean I use it often at all, >> or that I allow it to scan my system constantly in the background. It >> sits in my Applications folder largely unused. I may have used it >> once to scan some file I was curious about, for instance, and then >> left it alone for years. > > It sounds very much as if you aren't using the current version. What > version DO you have in your Applications folder? Irrelevant. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 00:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qT63E.95193$Rl6.14292@fx10.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127846 |
On 27/01/2019 00:17, Jolly Roger wrote: > On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: [....] >> It sounds very much as if you aren't using the current version. What >> version DO you have in your Applications folder? > > Irrelevant. No, it's *absolutely* relevant! If you didn't PAY for your version we're not singing from the same hymn sheet. That would, of course, mean that you haven't 'tested' the current version at all - ever! -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 01:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gb4ffdFh6skU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127848 |
On 2019-01-27, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > On 27/01/2019 00:17, Jolly Roger wrote: >> On 2019-01-26, David B. <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > [....] >>> It sounds very much as if you aren't using the current version. What >>> version DO you have in your Applications folder? >> >> Irrelevant. > > No, it's *absolutely* relevant! Nope. It isn't relevant. Continue your childish campaign on your own if you feel you must, man-child. I'm out. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 18:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36b5622a801afdfe9897e5@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127766 |
In article <gb0q4gFob89U1@mid.individual.net>, jollyroger@pobox.com says... > > jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > At the risk of fanning the flames... > > > > I installed ClamXAV back in November I think on my macbook on which I am > > running Mojave and parallels 14 (and within which I run Win10) > > > > I have been having serious issues with my Win10 - slow program loading > > times, lacklustre performance, really slow to "sort itself out" after > > opening the lid when on battery power (I always simply shut the lid - no > > hibernate or other options used). > > But you didn?t attempt to figure out why? The proper thing to do is take > diagnostic steps such as looking at what the system is doing at the time of > the problem, such as which processes are consuming the most CPU, RAM, and > storage activity. Since you haven?t mentioned any details it sounds like > you were completely unaware of the cause of your problem, which could have > been many things unrelated to ClamXAV. > I understand all that but, frankly, I was just relieved that removing a piece of software for which I didn't really have a need resulted in the symptoms I described disappearing - I am not in a position to state that ClamXAV was responsible (and my motivation for removing it wasn't because I had any suspicions that it was impacting performance - i could see nothing on Activity Monitor for example indicating it was eating all the CPU for example) - just that, after its removal, my system was back to its happy self. > > I couln't find out how to prevent it from > > running automatically on bootup of Mojave and couldn't find out how to > > deinstal it either. > > Both are easy to do, and the steps to do so are readily available with > simple web searches. > Yeah I did those things - one of the first things it said was (paraphrasing) quit ClamXAV - but the options to kill it didn't exist (I clicked on its icon and it offered me options such as "update virus definitions" (not sure exactly what it said) but nothing to ay quit. When I used activity monitor to try and kill the process - i.e. double click, up pops a window with one of the options being "force quit" - I would select this, it would kill the process and (I kid you not) the bloody thing would just start running again - I assume this is some kind of property associated with something "higher" in the hierarchy - perhaps I was killing a child process and its owner simply spawned a new one - hence why I gogled for other ways to remove an app. > > You can simply drag ClamXAV.app to the trash; after a few seconds you?ll > see a message asking if you would also like to uninstall the scanning > engine. If this doesn?t happen or it doesn?t appear to have worked, you can > download the uninstaller and run it manually. The uninstaller will remove > the scanning engine, preferences and any schedules you?ve got set up. But > we?ll be sorry to see you go.? > Oh just remembered - looking at the list of Applications within Finder - alphabetically arranged - I couldn't see it listed - so perhaps it was impropery installed in the first place. > > I ran a trial version of App Cleaner on Monday - it removed ClamXAV > > successfully. > > App cleaners are not needed on macOS, and often cause more problems than I hope not in my case :) -- jeremy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 19:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gb17nrFqtoeU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127773 |
On 2019-01-25, jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <gb0q4gFob89U1@mid.individual.net>, jollyroger@pobox.com > says... >> >> But you didn?t attempt to figure out why? The proper thing to do is >> take diagnostic steps such as looking at what the system is doing at >> the time of the problem, such as which processes are consuming the >> most CPU, RAM, and storage activity. Since you haven?t mentioned any >> details it sounds like you were completely unaware of the cause of >> your problem, which could have been many things unrelated to ClamXAV. > > I understand all that but, frankly, I was just relieved that removing > a piece of software for which I didn't really have a need resulted in > the symptoms I described disappearing - I am not in a position to > state that ClamXAV was responsible For some reason, I got the impression that's exactly what you were implying. > (and my motivation for removing it wasn't because I had any suspicions > that it was impacting performance - i could see nothing on Activity > Monitor for example indicating it was eating all the CPU for example) > - just that, after its removal, my system was back to its happy self. It's very likely other things were removed by the app cleaner as well. I point that out to say that you can't legitimately claim ClamXAV was the cause. >> > I couln't find out how to prevent it from running automatically on >> > bootup of Mojave and couldn't find out how to deinstal it either. >> >> Both are easy to do, and the steps to do so are readily available >> with simple web searches. > > Yeah I did those things - one of the first things it said was > (paraphrasing) quit ClamXAV - but the options to kill it didn't exist > (I clicked on its icon and it offered me options such as "update virus > definitions" (not sure exactly what it said) but nothing to ay quit.i Huh? All macOS apps have a "Quit" menu command in the app menu. It's right there: <https://i.imgur.com/SG0Dp9s.png> > When I used activity monitor to try and kill the process - i.e. double > click, up pops a window with one of the options being "force quit" - I > would select this, it would kill the process and (I kid you not) the > bloody thing would just start running again - I assume this is some > kind of property associated with something "higher" in the hierarchy - > perhaps I was killing a child process and its owner simply spawned a > new one - hence why I gogled for other ways to remove an app. Background services often have ways of re-launching if they are killed (or crash) unexpectedly. You force quit it rather than disabling Sentry in ClamXAV's preferences, which is what you should have done. It detected that the process ended unexpectedly and re-launched it. It should be noted that the fact that you tried to kill its processes "behind its back" by force quitting them rather than quitting them normally could very well have caused ClamXAV itself to malfunction, which in turn could have caused related performance issues. >> You can simply drag ClamXAV.app to the trash; after a few seconds >> you?ll see a message asking if you would also like to uninstall the >> scanning engine. If this doesn?t happen or it doesn?t appear to have >> worked, you can download the uninstaller and run it manually. The >> uninstaller will remove the scanning engine, preferences and any >> schedules you?ve got set up. But we?ll be sorry to see you go.? >> > Oh just remembered - looking at the list of Applications within Finder > - alphabetically arranged - I couldn't see it listed - so perhaps it > was impropery installed in the first place. Normally, ClamXAV is in the /Applications folder. It's possible you ran it from some other location. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 12:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36b6634f8af7fe619897e7@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127778 |
In article <gb17nrFqtoeU2@mid.individual.net>, jollyroger@pobox.com says... > > I understand all that but, frankly, I was just relieved that removing > > a piece of software for which I didn't really have a need resulted in > > the symptoms I described disappearing - I am not in a position to > > state that ClamXAV was responsible > > For some reason, I got the impression that's exactly what you were > implying. > Well - the action I took was removing ClamXAV - and afterwards my system was quick & stable again. I had no evidence before that made me suspect ClamXAV; it was just a happy outcome. Maybe the install was bad in some ways (hence why I was unable to stop it from running / deinstal according to the instructions I found on the 'net). > It's very likely other things were removed by the app cleaner as well. > I point that out to say that you can't legitimately claim ClamXAV > was the cause. > Could well be - I have no way of knowing though. > <https://i.imgur.com/SG0Dp9s.png> I didn't have that option - that's the first thing I looked for. I also didn't have options to disable Sentry - it surprised me I have to say. I am tempted to resinstall it and see if I am (a) being fair and (b) misremembering. -- jeremy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jeremy <jeremy0505@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 12:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36b6655a988c78509897e8@news.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #127787 |
In article <MPG.36b6634f8af7fe619897e7@news.individual.net>, jeremy0505 @gmail.com says... > I am tempted to resinstall it and see if I am (a) being fair and > (b) misremembering. > > Temptation got the better of me Re-downloaded (v3.0.9), ran the installer As I was on a trial before, it wouldn't allow me to execute now as the trial period expired. It was visible in Finder under Applications - when I sent it to Trash I was prompted if I wanted to uninstall - I OK'd that and then received message that it had been successfully removed. Whatever mess it was in before was, I guess, of my own doing. Just not sure how. -- jeremy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 13:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d0Z2E.63350$7S2.11025@fx08.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127788 |
On 26/01/2019 12:39, jeremy wrote: > In article <MPG.36b6634f8af7fe619897e7@news.individual.net>, jeremy0505 > @gmail.com says... >> I am tempted to resinstall it and see if I am (a) being fair and >> (b) misremembering. >> >> > > Temptation got the better of me > > Re-downloaded (v3.0.9), ran the installer > > As I was on a trial before, it wouldn't allow me to execute now as the > trial period expired. > > It was visible in Finder under Applications - when I sent it to Trash I > was prompted if I wanted to uninstall - I OK'd that and then received > message that it had been successfully removed. > > Whatever mess it was in before was, I guess, of my own doing. Just not > sure how. You're a man after my own heart, 'jeremy'! :-) Now, the next step! From the App Store, install EasyFind Then search the whole of your computer for, say, "Clam" and see what you find. I'll be most interested to hear what you find (or don't find!) It might take a while if you have a large hard drive. -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 09:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260120190925302726%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #127789 |
In article <d0Z2E.63350$7S2.11025@fx08.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > Now, the next step! From the App Store, install EasyFind do not do this > Then search the whole of your computer for, say, "Clam" and see what you > find. I'll be most interested to hear what you find (or don't find!) it's none of your fucking business what's on his hard drive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 14:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <yj_2E.95190$Rl6.76534@fx10.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127793 |
On 26/01/2019 14:25, nospam wrote: > In article <d0Z2E.63350$7S2.11025@fx08.fr7>, David B. < > B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> Now, the next step! From the App Store, install EasyFind > > do not do this I've already done it! :-) >> Then search the whole of your computer for, say, "Clam" and see what you >> find. I'll be most interested to hear what you find (or don't find!) > > it's none of your fucking business what's on his hard drive. What are YOU bothered about? Frightened he might uncover the truth? -- David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 09:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <260120190944371546%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #127797 |
In article <yj_2E.95190$Rl6.76534@fx10.fr7>, David B. < B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> Now, the next step! From the App Store, install EasyFind > > > > do not do this > > I've already done it! :-) nobody cares what you do to your own computer. telling others to do worthless stuff is not acceptable. > >> Then search the whole of your computer for, say, "Clam" and see what you > >> find. I'll be most interested to hear what you find (or don't find!) > > > > it's none of your fucking business what's on his hard drive. > > What are YOU bothered about? Frightened he might uncover the truth? the only truth is that you're an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David B." <"David B"@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 15:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <R4%2E.63351$7S2.16606@fx08.fr7> |
| In reply to | #127798 |
On 26/01/2019 14:44, nospam *THE TROLL* said ...
> In article <yj_2E.95190$Rl6.76534@fx10.fr7>, David B. <
> B"@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
>>>> Now, the next step! From the App Store, install EasyFind
>>>
>>> do not do this
>>
>> I've already done it! :-)
>
> nobody cares what you do to your own computer.
I most certainly hope not!
> telling others to do worthless stuff is not acceptable.
WTF? This is Usenet. :-)
>>>> Then search the whole of your computer for, say, "Clam" and see what you
>>>> find. I'll be most interested to hear what you find (or don't find!)
>>>
>>> it's none of your fucking business what's on his hard drive.
>>
>> What are YOU bothered about? Frightened he might uncover the truth?
>
> the only truth is that you're an idiot.
*YOU* are not competent to judge!
*Truth*! ........
X-Received: by 10.152.88.70 with SMTP id be6mr5315849lab.1.1413905206061;
Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Path:
xd10ni94992lbb.1!nntp.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feed.xsnews.nl!fbe002.ams.xsnews.nl!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:26:45 -0500
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:26:44 +0100
From: ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.politics.scorched-earth,microsoft.public.test.here,alt.2600
Subject: Re: Was: Scan result - BD's 'puter is fuxed up!!
References: <m1m6nt$718$1@dont-email.me> <m1m88g$cj3$1@dont-email.me>
<FYudncVQboQANqPJnZ2dnUVZ8jKdnZ2d@bt.com>
<i4m44a9hqp2ian5pc36cal4vrd1tl25u39@Osama-is-dead.net>
<RKWdnYf844pd79_JnZ2dnUVZ8vSdnZ2d@bt.com>
<XnsA3CBE3A71E15BC9X238BHEUFHHI5RJ791@192.254.233.145>
<6Zidnakd59gzjNjJnZ2dnUVZ8hidnZ2d@bt.com>
<XnsA3CC7836CDAF5C9X238BHEUFHHI5RJ791@192.254.233.145>
<JJqdnZTukplXB9jJnZ2dnUVZ8gmdnZ2d@bt.com>
<XnsA3CCDEFE2C8F4C9X238BHEUFHHI5RJ791@192.254.233.145>
<ka6dncUwMJySjtvJnZ2dnUVZ8uKdnZ2d@bt.com>
<m25eke$cdb$1@news2.open-news-network.org>
<tPidndHlbLfb89vJnZ2dnUVZ8qydnZ2d@bt.com>
<m25r5k$l58$1@news2.open-news-network.org>
In-Reply-To: <m25r5k$l58$1@news2.open-news-network.org>
Message-ID: <oMKdnWQ5ltqo5tvJnZ2dnUVZ8hWdnZ2d@bt.com>
Lines: 75
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser
X-Trace:
sv3-beKgID3pzatIV83CfgFa80jFKXKBX6abzunxpFdTI3TsQ3UBASNO5nf6bBbG0osuLU4vwi94P2IaOO/!B3jSBT2UmNDD+E3KIywdaK8AEYT/L+dW9T/mD+yZHrMxUXZbz4gzalbLe2p3/UT+YUGmmTRvNQk=
X-Complaints-To: ab...@btinternet.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ab...@btinternet.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 4518
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 21/10/2014 15:38, FromTheRafters wrote:
> ~BD~ explained on 10/21/2014 :
>> On 21/10/2014 12:04, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> ~BD~ explained :
>>>> NewsReader : Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0)
>>>> Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
>>>> Author : ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org>
>>>> Newsgroups :
>>>> alt.politics.scorched-earth,microsoft.public.test.here,alt.2600
>>>>
>>>> On 21/10/2014 02:53, Dustin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the 'SwissArmyKnife' file
>>>>
>>>>> If you hadn't of been such a prick towards me, I'd just tell you what
>>>>> it is and what it does and why Malwarebytes uses it. You chose to
>>>>> make me an enemy though.. So...
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds to me, like you have a few options.
>>>>>
>>>>> (1) Use one of your other accounts to post on the forum. You've
>>>>> previously admitted to having atleast one additional one that isn't
>>>>> banned. Making your excuse in both cases, lame. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> (2) Create a new account (It's criminal computer trespass, but laws,
>>>>> pesky little things haven't stopped you before. You've already
>>>>> demonstrated that you believe the laws are written for everyone else,
>>>>> but you)
>>>>>
>>>>> (3) try to con somebody else with the required knowledge and
>>>>> skillsets to tell you what the file is and what it's doing. :)
>>>>
>>>> I have found this!
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I found this, and it is much shorter.
>>>
>>> http://www.tldp.org/LDP/lpg/node6.html
>>>
>>> ...of course, neither is relevant to this discussion.
>>
>> Your right! :-)
>
> That should be "your left, your left, your left-right-left..."
Duh! :-( You're right again!!! ;-)
It's probably Dustin's influence over the years! Regardless, I apologise
for my mistake.
>> Do YOU use the Malwarebytes product, FTR?
>
> Not the active scanner, but I do sometimes use the malware removal free
> version. Well, I've used it twice to remove a self-inflicted FBI
> ransomware thing. Both times I got a free trial of the active part and
> didn't really use it.
Have you uninstalled MBAM? Then checked to see what's left behind?
"This tool was created to completely remove all traces of the program
from your computer."
https://helpdesk.malwarebytes.org/hc/en-us/articles/201861636-How-do-I-uninstall-Malwarebytes-Anti-Malware-
I used the 'removal' tool - and a straightforward 'search' for 'mbam'
afterwards *still found a number of files*. Try it and see!
>> I'd appreciate you telling me why you do - or you don't - use it as
>> the case may be.
>
> It is unnecessary as are many other 'solutions'.
OK - I seem to manage quite well without it too!
==
The files left behind were later discovered to be to there specifically
to prevent a user from having more than one 'free trial'.
The statement made in respect of the MBAM removal tool was a lie.
From what 'jeremy' has said, ClamXAV *MUST* do something similar.
--
David B.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | uk.comp.sys.mac
csiph-web