Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > talk.politics.misc > #1178422 > unrolled thread
| Started by | bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-03-25 07:35 -0400 |
| Last post | 2025-03-28 22:15 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 90 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to talk.politics.misc
Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-03-25 07:35 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-03-25 11:49 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-03-25 13:05 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-03-25 15:35 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-26 07:32 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-03-26 11:38 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-03-26 12:48 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-03-26 14:04 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.org> - 2025-03-26 11:16 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-26 15:30 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 20:31 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-27 07:08 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 20:31 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> - 2025-03-26 08:50 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-26 10:14 -0600
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-26 18:20 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Chris Voigtlander <jacque.idiot.pal@number.2> - 2025-03-26 08:52 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-26 10:14 -0600
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-26 22:45 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-27 07:11 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 20:34 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-03-26 22:53 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-27 07:12 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2025-03-27 09:01 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-27 15:05 -0600
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-28 07:07 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.org> - 2025-03-26 16:03 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-26 10:15 -0600
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-03-26 17:38 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2025-03-26 10:54 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-26 18:20 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-27 07:13 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-03-27 13:10 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-03-27 13:41 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-27 08:55 -0600
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-27 10:52 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-28 07:01 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-28 13:02 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-29 08:40 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Lee <cleetios@gmail.corn> - 2025-03-28 08:13 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-29 08:41 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-29 16:48 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-30 09:32 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-30 14:35 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-30 09:33 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-04-01 19:42 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-04-02 07:37 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-04-02 12:38 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-04-02 19:48 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-03 02:41 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-09 00:01 -0600
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-09 13:01 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-04-25 12:41 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-04-26 08:58 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-26 09:26 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-01 23:19 -0600
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-04-27 09:06 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-05-01 16:44 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-05-02 11:01 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 15:54 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-05-05 11:55 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-05-05 22:12 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-03 02:39 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-04-03 07:17 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-03 02:31 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-29 08:41 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-03-27 13:35 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 20:37 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2025-03-27 09:05 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Skeeter <none@none.com> - 2025-03-27 15:06 -0600
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 20:35 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-26 16:25 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-26 22:52 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-26 18:20 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-27 08:39 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-27 13:00 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) - 2025-03-27 14:38 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-28 07:04 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-03-28 13:05 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-03-28 11:25 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-03-29 01:45 +0000
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2025-03-28 08:34 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-26 15:29 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> - 2025-03-26 07:21 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-03-26 07:36 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-26 18:20 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 20:45 -0400
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-26 18:20 -0700
Re: Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.org> - 2025-03-26 15:24 +0000
Re: I kneel before his majesty, Donald Trump Our Donkey <orange-dog@1.2> - 2025-03-28 22:15 +0100
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-25 07:35 -0400 |
| Subject | Signalgate, A Massive Trump National Security Failure |
| Message-ID | <vru4dr$cv1$1@panix3.panix.com> |
|
| THE LAST WALTZ? Questions are swirling this morning about
| the future of national security adviser Mike Waltz over his
| role in what is surely -- hands-down -- one of the dumbest
| security breaches of recent times. Waltz has yet to comment
| publicly on The Atlantic's jaw-dropping revelation that he
| set up an unsecured Signal chat group to discuss military
| battle plans with Cabinet colleagues -- and then
| accidentally invited Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey
| Goldberg to join. POLITICO's Dasha Burns, Rachael Bade and
| Eli Stokols revealed last night that multiple conversations
| are now underway among White House officials over whether
| Waltz should be forced to resign. All eyes are on the
| commander-in-chief for a final decision.
|
| What's on Trump's mind? Ominously for Waltz, there has been
| no message of support thus far from the president, who
| instead spent last night posting videos on Truth Social
| about his own achievements. In fact, Trump -- normally a
| vocal armchair pundit -- has not commented at all on the
| story, beyond a few initial boilerplate attacks on The
| Atlantic. All the signs are he's mulling his options.
|
| Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the
| Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than
| just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful,
| it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most
| dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank
| incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group
| chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the
| group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the
| country?) Yeah, it's a bad one.
| ...
<https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2025/03/25/signalgate-00246894>
--bks
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-25 11:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vru58u$j1j$2@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #1178422 |
> | Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the
> | Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than
> | just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful,
> | it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most
> | dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank
> | incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group
> | chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the
> | group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the
> | country?) Yeah, it's a bad one.
|
| Senior officials in President Donald Trump's administration
| are facing fallout from revelations that they used a
| commercial messaging app to discuss secret military plans
| for Yemen and inadvertently included a journalist in the
| group chat. The subject is certain to come up Tuesday at a
| previously scheduled Senate Intelligence Committee hearing
| at which at least two of the Cabinet members who
| participated in the chat -- Director of National
| Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe
| -- are slated to testify.
| ...
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/03/25/trump-presidency-news/>
--bks
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-25 13:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsB2AD52E1A3B81629555@185.151.15.190> |
| In reply to | #1178426 |
bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote in news:vru58u$j1j$2@reader1.panix.com: >> | Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the >> | Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than >> | just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful, >> | it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most >> | dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank >> | incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group >> | chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the >> | group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the >> | country?) Yeah, it's a bad one. > > | > | Senior officials in President Donald Trump's administration > | are facing fallout from revelations that they used a > | commercial messaging app to discuss secret military plans > | for Yemen and inadvertently included a journalist in the > | group chat. The subject is certain to come up Tuesday at a > | previously scheduled Senate Intelligence Committee hearing > | at which at least two of the Cabinet members who > | participated in the chat -- Director of National > | Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe > | -- are slated to testify. > | ... > <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/03/25/trump-presidency-ne > ws/> > > --bks > Speaking of security breaches, remember the top secret Russian binder that "went missing" when Trump left office. A Christmas present for Putin, no doubt. Binder of classified material on Russia reportedly went missing in final Trump days Dec 15 2023 https://tinyurl.com/2s39sxa4 Binder With Top-Secret Russia Intelligence Missing Since End of Trump Term Dec. 15, 2023 https://tinyurl.com/28px33jk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-25 15:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vruigf$t7a$2@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #1178431 |
>>> | Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the
>>> | Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than
>>> | just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful,
>>> | it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most
>>> | dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank
>>> | incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group
>>> | chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the
>>> | group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the
>>> | country?) Yeah, it's a bad one.
|
| My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get.
| These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots,
| but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots.
| ...
<https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/the-worst-and-the-dimmest>
|
| Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate
| Intelligence Committee, criticized the Trump administration
| for using a Signal group to discuss plans for carrying out
| bombing in Yemen, calling on officials to resign and saying
| others would have been fired for the same actions.
| ...
| "If this was the case of a military officer or an
| intelligence officer and they had this kind of behavior,
| they would be fired," he added.
|
| "This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless,
| incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified
| information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time
| error."
| ...
<https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5212589-warner-hegseth-waltz-intel-group-chat/>
--bks
They're DUI hires.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 07:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5cp7ujhto9s8gq3qbcf4nt0ufcamnkel6q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1178449 |
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:35:43 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote: >>>> | Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the >>>> | Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than >>>> | just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful, >>>> | it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most >>>> | dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank >>>> | incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group >>>> | chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the >>>> | group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the >>>> | country?) Yeah, it's a bad one. > > | > | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. > | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, > | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. > | ... ><https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/the-worst-and-the-dimmest> > > | > | Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate > | Intelligence Committee, criticized the Trump administration > | for using a Signal group to discuss plans for carrying out > | bombing in Yemen, calling on officials to resign and saying > | others would have been fired for the same actions. > | ... > | "If this was the case of a military officer or an > | intelligence officer and they had this kind of behavior, > | they would be fired," he added. > | > | "This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless, > | incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified > | information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time > | error." > | ... ><https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5212589-warner-hegseth-waltz-intel-group-chat/> > > --bks > >They're DUI hires. I love that you take the word of a reporter from the Atlantic that there were any plans discussed in the chat. Selective belief system Bradley?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 11:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vs0ov9$kl2$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #1178517 |
>> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get.
>> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots,
>> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots.
>> | "This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless,
>> | incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified
>> | information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time
>> | error."
|
| Several days after top national security officials
| accidentally included a reporter in a Signal chat about
| bombing Houthi sites in Yemen, a Pentagon-wide advisory
| warned against using the messaging app, even for
| unclassified information.
|
| "A vulnerability has been identified in the Signal
| Messenger Application," begins the department-wide email,
| dated March 18 and obtained by NPR.
| ...
<https://www.npr.org/2025/03/25/nx-s1-5339801/pentagon-email-signal-vulnerability>
--bks
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 12:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vs0t36$ova$2@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #1178519 |
>>> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get.
>>> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots,
>>> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots.
>>> | "This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless,
>>> | incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified
>>> | information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time
>>> | error."
They just can't get their stories straight:
| ...
| So, inside 24 hours ... We've watched Hegseth flat-deny
| what seems pretty clear evidence of battle plans being
| leaked. We've watched Gabbard and Ratcliffe sitting side by
| side in the Senate giving jarringly different answers --
| one willing to respond, the other largely not. We've
| watched Waltz give deeply unconvincing performances in the
| Oval Office and on Fox. And we've watched Waltz and Trump
| seemingly contradict one another about who was or wasn't to
| blame. It's all been pretty messy, to say the least.
| ...
<https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2025/03/26/circling-the-wagons-00250066>
--bks
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 14:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vs11hb$l9k$2@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #1178532 |
>>>> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get.
>>>> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots,
>>>> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots.
|
| The information Secretary of Defense Hegseth disclosed in
| the Signal chat was classified at the time he wrote it,
| especially because the operation had not even started yet,
| according to a US defense official and another source who
| was briefed on the operation.
|
| "It is safe to say that anybody in uniform would be court
| martialed for this," the official said. "We don't provide
| that level of information on unclassified systems, in order
| to protect the lives and safety of the servicemembers
| carrying out these strikes. If we did, it would be wholly
| irresponsible. My most junior analysts know not to do this."
|
<https://x.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1904890815136039418>
| ...
| "It's inconceivable to me that people would not use the
| classified channels that the government has spent so much
| time and effort and money over decades trying to make as
| uncompromisable as they can," John Bolton, who has become a
| critic of Trump, told Here & Now. "And whether it's secure
| videos, secure telephones, secure text or email kinds of
| things, the channels are there. It's not like they don't
| exist. Why would you ever not use them?"
| ...
<https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2025/03/25/signal-leak-trump>
--bks
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 11:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bh68ujtd6p4q4urvg28ttdjing53la9tcq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1178547 |
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:04:27 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote: >>>>> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. >>>>> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, >>>>> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. > > | > | The information Secretary of Defense Hegseth disclosed in > | the Signal chat was classified at the time he wrote it, > | especially because the operation had not even started yet, > | according to a US defense official and another source who > | was briefed on the operation. > | > | "It is safe to say that anybody in uniform would be court > | martialed for this," the official said. "We don't provide > | that level of information on unclassified systems, in order > | to protect the lives and safety of the servicemembers > | carrying out these strikes. If we did, it would be wholly > | irresponsible. My most junior analysts know not to do this." > | ><https://x.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1904890815136039418> > > | ... > | "It's inconceivable to me that people would not use the > | classified channels that the government has spent so much > | time and effort and money over decades trying to make as > | uncompromisable as they can," John Bolton, who has become a > | critic of Trump, told Here & Now. "And whether it's secure > | videos, secure telephones, secure text or email kinds of > | things, the channels are there. It's not like they don't > | exist. Why would you ever not use them?" > | ... ><https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2025/03/25/signal-leak-trump> > > --bks <LOL> So says a CNN fruitcake....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 15:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vs1v6p$2o285$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1178552 |
On 26/3/25 8:16, Blue Lives Matter wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:04:27 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. > Sherman) wrote: > >>>>>> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. >>>>>> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, >>>>>> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. >> >> | >> | The information Secretary of Defense Hegseth disclosed in >> | the Signal chat was classified at the time he wrote it, >> | especially because the operation had not even started yet, >> | according to a US defense official and another source who >> | was briefed on the operation. >> | >> | "It is safe to say that anybody in uniform would be court >> | martialed for this," the official said. "We don't provide >> | that level of information on unclassified systems, in order >> | to protect the lives and safety of the servicemembers >> | carrying out these strikes. If we did, it would be wholly >> | irresponsible. My most junior analysts know not to do this." >> | >> <https://x.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1904890815136039418> >> >> | ... >> | "It's inconceivable to me that people would not use the >> | classified channels that the government has spent so much >> | time and effort and money over decades trying to make as >> | uncompromisable as they can," John Bolton, who has become a >> | critic of Trump, told Here & Now. "And whether it's secure >> | videos, secure telephones, secure text or email kinds of >> | things, the channels are there. It's not like they don't >> | exist. Why would you ever not use them?" >> | ... >> <https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2025/03/25/signal-leak-trump> >> >> --bks > > <LOL> So says a CNN fruitcake.... > Ted Striker: My orders came through. My squadron ships out tomorrow. We're bombing the storage depots at Daiquiri at 1800 hours. We're coming in from the north, below their radar. Elaine Dickinson: When will you be back? Ted Striker: I can't tell you that. It's classified. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-29 20:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <l74hujp0mnff68qvlj3thfdb5vdp6jou44@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1178599 |
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:30:58 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote: > >Ted Striker: >My orders came through. My squadron ships out tomorrow. We're >bombing the storage depots at Daiquiri at 1800 hours. We're >coming in from the north, below their radar. > >Elaine Dickinson: >When will you be back? > >Ted Striker: >I can't tell you that. It's classified. <G>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-27 07:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hccaujtm5op1gr5vkv6lpf3k242ddp3kgq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1178552 |
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:16:23 -0400, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.org> wrote: >On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:04:27 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. >Sherman) wrote: > >>>>>> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. >>>>>> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, >>>>>> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. >> >> | >> | The information Secretary of Defense Hegseth disclosed in >> | the Signal chat was classified at the time he wrote it, >> | especially because the operation had not even started yet, >> | according to a US defense official and another source who >> | was briefed on the operation. >> | >> | "It is safe to say that anybody in uniform would be court >> | martialed for this," the official said. "We don't provide >> | that level of information on unclassified systems, in order >> | to protect the lives and safety of the servicemembers >> | carrying out these strikes. If we did, it would be wholly >> | irresponsible. My most junior analysts know not to do this." >> | >><https://x.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1904890815136039418> >> >> | ... >> | "It's inconceivable to me that people would not use the >> | classified channels that the government has spent so much >> | time and effort and money over decades trying to make as >> | uncompromisable as they can," John Bolton, who has become a >> | critic of Trump, told Here & Now. "And whether it's secure >> | videos, secure telephones, secure text or email kinds of >> | things, the channels are there. It's not like they don't >> | exist. Why would you ever not use them?" >> | ... >><https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2025/03/25/signal-leak-trump> >> >> --bks > ><LOL> So says a CNN fruitcake.... And posted by Bradley, the leftist fruitcake.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-29 20:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <764hujhbkml7plrco8slm80rtjt86khef3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1178552 |
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:16:23 -0400, Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.org> wrote: >On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:04:27 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. >Sherman) wrote: > >>>>>> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. >>>>>> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, >>>>>> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. >> >> | >> | The information Secretary of Defense Hegseth disclosed in >> | the Signal chat was classified at the time he wrote it, >> | especially because the operation had not even started yet, >> | according to a US defense official and another source who >> | was briefed on the operation. >> | >> | "It is safe to say that anybody in uniform would be court >> | martialed for this," the official said. "We don't provide >> | that level of information on unclassified systems, in order >> | to protect the lives and safety of the servicemembers >> | carrying out these strikes. If we did, it would be wholly >> | irresponsible. My most junior analysts know not to do this." >> | >><https://x.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1904890815136039418> >> >> | ... >> | "It's inconceivable to me that people would not use the >> | classified channels that the government has spent so much >> | time and effort and money over decades trying to make as >> | uncompromisable as they can," John Bolton, who has become a >> | critic of Trump, told Here & Now. "And whether it's secure >> | videos, secure telephones, secure text or email kinds of >> | things, the channels are there. It's not like they don't >> | exist. Why would you ever not use them?" >> | ... >><https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2025/03/25/signal-leak-trump> >> >> --bks > ><LOL> So says a CNN fruitcake.... John Bolton is a CNN fruitcake? BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clave <ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 08:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <wnVEP.1299217$FVcd.328005@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #1178517 |
On 3/26/2025 4:32 AM, NoBody wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:35:43 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. > Sherman) wrote: > >>>>> | Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the >>>>> | Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than >>>>> | just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful, >>>>> | it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most >>>>> | dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank >>>>> | incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group >>>>> | chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the >>>>> | group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the >>>>> | country?) Yeah, it's a bad one. >> >> | >> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. >> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, >> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. >> | ... >> <https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/the-worst-and-the-dimmest> >> >> | >> | Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate >> | Intelligence Committee, criticized the Trump administration >> | for using a Signal group to discuss plans for carrying out >> | bombing in Yemen, calling on officials to resign and saying >> | others would have been fired for the same actions. >> | ... >> | "If this was the case of a military officer or an >> | intelligence officer and they had this kind of behavior, >> | they would be fired," he added. >> | >> | "This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless, >> | incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified >> | information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time >> | error." >> | ... >> <https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5212589-warner-hegseth-waltz-intel-group-chat/> >> >> --bks >> >> They're DUI hires. > > I love that you take the word of a reporter from the Atlantic that > there were any plans discussed in the chat. I love that you think they were only talking about the NCAA basketball tournament.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <none@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 10:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.424dd5b155380f23989745@usnews.blocknews.net> |
| In reply to | #1178555 |
In article <wnVEP.1299217$FVcd.328005@fx10.iad>, ChrisShitbagious@TheMonastery.com says... > > On 3/26/2025 4:32 AM, NoBody wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:35:43 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. > > Sherman) wrote: > > > >>>>> | Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the > >>>>> | Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than > >>>>> | just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful, > >>>>> | it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most > >>>>> | dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank > >>>>> | incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group > >>>>> | chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the > >>>>> | group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the > >>>>> | country?) Yeah, it's a bad one. > >> > >> | > >> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. > >> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, > >> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. > >> | ... > >> <https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/the-worst-and-the-dimmest> > >> > >> | > >> | Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate > >> | Intelligence Committee, criticized the Trump administration > >> | for using a Signal group to discuss plans for carrying out > >> | bombing in Yemen, calling on officials to resign and saying > >> | others would have been fired for the same actions. > >> | ... > >> | "If this was the case of a military officer or an > >> | intelligence officer and they had this kind of behavior, > >> | they would be fired," he added. > >> | > >> | "This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless, > >> | incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified > >> | information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time > >> | error." > >> | ... > >> <https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5212589-warner-hegseth-waltz-intel-group-chat/> > >> > >> --bks > >> > >> They're DUI hires. > > > > I love that you take the word of a reporter from the Atlantic that > > there were any plans discussed in the chat. > I love that you think they were only talking about the NCAA basketball tournament. Nothing classified was discussed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 18:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vs295a$30pqc$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1178555 |
On 26/3/25 8:50, Clave wrote: > On 3/26/2025 4:32 AM, NoBody wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:35:43 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com >> (Bradley K. >> Sherman) wrote: >> >>>>>> | Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the >>>>>> | Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than >>>>>> | just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful, >>>>>> | it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most >>>>>> | dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank >>>>>> | incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group >>>>>> | chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the >>>>>> | group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the >>>>>> | country?) Yeah, it's a bad one. >>> >>> | >>> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. >>> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, >>> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. >>> | ... >>> <https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/the-worst-and-the-dimmest> >>> >>> | >>> | Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate >>> | Intelligence Committee, criticized the Trump administration >>> | for using a Signal group to discuss plans for carrying out >>> | bombing in Yemen, calling on officials to resign and saying >>> | others would have been fired for the same actions. >>> | ... >>> | "If this was the case of a military officer or an >>> | intelligence officer and they had this kind of behavior, >>> | they would be fired," he added. >>> | >>> | "This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless, >>> | incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified >>> | information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time >>> | error." >>> | ... >>> <https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5212589-warner-hegseth-waltz-intel-group-chat/> >>> >>> >>> --bks >>> >>> They're DUI hires. >> >> I love that you take the word of a reporter from the Atlantic that >> there were any plans discussed in the chat. > I love that you think they were only talking about the NCAA > basketball tournament. Everyone can point to transcripts, but unperson would point out it is paywalled, incomplete, inaccurate, his dog ate the url, and nobody told him anything. I know nuffink! nuffink! -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Voigtlander <jacque.idiot.pal@number.2> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 08:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <lpVEP.1299224$FVcd.367157@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #1178517 |
On 3/26/2025 4:32 AM, NoBody wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:35:43 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. > Sherman) wrote: > >>>>> | Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the >>>>> | Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than >>>>> | just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful, >>>>> | it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most >>>>> | dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank >>>>> | incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group >>>>> | chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the >>>>> | group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the >>>>> | country?) Yeah, it's a bad one. >> >> | >> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. >> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, >> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. >> | ... >> <https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/the-worst-and-the-dimmest> >> >> | >> | Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate >> | Intelligence Committee, criticized the Trump administration >> | for using a Signal group to discuss plans for carrying out >> | bombing in Yemen, calling on officials to resign and saying >> | others would have been fired for the same actions. >> | ... >> | "If this was the case of a military officer or an >> | intelligence officer and they had this kind of behavior, >> | they would be fired," he added. >> | >> | "This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless, >> | incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified >> | information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time >> | error." >> | ... >> <https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5212589-warner-hegseth-waltz-intel-group-chat/> >> >> --bks >> >> They're DUI hires. > > I love that you take the word of a reporter from the Atlantic that > there were any plans discussed in the chat. Top secret plans for military strikes on Yemen is what they were discussing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <none@none.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 10:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.424dd5d2c4c196ee989746@usnews.blocknews.net> |
| In reply to | #1178556 |
In article <lpVEP.1299224$FVcd.367157@fx10.iad>, jacque.idiot.pal@number.2 says... > > On 3/26/2025 4:32 AM, NoBody wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:35:43 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. > > Sherman) wrote: > > > >>>>> | Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the > >>>>> | Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than > >>>>> | just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful, > >>>>> | it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most > >>>>> | dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank > >>>>> | incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group > >>>>> | chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the > >>>>> | group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the > >>>>> | country?) Yeah, it's a bad one. > >> > >> | > >> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. > >> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, > >> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. > >> | ... > >> <https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/the-worst-and-the-dimmest> > >> > >> | > >> | Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate > >> | Intelligence Committee, criticized the Trump administration > >> | for using a Signal group to discuss plans for carrying out > >> | bombing in Yemen, calling on officials to resign and saying > >> | others would have been fired for the same actions. > >> | ... > >> | "If this was the case of a military officer or an > >> | intelligence officer and they had this kind of behavior, > >> | they would be fired," he added. > >> | > >> | "This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless, > >> | incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified > >> | information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time > >> | error." > >> | ... > >> <https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5212589-warner-hegseth-waltz-intel-group-chat/> > >> > >> --bks > >> > >> They're DUI hires. > > > > I love that you take the word of a reporter from the Atlantic that > > there were any plans discussed in the chat. > > Top secret plans for military strikes on Yemen is what they were discussing. Nothing classified.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 22:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vs201f$2lkq2$13@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1178559 |
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote: > In article <lpVEP.1299224$FVcd.367157@fx10.iad>, > jacque.idiot.pal@number.2 says... >> >> On 3/26/2025 4:32 AM, NoBody wrote: >> > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:35:43 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. >> > Sherman) wrote: >> > >> >>>>> | Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the >> >>>>> | Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than >> >>>>> | just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful, >> >>>>> | it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most >> >>>>> | dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank >> >>>>> | incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group >> >>>>> | chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the >> >>>>> | group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the >> >>>>> | country?) Yeah, it's a bad one. >> >> >> >> | >> >> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. >> >> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, >> >> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. >> >> | ... >> >> <https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/the-worst-and-the-dimmest> >> >> >> >> | >> >> | Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate >> >> | Intelligence Committee, criticized the Trump administration >> >> | for using a Signal group to discuss plans for carrying out >> >> | bombing in Yemen, calling on officials to resign and saying >> >> | others would have been fired for the same actions. >> >> | ... >> >> | "If this was the case of a military officer or an >> >> | intelligence officer and they had this kind of behavior, >> >> | they would be fired," he added. >> >> | >> >> | "This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless, >> >> | incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified >> >> | information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time >> >> | error." >> >> | ... >> >> <https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5212589-warner-hegseth-waltz-intel-group-chat/> >> >> >> >> --bks >> >> >> >> They're DUI hires. >> > >> > I love that you take the word of a reporter from the Atlantic that >> > there were any plans discussed in the chat. >> >> Top secret plans for military strikes on Yemen is what they were discussing. > > Nothing classified. And the attacks were executed perfectly as designed. That's the part the libbys leave out. -- pothead Liberalism Is A Mental Disease Treat it accordingly <https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14512427/Doctors-reveal-symptoms-Trump-Derangement-Syndrome-tell-youve-got-it.html>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-27 07:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5fcaujh4mg6l192j05re65r1b91et2rgh8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #1178602 |
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 22:45:03 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote: >On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote: >> In article <lpVEP.1299224$FVcd.367157@fx10.iad>, >> jacque.idiot.pal@number.2 says... >>> >>> On 3/26/2025 4:32 AM, NoBody wrote: >>> > On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:35:43 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. >>> > Sherman) wrote: >>> > >>> >>>>> | Because let's be clear ... This is damaging stuff for the >>> >>>>> | Trump administration. As a story, Signalgate is more than >>> >>>>> | just a serious breach of national security. It's colorful, >>> >>>>> | it's visual, it's easy to understand and it raises the most >>> >>>>> | dangerous charge of all for any government -- one of rank >>> >>>>> | incompetence. (They discussed military secrets in a group >>> >>>>> | chat? They accidentally invited a journalist to join the >>> >>>>> | group, and didn't notice? These guys are running the >>> >>>>> | country?) Yeah, it's a bad one. >>> >> >>> >> | >>> >> | My high-level takeaway is "what you see is what you get. >>> >> | These guys might look like idiots, and talk like idiots, >>> >> | but don't let that fool you: they really are idiots. >>> >> | ... >>> >> <https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/the-worst-and-the-dimmest> >>> >> >>> >> | >>> >> | Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate >>> >> | Intelligence Committee, criticized the Trump administration >>> >> | for using a Signal group to discuss plans for carrying out >>> >> | bombing in Yemen, calling on officials to resign and saying >>> >> | others would have been fired for the same actions. >>> >> | ... >>> >> | "If this was the case of a military officer or an >>> >> | intelligence officer and they had this kind of behavior, >>> >> | they would be fired," he added. >>> >> | >>> >> | "This is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless, >>> >> | incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified >>> >> | information, that this is not a one-off or a first-time >>> >> | error." >>> >> | ... >>> >> <https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5212589-warner-hegseth-waltz-intel-group-chat/> >>> >> >>> >> --bks >>> >> >>> >> They're DUI hires. >>> > >>> > I love that you take the word of a reporter from the Atlantic that >>> > there were any plans discussed in the chat. >>> >>> Top secret plans for military strikes on Yemen is what they were discussing. >> >> Nothing classified. > >And the attacks were executed perfectly as designed. >That's the part the libbys leave out. That's why they're inventing this non-story - to avoid giving Trump credit for good work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | talk.politics.misc
csiph-web