Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > talk.environment > #10574 > unrolled thread

Justice Department sues Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont and New York over state climate actions

Back to article view | Back to talk.environment

Contents

  Justice Department sues Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont and New York over state climate actions useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> - 2025-05-02 06:28 +0000
    Re: Justice Department sues Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont and New York over state climate actions Ted Houser <tedhxxxxx@dont-email.me> - 2025-05-02 16:41 -0700
      Re: Justice Department sues Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont and New York over state climate actions Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-05-03 01:45 +0000
        Re: Justice Department sues Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont and New York over state climate actions "b.s.66" <bs66@indymedia.org> - 2025-05-03 04:18 +0000
          Re: Justice Department sues Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont and New York over state climate actions Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 21:27 -0400
            Re: Justice Department sues Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont and New York over state climate actions Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 17:51 -0400

#10574 — Justice Department sues Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont and New York over state climate actions

DETROIT (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department filed lawsuits against four 
states this week, claiming their climate actions conflict with federal 
authority and President Donald Trump’senergy dominance agenda.

The DOJ on Wednesday filed lawsuits against Hawaii and Michigan over their 
plans for legal action against fossil fuel companies for harms caused by 
climate change. On Thursday, the DOJ sued New York and Vermont, 
challenging their climate superfund laws that would force fossil fuel 
companies to pay into state-based funds based on previous greenhouse gas 
emissions.

“These burdensome and ideologically motivated laws and lawsuits threaten 
American energy independence and our country’s economic and national 
security,” Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement, noting the 
office hopes to stop “these illegitimate impediments to the production of 
affordable, reliable energy that Americans deserve.”

The DOJ lawsuits, which legal experts called unprecedented, mark the 
latest of the Trump administration’s attacks on environmental work and 
raises concern over states’ abilities to retain the power to take climate 
action without federal opposition.

The DOJ’s four filings said the state efforts undermine the federal 
government while “increasing energy costs and disrupting the national 
energy market.” It said the states’ plans and policies are 
unconstitutional, violate the federal foreign affairs power and are 
preempted by the Clean Air Act — a federal law authorizing the 
Environmental Protection Agency to regulate air emissions.


The DOJ argued the act “creates a program for regulating air pollution in 
the United States and ‘displaces’ the ability of States to regulate 
greenhouse gas emissions beyond their borders.”

It said Wednesday that Hawaii and Michigan battling oil and gas companies 
for alleged climate damage conflicts with EPA authority and obstructs the 
agency’s discretion to regulate greenhouse gases.

When burned, fossil fuels release emissions such as carbon dioxide that 
warm the planet.

Spokespeople for Democratic Hawaii Gov. Josh Green and Hawaii Attorney 
General Anne Lopez confirmed the state filed its lawsuit against seven 
groups of affiliated fossil fuel companies and the oil and gas trade 
association, the American Petroleum Institute, Thursday, alleging harm to 
public trust resources, negligence and more.

Green said he is targeting fossil fuel companies that should take 
responsibility for their role in the state’s climate impacts, including 
2023’s deadly Lahaina wildfire.

“This lawsuit is about holding those parties accountable, shifting the 
costs of surviving the climate crisis back where they belong, and 
protecting Hawaii citizens into the future,” he said in a statement.

Meanwhile, Democratic Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel last year 
tapped private law firms to go after the fossil fuel industry for 
negatively affecting the state’s climate and environment.

“This lawsuit is at best frivolous and arguably sanctionable,” Nessel said 
in a statement Thursday. Nessel noted that Michigan hasn’t yet filed its 
lawsuit, but confirmed her intent to, and said the White House and the oil 
industry “will not succeed in any attempt to preemptively bar our access 
to make our claims in the courts.” A spokesperson for Democratic Michigan 
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s office deferred to Nessel when asked for comment.

Thursday’s filings called the states’ Superfund Acts — modeled after the 
45-year-old federal superfund law enacted to address the harm associated 
with hazardous waste sites — “a transparent monetary-extraction scheme.” 
Trump has said the superfund laws “extort” money from energy entities.

New York is looking for $75 billion and has been previously challenged by 
22 states for its law; Vermont hasn’t specified its target amount. Both 
laws were approved last year.

The DOJ argued the states’ acts are also looking to regulate greenhouse 
gas emissions — nationwide and globally — violating federal government 
authority, along with discouraging “investment and innovation in the 
fossil fuel industry, further burdening interstate commerce.”

A spokesperson for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, said the 
governor “believes corporate polluters should pay for the damage done to 
our environment — not everyday New Yorkers. We will not back down, not 
from Big Oil, and not from federal overreach.”

New York Attorney General Letitia James said the state’s climate superfund 
law “ensures that those who contributed to the climate crisis help pay for 
the damage they caused.”

Vermont Attorney General Charity Clark said she looked forward to 
representing Vermont in this case. Vermont Gov. Phil Scott’s office did 
not immediately respond to request for comment.

In its filings, the DOJ repeated the Republican president’s claims of 
America’s energy emergency and crisis.

“At a time when States should be contributing to a national effort to 
secure reliable sources of domestic energy,” all four states are choosing 
“to stand in the way,” the filings said.

Legal experts raised concern over the government’s arguments.

Michael Gerrard, founder and faculty director of the Columbia University 
Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, said it’s typically the case that the 
DOJ asks a court to intervene in pending environmental litigation — as is 
the case in some instances across the country.

While this week’s suits are consistent with Trump’s plans to oppose state 
actions that interfere with energy dominance, “it’s highly unusual,” 
Gerrard told The Associated Press of the cases of Hawaii and Michigan. 
“What we expected is they would intervene in the pending lawsuits, not to 
try to preempt or prevent a lawsuit from being filed. It’s an aggressive 
move in support of the fossil fuel industry.”

Ann Carlson, an environmental law professor at the University of 
California, Los Angeles, who has previously consulted on climate 
litigation, noted that EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said his agency is 
seeking to overturn a finding under the Clean Air Act that greenhouse 
gases endanger public health and welfare.

“On the one hand the U.S. is saying Michigan, and other states, can’t 
regulate greenhouse gases because the Clean Air Act does so and therefore 
preempts states from regulating,” Carlson said. “On the other hand the 
U.S. is trying to say that the Clean Air Act should not be used to 
regulate.”

Trump’s administration has aggressively targeted climate policy in the 
name of fossil fuel investment. Federal agencies have announced plans to 
bolster coal power, roll back landmark water and air regulations, block 
renewable energy sources and double down on oil and gas expansion.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-doj-climate-states-policy-lawsuits-
a5228e1dd6348f09d2a70f460142531a

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#10575

On 5/2/2025 6:00 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in
> news:XnsB2D2EEC70DCCDBX@135.181.20.170:
> 
>> DETROIT (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department filed lawsuits against four
>> states this week, claiming their climate actions conflict with federal
>> authority and President Donald Trump’senergy dominance agenda.
> 
>       So much for "states rights"................

States don't have the right to contradict or supersede federal policies.

Where did you go to school, boy?  They start teaching that sort of thing 
in 7th grade American Government.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#10576

Ted Houser <tedhxxxxx@dont-email.me> wrote in
news:vv3l6i$3usod$4@news.tcpreset.net: 

> On 5/2/2025 6:00 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in
>> news:XnsB2D2EEC70DCCDBX@135.181.20.170:
>> 
>>> DETROIT (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department filed lawsuits against
>>> four states this week, claiming their climate actions conflict with
>>> federal authority and President Donald Trump’senergy dominance
>>> agenda. 
>> 
>>       So much for "states rights"................
> 
> States don't have the right to contradict or supersede federal
> policies. 
> 

      That is not being done.  The Supremacy Clause 
of the Constitution only applies where state laws 
confict - and are not merely different - with federal 
ones. 

     If the Oregon state income tax has a tax credit 
for solar panels or EV's or bird feeders that is a 
difference - not a conflict - with federal tax law 
policy. 





 








   

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#10577

On 02 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2D3D360E2EF5629555@185.151.15.190: 

> Ted Houser <tedhxxxxx@dont-email.me> wrote in
> news:vv3l6i$3usod$4@news.tcpreset.net: 
> 
>> On 5/2/2025 6:00 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in
>>> news:XnsB2D2EEC70DCCDBX@135.181.20.170:
>>> 
>>>> DETROIT (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department filed lawsuits against
>>>> four states this week, claiming their climate actions conflict with
>>>> federal authority and President Donald Trump’senergy dominance
>>>> agenda. 
>>> 
>>>       So much for "states rights"................
>> 
>> States don't have the right to contradict or supersede federal
>> policies. 
>> 
> 
>       That is not being done.  

Yes it is.  The state legislation attempts to regulate greenhouse
emissions nationwide and globally.  It's total bullshit because it's an
attempt to make the oil companies liable for any imaginary cause and
affect crap politicians can dream up to extort money from them. 

Vermont is the worst.  It's a useless state of welfare parasites.  They 
refuse to permit industry to build and operate while demanding the federal 
government hand them money for nothing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#10578

On Sat, 3 May 2025 04:18:26 -0000 (UTC), "b.s.66" <bs66@indymedia.org>
wrote:

>On 02 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
>news:XnsB2D3D360E2EF5629555@185.151.15.190: 
>
>> Ted Houser <tedhxxxxx@dont-email.me> wrote in
>> news:vv3l6i$3usod$4@news.tcpreset.net: 
>> 
>>> On 5/2/2025 6:00 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>> useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in
>>>> news:XnsB2D2EEC70DCCDBX@135.181.20.170:
>>>> 
>>>>> DETROIT (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department filed lawsuits against
>>>>> four states this week, claiming their climate actions conflict with
>>>>> federal authority and President Donald Trump’senergy dominance
>>>>> agenda. 
>>>> 
>>>>       So much for "states rights"................
>>> 
>>> States don't have the right to contradict or supersede federal
>>> policies. 
>>> 
>> 
>>       That is not being done.  
>
>Yes it is.  

No it's not.

>The state legislation attempts to regulate greenhouse
>emissions nationwide and globally.  It's total bullshit because it's an
>attempt to make the oil companies liable for any imaginary cause and
>affect crap politicians can dream up to extort money from them. 

You're hysterical.  Slow down and try that again with logic.

>Vermont is the worst.  It's a useless state of welfare parasites.  They 
>refuse to permit industry to build and operate while demanding the federal 
>government hand them money for nothing.

Show me on the doll where the bad state hurt you.
--  
MAGA wants to kiss off all the amendments since the Twelfth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#10579

On Sun, 04 May 2025 21:27:02 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 3 May 2025 04:18:26 -0000 (UTC), "b.s.66" <bs66@indymedia.org>
>wrote:
>
>>On 02 May 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
>>news:XnsB2D3D360E2EF5629555@185.151.15.190: 
>>
>>> Ted Houser <tedhxxxxx@dont-email.me> wrote in
>>> news:vv3l6i$3usod$4@news.tcpreset.net: 
>>> 
>>>> On 5/2/2025 6:00 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:XnsB2D2EEC70DCCDBX@135.181.20.170:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> DETROIT (AP) — The U.S. Justice Department filed lawsuits against
>>>>>> four states this week, claiming their climate actions conflict with
>>>>>> federal authority and President Donald Trump’senergy dominance
>>>>>> agenda. 
>>>>> 
>>>>>       So much for "states rights"................
>>>> 
>>>> States don't have the right to contradict or supersede federal
>>>> policies. 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>       That is not being done.  
>>
>>Yes it is.  
>
>No it's not.
>
>>The state legislation attempts to regulate greenhouse
>>emissions nationwide and globally.  It's total bullshit because it's an
>>attempt to make the oil companies liable for any imaginary cause and
>>affect crap politicians can dream up to extort money from them. 
>
>You're hysterical.  Slow down and try that again with logic.
>
>>Vermont is the worst.  It's a useless state of welfare parasites.  They 
>>refuse to permit industry to build and operate while demanding the federal 
>>government hand them money for nothing.
>
>Show me on the doll where the bad state hurt you.


<crickets>

Yet another right wing extremist does a drive by thinking it's going
to convince anybody.

-- 
MAGA wants to kiss off all the amendments since the Twelfth.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | talk.environment

csiph-web