Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > talk.bizarre > #36086 > unrolled thread

Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL!

Back to article view | Back to talk.bizarre

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 07:40 -0500
    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-08 13:19 +0000
      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-09 03:21 +0000
        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-09 03:26 +0000
          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-09 14:46 +0000
            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-09 10:37 -0600
              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-10 00:39 +0000
                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-09 20:57 -0600
            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Brandon Dickenbacher <bdickenbacher@maga2028.com> - 2025-04-09 21:08 +0000
              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-09 22:29 +0000
                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-04-09 19:33 -0400
                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-09 23:40 +0000
                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-09 19:51 -0700
                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:07 -0400
                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-04-11 08:44 -0400
                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 06:45 -0400
                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! usa 1st <nobody@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 04:25 +0000
                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 23:39 -0500
                            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Think-It-Thru <dems@dont.org> - 2025-04-12 19:34 +0000
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 12:55 -0700
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-12 19:51 -0700
                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-04-13 14:25 -0400
                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-14 23:59 +0000
                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> - 2025-04-14 18:25 -0700
                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-15 02:59 +0000
                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Klaus  Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> - 2025-04-15 04:03 -0700
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-04-15 08:53 -0400
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-15 06:58 -0700
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Klaus  Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> - 2025-04-15 08:57 -0700
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-16 08:29 -0400
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-15 15:11 +0000
                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-15 05:37 -0600
                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Tariffying <tariffying@usa.org> - 2025-04-15 19:11 +0000
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-15 15:13 -0600
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-17 13:43 -0500
                                            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-17 13:43 -0600
                                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-17 18:20 -0500
                                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-17 17:45 -0600
                                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 22:12 -0400
                                                    Trump branded citienship experiences Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 01:32 -0400
                                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 03:14 -0500
                                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-18 04:38 -0700
                                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! King <x@y.com> - 2025-04-19 00:38 +0000
                                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 03:12 -0500
                                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! King <x@y.com> - 2025-04-19 00:37 +0000
                                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 03:13 -0500
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 15:51 -0400
                                            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 03:16 -0500
                                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-18 04:10 -0700
                                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 06:18 -0500
                                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! King <x@y.com> - 2025-04-19 00:38 +0000
                                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Praetor Mandrak <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-20 14:18 -0500
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-16 02:07 +0000
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-16 00:18 -0500
                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-04-15 08:50 -0400
                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> - 2025-04-13 11:54 -0700
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 23:38 -0400
                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 02:07 -0500
                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-14 03:12 -0400
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-12 22:14 -0700
                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 02:16 -0500
                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-14 03:14 -0400
                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 23:36 -0400
                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Brandon Dickenbacher <bdickenbacher@maga2028.com> - 2025-04-10 04:25 +0000
                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-09 21:50 -0700
                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:21 -0400
                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-10 21:16 -0700
                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 06:45 -0400
                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-10 13:31 +0000
                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-10 08:09 -0600
                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-10 15:06 -0400
                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-10 12:31 -0700
                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 05:33 -0400
                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-12 09:30 -0700
                            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-12 18:35 +0000
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Harry Bristol <hbristol@redchecks.com> - 2025-04-12 23:18 +0000
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-12 17:00 -0700
                            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Harry Bristol <hbristol@redchecks.com> - 2025-04-12 23:14 +0000
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-13 01:36 +0000
                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-13 05:57 -0600
                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 07:45 -0500
                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-13 07:20 -0600
                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 09:43 -0500
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 07:45 -0700
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 10:24 -0500
                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 06:38 -0700
                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 09:45 -0500
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! J. Carter <jcarter@dont-email.me> - 2025-04-14 03:05 +0200
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 20:16 -0500
                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:22 -0400
                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-09 19:48 -0700
                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:25 -0400
        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-09 06:51 -0600
          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-09 15:04 +0000
            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-09 10:37 -0600
            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-09 18:03 +0000
              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Brandon Dickenbacher <bdickenbacher@maga2028.com> - 2025-04-10 04:07 +0000
                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-10 13:27 +0000
                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-10 08:08 -0600
                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:28 -0400
          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Roderick <adrastea2050@live.com> - 2025-04-10 00:38 +0200
    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 02:08 -0400

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

#36186

Skeeter OG wrote:
> In article <1759116049.766624698.189647.recscuba_google-
> huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>>> In article <386740613.766608177.276769.recscuba_google-
>>> huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>
>>>> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <vtmb1r$29s$3@toxic.dizum.net>,
>>>>> tariffying@usa.org says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14 Apr 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
>>>>>> news:vtki2v$2qctt$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:hAiLP.1811025$2zn8.541841@fx15.iad:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/13/2025 11:25 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Siri Cruz  <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/4/25 12:34, Think-It-Thru wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> The employees would actually make out better with the lower wages
>>>>>>>>>>> because they qualified for various forms of public assistance.
>>>>>>>>>>> With the increases, it lifted many just over a threshold where they
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't qualify for some anymore.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Welfare programs are *not* a subsidy to employers. They *increase* the
>>>>>>>> average wage that employers have to pay.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ah, yes - Republiturd math.  Never mind that most WalMart employees
>>>>>>> (among others) don't earn enough to make a living and have to go on
>>>>>>> Welfare.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's how it works for low-skilled / low-paid workers doing non-career
>>>>>> jobs in other countries.  Why should the USA be different?  The major
>>>>>> difference is they have to apply every month by a certain date or lose
>>>>>> their benefit for that month.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ============
>>>>>>> Walmart and McDonald?s are among the top employers of beneficiaries of
>>>>>>> federal aid programs like Medicaid and food stamps, according to a study
>>>>>>> by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office released Wednesday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/19/walmart-and-mcdonalds-among-top-
>>>>>>> employers-of-medicaid-and-food-stamp-beneficiaries.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ============
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If WalMart wages are so high, why are most of their employees getting
>>>>>>> food stamps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unskilled workers don't rate premium wages.  You got different kinds of
>>>>>> people working at Walmart.  Undependable kids whose motivation doesn't
>>>>>> enable them to do anything but operate a smart phone.  Dependable kids
>>>>>> working their way through college or trade school, parents and retirees
>>>>>> making ends meet with an extra job.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> An indirect subsidy is still a subsidy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The US has been subsidizing most of the planet at taxpayer expense thanks
>>>>>> to Democrats.  That era has ended.
>>>>>
>>>>> My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He
>>>>> doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car,
>>>>> pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still
>>>>> has money. I call bull.
>>>>
>>>> Is he still single?
>>>> Is he still living at home?
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>
>>> Doesn't matter.
>>>
>>
>> ?Doesn?t matter??
>>
>> I call bull.  Because there?s means tests.
>> Look it up, Walt.
>>
>> -hh
> 
> What?
> 
It's right there on your screen.  Look it up, Walt.  Isn't that your 
name.  Don't tell me it's Skeeter Origiaan Gangbanger.  Hello my name is 
SKeeter-Coward.  What?
-- 
Know what I mean?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36190

On 18/4/25 1:14, Mandrake the Perihelion wrote:
> Skeeter OG wrote:
>> In article <1759116049.766624698.189647.recscuba_google-
>> huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>
>>> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <386740613.766608177.276769.recscuba_google-
>>>> huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <vtmb1r$29s$3@toxic.dizum.net>,
>>>>>> tariffying@usa.org says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 14 Apr 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com>
>>>>>>> posted some
>>>>>>> news:vtki2v$2qctt$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:hAiLP.1811025$2zn8.541841@fx15.iad:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/13/2025 11:25 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Siri Cruz  <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/4/25 12:34, Think-It-Thru wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> The employees would actually make out better with the
>>>>>>>>>>>> lower wages
>>>>>>>>>>>> because they qualified for various forms of public
>>>>>>>>>>>> assistance.
>>>>>>>>>>>> With the increases, it lifted many just over a
>>>>>>>>>>>> threshold where they
>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't qualify for some anymore.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Welfare programs are *not* a subsidy to employers. They
>>>>>>>>> *increase* the
>>>>>>>>> average wage that employers have to pay.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ah, yes - Republiturd math.  Never mind that most WalMart
>>>>>>>> employees
>>>>>>>> (among others) don't earn enough to make a living and
>>>>>>>> have to go on
>>>>>>>> Welfare.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's how it works for low-skilled / low-paid workers
>>>>>>> doing non-career
>>>>>>> jobs in other countries.  Why should the USA be
>>>>>>> different?  The major
>>>>>>> difference is they have to apply every month by a certain
>>>>>>> date or lose
>>>>>>> their benefit for that month.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ============
>>>>>>>> Walmart and McDonald?s are among the top employers of
>>>>>>>> beneficiaries of
>>>>>>>> federal aid programs like Medicaid and food stamps,
>>>>>>>> according to a study
>>>>>>>> by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office
>>>>>>>> released Wednesday.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/19/walmart-and-mcdonalds-among-top-
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> employers-of-medicaid-and-food-stamp-beneficiaries.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ============
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If WalMart wages are so high, why are most of their
>>>>>>>> employees getting
>>>>>>>> food stamps?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unskilled workers don't rate premium wages.  You got
>>>>>>> different kinds of
>>>>>>> people working at Walmart.  Undependable kids whose
>>>>>>> motivation doesn't
>>>>>>> enable them to do anything but operate a smart phone.
>>>>>>> Dependable kids
>>>>>>> working their way through college or trade school, parents
>>>>>>> and retirees
>>>>>>> making ends meet with an extra job.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> An indirect subsidy is still a subsidy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The US has been subsidizing most of the planet at taxpayer
>>>>>>> expense thanks
>>>>>>> to Democrats.  That era has ended.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He
>>>>>> doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car,
>>>>>> pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still
>>>>>> has money. I call bull.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is he still single?
>>>>> Is he still living at home?
>>>>>
>>>>> -hh
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't matter.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ?Doesn?t matter??
>>>
>>> I call bull.  Because there?s means tests.
>>> Look it up, Walt.
>>>
>>> -hh
>>
>> What?
>>
> It's right there on your screen.  Look it up, Walt.  Isn't that
> your name.  Don't tell me it's Skeeter Origiaan Gangbanger.
> Hello my name is SKeeter-Coward.  What?

Princess Organa Gangbanger?

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36193

>On 18/4/25 1:14, Mandrake the Perihelion wrote:
>> Skeeter OG wrote:
>>> In article <1759116049.766624698.189647.recscuba_google-
>>> huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>
>>>> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <386740613.766608177.276769.recscuba_google-
>>>>> huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vtmb1r$29s$3@toxic.dizum.net>,
>>>>>>> tariffying@usa.org says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 14 Apr 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com>
>>>>>>>> posted some
>>>>>>>> news:vtki2v$2qctt$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:hAiLP.1811025$2zn8.541841@fx15.iad:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/13/2025 11:25 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Siri Cruz  <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/4/25 12:34, Think-It-Thru wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The employees would actually make out better with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lower wages
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because they qualified for various forms of public
>>>>>>>>>>>>> assistance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> With the increases, it lifted many just over a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> threshold where they
>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't qualify for some anymore.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Welfare programs are *not* a subsidy to employers. They
>>>>>>>>>> *increase* the
>>>>>>>>>> average wage that employers have to pay.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ah, yes - Republiturd math.  Never mind that most WalMart
>>>>>>>>> employees
>>>>>>>>> (among others) don't earn enough to make a living and
>>>>>>>>> have to go on
>>>>>>>>> Welfare.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's how it works for low-skilled / low-paid workers
>>>>>>>> doing non-career
>>>>>>>> jobs in other countries.  Why should the USA be
>>>>>>>> different?  The major
>>>>>>>> difference is they have to apply every month by a certain
>>>>>>>> date or lose
>>>>>>>> their benefit for that month.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ============
>>>>>>>>> Walmart and McDonald?s are among the top employers of
>>>>>>>>> beneficiaries of
>>>>>>>>> federal aid programs like Medicaid and food stamps,
>>>>>>>>> according to a study
>>>>>>>>> by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office
>>>>>>>>> released Wednesday.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/19/walmart-and-mcdonalds-among-top-
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> employers-of-medicaid-and-food-stamp-beneficiaries.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ============
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If WalMart wages are so high, why are most of their
>>>>>>>>> employees getting
>>>>>>>>> food stamps?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unskilled workers don't rate premium wages.  You got
>>>>>>>> different kinds of
>>>>>>>> people working at Walmart.  Undependable kids whose
>>>>>>>> motivation doesn't
>>>>>>>> enable them to do anything but operate a smart phone.
>>>>>>>> Dependable kids
>>>>>>>> working their way through college or trade school, parents
>>>>>>>> and retirees
>>>>>>>> making ends meet with an extra job.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> An indirect subsidy is still a subsidy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The US has been subsidizing most of the planet at taxpayer
>>>>>>>> expense thanks
>>>>>>>> to Democrats.  That era has ended.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He
>>>>>>> doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car,
>>>>>>> pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still
>>>>>>> has money. I call bull.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is he still single?
>>>>>> Is he still living at home?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't matter.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ?Doesn?t matter??
>>>>
>>>> I call bull.  Because there?s means tests.
>>>> Look it up, Walt.
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>
>>> What?
>>>
>> It's right there on your screen.  Look it up, Walt.  Isn't that
>> your name.  Don't tell me it's Skeeter Origiaan Gangbanger.
>> Hello my name is SKeeter-Coward.  What?
>
>Princess Organa Gangbanger?
>

Trump whines like a homosexual.  And to think he claims he's never had it 
in the ass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36184

-hh wrote:
> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>> In article <386740613.766608177.276769.recscuba_google-
>> huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>
>>> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <vtmb1r$29s$3@toxic.dizum.net>,
>>>> tariffying@usa.org says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 14 Apr 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
>>>>> news:vtki2v$2qctt$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> wrote in
>>>>>> news:hAiLP.1811025$2zn8.541841@fx15.iad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/13/2025 11:25 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
>>>>>>>> Siri Cruz  <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12/4/25 12:34, Think-It-Thru wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The employees would actually make out better with the lower wages
>>>>>>>>>> because they qualified for various forms of public assistance.
>>>>>>>>>> With the increases, it lifted many just over a threshold where they
>>>>>>>>>> didn't qualify for some anymore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Welfare programs are *not* a subsidy to employers. They *increase* the
>>>>>>> average wage that employers have to pay.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ah, yes - Republiturd math.  Never mind that most WalMart employees
>>>>>> (among others) don't earn enough to make a living and have to go on
>>>>>> Welfare.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's how it works for low-skilled / low-paid workers doing non-career
>>>>> jobs in other countries.  Why should the USA be different?  The major
>>>>> difference is they have to apply every month by a certain date or lose
>>>>> their benefit for that month.
>>>>>
>>>>>> ============
>>>>>> Walmart and McDonald?s are among the top employers of beneficiaries of
>>>>>> federal aid programs like Medicaid and food stamps, according to a study
>>>>>> by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office released Wednesday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/19/walmart-and-mcdonalds-among-top-
>>>>>> employers-of-medicaid-and-food-stamp-beneficiaries.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ============
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If WalMart wages are so high, why are most of their employees getting
>>>>>> food stamps?
>>>>>
>>>>> Unskilled workers don't rate premium wages.  You got different kinds of
>>>>> people working at Walmart.  Undependable kids whose motivation doesn't
>>>>> enable them to do anything but operate a smart phone.  Dependable kids
>>>>> working their way through college or trade school, parents and retirees
>>>>> making ends meet with an extra job.
>>>>>
>>>>>> An indirect subsidy is still a subsidy.
>>>>>
>>>>> The US has been subsidizing most of the planet at taxpayer expense thanks
>>>>> to Democrats.  That era has ended.
>>>>
>>>> My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He
>>>> doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car,
>>>> pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still
>>>> has money. I call bull.
>>>
>>> Is he still single?
>>> Is he still living at home?
>>>
>>> -hh
>>
>> Doesn't matter.
>>
> 
> “Doesn’t matter”?
> 
> I call bull.  Because there’s means tests.
> Look it up, Walt.

I've found similar results.  I know who I am.  It took several rolls of 
the die to achieve the result I was looking at with strong feelings of 
sharpened steel.  One whiff of that.  I'll tell you more when we were 
further along.  Because Disney and stuff.  Nobody's better than anyone 
else,  here.  Look what they do to you.  You must be joking if you think 
you can opt out of the tests.  You will need it at some point in your 
life or you haven't hit bottom yet.  I think we've all done that in the 
2020s by now.
-- 
Know what I mean?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36192

>-hh wrote:
>> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>>> In article <386740613.766608177.276769.recscuba_google-
>>> huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>
>>>> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <vtmb1r$29s$3@toxic.dizum.net>,
>>>>> tariffying@usa.org says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14 Apr 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
>>>>>> news:vtki2v$2qctt$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:hAiLP.1811025$2zn8.541841@fx15.iad:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/13/2025 11:25 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Siri Cruz  <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/4/25 12:34, Think-It-Thru wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> The employees would actually make out better with the lower
>>>>>>>>>>> wages because they qualified for various forms of public
>>>>>>>>>>> assistance. With the increases, it lifted many just over a
>>>>>>>>>>> threshold where they didn't qualify for some anymore.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Welfare programs are *not* a subsidy to employers. They
>>>>>>>> *increase* the average wage that employers have to pay.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ah, yes - Republiturd math.  Never mind that most WalMart
>>>>>>> employees (among others) don't earn enough to make a living and
>>>>>>> have to go on Welfare.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's how it works for low-skilled / low-paid workers doing
>>>>>> non-career jobs in other countries.  Why should the USA be
>>>>>> different?  The major difference is they have to apply every month
>>>>>> by a certain date or lose their benefit for that month.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ============
>>>>>>> Walmart and McDonald?s are among the top employers of
>>>>>>> beneficiaries of federal aid programs like Medicaid and food
>>>>>>> stamps, according to a study by the nonpartisan Government
>>>>>>> Accountability Office released Wednesday. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/19/walmart-and-mcdonalds-among-top-
>>>>>>> employers-of-medicaid-and-food-stamp-beneficiaries.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ============
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If WalMart wages are so high, why are most of their employees
>>>>>>> getting food stamps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unskilled workers don't rate premium wages.  You got different
>>>>>> kinds of people working at Walmart.  Undependable kids whose
>>>>>> motivation doesn't enable them to do anything but operate a smart
>>>>>> phone.  Dependable kids working their way through college or trade
>>>>>> school, parents and retirees making ends meet with an extra job.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> An indirect subsidy is still a subsidy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The US has been subsidizing most of the planet at taxpayer expense
>>>>>> thanks to Democrats.  That era has ended.
>>>>>
>>>>> My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He
>>>>> doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car,
>>>>> pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still
>>>>> has money. I call bull.
>>>>
>>>> Is he still single?
>>>> Is he still living at home?
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>
>>> Doesn't matter.
>>>
>> 
>> “Doesn’t matter”?
>> 
>> I call bull.  Because there’s means tests.
>> Look it up, Walt.
>
>I've found similar results.  I know who I am.  It took several rolls of 
>the die to achieve the result I was looking at with strong feelings of 
>sharpened steel.  One whiff of that.  I'll tell you more when we were 
>further along.  Because Disney and stuff.  Nobody's better than anyone 
>else,  here.  Look what they do to you.  You must be joking if you think 
>you can opt out of the tests.  You will need it at some point in your 
>life or you haven't hit bottom yet.  I think we've all done that in the 
>2020s by now.

Trump whines like a homosexual.  And to think he claims he's never had it 
in the ass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36185

Skeeter OG wrote:
> In article <386740613.766608177.276769.recscuba_google-
> huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>>> In article <vtmb1r$29s$3@toxic.dizum.net>,
>>> tariffying@usa.org says...
>>>>
>>>> On 14 Apr 2025, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> posted some
>>>> news:vtki2v$2qctt$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> wrote in
>>>>> news:hAiLP.1811025$2zn8.541841@fx15.iad:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/13/2025 11:25 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
>>>>>>> Siri Cruz  <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/4/25 12:34, Think-It-Thru wrote:
>>>>>>>>> The employees would actually make out better with the lower wages
>>>>>>>>> because they qualified for various forms of public assistance.
>>>>>>>>> With the increases, it lifted many just over a threshold where they
>>>>>>>>> didn't qualify for some anymore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Welfare programs are *not* a subsidy to employers. They *increase* the
>>>>>> average wage that employers have to pay.
>>>>>
>>>>> ah, yes - Republiturd math.  Never mind that most WalMart employees
>>>>> (among others) don't earn enough to make a living and have to go on
>>>>> Welfare.
>>>>
>>>> That's how it works for low-skilled / low-paid workers doing non-career
>>>> jobs in other countries.  Why should the USA be different?  The major
>>>> difference is they have to apply every month by a certain date or lose
>>>> their benefit for that month.
>>>>
>>>>> ============
>>>>> Walmart and McDonald?s are among the top employers of beneficiaries of
>>>>> federal aid programs like Medicaid and food stamps, according to a study
>>>>> by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office released Wednesday.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/19/walmart-and-mcdonalds-among-top-
>>>>> employers-of-medicaid-and-food-stamp-beneficiaries.html
>>>>>
>>>>> ============
>>>>>
>>>>> If WalMart wages are so high, why are most of their employees getting
>>>>> food stamps?
>>>>
>>>> Unskilled workers don't rate premium wages.  You got different kinds of
>>>> people working at Walmart.  Undependable kids whose motivation doesn't
>>>> enable them to do anything but operate a smart phone.  Dependable kids
>>>> working their way through college or trade school, parents and retirees
>>>> making ends meet with an extra job.
>>>>
>>>>> An indirect subsidy is still a subsidy.
>>>>
>>>> The US has been subsidizing most of the planet at taxpayer expense thanks
>>>> to Democrats.  That era has ended.
>>>
>>> My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He
>>> doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car,
>>> pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still
>>> has money. I call bull.
>>
>> Is he still single?
>> Is he still living at home?
>>
>> -hh
> 
> Doesn't matter.
> 
Have you ever been this fucking ready before??  You hit that bell with 
your ten from the hammer.  Hello my name is Skeeter-Coward.  And I came 
down from the stars.
-- 
Know what I mean?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36179

On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:13:31 -0600, Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com>
wrote:

>
>My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He 
>doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car, 
>pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still 
>has money. I call bull.

Is he single?  Does he have kids?  Is the rent he pays a Fair Rent for
the area?  Does he pay utilities?  Buy his own groceries?

Or are you just spinning yet more lies?

-- 
MAGA doesn't understand that everybody is your friend.
They think everybody is your enemy.
It's a completely different way of thinking.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36187

Governor Swill wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:13:31 -0600, Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>
>> My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He
>> doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car,
>> pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still
>> has money. I call bull.
> 
> Is he single?  Does he have kids?  Is the rent he pays a Fair Rent for
> the area?  Does he pay utilities?  Buy his own groceries?
> 
> Or are you just spinning yet more lies?
> 
Responding to an urgent need for revenue and a trade imbalance with 
England that was fast destroying the infant American industries and 
draining the nation of its currency, the First United States Congress 
passed, and President George Washington signed, the Hamilton Tariff of 
1789, which authorized the collection of duties on imported goods. 
Customs duties as set by tariff rates up to 1860 were usually about 
80–95% of all federal revenue. Having just fought a war over taxation, 
among other things, the U.S. Congress wanted a reliable source of income 
that was relatively unobtrusive and easy to collect. It also sought to 
protect the infant industries that had developed during the war but 
which were now threatened by cheaper imports, especially from England.

The tariffs were 20-60% increase over the previous.  By comparison, 
Trump's tariffs were 25% increase.
-- 
Know what I mean?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36188

On 18/4/25 1:16, Mandrake the Perihelion wrote:
> Governor Swill wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:13:31 -0600, Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He
>>> doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car,
>>> pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still
>>> has money. I call bull.
>>
>> Is he single?  Does he have kids?  Is the rent he pays a Fair
>> Rent for
>> the area?  Does he pay utilities?  Buy his own groceries?
>>
>> Or are you just spinning yet more lies?
>>
> Responding to an urgent need for revenue and a trade imbalance
> with England that was fast destroying the infant American
> industries and draining the nation of its currency, the First
> United States Congress passed, and President George Washington
> signed, the Hamilton Tariff of 1789, which authorized the
> collection of duties on imported goods. Customs duties as set by
> tariff rates up to 1860 were usually about 80–95% of all federal
> revenue. Having just fought a war over taxation, among other
> things, the U.S. Congress wanted a reliable source of income that
> was relatively unobtrusive and easy to collect. It also sought to
> protect the infant industries that had developed during the war
> but which were now threatened by cheaper imports, especially from
> England.
>
> The tariffs were 20-60% increase over the previous.  By
> comparison, Trump's tariffs were 25% increase.

Compare the income from exports then and now. And compare the 
collected taxes on income then and now.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36189

Siri Cruz wrote:
> On 18/4/25 1:16, Mandrake the Perihelion wrote:
>> Governor Swill wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:13:31 -0600, Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He
>>>> doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car,
>>>> pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still
>>>> has money. I call bull.
>>>
>>> Is he single?  Does he have kids?  Is the rent he pays a Fair
>>> Rent for
>>> the area?  Does he pay utilities?  Buy his own groceries?
>>>
>>> Or are you just spinning yet more lies?
>>>
>> Responding to an urgent need for revenue and a trade imbalance
>> with England that was fast destroying the infant American
>> industries and draining the nation of its currency, the First
>> United States Congress passed, and President George Washington
>> signed, the Hamilton Tariff of 1789, which authorized the
>> collection of duties on imported goods. Customs duties as set by
>> tariff rates up to 1860 were usually about 80–95% of all federal
>> revenue. Having just fought a war over taxation, among other
>> things, the U.S. Congress wanted a reliable source of income that
>> was relatively unobtrusive and easy to collect. It also sought to
>> protect the infant industries that had developed during the war
>> but which were now threatened by cheaper imports, especially from
>> England.
>>
>> The tariffs were 20-60% increase over the previous.  By
>> comparison, Trump's tariffs were 25% increase.
> 
> Compare the income from exports then and now. And compare the collected 
> taxes on income then and now.
> 

Less : Many :: 0 : 50%

Bob was dumbfounded by Jay Opho-otto.  He demanded that there be a 
writing contest in which several chapt3r 7 bankers fill out the wrecking 
ball.  Tice.  What you say?  Hit the road Jc and don't you hijack no 
more.   In his training, he knew that it was time to interrogate the 
friends of the baby, yet all of it was behind a veil of superiority 
complex in a guy who wasn't motherfucking real.  He was not CATHOLIC
-- 
Know what I mean?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36194

>Siri Cruz wrote:
>> On 18/4/25 1:16, Mandrake the Perihelion wrote:
>>> Governor Swill wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:13:31 -0600, Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He
>>>>> doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car,
>>>>> pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still
>>>>> has money. I call bull.
>>>>
>>>> Is he single?  Does he have kids?  Is the rent he pays a Fair
>>>> Rent for
>>>> the area?  Does he pay utilities?  Buy his own groceries?
>>>>
>>>> Or are you just spinning yet more lies?
>>>>
>>> Responding to an urgent need for revenue and a trade imbalance
>>> with England that was fast destroying the infant American
>>> industries and draining the nation of its currency, the First
>>> United States Congress passed, and President George Washington
>>> signed, the Hamilton Tariff of 1789, which authorized the
>>> collection of duties on imported goods. Customs duties as set by
>>> tariff rates up to 1860 were usually about 80–95% of all federal
>>> revenue. Having just fought a war over taxation, among other
>>> things, the U.S. Congress wanted a reliable source of income that
>>> was relatively unobtrusive and easy to collect. It also sought to
>>> protect the infant industries that had developed during the war
>>> but which were now threatened by cheaper imports, especially from
>>> England.
>>>
>>> The tariffs were 20-60% increase over the previous.  By
>>> comparison, Trump's tariffs were 25% increase.
>> 
>> Compare the income from exports then and now. And compare the collected 
>> taxes on income then and now.
>> 
>
>Less : Many :: 0 : 50%
>
>Bob was dumbfounded by Jay Opho-otto.  He demanded that there be a 
>writing contest in which several chapt3r 7 bankers fill out the wrecking 
>ball.  Tice.  What you say?  Hit the road Jc and don't you hijack no 
>more.   In his training, he knew that it was time to interrogate the 
>friends of the baby, yet all of it was behind a veil of superiority 
>complex in a guy who wasn't motherfucking real.  He was not CATHOLIC

Trump whines like a homosexual.  And to think he claims he's never had it 
in the ass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36198

King wrote:
>> Siri Cruz wrote:
>>> On 18/4/25 1:16, Mandrake the Perihelion wrote:
>>>> Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:13:31 -0600, Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My son has worked for Walmart for a bit over 3 years. He
>>>>>> doesn't qualify for assistance. He bought his own car,
>>>>>> pays the payments and insurance and pays me rent and still
>>>>>> has money. I call bull.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is he single?  Does he have kids?  Is the rent he pays a Fair
>>>>> Rent for
>>>>> the area?  Does he pay utilities?  Buy his own groceries?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or are you just spinning yet more lies?
>>>>>
>>>> Responding to an urgent need for revenue and a trade imbalance
>>>> with England that was fast destroying the infant American
>>>> industries and draining the nation of its currency, the First
>>>> United States Congress passed, and President George Washington
>>>> signed, the Hamilton Tariff of 1789, which authorized the
>>>> collection of duties on imported goods. Customs duties as set by
>>>> tariff rates up to 1860 were usually about 80–95% of all federal
>>>> revenue. Having just fought a war over taxation, among other
>>>> things, the U.S. Congress wanted a reliable source of income that
>>>> was relatively unobtrusive and easy to collect. It also sought to
>>>> protect the infant industries that had developed during the war
>>>> but which were now threatened by cheaper imports, especially from
>>>> England.
>>>>
>>>> The tariffs were 20-60% increase over the previous.  By
>>>> comparison, Trump's tariffs were 25% increase.
>>>
>>> Compare the income from exports then and now. And compare the collected
>>> taxes on income then and now.
>>>
>>
>> Less : Many :: 0 : 50%
>>
>> Bob was dumbfounded by Jay Opho-otto.  He demanded that there be a
>> writing contest in which several chapt3r 7 bankers fill out the wrecking
>> ball.  Tice.  What you say?  Hit the road Jc and don't you hijack no
>> more.   In his training, he knew that it was time to interrogate the
>> friends of the baby, yet all of it was behind a veil of superiority
>> complex in a guy who wasn't motherfucking real.  He was not CATHOLIC
> 
> Trump whines like a homosexual.  And to think he claims he's never had it
> in the ass.
> 
Newsgroups liberated.  Whiners like you never claim like he's it in ass had.

-- 
Oh, I am for you, you can enjoy
I can give you
It's a time you love to hate
give me, give me, give me

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36171

Tariffying <tariffying@usa.org> wrote in
news:vtmb1r$29s$3@toxic.dizum.net: 


> 
> The US has been subsidizing most of the planet at taxpayer expense
> thanks to Democrats.  That era has ended.


    Yes, it is time for America to stop
spreading influence and creating markets
in the third. Let China and Russia and
Saudi Arabia spread their influence 
instead. What could go wrong?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36172

Mitchell Holman wrote:
> Tariffying <tariffying@usa.org> wrote in
> news:vtmb1r$29s$3@toxic.dizum.net:
> 
> 
>>
>> The US has been subsidizing most of the planet at taxpayer expense
>> thanks to Democrats.  That era has ended.
> 
> 
>      Yes, it is time for America to stop
> spreading influence and creating markets
> in the third. Let China and Russia and
> Saudi Arabia spread their influence
> instead. What could go wrong?
> 
> 
> 
You feed it once and then it stays.
-- 
"It will be a long
And difficult war
It will be conducted
On many fronts
But as long as it takes
We will prevail
Across the world governments
Have heard this message
You're either with us or you're with the terrorists
Tyranny
Terror
& Lawless Violence"
    -- George W. Bush

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36164

Lou Bricano  <lb@cap.con> wrote:
>In most places in the U.S., the minimum wage is no issue because the average 
>*market-determined* wage is higher than the minimum. 

Well, I would hope so.  I would expect the average to be a WHOLE LOT higher
than the minimum.  The minimum wage is not a baseline, it is a bare minimum.
--scott

-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36154

On 4/12/2025 7:51 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
> On 12/4/25 12:34, Think-It-Thru wrote:
>> The employees would actually make out better with the lower wages
>> because they qualified for various forms of public assistance.  With
>> the increases, it lifted many just over a threshold where they didn't
>> qualify for some anymore.
> 
> That is the reason for minimum wage: to make all salaries high enough no 
> business gets the government to help pay.
That is *not* the reason for minimum wage. The reason for minimum wage laws is 
to make skilled, often unionized, labor comparatively cheaper.

Say a skilled unionized worker is twice as productive as two unskilled teens, 
and the union member earns $35 per hour. Minimum wage is $15 per hour. You hire 
the two teens and get the same output as you would get from the union member, 
but you're only paying $30 per hour for their output. So you hire the teens. Now 
the government mandates an increase to the minimum wage to $20 an hour. The two 
teens now cost you $40 per hour for the same output you can get from the union 
member for only $35. You fire the teens and hire the union member.

The *strongest* supporters of increases to the minimum wage are *always* labor 
unions. Dummies think organized labor supports minimum wage increases because 
there is some kind of ratchet effect that increases union wages as well, but 
that's wrong. The reason is that increases in minimum wage reduce the demand for 
low-skilled non-union labor and increase the demand for unionized labor. That's 
the reason.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36141

On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 19:34:12 +0000, Think-It-Thru <dems@dont.org>
wrote:

>
>Fast food isn't a career job.
>
>The employees would actually make out better with the lower wages 
>because they qualified for various forms of public assistance.  With
>the increases, it lifted many just over a threshold where they didn't
>qualify for some anymore.  
>
>There's plenty of jobs out there where families can't make ends meet 
>without some sort of help.  It's that way in every country.

You boys just keep trying new ways to keep the poor down and non
whites out of the loop.

Low wages aren't better for anybody, anywhere.
--
America first does not mean America only.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36143

Governor Swill wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 19:34:12 +0000, Think-It-Thru <dems@dont.org>
> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Fast food isn't a career job.
>>
>> The employees would actually make out better with the lower wages
>> because they qualified for various forms of public assistance.  With
>> the increases, it lifted many just over a threshold where they didn't
>> qualify for some anymore.
>>
>> There's plenty of jobs out there where families can't make ends meet
>> without some sort of help.  It's that way in every country.
> 
> You boys just keep trying new ways to keep the poor down and non
> whites out of the loop.

DEI is supposed to help women too.  If it's not then there's something 
wrong with the program.  Now I have a vision of fat Indian men sitting 
in the Presidential cabinet.
-- 
What can I say to have you at es?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36157

On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 02:07:56 -0500, Mandrake the Perihelion
<jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote:

>DEI is supposed to help women too.  If it's not then there's something 
>wrong with the program.  Now I have a vision of fat Indian men sitting 
>in the Presidential cabinet.

That might be an improvement.

--
America first does not mean America only.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36142

On 12/4/25 12:34, Think-It-Thru wrote:
> The employees would actually make out better with the lower wages
> because they qualified for various forms of public assistance.  With
> the increases, it lifted many just over a threshold where they didn't
> qualify for some anymore.

That is the reason for minimum wage: to make all salaries high 
enough no business gets the government to help pay.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | talk.bizarre

csiph-web