Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > talk.bizarre > #36086 > unrolled thread

Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL!

Back to article view | Back to talk.bizarre

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! .../v]andrak|≡... <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 07:40 -0500
    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-08 13:19 +0000
      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-09 03:21 +0000
        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-09 03:26 +0000
          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-09 14:46 +0000
            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-09 10:37 -0600
              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-10 00:39 +0000
                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-09 20:57 -0600
            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Brandon Dickenbacher <bdickenbacher@maga2028.com> - 2025-04-09 21:08 +0000
              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-09 22:29 +0000
                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-04-09 19:33 -0400
                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-09 23:40 +0000
                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-09 19:51 -0700
                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:07 -0400
                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-04-11 08:44 -0400
                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 06:45 -0400
                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! usa 1st <nobody@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 04:25 +0000
                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 23:39 -0500
                            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Think-It-Thru <dems@dont.org> - 2025-04-12 19:34 +0000
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 12:55 -0700
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-12 19:51 -0700
                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-04-13 14:25 -0400
                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-04-14 23:59 +0000
                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> - 2025-04-14 18:25 -0700
                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-15 02:59 +0000
                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Klaus  Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> - 2025-04-15 04:03 -0700
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-04-15 08:53 -0400
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-15 06:58 -0700
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Klaus  Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> - 2025-04-15 08:57 -0700
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-16 08:29 -0400
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-15 15:11 +0000
                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-15 05:37 -0600
                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Tariffying <tariffying@usa.org> - 2025-04-15 19:11 +0000
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-15 15:13 -0600
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-17 13:43 -0500
                                            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-17 13:43 -0600
                                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-17 18:20 -0500
                                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-17 17:45 -0600
                                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 22:12 -0400
                                                    Trump branded citienship experiences Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 01:32 -0400
                                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 03:14 -0500
                                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-18 04:38 -0700
                                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! King <x@y.com> - 2025-04-19 00:38 +0000
                                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 03:12 -0500
                                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! King <x@y.com> - 2025-04-19 00:37 +0000
                                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 03:13 -0500
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 15:51 -0400
                                            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 03:16 -0500
                                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-18 04:10 -0700
                                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 06:18 -0500
                                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! King <x@y.com> - 2025-04-19 00:38 +0000
                                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Praetor Mandrak <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-20 14:18 -0500
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-16 02:07 +0000
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-16 00:18 -0500
                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-04-15 08:50 -0400
                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> - 2025-04-13 11:54 -0700
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 23:38 -0400
                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 02:07 -0500
                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-14 03:12 -0400
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-12 22:14 -0700
                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 02:16 -0500
                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-14 03:14 -0400
                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 23:36 -0400
                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Brandon Dickenbacher <bdickenbacher@maga2028.com> - 2025-04-10 04:25 +0000
                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-09 21:50 -0700
                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:21 -0400
                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-10 21:16 -0700
                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 06:45 -0400
                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-10 13:31 +0000
                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-10 08:09 -0600
                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-04-10 15:06 -0400
                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-10 12:31 -0700
                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-12 05:33 -0400
                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-12 09:30 -0700
                            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-12 18:35 +0000
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Harry Bristol <hbristol@redchecks.com> - 2025-04-12 23:18 +0000
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-12 17:00 -0700
                            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Harry Bristol <hbristol@redchecks.com> - 2025-04-12 23:14 +0000
                              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-13 01:36 +0000
                                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-13 05:57 -0600
                                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 07:45 -0500
                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-13 07:20 -0600
                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 09:43 -0500
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 07:45 -0700
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 10:24 -0500
                                    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 06:38 -0700
                                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 09:45 -0500
                                        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! J. Carter <jcarter@dont-email.me> - 2025-04-14 03:05 +0200
                                          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mandrake the Perihelion <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 20:16 -0500
                      Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:22 -0400
                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-04-09 19:48 -0700
                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:25 -0400
        Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-09 06:51 -0600
          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> - 2025-04-09 15:04 +0000
            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-09 10:37 -0600
            Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-09 18:03 +0000
              Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Brandon Dickenbacher <bdickenbacher@maga2028.com> - 2025-04-10 04:07 +0000
                Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2025-04-10 13:27 +0000
                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> - 2025-04-10 08:08 -0600
                  Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 23:28 -0400
          Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Roderick <adrastea2050@live.com> - 2025-04-10 00:38 +0200
    Re: Stock market grifters taking it up the ass: LOL! Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 02:08 -0400

Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6  Next page →

#36144

Siri Cruz wrote:
> On 12/4/25 12:34, Think-It-Thru wrote:
>> The employees would actually make out better with the lower wages
>> because they qualified for various forms of public assistance.  With
>> the increases, it lifted many just over a threshold where they didn't
>> qualify for some anymore.
> 
> That is the reason for minimum wage: to make all salaries high enough no 
> business gets the government to help pay.
> 
That's probably the reason for the inflation then.  Joseph Biden 
increased the minimum wages a bit during his term.  With everybody 
getting more money, money is devalued.  This is synonymous with 
inflation.  At least this has it pegged.  I was worried there was 
something sinister going on.
-- 
What can I say to have you at es?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36158

On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 02:16:46 -0500, Mandrake the Perihelion
<jfwaldby@gmail.com> wrote:

>Siri Cruz wrote:
>> On 12/4/25 12:34, Think-It-Thru wrote:
>>> The employees would actually make out better with the lower wages
>>> because they qualified for various forms of public assistance.  With
>>> the increases, it lifted many just over a threshold where they didn't
>>> qualify for some anymore.
>> 
>> That is the reason for minimum wage: to make all salaries high enough no 
>> business gets the government to help pay.
>> 
>That's probably the reason for the inflation then.  Joseph Biden 
>increased the minimum wages a bit during his term.  With everybody 
>getting more money, money is devalued.  This is synonymous with 
>inflation.  At least this has it pegged.  I was worried there was 
>something sinister going on.

The reason for the 2021-22 inflation was that Trump dumped four
trillion dollars into a 23T economy and Biden dropped another 2T all
in less than a year.

If you didn't want the inflation, you shouldn't have cashed the check.
--
America first does not mean America only.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36140

On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 04:25:34 -0000 (UTC), usa 1st <nobody@gmail.com>
wrote:

>No they were not.  The USA has been bearing the cost of funding for
>those agreements for decades and getting nothing but insults and
>increased funding disbursement requests in return. 

Yet we're still the richest nation on earth.

NP:  John Denver - Country Roads
--
America first does not mean America only.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36109

On 09 Apr 2025, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) posted some 
news:vt704i$7vo$1@panix2.panix.com:

> pothead  <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>
>>Republicans do not support globalism, at least most of them don't.
>>Democrats love globalism.
> 
> Globalization is the result of a technological advancement.  Container
> ships and automated loading and unloading make it incredibly cheap now
> to ship merchandise around the world.

Globalization is an attempt to own and control all facets of goods 
production.  
 
> You can support it or not support it, it doesn't matter because it's not
> going to go away.  Attempts to reverse or advance technological change 
> by legislation are futile.
> --scott

One good war will change that.  We are not all friends.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36110

On 9/4/25 21:25, Brandon Dickenbacher wrote:
>> pothead<pothead@snakebite.com>  wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>Republicans do not support globalism, at least most of them don't.
>>> >>Democrats love globalism.
>> >
>> >Globalization is the result of a technological advancement.  Container
>> >ships and automated loading and unloading make it incredibly cheap now
>> >to ship merchandise around the world.
> Globalization is an attempt to own and control all facets of goods
> production.
>

You clowns are so stupid it is ridiculous. You look so silly 
trying to pound in pitons as you slide down the Matterhorn.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36118

On Wed, 09 Apr 2025 21:50:41 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>On 9/4/25 21:25, Brandon Dickenbacher wrote:
>>> pothead<pothead@snakebite.com>  wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Republicans do not support globalism, at least most of them don't.
>>>> >>Democrats love globalism.
>>> >
>>> >Globalization is the result of a technological advancement.  Container
>>> >ships and automated loading and unloading make it incredibly cheap now
>>> >to ship merchandise around the world.
>> Globalization is an attempt to own and control all facets of goods
>> production.

You IDIOT!  It does the very opposite.  The more people and places you
have involved in a given production, the more diverse control is.
THAT'S the point.

You don't want all your cars produced in three or six countries.  You
want it spread around.  Fifty, no, seventy countries with can
factories.

How is anybody going to lock control of the auto industry given that?

>You clowns are so stupid it is ridiculous. You look so silly 
>trying to pound in pitons as you slide down the Matterhorn.

I firmly believe that they think like they do because they simply
don't understand the system.

You can get a bigger piece of the pie, or you can get a bigger pie.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36122

On 10/4/25 20:21, Governor Swill wrote:
> You IDIOT!  It does the very opposite.  The more people and places you
> have involved in a given production, the more diverse control is.
> THAT'S the point.
>
> You don't want all your cars produced in three or six countries.  You
> want it spread around.  Fifty, no, seventy countries with can
> factories.
>
> How is anybody going to lock control of the auto industry given that?
>
>> >You clowns are so stupid it is ridiculous. You look so silly
>> >trying to pound in pitons as you slide down the Matterhorn.
> I firmly believe that they think like they do because they simply
> don't understand the system.
>
> You can get a bigger piece of the pie, or you can get a bigger pie.

There is a term 'zero sum game' which means any player's profit 
is another's loss, and vice versa. The Insane Oranger sees all 
economic activity as such.

In the real world, diverse parties can combine their capital and 
talents that trap ever more energy in structures that benefit the 
participants and the entire society.

idjt declares that wind generators generate electricity at the 
expense of an equally degraded landscape and causing cancer. The 
reality is people cooperate to erect generators that have far 
lesser environmental impact than coal burners and share their 
electricity with customers in Texas, California, Holland, and 
elsewhere.

I do not ignore global markets have hurt some people. But I feel 
the increased profits can be used by governments for amelioration.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36129

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 21:16:29 -0700, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>On 10/4/25 20:21, Governor Swill wrote:
>> You IDIOT!  It does the very opposite.  The more people and places you
>> have involved in a given production, the more diverse control is.
>> THAT'S the point.
>>
>> You don't want all your cars produced in three or six countries.  You
>> want it spread around.  Fifty, no, seventy countries with can
>> factories.
>>
>> How is anybody going to lock control of the auto industry given that?
>>
>>> >You clowns are so stupid it is ridiculous. You look so silly
>>> >trying to pound in pitons as you slide down the Matterhorn.
>> I firmly believe that they think like they do because they simply
>> don't understand the system.

That must be it.  The US and our allies, "The West" have worked
mightily to achieve non-zero sum games.  Games in which everybody can
benefit.

>> You can get a bigger piece of the pie, or you can get a bigger pie.
>
>There is a term 'zero sum game' which means any player's profit 
>is another's loss, and vice versa. The Insane Oranger sees all 
>economic activity as such.

The US and our allies, "The West" have worked mightily to achieve
non-zero sum games.  Games in which everybody can benefit.

>In the real world, diverse parties can combine their capital and 
>talents that trap ever more energy in structures that benefit the 
>participants and the entire society.

They can? /s

NP:  Billy Ocean - Get Outta My Dreams, Get Into My Car
--
America first does not mean America only.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36112

Brandon Dickenbacher <bdickenbacher@maga2028.com> wrote in news:vt7h76$bhb
$15@toxic.dizum.net:

> On 09 Apr 2025, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) posted some 
> news:vt704i$7vo$1@panix2.panix.com:
> 
>> pothead  <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Republicans do not support globalism, at least most of them don't.
>>>Democrats love globalism.
>> 
>> Globalization is the result of a technological advancement.  Container
>> ships and automated loading and unloading make it incredibly cheap now
>> to ship merchandise around the world.
> 
> Globalization is an attempt to own and control all facets of goods 
> production.  
>  

  
    Conservatives love globalization when it
crushes unions and increases profits. Why do
you think they are all in a rush to ship their
manufacturing overseas?



>> You can support it or not support it, it doesn't matter because it's not
>> going to go away.  Attempts to reverse or advance technological change 
>> by legislation are futile.
>> --scott
> 
> One good war will change that.  We are not all friends.


     Good wars like Iraq and Afghanistan. 

     What did we get out of those, again?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36114

In article <XnsB2BD571874737629555@185.151.15.160>, 
noemail@aol.com says...
> 
> Brandon Dickenbacher <bdickenbacher@maga2028.com> wrote in news:vt7h76$bhb
> $15@toxic.dizum.net:
> 
> > On 09 Apr 2025, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) posted some 
> > news:vt704i$7vo$1@panix2.panix.com:
> > 
> >> pothead  <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Republicans do not support globalism, at least most of them don't.
> >>>Democrats love globalism.
> >> 
> >> Globalization is the result of a technological advancement.  Container
> >> ships and automated loading and unloading make it incredibly cheap now
> >> to ship merchandise around the world.
> > 
> > Globalization is an attempt to own and control all facets of goods 
> > production.  
> >  
> 
>   
>     Conservatives love globalization when it
> crushes unions and increases profits. Why do
> you think they are all in a rush to ship their
> manufacturing overseas?
> 
> 
> 
> >> You can support it or not support it, it doesn't matter because it's not
> >> going to go away.  Attempts to reverse or advance technological change 
> >> by legislation are futile.
> >> --scott
> > 
> > One good war will change that.  We are not all friends.
> 
> 
>      Good wars like Iraq and Afghanistan. 
> 
>      What did we get out of those, again?

13 people killed and 80 billion of equipment left behind.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36115

On 4/10/25 10:09, Skeeter OG wrote:
> In article <XnsB2BD571874737629555@185.151.15.160>,
> noemail@aol.com says...
>>
>> Brandon Dickenbacher <bdickenbacher@maga2028.com> wrote in news:vt7h76$bhb
>> $15@toxic.dizum.net:
>>
>>> On 09 Apr 2025, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) posted some
>>> news:vt704i$7vo$1@panix2.panix.com:
>>>
>>>> pothead  <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Republicans do not support globalism, at least most of them don't.
>>>>> Democrats love globalism.
>>>>
>>>> Globalization is the result of a technological advancement.  Container
>>>> ships and automated loading and unloading make it incredibly cheap now
>>>> to ship merchandise around the world.
>>>
>>> Globalization is an attempt to own and control all facets of goods
>>> production.
>>>   
>>
>>    
>>      Conservatives love globalization when it
>> crushes unions and increases profits. Why do
>> you think they are all in a rush to ship their
>> manufacturing overseas?
>>
>>
>>
>>>> You can support it or not support it, it doesn't matter because it's not
>>>> going to go away.  Attempts to reverse or advance technological change
>>>> by legislation are futile.
>>>> --scott
>>>
>>> One good war will change that.  We are not all friends.
>>
>>
>>       Good wars like Iraq and Afghanistan.
>>
>>       What did we get out of those, again?
> 
> 13 people killed and 80 billion of equipment left behind.

Incorrect:  64 killed ... and $80B worth of gear transferred away 
because transport & airlift had been constrained since 2018.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36116

On 10/4/25 6:31, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>      Conservatives love globalization when it
> crushes unions and increases profits. Why do
> you think they are all in a rush to ship their
> manufacturing overseas?
>

Nearly free markets are the best way to allocate resources and 
promote free enterprise. This why Reagan pushed it.

His failure is truly free markets are self destructive and damage 
society. We want nearly free with a light hand on the tiller.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36127

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:31:16 -0700, Siri Cruz wrote:

>On 10/4/25 6:31, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>      Conservatives love globalization when it
>> crushes unions and increases profits. Why do
>> you think they are all in a rush to ship their
>> manufacturing overseas?
>>
>
>Nearly free markets are the best way to allocate resources and 
>promote free enterprise. This why Reagan pushed it.
>
>His failure is truly free markets are self destructive and damage 
>society. We want nearly free with a light hand on the tiller.

"Light" is relative.

--
America first does not mean America only.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36130

On 12/4/25 2:33, Governor Swill wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:31:16 -0700, Siri Cruz wrote:
>
>> On 10/4/25 6:31, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>       Conservatives love globalization when it
>>> crushes unions and increases profits. Why do
>>> you think they are all in a rush to ship their
>>> manufacturing overseas?
>>>
>>
>> Nearly free markets are the best way to allocate resources and
>> promote free enterprise. This why Reagan pushed it.
>>
>> His failure is truly free markets are self destructive and damage
>> society. We want nearly free with a light hand on the tiller.
>
> "Light" is relative.

Yes. And when smart people are in charge, it is dynamic.

When I was learning about airplanes, one of the design principles 
was dynamic stability. Planes are designed to fly straight and 
level until they run out of fuel. Winds that start a yaw or roll 
or pitch change the flight surfaces orient to create a matching 
counterforce. The remaining question is how stable. You want the 
pilot able to overcome the flight surfaces and move the plane 
where they want it to go.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36131

Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in news:vte4f8$smub$4@dont-email.me:

> On 12/4/25 2:33, Governor Swill wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:31:16 -0700, Siri Cruz wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/4/25 6:31, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>       Conservatives love globalization when it
>>>> crushes unions and increases profits. Why do
>>>> you think they are all in a rush to ship their
>>>> manufacturing overseas?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nearly free markets are the best way to allocate resources and
>>> promote free enterprise. This why Reagan pushed it.
>>>
>>> His failure is truly free markets are self destructive and damage
>>> society. We want nearly free with a light hand on the tiller.
>>
>> "Light" is relative.
> 
> Yes. And when smart people are in charge, it is dynamic.
> 
> When I was learning about airplanes, one of the design principles 
> was dynamic stability. Planes are designed to fly straight and 
> level until they run out of fuel. Winds that start a yaw or roll 
> or pitch change the flight surfaces orient to create a matching 
> counterforce. The remaining question is how stable. You want the 
> pilot able to overcome the flight surfaces and move the plane 
> where they want it to go.
> 


   An airplane without power becomes a glider.

   A helicopter without power becomes a brick.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36136

On 12 Apr 2025, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> posted some
news:XnsB2BF8AC8B4EA1629555@185.151.15.190: 

> Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:vte4f8$smub$4@dont-email.me: 
> 
>> On 12/4/25 2:33, Governor Swill wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:31:16 -0700, Siri Cruz wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/4/25 6:31, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>       Conservatives love globalization when it
>>>>> crushes unions and increases profits. Why do
>>>>> you think they are all in a rush to ship their
>>>>> manufacturing overseas?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nearly free markets are the best way to allocate resources and
>>>> promote free enterprise. This why Reagan pushed it.
>>>>
>>>> His failure is truly free markets are self destructive and damage
>>>> society. We want nearly free with a light hand on the tiller.
>>>
>>> "Light" is relative.
>> 
>> Yes. And when smart people are in charge, it is dynamic.
>> 
>> When I was learning about airplanes, one of the design principles 
>> was dynamic stability. Planes are designed to fly straight and 
>> level until they run out of fuel. Winds that start a yaw or roll 
>> or pitch change the flight surfaces orient to create a matching 
>> counterforce. The remaining question is how stable. You want the 
>> pilot able to overcome the flight surfaces and move the plane 
>> where they want it to go.
> 
>    An airplane without power becomes a glider.
> 
>    A helicopter without power becomes a brick.

A DEI lesbian helicopter pilot flies directly into jets and kills 70 
people.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36137

On 12/4/25 11:35, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>     A helicopter without power becomes a brick.

It becomes a feather. The rotor freely rotates and so acts as 
parachutes, in what is called autorotation. It gently descends to 
a controlled landing.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-999. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 4.0        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36135

On 12 Apr 2025, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some 
news:vte4f8$smub$4@dont-email.me:

> On 12/4/25 2:33, Governor Swill wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:31:16 -0700, Siri Cruz wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/4/25 6:31, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>       Conservatives love globalization when it
>>>> crushes unions and increases profits. Why do
>>>> you think they are all in a rush to ship their
>>>> manufacturing overseas?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nearly free markets are the best way to allocate resources and
>>> promote free enterprise. This why Reagan pushed it.
>>>
>>> His failure is truly free markets are self destructive and damage
>>> society. We want nearly free with a light hand on the tiller.
>>
>> "Light" is relative.
> 
> Yes. And when smart people are in charge, it is dynamic.

That's why we put Trump in charge.  Because when he speaks, liberals 
listen.  They get it wrong in almost every case and then lie to cover up 
their miscues.

> When I was learning about airplanes, one of the design principles 
> was dynamic stability. Planes are designed to fly straight and 
> level until they run out of fuel. Winds that start a yaw or roll 
> or pitch change the flight surfaces orient to create a matching 
> counterforce. The remaining question is how stable. You want the 
> pilot able to overcome the flight surfaces and move the plane 
> where they want it to go.

Does the same principle apply to helicopters?  You know, like the one 
flown by the lesbian DEI pilot in DC that crashed into the jet.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36138

Harry Bristol <hbristol@redchecks.com> wrote in news:vtes56$g7ou$5
@news.mixmin.net:

> On 12 Apr 2025, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some 
> news:vte4f8$smub$4@dont-email.me:
> 
>> On 12/4/25 2:33, Governor Swill wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:31:16 -0700, Siri Cruz wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/4/25 6:31, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>       Conservatives love globalization when it
>>>>> crushes unions and increases profits. Why do
>>>>> you think they are all in a rush to ship their
>>>>> manufacturing overseas?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nearly free markets are the best way to allocate resources and
>>>> promote free enterprise. This why Reagan pushed it.
>>>>
>>>> His failure is truly free markets are self destructive and damage
>>>> society. We want nearly free with a light hand on the tiller.
>>>
>>> "Light" is relative.
>> 
>> Yes. And when smart people are in charge, it is dynamic.
> 
> That's why we put Trump in charge.  Because when he speaks, liberals 
> listen. 


  Indeed. 

  No one else utters as many stupid gaffes
as Trump. Electric boats, Hannibal Lector,
Haitians eating dogs, for and against Tesla,
for and against Tiktok, for and against 
teleprompters, for and against tariffs, even
his own staff can't work with him. 

  "I didn't say he is an idiot, 
I said he is a fucking idiot"
- Rex Tillerson, Trumps Sec of State

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#36145

In article <XnsB2BFD206F2FF9629555@185.151.15.190>, 
noemail@aol.com says...
> 
> Harry Bristol <hbristol@redchecks.com> wrote in news:vtes56$g7ou$5
> @news.mixmin.net:
> 
> > On 12 Apr 2025, Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some 
> > news:vte4f8$smub$4@dont-email.me:
> > 
> >> On 12/4/25 2:33, Governor Swill wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:31:16 -0700, Siri Cruz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 10/4/25 6:31, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>>       Conservatives love globalization when it
> >>>>> crushes unions and increases profits. Why do
> >>>>> you think they are all in a rush to ship their
> >>>>> manufacturing overseas?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Nearly free markets are the best way to allocate resources and
> >>>> promote free enterprise. This why Reagan pushed it.
> >>>>
> >>>> His failure is truly free markets are self destructive and damage
> >>>> society. We want nearly free with a light hand on the tiller.
> >>>
> >>> "Light" is relative.
> >> 
> >> Yes. And when smart people are in charge, it is dynamic.
> > 
> > That's why we put Trump in charge.  Because when he speaks, liberals 
> > listen. 
> 
> 
>   Indeed. 
> 
>   No one else utters as many stupid gaffes
> as Trump. Electric boats, Hannibal Lector,
> Haitians eating dogs, for and against Tesla,
> for and against Tiktok, for and against 
> teleprompters, for and against tariffs, even
> his own staff can't work with him. 
> 
"you know the thing"

Joe Biden

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | talk.bizarre

csiph-web