Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.space.policy > #69153 > unrolled thread
| Started by | E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-06-24 05:26 +0000 |
| Last post | 2026-06-24 07:33 +0000 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.space.policy
Non Newtonian Propulsion E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-24 05:26 +0000
Re: Non Newtonian Propulsion Rufus <ru@ru.ru> - 2026-06-23 23:58 -0700
Re: Non Newtonian Propulsion Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> - 2026-06-24 00:10 -0700
Re: Non Newtonian Propulsion E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-24 10:32 +0000
Re: Non Newtonian Propulsion Lord Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> - 2026-06-24 07:33 +0000
| From | E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-24 05:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Non Newtonian Propulsion |
| Message-ID | <1782278792-2039@newsgrouper.org> |
https://srcpublishers.com/physics-optics-sciences-jpsos/article/view/1547/1624
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rufus <ru@ru.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-23 23:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b7um3lh3voff5h2j94asop3rh9k4s49as7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #69153 |
E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote: > https://srcpublishers.com/physics-optics-sciences-jpsos/article/view/1547/1624 A few suggestions for next time: Submit to a peer-review process. Your document is 3 years old. Has the product not advanced at all since then? Spend less time talking about how unsuitable rockets are, and more time on technical details of how your PNN Drive works (or doesn't work). Vacuum (free space) does not have zero dielectric permitivity constant, nor zero magnetic permeability constant. Your claim otherwise is a blunder that would embarrass a first-year college physics student. Thrust is a force. Grams are an SI unit of mass, not force. The SI unit of force is newtons (MKS) or dynes (CGS). Don't use Google Translate to translate your work from Italian. Get an english-fluent translator to compose the english version. Don't use the paper as a for-sale ad for your prototype. Don't use photocopies of charcoal-pencil drawings in a scientific paper. Need readable drawings -- find someone who knows AutoCAD, or at least Windows Paint. Provide enlarged copies. Take photos in a real lab, not in your mother's broom closet. YWIA, and I hope your next paper will be more enlightening and more convincing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-24 00:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <lf0n3lla2gl8e6pk3k571lrhu0mirdvm3c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #69155 |
Rufus <ru@ru.ru> wrote: > E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote: > > > https://srcpublishers.com/physics-optics-sciences-jpsos/article/view/1547/1624 Lol. What a riot. > > A few suggestions for next time: > > Submit to a peer-review process. > > Your document is 3 years old. Has the product not advanced at > all since then? > > Spend less time talking about how unsuitable rockets are, and > more time on technical details of how your PNN Drive works (or > doesn't work). > > Vacuum (free space) does not have zero dielectric permitivity > constant, nor zero magnetic permeability constant. Your claim > otherwise is a blunder that would embarrass a first-year > college physics student. > > Thrust is a force. Grams are an SI unit of mass, not force. > The SI unit of force is newtons (MKS) or dynes (CGS). > > Don't use Google Translate to translate your work from > Italian. Get an english-fluent translator to compose the > english version. > > Don't use the paper as a for-sale ad for your prototype. > > Don't use photocopies of charcoal-pencil drawings in a > scientific paper. Need readable drawings -- find someone who > knows AutoCAD, or at least Windows Paint. Provide enlarged > copies. > > Take photos in a real lab, not in your mother's broom closet. > > > > YWIA, and I hope your next paper will be more enlightening and > more convincing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-24 10:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1782297159-2039@newsgrouper.org> |
| In reply to | #69156 |
Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> posted: > Rufus <ru@ru.ru> wrote: > > > E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote: > > > > > https://srcpublishers.com/physics-optics-sciences-jpsos/article/view/1547/1624 > > Lol. What a riot. > > Divertiti con i comici razzi di Musk :-) i.e. ciarle e zero colonizzazioni dal 1969 > > > > > A few suggestions for next time: > > > > Submit to a peer-review process. > > > > Your document is 3 years old. Has the product not advanced at > > all since then? Mi hanno chiesto loro un articolo e l'uscita l'ho saputa da Research Gate Non avrete Aliena che può raggiungere Marte in 4 giorn a costi molto bassi. Tenetevi gli idioti Bezos & Musk :-) Do you want reach Mars without Musk comic ciarle + failures? Follow us https://propulsion-revolution.com/subspace very low costs using submarines http://www.asps.it/nebila12.jpg > > > > Spend less time talking about how unsuitable rockets are, and > > more time on technical details of how your PNN Drive works (or > > doesn't work). > > > > Vacuum (free space) does not have zero dielectric permitivity > > constant, nor zero magnetic permeability constant. Your claim > > otherwise is a blunder that would embarrass a first-year > > college physics student. > > > > Thrust is a force. Grams are an SI unit of mass, not force. > > The SI unit of force is newtons (MKS) or dynes (CGS). > > > > Don't use Google Translate to translate your work from > > Italian. Get an english-fluent translator to compose the > > english version. > > > > Don't use the paper as a for-sale ad for your prototype. > > > > Don't use photocopies of charcoal-pencil drawings in a > > scientific paper. Need readable drawings -- find someone who > > knows AutoCAD, or at least Windows Paint. Provide enlarged > > copies. > > > > Take photos in a real lab, not in your mother's broom closet. > > > > > > > > YWIA, and I hope your next paper will be more enlightening and > > more convincing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lord Ottone <vonottone@pnn.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-24 07:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <111g180$2lggn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #69155 |
On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 23:58:41 -0700, Rufus wrote: > E.Laureti <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote: > >> https://srcpublishers.com/physics-optics-sciences-jpsos/article/view/ 1547/1624 > > > > A few suggestions for next time: > > Submit to a peer-review process. > > Your document is 3 years old. Has the product not advanced at all since > then? > > Spend less time talking about how unsuitable rockets are, and more time > on technical details of how your PNN Drive works (or doesn't work). > > Vacuum (free space) does not have zero dielectric permitivity constant, > nor zero magnetic permeability constant. Your claim otherwise is a > blunder that would embarrass a first-year college physics student. > > Thrust is a force. Grams are an SI unit of mass, not force. The SI unit > of force is newtons (MKS) or dynes (CGS). > > Don't use Google Translate to translate your work from Italian. Get an > english-fluent translator to compose the english version. > > Don't use the paper as a for-sale ad for your prototype. > > Don't use photocopies of charcoal-pencil drawings in a scientific paper. > Need readable drawings -- find someone who knows AutoCAD, or at least > Windows Paint. Provide enlarged copies. > > Take photos in a real lab, not in your mother's broom closet. > > > > YWIA, and I hope your next paper will be more enlightening and more > convincing. Imbecile!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.space.policy
csiph-web