Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #520556 > unrolled thread

Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar 3 )

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: 9/11 was an inside job.  (directed to Sar 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:43 -0500
    Re: 9/11 was an inside job.  (directed to Sar 3 ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:23 -0400
      Re: 9/11 was an inside job.  (directed to Sar 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:41 -0500
        Re: 9/11 was an inside job.  (directed to Sar 3 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:36 -0400
          Re: 9/11 was an inside job.  (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:11 -0500
            Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 13:01 +0100
              Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 07:05 -0500
                Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 15:55 +0100
                  Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 10:03 -0500
                    Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 16:49 +0100
                      Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 10:51 -0500
                        Re: Rocky nuts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 16:10 +0000
                        Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 20:38 +0100
                          Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:41 -0500
                            Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:22 -0500
                            Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 19:24 +0100
                      Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:59 -0700
                    Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Roger is caught lying. Yes, again) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:47 -0500
                    Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 20:40 +0100
                      Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:44 -0500
                        Re: Rocky still nuts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:48 +0000
                          Re: Rocky still nuts Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:49 -0400
                            Re: Rocky still nuts gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 10:25 -0500
                        Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:44 -0400
                          Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:23 -0500
                            Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:31 -0400
                              Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 07:56 -0700
                              Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:38 -0500
                              Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 08:53 -0500
                                Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:00 -0500
                        Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:23 -0500
                        Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 19:51 +0100
                          Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:05 -0500
                    Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:27 -0400
                      Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 15:16 -0500
                        Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:12 -0500
            Re: 9/11 was an inside job.  (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 16:22 -0400
              Re: 9/11 was an inside job.  (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:25 -0500
                Re: Rocky still raving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:50 +0000
                Re: 9/11 was an inside job.  (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:28 -0500
        Re: 9/11 was an inside job.  (directed to Sar 3 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:02 -0500

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#520772 — Re: Rocky still nuts

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> If you really wanted to know how many lies we were told about 9/11 there are 
> plenty of places to look.

Yep, every one of your posts, though I'm not sure which are delusions
of your pathetic mind and which are your lies.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520818 — Re: Rocky still nuts

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 19:48:47 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> If you really wanted to know how many lies we were told about 9/11 there are 
>> plenty of places to look.
>
>Yep, every one of your posts, though I'm not sure which are delusions
>of your pathetic mind and which are your lies.

Excellent analitical assessment.   Rocky/Roger gives usenet a glimpse
into the deseased mind peering at reality.   He is unable to cope and
shuns those who have challenged and slapped down his rambling and
often changing delusions. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521643 — Re: Rocky still nuts

On 9/13/2015 4:49 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 19:48:47 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> If you really wanted to know how many lies we were told about 9/11 there are
>>> plenty of places to look.
>>
>> Yep, every one of your posts, though I'm not sure which are delusions
>> of your pathetic mind and which are your lies.
>
> Excellent analitical assessment.   Rocky/Roger gives usenet a glimpse
> into the deseased mind peering at reality.   He is unable to cope and
> shuns those who have challenged and slapped down his rambling and
> often changing delusions.
>

or he is used to always being on the losing side, a champion for lost 
causes, for the un-believable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520813 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler )

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:44:40 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
>news:mt4jbp$prp$3@dont-email.me...
>> >
>> "Your Honour, the attorney is a heckler because he keeps asking me 
>> questions that I wont answer"
>
>We have been through this over and over and over again.

Then why can't you answer the queations?

Maybe you should get off newsgroups since clearly you cannot hold your
own on any group.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520980 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler )

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 17:44:17 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:

>On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:44:40 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
>>news:mt4jbp$prp$3@dont-email.me...
>>> >
>>> "Your Honour, the attorney is a heckler because he keeps asking me 
>>> questions that I wont answer"
>>
>>We have been through this over and over and over again.
>
>Then why can't you answer the queations?
>

     To the best of my knowledge, Roger has never offered an actual
answer to any question.

>Maybe you should get off newsgroups since clearly you cannot hold your
>own on any group.

     I think Usenet is a very important part of his life. For most,
Usenet is a place to have fun. For some, it has replaced real life. I
think we all know where Roger is in that.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521027 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler )

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 04:23:35 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
<compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 17:44:17 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:44:40 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
>>>news:mt4jbp$prp$3@dont-email.me...
>>>> >
>>>> "Your Honour, the attorney is a heckler because he keeps asking me 
>>>> questions that I wont answer"
>>>
>>>We have been through this over and over and over again.
>>
>>Then why can't you answer the queations?
>>
>
>     To the best of my knowledge, Roger has never offered an actual
>answer to any question.

He thinks providing youtube video's which don't answer the questions,
answers the questions.

>>Maybe you should get off newsgroups since clearly you cannot hold your
>>own on any group.
>
>     I think Usenet is a very important part of his life. For most,
>Usenet is a place to have fun. For some, it has replaced real life. I
>think we all know where Roger is in that.

Exactly.    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521043 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler )

On Monday, September 14, 2015 at 10:31:17 AM UTC-4, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 04:23:35 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 17:44:17 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:44:40 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
> >>>news:mt4jbp$prp$3@dont-email.me...
> >>>> >
> >>>> "Your Honour, the attorney is a heckler because he keeps asking me 
> >>>> questions that I wont answer"
> >>>
> >>>We have been through this over and over and over again.
> >>
> >>Then why can't you answer the queations?
> >>
> >     To the best of my knowledge, Roger has never offered an actual
> >answer to any question.
> 
> He thinks providing youtube video's which don't answer the questions,
> answers the questions.

A picture is worth a thousand words, moving pictures, a 1000! Squared.

It's youtube videos', like in plural. Are you claiming youtube videos
are a kind of useless? I, for one, would disagree with that claim.

> >>Maybe you should get off newsgroups since clearly you cannot hold your
> >>own on any group.
> >
> >     I think Usenet is a very important part of his life. For most,
> >Usenet is a place to have fun. For some, it has replaced real life. I
> >think we all know where Roger is in that.
> 
> Exactly.

Yes, exactly! Please also eXplane, English is a foreign tongue to me,
does Usenet, as you sayeth, explain replace real life? Tia. It's so
nice when anonymous posters get eachother so perfectly and precisely!

-- Mahipal "Usenet, where anonymous Liars and Kooks can't just stfu."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521183 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler )

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:31:15 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
wrote:

>On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 04:23:35 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
><compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 17:44:17 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:44:40 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
>>>>news:mt4jbp$prp$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>> >
>>>>> "Your Honour, the attorney is a heckler because he keeps asking me 
>>>>> questions that I wont answer"
>>>>
>>>>We have been through this over and over and over again.
>>>
>>>Then why can't you answer the queations?
>>
>>     To the best of my knowledge, Roger has never offered an actual
>>answer to any question.
>

     He will also try to raise points about something else rather than
answer. I'm confident you've noticed. 

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521454 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler )

On 9/14/2015 9:31 AM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 04:23:35 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 17:44:17 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>> wrote:

> He thinks providing youtube video's which don't answer the questions,
> answers the questions.

>>      I think Usenet is a very important part of his life. For most,
>> Usenet is a place to have fun. For some, it has replaced real life. I
>> think we all know where Roger is in that.
>
> Exactly.
>

agree, perhaps Rocky is in a wheelchair, or other,

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521616 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler )

On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:53:29 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
wrote:

>On 9/14/2015 9:31 AM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 04:23:35 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
>> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 17:44:17 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>> wrote:
>
>> He thinks providing youtube video's which don't answer the questions,
>> answers the questions.
>
>>>      I think Usenet is a very important part of his life. For most,
>>> Usenet is a place to have fun. For some, it has replaced real life. I
>>> think we all know where Roger is in that.
>>
>> Exactly.
>>
>
>agree, perhaps Rocky is in a wheelchair, or other,

     It is possible, though he seems to have always taken care of his
health. Here's a picture of Roger in some sort of race.


http://cornbelt.org/img/ccimgs/elaine_roger.jpg


"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520979 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler )

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:44:40 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
>news:mt4jbp$prp$3@dont-email.me...
>> >
>> "Your Honour, the attorney is a heckler because he keeps asking me 
>> questions that I wont answer"
>
>We have been through this over and over and over again.
>
>If you really wanted to know how many lies we were told about 9/11 there are 
>plenty of places to look.
>

     Starting with your posts.

>You don't have to rely on just me you asshole because here is a great place 
>to start:
>
>9/11 Illusions, Special Effects, and Other Magic Tricks
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/01/911-illusions-special-effects-and-other-magic-tricks/

     You keep using other k00ks to support your delusions. This is not
a healthy exercise.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521333 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler )

On 13/09/2015 20:44, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:mt4jbp$prp$3@dont-email.me...
>>>
>> "Your Honour, the attorney is a heckler because he keeps asking me
>> questions that I wont answer"
>
> We have been through this over and over and over again.
>
> If you really wanted to know how many lies we were told about 9/11 there are
> plenty of places to look.
>
> You don't have to rely on just me you asshole because here is a great place
> to start:
>
> 9/11 Illusions, Special Effects, and Other Magic Tricks
>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/01/911-illusions-special-effects-and-other-magic-tricks/
>

So your back to editing posts & name calling.

Have you nothing better?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521416 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to T-annoy the stalker/heckler )

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:51:22 +0100, Tony Dragon
<tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:

>On 13/09/2015 20:44, Rocky wrote:
>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> news:mt4jbp$prp$3@dont-email.me...
>>>>
>>> "Your Honour, the attorney is a heckler because he keeps asking me
>>> questions that I wont answer"
>>
>> We have been through this over and over and over again.
>>
>> If you really wanted to know how many lies we were told about 9/11 there are
>> plenty of places to look.
>>
>> You don't have to rely on just me you asshole because here is a great place
>> to start:
>>
>> 9/11 Illusions, Special Effects, and Other Magic Tricks
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/01/911-illusions-special-effects-and-other-magic-tricks/
>>
>
>So your back to editing posts & name calling.
>
>Have you nothing better?

     When Roger post edits, and he does so a lot, just replace that
which he removed. Or at least enough of it to restore the context that
causes him to soil himself in fear.

"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520787 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler )

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 10:03:23 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:


"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:mt42lh$p5u$3@dont-email.me...
> On 13/09/2015 13:05, Rocky wrote:
>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> news:mt3ofu$gj9$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> You keep on telling us that the flight never took off, what is your
>>>> evidence for this, no youtubes, just tell us.
>>>
>>> You really need to learn how to use google you idiot.  Here let me help 
>>> you  again:
>>>   https://www.google.com/search?q=flight+77+never+existed
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You really should learn to read and understand you idiot, I asked for your 
>> evidence not a Google search link.
>>
>> Present your evidence, your belief, your reasons, if you wish to use a 
>> link to specific sites to back up your evidence do so.
>>
>> Would you stand in a witness box to give evidence, and tell the court to 
>> use Google?
>
>Here, this will help in your self diagnosis:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler
>

Under scruntity Roger/Rocky and his kook conspiracy theories are
falling apart.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521693 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler )

On 9/13/2015 3:27 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:

>>> Present your evidence, your belief, your reasons, if you wish to use a
>>> link to specific sites to back up your evidence do so.
>>>
>>> Would you stand in a witness box to give evidence, and tell the court to
>>> use Google?
>>
>> Here, this will help in your self diagnosis:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler
>>
>
> Under scruntity Roger/Rocky and his kook conspiracy theories are
> falling apart.
>
>

Another notable use of *heckling* in comedy is in the cult favorite 
series Mystery Science Theater 3000. The series involves a man (either 
Joel Robinson or Mike Nelson) and two robots (Tom Servo and Crow T. 
Robot) sitting in a theater mocking bad B-movies. The style, coined as 
riffing, is continued with commentary based series such as Rifftrax and 
Cinematic Titanic.  Good for Stoners.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521762 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler )

On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:16:47 -0500, gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com>
wrote:

>On 9/13/2015 3:27 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>
>>>> Present your evidence, your belief, your reasons, if you wish to use a
>>>> link to specific sites to back up your evidence do so.
>>>>
>>>> Would you stand in a witness box to give evidence, and tell the court to
>>>> use Google?
>>>
>>> Here, this will help in your self diagnosis:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler
>>>
>>
>> Under scruntity Roger/Rocky and his kook conspiracy theories are
>> falling apart.
>
>Another notable use of *heckling* in comedy is in the cult favorite 
>series Mystery Science Theater 3000. 

     That's not actually heckling in the context Roger is using. But
it is funny.

>The series involves a man (either 
>Joel Robinson or Mike Nelson) and two robots (Tom Servo and Crow T. 
>Robot) sitting in a theater mocking bad B-movies. The style, coined as 
>riffing, is continued with commentary based series such as Rifftrax and 
>Cinematic Titanic.  Good for Stoners.

     Good for those who don't partake of illegal drugs as well. 
     I really enjoy RiffTrax. More so now that they're offering VOD
and DVDs so that we don't have to spend time syncing the audio only to
find we're off by a second.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520784 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler )

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 06:11:22 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:3mr9val4k9hm2av941s7mtvc5fkuvh83gh@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:41:34 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Sarah Czepiel" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>news:gen9va13q7dqotrlhfkppfakuku1c48sk9@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An American Airlines plane crashed into the Pentagon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apparently you've forgotten you ran from the smackdown I gave you over
>>>>>> the proximity of the helipad to where Flight 77 entered the Pentagon.
>>>>>
>>>>>That doesn't matter anyway because the jet that left parts on the 
>>>>>heliport
>>>>>never hit the Pentagon anyway.
>>>>
>>>> The heliport had wreckage and parts from an American Airlines plane.
>>>
>>>Even if it was from an AA it wasn't from Flight 77 because that flight never
>>>even took off.
>>
>> And that brings us back to what happened to the passangers, Roger?
>
>What passengers?  

Flight 77's passengers, Roger.   Where did they go?  

DId they disapper into moon dust?  

>How could a flight that never took off or made a 16 foot hole in the Pentagon where it could not 
>have easily fit into be a commercial  jet?

Flight 77 took off Roger.  You've forgotten you claimed they landed in
Cleveland.  

The truth doesn't change Roger.  Your story changes because you can't
keep your lies straight.  

>>>Oh I get it, Sarah Ehrett has been called a lesbian and a stalker.  See:
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.obituaries/9MUQPzSxjLg
>>
>> Not me.  That person got thrown off her IP for forging my name and
>> using my name to stalk and harrass people.
>
>ROTFLMAO because what you have done with me 

Awwww, poor Roger.  

What exactly have I done with you Roger except hold our feet to the
fire demanding you provide proof of your claims.  You have proved to
be abysamal at proving anything except your complete belief in
conspiracy theories providing kook sites and doctored youtube video's
as evidence of your mental illness.

Did you really think you could post to an alt* heirachy newsgroup and
get a "pass" for all your kook claims and psycho behavior?

LOL

> And if you get too involved with Bast then you are probably 
>even a lesbian.

Why don't you hook Bast up with my former stalker, wilma6116@gmail.com
Win win for both the carpet munchers...

  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520786 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler )

"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
news:h1mbvahjvd38b0cpbt63h7jvu8aofgd4go@4ax.com...

Nothing you say matters after I caught  you in two outright lies about the
jury trial that I won 12 to 0 without using an attorney to defend me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520838 — Re: Rocky still raving

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
> news:h1mbvahjvd38b0cpbt63h7jvu8aofgd4go@4ax.com...
> 
> Nothing you say matters after I caught  you in two outright lies about the
> jury trial that I won 12 to 0 without using an attorney to defend me.
 
What lies would that be, delusional fuck wit?

Did they say you should have never been in court and appear sane?
 


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520989 — Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sarah the stalker/heckler )

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 15:25:06 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message 
>news:h1mbvahjvd38b0cpbt63h7jvu8aofgd4go@4ax.com...
>
>Nothing you say matters after I caught  you in two outright lies about the
>jury trial that I won 12 to 0 without using an attorney to defend me.
>
>

     Translated with the aide of the Roger to English dictionary:

     "You keep demanding evidence I can't provide, proving me the
pathetic liar I am in doing so. I'm going to ignore you for a short
time."

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web