Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #566498 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-29 12:34 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-04-14 12:18 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 296 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Why You Should Care About Nukes Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 12:34 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 12:37 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-29 12:59 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 11:25 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 05:08 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 12:33 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-02 15:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-02 20:24 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-03 06:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-03 16:37 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-03 12:33 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-03 18:06 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-03 21:28 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 05:45 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 09:36 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:18 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 14:30 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 20:10 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 06:34 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:23 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 17:52 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 13:10 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 18:37 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 14:29 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 19:59 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 17:05 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 22:18 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 07:14 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 18:41 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 14:46 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 20:21 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 15:56 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 21:39 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 17:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 22:46 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-08 03:35 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 18:04 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 16:19 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 12:16 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:51 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 00:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 18:04 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:16 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 19:44 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 15:21 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 20:57 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 06:51 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 17:09 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 12:42 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 10:51 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 14:56 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 18:29 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 16:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 21:23 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 16:36 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 21:41 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 17:19 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 22:16 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 17:48 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 23:10 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-13 15:30 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 21:05 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-15 08:28 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:02 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-16 22:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 05:21 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-17 02:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 17:22 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-20 03:45 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-20 17:17 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 11:36 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 17:34 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 12:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 18:28 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 19:42 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 14:52 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 20:05 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 16:10 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 21:26 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 13:08 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 20:54 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:12 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-28 19:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 20:20 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 15:37 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 21:56 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 13:22 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 19:14 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 14:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 22:04 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:16 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-28 20:44 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-13 14:12 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-13 15:36 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-13 21:45 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-14 11:12 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 21:19 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 17:38 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 23:08 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-13 15:24 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:37 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-14 07:20 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 17:55 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-14 15:49 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:08 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-15 08:22 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:00 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-16 22:52 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 05:18 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-17 02:54 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 17:21 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-19 16:21 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-19 21:42 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 18:24 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:52 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 19:41 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 14:49 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 20:05 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 15:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 16:04 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 21:24 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 13:05 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 20:52 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:08 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-28 19:48 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 03:04 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-18 07:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 14:40 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-19 16:31 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-20 14:26 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 11:25 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 18:53 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 14:12 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-13 14:26 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-13 15:28 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-13 21:39 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-14 11:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-14 17:36 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-14 15:54 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-15 14:12 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-15 13:39 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 03:00 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-18 07:27 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 14:30 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-19 16:29 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-20 14:19 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 11:34 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:34 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:34 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 11:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 10:12 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:09 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 15:00 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 21:10 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 06:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 15:47 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 12:49 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 19:32 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 16:19 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 21:59 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-13 15:38 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-13 21:35 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-17 09:27 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 03:17 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-20 03:47 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-20 14:32 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 11:39 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 18:58 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 14:19 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:18 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:28 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:52 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 12:20 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 11:00 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 01:20 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:53 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 01:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 18:06 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:12 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 19:47 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 15:27 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-11 20:58 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 12:53 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 11:14 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 14:59 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 18:31 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 12:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 12:53 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 16:09 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 16:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-06 22:08 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 16:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 21:40 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 17:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 22:47 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-08 03:39 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-08 18:05 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:11 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 16:20 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 12:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-10 17:54 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-11 14:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:39 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:15 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:39 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:06 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 19:03 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:21 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-10 04:18 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:44 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:10 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 19:19 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 14:36 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 20:34 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 16:56 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 14:39 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-04-23 10:05 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:43 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 21:28 -0400
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-04-02 23:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-29 18:07 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-29 14:00 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-30 14:24 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-30 15:21 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 03:02 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 04:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 14:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 07:59 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 15:36 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 09:41 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:22 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 14:31 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 20:11 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 16:04 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 21:42 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-07 17:05 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-07 22:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-09 13:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 04:22 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-03-31 12:49 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-31 19:22 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 09:44 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 16:06 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-04 14:33 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-04 21:33 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 06:38 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 12:54 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 14:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 12:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 19:31 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 19:13 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-06 14:32 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-06 20:54 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-09 06:48 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-09 14:32 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-09 09:45 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-09 15:15 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 10:50 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:18 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 15:11 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 22:52 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 17:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 23:28 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-11 20:27 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 16:18 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:54 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-05-09 09:01 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 04:01 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 17:19 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-10 16:47 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-10 22:56 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-11 06:40 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-05-11 22:38 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 03:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 08:47 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:56 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-11 19:31 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 03:56 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 23:39 +0100
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 04:45 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-04 18:25 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 04:01 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 04:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-04-23 09:44 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 12:19 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes vishnushelat@gmail.com - 2016-03-31 12:28 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-31 14:13 -0700
Why You Should Care About Nukes HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:48 -0700
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:18 -0400
Page 3 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 15 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 17:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bdgqtc-t2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569479 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:11bqtc-6hn.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:2f8ltc-3q6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:bj4jtc-41t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:vk0jtc-5ms.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:v3sitc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't know squat about MRR nukes and you >>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>> failed >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> explain why the "seismic signature" of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 were >>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>>>>> smaller than controlled demolitions of the same size buildings. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I at least know what MRR actually means and the seismic signatures >>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>> smaller because there was no exposion of any kind, nuclear or >>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because the truth is they never crashed to the ground >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then what were those many tons of debris dug out of the basement >>>>>>>> levels >>>>>>>> and hualed away from, kook? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why don't you show me there was ever any debris in the basement you >>>>>>> asshole. >>>>>> >>>>>> View any of the many photos of the dump trucks hauling it out, kook. >>>>> >>>>> And you could not find a URL of one why? >>>> >>>> It would be redundant; you have been shown such many times before, kook. >>> >>> The funny thing is that before anything was hauled out of Ground Zero >>> shit >>> was hauled in to help keep the radiation level down. >> >> Only in your delusions as there was no radiation and no nukes as shown >> by seismograph readings. > > THEN EXPLAIN WHY THE SEISMOGRAPH READING PROVE ONLY 20 FLOORS OF WTC2 hit > the ground 26 floors of WTC1 hit the ground and a jackhammer could hit the > ground as hard as WTC7 did. Poor Rocky doesn't understand the difference between force and energy. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 00:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <T7edndowd-h4oZbKnZ2dnUU7-cPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #569484 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:bdgqtc-t2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:11bqtc-6hn.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:2f8ltc-3q6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:bj4jtc-41t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:vk0jtc-5ms.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:v3sitc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't know squat about MRR nukes and you >>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> failed >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> explain why the "seismic signature" of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 were >>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>>>>>> smaller than controlled demolitions of the same size buildings. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I at least know what MRR actually means and the seismic >>>>>>>>>>> signatures >>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>> smaller because there was no exposion of any kind, nuclear or >>>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because the truth is they never crashed to the ground >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then what were those many tons of debris dug out of the basement >>>>>>>>> levels >>>>>>>>> and hualed away from, kook? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why don't you show me there was ever any debris in the basement you >>>>>>>> asshole. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> View any of the many photos of the dump trucks hauling it out, kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> And you could not find a URL of one why? >>>>> >>>>> It would be redundant; you have been shown such many times before, >>>>> kook. >>>> >>>> The funny thing is that before anything was hauled out of Ground Zero >>>> shit >>>> was hauled in to help keep the radiation level down. >>> >>> Only in your delusions as there was no radiation and no nukes as shown >>> by seismograph readings. >> >> THEN EXPLAIN WHY THE SEISMOGRAPH READING PROVE ONLY 20 FLOORS OF WTC2 hit >> the ground 26 floors of WTC1 hit the ground and a jackhammer could hit >> the >> ground as hard as WTC7 did. > > Poor Rocky doesn't understand the difference between force and energy. BULLSHIT because it is you who can't explain them because you don't know the difference. <G> Now tell me why WTC7 didn't have any S-waves or P-waves when it hit the ground after it was vaporized. <G> http://www.slideshare.net/samuelchoi28/seismic-waves-6th Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 18:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <uh5ttc-ji3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569631 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:bdgqtc-t2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:11bqtc-6hn.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:2f8ltc-3q6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:bj4jtc-41t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:vk0jtc-5ms.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:v3sitc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't know squat about MRR nukes and you >>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>> failed >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> explain why the "seismic signature" of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 were >>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller than controlled demolitions of the same size buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I at least know what MRR actually means and the seismic >>>>>>>>>>>> signatures >>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>> smaller because there was no exposion of any kind, nuclear or >>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because the truth is they never crashed to the ground >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Then what were those many tons of debris dug out of the basement >>>>>>>>>> levels >>>>>>>>>> and hualed away from, kook? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why don't you show me there was ever any debris in the basement you >>>>>>>>> asshole. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> View any of the many photos of the dump trucks hauling it out, kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And you could not find a URL of one why? >>>>>> >>>>>> It would be redundant; you have been shown such many times before, >>>>>> kook. >>>>> >>>>> The funny thing is that before anything was hauled out of Ground Zero >>>>> shit >>>>> was hauled in to help keep the radiation level down. >>>> >>>> Only in your delusions as there was no radiation and no nukes as shown >>>> by seismograph readings. >>> >>> THEN EXPLAIN WHY THE SEISMOGRAPH READING PROVE ONLY 20 FLOORS OF WTC2 hit >>> the ground 26 floors of WTC1 hit the ground and a jackhammer could hit >>> the >>> ground as hard as WTC7 did. >> >> Poor Rocky doesn't understand the difference between force and energy. > > BULLSHIT because it is you who can't explain them because you don't know the > difference. force = kg*m/s^2 energy = kg*m^2/s^2 -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 14:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <HvqdnY2D9ZWsZZbKnZ2dnUU7-avNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #569761 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:uh5ttc-ji3.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:bdgqtc-t2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:11bqtc-6hn.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:2f8ltc-3q6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:bj4jtc-41t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:vk0jtc-5ms.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:v3sitc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't know squat about MRR nukes and you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> explain why the "seismic signature" of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller than controlled demolitions of the same size >>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I at least know what MRR actually means and the seismic >>>>>>>>>>>>> signatures >>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller because there was no exposion of any kind, nuclear or >>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because the truth is they never crashed to the ground >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Then what were those many tons of debris dug out of the basement >>>>>>>>>>> levels >>>>>>>>>>> and hualed away from, kook? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why don't you show me there was ever any debris in the basement >>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>> asshole. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> View any of the many photos of the dump trucks hauling it out, >>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And you could not find a URL of one why? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It would be redundant; you have been shown such many times before, >>>>>>> kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> The funny thing is that before anything was hauled out of Ground Zero >>>>>> shit >>>>>> was hauled in to help keep the radiation level down. >>>>> >>>>> Only in your delusions as there was no radiation and no nukes as shown >>>>> by seismograph readings. >>>> >>>> THEN EXPLAIN WHY THE SEISMOGRAPH READING PROVE ONLY 20 FLOORS OF WTC2 >>>> hit >>>> the ground 26 floors of WTC1 hit the ground and a jackhammer could hit >>>> the >>>> ground as hard as WTC7 did. >>> >>> Poor Rocky doesn't understand the difference between force and energy. >> >> BULLSHIT because it is you who can't explain them because you don't know >> the >> difference. > > force = kg*m/s^2 > energy = kg*m^2/s^2 Nope. Guess again but I'll help you this time. Topic: Force vs energy http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=20562.0 :-) Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 19:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <febttc-t84.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569786 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:uh5ttc-ji3.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:bdgqtc-t2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:11bqtc-6hn.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:2f8ltc-3q6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:bj4jtc-41t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:vk0jtc-5ms.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:v3sitc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't know squat about MRR nukes and you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explain why the "seismic signature" of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller than controlled demolitions of the same size >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I at least know what MRR actually means and the seismic >>>>>>>>>>>>>> signatures >>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller because there was no exposion of any kind, nuclear or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because the truth is they never crashed to the ground >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Then what were those many tons of debris dug out of the basement >>>>>>>>>>>> levels >>>>>>>>>>>> and hualed away from, kook? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you show me there was ever any debris in the basement >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>> asshole. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> View any of the many photos of the dump trucks hauling it out, >>>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And you could not find a URL of one why? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It would be redundant; you have been shown such many times before, >>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The funny thing is that before anything was hauled out of Ground Zero >>>>>>> shit >>>>>>> was hauled in to help keep the radiation level down. >>>>>> >>>>>> Only in your delusions as there was no radiation and no nukes as shown >>>>>> by seismograph readings. >>>>> >>>>> THEN EXPLAIN WHY THE SEISMOGRAPH READING PROVE ONLY 20 FLOORS OF WTC2 >>>>> hit >>>>> the ground 26 floors of WTC1 hit the ground and a jackhammer could hit >>>>> the >>>>> ground as hard as WTC7 did. >>>> >>>> Poor Rocky doesn't understand the difference between force and energy. >>> >>> BULLSHIT because it is you who can't explain them because you don't know >>> the >>> difference. >> >> force = kg*m/s^2 >> energy = kg*m^2/s^2 > > Nope. Guess again but I'll help you this time. Yep, basic definitions, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 15:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hsSdneuNteb8mpHKnZ2dnUU7-UvNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #569790 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:febttc-t84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:uh5ttc-ji3.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:bdgqtc-t2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:11bqtc-6hn.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:2f8ltc-3q6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:bj4jtc-41t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:vk0jtc-5ms.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:v3sitc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't know squat about MRR nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explain why the "seismic signature" of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller than controlled demolitions of the same size >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I at least know what MRR actually means and the seismic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signatures >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller because there was no exposion of any kind, nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because the truth is they never crashed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ground >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Then what were those many tons of debris dug out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> basement >>>>>>>>>>>>> levels >>>>>>>>>>>>> and hualed away from, kook? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you show me there was ever any debris in the basement >>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>> asshole. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> View any of the many photos of the dump trucks hauling it out, >>>>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And you could not find a URL of one why? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It would be redundant; you have been shown such many times before, >>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The funny thing is that before anything was hauled out of Ground >>>>>>>> Zero >>>>>>>> shit >>>>>>>> was hauled in to help keep the radiation level down. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only in your delusions as there was no radiation and no nukes as >>>>>>> shown >>>>>>> by seismograph readings. >>>>>> >>>>>> THEN EXPLAIN WHY THE SEISMOGRAPH READING PROVE ONLY 20 FLOORS OF WTC2 >>>>>> hit >>>>>> the ground 26 floors of WTC1 hit the ground and a jackhammer could >>>>>> hit >>>>>> the >>>>>> ground as hard as WTC7 did. >>>>> >>>>> Poor Rocky doesn't understand the difference between force and energy. >>>> >>>> BULLSHIT because it is you who can't explain them because you don't >>>> know >>>> the >>>> difference. >>> >>> force = kg*m/s^2 >>> energy = kg*m^2/s^2 >> >> Nope. Guess again but I'll help you this time. > > Yep, basic definitions, kook. You are still running from the fact that a jackhammer can hit the ground as hard as WTC7 did. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 20:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qmfttc-mm4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569793 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:febttc-t84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:uh5ttc-ji3.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:bdgqtc-t2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:11bqtc-6hn.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:2f8ltc-3q6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:bj4jtc-41t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vk0jtc-5ms.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:v3sitc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't know squat about MRR nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explain why the "seismic signature" of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller than controlled demolitions of the same size >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I at least know what MRR actually means and the seismic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signatures >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller because there was no exposion of any kind, nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because the truth is they never crashed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ground >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then what were those many tons of debris dug out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> basement >>>>>>>>>>>>>> levels >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and hualed away from, kook? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you show me there was ever any debris in the basement >>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>> asshole. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> View any of the many photos of the dump trucks hauling it out, >>>>>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And you could not find a URL of one why? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It would be redundant; you have been shown such many times before, >>>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The funny thing is that before anything was hauled out of Ground >>>>>>>>> Zero >>>>>>>>> shit >>>>>>>>> was hauled in to help keep the radiation level down. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only in your delusions as there was no radiation and no nukes as >>>>>>>> shown >>>>>>>> by seismograph readings. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> THEN EXPLAIN WHY THE SEISMOGRAPH READING PROVE ONLY 20 FLOORS OF WTC2 >>>>>>> hit >>>>>>> the ground 26 floors of WTC1 hit the ground and a jackhammer could >>>>>>> hit >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> ground as hard as WTC7 did. >>>>>> >>>>>> Poor Rocky doesn't understand the difference between force and energy. >>>>> >>>>> BULLSHIT because it is you who can't explain them because you don't >>>>> know >>>>> the >>>>> difference. >>>> >>>> force = kg*m/s^2 >>>> energy = kg*m^2/s^2 >>> >>> Nope. Guess again but I'll help you this time. >> >> Yep, basic definitions, kook. > > You are still running from the fact that a jackhammer can hit the ground as > hard as WTC7 did. You still can't tell the difference between force and energy, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 06:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <os2dnSMqjeHKfJHKnZ2dnUU7-YHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #569802 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:qmfttc-mm4.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:febttc-t84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:uh5ttc-ji3.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:bdgqtc-t2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:11bqtc-6hn.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:2f8ltc-3q6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:bj4jtc-41t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vk0jtc-5ms.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:v3sitc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't know squat about MRR nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explain why the "seismic signature" of WTC1, WTC2 and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WTC7 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller than controlled demolitions of the same size >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I at least know what MRR actually means and the seismic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signatures >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller because there was no exposion of any kind, nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because the truth is they never crashed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ground >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then what were those many tons of debris dug out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> levels >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and hualed away from, kook? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you show me there was ever any debris in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> basement >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> asshole. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> View any of the many photos of the dump trucks hauling it out, >>>>>>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And you could not find a URL of one why? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It would be redundant; you have been shown such many times >>>>>>>>>>> before, >>>>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The funny thing is that before anything was hauled out of Ground >>>>>>>>>> Zero >>>>>>>>>> shit >>>>>>>>>> was hauled in to help keep the radiation level down. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Only in your delusions as there was no radiation and no nukes as >>>>>>>>> shown >>>>>>>>> by seismograph readings. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> THEN EXPLAIN WHY THE SEISMOGRAPH READING PROVE ONLY 20 FLOORS OF >>>>>>>> WTC2 >>>>>>>> hit >>>>>>>> the ground 26 floors of WTC1 hit the ground and a jackhammer could >>>>>>>> hit >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> ground as hard as WTC7 did. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Poor Rocky doesn't understand the difference between force and >>>>>>> energy. >>>>>> >>>>>> BULLSHIT because it is you who can't explain them because you don't >>>>>> know >>>>>> the >>>>>> difference. >>>>> >>>>> force = kg*m/s^2 >>>>> energy = kg*m^2/s^2 >>>> >>>> Nope. Guess again but I'll help you this time. >>> >>> Yep, basic definitions, kook. >> >> You are still running from the fact that a jackhammer can hit the ground >> as >> hard as WTC7 did. > > You still can't tell the difference between force and energy, kook. And you can't tell the difference between the seismic reading of WTC7 hitting the ground and a jackhammer hitting the ground because the alleged collapse of WTC7 only registered a .6 or .06 on the Richter scale. That low number should make you think but you quit thinking a long long time ago as proven by your total lack of facts. And don't forget all collapsing buildings leave "Surviving Corners.." NOT http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 17:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ommvtc-24f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569888 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:qmfttc-mm4.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:febttc-t84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:uh5ttc-ji3.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:bdgqtc-t2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:11bqtc-6hn.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:2f8ltc-3q6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:bj4jtc-41t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vk0jtc-5ms.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:v3sitc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't know squat about MRR nukes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explain why the "seismic signature" of WTC1, WTC2 and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WTC7 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller than controlled demolitions of the same size >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I at least know what MRR actually means and the seismic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signatures >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller because there was no exposion of any kind, nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because the truth is they never crashed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ground >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then what were those many tons of debris dug out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> levels >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and hualed away from, kook? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you show me there was ever any debris in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asshole. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> View any of the many photos of the dump trucks hauling it out, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And you could not find a URL of one why? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It would be redundant; you have been shown such many times >>>>>>>>>>>> before, >>>>>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The funny thing is that before anything was hauled out of Ground >>>>>>>>>>> Zero >>>>>>>>>>> shit >>>>>>>>>>> was hauled in to help keep the radiation level down. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Only in your delusions as there was no radiation and no nukes as >>>>>>>>>> shown >>>>>>>>>> by seismograph readings. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> THEN EXPLAIN WHY THE SEISMOGRAPH READING PROVE ONLY 20 FLOORS OF >>>>>>>>> WTC2 >>>>>>>>> hit >>>>>>>>> the ground 26 floors of WTC1 hit the ground and a jackhammer could >>>>>>>>> hit >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> ground as hard as WTC7 did. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Poor Rocky doesn't understand the difference between force and >>>>>>>> energy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BULLSHIT because it is you who can't explain them because you don't >>>>>>> know >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> difference. >>>>>> >>>>>> force = kg*m/s^2 >>>>>> energy = kg*m^2/s^2 >>>>> >>>>> Nope. Guess again but I'll help you this time. >>>> >>>> Yep, basic definitions, kook. >>> >>> You are still running from the fact that a jackhammer can hit the ground >>> as >>> hard as WTC7 did. >> >> You still can't tell the difference between force and energy, kook. > > And you can't tell the difference between the seismic reading of WTC7 > hitting the ground and a jackhammer hitting the ground because the alleged Sure you can; no seismic readings from a hackjammer more than a few hundred feet away. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 12:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <QNSdnf3CzJEGrpDKnZ2dnUU7-dfNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #569929 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:ommvtc-24f.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:qmfttc-mm4.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:febttc-t84.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:uh5ttc-ji3.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:bdgqtc-t2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:11bqtc-6hn.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:2f8ltc-3q6.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:bj4jtc-41t.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vk0jtc-5ms.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:v3sitc-31s.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you don't know squat about MRR nukes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explain why the "seismic signature" of WTC1, WTC2 and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WTC7 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller than controlled demolitions of the same size >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I at least know what MRR actually means and the seismic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signatures >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller because there was no exposion of any kind, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because the truth is they never crashed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ground >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then what were those many tons of debris dug out of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> levels >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and hualed away from, kook? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you show me there was ever any debris in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basement >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asshole. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> View any of the many photos of the dump trucks hauling it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you could not find a URL of one why? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be redundant; you have been shown such many times >>>>>>>>>>>>> before, >>>>>>>>>>>>> kook. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The funny thing is that before anything was hauled out of >>>>>>>>>>>> Ground >>>>>>>>>>>> Zero >>>>>>>>>>>> shit >>>>>>>>>>>> was hauled in to help keep the radiation level down. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Only in your delusions as there was no radiation and no nukes as >>>>>>>>>>> shown >>>>>>>>>>> by seismograph readings. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> THEN EXPLAIN WHY THE SEISMOGRAPH READING PROVE ONLY 20 FLOORS OF >>>>>>>>>> WTC2 >>>>>>>>>> hit >>>>>>>>>> the ground 26 floors of WTC1 hit the ground and a jackhammer >>>>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>>> hit >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> ground as hard as WTC7 did. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Poor Rocky doesn't understand the difference between force and >>>>>>>>> energy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BULLSHIT because it is you who can't explain them because you don't >>>>>>>> know >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> difference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> force = kg*m/s^2 >>>>>>> energy = kg*m^2/s^2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. Guess again but I'll help you this time. >>>>> >>>>> Yep, basic definitions, kook. >>>> >>>> You are still running from the fact that a jackhammer can hit the >>>> ground >>>> as >>>> hard as WTC7 did. >>> >>> You still can't tell the difference between force and energy, kook. >> >> And you can't tell the difference between the seismic reading of WTC7 >> hitting the ground and a jackhammer hitting the ground because the >> alleged > > Sure you can; no seismic readings from a hackjammer more than a few > hundred feet away. run run run when the issue is all three of the vaporized buildings prove very little of them actually hit the ground even though it looks like a lot of WTC7 hit the ground it probably landed on the vaporized WTC7 and in effect landed on a pillow. So don't forget even the seismic records that you have prove there was something very unusual about the destruction of three buildings at the World Trade Center because they are much smaller than they should have been for the size buildings that went down or were supposed to have gone down and ended up floating away instead. <G> Open your eyes because 9/11 was a inside job and you have the evidence too. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 10:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f0e9888b-4649-4789-a231-4283f5ef8728@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #569940 |
Open your eyes because 9/11 was a inside job and you have the evidence too. <G> Rocky ------------ Many kooks whose name I won't mention (BJ) agree with you, Rocko. They remain silent so that they won't appear to be as stupid as you. Ps- BJ also believes in ghosts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 14:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0ybPy.27$UA7.17@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #569943 |
On 04/12/2016 01:51 PM, HVAC wrote:
>
> Open your eyes because 9/11 was a inside job and you have the evidence too.
> <G>
> Rocky
> ------------
>
> Many kooks whose name I won't mention (BJ) agree with you, Rocko.
>
> They remain silent so that they won't appear to be as stupid as you.
>
> Ps- BJ also believes in ghosts
Obvious lie. 9/11 wasn't an "inside" job it was a job given a little
outside assistance to make sure it came off as planned. The "patriot
act" to turn America into HVAC's dream of a tin horn dictatorship needed
an excuse to be passed. And as usual, it got one.
HVAC loves dictatorship. In his Walter MItty world he imagines himself
Napoleon and emperor of the world.
He also believes in Ghosts and thinks he has ESP to know what people are
thinking. I can do that too. My ESP tells me that everyone reading HVAC
believes he's a nutjob that was turned out on the streets by Libs when
they emptied the state asylums.
PS. HVAC is gay and never denies it. Ne needs to come out.
You mad, HVAC?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 18:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vdrvtc-9of.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569940 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> Sure you can; no seismic readings from a hackjammer more than a few >> hundred feet away. > > So don't forget even the seismic records that you have prove there was > something very unusual about the destruction of three buildings at the World > Trade Center because they are much smaller than they should have been for > the size buildings that went down or were supposed to have gone down and > ended up floating away instead. Nope, nothing unusual about the readings at all. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 16:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <a5adnZBiS4r5_5DKnZ2dnUU7-d3NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #569952 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:vdrvtc-9of.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >>> Sure you can; no seismic readings from a hackjammer more than a few >>> hundred feet away. >> >> So don't forget even the seismic records that you have prove there was >> something very unusual about the destruction of three buildings at the >> World >> Trade Center because they are much smaller than they should have been for >> the size buildings that went down or were supposed to have gone down and >> ended up floating away instead. > > Nope, nothing unusual about the readings at all. Funny how you do not have any supporting evidence. ROTFLMAO Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 21:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nejp0q$li$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #569986 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: ><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >news:vdrvtc-9of.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> So don't forget even the seismic records that you have prove there was >>> something very unusual about the destruction of three buildings at the >>> World Trade Center because they are much smaller than they should have >>> been for the size buildings that went down or were supposed to have >>> gone down and ended up floating away instead. >> >> Nope, nothing unusual about the readings at all. >Funny how you do not have any supporting evidence. ROTFLMAO And your evidence the readings were too low or "unusual" is..... (And there he goes! Off like a flash! Run Away Roger is running away yet again!!!!)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 16:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ErydnbaH3K7O95DKnZ2dnUU7-VnNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #569994 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:nejp0q$li$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>news:vdrvtc-9of.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>> So don't forget even the seismic records that you have prove there was >>>> something very unusual about the destruction of three buildings at the >>>> World Trade Center because they are much smaller than they should have >>>> been for the size buildings that went down or were supposed to have >>>> gone down and ended up floating away instead. >>> >>> Nope, nothing unusual about the readings at all. > >>Funny how you do not have any supporting evidence. ROTFLMAO > > And your evidence the readings were too low or "unusual" is..... missing because Jim failed to post any supporting evidence with his post. DUH Gaud that was a stupid question. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 21:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nejq2i$2hm$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #569998 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:nejp0q$li$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>news:vdrvtc-9of.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> Nope, nothing unusual about the readings at all. >> >>>Funny how you do not have any supporting evidence. ROTFLMAO >> >> And your evidence the readings were too low or "unusual" is..... >missing because Jim failed to post any supporting evidence with his post. >DUH Gaud that was a stupid question. Why would Jim have to prove your kookclaim the seismometer readings were too low or "unusual" when that was YOUR claim? It wasn't a stupid question, but your sure came up with a stupid answer for it!!! Now, keep running away! <cue Monty Python>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 17:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ktudnTGXfMjg6ZDKnZ2dnUU7-V_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #569999 |
"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:nejq2i$2hm$1@pcls7.std.com... > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > >>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >>news:nejp0q$li$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>>><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>news:vdrvtc-9of.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > >>>>> Nope, nothing unusual about the readings at all. >>> >>>>Funny how you do not have any supporting evidence. ROTFLMAO >>> >>> And your evidence the readings were too low or "unusual" is..... > >>missing because Jim failed to post any supporting evidence with his post. >>DUH Gaud that was a stupid question. > > Why would Jim have to prove your kookclaim the seismometer readings > were too low or "unusual" when that was YOUR claim? You are fcuked up because it was Jim that stated: "Nope, nothing unusual about the readings at all" and he has absolutely no supporting evidence of his claim because if he posted the seismic readings he would be posting crashes of buildings comparable to much mush smaller buildings and in the case of WTC7 comparable to a jackhammer instead of a 47 story building. ROTFLMAO And I can't forget to post the "Surviving Corners" that you claim zillions of pounds of debris, or something like that went right through to end up in the basement. ROTFLMAO http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 22:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <km80uc-n3h.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #569998 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:nejp0q$li$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >> >>><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>news:vdrvtc-9of.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>>> So don't forget even the seismic records that you have prove there was >>>>> something very unusual about the destruction of three buildings at the >>>>> World Trade Center because they are much smaller than they should have >>>>> been for the size buildings that went down or were supposed to have >>>>> gone down and ended up floating away instead. >>>> >>>> Nope, nothing unusual about the readings at all. >> >>>Funny how you do not have any supporting evidence. ROTFLMAO >> >> And your evidence the readings were too low or "unusual" is..... > > missing because Jim failed to post any supporting evidence with his post. The seismic records on 9/11 have been posted many times by many people. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 17:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <MOWdnYEm0o2l5pDKnZ2dnUU7-R3NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #570017 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:km80uc-n3h.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >> news:nejp0q$li$1@pcls7.std.com... >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>> >>>><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>news:vdrvtc-9of.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>>>> So don't forget even the seismic records that you have prove there >>>>>> was >>>>>> something very unusual about the destruction of three buildings at >>>>>> the >>>>>> World Trade Center because they are much smaller than they should >>>>>> have >>>>>> been for the size buildings that went down or were supposed to have >>>>>> gone down and ended up floating away instead. >>>>> >>>>> Nope, nothing unusual about the readings at all. >>> >>>>Funny how you do not have any supporting evidence. ROTFLMAO >>> >>> And your evidence the readings were too low or "unusual" is..... >> >> missing because Jim failed to post any supporting evidence with his post. > > The seismic records on 9/11 have been posted many times by many people. You are dead wrong about WTC7 but what they didn't do with the seismic records from WTC1 and WTC2 is what is important. They have never been compared to other collapsing buildings or jackhammers and they should have been. If the Twin Towers collapsed down why did so much remain at the very bottom? Obviously they collapsed up or floated away instead. DUH http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web