Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517044 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-26 13:18 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-08-27 20:06 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 39 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 13:18 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 12:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 20:36 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 00:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 01:16 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 14:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 09:33 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:31 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 05:40 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 01:29 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 17:17 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 22:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 20:13 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 22:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 18:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 19:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:06 -0500
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 13:18 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) |
| Message-ID | <3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com> |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com... >> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later. duh. >> >> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over them. LOL > >I answered some of your newest post first you clown. So I just didn't get >to it in time. DUH. "in time" ? You responded to *all of my posts* and then claimed you'd skipped over them. >> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard. >9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon. Had he attended the 9AM briefing instead of the scheduled 10AM briefing he would have been killed as Flight 77 hit the Navy spaces, specifically the CNO-IP. Every one here who has addressed your claims and conspiracy theories has proven using scientific facts that your crazy claims are just that, crazy. Not one word coming from your devolving journey into madness is the truth about what happened on 9/11/01.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-26 15:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pPedneVs2bl7g0PInZ2dnUU7-LGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517044 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com... > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com... >>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later. duh. >>> >>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over them. >>> LOL >> >>I answered some of your newest post first you clown. So I just didn't get >>to it in time. DUH. > > "in time" ? You responded to *all of my posts* and then claimed you'd > skipped over them. > >>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard. > >>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness > > I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting > the > Pentagon. But you never told me what he said. Did he say he saw it or just heard someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony because the first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor. <G> PLUS the flight path for the alleged Flight 77 has the jet doing a 270 degree spiral dive to line up with the back side of the Pentagon. The funny thing is NOBODY and I mean NOBODY saw that 270 degree turn and yet that is what we were told it did. <G> 9/11 was all smoke and mirrors, CGI and nukes and as hard as it might be for some people to take I can take the most damaging evidence from NIST and prove their "Hypothetical Collapse Initiation" was complete and udder bullshit. See: Playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 12:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517088 |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com... >>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later. duh. >>>> >>>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over them. >>>> LOL >>> >>>I answered some of your newest post first you clown. So I just didn't get >>>to it in time. DUH. >> >> "in time" ? You responded to *all of my posts* and then claimed you'd >> skipped over them. >> >>>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard. >> >>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness >> >> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting >> the Pentagon. > >But you never told me what he said. Did he say he saw it or just heard >someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony because the >first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor. <G> eye·wit·ness. NOUN 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London blitz" synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator · watcher · [more]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 16:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <V8CdnfETc4fHHULInZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517213 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com... > On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com... >>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com... >>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later. duh. >>>>> >>>>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over them. >>>>> LOL >>>> >>>>I answered some of your newest post first you clown. So I just didn't >>>>get >>>>to it in time. DUH. >>> >>> "in time" ? You responded to *all of my posts* and then claimed you'd >>> skipped over them. >>> >>>>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard. >>> >>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness >>> >>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting >>> the Pentagon. >> >>But you never told me what he said. Did he say he saw it or just heard >>someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony because >>the >>first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor. <G> > > eye·wit·ness. > > NOUN > > 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a > first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London blitz" > > synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator · watcher > · > [more] More commonly known as a lie-witness when it comes to the numerous items that prove there was no 757 at the Pentagon. Now why do you keep avoiding the question? Don't tell me what he thought he saw I want to know what he saw. DUH. Nuclear destruction of the WTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 20:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bk8vtal54ce0sof10l6sj1runnfjis946b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517293 |
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com... >>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com... >>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later. duh. >>>>>> >>>>>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over them. >>>>>> LOL >>>>> >>>>>I answered some of your newest post first you clown. So I just didn't >>>>>get >>>>>to it in time. DUH. >>>> >>>> "in time" ? You responded to *all of my posts* and then claimed you'd >>>> skipped over them. >>>> >>>>>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard. >>>> >>>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness >>>> >>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting >>>> the Pentagon. >>> >>>But you never told me what he said. Did he say he saw it or just heard >>>someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony because the >>>first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor. <G> >> >> eye·wit·ness. >> >> NOUN >> >> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a >> first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London blitz" >> >> synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator · watcher >> · >> [more] > > >Now why do you keep avoiding the question? Don't tell me what he thought he >saw I want to know what he saw. DUH I told you what he saw. Read it again. SE: my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon. DEF: eye·wit·ness. NOUN 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a first-hand description of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 17:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8nl0qf.ai6.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #517350 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >> news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>> news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com... >>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>> No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until >>>>>>>> later. duh. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over >>>>>>> them. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> I answered some of your newest post first you clown. So I just >>>>>> didn't get >>>>>> to it in time. DUH. >>>>> >>>>> "in time" ? You responded to *all of my posts* and then >>>>> claimed you'd skipped over them. >>>>> >>>>>>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard. >>>>> >>>>>> 9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness >>>>> >>>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane >>>>> hitting the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> But you never told me what he said. Did he say he saw it or just >>>> heard someone else say he saw it which is on par with other >>>> testimony because the first person to say they saw it would have >>>> to be a crisis actor. <G> >>> >>> eye·wit·ness. >>> >>> NOUN >>> >>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give >>> a first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London >>> blitz" >>> >>> synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator · >>> watcher · >>> [more] >> >> >> Now why do you keep avoiding the question? Don't tell me what he >> thought he saw I want to know what he saw. DUH > > > I told you what he saw. Read it again. > > SE: my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon. > > DEF: eye·wit·ness. > > NOUN > > 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a > first-hand description of it. rocky didn't like it when he found out i was in tower 1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 00:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ur-dneaJPMNScULInZ2dnUU7-eednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517350 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:bk8vtal54ce0sof10l6sj1runnfjis946b@4ax.com... > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com... >>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later. >>>>>>>>duh. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You answered the posts before you claimed you've skipped over them. >>>>>>> LOL >>>>>> >>>>>>I answered some of your newest post first you clown. So I just didn't >>>>>>get >>>>>>to it in time. DUH. >>>>> >>>>> "in time" ? You responded to *all of my posts* and then claimed >>>>> you'd >>>>> skipped over them. >>>>> >>>>>>> All the BS meters on usenet are PINGed to starboard. >>>>> >>>>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness >>>>> >>>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane >>>>> hitting >>>>> the Pentagon. >>>> >>>>But you never told me what he said. Did he say he saw it or just heard >>>>someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony because >>>>the >>>>first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor. <G> >>> >>> eye·wit·ness. >>> >>> NOUN >>> >>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a >>> first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London blitz" >>> >>> synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator · >>> watcher >>> · >>> [more] >> >> >>Now why do you keep avoiding the question? Don't tell me what he thought >>he >>saw I want to know what he saw. DUH > > > I told you what he saw. Read it again. > > SE: my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon. > > DEF: eye·wit·ness. > > NOUN > > 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a > first-hand description of it. Mike Walter, another lie witness at the Pentagon said the wings folded back like the wings of a bird. Did he see that too? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 01:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <icrvtadepc060l0km2up26uvvg2j8uskpg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517379 |
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:07:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:bk8vtal54ce0sof10l6sj1runnfjis946b@4ax.com... >> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com... >>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com... >>>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com... >>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later. >>>>>>>>>duh. >>>>>> >>>>>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness >>>>>> >>>>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting >>>>>> the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>>But you never told me what he said. Did he say he saw it or just heard >>>>>someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony because the >>>>>first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor. <G> >>>> >>>> eye·wit·ness. >>>> >>>> NOUN >>>> >>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a >>>> first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London blitz" >>>> >>>> synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator · >>>> watcher >>>> · >>>> [more] >>> >>> >>>Now why do you keep avoiding the question? Don't tell me what he thought he >>>saw I want to know what he saw. DUH >> >> >> I told you what he saw. Read it again. >> >> SE: my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon. >> >> DEF: eye·wit·ness. >> >> NOUN >> >> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a >> first-hand description of it. > >Mike Walter, another lie witness at the Pentagon Who's Mike Walter? And where was he located at the Pentagon? said the wings folded back like the >wings of a bird. Did he see that too? >Rocky >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 08:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <69KdnaY14byx-X3InZ2dnUU7-bOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517381 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:icrvtadepc060l0km2up26uvvg2j8uskpg@4ax.com... > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:07:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:bk8vtal54ce0sof10l6sj1runnfjis946b@4ax.com... >>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com... >>>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com... >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later. >>>>>>>>>>duh. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane >>>>>>> hitting >>>>>>> the Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>>But you never told me what he said. Did he say he saw it or just >>>>>>heard >>>>>>someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony >>>>>>because the >>>>>>first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor. <G> >>>>> >>>>> eye·wit·ness. >>>>> >>>>> NOUN >>>>> >>>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a >>>>> first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London >>>>> blitz" >>>>> >>>>> synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator · >>>>> watcher >>>>> · >>>>> [more] >>>> >>>> >>>>Now why do you keep avoiding the question? Don't tell me what he >>>>thought he >>>>saw I want to know what he saw. DUH >>> >>> >>> I told you what he saw. Read it again. >>> >>> SE: my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon. >>> >>> DEF: eye·wit·ness. >>> >>> NOUN >>> >>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a >>> first-hand description of it. >> >>Mike Walter, another lie witness at the Pentagon > > Who's Mike Walter? And where was he located at the Pentagon? He was driving by and claimed to see everything but he had to change his story like most liars do: I have the following link start where he uses his hands to claim the wings folded back like the wings on a bird. See: 9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk?t=2m1s > said the wings folded back like the >>wings of a bird. Did he see that too? For the sake of the argument let us say the wings folded back like the wing on a bird. Now why did they only find one small engine? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 17:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrj6bc-427.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517407 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > He was driving by and claimed to see everything but he had to change his > story like most liars do: I have the following link start where he uses his > hands to claim the wings folded back like the wings on a bird. See: So out of hundreds of witnesses you pick one guy with a claim that the other hundreds didn't make, you raving lunatic? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 14:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hd91ua5l6e1kb2k12oesc6b3nb381bet06@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517407 |
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:39:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:icrvtadepc060l0km2up26uvvg2j8uskpg@4ax.com... >> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:07:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>news:bk8vtal54ce0sof10l6sj1runnfjis946b@4ax.com... >>>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com... >>>>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com... >>>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com... >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later. >>>>>>>>>>>duh. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane >>>>>>>> hitting >>>>>>>> the Pentagon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>But you never told me what he said. Did he say he saw it or just >>>>>>>heard >>>>>>>someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony >>>>>>>because the >>>>>>>first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor. <G> >>>>>> >>>>>> eye·wit·ness. >>>>>> >>>>>> NOUN >>>>>> >>>>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a >>>>>> first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London >>>>>> blitz" >>>>>> >>>>>> synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator · >>>>>> watcher >>>>>> · >>>>>> [more] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Now why do you keep avoiding the question? Don't tell me what he >>>>>thought he >>>>>saw I want to know what he saw. DUH >>>> >>>> >>>> I told you what he saw. Read it again. >>>> >>>> SE: my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon. >>>> >>>> DEF: eye·wit·ness. >>>> >>>> NOUN >>>> >>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a >>>> first-hand description of it. >>> >>>Mike Walter, another lie witness at the Pentagon >> >> Who's Mike Walter? And where was he located at the Pentagon? > >He was driving by Don't just say he was driving by, *where was he located* when he was driving by? and claimed to see everything but he had to change his >story like most liars do: I have the following link start where he uses his >hands to claim the wings folded back like the wings on a bird. And the kind of bird ? Sparrow? Blue Jay? Hummingbird? <BLINKBLINKBLINK> See: > >9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter > https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk?t=2m1s > >> said the wings folded back like the >>>wings of a bird. Did he see that too? > >For the sake of the argument let us say the wings folded back like the wing >on a bird. Now why did they only find one small engine? No Joy. Goalpost move. <click> >Rocky >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 15:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <heWdnXAVzNVaW33InZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517473 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:hd91ua5l6e1kb2k12oesc6b3nb381bet06@4ax.com... > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:39:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>news:icrvtadepc060l0km2up26uvvg2j8uskpg@4ax.com... >>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:07:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>news:bk8vtal54ce0sof10l6sj1runnfjis946b@4ax.com... >>>>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:25:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>news:0rcuta1okvbrfbdk49qn72bj2ni6qaqvjc@4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:17:05 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>news:3dsrtapm77uroqkh3vhraucr00q864ack4@4ax.com... >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 07:02:41 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>news:nr25ta128ebm8koo8jo129b36nbj551p4f@4ax.com... >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:01:48 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>No, it was just one of you post that I skipped over until later. >>>>>>>>>>>>duh. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've already told you my husband was an eyewitness to the plane >>>>>>>>> hitting >>>>>>>>> the Pentagon. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>But you never told me what he said. Did he say he saw it or just >>>>>>>>heard >>>>>>>>someone else say he saw it which is on par with other testimony >>>>>>>>because the >>>>>>>>first person to say they saw it would have to be a crisis actor. >>>>>>>><G> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> eye·wit·ness. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> NOUN >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> first-hand description of it: "eyewitness accounts of the London >>>>>>> blitz" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> synonyms: observer · onlooker · witness · bystander · spectator · >>>>>>> watcher >>>>>>> · >>>>>>> [more] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Now why do you keep avoiding the question? Don't tell me what he >>>>>>thought he >>>>>>saw I want to know what he saw. DUH >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I told you what he saw. Read it again. >>>>> >>>>> SE: my husband was an eyewitness to the plane hitting the Pentagon. >>>>> >>>>> DEF: eye·wit·ness. >>>>> >>>>> NOUN >>>>> >>>>> 1.a person who has personally seen something happen and so can give a >>>>> first-hand description of it. >>>> >>>>Mike Walter, another lie witness at the Pentagon >>> >>> Who's Mike Walter? And where was he located at the Pentagon? >> >>He was driving by > > Don't just say he was driving by, *where was he located* when he was > driving by? > > > and claimed to see everything but he had to change his >>story like most liars do: I have the following link start where he uses >>his >>hands to claim the wings folded back like the wings on a bird. > > And the kind of bird ? > > Sparrow? > > Blue Jay? > > Hummingbird? > > <BLINKBLINKBLINK> What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story is why he changed his story. Make Walter changed his story because of the lack of debris from a 757 that is also solid evidence that there was no 757 at the Pentagon. He had to make it appear that the 757 disappeared like a bird going into a birdhouse. A very good video that deals almost explicitly with bullshit the media told us about the Pentagon is: Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXBk8JqwFlw > See: >> >>9/11 Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Mike Walter >> https://youtu.be/f0vxc50xAbk?t=2m1s >> >>> said the wings folded back like the >>>>wings of a bird. Did he see that too? >> >>For the sake of the argument let us say the wings folded back like the >>wing >>on a bird. Now why did they only find one small engine? > > No Joy. Goalpost move. To me, there was so much bullshit about the Pentagon on 9/11/01 I had trouble with the "Official Story" from that day on. > <click> > >>Rocky Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 21:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vav6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517510 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story is why he > changed his story. What one guy out of hundreds might have said is irrelevant, yoy brain dead, delusional, idiot. <snip remaing kook babble ravingis> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 18:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <w8ydnfHFcMFZc33InZ2dnUU7-bednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517516 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:vav6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story is why >> he >> changed his story. > > What one guy out of hundreds might have said is irrelevant, yoy brain > dead, delusional, idiot. Not quite because one clearly bogus story puts the doubt on all of them especially since there was more debris from a jet by the Heliport than there was by the big hole in the wall. Behind the Smoke Curtain - 2nd Edition (2015) (time indexed to start at 24:45) https://youtu.be/VXBk8JqwFlw?t=24m45s Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 23:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <j687bc-m49.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517531 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Not quite because one clearly bogus story puts the doubt on all of them > especially since there was more debris from a jet by the Heliport than there > was by the big hole in the wall. That is the raving nonsense of a peranoid delusional fuckwit. It is very often the case that one witness account will vary in some way from others, retarded kook. There were hundreds of witnesses, brain dead lunatic. Where the debris wound up is irrelevant, idiotic, bat shit crazy, nut job. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-28 19:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mrqvtk$9m3$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517531 |
On 8/28/2015 6:28 PM, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:vav6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story is why >>> he >>> changed his story. >> >> What one guy out of hundreds might have said is irrelevant, yoy brain >> dead, delusional, idiot. > > Not quite because one clearly bogus story puts the doubt on all of them > especially since there was more debris from a jet by the Heliport than there > was by the big hole in the wall. that makes no sense at all. > > Behind the Smoke-um Dope-um Curtain - 12nd Edition (2018) > (time indexed to start at 204:45) > https://youGotManB00BS.be/VwrsXBk8JqwFlffw?t=2224m45s > > Rocky, the lying Squirrely > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 09:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrrqmd$a1g$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517550 |
On 29/08/2015 01:55, gilber34 wrote: > On 8/28/2015 6:28 PM, Rocky wrote: >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:vav6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story >>>> is why >>>> he >>>> changed his story. >>> >>> What one guy out of hundreds might have said is irrelevant, yoy brain >>> dead, delusional, idiot. >> >> Not quite because one clearly bogus story puts the doubt on all of them >> especially since there was more debris from a jet by the Heliport than >> there >> was by the big hole in the wall. > > that makes no sense at all. > It does to him, but turning this 'logic' on him means all his claims are in doubt. >> >> Behind the Smoke-um Dope-um Curtain - 12nd Edition (2018) >> (time indexed to start at 204:45) >> https://youGotManB00BS.be/VwrsXBk8JqwFlffw?t=2224m45s >> >> Rocky, the lying Squirrely >> >> > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 10:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <UvudnctvFqqZVnzInZ2dnUU7-eWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517586 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mrrqmd$a1g$1@dont-email.me... > On 29/08/2015 01:55, gilber34 wrote: >> On 8/28/2015 6:28 PM, Rocky wrote: >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:vav6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story >>>>> is why >>>>> he >>>>> changed his story. >>>> >>>> What one guy out of hundreds might have said is irrelevant, yoy brain >>>> dead, delusional, idiot. >>> >>> Not quite because one clearly bogus story puts the doubt on all of them >>> especially since there was more debris from a jet by the Heliport than >>> there >>> was by the big hole in the wall. >> >> that makes no sense at all. >> > > It does to him, but turning this 'logic' on him means all his claims are > in doubt. Are you saying you have evidence that a 757 can fold it's wings back to go into a little hole and not lose any engines either? <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 16:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q149bc-taf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517631 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Are you saying you have evidence that a 757 can fold it's wings back to go > into a little hole and not lose any engines either? <G> No one but a delusional kook talks about folding wings, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 19:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrstnl$bd9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517631 |
On 29/08/2015 16:10, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:mrrqmd$a1g$1@dont-email.me... >> On 29/08/2015 01:55, gilber34 wrote: >>> On 8/28/2015 6:28 PM, Rocky wrote: >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:vav6bc-u88.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> What is more inportant than the fact Mike Walter changed his story >>>>>> is why >>>>>> he >>>>>> changed his story. >>>>> >>>>> What one guy out of hundreds might have said is irrelevant, yoy brain >>>>> dead, delusional, idiot. >>>> >>>> Not quite because one clearly bogus story puts the doubt on all of them >>>> especially since there was more debris from a jet by the Heliport than >>>> there >>>> was by the big hole in the wall. >>> >>> that makes no sense at all. >>> >> >> It does to him, but turning this 'logic' on him means all his claims are >> in doubt. > > Are you saying you have evidence that a 757 can fold it's wings back to go > into a little hole and not lose any engines either? <G> > > Rocky sheeple > > Diversion tactic noted. Why would I have evidence of such an event? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web