Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #519762 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-13 05:41 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 202 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 11:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 12:44 -0400
Re: Rocky has no clue about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 18:26 +0000
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 20:08 +0100
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 19:46 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:11 -0500
Re: Rocky is shooken jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:19 +0000
Re: Rocky is shooken Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 16:38 -0500
Re: Rocky is shooken jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:48 +0000
Re: Rocky is shooken Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 21:32 -0500
Re: Rocky is shooken benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 22:39 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 06:06 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 07:17 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 10:53 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 08:08 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken "Chad Fistpumper" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-09 17:50 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:21 -0700
Re: Rocky is shooken benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 19:30 -0400
Re: Rocky is shooken Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:10 -0700
Re: die ass hat spammer, die jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 03:34 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:29 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-09 00:00 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 02:13 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Tony the heckler ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-09 02:03 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 17:22 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 18:16 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 03:54 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 07:05 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( More for Mike the brainless ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:43 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 23:36 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 10:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael is lacking proof to go with his mikeshit 3 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-09 17:23 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-10 18:06 +1000
Re: Plane truth HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 07:39 -0400
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 20:58 +0100
Re: Plane truth george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> - 2015-09-11 08:14 +1200
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-10 16:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-10 23:03 +0100
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 19:51 +0100
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 15:45 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 16:20 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 16:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:21 -0400
Re: Plane truth Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 16:48 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 23:09 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 16:15 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 13:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-09 18:31 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:28 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:42 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 04:21 +0000
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-10 08:59 -0400
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-10 13:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 18:37 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:03 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-20 05:21 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 10:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-20 19:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:29 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 01:42 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 22:11 -0500
Re: Plane truth moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 05:06 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 14:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:38 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:21 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:51 -0500
Re: Plane truth (Wow Michael found an interesting link ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:30 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 21:05 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( WTC Core Columns Turn To Dust? ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:40 -0500
Re: Plane truth Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-10 10:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-11 09:34 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:34 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:54 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 18:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-13 07:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid is caught lying again ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:32 -0500
Re: Plane truth (More proof, if any were needed, that Roger is mentally ill) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:47 -0500
edtiem subjectum noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 14:37 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 15:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 17:03 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 17:36 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-09 12:29 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 09:05 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 12:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:09 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:53 -0400
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 13:09 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 17:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:47 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-12 23:16 -0400
Re: Ignorance of aircraft jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:30 +0000
Re: Ignorance of aircraft BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:10 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:16 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-13 10:11 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 09:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:46 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:10 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Roger is not mentally able to answer questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:20 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 01:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:25 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:14 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:56 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:31 +0200
Re: delusions about airplanes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:26 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 19:27 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 20:35 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 07:55 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 11:14 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:48 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 14:33 -0500
Re: Rocky's ignorance jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:52 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Kid 9/12/15 ) ( Kid can not quote NIST ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:21 -0500
Re: Rocky babbles on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:32 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:26 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the Ediot ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 09:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:22 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 02:17 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael stilll thinks he is super smart but he is a nobody ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:31 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( rep to the T-Annoy ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 22:16 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:20 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:33 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 05:57 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 15:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:02 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 21:35 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:35 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 17:32 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:23 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:31 -0400
Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon + Sarah's new last name) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:39 -0500
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 22:51 +0000
Re: Rocky runs Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-13 19:09 -0400
Re: Rocky runs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 18:54 -0500
Re: Imaginary missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 00:29 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 09:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 17:07 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 12:25 -0500
Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 17:58 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-14 22:05 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 17:40 -0500
Re: Rocky is really stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:11 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:45 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Rocky still stupid jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 23:40 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:46 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-15 01:45 +0000
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 21:24 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 04:12 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:46 +0200
Re: Plane truth ( Michael proves he is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-15 06:40 +0100
Re: Plane truth ( To the Ediot there were no hijacked jets on 9/11) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 05:49 +0200
Re: Phantom missiles jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:35 +0000
Re: Phantom missiles "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-13 10:56 -0700
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:38 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:01 -0400
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:06 -0500
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:41 -0500
Re: Plane truth Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 20:02 -0400
Re: More Rocky fantasy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 21:13 +0000
Re: More Rocky fantasy Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-08 23:17 +0100
Re: More Rocky fantasy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 22:59 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 18:36 -0500
Re: Plane truth jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 00:12 +0000
Re: Plane truth "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-12 20:56 -0400
Re: Plane truth Sarah Czepiel <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-12 23:03 -0400
Re: Plane delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:39 +0000
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 20:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 21:13 -0500
Re: Plane truth ( Kid Wills proves he has never flown remote controlled airplanes + napalm ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:00 -0500
Re: more delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 05:41 +0000
Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11 Next page →
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-08 17:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <msnk9s$nj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #519825 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:55:04 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >> news:gleuualfua2nhia16n6soqvntrfmg0v24d@4ax.com... >>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:30:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because you forgot to notice that neither of the bogus jets >>>> in Nuke York City >>> >>> You've run away from these questions for quite some time, Roger. >>> >>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 175 ? Two of whom were >>> from my son's alma mater. >>> >>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 77 ? You remember Barbara >>> Olson? Did she just say "poof " and disappear? >> >> If you listen to the video I gave you earlier > > I asked a simple question. You've maintained there were no planes. > > In your own words, what happened to the passengers? > > What happened to Barbara Olsen? > > What happened to David Angell? How the hell are we supposed to know ? Call them and ask them where they are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-08 19:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <katuua126jjmeb7i2u7aih2qgc7sker89d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #519839 |
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:36:37 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:55:04 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>> news:gleuualfua2nhia16n6soqvntrfmg0v24d@4ax.com... >>>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:30:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO because you forgot to notice that neither of the bogus jets >>>>> in Nuke York City >>>> >>>> You've run away from these questions for quite some time, Roger. >>>> >>>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 175 ? Two of whom were >>>> from my son's alma mater. >>>> >>>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 77 ? You remember Barbara >>>> Olson? Did she just say "poof " and disappear? >>> >>> If you listen to the video I gave you earlier >> >> I asked a simple question. You've maintained there were no planes. >> >> In your own words, what happened to the passengers? >> >> What happened to Barbara Olsen? >> >> What happened to David Angell? > > > > >How the hell are we supposed to know ? They were on the planes that crashed into the Pentagon and the WTC on 9/11. Where are they if those planes didn't do exactly as we saw on TV worldwide? >Call them and ask them where they are. Alright, you're a waste of time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-09 12:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mspmlu$26r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #519874 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:36:37 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:55:04 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>> news:gleuualfua2nhia16n6soqvntrfmg0v24d@4ax.com... >>>>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:30:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you forgot to notice that neither of the bogus >>>>>> jets in Nuke York City >>>>> >>>>> You've run away from these questions for quite some time, Roger. >>>>> >>>>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 175 ? Two of whom were >>>>> from my son's alma mater. >>>>> >>>>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 77 ? You remember Barbara >>>>> Olson? Did she just say "poof " and disappear? >>>> >>>> If you listen to the video I gave you earlier >>> >>> I asked a simple question. You've maintained there were no planes. >>> >>> In your own words, what happened to the passengers? >>> >>> What happened to Barbara Olsen? >>> >>> What happened to David Angell? >> >> >> >> >> How the hell are we supposed to know ? > > They were on the planes that crashed into the Pentagon and the WTC on > 9/11. > > Where are they if those planes didn't do exactly as we saw on TV > worldwide? > > >> Call them and ask them where they are. > > Alright, you're a waste of time. You didn't ask about Santa. ...He's at the North pole.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 09:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bLGdnYFmC-ioQm_InZ2dnUU7-eGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #519976 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mspmlu$26r$1@dont-email.me... > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:36:37 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:55:04 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:gleuualfua2nhia16n6soqvntrfmg0v24d@4ax.com... >>>>>> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 11:30:16 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> ROTFLMAO because you forgot to notice that neither of the bogus >>>>>>> jets in Nuke York City >>>>>> >>>>>> You've run away from these questions for quite some time, Roger. >>>>>> >>>>>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 175 ? Two of whom were >>>>>> from my son's alma mater. >>>>>> >>>>>> What happened to the passengers on Flight 77 ? You remember Barbara >>>>>> Olson? Did she just say "poof " and disappear? >>>>> >>>>> If you listen to the video I gave you earlier >>>> >>>> I asked a simple question. You've maintained there were no planes. >>>> >>>> In your own words, what happened to the passengers? >>>> >>>> What happened to Barbara Olsen? >>>> >>>> What happened to David Angell? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> How the hell are we supposed to know ? >> >> They were on the planes that crashed into the Pentagon and the WTC on >> 9/11. >> >> Where are they if those planes didn't do exactly as we saw on TV >> worldwide? >> >> >>> Call them and ask them where they are. >> >> Alright, you're a waste of time. > > > > > > > You didn't ask about Santa. > > ...He's at the North pole. Obviously Sarah does not appreciate someone with good humor and brains. BTW if Sarah's hubby saw Flight 77 then he has probably seen Santa too. And I'm inclined to think that he saw Santa ram the Pentagon since Sarah will not tell anybody what her husband really saw. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 12:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <aa06vahah9cj5c4pfvgcjkoe59i3o5f5jq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #520290 |
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:05:51 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >BTW if Sarah's hubby saw Flight 77 No "f" Roger. I see you agree the location of the Pentagon's helipad on 9/11 was right next to the entry hole of Flight 77.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 15:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <PIidnRuKDYioqG7InZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520322 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:aa06vahah9cj5c4pfvgcjkoe59i3o5f5jq@4ax.com... > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:05:51 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>BTW if Sarah's hubby saw Flight 77 > > No "f" Roger. > > I see you agree the location of the Pentagon's helipad on 9/11 was right > next to the entry hole of Flight 77. The only problem is the small white jet that crashed at the heliport was it never made a hole in the Pentagon. And the hole in the Pentagon was lacking debris but it certainly had it's share of smoke generators. See: 9/11 Pentagon Special Effects - Jim Fetzer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKKZY2zpYiU 9/11 wasn't just a lie it was a complete phy-op designed to get you to stop thinking for yourself and that is exactly what it did for you. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-11 18:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <gpm6vah7v8173ss5ofv9g810gt8hn1iftd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #520370 |
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:09:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:aa06vahah9cj5c4pfvgcjkoe59i3o5f5jq@4ax.com... >> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:05:51 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>BTW if Sarah's hubby saw Flight 77 >> >> No "f" Roger. >> >> I see you agree the location of the Pentagon's helipad on 9/11 was right >> next to the entry hole of Flight 77. > >The only problem is the small white jet that crashed at the heliport There was no small white jet. Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 13:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mt1m4u$5l5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #520400 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:09:26 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >> news:aa06vahah9cj5c4pfvgcjkoe59i3o5f5jq@4ax.com... >>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:05:51 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> BTW if Sarah's hubby saw Flight 77 >>> >>> No "f" Roger. >>> >>> I see you agree the location of the Pentagon's helipad on 9/11 was >>> right next to the entry hole of Flight 77. >> >> The only problem is the small white jet that crashed at the heliport > > There was no small white jet. > > Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? Everyone. ...Except YOU, of course.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 17:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #520496 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? >Everyone. >...Except YOU, of course. Missile type and platform then?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 17:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <Tu-dnbtfV7iTM2nInZ2dnUU7-LudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520543 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:bu79va12pe89s58tvakmm3gioapnoodf29@4ax.com... > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:09:28 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >>> Which one of you kooks is claiming it was a missile? > >>Everyone. >>...Except YOU, of course. > > Missile type and platform then? See the following video and start it at 25:25. Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] ( indexed to start at 25:25 ) https://youtu.be/Lec9giab90I?t=25m25s A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the type of missile used didn't have a problem. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 00:11 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <uhrecc-dug.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #520549 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but the > type of missile used didn't have a problem. Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground delusional fuckwit? Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, delusional fuckwit? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:47 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <mt2gvj$6km$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #520562 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but >> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. > > Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground > delusional fuckwit? > > Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, > delusional fuckwit? Wait a second ???? Which side are you arguing for ? As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 20:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #520567 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but
>>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem.
>>
>> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground
>> delusional fuckwit?
>>
>> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent,
>> delusional fuckwit?
>
>
>
>
>
>Wait a second ????
>Which side are you arguing for ?
>
>As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement.
Bwahahahahahaha!
You honestly got me to laugh at that.
>Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be
>controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering
>debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon.
Nowhere does Jim offer such a claim.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 23:16 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.305eb48115c3fe498c298@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520572 |
In article <ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > > >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> > >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but > >>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. > >> > >> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground > >> delusional fuckwit? > >> > >> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, > >> delusional fuckwit? > > > > > > > > > > > >Wait a second ???? > >Which side are you arguing for ? > > > >As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. > > Bwahahahahahaha! > You honestly got me to laugh at that. Yeah, that was funny. And the best part is, she has no idea why it's so funny. > > >Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be > >controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering > >debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon. > > Nowhere does Jim offer such a claim. Just goes to show how delusional she is. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 05:30 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Ignorance of aircraft |
| Message-ID | <f8efcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #520608 |
In sci.physics BDK <Control@worldcontrol.com> wrote: > In article <ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com>, > compuelf@gmail.com says... >> >> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >> >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but >> >>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. >> >> >> >> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground >> >> delusional fuckwit? >> >> >> >> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, >> >> delusional fuckwit? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >Wait a second ???? >> >Which side are you arguing for ? >> > >> >As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. >> >> Bwahahahahahaha! >> You honestly got me to laugh at that. > > Yeah, that was funny. And the best part is, she has no idea why it's so > funny. > >> >> >Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be >> >controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering >> >debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon. >> >> Nowhere does Jim offer such a claim. > > Just goes to show how delusional she is. Yet another ignorant fuckwit chimes in to display his boundless stupidity. Ground effect has no effect on aircraft controllablility, fuckwit, and most airplanes are in ground effect during takeoff and landing. The only thing that keeps airplanes from flying very close to the ground is the common sense of the pilot. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 10:10 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Ignorance of aircraft |
| Message-ID | <MPG.305f4de5588ad4e098c299@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520620 |
In article <f8efcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics BDK <Control@worldcontrol.com> wrote: > > In article <ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com>, > > compuelf@gmail.com says... > >> > >> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but > >> >>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. > >> >> > >> >> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground > >> >> delusional fuckwit? > >> >> > >> >> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, > >> >> delusional fuckwit? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >Wait a second ???? > >> >Which side are you arguing for ? > >> > > >> >As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. > >> > >> Bwahahahahahaha! > >> You honestly got me to laugh at that. > > > > Yeah, that was funny. And the best part is, she has no idea why it's so > > funny. > > > >> > >> >Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be > >> >controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering > >> >debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon. > >> > >> Nowhere does Jim offer such a claim. > > > > Just goes to show how delusional she is. > > Yet another ignorant fuckwit chimes in to display his boundless stupidity. Um, you know I was posting about Bast, right? As far as I know, Bast is a female. > > Ground effect has no effect on aircraft controllablility, fuckwit, > and most airplanes are in ground effect during takeoff and landing. Neither of us agree with Bast and her nonsense. > > The only thing that keeps airplanes from flying very close to the > ground is the common sense of the pilot. > The Troofers think it's magic. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 09:16 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <3YidnebQfsb0GGjInZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520676 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.305f4de5588ad4e098c299@news.giganews.com... > In article <f8efcc-6pi.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > says... >> Yet another ignorant fuckwit chimes in to display his boundless >> stupidity. > > Um, you know I was posting about Bast, right? As far as I know, Bast is > a female. Oh gee, something that BKD and I finally agree on. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 08:01 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <rssava1dc8sec02gscpceokpm8gm04i9ja@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #520608 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 23:16:08 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com>,
>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but
>> >>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem.
>> >>
>> >> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground
>> >> delusional fuckwit?
>> >>
>> >> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent,
>> >> delusional fuckwit?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Wait a second ????
>> >Which side are you arguing for ?
>> >
>> >As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement.
>>
>> Bwahahahahahaha!
>> You honestly got me to laugh at that.
>
>Yeah, that was funny. And the best part is, she has no idea why it's so
>funny.
>
Even if s/he does understand on an intellectual level, being able
to admit why it's funny will be impossible for Bast.
>> >Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be
>> >controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering
>> >debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon.
>>
>> Nowhere does Jim offer such a claim.
>
>Just goes to show how delusional she is.
Kind of sad, really. While Bast's posts are very entertaining,
and fascinating from a standpoint of clinical psychology, it's sad
that s/he is so unable to accept the truth.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 10:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon ) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.305f4e262ff4948298c29a@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520664 |
In article <rssava1dc8sec02gscpceokpm8gm04i9ja@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 23:16:08 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > >In article <ecj9vatakdgaad972pg2ftqaqf7j48ifb4@4ax.com>, > >compuelf@gmail.com says... > >> > >> On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 20:47:31 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> A commercial jet could not have hit the Pentagon at ground level but > >> >>> the type of missile used didn't have a problem. > >> >> > >> >> Is that because commercial jets are always floating above the ground > >> >> delusional fuckwit? > >> >> > >> >> Or is it that commercial jets have some sort of ground repelent, > >> >> delusional fuckwit? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >Wait a second ???? > >> >Which side are you arguing for ? > >> > > >> >As you are making a darn good point supporting the 9/11 truth movement. > >> > >> Bwahahahahahaha! > >> You honestly got me to laugh at that. > > > >Yeah, that was funny. And the best part is, she has no idea why it's so > >funny. > > > > Even if s/he does understand on an intellectual level, being able > to admit why it's funny will be impossible for Bast. > > >> >Since you are correct that any large commercial passenger jet could never be > >> >controllable because of "ground effect", and would have crashed, scattering > >> >debis everywhere, long before it ever got near the pentagon. > >> > >> Nowhere does Jim offer such a claim. > > > >Just goes to show how delusional she is. > > Kind of sad, really. While Bast's posts are very entertaining, > and fascinating from a standpoint of clinical psychology, it's sad > that s/he is so unable to accept the truth. All I know is her anger makes me laugh. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 09:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Plane truth ( missle used on the Pentagon 2 Kid ) |
| Message-ID | <u9adnedIBsJ4GmjInZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520664 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:rssava1dc8sec02gscpceokpm8gm04i9ja@4ax.com... > > Kind of sad, really. While Bast's posts are very entertaining, > and fascinating from a standpoint of clinical psychology, it's sad > that s/he is so unable to accept the truth. The truth is there is no hard evidence that ties a 757 to the Pentagon or Pranksville, PA. It was all smoke (generators) and mirrors (CGIs or BS ) and do not forget to this very date you have not been able to explain why there were survivors in the North Tower and why both the Twin Towers resemble a Nuclear Controlled Demolition. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web