Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #518743 > unrolled thread

Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-09-03 13:05 -0700
    Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 13:14 -0700
    Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:28 -0500
      Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 20:34 +0000
      Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-09-03 15:29 -0700
        Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:47 -0700
          Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-09-04 17:22 -0700
        Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 18:05 -0500
          Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 00:58 -0400
      Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 01:19 -0400
    Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:40 -0400
      Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 13:49 -0700
        Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 17:09 -0400
          Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-03 17:31 -0700
          Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 01:15 -0400
            Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 06:24 -0400

#518743 — Re: Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change

On Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 10:15:26 AM UTC-7, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
> Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change
> 
> Tuesday, September 1, 2015
> 
> http://dailysignal.com/2015/09/01/obama-is-ignoring-the-science-on-climate-change/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=thftwitter
> 
> Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> Om Shanti
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj


Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the coming ice age!

Double-A

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#518745

On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 10:05:13 PM UTC+2, Double-A wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 10:15:26 AM UTC-7, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
> > Obama Is Ignoring the Science on Climate Change
> > 
> > Tuesday, September 1, 2015
> > 
> > http://dailysignal.com/2015/09/01/obama-is-ignoring-the-science-on-climate-change/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=thftwitter
> > 
> > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > Om Shanti
> > 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
> 
> 
> Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the coming ice age!
> 
> Double-A

wherever there is A progress in reverse direction of sliding/rotating is the digression. and these two are properties of spiral that is unable to close one holy completeness in a way ellipse does it. in such environment there's always struggle nothing is and can ever be enough both for the those progressing and those digressing. no interior and no exterior can be known. no conservation laws can be applied. in my book it is THE DAYS OF THE LONGEST LASTING DOOM. 

VaseDOOM27 DOOM !!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518746

On 9/3/15 3:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
> Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the coming ice age!
>
> Double-A

   We will more than likely be extinct before the earth enters another
   ice age.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518752

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/3/15 3:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
>> Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the coming ice age!
>>
>> Double-A
> 
>   We will more than likely be extinct before the earth enters another
>   ice age.

From what exactly, you spamming piece of shit?
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518790

On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 1:28:48 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 9/3/15 3:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
> > Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the coming ice age!
> >
> > Double-A
> 
>    We will more than likely be extinct before the earth enters another
>    ice age.


Could come sooner than you think.  Look for crop failures due to cold weather in spring.

Double-A

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518796

On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 3:29:54 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
> On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 1:28:48 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > On 9/3/15 3:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
> > > Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the coming ice age!
> > >
> > > Double-A
> > 
> >    We will more than likely be extinct before the earth enters another
> >    ice age.
> 
> 
> Could come sooner than you think.  Look for crop failures due to cold weather in spring.
> 
> Double-A

AA Mt.Baldy needs snow.Its streams are dry.I have to go back up.Reason everyone wants Baldy lucky nuggets. I get 10% of their lotto winnings O ya  Bert

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519012

On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 3:47:50 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 3:29:54 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 1:28:48 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > > On 9/3/15 3:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
> > > > Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the coming ice age!
> > > >
> > > > Double-A
> > > 
> > >    We will more than likely be extinct before the earth enters another
> > >    ice age.
> > 
> > 
> > Could come sooner than you think.  Look for crop failures due to cold weather in spring.
> > 
> > Double-A
> 
> AA Mt.Baldy needs snow.Its streams are dry.I have to go back up.Reason everyone wants Baldy lucky nuggets. I get 10% of their lotto winnings O ya  Bert


When the snow returns to Mt. Baldy, you will know the current age of global warmth has ended.  Before that happens, maybe Obama can think of a better name for it.

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518800

On 9/3/15 5:29 PM, Double-A wrote:
> On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 1:28:48 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> On 9/3/15 3:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
>>> Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the coming ice age!
>>>
>>> Double-A
>>
>>     We will more than likely be extinct before the earth enters another
>>     ice age.
>
>
> Could come sooner than you think.  Look for crop failures due to cold weather in spring.
>
> Double-A
>

   I'll keep my eyes open.. You do know the difference between weather
   and climate, right?  Climate involves weather pattern over periods of
   30 years and longer.

> http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Climate/BER2014-1.png



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518838

On 09/03/2015 07:05 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 9/3/15 5:29 PM, Double-A wrote:
>> On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 1:28:48 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>> On 9/3/15 3:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
>>>> Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with
>>>> the coming ice age!
>>>>
>>>> Double-A
>>>
>>>     We will more than likely be extinct before the earth enters another
>>>     ice age.
>>
>>
>> Could come sooner than you think.  Look for crop failures due to cold
>> weather in spring.
>>
>> Double-A
>>
>
>    I'll keep my eyes open.. You do know the difference between weather
>    and climate, right?  Climate involves weather pattern over periods of
>    30 years and longer.
>
>> http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Climate/BER2014-1.png

Gosh Sam, the longer the world temperature is no longer warming the 
longer and longer your period for "climate" gets. Back when there was 
still "global warming" you used to insist that it was 10 years. Now it's 
30 (as the so-called "pause" is heading for 20 years). Sam, lies and 
misinformation and instability have no place in science. Just as you 
have no credibility in science. Herb's theory of "Heavy Air" has more 
credibility than your unthinking screed!

-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518844

On 09/03/2015 04:28 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 9/3/15 3:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
>> Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the
>> coming ice age!
>>
>> Double-A
>
>    We will more than likely be extinct before the earth enters another
>    ice age.

Your groupies back in the 70's didn't think so. Oh, I forgot. In your 
world science is determined by "consensus" rather than data.



-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518750

On 9/3/2015 4:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
>
> Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the coming ice age!


We should ALL be focused on reducing pollution levels. To think anything 
else is to be a fool.


-- 
"Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518753

On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 10:40:05 PM UTC+2, HVAC wrote:
> On 9/3/2015 4:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
> >
> > Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the coming ice age!
> 
> 
> We should ALL be focused on reducing pollution levels. To think anything 
> else is to be a fool.
> 
> 
> -- 
> "Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
> https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

thermodynamic principles say every machine especial the human worker as a machine for brown stuff production (E isa WC^2) is p-mobile waste maker. so how do we reduce pollution: sit still and do nothing. the entropy vs enthalpy ??? humans are convinced that if you sit still and do nothing the degree of disorder increases... no, no, no... the way that humans arrange the environment opposite to how nature does it that is increasing disorder; when things are left in natural hands they come in order very soon, even sooner than humanity can ever disorder them again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518757

On 9/3/2015 4:49 PM, dobri karagorgov wrote:
> On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 10:40:05 PM UTC+2, HVAC wrote:
>> On 9/3/2015 4:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
>>>
>>> Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with the coming ice age!
>>
>>
>> We should ALL be focused on reducing pollution levels. To think anything
>> else is to be a fool.
>>
>
> thermodynamic principles say every machine especial the human worker
> as a machine for brown stuff production (E isa WC^2) is p-mobile waste
> maker. so how do we reduce pollution: sit still and do nothing. the
> entropy vs enthalpy ??? humans are convinced that if you sit still and
> do nothing the degree of disorder increases... no, no, no... the way
> that humans arrange the environment opposite to how nature does it that
> is increasing disorder; when things are left in natural hands they come
> in order very soon, even sooner than humanity can ever disorder them again.


Here in the USA and most of the west, the cleanup efforts of our air and 
water has reaped huge gains since the 60s and 70s. Continue on with 
this. Wastewater treatment. Mandatory scrubbers on power generation 
plants. These have made dramatic changes. Raise awareness of the 
population. Build 50 new nuclear power plants over the next 20 years.
Keep building and developing wind and solar power. We have made great 
strides and should continue.

People seem to want to turn this into a political battle, but it's not.
It's a human battle. We all live here. Let's just live here smarter.


-- 
"Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518820

"HVAC"  wrote in message news:msacol$udg$1@dont-email.me...

On 9/3/2015 4:49 PM, dobri karagorgov wrote:
> On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 10:40:05 PM UTC+2, HVAC wrote:
>> On 9/3/2015 4:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
>>>
>>> Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with 
>>> the coming ice age!
>>
>>
>> We should ALL be focused on reducing pollution levels. To think 
>> anything
>> else is to be a fool.
>>
>
> thermodynamic principles say every machine especial the human worker
> as a machine for brown stuff production (E isa WC^2) is p-mobile 
> waste
> maker. so how do we reduce pollution: sit still and do nothing. the
> entropy vs enthalpy ??? humans are convinced that if you sit still 
> and
> do nothing the degree of disorder increases... no, no, no... the way
> that humans arrange the environment opposite to how nature does it 
> that
> is increasing disorder; when things are left in natural hands they 
> come
> in order very soon, even sooner than humanity can ever disorder them 
> again.


Here in the USA and most of the west, the cleanup efforts of our air 
and
water has reaped huge gains since the 60s and 70s. Continue on with
this. Wastewater treatment. Mandatory scrubbers on power generation
plants. These have made dramatic changes. Raise awareness of the
population. Build 50 new nuclear power plants over the next 20 years.
Keep building and developing wind and solar power. We have made great
strides and should continue.

People seem to want to turn this into a political battle, but it's 
not.
It's a human battle. We all live here. Let's just live here smarter.


*** I don't think we'll get a handle on any of that Climate Change
until the whole World is in agreement that #1 ... it is real and #2 
...
that there is irrefutable evidence.
Every single day somewhere on this Earth is it the hottest day ever
and the coldest day ever ... just never in the same geographic 
location.

When the Chinks and the Dot-heads stop putting a coal-fired
a power plant on line each and every week, perhaps I can be
persuaded to take this incessant Liberal whining of impending
doom somewhat serious,

A good start to clean up the mess would be to make abortion
mandatory for anyone on public assistance, and retro-active
in the case of the sniveling Liberal contingent. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518842

On 09/03/2015 05:09 PM, HVAC wrote:
> On 9/3/2015 4:49 PM, dobri karagorgov wrote:
>> On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 10:40:05 PM UTC+2, HVAC wrote:
>>> On 9/3/2015 4:05 PM, Double-A wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Instead of global warming, Obama should be concerning himself with
>>>> the coming ice age!
>>>
>>>
>>> We should ALL be focused on reducing pollution levels. To think anything
>>> else is to be a fool.
>>>
>>
>> thermodynamic principles say every machine especial the human worker
>> as a machine for brown stuff production (E isa WC^2) is p-mobile waste
>> maker. so how do we reduce pollution: sit still and do nothing. the
>> entropy vs enthalpy ??? humans are convinced that if you sit still and
>> do nothing the degree of disorder increases... no, no, no... the way
>> that humans arrange the environment opposite to how nature does it that
>> is increasing disorder; when things are left in natural hands they come
>> in order very soon, even sooner than humanity can ever disorder them
>> again.
>
>
> Here in the USA and most of the west, the cleanup efforts of our air and
> water has reaped huge gains since the 60s and 70s. Continue on with
> this. Wastewater treatment. Mandatory scrubbers on power generation
> plants. These have made dramatic changes. Raise awareness of the
> population. Build 50 new nuclear power plants over the next 20 years.
> Keep building and developing wind and solar power. We have made great
> strides and should continue.
>
> People seem to want to turn this into a political battle, but it's not.
> It's a human battle. We all live here. Let's just live here smarter.

HVAC has hit the nail right on the head here. There are LOTS of crap 
that has been cleaned up and even more that NEEDS cleaned up. This is 
why Greens are so destructive. They hate nuclear power which is the ONLY 
current viable source for civilization level power that produces minimal 
waste (And the way to deal with nuclear waste is to find a useless area 
and ship it there. It's not that big a volume of stuff. My vote is for 
Alabama). And even worse Greenies and politicians lusting after that 
trillion dollar a year energy tax, are trying to sell the lie that 
fossil fuels, and CO2 in particular are causing the climate to change. 
This is a huge lie and really incompetent science being sold to a 
gullible public.

Fact is that clean-up that has been done has been quite effective (For 
example the way Lake Erie bounced back from "dead") So to take a bunch 
of tax money and NOT spend it on further clean up of air, water, earth, 
oceans etc. but to just waste it on Third World leaders to "say we are 
sorry" is criminal beyond imagination.

HVAC says let us all live smarter. Greenies say, "Let us live like kings 
until the whole system crashes due to our fucking it up. To hell with 
everybody else."

-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#518866

On 9/4/2015 1:15 AM, benj wrote:
>
>> Here in the USA and most of the west, the cleanup efforts of our air and
>> water has reaped huge gains since the 60s and 70s. Continue on with
>> this. Wastewater treatment. Mandatory scrubbers on power generation
>> plants. These have made dramatic changes. Raise awareness of the
>> population. Build 50 new nuclear power plants over the next 20 years.
>> Keep building and developing wind and solar power. We have made great
>> strides and should continue.
>>
>> People seem to want to turn this into a political battle, but it's not.
>> It's a human battle. We all live here. Let's just live here smarter.
>
> HVAC has hit the nail right on the head here.


BJ agrees with me? Surely this is a sign of the EndTimes(tm)


PS- I know, I know, "Don't call me Shirley".


-- 
"Are we going to fight or are we going to stand around all day?"
https://goo.gl/TU0Xr6

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web