Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #611407 > unrolled thread

Re: Any News on Juno ?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Any News on Juno ? Yuri Kretin <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2017-01-02 19:13 -0600
    Re: Any News on Juno ? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 08:03 -0800
      Re: Any News on Juno ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-03 18:23 -0500
        Re: Any News on Juno ? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-01-03 23:41 +0000
          Re: Any News on Juno ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-01-03 19:09 -0500
            Re: Any News on Juno ? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-01-04 00:34 +0000
            Re: Any News on Juno ? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 09:29 -0800
              Re: Any News on Juno ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 11:35 -0600
                Re: Any News on Juno ? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 12:54 -0800
                  Re: Any News on Juno ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 15:03 -0600
                    Re: Any News on Juno ? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 13:23 -0800
                      Re: Any News on Juno ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 15:40 -0600
                        Re: Any News on Juno ? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 19:11 -0800
                          Re: Any News on Juno ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-05 05:49 +0000
                          Re: Any News on Juno ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 09:11 -0600
                        Re: Any News on Juno ? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 13:34 -0800
    Re: Any News on Juno ? edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-01-03 08:15 -0800
      Re: Any News on Juno ? Yuri Kretin <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2017-01-03 11:12 -0600

#611407 — Re: Any News on Juno ?

On 12/11/2016 7:04 PM, Yuri Kreaton wrote:
> POCA was at noon EST today, did it fry, die, or do OK ?
>
>
>
>
>

any PICTURES or Clips yet ?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#611486

I guess there's nothing to see, there.
Definitely no alien shit

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611561

On 1/3/2017 11:03 AM, john wrote:
> I guess there's nothing to see, there.
> Definitely no alien shit
>
Hey John.

Did you know that the Stargate project did a "remote viewing" of Jupiter 
BEFORE any probe was sent there?  The "viewing" revealed that the planet 
had a RING! At the time I'm sure Chimp would have said that this was 
totally nuts and impossible. Later probes confirmed it. Now chimp will 
say everybody knows Jupiter has a ring. ESP has always been proven a 
fraud after the fact.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611572

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 1/3/2017 11:03 AM, john wrote:
>> I guess there's nothing to see, there.
>> Definitely no alien shit
>>
> Hey John.
> 
> Did you know that the Stargate project did a "remote viewing" of Jupiter 
> BEFORE any probe was sent there?  The "viewing" revealed that the planet 
> had a RING! At the time I'm sure Chimp would have said that this was 
> totally nuts and impossible. Later probes confirmed it. Now chimp will 
> say everybody knows Jupiter has a ring. ESP has always been proven a 
> fraud after the fact.

Benj has admitted to being a troll posting kook nonsense just to get a
rise out of people.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611578

On 1/3/2017 6:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 1/3/2017 11:03 AM, john wrote:
>>> I guess there's nothing to see, there.
>>> Definitely no alien shit
>>>
>> Hey John.
>>
>> Did you know that the Stargate project did a "remote viewing" of Jupiter
>> BEFORE any probe was sent there?  The "viewing" revealed that the planet
>> had a RING! At the time I'm sure Chimp would have said that this was
>> totally nuts and impossible. Later probes confirmed it. Now chimp will
>> say everybody knows Jupiter has a ring. ESP has always been proven a
>> fraud after the fact.
>
> Benj has admitted to being a troll posting kook nonsense just to get a
> rise out of people.

As usual Chimp has no clue as to what is truth and what is
troll. If you did a bit  more research before opening your yap it would 
be better. At least HVAC KNOWS when he is lying.

So Mr. Chimp. DOES JUPITER HAVE A RING?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611587

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 1/3/2017 6:41 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 1/3/2017 11:03 AM, john wrote:
>>>> I guess there's nothing to see, there.
>>>> Definitely no alien shit
>>>>
>>> Hey John.
>>>
>>> Did you know that the Stargate project did a "remote viewing" of Jupiter
>>> BEFORE any probe was sent there?  The "viewing" revealed that the planet
>>> had a RING! At the time I'm sure Chimp would have said that this was
>>> totally nuts and impossible. Later probes confirmed it. Now chimp will
>>> say everybody knows Jupiter has a ring. ESP has always been proven a
>>> fraud after the fact.
>>
>> Benj has admitted to being a troll posting kook nonsense just to get a
>> rise out of people.
> 
> As usual Chimp has no clue as to what is truth and what is
> troll. If you did a bit  more research before opening your yap it would 
> be better. At least HVAC KNOWS when he is lying.

You have admitted to being a troll posting kook nonsense and lies just to
get a rise out of people.

<snip troll nonsense>

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611662

benj
If the Red Spot represents Jupiter's
magnetic pole, then perhaps 
it is close enough to the
equator to cause the ring.
In which case, Saturn's magnetic North
pole must be smack dab right ON
the equator.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611664

On 1/4/2017 11:29 AM, john wrote:
> benj
> If the Red Spot represents Jupiter's
> magnetic pole, then perhaps
> it is close enough to the
> equator to cause the ring.
> In which case, Saturn's magnetic North
> pole must be smack dab right ON
> the equator.
>

Auroras are exhibited near the magnetic poles of planets.
As you can see in the linked picture, the magnetic pole is nowhere near 
the red spot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetosphere_of_Jupiter#/media/File:Hubble_Captures_Vivid_Auroras_in_Jupiter%27s_Atmosphere.jpg

Dang, annoying DATA that shoots holes in such fun ideas.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611687

Odd
"Auroras are exhibited near the magnetic poles of planets. 
As you can see in the linked picture, the magnetic pole is nowhere near 
the red spot. "
Auroras aren't lightning discharges, are they?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611689

On 1/4/2017 2:54 PM, john wrote:
> Odd
> "Auroras are exhibited near the magnetic poles of planets.
> As you can see in the linked picture, the magnetic pole is nowhere near
> the red spot. "
> Auroras aren't lightning discharges, are they?
>

No, John, they're not. They are the glow of ionization caused by the 
influx of solar wind particles funneled by the planet's magnetic field 
lines toward the magnetic poles.

Is the aurora something you know nothing about?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611691

Odd
"Is the aurora something you know nothing about? "

I live in Canada.
What is pictured at Jupiters pole
looks nothing like an aurora.
Where is the South Jupiter aurora, then,
if there's one at the north?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611693

On 1/4/2017 3:23 PM, john wrote:
> Odd
> "Is the aurora something you know nothing about? "
>
> I live in Canada.
> What is pictured at Jupiters pole
> looks nothing like an aurora.

Oh, but it does.
Here's a picture of an aurora on Earth as seen from space:
http://www.livescience.com/images/i/000/041/053/original/diffuse-aurora-101020-02.jpg?interpolation=lanczos-none&fit=inside%7C660:*

Or are you claiming that NASA can't recognize an aurora when they see one?

> Where is the South Jupiter aurora, then,
> if there's one at the north?
>

It's there. It's just not in view in that picture.
Here's one that shows the aurora at both poles: 
http://www.windows2universe.org/jupiter/images/JupAur_small.gif
Here's another:
https://smd-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/science-green/s3fs-public/mnt/medialibrary/2007/03/29/29mar_bigauroras_resources/xray_auroras_strip.jpg

Damn, there's that DATA again, just shooting holes in perfectly fun ideas!!

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611709

Odd
So- if the North magnetic pole were  closer
to the equator- what would the magnetic 
field look like? It's a 10-hour PERIOD, so
wouldn't  the rotation of the planet shape
it to cause aurorae over the rotational
poles, anyway?
So, how have we excluded the Red Spot
being a collection of Fe over the
magnetic North Pole?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611723

john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Odd
>So- if the North magnetic pole were  closer
>to the equator- what would the magnetic 
>field look like?

It would rotate with the planet pretty much like spinning a bar magnet around.

> It's a 10-hour PERIOD, so
>wouldn't  the rotation of the planet shape
>it to cause aurorae over the rotational
>poles, anyway?

Aww shucks! Those damn facts ruined one of your beautiful ideas again!

>So, how have we excluded the Red Spot
>being a collection of Fe over the
>magnetic North Pole?

We don't see Jupiter acting like a rotating bar magnet. Instead its magnetic 
field is pretty much stationary as would be expected with the poles aligned.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611742

On 1/4/2017 9:11 PM, john wrote:
> Odd
> So- if the North magnetic pole were  closer
> to the equator- what would the magnetic
> field look like?

It would be rapidly changing, because then the magnetic pole would swing 
around once a Jupiter day.

> It's a 10-hour PERIOD, so
> wouldn't  the rotation of the planet shape
> it to cause aurorae over the rotational
> poles, anyway?

No. It helps to understand what causes auroras. Specifically, it helps 
to understand how the magnetosphere funnels charged particles toward the 
magnetic poles. In other words, it's useful for you to learn why the 
northern lights happen in the north.

> So, how have we excluded the Red Spot
> being a collection of Fe over the
> magnetic North Pole?
>

Since the magnetic north pole of Jupiter is known to be near the 
rotational axis, and since this is nowhere near the red spot, yes, that 
has been excluded. Keep in mind that Jupiter probes already sent have 
already done a mapping of Jupiter's magnetic field, so we have MEASURED 
where the magnetic pole is.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611804

excellent

> Here's another:
> https://smd-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/science-green/s3fs-public/mnt/medialibrary/2007/03/29/29mar_bigauroras_resources/xray_auroras_strip.jpg
> 
> Damn, there's that DATA again, just shooting holes in perfectly fun ideas!!
> 
> -- 
> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611487

On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 8:13:58 PM UTC-5, Yuri Kretin wrote:
> On 12/11/2016 7:04 PM, Yuri Kreaton wrote:
> > POCA was at noon EST today, did it fry, die, or do OK ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> any PICTURES or Clips yet ?

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/jupiter-s-7th-pearl
Says it was posted December 13th. I agree they can be awfully slow in updating their information.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611491

On 1/3/2017 10:15 AM, edprochak@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 8:13:58 PM UTC-5, Yuri Kretin wrote:
>> On 12/11/2016 7:04 PM, Yuri Kreaton wrote:
>>> POCA was at noon EST today, did it fry, die, or do OK ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> any PICTURES or Clips yet ?
>
> https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/jupiter-s-7th-pearl
> Says it was posted December 13th. I agree they can be awfully slow in updating their information.
>

seems all are wide field, no close ups.

the bit rate of the link is very slow.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web