Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #551777 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-09 11:47 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-02 17:03 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 40 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:47 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 15:23 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-02 08:50 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 08:57 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 09:17 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 17:47 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 10:10 -0800
23 zeroes in base_ten? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 10:44 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 12:49 -0600
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 11:02 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 13:19 -0600
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 19:22 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 11:54 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 20:15 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 12:40 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 23:46 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 15:51 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 00:10 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:21 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 00:46 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 08:53 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 10:47 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 11:16 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-04 14:04 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:11 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 22:34 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:00 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 23:07 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:29 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:51 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:54 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 00:22 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 16:43 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 00:52 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 18:03 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 03:24 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 19:32 -0800
cc = 1/em noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:14 -0800
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 19:21 +0000
Re: Earth's Atmosphere is a slight plasma; Extraterrestrial Electricity Explains how/why heavier H2O droplets stay suspended, not convection benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 17:03 -0500
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 08:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cb4f062e-e04b-4f56-b10c-ebd9ea6d0360@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #558754 |
On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 5:01:11 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 3:46:18 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> > > >> >> Classic denial of reality by the delusional. > >> > > >> > It's not necessary to deny what has never been presented. > >> > >> Classic denial of reality by the delusional. > >> > >> > Do you have any proof that clear air contains gaseous H2O? > >> > >> You mean around the house? > >> > >> Other than every phisics and chemistry book, no. > >> > >> -- > >> Jim Pennino > > > > Excellent. You are making progress, Jimbo. > > In your delusional state you probably think that response is clever > and not stupendously insane. > > > Isn't science fun! > > How would you know? > > > -- > Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 10:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <953edcd4-be38-4f04-8511-ea1f6df75b59@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559220 |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 8:54:01 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 5:01:11 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > >> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 3:46:18 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Classic denial of reality by the delusional. > > >> > > > >> > It's not necessary to deny what has never been presented. > > >> > > >> Classic denial of reality by the delusional. > > >> > > >> > Do you have any proof that clear air contains gaseous H2O? > > >> > > >> You mean around the house? > > >> > > >> Other than every phisics and chemistry book, no. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Jim Pennino > > > > > > Excellent. You are making progress, Jimbo. > > > > In your delusional state you probably think that response is clever > > and not stupendously insane. > > > > > Isn't science fun! > > > > > How would you know? > > > > > > -- > > Jim Pennino Stars are big on plasma.Earth's core too.I use it there since it has electricity to create Earth's magnetic field.Imperial thinkers use a red hot liquid generator. Curie told us why that thinking is crazy. TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 11:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9278a93b-6191-4390-9b6d-c6ed9373999e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559270 |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 10:47:10 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 8:54:01 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 5:01:11 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > >> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 3:46:18 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> Classic denial of reality by the delusional. > > > >> > > > > >> > It's not necessary to deny what has never been presented. > > > >> > > > >> Classic denial of reality by the delusional. > > > >> > > > >> > Do you have any proof that clear air contains gaseous H2O? > > > >> > > > >> You mean around the house? > > > >> > > > >> Other than every phisics and chemistry book, no. > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Jim Pennino > > > > > > > > Excellent. You are making progress, Jimbo. > > > > > > In your delusional state you probably think that response is clever > > > and not stupendously insane. > > > > > > > Isn't science fun! > > > > > > > > How would you know? > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jim Pennino > > Stars are big on plasma.Earth's core too.I use it there since it has electricity to create Earth's magnetic field.Imperial thinkers use a red hot liquid generator. Curie told us why that thinking is crazy. TreBert Yeah, like everything, plasma is a relative thing. When you have electricity mixed with air you have a slight plasma. Mix some moisture into it and you have a slightly stronger plasma due to the electromagnetic effects of water's high surface tension. Hit that moist plasma with wind shear, and you cause spinning of the microdroplets, maximizing surface tension, and that creates the plasma that underies jet streams, tornadoes, and hurricanes. It's no big deal. But people like to be dogmatic. They want simple rules. Well, reality doesn't comply with simplicity. Reality is relativistic. The siimpletons need to take a chill pill and learn to think relativistically.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 14:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c7fed776-45cb-40fe-a115-3c36a7457fda@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559284 |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 2:16:26 PM UTC-5, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
[]
>
> Yeah, like everything, plasma is a relative thing.
no, it isn't.
When will you admit you have no real science education?
[nonsense deleted]
>
> It's no big deal. But people like to be dogmatic.
Pot-kettle ('nuf said)
> They want simple rules. Well, reality doesn't comply with simplicity.
and mix in a little something that makes sense to confuse the layman.
> Reality is relativistic. The siimpletons need to take a chill pill
> and learn to think relativistically.
That's a good troll.
Enjoy the weekend.
ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 14:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <73346419-1b59-414c-a3fd-1003d3880fce@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559353 |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 2:04:42 PM UTC-8, edpr...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 2:16:26 PM UTC-5, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > [] > > > > Yeah, like everything, plasma is a relative thing. > > no, it isn't. If that is what you think why not make an argument to that effect?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 22:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <u4fpqc-04d.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559357 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 2:04:42 PM UTC-8, edpr...@gmail.com wrote: >> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 2:16:26 PM UTC-5, Solving Tornadoes wrote: >> [] >> > >> > Yeah, like everything, plasma is a relative thing. >> >> no, it isn't. > > If that is what you think why not make an argument to that effect? Science is not an arguement, science is repeatable, reproducible experiments. Only kooks argue about science. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 15:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6eaef694-552d-4ce9-9760-1833426d067e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559393 |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 2:46:09 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Science is not an arguement, science is repeatable, reproducible experiments. > > Only kooks argue about science. Scientist argue all the time, dumbass.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 23:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e2hpqc-0bd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559402 |
Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 2:46:09 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> Science is not an arguement, science is repeatable, reproducible experiments. >> >> Only kooks argue about science. > > Scientist argue all the time, dumbass. Nope, kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 15:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <80b55087-d9da-4b96-9b68-a250f931255f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559411 |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 3:16:08 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> Only kooks argue about science. > > > > Scientist argue all the time, dumbass. > > Nope, kook. People argue. Scientists are people, not saints. Sorry to burst your bubble.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 15:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <21bcf14b-9b60-4635-b5ca-4626d534eb6a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559416 |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 6:29:27 PM UTC-5, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 3:16:08 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > >> Only kooks argue about science. > > > > > > Scientist argue all the time, dumbass. > > > > Nope, kook. > > People argue. Scientists are people, not saints. Saints were people too?! Have you anything significant Troll Tornadoes? > Sorry to burst your bubble. Breaking non-existent bubbles takes no points. Touché |to͞oˈSHā| to you! -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: I hope m(y) English has some Spin spin SPIN!”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 15:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <36873216-b0b1-4dbc-8d63-276527d9c0bd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559425 |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 3:51:18 PM UTC-8, Mahipal wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 6:29:27 PM UTC-5, Solving Tornadoes wrote: > > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 3:16:08 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > > > >> Only kooks argue about science. > > > > > > > > Scientist argue all the time, dumbass. > > > > > > Nope, kook. > > > > People argue. Scientists are people, not saints. > > Saints were people too?! Have you anything significant Troll Tornadoes? You seem frustrated. Bad day?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 00:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qflpqc-8pd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559416 |
Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 3:16:08 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >> Only kooks argue about science. >> > >> > Scientist argue all the time, dumbass. >> >> Nope, kook. > > People argue. Scientists are people, not saints. > > Sorry to burst your bubble. Scientists may argue with their wives but they don't generally argue with each other as you would define "argue", i.e. they don't produce kook web sites, home made youtube videos or arm waving nonsense as proof of things while, unlike you, they do refer to established literature. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 16:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e1dcf4de-44cd-4329-9605-320ffcfb317a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559433 |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:31:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Scientists may argue with their wives but they don't generally argue > with each other I think you are just a dumb bunny that thinks everything is known. Like many others, you do google searches and think you know truth. Believers can't deal with contradiction, they get emotional. Scientists are the same. Scientists are not immune from belief. > as you would define "argue", i.e. they don't produce > kook web sites, home made youtube videos or arm waving nonsense as > proof of things while, unlike you, they do refer to established literature. So, why do you think it is that nobody can dispute what I'm saying? Instead of of sitting around screaming at the computer screen why not ask some scientists to help you find the thousands of experiments that you keep telling us about. All you need to do is find one, right? Why do you think it is that despite thousands of experiments you can't even find one? Surely all you science groupies could put your heads together . . . naw.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 00:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n7npqc-6vd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559435 |
Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:31:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> Scientists may argue with their wives but they don't generally argue >> with each other > > I think you are just a dumb bunny that thinks everything is known. Angry attacks are the typical response ot the delusional when their delusions are challenged. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 18:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <34991fa5-2a0b-42cb-9de6-f71f1d32e07c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559445 |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 5:01:06 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:31:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > >> Scientists may argue with their wives but they don't generally argue > >> with each other > > > > I think you are just a dumb bunny that thinks everything is known. > > Angry attacks are the typical response ot the delusional when their > delusions are challenged. Where are the thousands of papers?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 03:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <650qqc-tqe.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559457 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 5:01:06 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:31:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> > >> >> Scientists may argue with their wives but they don't generally argue >> >> with each other >> > >> > I think you are just a dumb bunny that thinks everything is known. >> >> Angry attacks are the typical response ot the delusional when their >> delusions are challenged. > > Where are the thousands of papers? At universities and archives as anyone with an education knows. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 19:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ae003d4a-ef37-47ab-8982-92027fe32d48@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559457 |
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 9:03:52 PM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 5:01:06 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:31:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > > > >> Scientists may argue with their wives but they don't generally argue > > >> with each other > > > > > > I think you are just a dumb bunny that thinks everything is known. > > > > Angry attacks are the typical response ot the delusional when their > > delusions are challenged. > > Where are the thousands of papers? You mean Mean MEAN you don't know? Just email Snowden. Edward. That one. O wait... them thousands of papers might be on Hillary's Servers. Email only. Of course. What, do I dress Dress DRESS like a Rookie?! Let me check, I'll get back to you Insane James. Do hold your breath. TIA. What do AI Psychologists have against physics and people in this NG? Is it the size of their AI hands or the size of their ...youKnow? A Loud Liar Speakeths: This Lie is a sentence. -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: Just Another Market Ed Da(y)...” So I hear this on the Talking Heads radio news @#C-SPAN station: “A week a ago today Justice Scalia was buried following his death.” So I thought to meself, very weird(y) contemplative I==E(y)e as I am: That sure is better than the other way around as time marches forward?!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 14:14 -0800 |
| Subject | cc = 1/em |
| Message-ID | <04ceab6c-93d0-4a9d-81ba-47691ac1492e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559353 |
relativism re the speed (not velocity, of light, requires only the secondpower of the speed of light, which is akin to the rate of growth of the wavefront (per second per second > > Reality is relativistic. The siimpletons need to take a chill pill > > and learn to think relativistically. > > That's a good troll. > Enjoy the weekend. > > ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 19:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <j2rjqc-gkn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #558618 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 10:01:06 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> > Actually, he's right. Our atmosphere is a slight plasma. And when water >> > is mixed in it becomes even stronger, due to water's surface tension. >> >> Nope, you don't understand what a plasma is. > > I do know. The difference is that I am not a dogmatic fool. Nope, just an ignorant, delusional fool. > Plasma is a concept. It's a behavior. An ionic plasma is hot. A plasma > that is a consequence of H bonds occurs at ambient temps. Actually, it is the 4th state of matter; no plasma at ambient temps. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 17:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <56d76347$0$4506$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #558595 |
On 03/02/2016 11:57 AM, HVAC wrote: > A bit of plasma could be found everywhere > ---------- > > No > Used his superpowers to determine this.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web