Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #520706 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-13 12:05 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-14 04:21 -0500 |
| Articles | 15 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 12:05 -0500
Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-13 14:29 -0400
Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:50 -0500
Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 15:10 -0500
Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 21:35 +0100
Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:12 -0500
Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 23:29 +0100
Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 17:35 -0500
Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-13 23:58 +0100
Re: Rocky proves nothing jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:21 +0000
Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Why can Roger be honest?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:27 -0500
Re: Rocky can't read his own link jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:19 +0000
Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:26 -0500
Re: Rocky doesn't know history jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:23 +0000
Re: Rocky doesn't know history "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 04:21 -0500
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 12:05 -0500 |
| Subject | Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 |
| Message-ID | <7omdncosCNxgMWjInZ2dnUU7-dGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi Arabia should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a bogus reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were Iraq and Afghanistan. Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/01/suppressed-proof-saudi-arabia-was-complicit-in-911/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 14:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <20150913142919.0000789f@uk.mo> |
| In reply to | #520706 |
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:05:18 -0500 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 That has been known for years. According to you they were complicit in nothing. Hey Ichabod What do you not have a job?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 13:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9bhbvatshcchfmrmrv38pf2jn4q2nd5hum@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #520706 |
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:05:18 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi Arabia
>should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a bogus
>reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were Iraq and
>Afghanistan.
>
Iraq has had a central bank since 1956.
Afghanistan has had a central bank since 1939.
If you wish, I'll once again provide the valid, verifiable
evidence for my claim. Of course you'll just run away from it as you
did last time. Your mental defect(s) won't permit you to accept
anything valid.
>Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/01/suppressed-proof-saudi-arabia-was-complicit-in-911/
False evidence is false.
"Numerous, highly-connected sources with the US intel community..."
Who are these sources? Why should we accept the claims of people
who may not even exist?
"Intel sources have also confirmed that this cover-up..."
Where can I, or anyone else with the desire, confirm these intel
sources?
And so on.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 15:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) |
| Message-ID | <Ws6dnVFobvTTRWjInZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520735 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:9bhbvatshcchfmrmrv38pf2jn4q2nd5hum@4ax.com... > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:05:18 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi Arabia >>should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a bogus >>reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were Iraq >>and >>Afghanistan. >> > > Iraq has had a central bank since 1956. > Afghanistan has had a central bank since 1939. Wow, that means I've caught you in 5 lies because those two countries did not have central banks in 2000. See: http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/banking_and_taxation_irs_and_insurance/social_security/news.php?q=1320062234
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 21:35 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) |
| Message-ID | <mt4mjr$8gv$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #520781 |
On 13/09/2015 21:10, Rocky wrote: > "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:9bhbvatshcchfmrmrv38pf2jn4q2nd5hum@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:05:18 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi Arabia >>> should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a bogus >>> reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were Iraq >>> and >>> Afghanistan. >>> >> >> Iraq has had a central bank since 1956. >> Afghanistan has had a central bank since 1939. > > Wow, that means I've caught you in 5 lies because those two countries did > not have central banks in 2000. See: > http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/banking_and_taxation_irs_and_insurance/social_security/news.php?q=1320062234 > That site talks about "Rothschild owned Central Bank:", according to you they own the Bank of England, and the national banks of the USA & all European countries. So it looks like you are lying again. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 16:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) |
| Message-ID | <npKdne56Zqpve2jInZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520794 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mt4mjr$8gv$5@dont-email.me... > On 13/09/2015 21:10, Rocky wrote: >> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:9bhbvatshcchfmrmrv38pf2jn4q2nd5hum@4ax.com... >>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:05:18 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi >>>> Arabia >>>> should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a >>>> bogus >>>> reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were >>>> Iraq >>>> and >>>> Afghanistan. >>>> >>> >>> Iraq has had a central bank since 1956. >>> Afghanistan has had a central bank since 1939. >> >> Wow, that means I've caught you in 5 lies because those two countries did >> not have central banks in 2000. See: >> >> http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/banking_and_taxation_irs_and_insurance/social_security/news.php?q=1320062234 >> > > That site talks about "Rothschild owned Central Bank:", according to you > they own the Bank of England, and the national banks of the USA & all > European countries. So it looks like you are lying again. Ok so if what Kid states is true then all we did was force Iraq and Afghanistan to go from one Central Bank to a Rothschild Central bank. Either way we still didn't fight for justice after 9/11 but after 9/11 we fought wars for our banksters and Kid helped me prove that. <G>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 23:29 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) |
| Message-ID | <mt4t92$337$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #520800 |
On 13/09/2015 22:12, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:mt4mjr$8gv$5@dont-email.me... >> On 13/09/2015 21:10, Rocky wrote: >>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:9bhbvatshcchfmrmrv38pf2jn4q2nd5hum@4ax.com... >>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:05:18 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi >>>>> Arabia >>>>> should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a >>>>> bogus >>>>> reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were >>>>> Iraq >>>>> and >>>>> Afghanistan. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Iraq has had a central bank since 1956. >>>> Afghanistan has had a central bank since 1939. >>> >>> Wow, that means I've caught you in 5 lies because those two countries did >>> not have central banks in 2000. See: >>> >>> http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/banking_and_taxation_irs_and_insurance/social_security/news.php?q=1320062234 >>> >> >> That site talks about "Rothschild owned Central Bank:", according to you >> they own the Bank of England, and the national banks of the USA & all >> European countries. So it looks like you are lying again. > > Ok so if what Kid states is true So you admit you lied about 'Central Banks', that's a good start. > then all we did was force Iraq and > Afghanistan to go from one Central Bank to a Rothschild Central bank. Your proof of this is? > Either way we still didn't fight for justice after 9/11 but after 9/11 we > fought wars for our banksters and Kid helped me prove that. <G> > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 17:35 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) |
| Message-ID | <PPmdnfeBJZrFZ2jInZ2dnUU7-VednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #520825 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mt4t92$337$2@dont-email.me... > On 13/09/2015 22:12, Rocky wrote: >> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >> news:mt4mjr$8gv$5@dont-email.me... >>> On 13/09/2015 21:10, Rocky wrote: >>>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:9bhbvatshcchfmrmrv38pf2jn4q2nd5hum@4ax.com... >>>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:05:18 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi >>>>>> Arabia >>>>>> should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a >>>>>> bogus >>>>>> reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were >>>>>> Iraq >>>>>> and >>>>>> Afghanistan. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Iraq has had a central bank since 1956. >>>>> Afghanistan has had a central bank since 1939. >>>> >>>> Wow, that means I've caught you in 5 lies because those two countries >>>> did >>>> not have central banks in 2000. See: >>>> >>>> http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/banking_and_taxation_irs_and_insurance/social_security/news.php?q=1320062234 >>>> >>> >>> That site talks about "Rothschild owned Central Bank:", according to you >>> they own the Bank of England, and the national banks of the USA & all >>> European countries. So it looks like you are lying again. >> >> Ok so if what Kid states is true > > So you admit you lied about 'Central Banks', that's a good start. I just failed to state "Rothschild owned Central Bank" and if you want to bitch about that you are clearly an asshole and have earned the name T-annoy again and again and again. >> then all we did was force Iraq and >> Afghanistan to go from one Central Bank to a Rothschild Central bank. > > Your proof of this is? It is in the link above you idiot. Gaud you are st00pid. >> Either way we still didn't fight for justice after 9/11 but after 9/11 we >> fought wars for our banksters and Kid helped me prove that. <G>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 23:58 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) |
| Message-ID | <mt4uv1$91o$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #520830 |
On 13/09/2015 23:35, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:mt4t92$337$2@dont-email.me... >> On 13/09/2015 22:12, Rocky wrote: >>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message >>> news:mt4mjr$8gv$5@dont-email.me... >>>> On 13/09/2015 21:10, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:9bhbvatshcchfmrmrv38pf2jn4q2nd5hum@4ax.com... >>>>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:05:18 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi >>>>>>> Arabia >>>>>>> should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a >>>>>>> bogus >>>>>>> reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were >>>>>>> Iraq >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> Afghanistan. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Iraq has had a central bank since 1956. >>>>>> Afghanistan has had a central bank since 1939. >>>>> >>>>> Wow, that means I've caught you in 5 lies because those two countries >>>>> did >>>>> not have central banks in 2000. See: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/banking_and_taxation_irs_and_insurance/social_security/news.php?q=1320062234 >>>>> >>>> >>>> That site talks about "Rothschild owned Central Bank:", according to you >>>> they own the Bank of England, and the national banks of the USA & all >>>> European countries. So it looks like you are lying again. >>> >>> Ok so if what Kid states is true >> >> So you admit you lied about 'Central Banks', that's a good start. > > I just failed to state "Rothschild owned Central Bank" and if you want to > bitch about that you are clearly an asshole and have earned the name T-annoy > again and again and again. > So you lied or you failed, that makes you a liar or a failure, which is it? >>> then all we did was force Iraq and >>> Afghanistan to go from one Central Bank to a Rothschild Central bank. >> >> Your proof of this is? > > It is in the link above you idiot. Gaud you are st00pid. But that was not a link about Central Banks, Gaud you are st00pid. > >>> Either way we still didn't fight for justice after 9/11 but after 9/11 we >>> fought wars for our banksters and Kid helped me prove that. <G> > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 23:21 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky proves nothing |
| Message-ID | <t0dhcc-afo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #520800 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Ok so if what Kid states is true then all we did was force Iraq and > Afghanistan to go from one Central Bank to a Rothschild Central bank. > Either way we still didn't fight for justice after 9/11 but after 9/11 we > fought wars for our banksters and Kid helped me prove that. <G> The only thing you have proved is that you are a raving, delusional, lunatic; nothing more. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 04:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Why can Roger be honest?) |
| Message-ID | <sm4dvatioh5crnogn0ofjplk7hqp3snrfc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #520800 |
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 16:12:34 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:mt4mjr$8gv$5@dont-email.me...
>> On 13/09/2015 21:10, Rocky wrote:
>>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:9bhbvatshcchfmrmrv38pf2jn4q2nd5hum@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:05:18 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi
>>>>> Arabia
>>>>> should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a
>>>>> bogus
>>>>> reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were
>>>>> Iraq and
>>>>> Afghanistan.
>>>>
Please use a REAL news reader, or install quote fix.
>>>> Iraq has had a central bank since 1956.
>>>> Afghanistan has had a central bank since 1939.
>>>
>>> Wow, that means I've caught you in 5 lies because those two countries did
>>> not have central banks in 2000. See:
>>>
>>> http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/banking_and_taxation_irs_and_insurance/social_security/news.php?q=1320062234
>>>
>>
>> That site talks about "Rothschild owned Central Bank:", according to you
>> they own the Bank of England, and the national banks of the USA & all
>> European countries. So it looks like you are lying again.
>
>Ok so if what Kid states is true then all we did was force Iraq and
Who is this "Kid" about whom you are so OBSESSED? Will you begin
stalking and harassing him like you did that one woman who had NO
interest in you?
>Afghanistan to go from one Central Bank to a Rothschild Central bank.
And now we see you wriggling. That's your tell that you know
you've been caught in a lie.
>Either way we still didn't fight for justice after 9/11 but after 9/11 we
>fought wars for our banksters and Kid helped me prove that. <G>
Who is this "Kid" person, and why are you so OBSESSED with him?
Are you going to claim another non-existent love triangle?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 23:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky can't read his own link |
| Message-ID | <ttchcc-afo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #520781 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:9bhbvatshcchfmrmrv38pf2jn4q2nd5hum@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:05:18 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi Arabia >>>should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a bogus >>>reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were Iraq >>>and >>>Afghanistan. >>> >> >> Iraq has had a central bank since 1956. >> Afghanistan has had a central bank since 1939. > > Wow, that means I've caught you in 5 lies because those two countries did > not have central banks in 2000. See: > http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/banking_and_taxation_irs_and_insurance/social_security/news.php?q=1320062234 No Rocky, your kook site link says those countries did not have a central bank owned by the Rothschilds, babbling kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 04:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Suppressed Proof: Saudi Arabia Was Complicit in 9/11 ( Kid has been Kaught in 5 lies ) |
| Message-ID | <tk4dva95v884rb5bhjkji44mh9uhe5mogu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #520781 |
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 15:10:06 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:9bhbvatshcchfmrmrv38pf2jn4q2nd5hum@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:05:18 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi Arabia
>>>should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a bogus
>>>reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were Iraq
>>>and Afghanistan.
>>
>> Iraq has had a central bank since 1956.
>> Afghanistan has had a central bank since 1939.
>
>Wow, that means I've caught you in 5 lies because those two countries did
>not have central banks in 2000. See:
> http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/banking_and_taxation_irs_and_insurance/social_security/news.php?q=1320062234
Lair.
The link brings up Rothchild owned banks.
Now try to wriggle out of the LIE you've been caught in.
http://www.cbi.iq/index.php?pid=History
I could link to Afghanistan's central bank, but one is all I need
to prove you the liar you are.
What lie will you offer now?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-13 19:23 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky doesn't know history |
| Message-ID | <v1vgcc-p6n.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #520706 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi Arabia > should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a bogus > reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were Iraq and > Afghanistan. Both had central banks long before 9/11. Iraq and Afghanistan were where the terrorists were primarily operating from and the governments refused to do anything about them, delusional fuckwit. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-14 04:21 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky doesn't know history |
| Message-ID | <5b4dva9r0f3cr9m907k8n2ljd7p9o2od6m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #520753 |
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 19:23:11 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>> Just the fact that so many of the alleged hijackers came from Saudi Arabia
>> should have made Saudi Arabia a suspect but all it did was give us a bogus
>> reason to attack two countries without a central bank and they were Iraq and
>> Afghanistan.
>
>Both had central banks long before 9/11.
>
He knows this. I explained this to him over a week ago. Sadly,
his mental health is such that he's unable to admit reality.
>Iraq and Afghanistan were where the terrorists were primarily operating
>from and the governments refused to do anything about them, delusional
>fuckwit.
He knows this too. But again, he can't admit what really is.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web