Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #602872 > unrolled thread

Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence?

Started byJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
First post2016-10-29 11:30 -0700
Last post2016-11-18 08:34 -0800
Articles 13 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 11:30 -0700
    Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 14:21 -0700
      Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-29 23:54 +0000
        Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 19:01 -0700
          Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-30 04:35 +0000
        Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 14:05 -0800
          Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 15:45 -0800
            Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-17 18:41 -0600
              Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 08:34 -0800
            ... but nobody can find ... some thing noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 15:22 -0800
            Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-15 18:45 -0800
              Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-12-16 10:35 -0800
        Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 08:34 -0800

#602872 — Re: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence?

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-29 11:30 -0700
SubjectRe: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find the evidence?
Message-ID<74ab0b3b-aa86-4e02-a65e-7d2c68b2c473@googlegroups.com>
On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 10:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> >> 
> >> > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
> >> 
> >> I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't
> >> provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
> > 
> > The only evidence we have are the steam tables.
> 
> Complete steam tables go down to 0 C.
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

Amazing.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#602899

Frompnalsing@gmail.com
Date2016-10-29 14:21 -0700
Message-ID<9b8ca4fd-71e3-4049-bb65-10ed3b6edaa4@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#602872
On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 11:30:53 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 10:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
> > >> 
> > >> I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't
> > >> provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
> > > 
> > > The only evidence we have are the steam tables.
> > 
> > Complete steam tables go down to 0 C.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jim Pennino
> 
> Amazing.

Yes, amazing! Jim Pennino is wrong... these steam tables DON'T go down to zero, they only go down to 0.01 degrees C!

https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/definitions/steam-tables-5

http://www.slideshare.net/SGhallab/steam-tables-fifth-edition-by-rogers-and-mayhew

http://moyfutasi.es.tl/nist-steam-tables-download.htm

https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/fundamentals-of-chemical/9780132693158/app05.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602923

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-10-29 23:54 +0000
Message-ID<ifpfed-eh2.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#602899
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 11:30:53 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 10:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > >> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> > >> 
>> > >> > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
>> > >> 
>> > >> I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't
>> > >> provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
>> > > 
>> > > The only evidence we have are the steam tables.
>> > 
>> > Complete steam tables go down to 0 C.
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > Jim Pennino
>> 
>> Amazing.
> 
> Yes, amazing! Jim Pennino is wrong... these steam tables DON'T go down to zero, they only go down to 0.01 degrees C!
> 
> https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/definitions/steam-tables-5
> 
> http://www.slideshare.net/SGhallab/steam-tables-fifth-edition-by-rogers-and-mayhew
> 
> http://moyfutasi.es.tl/nist-steam-tables-download.htm
> 
> https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/fundamentals-of-chemical/9780132693158/app05.html

Extrapolate the followng to 0 C:

http://www.steamtablesonline.com/images/steam%20tables%20p-h%20diagram%20(large).png


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602932

Frompnalsing@gmail.com
Date2016-10-29 19:01 -0700
Message-ID<7af0586d-2f7c-40f3-9104-7ff297ba8848@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#602923
On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 5:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> pna...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 11:30:53 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> >> On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 10:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > >> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't
> >> > >> provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
> >> > > 
> >> > > The only evidence we have are the steam tables.
> >> > 
> >> > Complete steam tables go down to 0 C.
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > Jim Pennino
> >> 
> >> Amazing.
> > 
> > Yes, amazing! Jim Pennino is wrong... these steam tables DON'T go down to zero, they only go down to 0.01 degrees C!
> > 
> > https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/definitions/steam-tables-5
> > 
> > http://www.slideshare.net/SGhallab/steam-tables-fifth-edition-by-rogers-and-mayhew
> > 
> > http://moyfutasi.es.tl/nist-steam-tables-download.htm
> > 
> > https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/fundamentals-of-chemical/9780132693158/app05.html
> 
> Extrapolate the followng to 0 C:
> 
> http://www.steamtablesonline.com/images/steam%20tables%20p-h%20diagram%20(large).png
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

Jim, it was  joke :>)

Sheesh!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#602941

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-10-30 04:35 +0000
Message-ID<ts9ged-sc4.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#602932
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 5:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> pna...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 11:30:53 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> >> On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 10:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> > >> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >> > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
>> >> > >> 
>> >> > >> I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't
>> >> > >> provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > The only evidence we have are the steam tables.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Complete steam tables go down to 0 C.
>> >> > 
>> >> > -- 
>> >> > Jim Pennino
>> >> 
>> >> Amazing.
>> > 
>> > Yes, amazing! Jim Pennino is wrong... these steam tables DON'T go down to zero, they only go down to 0.01 degrees C!
>> > 
>> > https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/definitions/steam-tables-5
>> > 
>> > http://www.slideshare.net/SGhallab/steam-tables-fifth-edition-by-rogers-and-mayhew
>> > 
>> > http://moyfutasi.es.tl/nist-steam-tables-download.htm
>> > 
>> > https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/fundamentals-of-chemical/9780132693158/app05.html
>> 
>> Extrapolate the followng to 0 C:
>> 
>> http://www.steamtablesonline.com/images/steam%20tables%20p-h%20diagram%20(large).png
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jim Pennino
> 
> Jim, it was  joke :>)
> 
> Sheesh!

Actually there is a reason for steam tables only going down to 0.01 C
or so as can be seen by anyone that took high school analytical geometry
in the graph I posted.

Of course the whole thing is over McGinn's head and education level.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#605265

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-17 14:05 -0800
Message-ID<55cc6606-75be-4402-a81b-3316efa64028@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#602923
On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 5:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 11:30:53 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> >> On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 10:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > >> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't
> >> > >> provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
> >> > > 
> >> > > The only evidence we have are the steam tables.
> >> > 
> >> > Complete steam tables go down to 0 C.
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > Jim Pennino
> >> 
> >> Amazing.
> > 
> > Yes, amazing! Jim Pennino is wrong... these steam tables DON'T go down to zero, they only go down to 0.01 degrees C!
> > 
> > https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/definitions/steam-tables-5
> > 
> > http://www.slideshare.net/SGhallab/steam-tables-fifth-edition-by-rogers-and-mayhew
> > 
> > http://moyfutasi.es.tl/nist-steam-tables-download.htm
> > 
> > https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/fundamentals-of-chemical/9780132693158/app05.html
> 
> Extrapolate the followng to 0 C:
> 
> http://www.steamtablesonline.com/images/steam%20tables%20p-h%20diagram%20(large).png
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

Thanks Jim.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#605297

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-17 15:45 -0800
Message-ID<74aa8cb6-b277-4a6e-b17f-5db2e0071e36@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#605265
must have to do with the partial pressure of water vapor,
depending upon a)
altitude

> > > Yes, amazing! Jim Pennino is wrong... these steam tables DON'T go down to

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#605307

FromYuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com>
Date2016-11-17 18:41 -0600
Message-ID<o0linb$hsc$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#605297
On 11/17/2016 5:45 PM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> must have to do with the partial pressure of water vapor,
> depending upon a)
> altitude
>
>>>> Yes, amazing! Jim Pennino is wrong... these steam tables DON'T go down to
>

steam tables are adjustable, there is a knob that turns the heat up and 
down, at LUBY's Cafiterias

(part 72 - McFly next wanders into Lubys to glance at a steam table...)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#605330

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-18 08:34 -0800
Message-ID<57ad762e-b17a-488f-832a-791807eb3971@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#605307
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 4:41:22 PM UTC-8, Yuri Kreaton wrote:
> On 11/17/2016 5:45 PM, noTthaTguY wrote:
> > must have to do with the partial pressure of water vapor,
> > depending upon a)
> > altitude
> >
> >>>> Yes, amazing! Jim Pennino is wrong... these steam tables DON'T go down to
> >
> 
> steam tables are adjustable, there is a knob that turns the heat up and 
> down, at LUBY's Cafiterias
> 
> (part 72 - McFly next wanders into Lubys to glance at a steam table...)

Serigio.  Do your shirts still smoke?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#605487 — ... but nobody can find ... some thing

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-19 15:22 -0800
Subject... but nobody can find ... some thing
Message-ID<4bf3dd92-f065-4479-a879-4a53f418bab5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#605297
ha, really, ha, really, ha

> must have to do with the partial pressure of water vapor,
> depending upon a)
> altitude
> 

wrong... these steam tables DON'T go down to

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#609212

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-15 18:45 -0800
Message-ID<29b5d386-5be5-4719-879d-ec35cf60429e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#605297
of course, if it were a table from a steam-locomotive,
it would have to be calibrated for altitude;
it's probably just from a stationary boileRRoom,
like a nuke-E

> must have to do with the partial pressure of water vapor,
> depending upon a)
> altitude

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#609254

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-12-16 10:35 -0800
Message-ID<f686836f-f284-4fb0-97d2-ee398acda2d2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#609212
On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 6:45:20 PM UTC-8, noTthaTguY wrote:
> of course, if it were a table from a steam-locomotive,
> it would have to be calibrated for altitude;
> it's probably just from a stationary boileRRoom,
> like a nuke-E
> 
> > must have to do with the partial pressure of water vapor,
> > depending upon a)
> > altitude

Uh huh.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#605331

FromJames McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-18 08:34 -0800
Message-ID<901e9d99-7fbc-4bc8-bc51-07e8446645fe@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#602923
On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 5:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 11:30:53 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> >> On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 10:01:05 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> >> > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 9:09:40 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > >> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:29:37 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> > It must be frustrating to be so sure you are right and so totally unable to say how or why.
> >> > >> 
> >> > >> I was about to say the exact same thing to you, since you haven't
> >> > >> provided a single experiment or observation to support your wacky theory.
> >> > > 
> >> > > The only evidence we have are the steam tables.
> >> > 
> >> > Complete steam tables go down to 0 C.
> >> > 
> >> > -- 
> >> > Jim Pennino
> >> 
> >> Amazing.
> > 
> > Yes, amazing! Jim Pennino is wrong... these steam tables DON'T go down to zero, they only go down to 0.01 degrees C!
> > 
> > https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/definitions/steam-tables-5
> > 
> > http://www.slideshare.net/SGhallab/steam-tables-fifth-edition-by-rogers-and-mayhew
> > 
> > http://moyfutasi.es.tl/nist-steam-tables-download.htm
> > 
> > https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/fundamentals-of-chemical/9780132693158/app05.html
> 
> Extrapolate the followng to 0 C:
> 
> http://www.steamtablesonline.com/images/steam%20tables%20p-h%20diagram%20(large).png
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jim Pennino

Classic!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web