Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #515431 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-28 12:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 137 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:09 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-21 15:23 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:09 +1000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:01 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:15 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:23 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 16:47 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:48 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 17:38 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:49 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 17:51 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:29 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:28 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:16 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 09:11 +0100
2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:51 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:26 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:38 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:40 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 17:45 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 11:59 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:45 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:10 +0000
Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:29 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:33 +0000
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:14 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 08:39 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 15:00 +0100
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:00 +0000
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:58 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:50 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:07 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:11 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 21:17 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 22:58 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:43 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:16 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:05 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 01:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:35 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:37 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:41 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 06:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 07:40 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:34 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 14:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:52 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:53 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 08:42 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:53 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:34 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 18:02 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 21:36 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:07 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:06 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 10:03 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:17 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:07 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-23 09:07 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 06:08 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:22 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:31 -0700
Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 10:43 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:01 +0000
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 19:38 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:08 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:35 +0000
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:05 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 13:06 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 21:47 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:38 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:19 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:43 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:49 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-23 04:44 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 09:56 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 10:46 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:14 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:02 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:02 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-27 19:21 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:39 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:05 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:10 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 18:17 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:31 +0200
Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-28 13:54 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:42 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:09 +0000
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:12 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:17 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0700
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:16 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 17:17 +0200
box cutters were not illegal, at that time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:27 -0700
Page 1 of 7 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit |
| Message-ID | <65002bc896720800888a3c3ecc6b84d3@dizum.com> |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:C7ydnYCKlO0ocEjInZ2dnUU7-R-dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Th<SMACKAKOOK!> You fucking moron, you keep going deeper and deeper down the rabbit hole of insanity, listening to kooks who are just as or more retarded than you are. <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Barbara_Olson_calls> Barbara Olson called the operator and asked to be put through to Ted Olson's office, the secretary answered and transferred the call to him. The phone records on the website above proves it, you fucking retard. Stop drinking the Kookade, pull your retarded head out of your ass, take your meds, learn to do proper research instead of believing ever stupid fucking thing you read, and until you do all the above, shut your stupid fucking spewhole, you retarded fuckwit. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 15 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 satellite uplink disruptions in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There's now 15 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 17:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Z42dnYBDLuuBzUvInZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515431 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:65002bc896720800888a3c3ecc6b84d3@dizum.com... > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Rocky, in <news:C7ydnYCKlO0ocEjInZ2dnUU7-R-dnZ2d@giganews.com> > did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> "Th<SMACKAKOOK!> > > You fucking moron, you keep going deeper and deeper down the > rabbit hole of insanity, listening to kooks who are just as or > more retarded than you are. > > <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Barbara_Olson_calls> > > Barbara Olson called the operator and asked to be put through to > Ted Olson's office, the secretary answered and transferred the > call to him. The phone records on the website above proves it, > you fucking retard. > > Stop drinking the Kookade, pull your retarded head out of your > ass, take your meds, learn to do proper research instead of > believing ever stupid fucking thing you read, and until you do > all the above, shut your stupid fucking spewhole, you retarded > fuckwit. And in the following exhibit what you need to do after you select Flight 77 is search for Barbara Olson and then click on the icon in the lower left that looks like a phone and it shows there was a call to the "Department of Justice" but it was an "unconnected call." <G> This is one of the exhibits from the Zacarias Moussaoui trial and you have to download it to view it:: http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/flights/P200054.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 20:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0e1dta9it4oam2eaophf0hnd7g8v623n8l@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515461 |
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:09:00 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>wrote in message news:65002bc896720800888a3c3ecc6b84d3@dizum.com...
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Rocky, in <news:C7ydnYCKlO0ocEjInZ2dnUU7-R-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>>
>>> "Th<SMACKAKOOK!>
>>
>> You fucking moron, you keep going deeper and deeper down the
>> rabbit hole of insanity, listening to kooks who are just as or
>> more retarded than you are.
>>
>> <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Barbara_Olson_calls>
>>
>> Barbara Olson called the operator and asked to be put through to
>> Ted Olson's office, the secretary answered and transferred the
>> call to him. The phone records on the website above proves it,
>> you fucking retard.
>>
>> Stop drinking the Kookade, pull your retarded head out of your
>> ass, take your meds, learn to do proper research instead of
>> believing ever stupid fucking thing you read, and until you do
>> all the above, shut your stupid fucking spewhole, you retarded
>> fuckwit.
>
>And in the following exhibit what you need to do after you select Flight 77
>is search for Barbara Olson and then click on the icon in the lower left
>that looks like a phone and it shows there was a call to the "Department of
>Justice" but it was an "unconnected call." <G>
>
>This is one of the exhibits from the Zacarias Moussaoui trial and you have
>to download it to view it::
> http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/flights/P200054.html
>
The link FNVW provides proves she got through. I can accept there
was one time she tried and did not. The first item listed supports
such a position. But to base your claims that Barbara never contacted
Ted on one item is stupid, even for you.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 05:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5a352b9031e6f44a2e07d0dc0ddefb82@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515461 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:Z42dnYBDLuuBzUvInZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:65002bc896720800888a3c3ecc6b84d3@dizum.com... >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky, in <news:C7ydnYCKlO0ocEjInZ2dnUU7-R-dnZ2d@giganews.com> >> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> "Th<SMACKAKOOK!> >> You fucking moron, you keep going deeper and deeper down the >> rabbit hole of insanity, listening to kooks who are just as or >> more retarded than you are. >> >> <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Barbara_Olson_calls> >> >> Barbara Olson called the operator and asked to be put through to >> Ted Olson's office, the secretary answered and transferred the >> call to him. The phone records on the website above proves it, >> you fucking retard. >> >> Stop drinking the Kookade, pull your retarded head out of your >> ass, take your meds, learn to do proper research instead of >> believing ever stupid fucking thing you read, and until you do >> all the above, shut your stupid fucking spewhole, you retarded >> fuckwit. > A<SMACKAKOOK!> The disconnected call was the first call Barbara Olson attempted to make, via her cell phone, you fucking frothmonkey. Cell phones tend to get disconnected, as quickly as they hop from cell site to cell site as the plane moves. The remaining calls were from the AirPhone, via the operator, billed collect because Barbara Olson didn't have access to her purse and credit cards (which is why she called the operator, she didn't have a credit card to pay for the calls via the AirPhone)... she and everyone else had been herded to the back of the plane. Your broken brain has already demonstrated that it's far too underpowered to discern reality from fantasy in your promulgating your wholly impossible version of events which violates several laws of physics. Therefore, until you are able to explain exactly how your kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate the laws of physics, you will have your stupid mouth slapped shut every time you open it to drool out more of your tardery. Kook. > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 15 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 satellite uplink disruptions in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There's now 15 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 08:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <M46dnWXB9aGsu0rInZ2dnUU7-b-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515504 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > > > The disconnected call was the first call Barbara Olson attempted > to make, via her cell phone, you fucking frothmonkey. Cell phones > tend to get disconnected, as quickly as they hop from cell site > to cell site as the plane moves. The remaining calls were from > the AirPhone, via the operator, billed collect because Barbara > Olson didn't have access to her purse and credit cards (which is > why she called the operator, she didn't have a credit card to pay > for the calls via the AirPhone)... she and everyone else had been > herded to the back of the plane. Hey Friendly Neighborhood Nut don't bitch at me when it was the FBI's evidence that was used during the Zacarias Moussaoui trial that claimed Barbara never spoke to Ted. DUH. And that same evidence also has a woman that called an answering machine whisper "It's a frame" at the end of her call. Now why would she do that? Don't believe me, well you can hear it yourself in this time indexed link. <G> https://youtu.be/OmM4Tra-rg0?t=3m5s And the very first part of that phone call is at the first part of the above video. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 15:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mr7fq1$h5t$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #515535 |
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >Hey Friendly Neighborhood Nut don't bitch at me when it was the FBI's >evidence that was used during the Zacarias Moussaoui trial that claimed >Barbara never spoke to Ted. DUH. No they didn't. They simply claimed that first call didn't go through. >And that same evidence also has a woman that called an answering machine >whisper "It's a frame" at the end of her call. Now why would she do that? >Don't believe me, well you can hear it yourself in this time indexed link. Hmm. The transcript text has been altered in that Youtube playback of the file from the Moussaoui trial. What else has been altered, k00k? May I assume the audio has been, err, "enhanced"? Stupid k00ktards. They're such sheeple, being led by the nose by the k00kmeisters who create such "enhanced" evidence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515535 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:M46dnWXB9aGsu0rInZ2dnUU7-b-dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message > >> The disconnected call was the first call Barbara Olson attempted >> to make, via her cell phone, you fucking frothmonkey. Cell phones >> tend to get disconnected, as quickly as they hop from cell site >> to cell site as the plane moves. The remaining calls were from >> the AirPhone, via the operator, billed collect because Barbara >> Olson didn't have access to her purse and credit cards (which is >> why she called the operator, she didn't have a credit card to pay >> for the calls via the AirPhone)... she and everyone else had been >> herded to the back of the plane. > Hey<SMACKAKOOK!> Delusional psychotic fuckwits who blather stupidity will have their stupid slobbering gobs smacked shut each time they spew their stupidity, Delusional Psychotic Fuckwit. <http://www.911myths.com/index.php/American_Airlines_Flight_77_Calls> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you retarded fuckwit. They said, and I quote: "57. The records available for the phone calls from American 77 do not allow for a determination of which of four 'connected calls to unknown numbers' represent the two between Barbara and Ted Olson, although the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband’s office (all family members of the Flight 77 passengers and crew were canvassed to see if they had received any phone calls from the hijacked flight, and only Renee May’s parents and Ted Olson indicated that they had received such calls). The four calls were at 9:15:34 for 1 minute, 42 seconds; 9:20:15 for 4 minutes, 34 seconds; 9:25:48 for 2 minutes, 34 seconds; and 9:30:56 for 4 minutes, 20 seconds. FBI report,“American Airlines Airphone Usage,” Sept. 20, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Theodore Olson, Sept. 11, 2001; FBI report of investigation, interview of Helen Voss, Sept. 14, 2001; AAL response to the Commission’s supplemental document request, Jan. 20, 2004. Footnote 57 to Chapter 1, 9/11 Commission Report" Notice the text blurb "the FBI and DOJ believe that all four represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband’s office", you fucking delusional little monkey. The FBI said exactly the *opposite* of what you're claiming. But of course, you've never actually *read* the FBI report, have you? You retard. The FBI said they weren't sure which call belonged to whom because the call was an operator-assisted collect call and thus didn't have proper tracking from the AirPhone system, given that AirPhones were serviced by AT&T Wireless' Aviation Division (ClairCom), and AT&T doesn't bill itself. Verizon serviced airplane phones for TWA (now a part of American), United, Continental, US Airways and most Delta flights, but AT&T had American flights. The phone records of Ted Olson's office prove you're not only wrong, you're not only delusional, but you're retarded, as well. The witnesses, including the AT&T operators (plural, there was more than one phone call from the plane's AirPhone from Barbara Olson to Ted Olson), Ted Olson's secretary and Ted Olson himself. Barbara Olson desperately asked Ted Olson what she should tell the pilot to do, not because she could call the pilot on his phone, but because the pilot was standing in the back of the plane with the passengers. The fucking plane had been hijacked, the terrorists were flying the plane. You idiot. But your broken brain seems to think that everything must be a conspiracy. Occam's Razor makes no sense to you... because you're retarded. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 15 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC. They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There's now 15 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g15ftapgra6tofhdl5h3til543pib7gjir@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515603 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 20:53:21 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
[snip to focus on this one point]
>Notice the text blurb "the FBI and DOJ believe that all four
>represent communications between Barbara Olson and her husband’s
>office", you fucking delusional little monkey.
>
>The FBI said exactly the *opposite* of what you're claiming. But
>of course, you've never actually *read* the FBI report, have you?
>You retard.
I raised much the same point. I don't think either of us were
able to dumb it down to Rocky's intellectual level. It is a LONG trip
for either of us.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 16:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <s25ftal0u2h4a5dlqs2ia895u6hld47aem@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515603 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:59:28 -0700 (PDT), joeturn2@yahoo.com wrote:
Group list restored except for alt.astronomy as it is not relevant
outside of Rocky's delusions.
>> IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
>> reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in
>> little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing
>> your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into
>> a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even
>> started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet.
>> =============================
>>
>> Kook. LOL
>THERE ARE NO NUCLEAR BOMBS
That nuclear bombs exist is well proved.
>This was a fairy tail created to give purpose to get into the war.
The U.S. was already in the war, so fatman and little boy had no
influence there.
>The Govenment stooge Instien creatd a farse to keep scientist from
Do you mean Einstein?
>releasing free energy to the herd.His E=MCsquared balony caused
>scientist to steer away from energy and put forth the effort to build
>a bomb to stop all wars.But after years of failure Roosevelt said if
>you cant make it fake it and Hiroshima/Nagasaki were used to fulfil
>the idiotsy.They put on a show to make people then believe in witch
>craft.Niether city was exposed to nuclear fall out,because it was an
>impossibility.No radiation burns at all.
And yet, there is ample evidence available that both cities were
hit with nuclear (atomic) bombs.
> Just to show you how stupid and gulible the herd is they still to this
>day believe,that the letter j is over 500 years old.Example jesus was
>spelled iesous 600 years ago
Only by the Greeks. And even then, only by those who believed in
the Olympian gods.
>and it means borned of Isis and Zues.
No, it means Hail Zeus.
>GO FIGURE
I figure you've once again allowed me to prove you lack any real
education.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 08:09 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <g58ftapg7uacuaqu40epsgf0jldl30ubf4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515633 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:13:51 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:59:28 -0700 (PDT), joeturn2@yahoo.com wrote: > > >Group list restored except for alt.astronomy as it is not relevant >outside of Rocky's delusions. > > >>> IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from >>> reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in >>> little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing >>> your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into >>> a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even >>> started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. >>> ============================= >>> >>> Kook. LOL >>THERE ARE NO NUCLEAR BOMBS > > That nuclear bombs exist is well proved. > >>This was a fairy tail created to give purpose to get into the war. > > The U.S. was already in the war, so fatman and little boy had no >influence there. > >>The Govenment stooge Instien creatd a farse to keep scientist from > > Do you mean Einstein? Oh! I missed that one. slowjoe is great amusement value. He writes like a 5 year old. I think he's actually 11. He is the Chester to Rockhead's Spike. https://youtu.be/UVNHcob3oJg Shill #2 -- slowjoe's theme http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 05:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mfigtalvkds3hongkc55bfjmnsbn88m6s7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515661 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 08:09:11 +1000, Government Shill #2
<gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:13:51 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:59:28 -0700 (PDT), joeturn2@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>Group list restored except for alt.astronomy as it is not relevant
>>outside of Rocky's delusions.
>>
>>
>>>> IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
>>>> reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in
>>>> little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing
>>>> your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into
>>>> a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even
>>>> started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet.
>>>> =============================
>>>>
>>>> Kook. LOL
>>>THERE ARE NO NUCLEAR BOMBS
>>
>> That nuclear bombs exist is well proved.
>>
>>>This was a fairy tail created to give purpose to get into the war.
>>
>> The U.S. was already in the war, so fatman and little boy had no
>>influence there.
>>
>>>The Govenment stooge Instien creatd a farse to keep scientist from
>>
>> Do you mean Einstein?
>
>Oh! I missed that one. slowjoe is great amusement value. He writes like a 5 year
>old. I think he's actually 11. He is the Chester to Rockhead's Spike.
>
>https://youtu.be/UVNHcob3oJg
>
That is just odd. It may make more sense within the context of
the whole cartoon.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 17:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ffCdnclecKh1AkrInZ2dnUU7-dmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515603 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com... > > The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you > retarded fuckwit. You have never even tried to address why so little remained of the Twin Towers and by looking at their biggest lie it is easy to see that we were given lie after lie after lie including those clearly scripted phone calls. And don't forget there is a much bigger truth and that is no 757 crashed at the Pentagon because it was all smoke from a smoke generator and the law of the Pentagon was spotless for a long time after the alleged 757 crashed too. And 757s do not fold back their wings back so they can fly into a small hole like a bird going into a birdhouse. That story is so stupid and yet it still brainwashed quite a few TV Huggers like yourself. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8n542k.me6.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #515657 |
Rocky wrote: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > news:9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com... >> >> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >> retarded fuckwit. > > You have never even tried to address why so little remained of the > Twin Towers and by looking at their biggest lie it is easy to see > that we were given lie after lie after lie including those clearly > scripted phone calls. > > And don't forget there is a much bigger truth and that is no 757 > crashed at the Pentagon because it was all smoke from a smoke > generator and the law of the Pentagon was spotless for a long time > after the alleged 757 crashed too. > > And 757s do not fold back their wings back so they can fly into a > small hole like a bird going into a birdhouse. That story is so > stupid and yet it still brainwashed quite a few TV Huggers like > yourself. > > Rocky why are you the only person that thinks what you say is true
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 09:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jtmdnTkqbIQvEEXInZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515692 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8n542k.me6.17.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >> news:9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com... >>> >>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >>> retarded fuckwit. >> >> You have never even tried to address why so little remained of the >> Twin Towers and by looking at their biggest lie it is easy to see >> that we were given lie after lie after lie including those clearly >> scripted phone calls. And don't forget there is a much bigger truth and >> that is no 757 >> crashed at the Pentagon because it was all smoke from a smoke >> generator and the law of the Pentagon was spotless for a long time >> after the alleged 757 crashed too. And 757s do not fold back their wings >> back so they can fly into a >> small hole like a bird going into a birdhouse. That story is so >> stupid and yet it still brainwashed quite a few TV Huggers like >> yourself. Rocky > > why are you the only person that thinks what you say is true Why are you asking loaded questions? >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 08:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8n6ouu.9lj.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #515777 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8n542k.me6.17.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>> news:9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com... >>>> >>>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >>>> retarded fuckwit. >>> >>> You have never even tried to address why so little remained of the >>> Twin Towers and by looking at their biggest lie it is easy to see >>> that we were given lie after lie after lie including those clearly >>> scripted phone calls. And don't forget there is a much bigger truth >>> and that is no 757 >>> crashed at the Pentagon because it was all smoke from a smoke >>> generator and the law of the Pentagon was spotless for a long time >>> after the alleged 757 crashed too. And 757s do not fold back their >>> wings back so they can fly into a >>> small hole like a bird going into a birdhouse. That story is so >>> stupid and yet it still brainwashed quite a few TV Huggers like >>> yourself. Rocky >> >> why are you the only person that thinks what you say is true > > Why are you asking loaded questions? why aren't you answering such an easy question
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 10:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_qSdndyLjaQ7DkXInZ2dnUU7-cGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515778 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8n6ouu.9lj.17.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8n542k.me6.17.1@news.alt.net... >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>>> news:9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com... >>>>> >>>>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >>>>> retarded fuckwit. >>>> >>>> You have never even tried to address why so little remained of the >>>> Twin Towers and by looking at their biggest lie it is easy to see >>>> that we were given lie after lie after lie including those clearly >>>> scripted phone calls. And don't forget there is a much bigger truth >>>> and that is no 757 >>>> crashed at the Pentagon because it was all smoke from a smoke >>>> generator and the law of the Pentagon was spotless for a long time >>>> after the alleged 757 crashed too. And 757s do not fold back their >>>> wings back so they can fly into a >>>> small hole like a bird going into a birdhouse. That story is so >>>> stupid and yet it still brainwashed quite a few TV Huggers like >>>> yourself. Rocky >>> >>> why are you the only person that thinks what you say is true >> >> Why are you asking loaded questions? > > why aren't you answering such an easy question Because it is a loaded question you clown. And % I'm still waiting for you to tell me what % of the Twin Towers made it to the ground. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 16:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1m9kely.6ua8nxsd24iN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #515779 |
Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Because it is a loaded question you clown. > > And % I'm still waiting for you to tell me what % of the Twin Towers > made it to the ground. > > Rocky > 100%, you clown. Any fool knows that, except you. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 12:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cedhta1oi1alai0n1vg2vbeeto0clqkvnk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515779 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 10:23:46 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:8n6ouu.9lj.17.1@news.alt.net...
>> Rocky wrote:
>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:8n542k.me6.17.1@news.alt.net...
>>>> Rocky wrote:
>>>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus"
>>>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you
>>>>>> retarded fuckwit.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have never even tried to address why so little remained of the
>>>>> Twin Towers and by looking at their biggest lie it is easy to see
>>>>> that we were given lie after lie after lie including those clearly
>>>>> scripted phone calls. And don't forget there is a much bigger truth
>>>>> and that is no 757
>>>>> crashed at the Pentagon because it was all smoke from a smoke
>>>>> generator and the law of the Pentagon was spotless for a long time
>>>>> after the alleged 757 crashed too. And 757s do not fold back their
>>>>> wings back so they can fly into a
>>>>> small hole like a bird going into a birdhouse. That story is so
>>>>> stupid and yet it still brainwashed quite a few TV Huggers like
>>>>> yourself. Rocky
>>>>
>>>> why are you the only person that thinks what you say is true
>>>
>>> Why are you asking loaded questions?
>>
>> why aren't you answering such an easy question
>
>Because it is a loaded question you clown.
>
>And % I'm still waiting for you to tell me what % of the Twin Towers made it
>to the ground.
I already answered that question, as did others. Do you honestly
think it will change if % gives the exact same answer? Are you really
as DESPERATE to avoid the truth as you present?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 12:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8n78pl.mcm.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #515779 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8n6ouu.9lj.17.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:8n542k.me6.17.1@news.alt.net... >>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>>>> news:9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you >>>>>> retarded fuckwit. >>>>> >>>>> You have never even tried to address why so little remained of the >>>>> Twin Towers and by looking at their biggest lie it is easy to see >>>>> that we were given lie after lie after lie including those clearly >>>>> scripted phone calls. And don't forget there is a much bigger >>>>> truth >>>>> and that is no 757 >>>>> crashed at the Pentagon because it was all smoke from a smoke >>>>> generator and the law of the Pentagon was spotless for a long time >>>>> after the alleged 757 crashed too. And 757s do not fold back their >>>>> wings back so they can fly into a >>>>> small hole like a bird going into a birdhouse. That story is so >>>>> stupid and yet it still brainwashed quite a few TV Huggers like >>>>> yourself. Rocky >>>> >>>> why are you the only person that thinks what you say is true >>> >>> Why are you asking loaded questions? >> >> why aren't you answering such an easy question > > Because it is a loaded question you clown. > > And % I'm still waiting for you to tell me what % of the Twin Towers > made it to the ground. > > Rocky it's not a loaded question it's a factual question and , what's this about twin towers i'm a north canadian , we don't get american news here
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 12:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pddhta56jg4v59prpvml4oj3fjnhkjg0c1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515777 |
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:58:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:8n542k.me6.17.1@news.alt.net...
>> Rocky wrote:
>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus"
>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message
>>> news:9bf9474906ace8bf4e47580538b17f73@dizum.com...
>>>>
>>>> The FBI didn't say Barbara Olson didn't speak to Ted Olson, you
>>>> retarded fuckwit.
>>>
>>> You have never even tried to address why so little remained of the
>>> Twin Towers and by looking at their biggest lie it is easy to see
>>> that we were given lie after lie after lie including those clearly
>>> scripted phone calls. And don't forget there is a much bigger truth and
>>> that is no 757
>>> crashed at the Pentagon because it was all smoke from a smoke
>>> generator and the law of the Pentagon was spotless for a long time
>>> after the alleged 757 crashed too. And 757s do not fold back their wings
>>> back so they can fly into a
>>> small hole like a bird going into a birdhouse. That story is so
>>> stupid and yet it still brainwashed quite a few TV Huggers like
>>> yourself. Rocky
>>
>> why are you the only person that thinks what you say is true
>
>Why are you asking loaded questions?
>>
>
Your avoidance is funny.
Are you going to answer the question, of continue to provide
absolute PROOF that you lack the intellect to do so?
Time will tell.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 7 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web