Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517414 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 205 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 09:33 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:42 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:04 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:48 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:26 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 22:51 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:21 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moiré pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 00:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir矰attern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 18:01 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 19:58 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:04 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 20:40 +0000
Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:59 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 21:42 +0000
Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:58 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 22:41 +0000
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 07:03 -0400
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-02 21:36 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir� pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Proof we were given a life sized Disney Cartoon) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 14:19 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 12:21 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-29 22:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:30 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:11 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:19 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:32 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:54 -0500
Re: Rocky can't hold a job jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:34 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:29 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 23:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:51 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:37 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:44 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 21:22 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 15:29 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:47 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:47 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 01:15 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:31 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:58 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 15:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 14:59 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 08:25 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-01 06:42 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 00:03 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 18:08 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:36 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:06 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 21:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 16:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky still avoids my ?) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:20 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 19:30 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:30 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:29 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 20:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:32 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:31 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:30 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:06 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 15:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:19 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:18 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:49 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 12:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:05 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:25 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:53 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 18:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 05:08 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 00:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 23:07 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 09:52 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:05 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:39 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:03 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:41 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:07 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:38 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 19:32 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:37 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 21:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:02 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 09:01 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:37 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:33 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 07:37 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:32 +0000
Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@k12.ed.music.tickling> - 2015-08-31 04:22 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 17:46 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:34 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 23:07 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:18 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:15 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:10 +0000
Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:13 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:33 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:49 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:29 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:29 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Baron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 21:02 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:18 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:45 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:17 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:01 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-03 16:32 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:49 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Baron VonLurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:20 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-01 20:42 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-09-02 00:52 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:04 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:24 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 20:30 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:38 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:46 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 21:54 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-04 00:01 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:36 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:35 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 07:41 +0200
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 23:41 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:24 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:06 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:48 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 22:00 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-04 09:39 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:15 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:19 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:02 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah now 2 Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:25 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 20:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE NoeDOTNatDOTNoe <dedanoe@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 21:32 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event |
| Message-ID | <abOdnRwET_CcIH7InZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517780 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:lq9abc-94j.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> But all you ever give me is crap from the USGS that never showed us the >> seismic readings for the violent shaking of the North Tower 12 seconds >> before it was vaporized. Here see for yourself. > > You dumb fuck piece of delusional shit, if you had actually read and > understood the links, you would know that the readings were not just > from the USGS but that ALL the readings were in agreement, you howling > kook. That doesn't matter because they could have still been told to suppress data because of "National Security." And don't forget we now have two videos of what happened in Nuke York City in the 12-14 seconds before the North Tower was vaporized. One video shows the North Tower shaking like a tuning fork and the other video shows an explosion and yet that shaking/explosion were absent from the seismic records for some reason. Plus an EMP was recorded by an AM receiver by WCBS when the explosion took place/the North Tower shook violently or what I'll start calling the pre North Tower vaporization event. And again don't forget NIST didn't even try to explain why so much at the very bottom of the Twin Towers remained standing after an alleged collapse. <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg But the following video does a great job at explaining the very high walls left standing from the Twin Towers. Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 03:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event |
| Message-ID | <1ntcbc-0ur.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518030 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:lq9abc-94j.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> But all you ever give me is crap from the USGS that never showed us the >>> seismic readings for the violent shaking of the North Tower 12 seconds >>> before it was vaporized. Here see for yourself. >> >> You dumb fuck piece of delusional shit, if you had actually read and >> understood the links, you would know that the readings were not just >> from the USGS but that ALL the readings were in agreement, you howling >> kook. > > That doesn't matter because they could have still been told to suppress data > because of "National Security." Yeah, sure they could, all the seismographs in the world, you delusional paranoid. No one outside the US gives a rat's ass about US "National Security", you raving idiot. <snip kook ravings> > Plus an EMP was recorded by an AM receiver by WCBS when the explosion took > place/the North Tower shook violently or what I'll start calling the pre > North Tower vaporization event. If nuclear devices were used, there would be an EMP for EACH device and the media uses FM for communications, you delusional, paranoid fool. There was no EMP, let alone 3 or 34 or whatever your delusional number of nukes currently is, fruitcake. > And again don't forget NIST didn't even try to explain why so much at the > very bottom of the Twin Towers remained standing after an alleged collapse. No one but delusional nut cases care why so much of the bottom was left standing, you delusional paranoid fool. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 22:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event |
| Message-ID | <t7edncdFApVOTX7InZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518046 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:1ntcbc-0ur.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:lq9abc-94j.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>> But all you ever give me is crap from the USGS that never showed us the >>>> seismic readings for the violent shaking of the North Tower 12 seconds >>>> before it was vaporized. Here see for yourself. >>> >>> You dumb fuck piece of delusional shit, if you had actually read and >>> understood the links, you would know that the readings were not just >>> from the USGS but that ALL the readings were in agreement, you howling >>> kook. >> >> That doesn't matter because they could have still been told to suppress >> data >> because of "National Security." > > Yeah, sure they could, all the seismographs in the world, you delusional > paranoid. When I looked at your links all I saw were places in the states. Go ahead and show me the link in question. BTW THERE WERE NO FCUKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE Published on Mar 22, 2014 Completed 3/22/2014 by James Easton and Steve Grage THE EPITOME OF NO PLANES FILMS on the subject. Are you a No Brainer? Then you probably believe there were PLANES on 9/11. Well... THERE WEREN'T! Produced by James Easton of WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS, creator of 9/11 The BIGGEST LIE which has 700,000 views on Youtube. Steve Grage is a credentialed ENGINEER with 25 years experience. This is no joke. Word is spreading. Pretty soon you too will be saying THERE WERE NO FUCKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! James Easton - September 20, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 05:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event |
| Message-ID | <3h5dbc-bls.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518055 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:1ntcbc-0ur.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:lq9abc-94j.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> But all you ever give me is crap from the USGS that never showed us the >>>>> seismic readings for the violent shaking of the North Tower 12 seconds >>>>> before it was vaporized. Here see for yourself. >>>> >>>> You dumb fuck piece of delusional shit, if you had actually read and >>>> understood the links, you would know that the readings were not just >>>> from the USGS but that ALL the readings were in agreement, you howling >>>> kook. >>> >>> That doesn't matter because they could have still been told to suppress >>> data >>> because of "National Security." >> >> Yeah, sure they could, all the seismographs in the world, you delusional >> paranoid. > > When I looked at your links all I saw were places in the states. Go ahead > and show me the link in question. So all the links were in the US. Only the stations close enough to New York would record what happened on 9/11 as the seismic impact of the buildings collapsing and the planes crashing were so small. Nuclear explosions would have showed up all across the planet, in every country, and on every sesimograph. Go get some professional help and the delusions might go away and you might be able to hold a job. <snip remaining delusional babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 22:54 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event |
| Message-ID | <r4qdnVtjh_G9TX7InZ2dnUU7-c2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518030 |
"Siri Cruz" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:chine.bleu-EE28AD.20374330082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu... > In article <abOdnRwET_CcIH7InZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> > You dumb fuck piece of delusional shit, if you had actually read and >> > understood the links, you would know that the readings were not just >> > from the USGS but that ALL the readings were in agreement, you howling >> > kook. >> >> That doesn't matter because they could have still been told to suppress >> data >> because of "National Security." > > You still haven't explained all the seismographs outside the US. All the reading I saw posted from the states so you will have to repost the link in question. BTW THERE WERE NO FCUKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE Published on Mar 22, 2014 Completed 3/22/2014 by James Easton and Steve Grage THE EPITOME OF NO PLANES FILMS on the subject. Are you a No Brainer? Then you probably believe there were PLANES on 9/11. Well... THERE WEREN'T! Produced by James Easton of WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS, creator of 9/11 The BIGGEST LIE which has 700,000 views on Youtube. Steve Grage is a credentialed ENGINEER with 25 years experience. This is no joke. Word is spreading. Pretty soon you too will be saying THERE WERE NO FUCKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! James Easton - September 20, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 05:34 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Rocky can't hold a job |
| Message-ID | <tk5dbc-bls.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518054 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > BTW THERE WERE NO FCUKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! Of course there were, but your delusions prevent you from seeing that. If you get some professional help, these delusions might go away and you might be able to hold a job. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event |
| Message-ID | <5gj9uapam80kgah9dno0780q982hs88vak@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #518054 |
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 22:54:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >BTW THERE WERE NO FCUKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! There certainly were planes. Btw, the white plane you keep blubbering about is NEACP, the National Emergency Airborne Command Post. http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/HL001825/e4-kneecap-aircraft http://www.rense.com/general76/missing.htm Youtube has the audio from Andrews on it's launch on 9/11 Code name that day was Venus77. I have the raw audio not the youtube stuff.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 17:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) |
| Message-ID | <JZ6dnZx_iZF5TXnInZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518288 |
"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message news:5gj9uapam80kgah9dno0780q982hs88vak@4ax.com... > On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 22:54:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>BTW THERE WERE NO FCUKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! > > There certainly were planes. You spelled CGI wrong and the following video proves there are all sorts of inconsistencies in the CGIs that we saw on TV over and over and over. Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U Oh and media tries to make buildings look weak and airplane wings look super strong. But airplane wings are designed to hold up weight and not for ramming so that is another reason we know the CGIs in Nuke York City were just CGIs. And that is in the above video too. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 18:29 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) |
| Message-ID | <82l9uahamnqr2hio50t5761hvscaek8ji1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #518292 |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:10:02 -0500, "Roger" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >news:5gj9uapam80kgah9dno0780q982hs88vak@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 22:54:33 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>BTW THERE WERE NO FCUKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! >> >> There certainly were planes. > >You Posted the truth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) |
| Message-ID | <7ecb67cdd1f24f687d68f06e31f26057@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #518292 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid delusional woman-stalking failed truck driver), in <news:JZ6dnZx_iZF5TXnInZ2dnUU7-RudnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message > news:5gj9uapam80kgah9dno0780q982hs88vak@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 22:54:33 -0500, Rocky (aka >> Roger Wittekind the schizophrenic paranoid delusional >> woman-stalking failed truck driver) <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> BTW THERE WERE NO FCUKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! Yeah, there were. Don't you get tired of being proven wrong on every single stupid thing you spew, Roger? LOL Your broken brain now shifting to the "no planes" kook conspiracy theory *in* *addition* to the thoroughly insane "nuclear demolition" kook conspiracy theory is all the proof anyone needs that your poor broken brain cannot process reality even when it's spoon-fed to you, and thus it desperately grabs at whatever it can get in trying to make sense of a world that must seem confusing and frightening for someone of such low IQ as you, Roger. LOL In fact, you're *so* fucking retarded that even after something's been explained in great detail to you, you'll come right back and continue making the same retarded k'lames that detailed explanation just blew out of the water... meaning you likely have an IQ of about 65... meaning you're clinically mentally retarded. This isn't an insult, merely a qualified observation of your demeanor. Rocky is a retard, Rocky is a retard. Neener, neener, neener. LOL >> There certainly were planes. > You spelled CGI<SMACKAKOOK!> You'll be getting right on providing links to existing equipment in 2001 that could project a solid-looking 3-D image several hundred feet in bright daylight, Kook, or you'll be forced to admit that your broken brain has yet again wholesale accepted an entirely impossible kook conspiracy theory because you're simply too stupid to process reality. Your *only* other option is that every single video taken was somehow confiscated by the government and altered... getting the most minute of details correct from a multitude of angles. And given that several personal recordings weren't made public right away (and that the government would have no way of knowing about those recordings until *after* they were made public), I'm sure even you, in the depths of your insanity, can see the utter impossibility of that option. Moron. LOL > Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U You mean that stupidity-filled "movie" (read: rant) that offered no proof whatsoever? You're devolving into utter insanity if you believe that anti-semitic schlock. I mean, really... the fireproofing project at the WTC towers was actually a scheme to plant a plane-shaped nanothermite outline on the towers? And do you realize the exacting precision a pilot would have to fly to hit that k'lamed outline? Especially so if, as you've previously k'lamed, the planes were remote controlled. And that's not even mentioning that the thermite would have blown the building chunks *outward*, not through the building... so yet again your kooky conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics because you're far too retarded to discern fantasy from reality. The white smoke was indicative of the aluminum oxide in the claimed nanothermite? It wasn't the aluminum facade burning? What does aluminum do in a fire, Ko0k? Why, its passivation layer of aluminum oxide burns off, does it not? And that gives white smoke. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIgORZt_rhw> In this video, they used water to force the metal to quickly repassivate as it burned, thus allowing the metal to burn longer and give off more smoke. Note the white smoke. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyAIgHryuwA> Pure aluminum dust being burned to give a faster burn rate. Note the white smoke. They used napalm in the tower? It wasn't the jet fuel exploding on impact? The wing disappeared? If that's the case, it would have disappeared on all the personal videos, too, right? But it didn't, did it. No, it certainly did not: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbWD_dGBIm8> Whoopsie... the wing *did* disappear... behind a cloud of smoke. Which the low-resolution camera wasn't able to differentiate from the open sky, and thus the camera's firmware "lossied" out that part of the wing... it's a digital camera artifact, nothing more. A higher-resolution video from nearly the same angle (also in that video above) *was* able to differentiate between the smoke, the wing and the sky, and the wing is clearly visible throughout. And that's from another 9/11 "inside job" kook... even those broken-brained kooks are laughing at how insane you are. Moron. LOL > Oh and media tries to make buildings look weak and airplane wings look super > strong<SMACKAKOOK!> A Boeing plane wing strength test: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Ai2HmvAXcU0> The wing went to 154% of the stresses possible in any flight situation. IOW, you could dive the thing at 600 MPH and pull out at 5 G, and the wings would survive... how do we know this? Because it's happened. Look up China Airlines Flight 006. Also research the Empire State Building airplane crash... a 10-ton Mitchell B-25 bomber at a much lower speed, not as strongly built as modern aircraft, crashed into the Empire State Building... a grid-constructed building of *much* stronger construction than the WTC towers. And it ripped a hole right through that building's outer wall (in fact,the main fuselage impact hole was spread over two floors, so the plane ripped through the flooring structural steel) and in fact some parts went right through the entire building. Exactly as happened at the WTC towers. The Empire State Building stood because it had asbestos fireproofing, plentiful structural concrete, and was of the much stronger grid construction. <http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.com/2012/09/american-airlines-77-hit-pentagon.html> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4q35xHzjxB0> Note how the F-4 Phantom jet at 500 MPH punches through the 3.66 meters thick concrete wall. Note especially the side view at 0:36 showing the wing slicing through the concrete. You'll note the plane turns to confetti, concentrates its force in a very small area, and punches through that very small area. Remember, both the thickness and the grade of steel used in the WTC towers went down as the height of the building increased. At the top, the outer truss frame members were A36 steel of only 1/4" thick. Where the first plane hit it was likely on 5/16" thick. And those truss frame members were spaced 6 feet 8 inches apart. Not a lot of metal to punch through at all. Now, for the kooks who are still disbelievers... <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc-zmb3jAgo> A ping-pong ball fired through a ping-pong paddle. Now, you're saying "Oh, but that's just a *plastic* paddle"... <http://www.popularmechanics.com/adventure/a8683/behold-the-900-mph-supersonic-ping-pong-bazooka-15097897/> Ping-pong ball through a plywood paddle. Seems impossible, but at great speeds, things aren't always intuitive. > Rocky Moron. LOL -- Roger T.E. Wittekind PO Box 471 167 40th Avenue East Moline, IL 61244 309-755-6374 309-755-6394 Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL. Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roget Wittekind. I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator" that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 23:39 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event |
| Message-ID | <DpOdnde6k4oWR37InZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518030 |
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message news:MPG.304d761ae9a408ee98ad6a@news.altopia.com... > In article <chine.bleu-EE28AD.20374330082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, > chine.bleu@yahoo.com says... > > >> >> In article <abOdnRwET_CcIH7InZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> > > You dumb fuck piece of delusional shit, if you had actually read and >> > > understood the links, you would know that the readings were not just >> > > from the USGS but that ALL the readings were in agreement, you >> > > howling >> > > kook. >> > >> > That doesn't matter because they could have still been told to suppress >> > data >> > because of "National Security." >> >> You still haven't explained all the seismographs outside the US. > > Can someone please explain why anybody is still bothering to argue with > this nut case? Is anybody expecting different results at some point? Don't forget there are two videos that show something big took place 12-14 seconds before the North Tower was vaporized that were no part of the seismograph readings. One video shows the North Tower vibrating like a tuning fork and the other video shows an explosion so why should I believe any of the seismographs that didn't report what we saw? And the fact remains. NIST or the media failed to address where the top 100 floors went because if they went down they would have crushed the walls that were left standing and crushed the dozen people that survived in Stairwell B of the North Tower. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg BTW THERE WERE NO FCUKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE Published on Mar 22, 2014 Completed 3/22/2014 by James Easton and Steve Grage THE EPITOME OF NO PLANES FILMS on the subject. Are you a No Brainer? Then you probably believe there were PLANES on 9/11. Well... THERE WEREN'T! Produced by James Easton of WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS, creator of 9/11 The BIGGEST LIE which has 700,000 views on Youtube. Steve Grage is a credentialed ENGINEER with 25 years experience. This is no joke. Word is spreading. Pretty soon you too will be saying THERE WERE NO FUCKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! James Easton - September 20, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 21:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event |
| Message-ID | <8ntbp6.du8.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #518059 |
Rocky wrote: > "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > news:MPG.304d761ae9a408ee98ad6a@news.altopia.com... >> In article >> <chine.bleu-EE28AD.20374330082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>, >> chine.bleu@yahoo.com says... >> >> >>> >>> In article <abOdnRwET_CcIH7InZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>>>> You dumb fuck piece of delusional shit, if you had actually read >>>>> and understood the links, you would know that the readings were >>>>> not just from the USGS but that ALL the readings were in >>>>> agreement, you howling >>>>> kook. >>>> >>>> That doesn't matter because they could have still been told to >>>> suppress data >>>> because of "National Security." >>> >>> You still haven't explained all the seismographs outside the US. >> >> Can someone please explain why anybody is still bothering to argue >> with this nut case? Is anybody expecting different results at some >> point? > > Don't forget there are two videos that show something big took place > 12-14 seconds before the North Tower was vaporized that were no part > of the seismograph readings. > > One video shows the North Tower vibrating like a tuning fork and the > other video shows an explosion so why should I believe any of the > seismographs that didn't report what we saw? > > And the fact remains. NIST or the media failed to address where the > top 100 floors went because if they went down they would have crushed > the walls that were left standing and crushed the dozen people that > survived in Stairwell B of the North Tower. See: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > BTW THERE WERE NO FCUKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! > > Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE > > Published on Mar 22, 2014 > > Completed 3/22/2014 > by James Easton and Steve Grage > THE EPITOME OF NO PLANES FILMS on the subject. > > Are you a No Brainer? Then you probably believe there were PLANES on > 9/11. Well... THERE WEREN'T! > > Produced by James Easton of WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS, creator of 9/11 The > BIGGEST LIE which has 700,000 views on Youtube. > > Steve Grage is a credentialed ENGINEER with 25 years experience. > > This is no joke. Word is spreading. Pretty soon you too will be > saying THERE WERE NO FUCKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! > > James Easton - September 20, 2014 > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U > > Rocky did you know there was a 9/11 and , 2 days later there was an 11/11 and , if you waited until 11:11am then it was , 11/11-11:11
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 05:37 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event |
| Message-ID | <0q5dbc-bls.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518059 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Don't forget there are two videos that show something big took place 12-14 > seconds before the North Tower was vaporized that were no part of the > seismograph readings. As they were too small to show up. If you get professional help, these delusions may go away and you might be able to hold a job, maybe even find a woman who won't respond to you with a restraining order. <snip remaining delusional raving> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 22:40 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <mrtu0f$g7i$6@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517771 |
On 8/29/2015 9:11 PM, Rocky wrote: > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:8v2abc-bei.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> on USGS Seismographs? I wonder why. >> >> The USGS is not the only entity running seismographs > But all you ever give me is crap from the USGS that never showed us the > seismic readings for the violent shaking of the North Tower 12 seconds > before it was vaporized. Here see for yourself. > >> http://www.porn.manboobs.rocky/mirrors/guardkan2/wtc/seismkc/WTC_PEkT_KIM.htm >> http://www.manboobs.org/wtc/smevidence/sekismic.html > > > Rocky, the Lying Squirrely > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 22:44 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <mrtu89$hgf$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517750 |
On 8/29/2015 7:48 PM, Rocky wrote: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mrtd9l$cie$1@pcls7.std.com... >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: <snip crap> >>>>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin >>>>> Towers were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies. >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> no it doesn't >> >>> Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual. >> NO RADIATION was detected then or now. > > >> Is that enough supporting evidence, Michael, or shall I go on? > I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know > who I am. I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial, for > shooting a my puppy dead with my 45 pistol which is my right, 12 to > 0 without an attorney present to represent me. <G> > Rocky, the lying Squirrely > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-29 21:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <MPG.304c24e58bd1773798ad5d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #517792 |
In article <mrtu89$hgf$2@speranza.aioe.org>, invalid@invalid.com says... > > On 8/29/2015 7:48 PM, Rocky wrote: > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > > news:mrtd9l$cie$1@pcls7.std.com... > >> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: > > > > <snip crap> > > > >>>>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin > >>>>> Towers were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies. > >>>>> > >>>>> Rocky > > >>>> no it doesn't > >> > >>> Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual. > >> > > > NO RADIATION was detected then or now. I think if you tell him that a few thousand more times, maybe you can convince him, and chalk up that big fat victory. Won't that be sweet? > >> Is that enough supporting evidence, Michael, or shall I go on? > > > I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know > > who I am. I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial, for > > shooting a my puppy dead with my 45 pistol which is my right, 12 to > > 0 without an attorney present to represent me. <G> > > > Rocky, the lying Squirrely > > > > -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 15:29 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <mrvp31$rl3$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #517801 |
On 8/29/2015 11:22 PM, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:
> In article <mrtu89$hgf$2@speranza.aioe.org>, invalid@invalid.com says...
>
>
>>
>> On 8/29/2015 7:48 PM, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mrtd9l$cie$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>> <snip crap>
>>
>>
>>>>>>> Sorry but a preponderance of the Evidence still says the Twin
>>>>>>> Towers were nuked and NIST lies and lies and lies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rocky
>>
>>>>>> no it doesn't
>>>>
>>>>> Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual.
>>>>
>>
>>
>> NO RADIATION was detected then or now.
>
>
> I think if you tell him that a few thousand more times, maybe you can
> convince him, and chalk up that big fat victory. Won't that be sweet?
>
>
ha ! ..... yes, I shall/will BE *WINNER*, after only a few ten
thousands or more postings.......
na, i cant win in a K0ok Kontest,
>>>> Is that enough supporting evidence, Michael, or shall I go on?
>>
>>> I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know
>>> who I am. I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial, for
>>> shooting a my puppy dead with my 45 pistol which is my right, 12 to
>>> 0 without an attorney present to represent me. <G>
>>
>>> Rocky, the lying Squirrely
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 08:34 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <de02a87ba9c84e4d15be75fa0b5623eb@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #517750 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), in <news:Ep6dne01wtVhz3_InZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:mrtd9l$cie$1@pcls7.std.com... >> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC) >> <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:8npafh.heq.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>>> Now back to the link above. Do you really think fertilizer bombs can >>>>> make great big holes in the ground when they are really just big fire >>>>> bombs? >> If you just get a fireball when setting off ANFO, you're doing it wrong. >> ANFO is widely used in quarrying and mining. It's the most used explosive >> in the United States because it's cheap and relatively safe. The Oklahoma >> City bomb was actually a more powerful variant of ANFO, ammonium nitrate+ >> nitromethane. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANFO > Ok, for the sake of the argument let us say you are right about ANFO now why > was the Alfred P. Murrah building cut like a knife instead of showing damage > from a single location? > > And why were there yellow signs in Oklahoma City that said "Radiation Area?" There wasn't. You'll be providing any non-kook-sourced proof for your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional ranting k'lames, or admit you've been caught in yet another lie, Mike. Moron. LOL >>>>> Sor<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>> no it doesn't >>>Too bad you have no supporting evidence as usual. >> Here's the evidence, Michael. > Nope, my name is not Mike, Michael or any varient of that and it never has > been. Plus a lot of people can vouch for that. No proof, so you're a lying kook. Moron. LOL >> 1) No radiation making lower Manhattan glow in the dark. Just small >> amounts from airline exit door signs and small amounts already in the >> towers. > You might want to do a google search for "9/11 radiation" before you add to > the lies from the media. This has already been explained to you: No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. Moron. LOL >> 2) No EMPs detected. All electronics would have been fried, all >> helicopters knocked out of the air, if there were any EMPs. > I'm not saying it was a horrendous EMP. It wasn't an EMP at all. *All* nuclear EMPs are "horrendous"... they blow out electronics for at least dozens of miles. It was satellite uplink interference. Moron. LOL > I'm saying that the AM receiver Wrong. It was a VHF receiver and satellite transmitter relay truck. Moron. LOL > that was receiving the video from the WCBS > chopper happened to record an EMP Wrong. It experienced satellite uplink interference, just one of 19 such interferences in the video *you* provided. Moron. LOL > at the exact same time that the ground > under WTC1 shook so violently it was caught on camera. And yet, a non-shielded consumer-grade personal video camera carried by a firefighter *inside* the WTC towers *as* *its* *column* *buckled* and thus shook, and *as* *the* *tower* *collapsed* showed absolutely no EMP... had there been an EMP, it would be evident on *every* *single* video of the event... and that would have been the very last thing we saw from those cameras. Their electronics would have blown out after that. So every video you show us of the shaking, collapse and immediate aftermath is proof that no EMP took place. Moron. LOL > To<SMACKAKOOK!> Moron. LOL >> 5) We don't have the technology, neither now nor in 1968, to dig down >> 37-96 *miles* needed to do the things you claim. > That is more total bullshit from the Friendly Neighborhood Nut and I even > gave him a link to try and correct his bullshit: Here see for yourself it > is more like 77 meters below surface level. See: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smallman12q/Nuclear_Demolition That has nothing whatsoever to do with the *fact* that the timing between your supposed "EMP" and the time the towers shook was 12 seconds, meaning those nukes would have to be buried from 37 to 96 *miles* below the towers, depending upon transmission speed of the k'lamed nuclear compressive blast through the ground (and given that it was solid bedrock, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). The EMP would have arrived essentially instantaneously, the blast would have taken more time... that time difference is used to determine the distance from your k'lamed "detonation"... and it proves the k'lamed "nukes" would have been buried far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968. Moron. LOL >> 6) 108,222 truckloads (1.5 million tons) of debris hauled out proves >> nothing was vaporized, other than a relatively small amount of smoke and >> dust. > ROTFLMAO because a lot of that was fresh dirt hauled in and radioactive dirt > hauled out. But you k'lamed they only hauled in 120 truckloads of dirt, Moron Mikey. Your brain has problems grasping the scale of things, you apparently think 120 truckloads can magically transform into 108,222 truckloads. LOL Moron. LOL > And they certainly didn't move much metal from the Twin Towers<SMACKAKOOK!> You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? Thus your kooky conspiracy theory the feeble minded rantings of a paranoid-delusional schizophrenic off his meds. Take your meds, Mike. Moron. LOL > I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know who I > am. I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an > attorney present to represent me. <G> Lying kook. You've yet again failed to provide any proof for your insane rantings. No, we've got you pegged, Mike. They're gonna lock you away in a nice padded room and pump you so full of anti-psychotics you won't even remember your own name. Michael Scott Guthrie, just FYI. Moron. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 20 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). 19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. 20) Now you're saying the Ogallala Aquifer is radioactive (what's that got to do with the WTC?)... with absolutely no proof... all you have is the paranoid delusional rantings of other schizophrenics like you. Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 20 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- ------------------------------------ Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200 sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL ------------------------------------ Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 04:45 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael |
| Message-ID | <82k5uatvtld8klrsbl6gso6dvf5oiem20h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517810 |
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:34:35 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>> I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know who I
>> am. I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an
>> attorney present to represent me. <G>
>
>Lying kook. You've yet again failed to provide any proof for your
>insane rantings. No, we've got you pegged, Mike. They're gonna lock
>you away in a nice padded room and pump you so full of anti-psychotics
>you won't even remember your own name. Michael Scott Guthrie, just
>FYI.
It may be worth noting that Rocky's name in real life is Roger
Wittekind.
Some of his ranting can be found here:
http://brokensixthamendment.com/
http://overprotectivemother.com/
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 11:39 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills |
| Message-ID | <S6udnejut5FgrH7InZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517825 |
"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:82k5uatvtld8klrsbl6gso6dvf5oiem20h@4ax.com... > On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:34:35 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote > Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> I am not called Michael or any variation of that name and people know >>> who I >>> am. I'm someone who has proven they won a jury trial 12 to 0 without an >>> attorney present to represent me. <G> >> >>Lying kook. You've yet again failed to provide any proof for your >>insane rantings. No, we've got you pegged, Mike. They're gonna lock >>you away in a nice padded room and pump you so full of anti-psychotics >>you won't even remember your own name. Michael Scott Guthrie, just >>FYI. > > It may be worth noting that Rocky's name in real life is Roger > Wittekind. > Some of his ranting can be found here: > > http://brokensixthamendment.com/ > > http://overprotectivemother.com/ And don't forget http://slimefest.com/exhibits/ Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web