Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #511157 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-04 08:26 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-08-04 16:40 -0500 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Can't we just remove carbon dioxide from the air to fix climate change? Not yet Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 08:26 -0500
Re: Can't we just remove carbon dioxide from the air to fix climate change? Not yet jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-04 17:32 +0000
Re: Can't we just remove carbon dioxide from the air to fix climate change? Not yet gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-04 16:40 -0500
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 08:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Can't we just remove carbon dioxide from the air to fix climate change? Not yet |
| Message-ID | <R4qdnYE_CYgPIF3InZ2dnUU7-YMAAAAA@giganews.com> |
Can't we just remove carbon dioxide from the air to fix climate change?
Not yet
> http://phys.org/news/2015-08-carbon-dioxide-air-climate.html
> If we have put too much CO2 into the air, wouldn't it make sense to
> find ways to remove it again? Well, yes: it would. But sadly it isn't
> likely to be easy or cheap and, according to new research, it isn't
> an adequate "solution" to the problems of climate change.
> The possible "carbon removal" techniques are very diverse. They
> include growing trees on land or algae in the sea and capturing and
> burying some of the carbon they have taken from the atmosphere. There
> are also engineered solutions that "scrub" CO2 directly from the air,
> using chemical absorbents, and then recover, purify, compress and
> liquefy it, so that it can be buried deep underground. That sounds
> difficult and expensive, and at the moment, it is.
> Both the UK Royal Society and the US National Research Council point
> out that doing it on a large enough scale to make a real difference
> would be hard. Nevertheless, a joint communiqué from UK learned
> societies recently argued that to limit global warming to 2℃ we are
> likely to need CO2 removal (CDR) rates in the latter part of this
> century that will exceed emissions at that time ("net negative
> emissions"). That will only be possible if we can deploy CDR
> technologies.
> A new paper in Nature Communications shows just how big the required
> rates of removal actually are. Even under the IPCC's most optimistic
> scenario of future CO2 emission levels (RCP2.6), in order to keep
> temperature rises below 2℃ we would have to remove from the
> atmosphere at least a few billion tons of carbon per year and maybe
> ten billion or more – depending on how well conventional mitigation
> goes.
Your reaction:
[ ] So What
[ ] It's not happening
[ ] Don't mess with my life
[ ] It's my grandkids' problem, not mine
[ ] What's a mere 2°C, So What
[ ] What's a mere 4-6°C, So What
[ ] We're Toast
--
sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 17:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ti979c-tes.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #511157 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can't we just remove carbon dioxide from the air to fix climate change?
> Not yet
Not ever, shit head.
> Your reaction:
>
> [ ] So What
> [ ] It's not happening
> [ ] Don't mess with my life
> [ ] It's my grandkids' problem, not mine
> [ ] What's a mere 2°C, So What
> [ ] What's a mere 4-6°C, So What
> [ ] We're Toast
[x] Yet more spamming FUD from the shit head.
--
Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 16:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mprbhe$v5a$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #511157 |
On 8/4/2015 8:26 AM, Sam Wormley wrote: > Can't we just remove carbon dioxide from the air to fix climate change? > Not yet > >> If we have put too much CO2 into the air, wouldn't it make sense to >> find ways to remove it again? but "we" did not. And the Plants Must Breath !!! Plants, our FOOD, Breath in CO2 and make O2 how come you global wormers do not believe in that ? failed Biology in High school ? > > Your reaction: > > [X] Artical is conjecture and lies. > [X] Fat Ass in a Cube is Making Stuff Up Again
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web