Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #702932 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 261 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-16 07:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-16 10:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:24 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 11:51 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <%@%> - 2018-09-16 08:55 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 11:09 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 10:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-16 13:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-17 05:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:57 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 09:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 14:27 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:41 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 11:48 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 19:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:50 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-18 23:55 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-18 17:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 21:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 11:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 11:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 12:03 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 13:11 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 16:05 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:46 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-19 22:21 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:07 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 09:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 10:33 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 17:59 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 16:41 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:47 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:11 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:48 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:47 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:36 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:06 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 12:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-25 10:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 16:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:20 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:58 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:04 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:42 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-21 20:51 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 15:21 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:10 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-22 10:19 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 12:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 11:45 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 19:11 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 20:44 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-20 17:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:04 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 22:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-20 18:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 16:31 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-20 22:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 09:14 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 17:59 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 23:23 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 00:02 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 17:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 05:08 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:51 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:43 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:06 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 16:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:40 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-22 20:32 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:47 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 09:27 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:58 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:03 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:23 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:50 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-21 14:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:37 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:47 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:03 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:01 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:20 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:22 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:33 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-22 00:24 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 01:17 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:05 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:41 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:35 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:07 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:56 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:15 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:50 -0400
Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 07:12 -0700
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:40 -0400
Re: Fairies, dancing on the head of a pin. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:04 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:03 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:38 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:58 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 21:14 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 16:08 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 17:27 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-22 22:50 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:37 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:43 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 14:42 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:31 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:53 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:48 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:18 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:48 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling invalid@invalid.invalid (Ï) - 2018-09-22 18:15 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:54 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:29 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:12 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:17 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:05 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-20 18:17 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:06 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:12 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:05 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 13:52 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-21 16:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:02 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:46 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 00:12 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:13 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-21 19:39 +0100
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:09 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:31 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:15 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:26 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:52 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 14:38 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-09-18 15:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 00:00 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 06:38 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-19 10:13 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 01:00 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-20 11:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:56 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:20 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 19:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 01:57 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:34 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:40 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:49 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 07:53 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:21 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 06:10 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:29 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 05:54 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-22 11:09 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-23 11:44 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:40 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 10:13 -0500
Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:14 -0700
Re: Fusion, solar, and the graviton. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:25 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 00:49 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-22 12:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 23:23 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-20 23:42 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 09:05 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-21 18:25 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:01 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-22 02:36 +0000
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-16 23:24 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 02:25 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 08:13 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 09:15 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:43 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:54 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-17 12:59 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:35 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:43 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:51 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 01:36 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 11:39 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:43 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 13:53 -0600
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:55 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-17 15:59 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-17 15:00 -0500
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:08 -0700
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-17 15:28 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:22 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-17 23:07 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-09-18 01:19 -0400
Re: Global Climate Change Effort Looks for Reboot After Stalling benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:11 -0400
Page 11 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 Next page →
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 00:00 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <sCloD.15379$LL1.4709@fx23.iad> |
| In reply to | #703390 |
On 9/18/2018 2:08 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pnrksa$1pd2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup > says... > > >> >> On 9/18/2018 3:38 PM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 9/18/2018 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> Solar? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>> >>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>> >>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>> >>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>> >>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>> >>> solar panels only last 30 years at best, some only 7yrs, some to 12 years >>> >>> then you have to make a whole new batch >> >> Sorta like nuke or fossil fueled power plants. After about 30 years, >> you have to make a whole new batch. > > And store the still highly radioactive old batch virtually forever using > half-assed temporary methods that we still haven't figured out. You reduce that problem by recycling spent uranium fuel. One trouble with recycling is that you recover plutonium, and the greenies don't like that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 06:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pnt8uu$67n$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703471 |
On 9/19/2018 2:00 AM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 9/18/2018 2:08 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pnrksa$1pd2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup >> says... >> >> >>> >>> On 9/18/2018 3:38 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 9/18/2018 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>> >>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>> >>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>> >>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>> >>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>> >>>> solar panels only last 30 years at best, some only 7yrs, some to 12 >>>> years >>>> >>>> then you have to make a whole new batch >>> >>> Sorta like nuke or fossil fueled power plants. After about 30 years, >>> you have to make a whole new batch. >> >> And store the still highly radioactive old batch virtually forever using >> half-assed temporary methods that we still haven't figured out. > > You reduce that problem by recycling spent uranium fuel. > One trouble with recycling is that you recover plutonium, > and the greenies don't like that. Recycled fuel costs 2-3 times as much as unrecycled fuel. The gumment has to get the taxpayer to cover the cost differential. Free market capitalists are fine with that as long as the money comes from po' folk but then po' folk can't get their kitchen cabinets refaced or buy jets and yachts so that destroys the economy and makes billionaires sad, which is a very very bad thing. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 10:13 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vAuoD.117135$Ac3.100600@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #703486 |
On 9/19/2018 4:38 AM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 9/19/2018 2:00 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 9/18/2018 2:08 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> yup@ayup.yup says... >>>> On 9/18/2018 3:38 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 9/18/2018 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>> >>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>>> >>>>> solar panels only last 30 years at best, some only 7yrs, >>>>> some to 12 years >>>>> >>>>> then you have to make a whole new batch >>>> >>>> Sorta like nuke or fossil fueled power plants. After about >>>> 30 years, you have to make a whole new batch. >>> >>> And store the still highly radioactive old batch virtually forever using >>> half-assed temporary methods that we still haven't figured out. >> >> You reduce that problem by recycling spent uranium fuel. >> One trouble with recycling is that you recover plutonium, >> and the greenies don't like that. > > Recycled fuel costs 2-3 times as much as unrecycled fuel. Is that the initial cost, or the life-cycle cost including the present value of the cost to store spent fuel for hundreds of years?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 01:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po29tq$b89$19@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703486 |
"mixed nuts" <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote in message news:pnt8uu$67n$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 9/19/2018 2:00 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 9/18/2018 2:08 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pnrksa$1pd2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup >>> says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 9/18/2018 3:38 PM, Sergio wrote: >>>>> On 9/18/2018 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>> >>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>>> >>>>> solar panels only last 30 years at best, some only 7yrs, some to 12 >>>>> years >>>>> >>>>> then you have to make a whole new batch >>>> >>>> Sorta like nuke or fossil fueled power plants. After about 30 years, >>>> you have to make a whole new batch. >>> >>> And store the still highly radioactive old batch virtually forever using >>> half-assed temporary methods that we still haven't figured out. >> >> You reduce that problem by recycling spent uranium fuel. >> One trouble with recycling is that you recover plutonium, >> and the greenies don't like that. > > Recycled fuel costs 2-3 times as much as unrecycled fuel. The gumment has > to get the taxpayer to cover the cost differential. Free market > capitalists are fine with that as long as the money comes from po' folk > but then po' folk can't get their kitchen cabinets refaced or buy jets and > yachts so that destroys the economy and makes billionaires sad, which is a > very very bad thing. Closer to 1.3-1.7 times as much, but overall far better for the environment by reducing long term toxic contamination and drastically reducing the need to mine new uranium. Further by switching to a fast breeder design, the need to recycle used fuel rods would drop drastically as the fuel rods would remain viable for a far longer period of time. Of course, nuclear is not an option for the greenies, as they find it preferable to simply export the pollution to another country and then pretend it doesn't occur. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 01:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po29tq$b89$18@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703390 |
"Checkmate" <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote in message news:MPG.360afb1bb7b959a1994a36@news.altopia.com... > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pnrksa$1pd2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup > says... > > >> >> On 9/18/2018 3:38 PM, Sergio wrote: >> > On 9/18/2018 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> >> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >> >>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >> >>>> Solar? >> >>>> >> >>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >> >>> >> >>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >> >>> >> >>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >> >>> >> >>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >> >> >> >> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >> > >> > solar panels only last 30 years at best, some only 7yrs, some to 12 >> > years >> > >> > then you have to make a whole new batch >> >> Sorta like nuke or fossil fueled power plants. After about 30 years, >> you have to make a whole new batch. > > And store the still highly radioactive old batch virtually forever using > half-assed temporary methods that we still haven't figured out. Or fire back up the National Nuclear Reclamation Plant closed under Carter following the Salt II treaty and process our nuclear wastes cutting it's hazardous life down to something on the close order of 250 years, while recovering fuel elements needed for future nuclear needs. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-20 11:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <po0q88$4rm$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #703387 |
x-no-archive: yes On 9/18/2018 12:49 PM, Dinsdale wrote: > On 9/18/2018 3:38 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 9/18/2018 12:48 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> Solar? >>>>> >>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>> >>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>> >>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>> >>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>> >>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >> >> solar panels only last 30 years at best, some only 7yrs, some to 12 years >> >> then you have to make a whole new batch > > Sorta like nuke or fossil fueled power plants. After about 30 years, > you have to make a whole new batch. Yet it can't even power a golf cart, jajaja.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-20 23:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po29to$b89$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703366 |
"Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... > On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>> Solar? >>> >>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >> >> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >> >>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >> >> For now but eventually these should be electric. > > Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a reasonable measure. Indeed, I suspect until you can fit a Mr. Fusion to your mobile machine......electric isn't really going to be a good option. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 08:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po2pq0$1at4$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703780 |
On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: > > > "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message > news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> Solar? >>>> >>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>> >>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>> >>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>> >>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >> >> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? > > Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a > reasonable measure. https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle-illinois-90008/ How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link before you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tbpf7f-vvi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703812 |
In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >> >> >> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> Solar? >>>>> >>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>> >>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>> >>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>> >>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>> >>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >> >> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >> reasonable measure. > > https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle-illinois-90008/ > > How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link before > you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to do with recharging mining equipment? In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; it is going diesel electric like trains. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 13:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <WqbpD.21735$oH2.7140@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #703863 |
On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> Solar? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>> >>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>> >>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>> >>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>> >>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>> >>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>> reasonable measure. >> >> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle-illinois-90008/ >> >> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link before >> you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? > > How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to do > with recharging mining equipment? > > In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; > it is going diesel electric like trains. That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles are diesel vehicles.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 19:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7auf7f-noj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #703880 |
In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: > On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>> >>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>> >>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>> >>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>> >>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>> >>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>> reasonable measure. >>> >>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle-illinois-90008/ >>> >>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link before >>> you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >> >> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to do >> with recharging mining equipment? >> >> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >> it is going diesel electric like trains. > > That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, > that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, > only bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. > To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those > vehicles are diesel vehicles. I was going to make a comment about this being blazingly obvious, then I realized just how clueless these eco warriors are. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 17:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po3ok5$14qv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703892 |
On 9/21/2018 3:44 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote: >> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>> >>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>>> >>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>>> reasonable measure. >>>> >>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle-illinois-90008/ >>>> >>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link before >>>> you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >>> >>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to do >>> with recharging mining equipment? >>> >>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >>> it is going diesel electric like trains. >> >> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, >> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, >> only bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. >> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those >> vehicles are diesel vehicles. > > I was going to make a comment about this being blazingly obvious, then I > realized just how clueless these eco warriors are. > > Large earth moving equipment has been diesel-electric for MANY years. The reason is simple. Unlike a differential in a car that drives two wheels and when one wheel spins the other looses all torque, large earth moving gear has electric motors that drive EACH wheel. Then if one wheel loses traction and spins all other wheels keep supplying torque to drive forward. This is obviously WAY too much engineering for green warriors to understand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 01:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <po47i5$d3v$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703880 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: > On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>> >>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>> >>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>> >>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>> >>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>> >>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>> reasonable measure. >>> >>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- illinois-90008/ >>> >>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link before >>> you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >> >> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to do >> with recharging mining equipment? >> >> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >> it is going diesel electric like trains. > > That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, > that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only > bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. > To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles > are diesel vehicles. Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the diesel tank and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there and replaced with a battery and bam, it's electric. Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3amg7f-bkm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #704000 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: > >> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>> >>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>>> >>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>>> reasonable measure. >>>> >>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- > illinois-90008/ >>>> >>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link before >>>> you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >>> >>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to do >>> with recharging mining equipment? >>> >>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >>> it is going diesel electric like trains. >> >> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, >> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only >> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. >> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles >> are diesel vehicles. > > Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the diesel tank > and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there and replaced with > a battery and bam, it's electric. > > Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. How about never absent a blinding new advancement in battery techonology? Just like fusion power; any day now for the last half century or so. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 03:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <po4dja$bcv$3@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #704015 |
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:34:11 +0000, jimp wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >> >>> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>>>> >>>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>>>> reasonable measure. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- >> illinois-90008/ >>>>> >>>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link >>>>> before you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >>>> >>>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to >>>> do with recharging mining equipment? >>>> >>>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >>>> it is going diesel electric like trains. >>> >>> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, >>> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only >>> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. >>> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles >>> are diesel vehicles. >> >> Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the diesel >> tank and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there and >> replaced with a battery and bam, it's electric. >> >> Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. > > How about never absent a blinding new advancement in battery > techonology? Perhaps you were not paying attention when kensi posted a link to an article about the Purdue University scientists who just MADE that blinding new advancement? She only posted it about three times. Here it is again: https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable- battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html Think maybe you might be able to actually retain some information from it if you read it a fourth time? Or, at the VERY least, learn how to correctly spell the word "technology"? -- Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 01:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po4l7g$79j$28@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704024 |
"Libtard" <libtard@sandernistas.edu> wrote in message news:po4dja$bcv$3@news.mixmin.net... > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:34:11 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... >>>>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Solar? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a >>>>>>> reasonable measure. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- >>> illinois-90008/ >>>>>> >>>>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link >>>>>> before you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? >>>>> >>>>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to >>>>> do with recharging mining equipment? >>>>> >>>>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; >>>>> it is going diesel electric like trains. >>>> >>>> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, >>>> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only >>>> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. >>>> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles >>>> are diesel vehicles. >>> >>> Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the diesel >>> tank and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there and >>> replaced with a battery and bam, it's electric. >>> >>> Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. >> >> How about never absent a blinding new advancement in battery >> techonology? > > Perhaps you were not paying attention when kensi posted a link to an > article about the Purdue University scientists who just MADE that blinding > new advancement? She only posted it about three times. > > Here it is again: > > https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable-battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html What part of "could provide " do you think established they MADE that new advancement? Could provide, means it's a possibility at this point.....NOTHING MORE. Further are you aware of how MUCH electrolyte it would take to even equal the power capacity of an ordinary Telsa battery pack? Over 130 GALLONS.................... Then you have to consider that these electrolytes are caustic and extremely toxic, and any release into the passenger compartment means serious injury or death, and any release into the environment is a major HazMat spell, likely leading to roads being shut down, waterways being highly polluted, plants and animals poisoned, and so on. Further, if we look at the ordinary gasoline pump it pumps, at most, 10 gallons per minute.....with over 130 gallons to pump.....I don't see spending a quarter of an hour at the pump as "instantaneous". I wouldn't even classify it as "fast". --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 07:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po5ag5$1afr$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704045 |
On 9/22/2018 1:49 AM, Scout wrote: > any release into the environment is a major HazMat spell, likely leading > to roads being shut down, waterways being highly polluted, plants and > animals poisoned, and so on. Because that's *never* happened with fossil fuels, right? Oh, wait. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-25 23:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pof4ih$mn1$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704079 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:po5ag5$1afr$3@gioia.aioe.org... > On 9/22/2018 1:49 AM, Scout wrote: >> any release into the environment is a major HazMat spell, likely leading >> to roads being shut down, waterways being highly polluted, plants and >> animals poisoned, and so on. > > Because that's *never* happened with fossil fuels, right? > > Oh, wait. Yes, it has happened, but fossil fuels are significantly less toxic and naturally break down fairly quickly. A whole lot different than something that is going to poison the soil for decades, and remain a constant source of this toxin as it slowly leeches out of the soil with each rain. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 06:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pof7ro$mhp$49@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704628 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 23:21:55 -0400, Scout wrote: > "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:po5ag5$1afr$3@gioia.aioe.org... >> On 9/22/2018 1:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>> any release into the environment is a major HazMat spell, likely >>> leading to roads being shut down, waterways being highly polluted, >>> plants and animals poisoned, and so on. >> >> Because that's *never* happened with fossil fuels, right? >> >> Oh, wait. > > Yes, it has happened, but fossil fuels are significantly less toxic and > naturally break down fairly quickly. > > A whole lot different than something that is going to poison the soil > for decades, and remain a constant source of this toxin as it slowly > leeches out of the soil with each rain. https://www.dw.com/en/exxon-valdez-oil-spill-a-long-painful-recovery/ a-17515818 https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/exxon-valdez-oil-spill-recovery- still-is-work-in-progress-20-years-later/ Consider yourself spanked. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 00:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.360f8f3dbf67c223994b7d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #704024 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <po4dja$bcv$3@news.mixmin.net>, libtard@sandernistas.edu says... > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 02:34:11 +0000, jimp wrote: > > > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:01 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: > >> > >>> On 9/21/2018 12:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> On 9/20/2018 11:46 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "Just Wondering" <JW@me.com> wrote in message > >>>>>> news:mTaoD.57860$OM2.43987@fx37.iad... > >>>>>>> On 9/18/2018 3:57 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 9/17/2018 11:15 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Solar? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hmmm... and do so by burning coal to produce the panels, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> No, use solar to produce the panels, like the Gigafactory. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> and use diesel to power all the mining equipment > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> For now but eventually these should be electric. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Eventually being the key word. How many years away is eventually? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Replace years with decades and you might be starting to have a > >>>>>> reasonable measure. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://www.rtoinsider.com/charging-stations-ev-electric-vehicle- > >> illinois-90008/ > >>>>> > >>>>> How many times are we going to have to spank you with this link > >>>>> before you stop foaming about the EV adoption timeline? > >>>> > >>>> How many more times are you going to post a link that has nothing to > >>>> do with recharging mining equipment? > >>>> > >>>> In actuallity, heavy earth moving equipment IS going electric; > >>>> it is going diesel electric like trains. > >>> > >>> That technology uses a diesel engine burning diesel fuel, > >>> that turns an onboard generator (think your car's alternator, only > >>> bigger) that powers electric motors, that turn the wheels. > >>> To call that an electric vehicle is a polite fiction. Those vehicles > >>> are diesel vehicles. > >> > >> Right up until the battery tech gets good enough, and then the diesel > >> tank and engine and alternator get yanked right out of there and > >> replaced with a battery and bam, it's electric. > >> > >> Give it ten years. Fifteen, tops. > > > > How about never absent a blinding new advancement in battery > > techonology? > > Perhaps you were not paying attention when kensi posted a link to an > article about the Purdue University scientists who just MADE that blinding > new advancement? She only posted it about three times. > > Here it is again: > > https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2017/Q2/instantly-rechargeable- > battery-could-change-the-future-of-electric-and-hybrid-automobiles.html > > Think maybe you might be able to actually retain some information from it > if you read it a fourth time? Or, at the VERY least, learn how to > correctly spell the word "technology"? Without peeking, let me guess... a capacitor "battery"? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web