Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #520809 > unrolled thread

Re: 9/11 - The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7

Started by"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
First post2015-09-13 16:38 -0500
Last post2015-09-13 23:43 +0000
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: 9/11 - The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 16:38 -0500
    Re: Rocky still insane jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 23:43 +0000

#520809 — Re: 9/11 - The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7

From"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Date2015-09-13 16:38 -0500
SubjectRe: 9/11 - The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7
Message-ID<eMidnZyd38WFcGjInZ2dnUU7-cOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message 
news:mt4lb8$5cv$1@dont-email.me...
>
> The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4dU_p9UTTs

Thanks for that video about WTC7 because I can prove that everything NIST 
claimed about the Twin Towers was also complete and udder bullshit.

But this is more than just one video it is a series of videos in a playlist:

NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#520865 — Re: Rocky still insane

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2015-09-13 23:43 +0000
SubjectRe: Rocky still insane
Message-ID<t9ehcc-afo.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#520809
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Thanks for that video about WTC7 because I can prove that everything NIST 
> claimed about the Twin Towers was also complete and udder bullshit.

You have proved nothing other than you are insane and delusional, kook.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web