Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #644321 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-08-03 22:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-08-05 09:55 -0700 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 24 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 4 lines, 4 states. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-08-03 22:11 -0700
Re: 4 lines, 4 states. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-08-03 22:47 -0700
Re: 4 lines, 4 states. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-08-03 22:52 -0700
Re: Mozilla ThunderBird. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-08-04 10:43 -0700
Re: FizzBuzz is a trick question. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-08-04 11:47 -0700
Re: Michael Glasser, Steve Carroll, Marek Novotny, Branimir Maksimovic, etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-08-04 12:51 -0700
Re: I'm the best c coder here. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-08-04 14:03 -0700
Re: I'm the best c coder here. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-08-04 23:15 +0000
Re: I'm the best c coder here. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-04 19:35 -0400
Re: I'm the best c coder here. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-08-05 16:08 +0000
Re: Fabian seldom writes code, much less test it. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-08-05 03:09 +0000
Re: 2 lines, 2^2 states, easily modified to 3^2 states. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-08-05 05:42 +0000
Re: Fabian seldom writes code, much less test it. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-08-05 13:37 +0000
Re: Fabian seldom writes code, much less test it. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-08-05 14:25 +0000
Re: I'm the best c coder here. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-08-05 03:22 +0000
Re: I'm _still_ the best c coder here. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-08-05 06:12 +0000
Re: Owl's FizBuzGozKaz branches 5 times more often. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-08-05 15:40 +0000
Re: I'm _still_ the best c coder here. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-05 22:16 +0000
Re: I increment things at the _start_ of a loop. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-07 03:24 +0000
Re: I increment things at the _start_ of a loop. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-08-06 20:35 -0700
Re: "while ( x++ < 100 )" isn't "obscure". moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-07 04:59 +0000
Re: I'm the best c coder here. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-08-07 06:59 -0500
Re: Michael Glasser, Steve Carroll, Marek Novotny, Branimir Maksimovic, etc. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2017-08-05 11:52 -0400
Re: Michael Glasser, Steve Carroll, Marek Novotny, Branimir Maksimovic, etc. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-08-05 09:55 -0700
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 04:59 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: "while ( x++ < 100 )" isn't "obscure". |
| Message-ID | <om8s3n$40l$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #644892 |
Jeff-Relf.Me @. writes: >> > I increment things at the _start_ of a loop, >> > not at the end, hence: while ( x++ < 100 ) >> >> If I was the hiring manager, >> I'd take points off for unnecessary obscurity. >"while ( x++ < 100 )" isn't "obscure"; >people do stuff at the _start_ of a loop. Starting off with "x = 0;" is obscure, or rather misleading. If you do something for each integer from 1 to 100, you start at 1. Like I said, for a half a second I was about to mention you had a bug, the code calculates FizzBuzz for 0, but that was misleading; you don't. Looking like you have a bug is almost as bad as having a bug, at least to the hiring manager looking for someone who can write good, maintainable, quality code.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-07 06:59 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: I'm the best c coder here. |
| Message-ID | <aalgoch1e180r76m45q6u9foh32mbmfkbp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #644463 |
owl wrote: > Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >> Owl failed to write concise, readable code; > >Says the man who chose to use the least readable construct >in the C language. You're talking to a nut-job who thinks that "white space" is bad. It makes the code less compact, you see. -- "(chrisv) claims (Relf's) code is shitty. Let's see him substantiate it with some facts and a code analysis." - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", regarding this mess: http://jeff-relf.me/X.ZIP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-05 11:52 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Glasser, Steve Carroll, Marek Novotny, Branimir Maksimovic, etc. |
| Message-ID | <3cqboct5kpjru96cqm26jfe5q1k3dh1a01@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #644393 |
On Fri, 04 Aug 2017 12:31:43 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ): >> If I really wanted it to work better, though, >> I would have it write to file every 1000 lines or so >> -- but never bothered to do that. :) > >Even that optimization would do more harm than good, I think. >Try it, and time it; it wouldn't be faster, I bet. > >> Of course if I presented that for a PROGRAMMING job >> they would laugh their asses off at me and ask why >> I am not using an actual programming language! > >Well... it tells them: > > Michael Glasser is an AppleScript guy. > > Steve Carroll is all about JavaScript. > > Marek Novotny is a command line jockey. > > Branimir Maksimovic is a DownToTheMetal Assembly Language guy. > > Owl, Fabian and Jeff Relf are c programmers. >You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ): > If I really wanted it to work better, though, > I would have it write to file every 1000 lines or so > -- but never bothered to do that. :) Even that optimization would do more harm than good, I think. Try it, and time it; it wouldn't be faster, I bet. > Of course if I presented that for a PROGRAMMING job > they would laugh their asses off at me and ask why > I am not using an actual programming language! Well... it tells them: Michael Glasser is an AppleScript guy. Steve Carroll is all about JavaScript. Marek Novotny is a command line jockey. Branimir Maksimovic is a DownToTheMetal Assembly Language guy. Owl, Fabian and Jeff Relf are c programmers. Jeff, why do you insist on using people's real names in your posts? Are you just trying to be an asshole in addition to being the weirdest guy on Usenet? If a guy wants to be known as Melzzz for instance, you might as well refer to that under that name unless you hate his guts. Do you hate Melzzzz's guts? -- Doomsdrzej EFF & OpenMedia member, TheRebel.media & Infowars supporter Linux: The Chrysler of operating systems.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-05 09:55 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Michael Glasser, Steve Carroll, Marek Novotny, Branimir Maksimovic, etc. |
| Message-ID | <D5AB4689.AEEB3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #644557 |
On 8/5/17, 8:52 AM, in article 3cqboct5kpjru96cqm26jfe5q1k3dh1a01@4ax.com, "Doomsdrzej" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On Fri, 04 Aug 2017 12:31:43 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. wrote: > >> >> You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ): >>> If I really wanted it to work better, though, >>> I would have it write to file every 1000 lines or so >>> -- but never bothered to do that. :) >> >> Even that optimization would do more harm than good, I think. >> Try it, and time it; it wouldn't be faster, I bet. >> >>> Of course if I presented that for a PROGRAMMING job >>> they would laugh their asses off at me and ask why >>> I am not using an actual programming language! >> >> Well... it tells them: >> >> Michael Glasser is an AppleScript guy. >> >> Steve Carroll is all about JavaScript. >> >> Marek Novotny is a command line jockey. >> >> Branimir Maksimovic is a DownToTheMetal Assembly Language guy. >> >> Owl, Fabian and Jeff Relf are c programmers. >> You ( Michael Glasser ) replied ( to me ): > If I really wanted it to work >> better, though, > I would have it write to file every 1000 lines or so > -- >> but never bothered to do that. :) Even that optimization would do more harm >> than good, I think. Try it, and time it; it wouldn't be faster, I bet. > Of >> course if I presented that for a PROGRAMMING job > they would laugh their >> asses off at me and ask why > I am not using an actual programming language! >> Well... it tells them: Michael Glasser is an AppleScript guy. Steve Carroll >> is all about JavaScript. Marek Novotny is a command line jockey. Branimir >> Maksimovic is a DownToTheMetal Assembly Language guy. Owl, Fabian and Jeff >> Relf are c programmers. > > Jeff, why do you insist on using people's real names in your posts? > Are you just trying to be an asshole in addition to being the weirdest > guy on Usenet? It is an odd habit and a bit rude, but it is NOWHERE near the level of your name calling... and your referencing me by my location and one of my business names. THAT is you being an "asshole". > If a guy wants to be known as Melzzz for instance, you might as well > refer to that under that name unless you hate his guts. Do you hate > Melzzzz's guts? Unless you are a complete and utter hypocrite (which you are) you will refer to me as "Snit" from now on... if at all. But, as noted, you ARE a complete and utter hypocrite. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web