Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #524744 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-05 15:31 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-10-06 12:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 18 on this page of 158 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 15:31 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 11:32 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 13:11 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 14:58 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-06 16:16 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:09 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-06 10:41 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 14:59 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 15:50 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-06 21:17 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-06 16:50 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-06 18:50 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-06 16:32 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 00:31 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 18:11 +1100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 05:47 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 17:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 19:15 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 19:59 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 20:04 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 21:17 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 22:18 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 15:59 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 18:03 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-08 20:18 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 20:18 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 23:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 05:21 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 10:31 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 17:07 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-08 17:13 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 18:18 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-08 20:23 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 23:58 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 12:54 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-09 09:09 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 19:44 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 12:31 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-09 09:04 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 14:39 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 20:13 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 19:33 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-09 17:10 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 19:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 18:36 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:37 -0500
Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-10 08:01 -0400
Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 13:34 -0500
Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 20:11 -0400
Re: Debunking DWEEBunkers "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-11 04:06 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-10 15:41 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 13:35 -0500
HOH versus OCO noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 16:38 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 20:14 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-11 03:56 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-10 23:07 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-11 01:49 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-11 04:14 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-11 13:28 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-13 15:21 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-13 17:03 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 09:34 +1100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-15 02:52 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-14 04:28 +0200
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-15 02:50 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 04:30 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-15 02:50 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-15 03:55 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-15 09:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-15 09:59 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-15 18:11 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-16 17:51 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-18 06:36 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-18 06:45 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 14:07 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-19 15:15 +0000
p.m is cOOl noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 15:17 -0700
Re: p.m is cOOl noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 19:24 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-17 18:17 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-18 06:53 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-18 07:11 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 14:07 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 10:37 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-18 11:27 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-18 14:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 20:21 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-19 14:45 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 10:37 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-15 20:18 +0200
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 03:46 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-15 14:34 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-16 23:52 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-17 01:56 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-17 05:53 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-17 09:55 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-17 17:15 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-17 12:22 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-17 13:16 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 10:36 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 14:29 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 04:00 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-17 06:05 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-17 10:56 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-17 17:21 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-17 14:47 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-17 15:07 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-17 21:03 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-17 16:16 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-17 23:19 +0100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-17 18:20 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 15:43 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-13 21:18 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-15 02:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 13:52 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-10 19:45 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 21:43 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 00:01 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 05:28 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-09 04:39 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 08:42 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:37 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:13 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 10:25 +1100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 23:02 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 14:51 +1100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-08 10:52 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-07 17:12 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 20:05 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 21:13 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-08 09:02 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-08 10:57 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 17:08 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 08:46 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 10:30 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 12:29 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-09 13:48 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-09 16:27 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 20:18 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 20:40 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 20:43 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-07 21:16 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-07 22:23 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-08 03:02 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 14:54 +1100
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-08 04:58 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-08 10:54 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-08 16:55 +0000
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-09 10:30 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 04:37 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-10 11:44 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-10 13:35 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-11 10:20 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 09:32 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 17:07 -0400
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 20:28 -0700
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 15:38 -0500
Re: Debunking Popular Mechanics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-07 04:09 -0500
p.m noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 12:09 -0700
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 21:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <augb1bd3groskj53gbo0n0uh18c2onjr8v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525186 |
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:43:47 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:12:30 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> In article <0v791bdn0fle2r271qqhoc6g4n32ql3hvc@4ax.com>, >>> ninety7gt@cox.net says... >>>> >>>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 16:32:54 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:MPG.307de425c2fa572798c31a@news.giganews.com... >>>>>> In article <georgewk10-87873C.10411606102015@news.toast.net>, >>>>>> georgewk10 @yahoo.com says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In article <LImdnXolA4_rQ4_LnZ2dnUU7-LudnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is interesting that there are a lot of sites that debunk >>>>>>>> Popular Mechanics in their failed attempt to explain why a >>>>>>>> building that could have >>>>>>>> been nuked can fall straight down through what should have been >>>>>>>> the path of >>>>>>>> the most resistance. >>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Either way even though I think things were left out of the >>>>>>>> following from AE >>>>>>>> 911 truth the following still catches a lot of the bullshit that >>>>>>>> Popular >>>>>>>> Mechanics placed on the Internet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Debunking Popular Mechanics >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/676-debunking-popular- >>>>>>>> mechanics.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Google ; 9/11 Truth or >>>>>>> visit my fav. site; >>>>>>> www.ae911truth.org/ >>>>>>> No steel framed building has ever fallen from fire alone. >>>>>>> Now, you know why the EPA declared the air on 9/12 safe. >>>>>>> They didn't want to test it, Might find thermite. IMHO >>>>>> >>>>>> The thermite claim is total nonsense. But you, deep down inside, >>>>>> know that.. >>>>> >>>>> jet fuel = black smoke >>>>> thermate = white smoke >>>> >>>> Leaves = white smoke. >>>> Trees = white smoke. >>>> my woodstove = white smoke. >>>> >>>> I guess my woodstove burned down the World Trade Center? >>> >>> Their confusion about white smoke would help explain their beliefs in >>> "Chemtrails". >> >> All the nutballs seem to believe in the same lunacy. You almost wish >> they'd diversify a bit and be somewhat interesting. > > > > > >9/11 FAKE PLANES ...WITH EXPERT RETIRED PILOT JOHN LEAR >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN0UPcgfS5I John Lear was long ago discredited. He's as kooky as you Bast.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 22:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mv4jti$pj4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #525190 |
Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:43:47 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:12:30 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <0v791bdn0fle2r271qqhoc6g4n32ql3hvc@4ax.com>, >>>> ninety7gt@cox.net says... >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 16:32:54 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:MPG.307de425c2fa572798c31a@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-87873C.10411606102015@news.toast.net>, >>>>>>> georgewk10 @yahoo.com says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In article <LImdnXolA4_rQ4_LnZ2dnUU7-LudnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is interesting that there are a lot of sites that debunk >>>>>>>>> Popular Mechanics in their failed attempt to explain why a >>>>>>>>> building that could have >>>>>>>>> been nuked can fall straight down through what should have been >>>>>>>>> the path of >>>>>>>>> the most resistance. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Either way even though I think things were left out of the >>>>>>>>> following from AE >>>>>>>>> 911 truth the following still catches a lot of the bullshit that >>>>>>>>> Popular >>>>>>>>> Mechanics placed on the Internet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Debunking Popular Mechanics >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/676-debunking-popular- >>>>>>>>> mechanics.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Google ; 9/11 Truth or >>>>>>>> visit my fav. site; >>>>>>>> www.ae911truth.org/ >>>>>>>> No steel framed building has ever fallen from fire alone. >>>>>>>> Now, you know why the EPA declared the air on 9/12 safe. >>>>>>>> They didn't want to test it, Might find thermite. IMHO >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The thermite claim is total nonsense. But you, deep down inside, >>>>>>> know that.. >>>>>> >>>>>> jet fuel = black smoke >>>>>> thermate = white smoke >>>>> >>>>> Leaves = white smoke. >>>>> Trees = white smoke. >>>>> my woodstove = white smoke. >>>>> >>>>> I guess my woodstove burned down the World Trade Center? >>>> >>>> Their confusion about white smoke would help explain their beliefs in >>>> "Chemtrails". >>> >>> All the nutballs seem to believe in the same lunacy. You almost wish >>> they'd diversify a bit and be somewhat interesting. >> >> >> >> >> >> 9/11 FAKE PLANES ...WITH EXPERT RETIRED PILOT JOHN LEAR >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN0UPcgfS5I > > John Lear was long ago discredited. He's as kooky as you Bast. Discredited ? What ? did they ground all the lear jets that his company designed ??? I guess they never passed the safety tests of being able to fly cleanly through steel/concrete office towers/buildings, huh ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 03:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sv2hec-m36.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #525203 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:43:47 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >> John Lear was long ago discredited. He's as kooky as you Bast. > > > > Discredited ? > What ? did they ground all the lear jets that his company designed ??? John Lear is a well known kook and had nothing to do with Lear Corporation. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 14:54 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <g4qb1b5jl3it41hbpdddpe11sc9potrtb6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525214 |
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 03:02:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:43:47 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: > > >>> >>> John Lear was long ago discredited. He's as kooky as you Bast. >> >> >> >> Discredited ? >> What ? did they ground all the lear jets that his company designed ??? > >John Lear is a well known kook and had nothing to do with Lear Corporation. That would be William Powell "Bill" Lear. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear Has Bast been caught out lying again? Or is she just as dumb as a box of rocks? Shill #2 -- Deja Moo - The nagging sense that you've heard all this bullshit before.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 04:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sn9hec-ap6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #525223 |
In sci.physics Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 03:02:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:43:47 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>> John Lear was long ago discredited. He's as kooky as you Bast. >>> >>> >>> >>> Discredited ? >>> What ? did they ground all the lear jets that his company designed ??? >> >>John Lear is a well known kook and had nothing to do with Lear Corporation. > > That would be William Powell "Bill" Lear. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear > > Has Bast been caught out lying again? Or is she just as dumb as a box of rocks? Dumb as a box of rocks and delusional. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 10:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30804db6260e215898c32d@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525223 |
In article <g4qb1b5jl3it41hbpdddpe11sc9potrtb6@4ax.com>, gov.shill@gmail.com says... > > On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 03:02:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > >In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:43:47 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >>> wrote: > > > > > >>> > >>> John Lear was long ago discredited. He's as kooky as you Bast. > >> > >> > >> > >> Discredited ? > >> What ? did they ground all the lear jets that his company designed ??? > > > >John Lear is a well known kook and had nothing to do with Lear Corporation. > > That would be William Powell "Bill" Lear. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear > > Has Bast been caught out lying again? Or is she just as dumb as a box of rocks? > > Shill #2 That guy should have been bitch slapped for his part in the development and sale of the 8 track tape cartridge. The wow and flutter was horrible. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 16:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <spjiec-8gb.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #525271 |
In sci.physics BDK <Control@worldcontrol.com> wrote: > In article <g4qb1b5jl3it41hbpdddpe11sc9potrtb6@4ax.com>, > gov.shill@gmail.com says... >> >> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 03:02:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> >In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:43:47 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> >>> wrote: >> > >> > >> >>> >> >>> John Lear was long ago discredited. He's as kooky as you Bast. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Discredited ? >> >> What ? did they ground all the lear jets that his company designed ??? >> > >> >John Lear is a well known kook and had nothing to do with Lear Corporation. >> >> That would be William Powell "Bill" Lear. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear >> >> Has Bast been caught out lying again? Or is she just as dumb as a box of rocks? >> >> Shill #2 > > That guy should have been bitch slapped for his part in the development > and sale of the 8 track tape cartridge. The wow and flutter was > horrible. True, but they were a hell of an improvement over record players in cars. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-09 10:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3081999e117b064698c32f@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525279 |
In article <spjiec-8gb.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > > In sci.physics BDK <Control@worldcontrol.com> wrote: > > In article <g4qb1b5jl3it41hbpdddpe11sc9potrtb6@4ax.com>, > > gov.shill@gmail.com says... > >> > >> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 03:02:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> > >> >In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Sarah Ehrett wrote: > >> >>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:43:47 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > >> >>> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> >>> > >> >>> John Lear was long ago discredited. He's as kooky as you Bast. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Discredited ? > >> >> What ? did they ground all the lear jets that his company designed ??? > >> > > >> >John Lear is a well known kook and had nothing to do with Lear Corporation. > >> > >> That would be William Powell "Bill" Lear. > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear > >> > >> Has Bast been caught out lying again? Or is she just as dumb as a box of rocks? > >> > >> Shill #2 > > > > That guy should have been bitch slapped for his part in the development > > and sale of the 8 track tape cartridge. The wow and flutter was > > horrible. > > True, but they were a hell of an improvement over record players in cars. > Well, I guess, but they still sounded like shit. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 04:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v2nh1bpi8pod93vfkodn5ct1n35htjjtpf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525427 |
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:30:39 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
[...]
>> >> >John Lear is a well known kook and had nothing to do with Lear Corporation.
>> >>
>> >> That would be William Powell "Bill" Lear.
>> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear
>> >>
>> >> Has Bast been caught out lying again? Or is she just as dumb as a box of rocks?
>> >>
>> >> Shill #2
>> >
>> > That guy should have been bitch slapped for his part in the development
>> > and sale of the 8 track tape cartridge. The wow and flutter was
>> > horrible.
>>
>> True, but they were a hell of an improvement over record players in cars.
>>
>
>Well, I guess, but they still sounded like shit.
I hear there's some new thing called a "cassette tape" that's all
the rage on the east coast. Humph. It'll never replace the 8 track.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 11:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3082fc612d40d93898c339@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525574 |
In article <v2nh1bpi8pod93vfkodn5ct1n35htjjtpf@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:30:39 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > [...] > > >> >> >John Lear is a well known kook and had nothing to do with Lear Corporation. > >> >> > >> >> That would be William Powell "Bill" Lear. > >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear > >> >> > >> >> Has Bast been caught out lying again? Or is she just as dumb as a box of rocks? > >> >> > >> >> Shill #2 > >> > > >> > That guy should have been bitch slapped for his part in the development > >> > and sale of the 8 track tape cartridge. The wow and flutter was > >> > horrible. > >> > >> True, but they were a hell of an improvement over record players in cars. > >> > > > >Well, I guess, but they still sounded like shit. > > I hear there's some new thing called a "cassette tape" that's all > the rage on the east coast. Humph. It'll never replace the 8 track. I had an argument with the salesman when I was buying my first cassette deck for my car. He was playing an 8-Track while we were going at it, it was warbling away, while he's claiming it sounded better. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-10 13:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7jmi1bl7b9j5a79413suakhsnfino91mfc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525591 |
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:44:26 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <v2nh1bpi8pod93vfkodn5ct1n35htjjtpf@4ax.com>,
>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:30:39 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> >> >John Lear is a well known kook and had nothing to do with Lear Corporation.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> That would be William Powell "Bill" Lear.
>> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Has Bast been caught out lying again? Or is she just as dumb as a box of rocks?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Shill #2
>> >> >
>> >> > That guy should have been bitch slapped for his part in the development
>> >> > and sale of the 8 track tape cartridge. The wow and flutter was
>> >> > horrible.
>> >>
>> >> True, but they were a hell of an improvement over record players in cars.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Well, I guess, but they still sounded like shit.
>>
>> I hear there's some new thing called a "cassette tape" that's all
>> the rage on the east coast. Humph. It'll never replace the 8 track.
>
>I had an argument with the salesman when I was buying my first cassette
>deck for my car. He was playing an 8-Track while we were going at it, it
>was warbling away, while he's claiming it sounded better.
I don't think I've ever heard an 8 track. If they were still in
production when I began paying attention to music, I managed to miss
out.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-11 10:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30843a4dfc5108a798c33e@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525618 |
In article <7jmi1bl7b9j5a79413suakhsnfino91mfc@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:44:26 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > >In article <v2nh1bpi8pod93vfkodn5ct1n35htjjtpf@4ax.com>, > >compuelf@gmail.com says... > >> > >> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:30:39 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> >> >> >John Lear is a well known kook and had nothing to do with Lear Corporation. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> That would be William Powell "Bill" Lear. > >> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lear > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Has Bast been caught out lying again? Or is she just as dumb as a box of rocks? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Shill #2 > >> >> > > >> >> > That guy should have been bitch slapped for his part in the development > >> >> > and sale of the 8 track tape cartridge. The wow and flutter was > >> >> > horrible. > >> >> > >> >> True, but they were a hell of an improvement over record players in cars. > >> >> > >> > > >> >Well, I guess, but they still sounded like shit. > >> > >> I hear there's some new thing called a "cassette tape" that's all > >> the rage on the east coast. Humph. It'll never replace the 8 track. > > > >I had an argument with the salesman when I was buying my first cassette > >deck for my car. He was playing an 8-Track while we were going at it, it > >was warbling away, while he's claiming it sounded better. > > I don't think I've ever heard an 8 track. If they were still in > production when I began paying attention to music, I managed to miss > out. When the cart was brand new, they were tolerable, but as they aged and the lube stuff they used dried out, they WOWed, and fluttered so badly it amazed me how bad it would get before a friend of mine would finally retire the cart to the trash can. Playing a steady tone on a top end 8 Track tape deck was was bad as it was on a $10 cassette recorder. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 09:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ssmdnecE4eY644vLnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525203 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mv4jti$pj4$1@dont-email.me... > > > Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:43:47 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:12:30 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <0v791bdn0fle2r271qqhoc6g4n32ql3hvc@4ax.com>, >>>>> ninety7gt@cox.net says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 16:32:54 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:MPG.307de425c2fa572798c31a@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-87873C.10411606102015@news.toast.net>, >>>>>>>> georgewk10 @yahoo.com says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In article <LImdnXolA4_rQ4_LnZ2dnUU7-LudnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is interesting that there are a lot of sites that debunk >>>>>>>>>> Popular Mechanics in their failed attempt to explain why a >>>>>>>>>> building that could have >>>>>>>>>> been nuked can fall straight down through what should have been >>>>>>>>>> the path of >>>>>>>>>> the most resistance. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Either way even though I think things were left out of the >>>>>>>>>> following from AE >>>>>>>>>> 911 truth the following still catches a lot of the bullshit that >>>>>>>>>> Popular >>>>>>>>>> Mechanics placed on the Internet. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Debunking Popular Mechanics >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/676-debunking-popular- >>>>>>>>>> mechanics.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Google ; 9/11 Truth or >>>>>>>>> visit my fav. site; >>>>>>>>> www.ae911truth.org/ >>>>>>>>> No steel framed building has ever fallen from fire alone. >>>>>>>>> Now, you know why the EPA declared the air on 9/12 safe. >>>>>>>>> They didn't want to test it, Might find thermite. IMHO >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The thermite claim is total nonsense. But you, deep down inside, >>>>>>>> know that.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> jet fuel = black smoke >>>>>>> thermate = white smoke >>>>>> >>>>>> Leaves = white smoke. >>>>>> Trees = white smoke. >>>>>> my woodstove = white smoke. >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess my woodstove burned down the World Trade Center? >>>>> >>>>> Their confusion about white smoke would help explain their beliefs in >>>>> "Chemtrails". >>>> >>>> All the nutballs seem to believe in the same lunacy. You almost wish >>>> they'd diversify a bit and be somewhat interesting. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 9/11 FAKE PLANES ...WITH EXPERT RETIRED PILOT JOHN LEAR >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN0UPcgfS5I >> >> John Lear was long ago discredited. He's as kooky as you Bast. > > > > > > > > Discredited ? > What ? did they ground all the lear jets that his company designed ??? > > I guess they never passed the safety tests of being able to fly cleanly > through steel/concrete office towers/buildings, huh ? Talking about discredited. NIST has no credibility, Popular Mechanic not only has no credibility but even Michael from sci.physics isn't happy with them. And where is the credulity from the Media? Gone as soon as they tried to tell people that a jet landed at the Pentagon and made a whole in the building but didn't leave any parts anywhere but inside the building. <G> And I could go on and on and on. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 17:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <romd1b9879mcevo8u51kaqf2qj0fg3vdm8@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #525203 |
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:23:37 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >Sarah Ehrett wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:43:47 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:12:30 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <0v791bdn0fle2r271qqhoc6g4n32ql3hvc@4ax.com>, >>>>> ninety7gt@cox.net says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 16:32:54 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:MPG.307de425c2fa572798c31a@news.giganews.com... >>>>>>>> In article <georgewk10-87873C.10411606102015@news.toast.net>, >>>>>>>> georgewk10 @yahoo.com says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In article <LImdnXolA4_rQ4_LnZ2dnUU7-LudnZ2d@giganews.com>, >>>>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is interesting that there are a lot of sites that debunk >>>>>>>>>> Popular Mechanics in their failed attempt to explain why a >>>>>>>>>> building that could have >>>>>>>>>> been nuked can fall straight down through what should have been >>>>>>>>>> the path of >>>>>>>>>> the most resistance. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Either way even though I think things were left out of the >>>>>>>>>> following from AE >>>>>>>>>> 911 truth the following still catches a lot of the bullshit that >>>>>>>>>> Popular >>>>>>>>>> Mechanics placed on the Internet. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Debunking Popular Mechanics >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/676-debunking-popular- >>>>>>>>>> mechanics.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Google ; 9/11 Truth or >>>>>>>>> visit my fav. site; >>>>>>>>> www.ae911truth.org/ >>>>>>>>> No steel framed building has ever fallen from fire alone. >>>>>>>>> Now, you know why the EPA declared the air on 9/12 safe. >>>>>>>>> They didn't want to test it, Might find thermite. IMHO >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The thermite claim is total nonsense. But you, deep down inside, >>>>>>>> know that.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> jet fuel = black smoke >>>>>>> thermate = white smoke >>>>>> >>>>>> Leaves = white smoke. >>>>>> Trees = white smoke. >>>>>> my woodstove = white smoke. >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess my woodstove burned down the World Trade Center? >>>>> >>>>> Their confusion about white smoke would help explain their beliefs in >>>>> "Chemtrails". >>>> >>>> All the nutballs seem to believe in the same lunacy. You almost wish >>>> they'd diversify a bit and be somewhat interesting. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 9/11 FAKE PLANES ...WITH EXPERT RETIRED PILOT JOHN LEAR >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN0UPcgfS5I >> >> John Lear was long ago discredited. He's as kooky as you Bast. > > >Discredited ? Yep. posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 01:38 AM John Lear goes through phases where it always ends with him totally withdrawing from society and the media and retiring. But he can't help himself. It is like he NEEDS to bull# about UFO'S and all his other pet-subjects and after a while he starts to creep back into the media. Then he builds and builds until he realizes he has made a complete ass of himself, can't support any of it and gets tired of being attacked with questions he can't answer....and he retires again. I am not surprised his wiki page is gone. It totally fits his pattern ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 20:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f97797f4-7995-4459-b288-56d9a57450ca@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #525186 |
how do you tell a chemtrail from a contrail; tricky > >> "Chemtrails". > > > > All the nutballs seem to believe in the same lunacy. You almost wish > > they'd diversify a bit and be somewhat interesting. > > > > > > 9/11 FAKE PLANES ...WITH EXPERT RETIRED PILOT JOHN LEAR > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN0UPcgfS5I
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 15:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fO6dnadNtP4ISYvLnZ2dnUU7-ROdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #525213 |
If you are asking me. I look at the sheer number of jets in the sky because around here there shouldn't be more than one jet at a time and besides modern jets are setup so even if they do leave a contrail they don't hang around after the jet is long gone. "noTthaTguY" <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> wrote in message news:f97797f4-7995-4459-b288-56d9a57450ca@googlegroups.com... > how do you tell a chemtrail from a contrail; > tricky > >> >> "Chemtrails". >> > >> > All the nutballs seem to believe in the same lunacy. You almost wish >> > they'd diversify a bit and be somewhat interesting. >> >> >> >> >> >> 9/11 FAKE PLANES ...WITH EXPERT RETIRED PILOT JOHN LEAR >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN0UPcgfS5I >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-07 04:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <aao91b1057nrvhus8m353fq53n9qfumfb7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #524929 |
On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:41:16 -0700, Shoe-Chucker 2
<georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <LImdnXolA4_rQ4_LnZ2dnUU7-LudnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> It is interesting that there are a lot of sites that debunk Popular
>> Mechanics in their failed attempt to explain why a building that could have
>> been nuked can fall straight down through what should have been the path of
>> the most resistance.
>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>> Either way even though I think things were left out of the following from AE
>> 911 truth the following still catches a lot of the bullshit that Popular
>> Mechanics placed on the Internet.
>>
>> Debunking Popular Mechanics
>> http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/676-debunking-popular-
>> mechanics.html
>
>Google ; 9/11 Truth or
>visit my fav. site;
>www.ae911truth.org/
And laugh at the errors, disinformation and outright lies
presented.
>No steel framed building has ever fallen from fire alone.
And no one claims otherwise.
>Now, you know why the EPA declared the air on 9/12 safe.
The dust, especially asbestos dust, and such. Old news.
>They didn't want to test it, Might find thermite. IMHO
That's fine, as far as an opinion goes. But your opinion is in
direct opposition to the known and established facts.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-06 12:09 -0700 |
| Subject | p.m |
| Message-ID | <9a67e9f9-dafe-4170-9c40-2562623e2930@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #524744 |
the only resistemce, given the catastrophic loss of tensional integrity, is a) > been nuked can fall straight down through what should have been the path of > the most resistance. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Either way even though I think things were left out of the following from AE > 911 truth the following still catches a lot of the bullshit that Popular > Mechanics placed on the Internet. > > Debunking Popular Mechanics > http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/676-debunking-popular-mechanics.html
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web