Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #514641 > unrolled thread

Re: Rocky's beliefs ( about maazim's straw man arguments)

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Rocky's beliefs ( about maazim's straw man arguments) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 08:28 -0500
    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( about maazim's straw man arguments) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 16:19 +0100
      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( 2 t-annoy ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:38 -0500
        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( 2 t-annoy ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-18 20:40 +0200
          Re: Rocky's beliefs ( needs photo of mushroom cloud at GZ ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:26 -0500
          Re: Rocky's beliefs ( mushroom cloud from GZ ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:49 -0500
            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( mushroom cloud from GZ ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:48 -0500
              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( mushroom cloud from GZ ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:41 +0100
              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( mushroom cloud from GZ ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 18:03 +0000
              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( mushroom cloud from GZ ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:06 -0500
              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( mushroom cloud from GZ ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-20 07:54 +0200
          Re: Rocky's beliefs ( photo of hypocenter ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 19:08 -0500
            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( photo of hypocenter ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 06:57 +0200
              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( photo of hypocenter 4 FNV ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 09:22 -0500
                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( photo of hypocenter 4 FNV ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-20 17:26 +0000
                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( photo of hypocenter 4 FNV ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:52 +0200
                  Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 16:49 -0500
                    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Apollyon <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 14:59 -0700
                    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 15:08 -0700
                    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-20 22:37 +0000
                      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 09:00 -0500
                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-21 15:00 +0000
                          Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Michael M is a TV Hugger ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:46 -0500
                            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Michael M is a TV Hugger ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:50 +0000
                            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Michael M is a TV Hugger ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:10 -0500
                            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Michael M is a TV Hugger ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-23 03:35 +0000
                            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Michael M is a TV Hugger ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 10:43 -0500
                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 18:06 +0000
                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:09 -0500
                    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:57 -0500
                    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 04:58 +0200
                      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-21 07:32 +0200
                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 08:39 -0400
                          Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-21 21:38 +0200
                            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:13 -0400
                              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-25 07:13 +0200
                                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 04:09 -0500
                                  Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-25 23:47 +0200
                                    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:14 -0500
                                      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-26 06:46 +0200
                                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 03:57 -0500
                                          Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-26 21:25 +0200
                                            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:12 -0500
                                              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-28 05:16 +0200
                                                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 04:17 -0500
                                                  Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-28 19:10 +0200
                                                    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:36 -0500
                                                      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-02 07:41 +0200
                                                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
                                    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:58 -0700
                                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 06:51 -0400
                      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 10:00 -0500
                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 19:55 +0200
                          Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:51 -0500
                            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 14:59 -0700
                              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:37 -0500
                                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:11 -0700
                                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:11 -0500
                              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 21:34 -0700
                            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:17 +0200
                            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:11 -0500
                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 18:08 +0000
                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:15 -0500
                          Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:59 +0200
                            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:11 -0500
                            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:30 -0500
                              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:45 +0000
                              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:51 -0500
                              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:48 -0700
                              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( Advice to FNN ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:02 +0200
                                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( ?s 4 Friendly Neighborhood Nut ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:48 -0500
                                  Re: Rocky's beliefs ( ?s 4 Friendly Neighborhood Nut ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 04:22 +0200
                                  Re: Rocky's beliefs ( ?s 4 Friendly Neighborhood Nut ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:13 +0000
                                  Re: Rocky's beliefs ( ?s 4 Friendly Neighborhood Nut ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 08:20 -0500
                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( photo of hypocenter 4 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:56 -0500
            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( photo of hypocenter ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 21:00 +0200
          Re: Rocky's beliefs ( 2 t-annoy ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:08 -0500
    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( about maazim's straw man arguments #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:43 -0500
      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( about maazim's straw man arguments #2) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 18:33 +0100
      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( about maazim's straw man arguments #2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:45 +0000
      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( about maazim's straw man arguments #2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 18:08 +0000
        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( about maazim's straw man arguments #2) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 19:40 +0100
          Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:28 -0500
            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:09 +0100
              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:17 -0500
                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:41 +0100
                  Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:48 -0500
                    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:21 +0000
                    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 08:14 -0500
                      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 08:51 -0500
                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:40 +0000
                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 07:43 -0500
                      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-25 09:04 -0700
                        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:16 -0500
                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:03 +0000
            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:01 +0000
              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 10:09 -0700
    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( about maazim's straw man arguments) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:44 +0000

Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]

#514751 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( about maazim's straw man arguments #2)

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Are you telling me that all jets can easily change the flight number in 
> their transponder in mid air?  And if so what is your source?

Transponders do not transmit flight numbers, they transmit a 4 digit octal
number assigned by ATC which can and often does change over the course
of a long flight, kook.

Here's a picture of a transponder, kook. Notice the 4 knobs to set the
4 digits above the knobs, kook.

http://avionicsmasters.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/k/t/kt-78.jpg

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514761 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( about maazim's straw man arguments #2)

On 17/08/2015 19:08, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Are you telling me that all jets can easily change the flight number in
>> their transponder in mid air?  And if so what is your source?
>
> Transponders do not transmit flight numbers, they transmit a 4 digit octal
> number assigned by ATC which can and often does change over the course
> of a long flight, kook.
>
> Here's a picture of a transponder, kook. Notice the 4 knobs to set the
> 4 digits above the knobs, kook.
>
> http://avionicsmasters.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/k/t/kt-78.jpg
>

Don't confuse him with facts.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514785 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:mqt9n3$4b7$2@dont-email.me...
> On 17/08/2015 19:08, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Are you telling me that all jets can easily change the flight number in
>>> their transponder in mid air?  And if so what is your source?
>>
>> Transponders do not transmit flight numbers, they transmit a 4 digit 
>> octal
>> number assigned by ATC which can and often does change over the course
>> of a long flight, kook.
>>
>> Here's a picture of a transponder, kook. Notice the 4 knobs to set the
>> 4 digits above the knobs, kook.
>>
>> http://avionicsmasters.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/k/t/kt-78.jpg
>>
>
> Don't confuse him with facts.

Ok, so they didn't have to reboot their transponder to show up as a 
different jet but if they did it too quickly they could have arose suspicion 
so I still suspect they tried to be sneaky about the flight number change of 
the original Flight 175.

And that would also explain why the wing of the alleged flight 175 faded in 
and out exactly like it was a cheap CGI programmed to reflect the sky.  <G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514803 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

On 17/08/2015 20:28, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:mqt9n3$4b7$2@dont-email.me...
>> On 17/08/2015 19:08, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are you telling me that all jets can easily change the flight number in
>>>> their transponder in mid air?  And if so what is your source?
>>>
>>> Transponders do not transmit flight numbers, they transmit a 4 digit
>>> octal
>>> number assigned by ATC which can and often does change over the course
>>> of a long flight, kook.
>>>
>>> Here's a picture of a transponder, kook. Notice the 4 knobs to set the
>>> 4 digits above the knobs, kook.
>>>
>>> http://avionicsmasters.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/k/t/kt-78.jpg
>>>
>>
>> Don't confuse him with facts.
>
> Ok, so they didn't have to reboot their transponder to show up as a
> different jet but if they did it too quickly they could have arose suspicion
> so I still suspect they tried to be sneaky about the flight number change of
> the original Flight 175.


About turn.


>
> And that would also explain why the wing of the alleged flight 175 faded in
> and out exactly like it was a cheap CGI programmed to reflect the sky.  <G>
>
> Rocky
>
>


????

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514808 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:mqteu2$ssi$1@dont-email.me...
> On 17/08/2015 20:28, Rocky wrote:
>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> news:mqt9n3$4b7$2@dont-email.me...
>>> On 17/08/2015 19:08, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Are you telling me that all jets can easily change the flight number 
>>>>> in
>>>>> their transponder in mid air?  And if so what is your source?
>>>>
>>>> Transponders do not transmit flight numbers, they transmit a 4 digit
>>>> octal
>>>> number assigned by ATC which can and often does change over the course
>>>> of a long flight, kook.
>>>>
>>>> Here's a picture of a transponder, kook. Notice the 4 knobs to set the
>>>> 4 digits above the knobs, kook.
>>>>
>>>> http://avionicsmasters.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/k/t/kt-78.jpg
>>>>
>>>
>>> Don't confuse him with facts.
>>
>> Ok, so they didn't have to reboot their transponder to show up as a
>> different jet but if they did it too quickly they could have arose 
>> suspicion
>> so I still suspect they tried to be sneaky about the flight number change 
>> of
>> the original Flight 175.
>
> About turn.

BFD all you did was point out it would have been even easier to fly away as 
another flight number.  DUH.


>> And that would also explain why the wing of the alleged flight 175 faded 
>> in
>> and out exactly like it was a cheap CGI programmed to reflect the sky. 
>> <G>

>
> ????

The wing of the alleged flight 175 that faded in and out can only be 
recreated by 3D software where the 3D jet is programmed to reflect the sky. 
See:

9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM?
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514821 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

On 17/08/2015 21:17, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:mqteu2$ssi$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 17/08/2015 20:28, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mqt9n3$4b7$2@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 17/08/2015 19:08, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you telling me that all jets can easily change the flight number
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> their transponder in mid air?  And if so what is your source?
>>>>>
>>>>> Transponders do not transmit flight numbers, they transmit a 4 digit
>>>>> octal
>>>>> number assigned by ATC which can and often does change over the course
>>>>> of a long flight, kook.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a picture of a transponder, kook. Notice the 4 knobs to set the
>>>>> 4 digits above the knobs, kook.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://avionicsmasters.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/k/t/kt-78.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Don't confuse him with facts.
>>>
>>> Ok, so they didn't have to reboot their transponder to show up as a
>>> different jet but if they did it too quickly they could have arose
>>> suspicion
>>> so I still suspect they tried to be sneaky about the flight number change
>>> of
>>> the original Flight 175.
>>
>> About turn.
>
> BFD all you did was point out it would have been even easier to fly away as
> another flight number.  DUH.
>
>

All I did was prove you did not know how transponders work.

>>> And that would also explain why the wing of the alleged flight 175 faded
>>> in
>>> and out exactly like it was a cheap CGI programmed to reflect the sky.
>>> <G>
>
>>
>> ????
>
> The wing of the alleged flight 175 that faded in and out can only be
> recreated by 3D software where the 3D jet is programmed to reflect the sky.
> See:
>
> 9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM?
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg
>
> Rocky
>
>

So there could be no other reason if in fact it did happen.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514824 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:mqtgqd$3t9$5@dont-email.me...
> On 17/08/2015 21:17, Rocky wrote:
>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> news:mqteu2$ssi$1@dont-email.me...
>>> On 17/08/2015 20:28, Rocky wrote:
>>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:mqt9n3$4b7$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>> On 17/08/2015 19:08, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you telling me that all jets can easily change the flight number
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> their transponder in mid air?  And if so what is your source?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Transponders do not transmit flight numbers, they transmit a 4 digit
>>>>>> octal
>>>>>> number assigned by ATC which can and often does change over the 
>>>>>> course
>>>>>> of a long flight, kook.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's a picture of a transponder, kook. Notice the 4 knobs to set 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> 4 digits above the knobs, kook.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://avionicsmasters.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/k/t/kt-78.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't confuse him with facts.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so they didn't have to reboot their transponder to show up as a
>>>> different jet but if they did it too quickly they could have arose
>>>> suspicion
>>>> so I still suspect they tried to be sneaky about the flight number 
>>>> change
>>>> of
>>>> the original Flight 175.
>>>
>>> About turn.
>>
>> BFD all you did was point out it would have been even easier to fly away 
>> as
>> another flight number.  DUH.
>>
>>
>
> All I did was prove you did not know how transponders work.
>
>>>> And that would also explain why the wing of the alleged flight 175 
>>>> faded
>>>> in
>>>> and out exactly like it was a cheap CGI programmed to reflect the sky.
>>>> <G>
>>
>>>
>>> ????
>>
>> The wing of the alleged flight 175 that faded in and out can only be
>> recreated by 3D software where the 3D jet is programmed to reflect the 
>> sky.
>> See:
>>
>> 9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM?
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>
> So there could be no other reason if in fact it did happen.

True and not only did it happen it happened in a lot of videos where they 
didn't even point out the fact the wing had disappeared.

Plus if you look at all the videos and stories from the debunkers including 
the Ediot on alt.conspiracy none of them jive so they all debunk each other. 
Pretty funny huh?

The fact remains. the perimeter walls of the Twin Towers were too thick for 
a jet to fly right into them and I wanted FNV to give me a link to that data 
but he ran away instead.  And you forgot to point out FNV was being evasive. 
<G>

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514846 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> The fact remains. the perimeter walls of the Twin Towers were too thick for 
> a jet to fly right into them and I wanted FNV to give me a link to that data 
> but he ran away instead.  And you forgot to point out FNV was being evasive. 

The walls of the Twin Towers were not structural and designed to do little
more than hold up the windows, kook.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516738 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

> The fact remains. the perimeter walls of the Twin Towers were too thick for
> a jet to fly right into them

wrong. Walls carried no weight.


hey Rocky, how come you are always Wrong ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516745 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

"gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
news:mrhpne$2is$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>
>> The fact remains. the perimeter walls of the Twin Towers were too thick 
>> for
>> a jet to fly right into them
>
> wrong. Walls carried no weight.

Those lies obviously came from NIST because they were full of it too.

Check out the videos at the end this post because they use things that were 
broadcast in Nuke York City when the Twin Towers were being built.

Basically you could remove 25% of the core columns part of the perimeter 
columns and it would still withstand a 100 mph wind.  In other word one jet 
shouldn't have done what they did to the Twin Towers and NIST had to lie and 
lie and lie to make people think the Twin Towers were made out of cardboard.

The Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516799 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> 
> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message 
> news:mrhpne$2is$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>>
>>> The fact remains. the perimeter walls of the Twin Towers were too thick 
>>> for
>>> a jet to fly right into them
>>
>> wrong. Walls carried no weight.
> 
> Those lies obviously came from NIST because they were full of it too.

Nope, those truths come from common construction practices.

<snip remaining lunatic ravings>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#517395 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

On 8/25/2015 8:51 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "gilber34" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
> news:mrhpne$2is$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>>
>>> The fact remains. the perimeter walls of the Twin Towers were too thick
>>> for
>>> a jet to fly right into them
>>
>> wrong. Walls carried no weight.
>
> Those lies obviously came from NIST because they were full of it too.


wrong, they are not lies, and they came from New York Port Authority

>
> Check out the videos at the end this post because they use things that were
> broadcast in Nuke York City when the Twin Towers were being built.



>
> Basically you could remove 25% of the core columns part of the perimeter
> columns and it would still withstand a 100 mph wind.

wrong, the core is structural.

> In other word one jet
> shouldn't have done what they did to the Twin Towers


says you, an internet buffoon kook, 15 years later, looking at utube 
vids....


> The Collapse Initiation Sequence Questionable:
>   https://www.youBoobies.com/watchmyAss?v=zvCuMUbigusLutHs&list=PLm5UJ3idickusgmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516779 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

In article <mrhpne$2is$1@speranza.aioe.org>,
 gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:

> > The fact remains. the perimeter walls of the Twin Towers were too thick for
> > a jet to fly right into them
> 
> wrong. Walls carried no weight.
> 
> 
> hey Rocky, how come you are always Wrong ?

Hey, Rocky, how come you stimulate us to question the "Official " lies?
has everyone seen this vid. ?
www.rememberingbuilding7.org/
-- 
Karma ; what a concept!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516926 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:04:39 -0700, Shoe-Chucker 2
<georgewk10@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <mrhpne$2is$1@speranza.aioe.org>,
> gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>> > The fact remains. the perimeter walls of the Twin Towers were too thick for
>> > a jet to fly right into them
>> 
>> wrong. Walls carried no weight.
>> 
>> 
>> hey Rocky, how come you are always Wrong ?
>
>Hey, Rocky, how come you stimulate us to question the "Official " lies?

     To call the various Troofer lies official is a bit much.

>has everyone seen this vid. ?
>www.rememberingbuilding7.org/

     I saw it. Pure k00k babble. Nothing more.
     But then, babble is all any follower of the Troofer religion can
offer.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514835 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> BFD all you did was point out it would have been even easier to fly away as 
> another flight number.  DUH.

There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC, kook.

<snip remaining kook babble>

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514834 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Ok, so they didn't have to reboot their transponder to show up as a 
> different jet but if they did it too quickly they could have arose suspicion 
> so I still suspect they tried to be sneaky about the flight number change of 
> the original Flight 175.

There is no such thing as rebooting a transponder as they are very
dumb devices, kook.

Transponders do not transmit flight numbers, kook.

The code on a transponder can be changed at any time, kook.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transponder_%28aeronautics%29

<snip remaining kook babble>

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#516809 — Re: Rocky's beliefs ( t-annoy - cheap CGI)

transponder was not problemmatic, as I recall.

the problem was whn Trickier dicK (he was in the Nixon admiN
with Don R.) when he called-off the fighter-plane responders,
which usually do scramble on such occaisions

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#514738

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> and the fact that most of the Twin Towers floated away as ultra fine debris. 
> I used to have a lot of links to photos of the debris cloud the day after 
> 9/11 but it seems google doesn't want me to see them anymore but I'll keep 
> looking even if I have to find the ones I used before.

Nothing floated away, kook.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every eismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers was detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web