Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #557922 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-29 10:13 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-02 14:36 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 33 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 10:13 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 12:36 -0600
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 10:57 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-29 14:13 -0600
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 12:58 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 21:29 +0000
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 15:00 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 17:32 -0600
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 15:31 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 20:16 -0600
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-01 00:01 +0000
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:08 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 00:53 +0000
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:14 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:21 +0000
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:35 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-05 13:06 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 13:52 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:07 +0000
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:28 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:44 +0000
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 19:38 +0000
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 11:52 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-01 21:46 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 01:41 -0500
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-01 23:31 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 07:22 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 13:33 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 16:25 -0600
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 14:45 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 20:19 -0600
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 15:10 -0800
Re: A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-02 14:36 -0800
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 10:13 -0800 |
| Subject | A Lesson in Contrarian Thinking From James McGinn |
| Message-ID | <013d58fd-b279-4b67-ab4a-48777da66ce0@googlegroups.com> |
A great scientist was once asked how they know they've made a breakthrough. Her response was illustrative. She responded, "When everybody says you are wrong and nobody can explain why or how you are wrong." The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths. For example, suppose we were to go back in time 200 years to any small town in Europe. Suppose somebody scoured the bible and came to the conclusion that XXX was not shown to be wrong. The person might then attempt to explain this to other people in the community. At first he would find that person after person would tell him that he must be mistaken, they would tell him it is in the bible. If he pressed the issue people would become increasingly emotional (sound familiar). Eventually a priest would get involved, present a sermon in which he (the priest) declared that he had examined the issue and found that XXX is actually in the bible. The priest would then urge all the parishioners to ignore, or harass the "denier". Eventually they might excommunicate or even murder this person. There is no gaseous H2O in earth's atmosphere. Convection has nothing to do with atmospheric flow. Meteorologists are ignorant about the physics of atmospheric flow. The fact that you simpletons get all emotional and can't produce any substantive dispute with any of this shows that "cold steam" and convection are just group delusions. Stop whining and admit that you have no substantive dispute, you imbeciles.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 12:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <X5GdnUIgfKIhEknLnZ2dnUU7-WkAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #557922 |
On 2/29/16 12:13 PM, James McGinn wrote: > The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths. In this case, all the physics has be tested and found to be correct: Water vapour (H2O) like Oxygen (O2) like Nitrogen (N2) is an invisible gas. There is nothing to see. > Water vapour (H2O molecules) > Water vapor, water vapour or aqueous vapor, is the *gaseous phase* of > water. It is one state of water within the hydrosphere. Water vapor > can be produced from the *evaporation or boiling of liquid water* or > from the *sublimation of ice* . Unlike other forms of water, water > vapor is invisible. Under typical atmospheric conditions, water vapor > is continuously generated by evaporation and removed by condensation. > It is *lighter than air* and *triggers convection currents* that can > lead to clouds. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 10:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e085e264-477e-4379-8799-ba3f27317539@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #557933 |
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:36:47 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 2/29/16 12:13 PM, James McGinn wrote: > > The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths. > > In this case, all the physics has be tested and found to be correct: Apparently not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 14:13 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nb28s1$onn$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #557942 |
On 2/29/2016 12:57 PM, James McGinn wrote: > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:36:47 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: >> On 2/29/16 12:13 PM, James McGinn wrote: >>> The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths. >> >> In this case, all the physics has be tested and found to be correct: > > Apparently not. > you are wrong, McGinn So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very own hand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 12:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8cc23335-0302-4ce4-bade-65583f738696@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #558004 |
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 12:15:03 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: > On 2/29/2016 12:57 PM, James McGinn wrote: > > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:36:47 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> On 2/29/16 12:13 PM, James McGinn wrote: > >>> The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths. > >> > >> In this case, all the physics has be tested and found to be correct: > > > > Apparently not. > > > > you are wrong, McGinn > > So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, > rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, > you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! > > Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are > crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very > own hand. So that everybody knows what all the excitement is about: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 21:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pqpeqc-ao6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #558043 |
Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 12:15:03 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: >> On 2/29/2016 12:57 PM, James McGinn wrote: >> > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:36:47 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> On 2/29/16 12:13 PM, James McGinn wrote: >> >>> The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths. >> >> >> >> In this case, all the physics has be tested and found to be correct: >> > >> > Apparently not. >> > >> >> you are wrong, McGinn >> >> So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, >> rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, >> you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! >> >> Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are >> crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very >> own hand. > > So that everybody knows what all the excitement is about: > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ You keep posting this bat shit crazy theory without the required experiment that would show that it is not bat shit crazy. The more you do that, the more convinced everyone is that you are in fact bat shit crazy. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 15:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3d686cfe-9c14-4f81-9a0f-0907e7f8ffd2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #558066 |
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 1:31:14 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 12:15:03 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: > >> On 2/29/2016 12:57 PM, James McGinn wrote: > >> > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:36:47 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> >> On 2/29/16 12:13 PM, James McGinn wrote: > >> >>> The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths. > >> >> > >> >> In this case, all the physics has be tested and found to be correct: > >> > > >> > Apparently not. > >> > > >> > >> you are wrong, McGinn > >> > >> So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, > >> rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, > >> you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! > >> > >> Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are > >> crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very > >> own hand. > > > > So that everybody knows what all the excitement is about: > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ > > You keep posting this bat shit crazy theory without the required experiment > that would show that it is not bat shit crazy. > > The more you do that, the more convinced everyone is that you are in fact > bat shit crazy. Somebody better do something to stop all of this, don't you think. I mean, look at this. IT'S SPREADING!!! Look at this: http://scottishsceptic.co.uk/2011/08/26/how-to-get-off-the-ground-with-nothing-but-water-almost/#comment-39168 and this: https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2016/02/26/weekend-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-114156
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-29 17:32 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <4uGdndB3xaGLSEnLnZ2dnUU7-IMAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #558085 |
On 2/29/16 5:00 PM, James McGinn wrote: > Somebody better do something to stop all of this, don't you think. Discuss the physics behind your arguments. sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 15:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7c604c35-cf6a-4660-8f49-c23dea9c6754@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #558091 |
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 3:32:41 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 2/29/16 5:00 PM, James McGinn wrote: > > Somebody better do something to stop all of this, don't you think. > > > Discuss the physics behind your arguments. Sam, you have no proof clear air is gaseous, do you? Answer the question, you evasive twit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 20:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nb86rn$q38$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #558721 |
On 3/2/2016 5:31 PM, James McGinn wrote: > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 3:32:41 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: >> On 2/29/16 5:00 PM, James McGinn wrote: >>> Somebody better do something to stop all of this, don't you think. >> >> >> Discuss the physics behind your arguments. > > Sam, you have no proof clear air is gaseous, do you? > Are you asking if air is a gas ? is that your question ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 00:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sn2fqc-cl7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #558085 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 1:31:14 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 12:15:03 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: >> >> On 2/29/2016 12:57 PM, James McGinn wrote: >> >> > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:36:47 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> >> On 2/29/16 12:13 PM, James McGinn wrote: >> >> >>> The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths. >> >> >> >> >> >> In this case, all the physics has be tested and found to be correct: >> >> > >> >> > Apparently not. >> >> > >> >> >> >> you are wrong, McGinn >> >> >> >> So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, >> >> rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, >> >> you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! >> >> >> >> Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are >> >> crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very >> >> own hand. >> > >> > So that everybody knows what all the excitement is about: >> > >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ >> >> You keep posting this bat shit crazy theory without the required experiment >> that would show that it is not bat shit crazy. >> >> The more you do that, the more convinced everyone is that you are in fact >> bat shit crazy. > > Somebody better do something to stop all of this, don't you think. I > mean, look at this. IT'S SPREADING!!! The only thing spreading is the knowledge that you are bat shit crazy. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 16:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9aeaf6e6-5368-4c70-bb84-3ac5bd43e2d6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #558066 |
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 1:31:14 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 12:15:03 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: > >> On 2/29/2016 12:57 PM, James McGinn wrote: > >> > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:36:47 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> >> On 2/29/16 12:13 PM, James McGinn wrote: > >> >>> The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths. > >> >> > >> >> In this case, all the physics has be tested and found to be correct: > >> > > >> > Apparently not. > >> > > >> > >> you are wrong, McGinn > >> > >> So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, > >> rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, > >> you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! > >> > >> Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are > >> crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very > >> own hand. > > > > So that everybody knows what all the excitement is about: > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ > > You keep posting this bat shit crazy theory without the required experiment > that would show that it is not bat shit crazy. > > The more you do that, the more convinced everyone is that you are in fact > bat shit crazy. Do you concede that there is no experimental evidence that clear air contains gaseous H2O? Address the issue, you evasive nitwit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 00:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9hekqc-ijp.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #558734 |
Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 1:31:14 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 12:15:03 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote: >> >> On 2/29/2016 12:57 PM, James McGinn wrote: >> >> > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:36:47 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> >> On 2/29/16 12:13 PM, James McGinn wrote: >> >> >>> The point is that often great scientific discoveries are concealed by group beliefs or myths. >> >> >> >> >> >> In this case, all the physics has be tested and found to be correct: >> >> > >> >> > Apparently not. >> >> > >> >> >> >> you are wrong, McGinn >> >> >> >> So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, >> >> rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, >> >> you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! >> >> >> >> Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are >> >> crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very >> >> own hand. >> > >> > So that everybody knows what all the excitement is about: >> > >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ >> >> You keep posting this bat shit crazy theory without the required experiment >> that would show that it is not bat shit crazy. >> >> The more you do that, the more convinced everyone is that you are in fact >> bat shit crazy. > > Do you concede that there is no experimental evidence that clear air > contains gaseous H2O? Of course not, as one would have to be bat shit crazy to believe that. > Address the issue, you evasive nitwit. The real issue is that you are bat shit crazy. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 11:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <24a9acb4-0acf-4801-80e4-85ad07554ed6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #558734 |
On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 1:31:14 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, > >> rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, > >> you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! > >> > >> Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are > >> crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very > >> own hand. > > > > So that everybody knows what all the excitement is about: > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ > > You keep posting this bat shit crazy theory without the required experiment > that would show that it is not bat shit crazy. > > The more you do that, the more convinced everyone is that you are in fact > bat shit crazy. Do you concede that there is no experimental evidence that clear air contains gaseous H2O?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 19:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <96orqc-7gk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559613 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 1:31:14 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> >> So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, >> >> rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, >> >> you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! >> >> >> >> Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are >> >> crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very >> >> own hand. >> > >> > So that everybody knows what all the excitement is about: >> > >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ >> >> You keep posting this bat shit crazy theory without the required experiment >> that would show that it is not bat shit crazy. >> >> The more you do that, the more convinced everyone is that you are in fact >> bat shit crazy. > > Do you concede that there is no experimental evidence that clear air > contains gaseous H2O? Of course not, that would be delusional and contrary to hundreds of years of physics. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 11:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <83bf5956-f495-4dcf-9b02-52545a4815ca@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559624 |
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:31:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 1:31:14 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > > >> >> So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, > >> >> rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, > >> >> you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! > >> >> > >> >> Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are > >> >> crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very > >> >> own hand. > >> > > >> > So that everybody knows what all the excitement is about: > >> > > >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ > >> > >> You keep posting this bat shit crazy theory without the required experiment > >> that would show that it is not bat shit crazy. > >> > >> The more you do that, the more convinced everyone is that you are in fact > >> bat shit crazy. > > > > Do you concede that there is no experimental evidence that clear air > > contains gaseous H2O? > > Of course not, that would be delusional and contrary to hundreds of > years of physics. Hundreds of years, . . . . and you can't find one reference. Hmm.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | edprochak@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 13:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c6d1bbef-f224-4a6c-9864-67390c4b9edb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559629 |
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 2:36:05 PM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote: > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:31:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: [] > > > > Of course not, that would be delusional and contrary to hundreds of > > years of physics. > > Hundreds of years, . . . . and you can't find one reference. Hmm. Hundreds of post by now and you still cannot provide the name of the school that granted your degree. Do you have even a Bachelor degree in physics? Did you even take physics in High school? You are a sad troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 13:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <bdfde3aa-014e-48e6-9ee6-97f3e8666343@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559652 |
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 1:06:51 PM UTC-8, edpr...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 2:36:05 PM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote: > > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:31:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > [] > > > > > > Of course not, that would be delusional and contrary to hundreds of > > > years of physics. > > > > Hundreds of years, . . . . and you can't find one reference. Hmm. > > Hundreds of post by now and you still cannot provide > the name of the school that granted your degree. > > Do you have even a Bachelor degree in physics? > Did you even take physics in High school? > You are a sad troll. Maybe you should find a gentler hobby. I've heard pressing leaves in books can be quite relaxing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 22:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <uu1sqc-gml.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #559629 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 11:31:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 1:31:14 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> > >> >> >> So, basically, this fellow, Dr. Richard Saykally, UC Berkely Professor, >> >> >> rips you a new a$$hole, and not only are you too stupid to realize it, >> >> >> you are then stupid enough to broadcast that fact here! >> >> >> >> >> >> Now everyone here knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you are >> >> >> crazier than an outhouse rat, and it was all accomplished by your very >> >> >> own hand. >> >> > >> >> > So that everybody knows what all the excitement is about: >> >> > >> >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/Cin1MQ4ZyFU/QmNEM9mnDgAJ >> >> >> >> You keep posting this bat shit crazy theory without the required experiment >> >> that would show that it is not bat shit crazy. >> >> >> >> The more you do that, the more convinced everyone is that you are in fact >> >> bat shit crazy. >> > >> > Do you concede that there is no experimental evidence that clear air >> > contains gaseous H2O? >> >> Of course not, that would be delusional and contrary to hundreds of >> years of physics. > > Hundreds of years, . . . . and you can't find one reference. Hmm. I, and grade school children can find them. Why can't you? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-05 14:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b3869732-fbb1-4874-ad59-c8a48a7dd8a3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #559661 |
On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 2:16:04 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > I, and grade school children can find them. Are you and the grade school children keeping it secret?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web