Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #605793 > unrolled thread

REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER

Started bybenj <benj@nobody.net>
First post2016-11-21 17:08 -0500
Last post2016-11-30 06:05 +0000
Articles 18 on this page of 138 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-21 17:08 -0500
    REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:33 -0800
      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 07:18 -0600
        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 05:47 -0800
          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:51 -0600
            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:56 -0500
              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 08:55 -0600
                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 07:39 -0800
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:05 -0600
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:07 -0800
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:11 -0600
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:15 -0800
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 12:31 -0600
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:52 -0500
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-23 18:23 +0000
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:49 -0500
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:46 -0600
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 20:09 -0500
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 07:35 -0600
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 17:11 -0500
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 16:15 -0600
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 19:37 -0500
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 09:04 -0600
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:50 -0800
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-30 17:55 -0500
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:53 -0800
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-30 17:56 -0500
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 08:11 -0800
                                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:33 -0500
                                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 03:59 -0800
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 10:49 -0800
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 11:50 -0800
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 18:18 -0500
                                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 23:54 +0000
                                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 19:07 -0500
                                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-03 01:10 +0000
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 18:14 -0500
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-02 23:27 +0000
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-02 19:11 -0500
                                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-03 01:12 +0000
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-03 05:19 -0800
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-03 18:13 -0500
                                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-04 09:48 -0800
          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:40 -0500
      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 17:50 +0000
    REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 15:12 -0800
      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-21 19:14 -0500
        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 18:50 -0800
          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:31 -0500
            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-22 23:06 +0000
              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 20:29 -0500
                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 01:50 +0000
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:22 -0500
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:03 +0000
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:39 -0500
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:03 +0000
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:53 -0500
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:07 +0000
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:29 -0500
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:41 +0000
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:38 -0500
                                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:40 +0000
                                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:16 -0500
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:34 +0000
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:43 -0500
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:58 +0000
            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 17:12 -0800
              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 20:27 -0500
                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 01:52 +0000
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:25 -0500
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:06 +0000
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:42 -0500
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:06 +0000
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:55 -0500
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:09 +0000
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:30 -0500
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:42 +0000
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:40 -0500
                                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:43 +0000
                                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:18 -0500
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:35 +0000
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:43 -0500
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:59 +0000
                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 04:35 -0800
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-23 18:20 +0000
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:59 -0500
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:09 +0000
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:44 -0500
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:16 +0000
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:58 -0500
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:14 +0000
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:32 -0500
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:52 +0000
                                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:41 -0500
                                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:45 +0000
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:26 -0500
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:43 +0000
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:45 -0500
                                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:02 +0000
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:41 -0500
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:10 +0000
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:46 -0500
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:17 +0000
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 21:59 -0500
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:15 +0000
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:33 -0500
                                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:54 +0000
                                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:43 -0500
                                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:46 +0000
                                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:31 -0500
                                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:44 +0000
                                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:46 -0500
                                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:04 +0000
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 07:59 -0800
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:13 -0800
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:20 -0800
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 09:46 -0800
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 08:57 -0800
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 10:38 -0800
                              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 17:16 -0500
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:47 -0500
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:43 -0500
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:37 -0500
              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 18:31 -0800
                premote fiewing **** noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 19:59 -0800
    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:12 +0000
      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:47 -0500
        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:19 +0000
          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:05 -0500
            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:17 +0000
              Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:34 -0500
                Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:55 +0000
                  Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:44 -0500
                    Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:49 +0000
                      Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:32 -0500
                        Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:49 +0000
                          Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:46 -0500
                            Re: REMOTE VIEWER CALLS HVAC A LOSER jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:05 +0000

Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]


#606909

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-28 16:47 -0500
Message-ID<583ca600$0$34540$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#606696
On 11/27/2016 12:46 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> On Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 11:20:40 AM UTC-5, HVAC wrote:
>> Maple loops
>>> Now back to your regularly scheduled Fake Commercials. Go Buy buy BUY!
>>>
>>> Even better than the real thing -- U2.
>> ----------
>>
>> U2 sucks dead dog dick. You too
>
> That's needlessly too graphic, mostly ugly. Does it warm your cockles, HVAC?
>
> U2 is a ray of hope in an otherwise wasted generation lost to deep music.
> Bon Jovi, O wait... Bono is it... O crap... what was my point here?!
>
> She moves in mysterious ways, in a cold November rain -- U2+youKnow.

Why should love be limited by what sex you are, what age you are, or 
what species you are. Hardblow having won same-sex marriage now want to 
marry animals.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#606905

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-28 16:43 -0500
Message-ID<583ca4fd$0$34540$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#606689
On 11/27/2016 11:20 AM, HVAC wrote:
> Maple loops
> Now back to your regularly scheduled Fake Commercials. Go Buy buy BUY!
>
> Even better than the real thing -- U2.
> ----------
>
> U2 sucks dead dog dick. You too
>
Ignore Hardblow, Looperji. He's just bent out of shape over their huge 
UFO concert stage. It make it harder for him to pretend UFO don't exist 
(along with ghosts, ESP, Remote viewing, Government lies and so on)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#606901

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-28 16:37 -0500
Message-ID<583ca3a9$0$51784$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#606685
On 11/27/2016 10:59 AM, HVAC wrote:
> BJ quacked
>> There has never been a successful test of remote viewing. Period.
>>
>> It's as simple as that. Trust me.
>
> The scientists running the project disagree with you. And even more fun
> is the fact that many of the "best" results are still classified. Of
> course you are privy to all of those due to your "need to know".
> ----------
>
> If the 'best' results are classified, how do you know about them? Your logic kung fu is weak.
>
> And why on earth would *I* have a need to know? I don't even currently work for any known government agency or organization
>
Your admission of ignorance is acknowledged and accepted.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#606054

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-22 18:31 -0800
Message-ID<25ca1036-931f-4430-8644-648771152fb4@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#606041
c)
  lown shoes, size thirty-one tenths, or thirty-two hundredths

> Which do you believe in more... Ghosts or remote viewing?
> 
> Legit question? Right right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#606638 — premote fiewing ****

FromnoTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-26 19:59 -0800
Subjectpremote fiewing ****
Message-ID<3b9d989c-c987-4221-bf6a-efccfad4a657@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#606054
my only knowledge of it is from the sorryass Art belL show,
which is always full with ridiculous flimflammery,
like majoR EddameS

> c)
>   lown shoes, size thirty-one tenths, or thirty-two hundredths
> 
> > Which do you believe in more... Ghosts or remote viewing or
unidentified floating objet de wha'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#606303

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-11-24 01:12 +0000
Message-ID<qcrhgd-mik.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#605793
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever 
> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the 
> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program 
> said the following about clowns like HVAC:

Nope, he said they got null results, kook.

<snip kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#606597

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-26 19:47 -0500
Message-ID<583a2d1a$0$12009$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#606303
On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>
> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>
> <snip kook babble>
>
>
Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for 
bingo later.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#606621

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-11-27 02:19 +0000
Message-ID<9fspgd-8gh.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#606597
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>>
>> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>>
>> <snip kook babble>
>>
>>
> Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for 
> bingo later.

Then where are the postive results kook?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#606629

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-26 22:05 -0500
Message-ID<583a4d84$0$10192$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#606621
On 11/26/2016 9:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>>>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>>>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>>>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>>>
>>> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>>>
>>> <snip kook babble>
>>>
>>>
>> Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for
>> bingo later.
>
> Then where are the postive results kook?

This is your level of scholarship. I Quote the author and Experiment 
principle who said point blank that positive results are beyond doubt 
and that idiots like you and HVAC just keep coming up with ways to deny 
in your face results. This is the very definition of insanity. And you 
are so senile you can't even recall my original post with the quote. 
You'll say the quote does not exist. I could go to the archive and rub 
your nose in the stink and you'll still say all you smell is roses. 
That's how big a liar you are!

FROTH! WE HAVE FROTH! BENJ IS ALL WORKED UP AND MAD!  YOU AND HVAC WIN 
AGAIN! YOU ARE GENIUSES AND EVERYONE ELSE IS INSANE!  YEAH THAT'S IT!


Bwahahahahahahahahha!  You guys are So ignorant who do you get to tie 
your clown shoes for you!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#606652

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-11-27 04:17 +0000
Message-ID<sb3qgd-j5i.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#606629
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 11/26/2016 9:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>>>>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>>>>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>>>>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>>>>
>>>> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>>>>
>>>> <snip kook babble>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for
>>> bingo later.
>>
>> Then where are the postive results kook?
> 
> This is your level of scholarship. I Quote the author and Experiment 
> principle who said 

Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?

<snip remaining kook froth>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#606899

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-28 16:34 -0500
Message-ID<583ca30c$0$51784$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#606652
On 11/26/2016 11:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 11/26/2016 9:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>>>>>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>>>>>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>>>>>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip kook babble>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for
>>>> bingo later.
>>>
>>> Then where are the postive results kook?
>>
>> This is your level of scholarship. I Quote the author and Experiment
>> principle who said
>
> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>
> <snip remaining kook froth>

Go look them up yourself. Don't you trust your government to do proper 
science?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#606982

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-11-29 01:55 +0000
Message-ID<fq3vgd-o95.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#606899
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 11/26/2016 11:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2016 9:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>>>>>>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>>>>>>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>>>>>>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip kook babble>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for
>>>>> bingo later.
>>>>
>>>> Then where are the postive results kook?
>>>
>>> This is your level of scholarship. I Quote the author and Experiment
>>> principle who said
>>
>> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>>
>> <snip remaining kook froth>
> 
> Go look them up yourself. Don't you trust your government to do proper 
> science?

You are the one making the claim that such results exist kook.

What does the government have to do with it kook?

Did you know there is more than one government on the planet kook? 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#607091

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-29 17:44 -0500
Message-ID<583e04dc$0$55876$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#606982
On 11/28/2016 8:55 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 11/26/2016 11:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>>>>>>>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>>>>>>>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>>>>>>>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip kook babble>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for
>>>>>> bingo later.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then where are the postive results kook?
>>>>
>>>> This is your level of scholarship. I Quote the author and Experiment
>>>> principle who said
>>>
>>> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>>>
>>> <snip remaining kook froth>
>>
>> Go look them up yourself. Don't you trust your government to do proper
>> science?
>
> You are the one making the claim that such results exist kook.
>
> What does the government have to do with it kook?
>
> Did you know there is more than one government on the planet kook?
>
So ask the attendants at your assisted living home what country you are 
living in. I don't think Kalifornia is in Japan. Idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#607128

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-11-29 23:49 +0000
Message-ID<6pg1hd-ile.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#607091
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 11/28/2016 8:55 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2016 11:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>>>>>>>>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>>>>>>>>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>>>>>>>>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip kook babble>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for
>>>>>>> bingo later.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then where are the postive results kook?
>>>>>
>>>>> This is your level of scholarship. I Quote the author and Experiment
>>>>> principle who said
>>>>
>>>> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>>>>
>>>> <snip remaining kook froth>
>>>
>>> Go look them up yourself. Don't you trust your government to do proper
>>> science?
>>
>> You are the one making the claim that such results exist kook.
>>
>> What does the government have to do with it kook?
>>
>> Did you know there is more than one government on the planet kook?
>>
> So ask the attendants at your assisted living home what country you are 
> living in. I don't think Kalifornia is in Japan. Idiot.

Again I ask does the government have to do with it kook?

Can you stay on subject kook?

Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?

Where are the universities studying this phenomena kook?

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#607144

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-29 19:32 -0500
Message-ID<583e1e3f$0$51680$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#607128
On 11/29/2016 6:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 11/28/2016 8:55 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>>>>>>>>>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>>>>>>>>>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>>>>>>>>>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <snip kook babble>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for
>>>>>>>> bingo later.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then where are the postive results kook?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is your level of scholarship. I Quote the author and Experiment
>>>>>> principle who said
>>>>>
>>>>> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip remaining kook froth>
>>>>
>>>> Go look them up yourself. Don't you trust your government to do proper
>>>> science?
>>>
>>> You are the one making the claim that such results exist kook.
>>>
>>> What does the government have to do with it kook?
>>>
>>> Did you know there is more than one government on the planet kook?
>>>
>> So ask the attendants at your assisted living home what country you are
>> living in. I don't think Kalifornia is in Japan. Idiot.
>
> Again I ask does the government have to do with it kook?
>
> Can you stay on subject kook?
>
> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>
> Where are the universities studying this phenomena kook?
>
Never heard of Duke? Check Russian literature and universities. What 
does "S" stand for in SRI YOu are a moron. A total waste of drooling time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#607164

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-11-30 01:49 +0000
Message-ID<gpn1hd-s9f.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#607144
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 6:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/28/2016 8:55 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>>>>>>>>>>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>>>>>>>>>>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>>>>>>>>>>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <snip kook babble>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for
>>>>>>>>> bingo later.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then where are the postive results kook?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is your level of scholarship. I Quote the author and Experiment
>>>>>>> principle who said
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip remaining kook froth>
>>>>>
>>>>> Go look them up yourself. Don't you trust your government to do proper
>>>>> science?
>>>>
>>>> You are the one making the claim that such results exist kook.
>>>>
>>>> What does the government have to do with it kook?
>>>>
>>>> Did you know there is more than one government on the planet kook?
>>>>
>>> So ask the attendants at your assisted living home what country you are
>>> living in. I don't think Kalifornia is in Japan. Idiot.
>>
>> Again I ask does the government have to do with it kook?
>>
>> Can you stay on subject kook?
>>
>> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>>
>> Where are the universities studying this phenomena kook?
>>
> Never heard of Duke? Check Russian literature and universities. What 
> does "S" stand for in SRI YOu are a moron. A total waste of drooling time.

Yeah, sure, just like the US Army study that concluded it was all kook
nonsense.

Where are the peer reviewed published POSITIVE results kook?

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#607189

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2016-11-29 21:46 -0500
Message-ID<583e3d9c$0$10193$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#607164
On 11/29/2016 8:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> On 11/29/2016 6:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 11/28/2016 8:55 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>>>>>>>>>>>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>>>>>>>>>>>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip kook babble>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for
>>>>>>>>>> bingo later.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then where are the postive results kook?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is your level of scholarship. I Quote the author and Experiment
>>>>>>>> principle who said
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip remaining kook froth>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Go look them up yourself. Don't you trust your government to do proper
>>>>>> science?
>>>>>
>>>>> You are the one making the claim that such results exist kook.
>>>>>
>>>>> What does the government have to do with it kook?
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you know there is more than one government on the planet kook?
>>>>>
>>>> So ask the attendants at your assisted living home what country you are
>>>> living in. I don't think Kalifornia is in Japan. Idiot.
>>>
>>> Again I ask does the government have to do with it kook?
>>>
>>> Can you stay on subject kook?
>>>
>>> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>>>
>>> Where are the universities studying this phenomena kook?
>>>
>> Never heard of Duke? Check Russian literature and universities. What
>> does "S" stand for in SRI YOu are a moron. A total waste of drooling time.
>
> Yeah, sure, just like the US Army study that concluded it was all kook
> nonsense.
>
> Where are the peer reviewed published POSITIVE results kook?
>
Yeah, sure they did. Wink wink.
STalker

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#607212

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-11-30 06:05 +0000
Message-ID<4q62hd-9sg.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#607189
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 8:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/29/2016 6:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/28/2016 8:55 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> HVAC, the idiot journalist denies that remote viewing experiments ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>> took place. He lies about everything. But Joe McMoneagle, one of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> members of the Army/Defense Intelligece agency Remote viewing program
>>>>>>>>>>>>> said the following about clowns like HVAC:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, he said they got null results, kook.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip kook babble>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Senile drool. Pay attention to what is going on. You can go down for
>>>>>>>>>>> bingo later.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then where are the postive results kook?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is your level of scholarship. I Quote the author and Experiment
>>>>>>>>> principle who said
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip remaining kook froth>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Go look them up yourself. Don't you trust your government to do proper
>>>>>>> science?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are the one making the claim that such results exist kook.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does the government have to do with it kook?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you know there is more than one government on the planet kook?
>>>>>>
>>>>> So ask the attendants at your assisted living home what country you are
>>>>> living in. I don't think Kalifornia is in Japan. Idiot.
>>>>
>>>> Again I ask does the government have to do with it kook?
>>>>
>>>> Can you stay on subject kook?
>>>>
>>>> Where are the peer reviewed published results kook?
>>>>
>>>> Where are the universities studying this phenomena kook?
>>>>
>>> Never heard of Duke? Check Russian literature and universities. What
>>> does "S" stand for in SRI YOu are a moron. A total waste of drooling time.
>>
>> Yeah, sure, just like the US Army study that concluded it was all kook
>> nonsense.
>>
>> Where are the peer reviewed published POSITIVE results kook?
>>
> Yeah, sure they did. Wink wink.
> STalker

Who is "they" kook?

Sure they did what kook?

Where are the peer reviewed published POSITIVE results kook?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web