Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #547834 > unrolled thread

This year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in Oklahoma

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2016-01-24 16:41 -0600
Last post2016-01-24 16:24 -0800
Articles 7 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  This year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in Oklahoma Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 16:41 -0600
    Re: This year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in Oklahoma jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-24 23:12 +0000
      Re: This year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in Oklahoma Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 17:48 -0600
        Re: This year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in Oklahoma jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-25 00:53 +0000
          Re: This year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in Oklahoma Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 19:15 -0600
            Re: This year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in Oklahoma jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-25 02:32 +0000
      Re: This yearb "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-01-24 16:24 -0800

#547834 — This year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in Oklahoma

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-24 16:41 -0600
SubjectThis year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in Oklahoma
Message-ID<luednT5ndtm8zjjLnZ2dnUU7-SEAAAAA@giganews.com>
This year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in Oklahoma
> http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/01/this-years-first-batch-of-anti-science-education-bills-surface-in-oklahoma/


> The first state bills of the year that would interfere with science
> education have appeared in Oklahoma. There, both the House and Senate
> have seen bills that would prevent school officials and
> administrators from disciplining any teachers who introduce spurious
> information to science classes.
>
> These bills have a long history, dating back to around the time when
> teaching intelligent design was determined to be an unconstitutional
> imposition of religion. A recent study showed that you could take the
> text of the bills and build an evolutionary tree that traces their
> modifications over the last decade. The latest two fit the patterns
> nicely.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#547840

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-01-24 23:12 +0000
Message-ID<bb2gnc-rsi.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#547834
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> This year?s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in Oklahoma
>> http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/01/this-years-first-batch-of-anti-science-education-bills-surface-in-oklahoma/
> 
> 
>> The first state bills of the year that would interfere with science
>> education have appeared in Oklahoma. There, both the House and Senate
>> have seen bills that would prevent school officials and
>> administrators from disciplining any teachers who introduce spurious
>> information to science classes.
>>
>> These bills have a long history, dating back to around the time when
>> teaching intelligent design was determined to be an unconstitutional
>> imposition of religion. A recent study showed that you could take the
>> text of the bills and build an evolutionary tree that traces their
>> modifications over the last decade. The latest two fit the patterns
>> nicely.
 
From  http://arstechnica.com

"The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed,
transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written
permission of CondC) Nast." 

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547844

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-24 17:48 -0600
Message-ID<8OSdnUAIBut6_zjLnZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#547840
On 1/24/16 5:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
> "The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed,
> transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written
> permission of CondC) Nast."
>

   Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your
   absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger
   Management classes. You, jimp, need these services:
 > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes

   This year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in
   Oklahoma
> http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/01/this-years-first-batch-of-anti-science-education-bills-surface-in-oklahoma/

 > The first state bills of the year that would interfere with science
 > education have appeared in Oklahoma. There, both the House and Senate
 > have seen bills that would prevent school officials and
 > administrators from disciplining any teachers who introduce spurious
 > information to science classes.
 >
 > These bills have a long history, dating back to around the time when
 > teaching intelligent design was determined to be an unconstitutional
 > imposition of religion. A recent study showed that you could take the
 > text of the bills and build an evolutionary tree that traces their
 > modifications over the last decade. The latest two fit the patterns
 > nicely.

   It would be nice if the jimp commented on the content of the linked
   article, instead of behaving like Pavlov's dog.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547856

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-01-25 00:53 +0000
Message-ID<698gnc-5fj.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#547844
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/24/16 5:12 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>> "The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed,
>> transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written
>> permission of CondC) Nast."
>>
> 
>   Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your

What part of the following do you not understand?

"The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed,
transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written
permission of CondC) Nast."

Did you get prior written permission to reproduce their content?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547857

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-01-24 19:15 -0600
Message-ID<0Kydnc4fLNLf6jjLnZ2dnUU7-VudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#547856
On 1/24/16 6:53 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Did you get prior written permission to reproduce their content?


   Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your
   absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger
   Management classes. You, jimp, need these services:
 > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes

   This year’s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in
   Oklahoma
> http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/01/this-years-first-batch-of-anti-science-education-bills-surface-in-oklahoma/

 > The first state bills of the year that would interfere with science
 > education have appeared in Oklahoma. There, both the House and Senate
 > have seen bills that would prevent school officials and
 > administrators from disciplining any teachers who introduce spurious
 > information to science classes.
 >
 > These bills have a long history, dating back to around the time when
 > teaching intelligent design was determined to be an unconstitutional
 > imposition of religion. A recent study showed that you could take the
 > text of the bills and build an evolutionary tree that traces their
 > modifications over the last decade. The latest two fit the patterns
 > nicely.

   It would be nice if the jimp commented on the content of the linked
   article, instead of behaving like Pavlov's dog.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547860

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-01-25 02:32 +0000
Message-ID<s2egnc-a0k.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#547857
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/24/16 6:53 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Did you get prior written permission to reproduce their content?
> 
> 
>   Now, now, jimp, you're obsessive nature is outta control, and your

What part of the following do you not understand?

"The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed,
transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written
permission of CondC) Nast."

Did you get prior written permission to reproduce their content or is
it that you feel yourself so special you are exempt from the rules of
society?

sociopath:

A person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme
antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#547849 — Re: This yearb

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2016-01-24 16:24 -0800
SubjectRe: This yearb
Message-ID<n83pr0$b0k$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#547840
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote:
>
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This year?s first batch of anti-science education bills surface in 
>> Oklahoma
>>> http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/01/this-years-first-batch-of-anti-science-education-bills-surface-in-oklahoma/
>>
>>> The first state bills of the year that would interfere with science
>>> education have appeared in Oklahoma. There, both the House and Senate
>>> have seen bills that would prevent school officials and
>>> administrators from disciplining any teachers who introduce spurious
>>> information to science classes.
>>>
>>> These bills have a long history, dating back to around the time when
>>> teaching intelligent design was determined to be an unconstitutional
>>> imposition of religion. A recent study showed that you could take the
>>> text of the bills and build an evolutionary tree that traces their
>>> modifications over the last decade. The latest two fit the patterns
>>> nicely.
>
Jim Pennino wrote:
> From  http://arstechnica.com
> "The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed,
> transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written
> permission of CondC) Nast."
> Jim Pennino
>
hanson wrote:
Pennino, you are whistling Dixie with using that argument
against kike Wormley. It won't work, given the folks in ARS, like
Ken Fisher.Eric Bangerman, David Kravets, Aron Zimmerman, Shmuel
Machkovech,  Johnathan Gitlin, Eric Berger, A. Newitz, K. Niemeyer,
Ilitch Bejinunm, who are the kind about whom the eminent
>
Jewish scholar Harold Wallace Rosenthal said in his epic ||R:||
<http://tinyurl.com/The-HW-Rosenthal-interview-XT>
>
||R:|| We Jews have a solidarity & a closeness to
||R:|| fellow Jews like none other in the world.
||R:|| We Jews are always 'as one' when it counts.
>
In that ||R:|| link is much, much more to see why kikes behave
the way they do. "Get the picture" .... ahahahaha...
Pennino, carry on with your good work.
And thanks for the laughs.... ahahahaha.... ahahahahanson

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web