Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517776 > unrolled thread
| Started by | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-29 22:25 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-04 17:00 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 300 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Rocky, the lying Squirrel has been lying this same schick since at least Dec 2013 gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:25 -0500
Re: Rocky, the lying Squirrel has been lying this same schick since at least Dec 2013 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 20:40 -0700
9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 00:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 23:09 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Pom Trotter" <none@nunmail.com> - 2015-08-30 11:02 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 22:39 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:47 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 10:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 18:13 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 07:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:27 +0200
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Kent is given the no planes video) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Kent is given the no planes video) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 04:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 19:37 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-31 08:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 07:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (kent tries to sidetrack) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (kent tries to sidetrack) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-31 22:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 20:01 -0700
job of de planes were/n't bombs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 12:33 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 04:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 13:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:14 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 18:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 23:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-31 08:06 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 07:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 10:24 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 09:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-31 11:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-31 10:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-01 11:24 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 13:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-01 16:05 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 06:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 09:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 06:42 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Drew Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-02 07:53 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:47 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 11:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-02 15:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 17:37 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 07:14 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 17:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 04:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 07:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-03 13:49 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-31 14:42 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-01 11:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-01 23:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 10:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-02 16:00 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:07 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 10:14 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 07:24 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-03 13:54 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 14:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 11:25 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 05:29 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 06:29 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 09:49 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 07:17 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 10:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 07:59 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 12:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 10:11 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Jack Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-04 15:54 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 12:28 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-08 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 09:47 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 10:00 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-08 12:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:49 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 07:36 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 09:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-05 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rick Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-03 16:53 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-03 19:11 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 07:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 10:15 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 10:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 12:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 07:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-07 11:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:36 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 16:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:36 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 04:07 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 10:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-07 11:08 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 10:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-01 12:06 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-01 23:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-03 21:47 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 07:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 04:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-04 22:12 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-04 15:21 +0200
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 09:51 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-04 17:55 +0200
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-05 09:15 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-05 07:36 +0200
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-06 04:59 +0200
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 07:40 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-06 08:41 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 22:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 10:12 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 07:11 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 08:42 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 10:51 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 10:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-08 11:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-08 11:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (HVAC missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:47 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:14 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (K missed the fact the OBL tapes were bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Roger's mental defect(s) make honesty very difficult for him. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 14:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 15:26 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-09 07:27 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 11:49 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-09 13:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 06:00 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-07 18:24 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 10:47 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-06 08:50 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 06:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:11 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-04 11:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-05 09:17 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-05 09:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-06 08:58 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-05 23:05 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-07 18:27 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 05:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:14 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 10:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 09:43 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:33 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:05 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 22:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 22:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 13:45 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-08 12:40 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (K is full of it) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 07:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Roger is once again reduced to lying, as I prove) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (FK is faced with more ?s) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 18:00 -0500
Re: Rocky still insane jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 23:27 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Roger FEARS offering honest answers to questions) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Kid is lying sack of shit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 09:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Kid is lying sack of shit) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 13:40 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 13:47 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 16:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar 2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 16:18 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar 2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 20:06 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (directed to Sar) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (Roger has to post edit to avoid the truth. Again) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-30 10:08 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 10:43 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:33 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 10:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 13:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 12:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 13:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-30 12:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:49 +0200
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 17:22 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 18:01 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:17 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 00:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:05 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:40 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:47 +0200
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-04 01:57 +0200
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-30 14:08 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-31 14:40 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-01 11:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-01 23:42 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-02 11:26 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-02 15:50 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-03 05:15 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-03 10:59 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 10:28 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 07:38 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 22:45 -0700
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-05 09:21 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-06 09:05 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 06:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-07 18:30 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:14 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 07:46 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-06 09:07 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-07 18:31 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 05:42 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 07:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 15:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 15:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 15:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:22 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:55 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:16 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. ?s for hvac "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. ?s for hvac HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 10:20 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. proof hvac is crazy "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. proof hvac is crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:41 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. proof jimp is a cartoon freak "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 12:56 -0500
Re: Rocky still batshit crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:11 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. proof jimp is a cartoon freak "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:32 -0500
Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:35 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. ?s for hvac "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:14 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. K caught in a big lie "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Roger has to post edit to avoid the truth. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 14:57 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. ?s for hvac jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:40 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-05 10:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-06 09:24 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-05 23:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-07 18:34 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 07:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-08 12:24 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 22:45 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 22:44 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 10:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. BKD admits why he was so easily fooled "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 09:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 05:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 08:50 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy as a loon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:45 +0000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-09-07 18:35 +1000
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 05:50 -0400
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-08 09:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 03:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 07:26 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 06:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 was an inside job. Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-05 17:33 -0700
gilber34 shows us a very good link "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:25 -0500
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-30 23:58 +0200
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:59 -0500
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:26 +0200
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-31 06:49 +0200
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:37 +0200
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-31 20:41 +0200
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:32 -0500
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-01 06:36 +0200
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 15:41 -0500
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-02 23:51 +0200
Re: gilber34 shows us a very good link "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 17:10 -0500
de planes were ****s noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 17:00 -0700
Page 11 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 15 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 10:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. |
| Message-ID | <bsmdnYSCgMGSu37InZ2dnUU7-IWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517861 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mrv4o1$dhv$1@dont-email.me... > > > BDK wrote: >> In article <mru01d$oil$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >>> >>> gilber34 wrote: >>>> Rocky, the lying Squirrel has been ko0k-ing this same old schick since >>>> at least Dec 2013. >>>> >>>> Nothing new, old fart re-farting same fart, over and over, stuck in a >>>> DO loop. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/2014-01/0000.html >>>> >>>> >>>> this index goes back to 2003 ! >>>> >>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/ >>> >>> >>> It just proves how 9/11 being an inside job,.....just won't go away. >>> No matter how many people spend billions to keep trying to make it >>> disappear >> >> It won't go away because Troofery is a terminal diesase with no known >> cure. > > > Spoken like a true flat earther. > I'm sure your ancestors were just as pissed off at Copernicus and Galileo, > with their unending "kookdom" about the earth being a ball. > > Awww, maybe you will feel better if you spend the day trying to find a few > witches to burn. > > Or you can watch this video. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k HOLY SHIT that video also has the ground shaking event 12 seconds before the North Tower was vaporized. The event that the USGS managed to deny existed with their falsified seismic readings. Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the explosion that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was caught on camera and at the exact same time as that explosion an AM receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City recorded an EMP. I like the following video too but ask that the part about holograms be skipped over because the numerous people that didn't see any jets are proof that no holograms were used. Retired Expert Pilot John Lear - No Planes Hit the Towers on 9/11 (time indexed to start after an unnecessary discussion about holograms) https://youtu.be/YQBlv7sZGVE?t=1m45s Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 13:07 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. |
| Message-ID | <mrvd4t$hn8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517884 |
Rocky wrote: > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > news:mrv4o1$dhv$1@dont-email.me... >> >> >> BDK wrote: >>> In article <mru01d$oil$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid >>> says... >>>> >>>> gilber34 wrote: >>>>> Rocky, the lying Squirrel has been ko0k-ing this same old schick >>>>> since at least Dec 2013. >>>>> >>>>> Nothing new, old fart re-farting same fart, over and over, stuck in >>>>> a DO loop. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/2014-01/0000.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> this index goes back to 2003 ! >>>>> >>>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/ >>>> >>>> >>>> It just proves how 9/11 being an inside job,.....just won't go away. >>>> No matter how many people spend billions to keep trying to make it >>>> disappear >>> >>> It won't go away because Troofery is a terminal diesase with no known >>> cure. >> >> >> Spoken like a true flat earther. >> I'm sure your ancestors were just as pissed off at Copernicus and >> Galileo, with their unending "kookdom" about the earth being a ball. >> >> Awww, maybe you will feel better if you spend the day trying to find a >> few witches to burn. >> >> Or you can watch this video. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k > > HOLY SHIT that video also has the ground shaking event 12 seconds > before the North Tower was vaporized. The event that the USGS managed > to deny existed with their falsified seismic readings. > > Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the > explosion that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was > caught on camera and at the exact same time as that explosion an AM > receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City recorded an EMP. > > I like the following video too but ask that the part about holograms be > skipped over because the numerous people that didn't see any jets are > proof that no holograms were used. > > Retired Expert Pilot John Lear - No Planes Hit the Towers on 9/11 > (time indexed to start after an unnecessary discussion about holograms) > https://youtu.be/YQBlv7sZGVE?t=1m45s > > Rocky There is more proof to support the 9/11 truth movement. With actual videos. here is another one. Dr. Morgan Reynolds - The Fake Planes of 9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4d2Mt2a6iM All the official 9/11 fairytalers have is a book to refer to. And the "political science of politicians and beurocracts. ...Who probably could never make a living if they had to work in the real world, and not rely on grants/bursaries being handed to them It parallels the blind theological idiocy of the Crusades, and the Creationists.....even the Church of Scientology. It's just surprising that the 9/11 report didn't blame Satan, and Lord Zenu.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 12:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. |
| Message-ID | <ZLednbpLUp1qp37InZ2dnUU7-K-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517902 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mrvd4t$hn8$1@dont-email.me... > > > Rocky wrote: >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >> news:mrv4o1$dhv$1@dont-email.me... >>> >>> >>> BDK wrote: >>>> In article <mru01d$oil$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> gilber34 wrote: >>>>>> Rocky, the lying Squirrel has been ko0k-ing this same old schick >>>>>> since at least Dec 2013. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nothing new, old fart re-farting same fart, over and over, stuck in >>>>>> a DO loop. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/2014-01/0000.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> this index goes back to 2003 ! >>>>>> >>>>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It just proves how 9/11 being an inside job,.....just won't go away. >>>>> No matter how many people spend billions to keep trying to make it >>>>> disappear >>>> >>>> It won't go away because Troofery is a terminal diesase with no known >>>> cure. >>> >>> >>> Spoken like a true flat earther. >>> I'm sure your ancestors were just as pissed off at Copernicus and >>> Galileo, with their unending "kookdom" about the earth being a ball. >>> >>> Awww, maybe you will feel better if you spend the day trying to find a >>> few witches to burn. >>> >>> Or you can watch this video. >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k >> >> HOLY SHIT that video also has the ground shaking event 12 seconds >> before the North Tower was vaporized. The event that the USGS managed >> to deny existed with their falsified seismic readings. >> >> Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the >> explosion that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was >> caught on camera and at the exact same time as that explosion an AM >> receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City recorded an EMP. >> >> I like the following video too but ask that the part about holograms be >> skipped over because the numerous people that didn't see any jets are >> proof that no holograms were used. >> >> Retired Expert Pilot John Lear - No Planes Hit the Towers on 9/11 >> (time indexed to start after an unnecessary discussion about holograms) >> https://youtu.be/YQBlv7sZGVE?t=1m45s >> >> Rocky > > > > There is more proof to support the 9/11 truth movement. > With actual videos. > > here is another one. > Dr. Morgan Reynolds - The Fake Planes of 9/11 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4d2Mt2a6iM > > > > > All the official 9/11 fairytalers have is a book to refer to. And the > "political science of politicians and beurocracts. > ...Who probably could never make a living if they had to work in the real > world, and not rely on grants/bursaries being handed to them > > It parallels the blind theological idiocy of the Crusades, and the > Creationists.....even the Church of Scientology. > It's just surprising that the 9/11 report didn't blame Satan, and Lord > Zenu. Oh Gaud I love that video and many thanks for your post and great links. BTW I like the fact that you go one step further than AE911truth because AE911truth doesn't like to address the obvious lies about any of the jets. As for me what finally convinced me that CGIs were used in Nuke York City was when I saw what was really wrong with the Evan Fairbanks video, what setup they would need to fabricate hundreds of videos and then what they used to synchronize the real world with the bogus CGIs. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 13:57 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. |
| Message-ID | <mrvg31$uhf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #517904 |
Rocky wrote: > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > news:mrvd4t$hn8$1@dont-email.me... >> >> >> Rocky wrote: >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:mrv4o1$dhv$1@dont-email.me... >>>> >>>> >>>> BDK wrote: >>>>> In article <mru01d$oil$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> gilber34 wrote: >>>>>>> Rocky, the lying Squirrel has been ko0k-ing this same old schick >>>>>>> since at least Dec 2013. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nothing new, old fart re-farting same fart, over and over, stuck >>>>>>> in a DO loop. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/2014-01/0000.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> this index goes back to 2003 ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It just proves how 9/11 being an inside job,.....just won't go >>>>>> away. No matter how many people spend billions to keep trying to >>>>>> make it disappear >>>>> >>>>> It won't go away because Troofery is a terminal diesase with no >>>>> known cure. >>>> >>>> >>>> Spoken like a true flat earther. >>>> I'm sure your ancestors were just as pissed off at Copernicus and >>>> Galileo, with their unending "kookdom" about the earth being a ball. >>>> >>>> Awww, maybe you will feel better if you spend the day trying to find >>>> a few witches to burn. >>>> >>>> Or you can watch this video. >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k >>> >>> HOLY SHIT that video also has the ground shaking event 12 seconds >>> before the North Tower was vaporized. The event that the USGS managed >>> to deny existed with their falsified seismic readings. >>> >>> Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the >>> explosion that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was >>> caught on camera and at the exact same time as that explosion an AM >>> receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City recorded an EMP. >>> >>> I like the following video too but ask that the part about holograms >>> be skipped over because the numerous people that didn't see any jets >>> are proof that no holograms were used. >>> >>> Retired Expert Pilot John Lear - No Planes Hit the Towers on 9/11 >>> (time indexed to start after an unnecessary discussion about >>> holograms) https://youtu.be/YQBlv7sZGVE?t=1m45s >>> >>> Rocky >> >> >> >> There is more proof to support the 9/11 truth movement. >> With actual videos. >> >> here is another one. >> Dr. Morgan Reynolds - The Fake Planes of 9/11 >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4d2Mt2a6iM >> >> >> >> >> All the official 9/11 fairytalers have is a book to refer to. And the >> "political science of politicians and beurocracts. >> ...Who probably could never make a living if they had to work in the >> real world, and not rely on grants/bursaries being handed to them >> >> It parallels the blind theological idiocy of the Crusades, and the >> Creationists.....even the Church of Scientology. >> It's just surprising that the 9/11 report didn't blame Satan, and Lord >> Zenu. > > Oh Gaud I love that video and many thanks for your post and great links. > > BTW I like the fact that you go one step further than AE911truth because > AE911truth doesn't like to address the obvious lies about any of the > jets. > As for me what finally convinced me that CGIs were used in Nuke York > City was when I saw what was really wrong with the Evan Fairbanks > video, what setup they would need to fabricate hundreds of videos and > then what they used to synchronize the real world with the bogus CGIs. > > Rocky Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth. http://www.ae911truth.org Very deliberately are sticking to the the proven actual physics and engineering of the failures of the 3 WTC towers. They have no need to be dragged off on tangents or speculation by the likes of trolls here. All that is certain is that there has yet, been no credible "official" reason why anything happened on 9/11. And the 9/11 truth movement demands an open full impatial investigation be done, where ALL the facts are made public. Saying something is a mystery or Act of God, and should be believed without question may work well in an organized religion. But it sucks in a lab. And "pancakes" are not a theory or a scientific term,.....they are breakfast.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 13:39 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. |
| Message-ID | <YbqdnayUsIht0H7InZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517913 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mrvg31$uhf$1@dont-email.me... > > > Rocky wrote: >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >> news:mrvd4t$hn8$1@dont-email.me... >>> >>> >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:mrv4o1$dhv$1@dont-email.me... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> BDK wrote: >>>>>> In article <mru01d$oil$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid >>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> gilber34 wrote: >>>>>>>> Rocky, the lying Squirrel has been ko0k-ing this same old schick >>>>>>>> since at least Dec 2013. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nothing new, old fart re-farting same fart, over and over, stuck >>>>>>>> in a DO loop. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/2014-01/0000.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this index goes back to 2003 ! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It just proves how 9/11 being an inside job,.....just won't go >>>>>>> away. No matter how many people spend billions to keep trying to >>>>>>> make it disappear >>>>>> >>>>>> It won't go away because Troofery is a terminal diesase with no >>>>>> known cure. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Spoken like a true flat earther. >>>>> I'm sure your ancestors were just as pissed off at Copernicus and >>>>> Galileo, with their unending "kookdom" about the earth being a ball. >>>>> >>>>> Awww, maybe you will feel better if you spend the day trying to find >>>>> a few witches to burn. >>>>> >>>>> Or you can watch this video. >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k >>>> >>>> HOLY SHIT that video also has the ground shaking event 12 seconds >>>> before the North Tower was vaporized. The event that the USGS managed >>>> to deny existed with their falsified seismic readings. >>>> >>>> Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the >>>> explosion that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was >>>> caught on camera and at the exact same time as that explosion an AM >>>> receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City recorded an EMP. >>>> >>>> I like the following video too but ask that the part about holograms >>>> be skipped over because the numerous people that didn't see any jets >>>> are proof that no holograms were used. >>>> >>>> Retired Expert Pilot John Lear - No Planes Hit the Towers on 9/11 >>>> (time indexed to start after an unnecessary discussion about >>>> holograms) https://youtu.be/YQBlv7sZGVE?t=1m45s >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> >>> >>> There is more proof to support the 9/11 truth movement. >>> With actual videos. >>> >>> here is another one. >>> Dr. Morgan Reynolds - The Fake Planes of 9/11 >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4d2Mt2a6iM >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> All the official 9/11 fairytalers have is a book to refer to. And the >>> "political science of politicians and beurocracts. >>> ...Who probably could never make a living if they had to work in the >>> real world, and not rely on grants/bursaries being handed to them >>> >>> It parallels the blind theological idiocy of the Crusades, and the >>> Creationists.....even the Church of Scientology. >>> It's just surprising that the 9/11 report didn't blame Satan, and Lord >>> Zenu. >> >> Oh Gaud I love that video and many thanks for your post and great links. >> >> BTW I like the fact that you go one step further than AE911truth because >> AE911truth doesn't like to address the obvious lies about any of the >> jets. >> As for me what finally convinced me that CGIs were used in Nuke York >> City was when I saw what was really wrong with the Evan Fairbanks >> video, what setup they would need to fabricate hundreds of videos and >> then what they used to synchronize the real world with the bogus CGIs. >> >> Rocky > > > > > Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth. > http://www.ae911truth.org > Very deliberately are sticking to the the proven actual physics and > engineering of the failures of the 3 WTC towers. > They have no need to be dragged off on tangents or speculation by the > likes of trolls here. > > All that is certain is that there has yet, been no credible "official" > reason why anything happened on 9/11. > And the 9/11 truth movement demands an open full impatial investigation be > done, where ALL the facts are made public. Agreed but two of the facts that AE911truth avoids and made me mad when I found out are 1..The damage done to Fiterman Hall which was the building north of WTC7. That damage was blamed on WTC7 but the damage was never properly explained because we know there was no flying debris from WTC7 so it rules out that excuse. 2. The remains of the Twin Towers because what was left standing can not be explained by a "Controlled Demoltion" or a "collapse." Only an NCD can explain what was left standing of the Twin Towers and why. And sadly there are two different nuke camps out there where one relies on heat signatures from the government to tell us where the nukes were planted and the other relies on the remaining walls of the Twin Towers to tell us where the nukes were planted. I side with the one that can explain why parts of the Twin Towers remained standing. > Saying something is a mystery or Act of God, and should be believed > without question may work well in an organized religion. > But it sucks in a lab. > And "pancakes" are not a theory or a scientific term,.....they are > breakfast. Talking about pancakes. One of the first things done was the pancake theory had to be thrown out because there were no pancaked floors at the bottom of the Twin Towers. But at the same time the collapse theory should have also been thrown out because of what was left standing at the very bottom of the Twin Towers. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 12:53 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.304cff0e547b395298c258@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517861 |
In article <mrv4o1$dhv$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > BDK wrote: > > In article <mru01d$oil$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > >> > >> gilber34 wrote: > >>> Rocky, the lying Squirrel has been ko0k-ing this same old schick since > >>> at least Dec 2013. > >>> > >>> Nothing new, old fart re-farting same fart, over and over, stuck in a > >>> DO loop. > >>> > >>> > >>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/2014-01/0000.html > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> this index goes back to 2003 ! > >>> > >>> http://alt.mailarchive.ca/astronomy/ > >> > >> > >> It just proves how 9/11 being an inside job,.....just won't go away. > >> No matter how many people spend billions to keep trying to make it > >> disappear > > > > It won't go away because Troofery is a terminal diesase with no known > > cure. > > > > > > Spoken like a true flat earther. No, just a sane person, who sees Troofery for the bullshit it is. > I'm sure your ancestors were just as pissed off at Copernicus and Galileo, > with their unending "kookdom" about the earth being a ball. I doubt it, but you're free to fantacize all you want. It's what your religion is.. > > Awww, maybe you will feel better if you spend the day trying to find a few > witches to burn. I'm sorry,but you have it backwards, you're the people imagining witches and other boogeymen. > > Or you can watch this video. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k I've seen it, and it's so stupid, it amazes me that even you fall for it. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 5 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 11:59 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. |
| Message-ID | <5eadnV0Pptw1q37InZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517897 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.304cff0e547b395298c258@news.giganews.com... > In article <mrv4o1$dhv$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >> >> Or you can watch this video. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k > > I've seen it, and it's so stupid, it amazes me that even you fall for > it. And you didn't tie the explosion 12 seconds before the vaporization of the North Tower to a deep underground nuke, the visible shaking of the North Tower and the simultaneous EMP recorded by an AM receiver owned by WCBS why? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 00:49 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. |
| Message-ID | <ef0147add5ebb68ebc8371883928e97e@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #517901 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL), in <news:5eadnV0Pptw1q37InZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > And you didn't tie the explosion 12 seconds before the vaporization of the > North Tower to a deep underground nuke, the visible shaking of the North > Tower and the simultaneous EMP recorded by an AM receiver owned by WCBS why? Because only a retarded kook would k'lame that a nuclear blast would take "12 seconds" (your words) to travel 77 meters (your words), you moron. IOW, the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" on the WCBS video (which was actually satellite uplink interference) and the tower shaking (which was the central column buckling) means we can use mathematics to determine how far away this k'lamed nuke was by comparing the time difference between the arrival of the "EMP" and the shaking... the "EMP" would have traveled at the speed of light, being electromagnetic in nature, the blast would have traveled at 5 to 13 kilometers per second, depending upon the composition of the soil. And given that the WTC towers sat on solid bedrock, it'd be at the upper end of that range. Educate yourself, you retard: <http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/seismology/keeping_track.php> "Body waves are composed of two principal types; the P (primary) wave, comparable to sound waves, which compresses and dilates the rock as it travels forward through the Earth; and the S (secondary) wave, which shakes the rock sideways as it advances at barely more than half the P-wave speed. The P wave is designated the primary preliminary wave because it is the first to arrive at a seismic station after an earthquake. It travels at a speed usually less than 6 kilometers per second in the Earth's crust and jumps to 13 kilometers per second through the core." So you've got one of two choices, neither of which resolves that giant gaping hole in your logic: 1) These supposed nukes were buried from 60 to 156 kilometers (37.28 to 96.93 *miles*) below the surface of the WTC towers? Back in 1968, when groundbreaking started on the WTC towers, and before we had the technology to drill much deeper than 13,000 feet (~2.5 miles). LOL 2) The supposed nukes were buried 77 meters below the surface, but the WCBS video didn't show any "EMP"... which destroys your kooky k'lame for there having been nuclear detonations in the first place. LOL That unresolvable logic hole in your kooky and utterly impossible conspiracy theory yet again rears its ugly head... why isn't a schizophrenic paranoid-delusional woman-stalking failed truck driver smart enough to resolve that hole in his kooky logic? LOL Moron. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 20 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). 19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. 20) Now you're saying the Ogallala Aquifer is radioactive (what's that got to do with the WTC?)... with absolutely no proof... all you have is the paranoid delusional rantings of other schizophrenics like you. Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 20 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL. Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 19:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) |
| Message-ID | <4P2dncEjEOiHAX7InZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517985 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:ef0147add5ebb68ebc8371883928e97e@dizum.com... > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman stalking failed truck driver from > East Moline, IL), in > <news:5eadnV0Pptw1q37InZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump > head first into the wood chipper again: > >> And you didn't tie the explosion 12 seconds before the vaporization of >> the >> North Tower to a deep underground nuke, the visible shaking of the North >> Tower and the simultaneous EMP recorded by an AM receiver owned by WCBS >> why? > > Because only a retarded kook would k'lame that a nuclear blast would > take "12 seconds" (your words) to travel 77 meters (your words), you > moron. And your evidence of how quickly a < 150kt nuke gets through solid rock is what? <G> > IOW, the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" on the WCBS video (which > was actually satellite uplink interference) And your evidence that WCBS used a satellite to receive data from their chopper instead of an AM receiver with a directional antenna is what? > and the tower shaking > (which was the central column buckling) ROTFLMAO because the following video shows an obvious explosion when the ground under WTC1 shook so bad that the shaking was recorded on video. First what I stated about the video then the link so the quote refers to the video after the following paragraph now. Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the explosion that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was caught on camera and at the exact same time as that explosion an AM receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City recorded an EMP. 9/11 Eyewitness rare unfiltered / unaltered amateur footage | What was NOT shown on TV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k And the fact that the sound from something quite some distance away and video are synchronized tells us one of two things. Either the sound was shifted to match the video or the sound of the nuclear explosion below WTC3 didn't travel via air but through the ground and that is possible if the microphone in the above video was not isolated from the ground and the camera was certainly sitting on the ground or the video would be shaky. <G> So once again we have proof of an enormous explosion/detonation that the USGS would not let us know anything about because their reading were obviously tainted. <G> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 17:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) |
| Message-ID | <8nsrvu.e77.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #517994 |
Rocky wrote: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message > news:ef0147add5ebb68ebc8371883928e97e@dizum.com... >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman stalking failed truck driver >> from East Moline, IL), in >> <news:5eadnV0Pptw1q37InZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump >> head first into the wood chipper again: >> >>> And you didn't tie the explosion 12 seconds before the vaporization >>> of the >>> North Tower to a deep underground nuke, the visible shaking of the >>> North Tower and the simultaneous EMP recorded by an AM receiver >>> owned by WCBS why? >> >> Because only a retarded kook would k'lame that a nuclear blast would >> take "12 seconds" (your words) to travel 77 meters (your words), you >> moron. > > And your evidence of how quickly a < 150kt nuke gets through solid > rock is what? <G> > > >> IOW, the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" on the WCBS video (which >> was actually satellite uplink interference) > > And your evidence that WCBS used a satellite to receive data from > their chopper instead of an AM receiver with a directional antenna is > what? > > >> and the tower shaking >> (which was the central column buckling) > > ROTFLMAO because the following video shows an obvious explosion when > the ground under WTC1 shook so bad that the shaking was recorded on > video. > > First what I stated about the video then the link so the quote refers > to the video after the following paragraph now. > > Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the > explosion that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was > caught on camera and at the exact same time as that explosion an AM > receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City recorded an EMP. > > 9/11 Eyewitness rare unfiltered / unaltered amateur footage | What > was NOT shown on TV > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k > > And the fact that the sound from something quite some distance away > and video are synchronized tells us one of two things. > > Either the sound was shifted to match the video or the sound of the > nuclear explosion below WTC3 didn't travel via air but through the > ground and that is possible if the microphone in the above video was > not isolated from the ground and the camera was certainly sitting on > the ground or the video would be shaky. <G> > > So once again we have proof of an enormous explosion/detonation that > the USGS would not let us know anything about because their reading > were obviously tainted. <G> > > Rocky did you hear that the trade towers got blowed up
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 19:44 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) |
| Message-ID | <O-udnXNJMPjmPn7InZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #517995 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8nsrvu.e77.19.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >> news:ef0147add5ebb68ebc8371883928e97e@dizum.com... >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman stalking failed truck driver >>> from East Moline, IL), in >>> <news:5eadnV0Pptw1q37InZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump >>> head first into the wood chipper again: >>> >>>> And you didn't tie the explosion 12 seconds before the vaporization >>>> of the >>>> North Tower to a deep underground nuke, the visible shaking of the >>>> North Tower and the simultaneous EMP recorded by an AM receiver >>>> owned by WCBS why? >>> >>> Because only a retarded kook would k'lame that a nuclear blast would >>> take "12 seconds" (your words) to travel 77 meters (your words), you >>> moron. >> >> And your evidence of how quickly a < 150kt nuke gets through solid >> rock is what? <G> >> >> >>> IOW, the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" on the WCBS video (which >>> was actually satellite uplink interference) >> >> And your evidence that WCBS used a satellite to receive data from >> their chopper instead of an AM receiver with a directional antenna is >> what? >>> and the tower shaking >>> (which was the central column buckling) >> >> ROTFLMAO because the following video shows an obvious explosion when >> the ground under WTC1 shook so bad that the shaking was recorded on >> video. First what I stated about the video then the link so the quote >> refers >> to the video after the following paragraph now. >> >> Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the >> explosion that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was >> caught on camera and at the exact same time as that explosion an AM >> receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City recorded an EMP. >> >> 9/11 Eyewitness rare unfiltered / unaltered amateur footage | What >> was NOT shown on TV >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k >> >> And the fact that the sound from something quite some distance away >> and video are synchronized tells us one of two things. >> >> Either the sound was shifted to match the video or the sound of the >> nuclear explosion below WTC3 didn't travel via air but through the >> ground and that is possible if the microphone in the above video was >> not isolated from the ground and the camera was certainly sitting on >> the ground or the video would be shaky. <G> >> >> So once again we have proof of an enormous explosion/detonation that >> the USGS would not let us know anything about because their reading >> were obviously tainted. <G> >> >> Rocky > > did you hear that the trade towers got blowed up No, I was allowed to see what was really left on the ground from the Twin Towers and then it was explained to me why there were outside walls that were left standing strong even after an alleged collapse. Obviously the collapse didn't reach the ground and the only thing that was really collapsing was a building that had already been pulverized by a nuke. See: http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 18:01 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) |
| Message-ID | <8nsu8t.n99.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #518006 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8nsrvu.e77.19.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>> news:ef0147add5ebb68ebc8371883928e97e@dizum.com... >>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>> >>>> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman stalking failed truck driver >>>> from East Moline, IL), in >>>> <news:5eadnV0Pptw1q37InZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly >>>> jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>> >>>>> And you didn't tie the explosion 12 seconds before the >>>>> vaporization >>>>> of the >>>>> North Tower to a deep underground nuke, the visible shaking of the >>>>> North Tower and the simultaneous EMP recorded by an AM receiver >>>>> owned by WCBS why? >>>> >>>> Because only a retarded kook would k'lame that a nuclear blast >>>> would take "12 seconds" (your words) to travel 77 meters (your >>>> words), you moron. >>> >>> And your evidence of how quickly a < 150kt nuke gets through solid >>> rock is what? <G> >>> >>> >>>> IOW, the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" on the WCBS video (which >>>> was actually satellite uplink interference) >>> >>> And your evidence that WCBS used a satellite to receive data from >>> their chopper instead of an AM receiver with a directional antenna >>> is what? >>>> and the tower shaking >>>> (which was the central column buckling) >>> >>> ROTFLMAO because the following video shows an obvious explosion when >>> the ground under WTC1 shook so bad that the shaking was recorded on >>> video. First what I stated about the video then the link so the >>> quote refers >>> to the video after the following paragraph now. >>> >>> Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the >>> explosion that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was >>> caught on camera and at the exact same time as that explosion an AM >>> receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City recorded an EMP. >>> >>> 9/11 Eyewitness rare unfiltered / unaltered amateur footage | What >>> was NOT shown on TV >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k >>> >>> And the fact that the sound from something quite some distance away >>> and video are synchronized tells us one of two things. >>> >>> Either the sound was shifted to match the video or the sound of the >>> nuclear explosion below WTC3 didn't travel via air but through the >>> ground and that is possible if the microphone in the above video was >>> not isolated from the ground and the camera was certainly sitting on >>> the ground or the video would be shaky. <G> >>> >>> So once again we have proof of an enormous explosion/detonation that >>> the USGS would not let us know anything about because their reading >>> were obviously tainted. <G> >>> >>> Rocky >> >> did you hear that the trade towers got blowed up > > No, I was allowed to see what was really left on the ground from the > Twin Towers and then it was explained to me why there were outside > walls that were left standing strong even after an alleged collapse. > > Obviously the collapse didn't reach the ground and the only thing > that was really collapsing was a building that had already been > pulverized by a nuke. See: > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky well the rumor is they got blowed up
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 20:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) |
| Message-ID | <ha2dnRsoDtGsN37InZ2dnUU7-TWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518008 |
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8nsu8t.n99.17.1@news.alt.net... > Rocky wrote: >> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8nsrvu.e77.19.1@news.alt.net... >>> Rocky wrote: >>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>>> news:ef0147add5ebb68ebc8371883928e97e@dizum.com... >>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>>> >>>>> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman stalking failed truck driver >>>>> from East Moline, IL), in >>>>> <news:5eadnV0Pptw1q37InZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly >>>>> jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>> >>>>>> And you didn't tie the explosion 12 seconds before the >>>>>> vaporization of the >>>>>> North Tower to a deep underground nuke, the visible shaking of the >>>>>> North Tower and the simultaneous EMP recorded by an AM receiver >>>>>> owned by WCBS why? >>>>> >>>>> Because only a retarded kook would k'lame that a nuclear blast >>>>> would take "12 seconds" (your words) to travel 77 meters (your >>>>> words), you moron. >>>> >>>> And your evidence of how quickly a < 150kt nuke gets through solid >>>> rock is what? <G> >>>> >>>> >>>>> IOW, the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" on the WCBS video (which >>>>> was actually satellite uplink interference) >>>> >>>> And your evidence that WCBS used a satellite to receive data from >>>> their chopper instead of an AM receiver with a directional antenna >>>> is what? >>>>> and the tower shaking >>>>> (which was the central column buckling) >>>> >>>> ROTFLMAO because the following video shows an obvious explosion when >>>> the ground under WTC1 shook so bad that the shaking was recorded on >>>> video. First what I stated about the video then the link so the >>>> quote refers >>>> to the video after the following paragraph now. >>>> >>>> Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the >>>> explosion that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was >>>> caught on camera and at the exact same time as that explosion an AM >>>> receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City recorded an EMP. >>>> >>>> 9/11 Eyewitness rare unfiltered / unaltered amateur footage | What >>>> was NOT shown on TV >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k >>>> >>>> And the fact that the sound from something quite some distance away >>>> and video are synchronized tells us one of two things. >>>> >>>> Either the sound was shifted to match the video or the sound of the >>>> nuclear explosion below WTC3 didn't travel via air but through the >>>> ground and that is possible if the microphone in the above video was >>>> not isolated from the ground and the camera was certainly sitting on >>>> the ground or the video would be shaky. <G> >>>> >>>> So once again we have proof of an enormous explosion/detonation that >>>> the USGS would not let us know anything about because their reading >>>> were obviously tainted. <G> >>>> >>>> Rocky >>> >>> did you hear that the trade towers got blowed up >> >> No, I was allowed to see what was really left on the ground from the >> Twin Towers and then it was explained to me why there were outside >> walls that were left standing strong even after an alleged collapse. >> >> Obviously the collapse didn't reach the ground and the only thing >> that was really collapsing was a building that had already been >> pulverized by a nuke. See: >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >> >> Rocky > > well the rumor is they got blowed up Part of the Twin Towers were blown up and there are plenty of videos to prove that but what was left behind of the Twin Towers could only be the result of a Nuclear Controlled Demolition. See the link at the very bottom of this post but first some quotes from the link: :5. If you are over 500 feet below the sound at street level and over 1500 feet away, sound travels up and out. You don’t hear much. The same with the shock wave. 6. All underground explosions took place 50 feet below you and 1500 feet or more from the cameras. You get a shock wave traveling thru the ground, with a dust blast from the over pressure of less than 6 psi for a small 1.5kt nuke. Just as happened. The air burst above the 50th floor blew out 200 X 200 X 200 square feet of building space, over 20 floors, in less than 3 seconds. Vaporized, gone, What does that? (Root Beer bottles exploding?) http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/28/nuclear-911-revealed-theories-and-disinformation-the-misguided-and-the-inhuman/ Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 20:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) |
| Message-ID | <8nt69d.hsq.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #518011 |
Rocky wrote: > "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8nsu8t.n99.17.1@news.alt.net... >> Rocky wrote: >>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:8nsrvu.e77.19.1@news.alt.net... >>>> Rocky wrote: >>>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" >>>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message >>>>> news:ef0147add5ebb68ebc8371883928e97e@dizum.com... >>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>>>> >>>>>> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman stalking failed truck driver >>>>>> from East Moline, IL), in >>>>>> <news:5eadnV0Pptw1q37InZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly >>>>>> jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>>> >>>>>>> And you didn't tie the explosion 12 seconds before the >>>>>>> vaporization of the >>>>>>> North Tower to a deep underground nuke, the visible shaking of >>>>>>> the North Tower and the simultaneous EMP recorded by an AM receiver >>>>>>> owned by WCBS why? >>>>>> >>>>>> Because only a retarded kook would k'lame that a nuclear blast >>>>>> would take "12 seconds" (your words) to travel 77 meters (your >>>>>> words), you moron. >>>>> >>>>> And your evidence of how quickly a < 150kt nuke gets through solid >>>>> rock is what? <G> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> IOW, the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" on the WCBS video >>>>>> (which was actually satellite uplink interference) >>>>> >>>>> And your evidence that WCBS used a satellite to receive data from >>>>> their chopper instead of an AM receiver with a directional antenna >>>>> is what? >>>>>> and the tower shaking >>>>>> (which was the central column buckling) >>>>> >>>>> ROTFLMAO because the following video shows an obvious explosion >>>>> when the ground under WTC1 shook so bad that the shaking was recorded >>>>> on video. First what I stated about the video then the link so the >>>>> quote refers >>>>> to the video after the following paragraph now. >>>>> >>>>> Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the >>>>> explosion that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was >>>>> caught on camera and at the exact same time as that explosion an >>>>> AM receiver operated by WCBS in Nuke York City recorded an EMP. >>>>> >>>>> 9/11 Eyewitness rare unfiltered / unaltered amateur footage | What >>>>> was NOT shown on TV >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlIUGqai81k >>>>> >>>>> And the fact that the sound from something quite some distance >>>>> away and video are synchronized tells us one of two things. >>>>> >>>>> Either the sound was shifted to match the video or the sound of >>>>> the nuclear explosion below WTC3 didn't travel via air but through the >>>>> ground and that is possible if the microphone in the above video >>>>> was not isolated from the ground and the camera was certainly sitting >>>>> on the ground or the video would be shaky. <G> >>>>> >>>>> So once again we have proof of an enormous explosion/detonation >>>>> that the USGS would not let us know anything about because their >>>>> reading were obviously tainted. <G> >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> did you hear that the trade towers got blowed up >>> >>> No, I was allowed to see what was really left on the ground from the >>> Twin Towers and then it was explained to me why there were outside >>> walls that were left standing strong even after an alleged collapse. >>> >>> Obviously the collapse didn't reach the ground and the only thing >>> that was really collapsing was a building that had already been >>> pulverized by a nuke. See: >>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg >>> >>> Rocky >> >> well the rumor is they got blowed up > > Part of the Twin Towers were blown up and there are plenty of videos > to prove that but what was left behind of the Twin Towers could only be > the result of a Nuclear Controlled Demolition. See the link at the very > bottom of this post but first some quotes from the link: > >> 5. If you are over 500 feet below the sound at street level and over >> 1500 > feet away, sound travels up and out. You don’t hear much. The same > with the shock wave. > > 6. All underground explosions took place 50 feet below you and 1500 > feet or more from the cameras. You get a shock wave traveling thru the > ground, with a dust blast from the over pressure of less than 6 psi for a > small > 1.5kt nuke. Just as happened. > > The air burst above the 50th floor blew out 200 X 200 X 200 square > feet of building space, over 20 floors, in less than 3 seconds. Vaporized, > gone, What does that? (Root Beer bottles exploding?) > > http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/08/28/nuclear-911-revealed-theories-and-disinformation-the-misguided-and-the-inhuman/ > > > Rocky so what
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 00:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) |
| Message-ID | <rujcbc-j0r.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #517994 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> Because only a retarded kook would k'lame that a nuclear blast would >> take "12 seconds" (your words) to travel 77 meters (your words), you >> moron. > > And your evidence of how quickly a < 150kt nuke gets through solid rock is > what? <G> Hundreds of nuclear tests around the world. >> IOW, the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" on the WCBS video (which >> was actually satellite uplink interference) > > And your evidence that WCBS used a satellite to receive data from their > chopper instead of an AM receiver with a directional antenna is what? The FCC license database. <snip remaining delusional kook drool> Get help and you may be able to keep a job. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 19:58 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) |
| Message-ID | <Ppqdnf3TUZZ6O37InZ2dnUU7-fGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518007 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:rujcbc-j0r.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>> Because only a retarded kook would k'lame that a nuclear blast would >>> take "12 seconds" (your words) to travel 77 meters (your words), you >>> moron. >> >> And your evidence of how quickly a < 150kt nuke gets through solid rock >> is >> what? <G> > > Hundreds of nuclear tests around the world. Bad guess because that does not explain why we were not given access to any of the data collected by the underground nuke testing that used all the fiber optic cables to monitor them for some strange reason. And it had to be a Russian that informed people in the US that the Twin Towers were nuked. <G> >>> IOW, the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" on the WCBS video (which >>> was actually satellite uplink interference) >> >> And your evidence that WCBS used a satellite to receive data from their >> chopper instead of an AM receiver with a directional antenna is what? > > The FCC license database. Bsd guess because you have no idea what is in that database or what they used on 9/11/01. And again, if NIST could explain how 100 floors of a skyscraper could fall down and yet leave so much untouched at the very bottom of the same skyscraper then why didn't they? <G> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 02:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) |
| Message-ID | <2cpcbc-qfr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518009 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:rujcbc-j0r.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>> Because only a retarded kook would k'lame that a nuclear blast would >>>> take "12 seconds" (your words) to travel 77 meters (your words), you >>>> moron. >>> >>> And your evidence of how quickly a < 150kt nuke gets through solid rock >>> is >>> what? <G> >> >> Hundreds of nuclear tests around the world. > > Bad guess because that does not explain why we were not given access to any > of the data collected by the underground nuke testing that used all the > fiber optic cables to monitor them for some strange reason. Gibbering, incoherent, nonsense. > Bsd guess because you have no idea what is in that database or what they > used on 9/11/01. Wrong again, kooktard. You haven't the slightest clue how anything in the real world works, do you kook? Your delusional fantasies and your ignorance explains why you can't hold a job, kook. <snip remaining kook ravings> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 22:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) |
| Message-ID | <NbednU_tiPGGWX7InZ2dnUU7-KudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #518027 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:2cpcbc-qfr.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: Even though there are still a lot of things that point to the fact nukes were used in Nuke York City I want to address the fact that THERE WERE NO FUCKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE Published on Mar 22, 2014 Completed 3/22/2014 by James Easton and Steve Grage THE EPITOME OF NO PLANES FILMS on the subject. Are you a No Brainer? Then you probably believe there were PLANES on 9/11. Well... THERE WEREN'T! Produced by James Easton of WAKEUP PRODUCTIONS, creator of 9/11 The BIGGEST LIE which has 700,000 views on Youtube. Steve Grage is a credentialed ENGINEER with 25 years experience. This is no joke. Word is spreading. Pretty soon you too will be saying THERE WERE NO FUCKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! James Easton - September 20, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 05:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) |
| Message-ID | <av5dbc-bls.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #518037 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Even though there are still a lot of things that point to the fact nukes > were used in Nuke York City I want to address the fact that > THERE WERE NO FUCKIN PLANES ON 9/11 PERIOD! Yes, there were in fact 4 airplanes involved in 9/11 but your delusions don't let you see that. If you get professional help you may be able to hold a job and find a woman that doesn't respond to you with a restraining order. <snip remaining delusional raving> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 05:47 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 was an inside job. (USGS missed a big explosion) |
| Message-ID | <6cc544e586d35bbd8c9ced64b1e07991@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #517994 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking schizophrenic paranoid-delusional failed truck driver), in <news:4P2dncEjEOiHAX7InZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:ef0147add5ebb68ebc8371883928e97e@dizum.com... >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the woman stalking failed truck driver from >> East Moline, IL), in >> <news:5eadnV0Pptw1q37InZ2dnUU7-aednZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump >> head first into the wood chipper again: >>> And you didn't tie the explosion 12 seconds before the vaporization of >>> the North Tower to a deep underground nuke, the visible shaking of the North >>> Tower and the simultaneous EMP recorded by an AM receiver owned by WCBS >>> why? >> Because only a retarded kook would k'lame that a nuclear blast would >> take "12 seconds" (your words) to travel 77 meters (your words), you >> moron. > And your evidence of how quickly a < 150kt nuke gets through solid rock is > what? <G> It doesn't matter *what* *size* the fucking nuke is, you retarded halfwit. An EMP will travel at the speed of light. The compressive blast from *any* explosion underground will be transmitted at the speed that is allowed by the composition of the soil. And solid rock transmits sound pretty damned fast. Thus, your kooky k'lame of the WCBS video satellite uplink interference being an "EMP" as 'proof' of your k'lame that a nuclear weapon was detonated and your further k'lame that the WTC tower central column buckling and thus shaking being 'proof' of the compressive blast of that k'lamed nuclear weapon means we can track how far away that purported nuclear weapon was from the tower by comparing the times of arrival of the k'lamed "EMP" and the shaking of the tower... and in this case, it'd put your k'lamed nukes somewhere between 37 and 96 *miles* below the surface. So you're left with one of two options: 1) These supposed nukes were buried from 60 to 156 kilometers (37.28 to 96.93 *miles*) below the surface of the WTC towers? Back in 1968, when groundbreaking started on the WTC towers, and before we had the technology to drill much deeper than 13,000 feet (~2.5 miles). LOL 2) The supposed nukes were buried 77 meters below the surface, but the WCBS video didn't show any "EMP"... which destroys your kooky k'lame for there having been nuclear detonations in the first place. LOL That unresolvable logic hole in your kooky and utterly impossible conspiracy theory yet again rears its ugly head... why isn't a schizophrenic paranoid-delusional woman-stalking failed truck driver smart enough to resolve that hole in his kooky logic? LOL Moron. LOL >> IOW, the timing between your k'lamed "EMP" on the WCBS video (which >> was actually satellite uplink interference) > And your evidence that WCBS used a satellite to receive data from their > chopper instead of an AM receiver with a directional antenna is what? Because WCBS is a CBS affiliate, and *all* affiliates use satellite feeds, you retarded nong. LOL That's so CBS corporate can patch any regional video through to a nationwide audience in a matter of seconds, which they couldn't do if satellite feed wasn't used. Ferfucksake you're retarded, Roger. Moron. LOL >> and the tower shaking >> (which was the central column buckling) > ROT<SMACKAKOOK!> > Starting at 44:26 in the above video you can see evidence of the explosion > that shook the North Tower so violently the shaking was caught on camera and > at the exact same time You didn't k'lame "the exact same time" before, you backpedaling moron, you've been k'laming a 12 second difference between the WCBS video disturbance and the tower shaking. But thank you for tacitly admitting *you* *were* *wrong*... I'm backing your retarded ass into a corner and pummeling you with the truth. I'll knock some reality into that broken brain of yours if it fucking kills you. Moron. LOL > as that explosion an AM receiver operated by WCBS in > Nuke York City recorded an EMP. Then it cannot be an EMP, you retarded halfwitted idiot. Do you not understand that EMPs and compressive blasts travel at different speeds? Your k'lamed 12 second difference between the WCBS video "EMP" (satellite uplink interference) and the tower shaking (the central column buckling) means no EMP could have taken place unless those k'lamed nukes were 37 to 96 *miles* underground... So of course, now your broken brain says "DDUUUURRRHHH! Someone must have altered the time on the camera!" because you're such a fucking simpleton that after you'd k'lamed for *months* that the camera time was spot-on and therefore that 12 second delay between EMP and shaking *had* to have occurred, after *you* *were* *proven* *wrong*, your broken brain squirmed and desperately grasped whatever unreasonable explanation it could so you wouldn't have to *admit* you were wrong. And in this case, your broken brain grasped at the "clock time was changed! Duuurrrhhh!" explanation. But here's something, you retarded fuckwit... *if* the WCBS video time had been changed, it'd show a difference in the time of the tower shaking and falling, a difference that would be apparent when compared to *all* *other* *videos* of the event... and they *all* correspond to the correct time, including the WCBS video. And that's not to mention the actual 14 second (you k'lame 12 seconds, but kooks can't count) difference between that WCBS video disturbance (satellite uplink interference) and the tower shaking (central column buckling)... so your broken brain now k'laming they occurred at the same time is utter bullshit, as can be seen by viewing that video *which* *you* *provided* as proof of your k'lame of nuclear detonations in the first place. So your broken little brain is trapped with no way out this time... that unresolvable logic hole in your utterly impossible kooky conspiracy theory proves yet again that what your schizophrenic paranoid-delusional brain is telling you happened, didn't actually happen. Take your anti-psychotic meds, Roger Wittekind. Moron. LOL > 9/<SMACKAKOOK!> The rest of your retarded blather is dismissed. If you're so retarded you can't even resolve your unresolvable logic hole, your conspiracy theory is utterly impossible, it could not have happened. Take your anti-psychotic meds, Roger Wittekind. Moron. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 20 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). 19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind. 20) Now you're saying the Ogallala Aquifer is radioactive (what's that got to do with the WTC?)... with absolutely no proof... all you have is the paranoid delusional rantings of other schizophrenics like you. Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 20 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Roger T.E. Wittekind PO Box 471 167 40th Avenue East Moline, IL 61244 309-755-6374 309-755-6394 Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East Moline, IL. Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web