Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #556729 > unrolled thread

Do You Dispute Any of This, Mike?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Do You Dispute Any of This, Mike? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 17:20 -0800
    Re: Do You Dispute Any of This, Mike? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-25 19:40 -0600
    Re: Do You Dispute Any of This, Mike? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 02:11 +0000
    Re: Do You Dispute Any of This, Mike? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 20:37 -0600

#556729 — Do You Dispute Any of This, Mike?

http://scottishsceptic.co.uk/2011/08/26/how-to-get-off-the-ground-with-nothing-but-water-almost/#comment-39151

Mike:
For example, if you have something like the jet-stream, they have to be driven by some energy source. Likewise if you have oceanic currents - they have to have some energy source. So, just follow the energy flows and you'll understand atmospheric physics.

James:
I don't disagree.  The flow of the jet streams must be in compliance with fundamental physics.  Moreover, it is indisputable, IMO, that the up-down nature of convection cannot explain the lateral and highly focused flow of the jet streams.

Do you not agree with this last statement?  

And if a that is true, there must be some other source of flow in the atmosphere that is independent of convection. Given the jet streams magnitude-supporting wind speeds upward of 300 mph-is it not undeniable that this unnamed alternate source of flow is much more energetic than is that of convection? Moreover, is it not possible that this unnamed form of flow might on occasion be oriented vertically to explain some, or even most all, of the observations that have been attributed to convection.

Do you dispute any of this, Mike?

Do you have any explanation for this, "other source of flow in the atmosphere that is independent of convection?"  How would you describe it?  

How does your description compare with those that I describe in my two videos herein: (see below)
Convection Versus Plasma
and
Alternative to Spiritualistic Thinking in the Atmospheric Sciences

Cheers,

James McGinn

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#556735

On 2/25/2016 7:20 PM, James McGinn wrote:


don't post your troll blog here James "blowhardpotatoes" McGinn


McGinn eats cold steam with each breath...

I hang my wet shirt out to dry on the clothesline after an hour it is
completely dry.  there was no wet spot under the shirt at all.

how did the water get out ?

No "smoke" came off it at all.

did my shirt out-gas ?  did the water come out as a gas ?

water gas ?  Water Vapor ?  Humidity ?


so How can that happen when you say there is no such thing on earth ?

a counter example you refuse to answer ?

did you make a mistake ?

It blows a HUGE hole in you.


ANSWER NOW !!!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556747

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://scottishsceptic.co.uk/2011/08/26/how-to-get-off-the-ground-with-nothing-but-water-almost/#comment-39151
> 
> Mike:

Who is Mike and when are you going to learn how to limit text lines to
78 characters or less?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#556753

On 2/25/16 7:20 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> For example, if you have something like the jet-stream, they have to
> be driven by some energy source. Likewise if you have oceanic
> currents - they have to have some energy source. So, just follow the
> energy flows and you'll understand atmospheric physics.


   The energy source that drives the earth's weather is the sun, James.


   The problem appears to be your lack of understanding of the following:

   Water vapour (H2O) like Oxygen (O2) like Nitrogen (N2) is an invisible
   gas. There is nothing to see.

 > Water vapour (H2O molecules)

 > Water vapor, water vapour or aqueous vapor, is the *gaseous phase* of
 > water. It is one state of water within the hydrosphere. Water vapor
 > can be produced from the *evaporation or boiling of liquid water* or
 > from the *sublimation of ice* . Unlike other forms of water, water
 > vapor is invisible. Under typical atmospheric conditions, water vapor
 > is continuously generated by evaporation and removed by condensation.
 > It is *lighter than air* and *triggers convection currents* that can
 > lead to clouds.




-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web