Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #719834 > unrolled thread

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2018-12-20 19:11 -0800
    Re: The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 13:03 -0500
      Re: The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2018-12-21 11:46 -0800
        Re: The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-21 20:24 +0000
          Re: The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-21 16:42 -0500
    The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-12-27 17:03 -0800

#719834 — The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Discovery of Global Warming - February 2016 version
  https://www.aip.org/history/climate/index.htm#contents

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect
  http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm

  "In the 19th century, scientists realized that gases in the
  atmosphere cause a "greenhouse effect" which affects the
  planet's temperature. These scientists were interested
  chiefly in the possibility that a lower level of carbon
  dioxide gas might explain the ice ages of the distant past.
  At the turn of the century, Svante Arrhenius calculated that
  emissions from human industry might someday bring a global
  warming. In 1938, G.S. Callendar argued that the level of
  carbon dioxide was climbing and raising global temperature,
  but most scientists found his arguments implausible. It was
  almost by chance that a few researchers in the 1950s
  discovered that global warming truly was possible. 

  "In the early 1960s, C.D. Keeling measured the level of carbon
  dioxide in the atmosphere: it was rising fast. Researchers began
  to take an interest, struggling to understand how the level of
  carbon dioxide had changed in the past, and how the level was
  influenced by chemical and biological forces. They found that the
  gas plays a crucial role in climate change, so that the rising
  level could gravely affect our future."

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#719926

On 12/20/2018 10:11 PM, sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Discovery of Global Warming - February 2016 version
>    https://www.aip.org/history/climate/index.htm#contents
> 
> The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect
>    http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm
> 
>    "In the 19th century, scientists realized that gases in the
>    atmosphere cause a "greenhouse effect" which affects the
>    planet's temperature. These scientists were interested
>    chiefly in the possibility that a lower level of carbon
>    dioxide gas might explain the ice ages of the distant past.
>    At the turn of the century, Svante Arrhenius calculated that
>    emissions from human industry might someday bring a global
>    warming. In 1938, G.S. Callendar argued that the level of
>    carbon dioxide was climbing and raising global temperature,
>    but most scientists found his arguments implausible. It was
>    almost by chance that a few researchers in the 1950s
>    discovered that global warming truly was possible.
> 
>    "In the early 1960s, C.D. Keeling measured the level of carbon
>    dioxide in the atmosphere: it was rising fast. Researchers began
>    to take an interest, struggling to understand how the level of
>    carbon dioxide had changed in the past, and how the level was
>    influenced by chemical and biological forces. They found that the
>    gas plays a crucial role in climate change, so that the rising
>    level could gravely affect our future."
> 
If CO2 causes warming, you had better explain how from 1940 to 1970 CO2 
went UP and temperature wend DOWN!  Not only is that the opposite of 
cause, you don't even have correlation! How many times do you need to 
repeat a lie to make it true?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719969

No matter how you fit the 30-year trend line, the earth warmed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719973

sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote:
> No matter how you fit the 30-year trend line, the earth warmed.

OMG, the earth warmed.

You should kill yourself immediately to avoid a horrible end.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#719990

On 12/21/2018 3:24 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote:
>> No matter how you fit the 30-year trend line, the earth warmed.
> 
> OMG, the earth warmed.
> 
> You should kill yourself immediately to avoid a horrible end.
> 
Yeah, who knows how awful that .9 degrees since 1880 is going to be to 
life on our planet? And Sammy, watch out for that 2mm per year sea level 
rise! I"d start running now to get a head start.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721183 — The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide.

> The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

The only thing plants love more than a greenhouse is carbon dioxide.

56 million years ago (@PETM), the Arctic was tropical, not icy;
then and there, we primates first appeared.  3 million years later,
we were most everywhere.  22 million years later, the poles froze.

4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web