Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #519104 > unrolled thread

Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 11:50 -0500
    Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
      Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 11:38 -0400
        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:17 -0500
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:35 -0500
            Re: Rocky incoherent again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:07 +0000
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:09 -0500
                Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:21 +0000
                  Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:45 -0500
                    Re: Rocky the stalking lunatic raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 19:26 +0000
                      Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 16:21 -0500
                        Re: Rocky still delusional jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:38 +0000
                          Re: Strange Features Found in the Naudet Brothers First Strike Footage (jimp forgets about freeze frame again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:08 -0500
                            Re: Rocky continues to have delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 22:32 +0000
                        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (jimp lies about missing debris) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:06 -0500
                          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (K proves she lies about Dimitri) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:27 -0500
                            Re: Rocky raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 16:34 +0000
                              Re: Rocky raves on "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:45 -0500
                            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Roger has to lie, per his mental defect(s)) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
                    Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 15:01 -0500
                  Re: Rocky still a delusional stalker "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 15:38 -0400
                    Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 19:33 -0500
                      Re: Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-08 03:34 +0000
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - (Roger is caught lying again.) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 14:55 -0500
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! - (K  is caught bulshitting again.) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 15:26 -0500
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - Why does Roger keep using the same lies? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 16:21 -0500
                  Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (test for K the kook) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:22 -0500
                    Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (test for K the kook) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-07 02:19 +0000
                      Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 01:23 -0500
                        Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-08 01:02 +0000
                          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! (Michael fails the cartoon physics blind test twice) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:39 -0500
                    Re: 9/11 building collapses - Why is Roger DESPERATE to divert attention from his own claims? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:10 -0500
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 16:15 -0400
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 16:22 -0500
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K stop your bickering) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:55 -0500
                Re: Rocky's imaginary nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 00:29 +0000
                Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K stop your bickering) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:12 -0500
                  Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K poves she is a complete asshole) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 11:42 -0500
                    Re: stalker rocky babbles on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 16:49 +0000
                    Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!  (K poves she is a complete asshole) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:45 -0500
          Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 10:29 -0400
            Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:44 -0500
              Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-07 19:11 -0400
    Re: Rocky has more delusions and is still jobless jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:55 +0000
      Re: 9/11 building collapses - PROOF of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 03:39 -0500
        Re: Yet more Rocky delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:01 +0000

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#519539

In article <ojpouatmgsr2h185it6mq4mlk8af2avoun@4ax.com>, 
compuelf@gmail.com says...
> 
> On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 11:38:23 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
> >Tony Dragon wrote:
> >> On 05/09/2015 17:50, Rocky wrote:
> >>> "Freedom Fighter" <liberty@once.net> wrote in message
> >>> news:fnAVl.48267$d36.34889@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >>>> 9/11 building collapses - it WAS controlled demolition!
> >>>>
> >>>> The proof? - watch this video:
> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO2yT0uBQbM&feature=player_embedded
> >>>
> >>> WTF?
> >>>
> >>> The first thing you have to do is realize the media wants you to think
> >>> the Twin Towers collapsed to the ground but there is another story.
> >>
> >> Will this story be eligible for the Man Booker Prize?
> >>
> >>> The fact is the Twin Towers left very little on the ground
> >>
> >> Why did this nothing take so many dumptrucks to get rid of it then.
> >> You know about the dumptrucks, you posted a link about them.
> >>
> >>> and the twin towers left lot in the air
> >>
> >> So it's still there?
> >>
> >>> which are both tell tale signs of a nuclear
> >>> controlled demolition.
> >>
> >> Well as there was no ncd the above is incorrect.
> >>
> >>> And the lack of any radiation reading prove they were never published.
> >>>
> >> But the link about radiation has been posted, and you have told us about
> >> Geiger counters going off.
> >> You really should remember what you yourself posted.
> >>
> >>
> >>> And even though the North Tower shook like a tuning fork for a few
> >>> seconds before it was vaporized the fact seismic data didn't show the
> >>> North Tower shaking proves the seismic records were as bogus as the
> >>> jets were.
> >>
> >> What I can't understand is why the Russians, Chinese, Koreans etc tell
> >> the whole world about these nukes.
> >>
> >> Can you explain that?
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >Wait a few more months until China and Russia no longer use the US dollar as 
> >their base currency.
> 
>      They don't do so now. China uses the Yuan Renminbi (often
> refereed to simply as Renminbi. Russia uses the Ruble.
> 
> >Then a lot will be coming out, as they won't lose any money over the theft 
> >and exposure of corruption the US now uses in it's day to day business 
> >affairs.
> >
> >You don't get rich from sending someone to jail that owes you money.
> 
>      Maybe so, maybe no.
>      If you can attach their assets you have a chance at it.

One more thing Bast is clueless about..

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519644

On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:29:07 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:

[...]

>> >You don't get rich from sending someone to jail that owes you money.
>> 
>>      Maybe so, maybe no.
>>      If you can attach their assets you have a chance at it.
>
>One more thing Bast is clueless about..

     I'd make a list, but fear I'd end up with writer's cramp. If I
were to type it all out, I risk carpel tunnel syndrome.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519653

In article <qp4sua99lrka16v1rdqut7tol4v76oic92@4ax.com>, 
compuelf@gmail.com says...
> 
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:29:07 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> >You don't get rich from sending someone to jail that owes you money.
> >> 
> >>      Maybe so, maybe no.
> >>      If you can attach their assets you have a chance at it.
> >
> >One more thing Bast is clueless about..
> 
>      I'd make a list, but fear I'd end up with writer's cramp. If I
> were to type it all out, I risk carpel tunnel syndrome.

A more efficient list would be to just make a list of stuff Bast does 
have a clue about...

Umm......hmmmm....well...



-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519124 — Re: Rocky has more delusions and is still jobless

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
Yet another steaming pile of delusional nonsense.

Perhaps if his time were spent in therapy and education, he might lose
the delusions and be able to hold a job.

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519235

<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:reqrbc-8mn.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

< Jim's flat out lies trashed >

Ok Jim, try to focus on just one item only and that is why there is no 
shadow on Phantom Flight 175.

To help you see exactly what I'm talking about I've indexed the following 
video to start at 13:34 and if you miss it then just go back to 13:34.  DUH.

Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
 https://youtu.be/p1D1C94eE8U?t=13m34s

And given that we were flat out lied to about the jets in Nuke York City why 
not lie about everything else too including your seismic readings that have 
no reading for when the North Tower shook and shook and shook?

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#519289 — Re: Yet more Rocky delusions

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> Ok Jim, try to focus on just one item only and that is why there is no 
> shadow on Phantom Flight 175.

"Phantom Flight 175" is a product of your delusional mind, kook.

Chasing shadows is a symptom of mental illness, kook.

The facts are some airliners were hijacked.

Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires
which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed
almost 2 hours later.

One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the
western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature
that can be detected anywhere on the planet.

There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the 
collapse of the two towers as well as the plane crash at the Pentagon
and the crash in Pennsyvania were detected.

This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11.

Everything else is kook babble.

That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble.

That there is missing rubble is kook babble.

That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble.

That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble.

That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear
devices is kook babble.

That there was an EMP is kook babble.

That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not
seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble.

That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything
to do with what happened is kook babble.

That the scene was radioactive is kook babble.

That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima
or Nagasaki is kook babble.

That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear
is kook babble.

That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance 
and still be expected to work is kook babble.

That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear
bombs is kook babble.

That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the
airplanes hit the towers is kook babble.

That all the video was CGI is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble.

That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the
windows is kook babble.

That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble.

That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion
is kook babble.

There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to
ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble.

Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble.

Rantings about specially treated dirt is kook babble.

Saying people worship their television and capitalizing "television" is
kook babble.

Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble.


<snip remaining kook babble>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web