Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #701080 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-04 11:02 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-05 19:37 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 47 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Ignoring climate change puts public at risk kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-04 11:02 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 11:16 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-04 10:58 -0500
Reckless living/breeding. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 11:33 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-04 14:58 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 13:23 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-09-06 21:16 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-05 14:36 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 13:25 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-05 16:30 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 13:42 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-05 17:25 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 16:12 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-06 15:35 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 12:37 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-06 20:44 +0100
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 13:05 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-06 21:16 +0100
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 13:41 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-06 21:49 +0100
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 13:52 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-06 22:04 +0100
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 14:09 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-06 22:32 +0100
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 14:37 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-06 22:41 +0100
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 14:43 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-06 21:26 +0000
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-06 22:38 +0100
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-07 01:49 +0000
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-06 13:23 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-06 16:39 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-05 17:27 -0500
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-09-05 20:35 +0000
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-05 21:22 +0000
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 16:10 -0700
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-05 21:37 -0500
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-06 03:09 +0000
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:42 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-06 09:45 -0500
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-06 12:23 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-06 12:15 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:40 -0400
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-06 09:51 -0500
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-06 21:13 +0000
Re: Ignoring climate change puts public at risk benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 19:37 -0400
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 21:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nuq78e.q7by2qbji2qwN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #701409 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> i got noted > >>> > >>> Were you recorded also? > >>> > >> nope , just noted > > > > Who is the offishul noter and recorder these fine days? > > > skeeter still as far as i know That accounts for it then, Skeet was AWOL. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 13:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <biopii.9p7.17.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #701410 |
On 2018-09-06 1:49 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> i got noted >>>>> >>>>> Were you recorded also? >>>>> >>>> nope , just noted >>> >>> Who is the offishul noter and recorder these fine days? >>> >> skeeter still as far as i know > > That accounts for it then, Skeet was AWOL. > he's not been holding his end up much around here lately anyway
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 22:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nuq7xu.m4zmx1155n8uoN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #701411 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> i got noted > >>>>> > >>>>> Were you recorded also? > >>>>> > >>>> nope , just noted > >>> > >>> Who is the offishul noter and recorder these fine days? > >>> > >> skeeter still as far as i know > > > > That accounts for it then, Skeet was AWOL. > > > he's not been holding his end up much around here lately anyway Prolly s-t-o-n-e-d again... -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 14:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bioqjm.q5q.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #701414 |
On 2018-09-06 2:04 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> i got noted >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Were you recorded also? >>>>>>> >>>>>> nope , just noted >>>>> >>>>> Who is the offishul noter and recorder these fine days? >>>>> >>>> skeeter still as far as i know >>> >>> That accounts for it then, Skeet was AWOL. >>> >> he's not been holding his end up much around here lately anyway > > Prolly s-t-o-n-e-d again... > oh that skeeter , he'll never learn , that's why he sees ufo's
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 22:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nuq92e.vrs9qk31r80dN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #701415 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> i got noted > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Were you recorded also? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> nope , just noted > >>>>> > >>>>> Who is the offishul noter and recorder these fine days? > >>>>> > >>>> skeeter still as far as i know > >>> > >>> That accounts for it then, Skeet was AWOL. > >>> > >> he's not been holding his end up much around here lately anyway > > > > Prolly s-t-o-n-e-d again... > > > oh that skeeter , he'll never learn , > that's why he sees ufo's I thought that was because this place is full of little green men with TV antennas on their heads. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 14:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bios88.fbr.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #701419 |
On 2018-09-06 2:32 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> i got noted >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Were you recorded also? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> nope , just noted >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who is the offishul noter and recorder these fine days? >>>>>>> >>>>>> skeeter still as far as i know >>>>> >>>>> That accounts for it then, Skeet was AWOL. >>>>> >>>> he's not been holding his end up much around here lately anyway >>> >>> Prolly s-t-o-n-e-d again... >>> >> oh that skeeter , he'll never learn , >> that's why he sees ufo's > > I thought that was because this place is full of > little green men with TV antennas on their heads. > now you're going to get everyone jacked up just in time for you to go
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 22:41 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nuq9ly.1ji9v1r1nyrzyhN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #701420 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> i got noted > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Were you recorded also? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> nope , just noted > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Who is the offishul noter and recorder these fine days? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> skeeter still as far as i know > >>>>> > >>>>> That accounts for it then, Skeet was AWOL. > >>>>> > >>>> he's not been holding his end up much around here lately anyway > >>> > >>> Prolly s-t-o-n-e-d again... > >>> > >> oh that skeeter , he'll never learn , > >> that's why he sees ufo's > > > > I thought that was because this place is full of > > little green men with TV antennas on their heads. > > > now you're going to get everyone jacked up just in time for you to go I'm not going to hang about here with a bunch of aliens, one of them has started fantasizing about nasty thrashings. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 14:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <biosig.fbr.17.8@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #701422 |
On 2018-09-06 2:41 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> i got noted >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Were you recorded also? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> nope , just noted >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who is the offishul noter and recorder these fine days? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> skeeter still as far as i know >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That accounts for it then, Skeet was AWOL. >>>>>>> >>>>>> he's not been holding his end up much around here lately anyway >>>>> >>>>> Prolly s-t-o-n-e-d again... >>>>> >>>> oh that skeeter , he'll never learn , >>>> that's why he sees ufo's >>> >>> I thought that was because this place is full of >>> little green men with TV antennas on their heads. >>> >> now you're going to get everyone jacked up just in time for you to go > > I'm not going to hang about here with a bunch of aliens, > one of them has started fantasizing about nasty thrashings. > just one
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 21:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pms61r$2cc$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #701414 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 22:04:16 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>>>> i got noted >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Were you recorded also? >> >>>>> >> >>>> nope , just noted >> >>> >> >>> Who is the offishul noter and recorder these fine days? >> >>> >> >> skeeter still as far as i know >> > >> > That accounts for it then, Skeet was AWOL. >> > >> he's not been holding his end up much around here lately anyway > > Prolly s-t-o-n-e-d again... He's been sulking and not posting much ever since kensi gave him (and his now-apparently-retired-at-last "Tommy" sock) a nasty thrashing a week or so ago. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 22:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nuq9hq.i2nftg10alzj5N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #701418 |
Paul Derbyshire in his bigoted Nazedga costume pompously postulated: > a nasty thrashing Fuck off, Paul. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just flipped the bird.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-07 01:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pmslfk$g6r$2@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #701399 |
On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 21:16:55 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-09-06 12:44 PM, Sn!pe wrote: >> > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On 2018-09-06 12:35 PM, Catalina wrote: >> > [...] >> >>> I heard about that when it happened. MN only watches fake news. >> >>> >> >> i got noted >> > >> > Were you recorded also? >> > >> nope , just noted > > Who is the offishul noter and recorder these fine days? I am. -- Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 13:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pms2bo$363$2@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #701395 |
x-no-archive: yes On 9/6/2018 12:44 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-09-06 12:35 PM, Catalina wrote: > [...] >>> I heard about that when it happened. MN only watches fake news. >>> >> i got noted > > Were you recorded also? At least someone knows the proper procedures around here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 16:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pms39d$gbm$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #701264 |
On 9/5/2018 7:12 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pmphl0$d3i$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... > > >> >> On 9/5/2018 4:42 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pmpece$831$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 9/5/2018 4:25 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <if1uod55c6sk42983rlqmg1b8lm1aeqrb4@4ax.com>, >>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:02:29 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> As <...> Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke >>>>>>> toured California's largest wildfire on record, >>>>>>> he proclaimed that fires have ?nothing to do >>>>>>> with climate change.? >>>>>> >>>>>> He's correct because it has been proven that >>>>>> it's tree hugger liberal policies that resulted in >>>>>> legislation that prohibits tree trimming and >>>>>> removal that is the actual cause. >>>>>> >>>>>> It requires all sorts of permits which are almost >>>>>> impossible to obtain to even be able to trim trees >>>>>> and brush back from a residence so it doesn't >>>>>> go up in flames in the event of a forest fire. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, there is a stupid liberal prohibition against >>>>>> even removing deadwood and brush on public >>>>>> lands which further reduces the chances of >>>>>> extinguishing or controlling the spread of forest >>>>>> fires. >>>>>> >>>>>> Again, it's a case of you ignorant, feel good, >>>>>> libtard tree-huggers doing more harm to the >>>>>> forests than good and then attempting to >>>>>> blame it on somebody or something else. >>>>>> >>>>>> FAIL! Chickens coming home to roost. >>>>>> >>>>>> <guffaws> >>>>> >>>>> It turns out that many, if not most, of the California fires were set by >>>>> arsonists. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, they can't prosecute PG&E for lighting fires with broke >>>> power lines so they just have to go with unspecified arson. >>> >>> Nice spin and denial, but I read about one case where they arrested a guy >>> who had made threats a week before the fire started, and all of his >>> neighbor's homes were burned, saving his. If you want to blame all those >>> fires on power companies, it's not a global warming issue. >> >> I went looking for arson arrests. Looks like there might be two real >> ones. Some of the arrests seem to be based on very little actual >> evidence beyond "seen in the area". >> >> On the other hand, there's this: >> >> <https://calfire.ca.gov/communications/downloads/newsreleases/2018/2017_WildfireSiege_Cause.pdf> >> >> It the vegetation wasn't crispy dry from drought, it's quite likely that >> the fire wouldn't spread. It was just a couple of years ago on a >> severely windy night that a powerline got to arcing to a spruce tree a >> few houses down. The lights were a-flickering, even. So, after a >> while, a fire truck showed up, and then an electric company truck showed >> up and me and the neighbors all went out to watch. Then they snipped the >> branches away and everything was OK and there was no forest fire. > > Search "Holy Jim Fire" and then at least one of the Northern California > fires that eventually all merged together. Yeah. Those are the two that look like real arson. I'm thinking that MS-13 and antifas aren't being paid by the Soros/Clinton Foundation to light fires. They're more into busting windows, punching nazis and chopping heads off from what I've been able to gather. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-05 17:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pmpl82$i8m$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #701244 |
On 9/5/2018 3:30 PM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 9/5/2018 4:25 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <if1uod55c6sk42983rlqmg1b8lm1aeqrb4@4ax.com>, >> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >> >>> >>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:02:29 -0400, kensi >>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> As <...> Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke >>>> toured California's largest wildfire on record, >>>> he proclaimed that fires have ?nothing to do >>>> with climate change.? >>> >>> He's correct because it has been proven that >>> it's tree hugger liberal policies that resulted in >>> legislation that prohibits tree trimming and >>> removal that is the actual cause. >>> >>> It requires all sorts of permits which are almost >>> impossible to obtain to even be able to trim trees >>> and brush back from a residence so it doesn't >>> go up in flames in the event of a forest fire. >>> >>> Also, there is a stupid liberal prohibition against >>> even removing deadwood and brush on public >>> lands which further reduces the chances of >>> extinguishing or controlling the spread of forest >>> fires. >>> >>> Again, it's a case of you ignorant, feel good, >>> libtard tree-huggers doing more harm to the >>> forests than good and then attempting to >>> blame it on somebody or something else. >>> >>> FAIL! Chickens coming home to roost. >>> >>> <guffaws> >> >> It turns out that many, if not most, of the California fires were set by >> arsonists. > > Unfortunately, they can't prosecute PG&E for lighting fires with broke > power lines so they just have to go with unspecified arson. > they prosecuted a power company in Texas on that Bastrop fire, they had not kept the trees cut back from the power line.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-05 20:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <r8r56f-65c.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #701242 |
In sci.physics Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <if1uod55c6sk42983rlqmg1b8lm1aeqrb4@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > >> >> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:02:29 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >> >As <...> Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke >> >toured California's largest wildfire on record, >> >he proclaimed that fires have ?nothing to do >> >with climate change.? >> >> He's correct because it has been proven that >> it's tree hugger liberal policies that resulted in >> legislation that prohibits tree trimming and >> removal that is the actual cause. >> >> It requires all sorts of permits which are almost >> impossible to obtain to even be able to trim trees >> and brush back from a residence so it doesn't >> go up in flames in the event of a forest fire. >> >> Also, there is a stupid liberal prohibition against >> even removing deadwood and brush on public >> lands which further reduces the chances of >> extinguishing or controlling the spread of forest >> fires. >> >> Again, it's a case of you ignorant, feel good, >> libtard tree-huggers doing more harm to the >> forests than good and then attempting to >> blame it on somebody or something else. >> >> FAIL! Chickens coming home to roost. >> >> <guffaws> > > It turns out that many, if not most, of the California fires were set by > arsonists. Which then became wildfires because of all the accumulated fuel. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-05 21:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pmphej$u69$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #701235 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 14:36:03 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:02:29 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>As <...> Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke toured California's largest >>wildfire on record, >>he proclaimed that fires have “nothing to do with climate change.” > > He's correct because it has been proven that it's tree hugger liberal > policies that resulted in legislation that prohibits tree trimming and > removal that is the actual cause. > > It requires all sorts of permits which are almost impossible to obtain > to even be able to trim trees and brush back from a residence so it > doesn't go up in flames in the event of a forest fire. > > Also, there is a stupid liberal prohibition against even removing > deadwood and brush on public lands which further reduces the chances of > extinguishing or controlling the spread of forest fires. > > Again, it's a case of you ignorant, feel good, > libtard tree-huggers doing more harm to the forests than good and then > attempting to blame it on somebody or something else. > > FA<SMACKAKOOK!> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216070/ ---------- These results suggest that management of fuels provided minimal reductions in risk to assets ---------- Nope, it's not accumulating deadwood that is the main risk factor. https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/08/30/we-cant-log-our-way-to-fewer- forest-fires/ https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/05/24/myths-about-wildfires-logging-and- forests/ https://www.counterpunch.org/2012/07/03/wildfires-myths-and-realities/ https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/09/18/logging-wont-stop-wildfires/ https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/10/13/why-california-is-burning/ https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/06/27/the-causes-of-forest-fires-climate- vs-logging/ https://www.counterpunch.org/2007/11/29/forest-fires-lies-and-chainsaws/ The big factor is climate change creating longer spells of hot, dry conditions favorable for fires to start and spread. SPNAK! -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-05 16:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35fa02582d81ece4994862@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #701251 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pmphej$u69$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 14:36:03 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > > > On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:02:29 -0400, kensi > > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > > > >>As <...> Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke toured California's largest > >>wildfire on record, > >>he proclaimed that fires have ?nothing to do with climate change.? > > > > He's correct because it has been proven that it's tree hugger liberal > > policies that resulted in legislation that prohibits tree trimming and > > removal that is the actual cause. > > > > It requires all sorts of permits which are almost impossible to obtain > > to even be able to trim trees and brush back from a residence so it > > doesn't go up in flames in the event of a forest fire. > > > > Also, there is a stupid liberal prohibition against even removing > > deadwood and brush on public lands which further reduces the chances of > > extinguishing or controlling the spread of forest fires. > > > > Again, it's a case of you ignorant, feel good, > > libtard tree-huggers doing more harm to the forests than good and then > > attempting to blame it on somebody or something else. > > > > FA<SMACKAKOOK!> > > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216070/ > > ---------- > These results suggest that management of fuels provided minimal reductions > in risk to assets > ---------- > > Nope, it's not accumulating deadwood that is the main risk factor. > > https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/08/30/we-cant-log-our-way-to-fewer- > forest-fires/ > > https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/05/24/myths-about-wildfires-logging-and- > forests/ > > https://www.counterpunch.org/2012/07/03/wildfires-myths-and-realities/ > > https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/09/18/logging-wont-stop-wildfires/ > > https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/10/13/why-california-is-burning/ > > https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/06/27/the-causes-of-forest-fires-climate- > vs-logging/ > > https://www.counterpunch.org/2007/11/29/forest-fires-lies-and-chainsaws/ > > The big factor is climate change creating longer spells of hot, dry > conditions favorable for fires to start and spread. > > SPNAK! Droughts have been common throughout recorded history. Remember the dust bowl? Yes, I know that plowing was also a factor. It's not uncommon for a drought to last a decade or two. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-05 21:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pmq3tt$14sh$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #701263 |
On 9/5/2018 6:10 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pmphej$u69$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 14:36:03 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:02:29 -0400, kensi >>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> As <...> Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke toured California's largest >>>> wildfire on record, >>>> he proclaimed that fires have ?nothing to do with climate change.? >>> >>> He's correct because it has been proven that it's tree hugger liberal >>> policies that resulted in legislation that prohibits tree trimming and >>> removal that is the actual cause. >>> >>> It requires all sorts of permits which are almost impossible to obtain >>> to even be able to trim trees and brush back from a residence so it >>> doesn't go up in flames in the event of a forest fire. >>> >>> Also, there is a stupid liberal prohibition against even removing >>> deadwood and brush on public lands which further reduces the chances of >>> extinguishing or controlling the spread of forest fires. >>> >>> Again, it's a case of you ignorant, feel good, >>> libtard tree-huggers doing more harm to the forests than good and then >>> attempting to blame it on somebody or something else. >>> >>> FA<SMACKAKOOK!> >> >> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216070/ >> >> ---------- >> These results suggest that management of fuels provided minimal reductions >> in risk to assets >> ---------- >> >> Nope, it's not accumulating deadwood that is the main risk factor. >> >> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/08/30/we-cant-log-our-way-to-fewer- >> forest-fires/ >> >> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/05/24/myths-about-wildfires-logging-and- >> forests/ >> >> https://www.counterpunch.org/2012/07/03/wildfires-myths-and-realities/ >> >> https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/09/18/logging-wont-stop-wildfires/ >> >> https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/10/13/why-california-is-burning/ >> >> https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/06/27/the-causes-of-forest-fires-climate- >> vs-logging/ >> >> https://www.counterpunch.org/2007/11/29/forest-fires-lies-and-chainsaws/ >> >> The big factor is climate change creating longer spells of hot, dry >> conditions favorable for fires to start and spread. >> >> SPNAK! > > Droughts have been common throughout recorded history. Remember the dust > bowl? Yes, I know that plowing was also a factor. It's not uncommon for > a drought to last a decade or two. > kaliforniaites stay plowed. why all the links from silly 'counterpunch' ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 03:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pmq5q0$lt9$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #701296 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 21:37:45 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 9/5/2018 6:10 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pmphej$u69$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 14:36:03 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:02:29 -0400, kensi >>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> As <...> Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke toured California's largest >>>>> wildfire on record, >>>>> he proclaimed that fires have ?nothing to do with climate change.? >>>> >>>> He's correct because it has been proven that it's tree hugger liberal >>>> policies that resulted in legislation that prohibits tree trimming >>>> and removal that is the actual cause. >>>> >>>> It requires all sorts of permits which are almost impossible to >>>> obtain to even be able to trim trees and brush back from a residence >>>> so it doesn't go up in flames in the event of a forest fire. >>>> >>>> Also, there is a stupid liberal prohibition against even removing >>>> deadwood and brush on public lands which further reduces the chances >>>> of extinguishing or controlling the spread of forest fires. >>>> >>>> Again, it's a case of you ignorant, feel good, >>>> libtard tree-huggers doing more harm to the forests than good and >>>> then attempting to blame it on somebody or something else. >>>> >>>> FA<SMACKAKOOK!> >>> >>> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216070/ >>> >>> ---------- >>> These results suggest that management of fuels provided minimal >>> reductions in risk to assets ---------- >>> >>> Nope, it's not accumulating deadwood that is the main risk factor. >>> >>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/08/30/we-cant-log-our-way-to-fewer- >>> forest-fires/ >>> >>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/05/24/myths-about-wildfires-logging- and- >>> forests/ >>> >>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2012/07/03/wildfires-myths-and-realities/ >>> >>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/09/18/logging-wont-stop-wildfires/ >>> >>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/10/13/why-california-is-burning/ >>> >>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/06/27/the-causes-of-forest-fires- climate- >>> vs-logging/ >>> >>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2007/11/29/forest-fires-lies-and- chainsaws/ >>> >>> The big factor is climate change creating longer spells of hot, dry >>> conditions favorable for fires to start and spread. >>> >>> SPNAK! >> >> Droughts have been common throughout recorded history. Remember the >> dust bowl? Yes, I know that plowing was also a factor. It's not >> uncommon for a drought to last a decade or two. >> >> > kaliforniaites stay plowed. > > why all the links from silly 'counterpunch' ? What did Counterpunch do to inspire such butthurt in you? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-06 10:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pmreci$19ub$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #701301 |
On 9/5/2018 11:09 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 21:37:45 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 9/5/2018 6:10 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pmphej$u69$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 14:36:03 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:02:29 -0400, kensi >>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> As <...> Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke toured California's largest >>>>>> wildfire on record, >>>>>> he proclaimed that fires have ?nothing to do with climate change.? >>>>> >>>>> He's correct because it has been proven that it's tree hugger liberal >>>>> policies that resulted in legislation that prohibits tree trimming >>>>> and removal that is the actual cause. >>>>> >>>>> It requires all sorts of permits which are almost impossible to >>>>> obtain to even be able to trim trees and brush back from a residence >>>>> so it doesn't go up in flames in the event of a forest fire. >>>>> >>>>> Also, there is a stupid liberal prohibition against even removing >>>>> deadwood and brush on public lands which further reduces the chances >>>>> of extinguishing or controlling the spread of forest fires. >>>>> >>>>> Again, it's a case of you ignorant, feel good, >>>>> libtard tree-huggers doing more harm to the forests than good and >>>>> then attempting to blame it on somebody or something else. >>>>> >>>>> FA<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>> >>>> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216070/ >>>> >>>> ---------- >>>> These results suggest that management of fuels provided minimal >>>> reductions in risk to assets ---------- >>>> >>>> Nope, it's not accumulating deadwood that is the main risk factor. >>>> >>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/08/30/we-cant-log-our-way-to-fewer- >>>> forest-fires/ >>>> >>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/05/24/myths-about-wildfires-logging- > and- >>>> forests/ >>>> >>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2012/07/03/wildfires-myths-and-realities/ >>>> >>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/09/18/logging-wont-stop-wildfires/ >>>> >>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/10/13/why-california-is-burning/ >>>> >>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/06/27/the-causes-of-forest-fires- > climate- >>>> vs-logging/ >>>> >>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2007/11/29/forest-fires-lies-and- > chainsaws/ >>>> >>>> The big factor is climate change creating longer spells of hot, dry >>>> conditions favorable for fires to start and spread. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>> >>> Droughts have been common throughout recorded history. Remember the >>> dust bowl? Yes, I know that plowing was also a factor. It's not >>> uncommon for a drought to last a decade or two. >>> >>> >> kaliforniaites stay plowed. >> >> why all the links from silly 'counterpunch' ? > > What did Counterpunch do to inspire such butthurt in you? > Dishonest, journalist "science", propaganda and fake news. Same as your posts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web