Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #523890 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-29 22:45 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-10-02 18:19 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 90 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 22:45 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 05:13 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-09-30 08:40 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 09:14 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:37 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 14:59 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 19:17 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:46 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 06:59 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-01 00:44 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 05:32 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 04:46 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 09:04 -0700
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:34 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 15:03 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-30 14:40 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 20:44 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 19:32 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-30 16:11 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 19:08 -0700
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 08:59 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 17:39 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-30 15:06 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-30 19:33 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 17:33 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 22:59 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-01 22:10 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-02 04:08 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 04:05 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-02 08:44 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-02 18:18 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 11:36 -0700
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 15:21 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-02 19:38 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-02 21:40 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-03 03:53 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-03 00:27 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-03 06:11 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-03 11:38 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-03 17:17 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 15:43 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-03 15:24 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-03 20:22 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-03 17:17 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:48 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 21:02 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 01:04 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 04:07 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 10:38 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 09:54 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 12:23 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 12:06 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 16:27 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 12:11 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 15:10 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:57 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 15:48 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 17:17 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 18:35 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-05 19:46 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-05 23:53 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-05 20:12 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-06 01:21 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-06 02:30 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-06 16:30 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-07 16:56 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-08 04:25 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 15:28 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-08 18:01 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-08 18:05 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-08 23:22 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-09 13:28 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-09 09:25 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 17:42 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-03 01:11 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-03 10:44 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-03 17:27 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-04 11:40 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-04 12:22 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-04 17:18 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-04 19:00 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-04 23:20 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 18:50 -0500
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 06:19 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-03 17:29 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 15:56 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-03 20:33 +0000
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-03 18:37 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-02 09:10 -0400
Re: Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-02 18:19 +0000
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-29 22:45 -0400 |
| Subject | Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! |
| Message-ID | <mufi95$stp$1@dont-email.me> |
Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXA-enq65ng
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 05:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tj7sdc-i6n.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #523890 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 08:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <jcln0bd2l6821b12rofhj6jbjgjo3pn30n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523913 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! > >He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by hijackers. You claim to know something about aviation, jimp. This pilot says the jet that supposedly hit the Pentagon was incapable of performing the aerial maneuvers required for the claimed approach path. Do you disagree? If so, why? This video was posted in another thread, and has not been met with any serious rebuttal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57kdlbdYILM 9/11 Myths Exposed By Firefighters, Architects & Engineers Note: calling someone a kooktard doesn't qualify as serious rebuttal. The arguments made by two lucid, experienced professionals that three WTC buildings were brought down by intentional, pre-planned, controlled demolition cannot be dismissed with scoffing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 09:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mugn3u$iid$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523926 |
Wally W. wrote: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! >> >> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. > > The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and > understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by > hijackers. And of course Jimp just made up his mind, then posts comments without even examining the evidence. The 'official 9/11 fairytalers" have a pattern they never vary from. # 1 Stick head in ground # 2 Come up for air and scream at everyone else who doesn't have their head in the ground # 3 Repeat You have Jimp who claims to be a pilot but offers no proof, other than his ability to insult others and post on the internet day after day. And on the other side a group called Pilots for 9/11 truth, who have a website and surely would have needed valid credentials to join. http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ ....Who has more credibility ???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 17:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <r7jtdc-mur.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #523929 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > Wally W. wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! >>> >>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. >> >> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and >> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by >> hijackers. > > > > And of course Jimp just made up his mind, then posts comments without even > examining the evidence. The youtube video was the usual nonsense of youtube videos. Try this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KNbKFMBsQE <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 14:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muhb9u$a4n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523967 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Wally W. wrote: >>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! >>>> >>>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. >>> >>> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and >>> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by >>> hijackers. >> >> >> >> And of course Jimp just made up his mind, then posts comments without >> even examining the evidence. > > The youtube video was the usual nonsense of youtube videos. > > Try this: > <Questionable link deleted> Nope I'm not going to waste my time with your links when you will not tell us what it is about.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 19:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d3ptdc-9is.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #523975 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Wally W. wrote: >>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! >>>>> >>>>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. >>>> >>>> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and >>>> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by >>>> hijackers. >>> >>> >>> >>> And of course Jimp just made up his mind, then posts comments without >>> even examining the evidence. >> >> The youtube video was the usual nonsense of youtube videos. >> >> Try this: >> > > <Questionable link deleted> > > > > Nope I'm not going to waste my time with your links when you will not tell > us what it is about. Shows an airliner doing a maneuver declared impossible by kooks like you. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 04:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <180q0b15u8pstlru5b812dq7a9vk50utam@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523975 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:59:08 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> Wally W. wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out!
>>>>>
>>>>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly.
>>>>
>>>> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and
>>>> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by
>>>> hijackers.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And of course Jimp just made up his mind, then posts comments without
>>> even examining the evidence.
>>
>> The youtube video was the usual nonsense of youtube videos.
>>
>> Try this:
>>
>
><Questionable link deleted>
>
Coward.
>
>Nope I'm not going to waste my time with your links when you will not tell
>us what it is about.
Coward.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 06:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muj3hi$25g$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #524081 |
K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:59:08 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> > wrote: > >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> Wally W. wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! >>>>>> >>>>>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. >>>>> >>>>> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and >>>>> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons >>>>> by hijackers. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> And of course Jimp just made up his mind, then posts comments >>>> without even examining the evidence. >>> >>> The youtube video was the usual nonsense of youtube videos. >>> >>> Try this: >>> >> >> <Questionable link deleted> >> > > Coward. > >> >> Nope I'm not going to waste my time with your links when you will not >> tell us what it is about. > > Coward.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 00:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <36ep0b5f60803pofd8o4g6q0lvau6rh9ev@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523967 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:37:31 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Wally W. wrote: >>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! >>>> >>>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. >>> >>> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and >>> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by >>> hijackers. >> >> >> >> And of course Jimp just made up his mind, then posts comments without even >> examining the evidence. > >The youtube video was the usual nonsense of youtube videos. > >Try this: > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KNbKFMBsQE A 1-g manuever at an unstated speed in a 707, not a 757.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 05:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k4tudc-1v2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #524063 |
In sci.physics Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:37:31 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Wally W. wrote: >>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! >>>>> >>>>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. >>>> >>>> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and >>>> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by >>>> hijackers. >>> >>> >>> >>> And of course Jimp just made up his mind, then posts comments without even >>> examining the evidence. >> >>The youtube video was the usual nonsense of youtube videos. >> >>Try this: >> >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KNbKFMBsQE > > A 1-g manuever at an unstated speed in a 707, not a 757. The point being that airliners are capapble of many maneuvers that they do not normally do to avoid scaring passengers and they do not fall apart doing them. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-01 04:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <l70q0blgfcgl78v1u3uh2bdgf4cppuuqjo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #523967 |
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:37:31 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Wally W. wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out!
>>>>
>>>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly.
>>>
>>> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and
>>> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by
>>> hijackers.
>>
>>
>>
>> And of course Jimp just made up his mind, then posts comments without even
>> examining the evidence.
>
>The youtube video was the usual nonsense of youtube videos.
>
>Try this:
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KNbKFMBsQE
>
><snip remaining kook babble>
It will be fun to read how Bast gets around that.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-05 09:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <73902b73-78c6-481a-9518-60ccd38b78b6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #523929 |
So Blast is questioning whether JimP is a pilot but yet it was Blast who used to claim that his sister died in the terror attacks on 9/11. Note that Blast had since dropped that false claim.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 17:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p1jtdc-mur.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #523926 |
In sci.physics Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! >> >>He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. > > The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and > understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by > hijackers. > > You claim to know something about aviation, jimp. This pilot says the > jet that supposedly hit the Pentagon was incapable of performing the > aerial maneuvers required for the claimed approach path. Do you > disagree? If so, why? There is no indication that the guy is actually a pilot or that he is not just another kook. Airliners do not make aggresive maneuvers; that is they make very shallow turns, banks, climbs and decents. They do that not because the airplanes are incapable, they do that because abrupt and agressive maneuvers would scare the holy hell out of most passengers and no one would fly on that airline again. It is quite possible for most all airliners to do things like a barrel roll or chandelles and doing such would NOT cause any structural damage. It was noted that ATC controllers at first thought the airliners where military because they were maneuvering in a manner inconsistant with normal, sedate airline operations. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 15:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <muhbhf$bb0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #523966 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! >>> >>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. >> >> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and >> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by >> hijackers. >> >> You claim to know something about aviation, jimp. This pilot says the >> jet that supposedly hit the Pentagon was incapable of performing the >> aerial maneuvers required for the claimed approach path. Do you >> disagree? If so, why? > > There is no indication that the guy is actually a pilot or that he > is not just another kook. > > Airliners do not make aggresive maneuvers; that is they make very > shallow turns, banks, climbs and decents. > > They do that not because the airplanes are incapable, they do that > because abrupt and agressive maneuvers would scare the holy hell > out of most passengers and no one would fly on that airline again. > > It is quite possible for most all airliners to do things like a barrel > roll or chandelles and doing such would NOT cause any structural damage. > > It was noted that ATC controllers at first thought the airliners > where military because they were maneuvering in a manner inconsistant > with normal, sedate airline operations. Is there a point to your dis-jointed rambling ???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 14:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0e6dnWe3LtJUp5HLnZ2dnUU7-YHOydjZ@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #523977 |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:muhbhf$bb0$1@dont-email.me... > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! >>>> >>>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. >>> >>> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and >>> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by >>> hijackers. >>> >>> You claim to know something about aviation, jimp. This pilot says the >>> jet that supposedly hit the Pentagon was incapable of performing the >>> aerial maneuvers required for the claimed approach path. Do you >>> disagree? If so, why? >> >> There is no indication that the guy is actually a pilot or that he >> is not just another kook. >> >> Airliners do not make aggresive maneuvers; that is they make very >> shallow turns, banks, climbs and decents. >> >> They do that not because the airplanes are incapable, they do that >> because abrupt and agressive maneuvers would scare the holy hell >> out of most passengers and no one would fly on that airline again. >> >> It is quite possible for most all airliners to do things like a barrel >> roll or chandelles and doing such would NOT cause any structural damage. >> >> It was noted that ATC controllers at first thought the airliners >> where military because they were maneuvering in a manner inconsistant >> with normal, sedate airline operations. > > > > > > > > Is there a point to your dis-jointed rambling ??? jimp is hilarious because it doesn't matter what an alleged 757 is capable of when the pilot that was supposed to be in the cockpit of Fake 77 wasn't even allowed to fly a Cessna because he was so bad. The original Pentagon BS had a very experienced pilot in the cockpit of Fake 77 but when he showed up alive the 9/11 Hoaxsters had to use a bad pilot instead. Plus jimp has yet to explain why some Pentagon fairytales say Fake 77 did a 360 degree spiral dive before it flew into the Pentagon and others say it did a 270 degree spiral dive after it flew over the Pentagon. Either way if that turn had happened in real life someone should have seen it other than people looking at bogus blips on the radar where those bogus blips were part of one of the many games that the military was playing on 9/11/01. More on the BS at the Pentagon with Jesse Ventura: conspiracy theory with jesse ventura s02e08 pentagon dsr https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhtqJ21W350 And even though I didn't post the OP I still think it should be mentioned again. *********** OP ********** Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXA-enq65ng
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 20:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <76utdc-p2t.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #523985 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > jimp is hilarious because it doesn't matter what an alleged 757 is capable > of when the pilot that was supposed to be in the cockpit of Fake 77 wasn't > even allowed to fly a Cessna because he was so bad. Raving kook babble. <snip remaining insane, raving kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 19:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <guptdc-sls.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #523977 |
In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! >>>> >>>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. >>> >>> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and >>> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by >>> hijackers. >>> >>> You claim to know something about aviation, jimp. This pilot says the >>> jet that supposedly hit the Pentagon was incapable of performing the >>> aerial maneuvers required for the claimed approach path. Do you >>> disagree? If so, why? >> >> There is no indication that the guy is actually a pilot or that he >> is not just another kook. >> >> Airliners do not make aggresive maneuvers; that is they make very >> shallow turns, banks, climbs and decents. >> >> They do that not because the airplanes are incapable, they do that >> because abrupt and agressive maneuvers would scare the holy hell >> out of most passengers and no one would fly on that airline again. >> >> It is quite possible for most all airliners to do things like a barrel >> roll or chandelles and doing such would NOT cause any structural damage. >> >> It was noted that ATC controllers at first thought the airliners >> where military because they were maneuvering in a manner inconsistant >> with normal, sedate airline operations. > > > Is there a point to your dis-jointed rambling ??? Not other than all you 9/11 kooks are stark raving lunatics. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 16:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30760c01ea27599f98c2fb@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #523977 |
In article <muhbhf$bb0$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > In sci.physics Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:13:01 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> > >>> In sci.physics Bast <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote: > >>>> Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed on 9/11 Speaks Out! > >>> > >>> He's pissed the virgins weren't and they were all ugly. > >> > >> The title was misleading. It is about a pilot who has flown and > >> understands the limitations of the jets supposedly used as weapons by > >> hijackers. > >> > >> You claim to know something about aviation, jimp. This pilot says the > >> jet that supposedly hit the Pentagon was incapable of performing the > >> aerial maneuvers required for the claimed approach path. Do you > >> disagree? If so, why? > > > > There is no indication that the guy is actually a pilot or that he > > is not just another kook. > > > > Airliners do not make aggresive maneuvers; that is they make very > > shallow turns, banks, climbs and decents. > > > > They do that not because the airplanes are incapable, they do that > > because abrupt and agressive maneuvers would scare the holy hell > > out of most passengers and no one would fly on that airline again. > > > > It is quite possible for most all airliners to do things like a barrel > > roll or chandelles and doing such would NOT cause any structural damage. > > > > It was noted that ATC controllers at first thought the airliners > > where military because they were maneuvering in a manner inconsistant > > with normal, sedate airline operations. > > > > > > > > Is there a point to your dis-jointed rambling ??? Makes perfect sense, if you're sane. Must be why you call it "dis- jointed rambling". You're a raving loon. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-30 19:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <79e1eac1-0f9c-467b-b42f-59e67ff8caaa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #523966 |
roger that, jimp-oner-ine; will you, please, do a 1080 (degrees, I think > It is quite possible for most all airliners to do things like a barrel roll > or chandelles and doing such would NOT cause any structural damage. > > It was noted that ATC controllers at first thought the airliners > where military because they were maneuvering in a manner inconsistant > with normal, sedate airline operations. > > > > -- > Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 5 [1] 2 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web