Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #533932 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-18 08:58 -0600 |
| Last post | 2015-11-21 23:15 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 41 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 08:58 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-18 13:29 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 15:53 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-18 15:32 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-18 20:01 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-18 23:38 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 09:46 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 09:20 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-19 14:24 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 16:37 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-19 15:13 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 18:42 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 18:45 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-19 20:09 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 09:35 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-20 10:46 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 13:21 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 14:11 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-20 15:20 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 17:37 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-22 14:35 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 18:22 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-20 22:06 +0000
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 17:09 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-21 00:35 +0000
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 21:12 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-21 07:16 +0000
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 08:07 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-21 19:32 +0000
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 15:16 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-21 22:45 +0000
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 16:50 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-21 23:34 +0000
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 07:57 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 19:42 +0000
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 16:22 -0600
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 23:17 +0000
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 07:10 +0100
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 16:36 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 23:03 -0800
Re: Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 23:15 -0800
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 14:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5e215ecc-f0ee-4892-969b-216f56d64cfc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #534291 |
On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 3:37:46 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 11/20/15 5:20 PM, Double-A wrote: > > Virtual cosmic rays are the real danger of nearly c space travel. > > > > Double-A > > > > Cosmic rays are real--not virtual. > > > From Wikipedia -- Cosmic Rays > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray > > Cosmic rays are immensely high-energy radiation, mainly > originating outside the Solar System. They may produce > showers of secondary particles that penetrate and impact the > Earth's atmosphere and sometimes even reach the surface. > Composed primarily of high-energy protons and atomic nuclei, > they are of mysterious origin. Data from the Fermi space > telescope (2013) has been interpreted as evidence that a > significant fraction of primary cosmic rays originate from > the supernovae of massive stars. However, this is not > thought to be their only source. Active galactic nuclei > probably also produce cosmic rays. > > > Track Cosmic Rays with Smartphone App > > http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/track-cosmic-rays-with-smartphone-app/ > > Observing Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays with Smartphones > http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.2895 > > Cosmic ray particle shower? There's an app for that. > > http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/10/cosmic-ray-particle-shower-theres-an-app-for-that/ > > Every second, the Earth is being struck by cosmic rays, high > energy particles that slam into the atmosphere. > Understanding where they come from and how they're generated > could provide information about some of the most energetic > processes in the Universe. But Earth's atmosphere protects > us from them, ensuring that they don't make it to the > surface. Instead, we have to look for the shower of photons > and particles that the cosmic rays create when they hit the > atmosphere. > > Even large detectors, however, only capture a few traces of > the high energy particles that reach the Earth, meaning that > careful studies of their origin can take years, possibly > even decades. So some researchers decided it might be > possible to take advantage of a large population of > non-specialized detectors that are pre-positioned all over > the world: cell phone cameras. > > The researchers from the University of California have > drafted a paper in which they describe testing whether a > smartphone camera can detect high energy photons and > particles of the sort produced by cosmic rays. Testing with > radioactive isotopes of radium, cobalt, and cesium showed > that the detector easily picked up gamma rays (and you > didn't even have to point the phones at the source!). They > also put a phone inside a lead box and showed that they > could detect high energy particles. Finally, they took a > phone up on a commercial flight and were able to obtain a > particle track across the detector. Sam, you didn't need to make such a lengthy reply. In the hypothetical situation where a spaceship is traveling close to c, collision with atoms in space are sometimes referred to as "virtual cosmic rays", because at the speed the ship would be traveling, the speed of those atoms relative to the ship would pack the same energy as real cosmic rays observed here on Earth. Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 18:22 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <X8mdnfC8LZjHwc_LnZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #534620 |
On 11/22/15 4:35 PM, Double-A wrote: > On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 3:37:46 PM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: >> On 11/20/15 5:20 PM, Double-A wrote: >>> Virtual cosmic rays are the real danger of nearly c space travel. >>> >>> Double-A >>> >> >> Cosmic rays are real--not virtual. >> >> >> From Wikipedia -- Cosmic Rays >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray >> >> Cosmic rays are immensely high-energy radiation, mainly >> originating outside the Solar System. They may produce >> showers of secondary particles that penetrate and impact the >> Earth's atmosphere and sometimes even reach the surface. >> Composed primarily of high-energy protons and atomic nuclei, >> they are of mysterious origin. Data from the Fermi space >> telescope (2013) has been interpreted as evidence that a >> significant fraction of primary cosmic rays originate from >> the supernovae of massive stars. However, this is not >> thought to be their only source. Active galactic nuclei >> probably also produce cosmic rays. >> >> >> Track Cosmic Rays with Smartphone App >> >> http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/track-cosmic-rays-with-smartphone-app/ >> >> Observing Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays with Smartphones >> http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.2895 >> >> Cosmic ray particle shower? There's an app for that. >> >> http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/10/cosmic-ray-particle-shower-theres-an-app-for-that/ >> >> Every second, the Earth is being struck by cosmic rays, high >> energy particles that slam into the atmosphere. >> Understanding where they come from and how they're generated >> could provide information about some of the most energetic >> processes in the Universe. But Earth's atmosphere protects >> us from them, ensuring that they don't make it to the >> surface. Instead, we have to look for the shower of photons >> and particles that the cosmic rays create when they hit the >> atmosphere. >> >> Even large detectors, however, only capture a few traces of >> the high energy particles that reach the Earth, meaning that >> careful studies of their origin can take years, possibly >> even decades. So some researchers decided it might be >> possible to take advantage of a large population of >> non-specialized detectors that are pre-positioned all over >> the world: cell phone cameras. >> >> The researchers from the University of California have >> drafted a paper in which they describe testing whether a >> smartphone camera can detect high energy photons and >> particles of the sort produced by cosmic rays. Testing with >> radioactive isotopes of radium, cobalt, and cesium showed >> that the detector easily picked up gamma rays (and you >> didn't even have to point the phones at the source!). They >> also put a phone inside a lead box and showed that they >> could detect high energy particles. Finally, they took a >> phone up on a commercial flight and were able to obtain a >> particle track across the detector. > > > Sam, you didn't need to make such a lengthy reply. In the hypothetical situation where a spaceship is traveling close to c, collision with atoms in space are sometimes referred to as "virtual cosmic rays", because at the speed the ship would be traveling, the speed of those atoms relative to the ship would pack the same energy as real cosmic rays observed here on Earth. > > Double-A > It's the grains of sand, not individual atoms that are the problem for relativistic space travelers. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-20 22:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <74i4ic-c5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #534244 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/20/15 12:46 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Sam Wormley wrote: >>> >>> On 11/19/15 10:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> "space debris"???? How did you manage to throw in the garbage in here?!? >>> >>> Just like chicken-man, it's everywhere, its everywhere! >>> >>> Relativity theory, tantalizing in terms of fast space travel, also >>> predicts the demise of near light-speed space travel. The slightest >>> bit of interstellar debris with relative velocity close to the speed >>> of light will vaporize one's space ship. >>> >> >> >> You keep bring up "Relativity theory", but you're posting from >> 'sci.physics' newsgroup...shouldn't you be posting in the toymaker newsgroup? sci.physics.relativity >> > > What percentage of the posts in sci.physics.relativity are about > Einstein's special or general relativity? Irrelevant; all posts about Einstein's special or general relativity should be to sci.physics.relativity. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-20 17:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <SvydnRTtaeu4NdLLnZ2dnUU7-KudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #534266 |
On 11/20/15 4:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 11/20/15 12:46 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Sam Wormley wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/19/15 10:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> "space debris"???? How did you manage to throw in the garbage in here?!? >>>> >>>> Just like chicken-man, it's everywhere, its everywhere! >>>> >>>> Relativity theory, tantalizing in terms of fast space travel, also >>>> predicts the demise of near light-speed space travel. The slightest >>>> bit of interstellar debris with relative velocity close to the speed >>>> of light will vaporize one's space ship. >>>> >>> >>> >>> You keep bring up "Relativity theory", but you're posting from >>> 'sci.physics' newsgroup...shouldn't you be posting in the toymaker newsgroup? sci.physics.relativity >>> >> >> What percentage of the posts in sci.physics.relativity are about >> Einstein's special or general relativity? > > Irrelevant; all posts about Einstein's special or general relativity > should be to sci.physics.relativity. > > Reality doesn't always conform to "should be". -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 00:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qqq4ic-e71.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #534284 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/20/15 4:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 11/20/15 12:46 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> Sam Wormley wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 11/19/15 10:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> "space debris"???? How did you manage to throw in the garbage in here?!? >>>>> >>>>> Just like chicken-man, it's everywhere, its everywhere! >>>>> >>>>> Relativity theory, tantalizing in terms of fast space travel, also >>>>> predicts the demise of near light-speed space travel. The slightest >>>>> bit of interstellar debris with relative velocity close to the speed >>>>> of light will vaporize one's space ship. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> You keep bring up "Relativity theory", but you're posting from >>>> 'sci.physics' newsgroup...shouldn't you be posting in the toymaker newsgroup? sci.physics.relativity >>>> >>> >>> What percentage of the posts in sci.physics.relativity are about >>> Einstein's special or general relativity? >> >> Irrelevant; all posts about Einstein's special or general relativity >> should be to sci.physics.relativity. >> >> > > Reality doesn't always conform to "should be". Nor do certain cut and paste spamming ass holes. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-20 21:12 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <sdmdnRtHCP6KfNLLnZ2dnUU7-YXOydjZ@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #534310 |
On 11/20/15 6:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Nor do certain cut and paste spamming ass holes. Now, now, jimp, there you go again, your language is inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) > http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1997/ast06nov97_1/ > November 6, 1997: The next time you feel like you're barely dragging > along, blame relativity. You'll be stretching the point, but it > appears that Einstein was right: space and time get pulled out of > shape near a rotating body. > > Einstein predicted the effect, called ``frame dragging,'' 80 years > ago. Like many other aspects of Einstein's famous theories of > relativity, it's so subtle that no conventional method could measure > it. > > Using recent observations by X-ray astronomy satellites, including > NASA's Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, a team of astronomers is > announcing that they see evidence of frame dragging in disks of gas > swirling around a black hole. The discovery will be announced today > at a meeting of the High Energy Astrophysics Division of the American > Astronomical Society in Estes Park, Colo., by Dr. Wei Cui of the > Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and his colleagues, Dr. Nan > Zhang, working at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, and Dr. Wan > Chen of the University of Maryland in College Park. > > Frame dragging is one of the last frontiers in relativity. More > familiar and already proven are the conversion of mass into energy > (as seen in atomic bombs and stars) and back, the Lorentz > transformations that make objects near the speed of light grow > thinner and heavier and stretch time, and the warping of space by > gravity (as seen when light is bent by a massive object). > > Einstein also predicted that the rotation of an object would alter > space and time, dragging a nearby object out of position compared to > predictions by the simpler math of Sir Isaac Newton. > > The effect is incredibly small, about one part in a few trillion, > which means that you have to look at something very massive, or build > an instrument that is incredibly sensitive and put it in orbit. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 07:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4ci5ic-4h3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #534329 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/20/15 6:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Nor do certain cut and paste spamming ass holes. > > > > Now, now, jimp, Now, now, cut and paste spamming ass hole, go fuck yourself. Then die and make the world a better place. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 08:07 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ba6dnYmkIuRd583LnZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #534359 |
On 11/21/15 1:16 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Now, now, cut and paste spamming ass hole, go fuck yourself. > > Then die and make the world a better place. Now, now, jimp, there you go again, your language is inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) > http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1997/ast06nov97_1/ > November 6, 1997: The next time you feel like you're barely dragging > along, blame relativity. You'll be stretching the point, but it > appears that Einstein was right: space and time get pulled out of > shape near a rotating body. > > Einstein predicted the effect, called ``frame dragging,'' 80 years > ago. Like many other aspects of Einstein's famous theories of > relativity, it's so subtle that no conventional method could measure > it. > > Using recent observations by X-ray astronomy satellites, including > NASA's Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, a team of astronomers is > announcing that they see evidence of frame dragging in disks of gas > swirling around a black hole. The discovery will be announced today > at a meeting of the High Energy Astrophysics Division of the American > Astronomical Society in Estes Park, Colo., by Dr. Wei Cui of the > Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and his colleagues, Dr. Nan > Zhang, working at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, and Dr. Wan > Chen of the University of Maryland in College Park. > > Frame dragging is one of the last frontiers in relativity. More > familiar and already proven are the conversion of mass into energy > (as seen in atomic bombs and stars) and back, the Lorentz > transformations that make objects near the speed of light grow > thinner and heavier and stretch time, and the warping of space by > gravity (as seen when light is bent by a massive object). > > Einstein also predicted that the rotation of an object would alter > space and time, dragging a nearby object out of position compared to > predictions by the simpler math of Sir Isaac Newton. > > The effect is incredibly small, about one part in a few trillion, > which means that you have to look at something very massive, or build > an instrument that is incredibly sensitive and put it in orbit. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 19:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jft6ic-d88.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #534362 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/21/15 1:16 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Now, now, cut and paste spamming ass hole, go fuck yourself. >> >> Then die and make the world a better place. > > > > Now, now, jimp, Now, now, cut and paste spamming ass hole, fuck off and die. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 15:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <96idndhQBZGMQs3LnZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #534398 |
On 11/21/15 1:32 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > Now, now, cut and paste spamming ass hole, fuck off and die. > Now, now, jimp, there you go again, your language is inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) > http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1997/ast06nov97_1/ > November 6, 1997: The next time you feel like you're barely dragging > along, blame relativity. You'll be stretching the point, but it > appears that Einstein was right: space and time get pulled out of > shape near a rotating body. > > Einstein predicted the effect, called ``frame dragging,'' 80 years > ago. Like many other aspects of Einstein's famous theories of > relativity, it's so subtle that no conventional method could measure > it. > > Using recent observations by X-ray astronomy satellites, including > NASA's Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, a team of astronomers is > announcing that they see evidence of frame dragging in disks of gas > swirling around a black hole. The discovery will be announced today > at a meeting of the High Energy Astrophysics Division of the American > Astronomical Society in Estes Park, Colo., by Dr. Wei Cui of the > Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and his colleagues, Dr. Nan > Zhang, working at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, and Dr. Wan > Chen of the University of Maryland in College Park. > > Frame dragging is one of the last frontiers in relativity. More > familiar and already proven are the conversion of mass into energy > (as seen in atomic bombs and stars) and back, the Lorentz > transformations that make objects near the speed of light grow > thinner and heavier and stretch time, and the warping of space by > gravity (as seen when light is bent by a massive object). > > Einstein also predicted that the rotation of an object would alter > space and time, dragging a nearby object out of position compared to > predictions by the simpler math of Sir Isaac Newton. > > The effect is incredibly small, about one part in a few trillion, > which means that you have to look at something very massive, or build > an instrument that is incredibly sensitive and put it in orbit. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 22:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dp87ic-eb9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #534414 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/21/15 1:32 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> Now, now, cut and paste spamming ass hole, fuck off and die. >> > > > Now, now, jimp, Now, now, cut and paste spamming ass hole, please die now. I even said please. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 16:50 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <96idndZQBZG5aM3LnZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #534438 |
On 11/21/15 4:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Now, now, cut and paste spamming ass hole, please die now. "Please" is no excuse for your bad behavior, jimp, because your language is inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) > http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1997/ast06nov97_1/ > November 6, 1997: The next time you feel like you're barely dragging > along, blame relativity. You'll be stretching the point, but it > appears that Einstein was right: space and time get pulled out of > shape near a rotating body. > > Einstein predicted the effect, called ``frame dragging,'' 80 years > ago. Like many other aspects of Einstein's famous theories of > relativity, it's so subtle that no conventional method could measure > it. > > Using recent observations by X-ray astronomy satellites, including > NASA's Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, a team of astronomers is > announcing that they see evidence of frame dragging in disks of gas > swirling around a black hole. The discovery will be announced today > at a meeting of the High Energy Astrophysics Division of the American > Astronomical Society in Estes Park, Colo., by Dr. Wei Cui of the > Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and his colleagues, Dr. Nan > Zhang, working at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, and Dr. Wan > Chen of the University of Maryland in College Park. > > Frame dragging is one of the last frontiers in relativity. More > familiar and already proven are the conversion of mass into energy > (as seen in atomic bombs and stars) and back, the Lorentz > transformations that make objects near the speed of light grow > thinner and heavier and stretch time, and the warping of space by > gravity (as seen when light is bent by a massive object). > > Einstein also predicted that the rotation of an object would alter > space and time, dragging a nearby object out of position compared to > predictions by the simpler math of Sir Isaac Newton. > > The effect is incredibly small, about one part in a few trillion, > which means that you have to look at something very massive, or build > an instrument that is incredibly sensitive and put it in orbit. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 23:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lkb7ic-vj9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #534439 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/21/15 4:45 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Now, now, cut and paste spamming ass hole, please die now. > > > "Please" is no excuse for your bad behavior, And there is no excuse for your cut and paste spam, ass hole. Fuck off and die. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 07:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <BNudnfaeUcJNVMzLnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #534457 |
On 11/21/15 5:34 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Fuck off and die. Now, now, jimp, there you go again, your language is inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) > http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1997/ast06nov97_1/ > November 6, 1997: The next time you feel like you're barely dragging > along, blame relativity. You'll be stretching the point, but it > appears that Einstein was right: space and time get pulled out of > shape near a rotating body. > > Einstein predicted the effect, called ``frame dragging,'' 80 years > ago. Like many other aspects of Einstein's famous theories of > relativity, it's so subtle that no conventional method could measure > it. > > Using recent observations by X-ray astronomy satellites, including > NASA's Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, a team of astronomers is > announcing that they see evidence of frame dragging in disks of gas > swirling around a black hole. The discovery will be announced today > at a meeting of the High Energy Astrophysics Division of the American > Astronomical Society in Estes Park, Colo., by Dr. Wei Cui of the > Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and his colleagues, Dr. Nan > Zhang, working at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, and Dr. Wan > Chen of the University of Maryland in College Park. > > Frame dragging is one of the last frontiers in relativity. More > familiar and already proven are the conversion of mass into energy > (as seen in atomic bombs and stars) and back, the Lorentz > transformations that make objects near the speed of light grow > thinner and heavier and stretch time, and the warping of space by > gravity (as seen when light is bent by a massive object). > > Einstein also predicted that the rotation of an object would alter > space and time, dragging a nearby object out of position compared to > predictions by the simpler math of Sir Isaac Newton. > > The effect is incredibly small, about one part in a few trillion, > which means that you have to look at something very massive, or build > an instrument that is incredibly sensitive and put it in orbit. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 19:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oei9ic-kah.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #534538 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/21/15 5:34 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Fuck off and die. > > > > > Now, now, jimp, Eat shit, fuck off, and die. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 16:22 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ltKdndKmd7633c_LnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #534594 |
On 11/22/15 1:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Eat shit, fuck off, and die Now, now, jimp, there you go again, your language is inappropriate, and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) > http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1997/ast06nov97_1/ > November 6, 1997: The next time you feel like you're barely dragging > along, blame relativity. You'll be stretching the point, but it > appears that Einstein was right: space and time get pulled out of > shape near a rotating body. > > Einstein predicted the effect, called ``frame dragging,'' 80 years > ago. Like many other aspects of Einstein's famous theories of > relativity, it's so subtle that no conventional method could measure > it. > > Using recent observations by X-ray astronomy satellites, including > NASA's Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, a team of astronomers is > announcing that they see evidence of frame dragging in disks of gas > swirling around a black hole. The discovery will be announced today > at a meeting of the High Energy Astrophysics Division of the American > Astronomical Society in Estes Park, Colo., by Dr. Wei Cui of the > Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and his colleagues, Dr. Nan > Zhang, working at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, and Dr. Wan > Chen of the University of Maryland in College Park. > > Frame dragging is one of the last frontiers in relativity. More > familiar and already proven are the conversion of mass into energy > (as seen in atomic bombs and stars) and back, the Lorentz > transformations that make objects near the speed of light grow > thinner and heavier and stretch time, and the warping of space by > gravity (as seen when light is bent by a massive object). > > Einstein also predicted that the rotation of an object would alter > space and time, dragging a nearby object out of position compared to > predictions by the simpler math of Sir Isaac Newton. > > The effect is incredibly small, about one part in a few trillion, > which means that you have to look at something very massive, or build > an instrument that is incredibly sensitive and put it in orbit. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 23:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <j0v9ic-bgi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #534617 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/22/15 1:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Eat shit, fuck off, and die > > > > Now, now, jimp, Now, now, jimp, spamming cut and paste shit head, eat shit, fuck off, and die. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-19 07:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n2jp0g$pke$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #533991 |
Dne 18/11/2015 v 22:29 The Starmaker napsal(a): > Why are you posting news articles that were written on November 6, 1997? > > 6586 days ago > 941 weeks ago > 216 months ago > > almost 20 years ago??? > Perhaps because some even more than 100 years old news are still news for some people ? -- Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-18 16:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <59090688-bc76-4883-bd61-3e75d7b6e061@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #533932 |
On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 at 9:58:55 AM UTC-5, Sam Wormley wrote: > Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes > confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) > > http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1997/ast06nov97_1/ You know what Sam, we should petition to grant Einstein another Nobel Prize! Got any decent links -- hyper or otherwise -- to cut and paste petitions from? -- Mahipal
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-21 23:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fe0399b3-a0b6-42bb-b46e-05cff3782ec8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #533932 |
On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 at 4:58:55 PM UTC+2, Sam Wormley wrote: > Einstein was right - again! (Satellite observations of Black Holes > confirm frame-dragging effect 80 years after prediction) > > http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1997/ast06nov97_1/ > > > > November 6, 1997: The next time you feel like you're barely dragging > > along, blame relativity. You'll be stretching the point, but it > > appears that Einstein was right: space and time get pulled out of > > shape near a rotating body. > > > > Einstein predicted the effect, called ``frame dragging,'' 80 years > > ago. Like many other aspects of Einstein's famous theories of > > relativity, it's so subtle that no conventional method could measure > > it. > > > > Using recent observations by X-ray astronomy satellites, including > > NASA's Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, a team of astronomers is > > announcing that they see evidence of frame dragging in disks of gas > > swirling around a black hole. The discovery will be announced today > > at a meeting of the High Energy Astrophysics Division of the American > > Astronomical Society in Estes Park, Colo., by Dr. Wei Cui of the > > Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and his colleagues, Dr. Nan > > Zhang, working at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, and Dr. Wan > > Chen of the University of Maryland in College Park. > > > > Frame dragging is one of the last frontiers in relativity. More > > familiar and already proven are the conversion of mass into energy > > (as seen in atomic bombs and stars) and back, the Lorentz > > transformations that make objects near the speed of light grow > > thinner and heavier and stretch time, and the warping of space by > > gravity (as seen when light is bent by a massive object). > > > > Einstein also predicted that the rotation of an object would alter > > space and time, dragging a nearby object out of position compared to > > predictions by the simpler math of Sir Isaac Newton. ================================ imbeilw p > > > > The effect is incredibly small, about one part in a few trillion, > > which means that you have to look at something very massive, or build > > an instrument that is incredibly sensitive and put it in orbit. > > > -- >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web