Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #687163 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 251 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
"kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
" White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
"kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
"kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:25 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700
Page 13 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qkaPC.325580$PE5.56530@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #687593 |
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. On 5/28/2018 10:57 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 28 May 2018 11:51:51 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > >> On Mon, 28 May 2018 13:38:41 -0400, kensi >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 5/28/2018 10:48 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 5/28/2018 10:37 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 10:20:22 -0400, kensi >>>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> [Velikovsky] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not surprised in the *least* that you are a fan of this lo0n. >>>>>> >>>>>> He's still smarter and more popular than you are. >>>>> >>>>> Another Velikovsky fanb0i heard from. You fail astrophysics forever. >>>> >>>> Most likely since I don't do astrophysics. >>> >>> That much is obvious -- if you did, you'd think Velikovsky was full of >>> shit. >> >> He's still smarter and more popular than you are. > > Meanwhile, while you've been engaging in climate change denial and other > pseudoscientific woo, a named tropical storm has been killing people in > Florida AND IT ISN'T EVEN JUNE YET... > So says the ignorant nutjob complaining about "pseudoscience" and "deniers" but doesn't know enough science to understand that weather isn't climate. (Or maybe she does but just chooses to lie about it to try to fool the public)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pejgh5$15ub$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #687614 |
On 5/29/2018 6:55 AM, benj wrote: > On 5/28/2018 10:57 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Meanwhile, while you've been engaging in climate change denial and other >> pseudoscientific woo, a named tropical storm has been killing people in >> Florida AND IT ISN'T EVEN JUNE YET... > > So says the ignorant nutjob complaining about "pseudoscience" and > "deniers" but doesn't know enough science to understand that weather > isn't climate. (Or maybe she does but just chooses to lie about it to > try to fool the public) One named storm is weather. Named storms coming earlier and earlier in the year is climate. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <BxfPC.111442$JJ3.95054@fx23.iad> |
| In reply to | #687624 |
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. On 5/29/2018 8:19 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/29/2018 6:55 AM, benj wrote: >> On 5/28/2018 10:57 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Meanwhile, while you've been engaging in climate change denial and other >>> pseudoscientific woo, a named tropical storm has been killing people in >>> Florida AND IT ISN'T EVEN JUNE YET... >> >> So says the ignorant nutjob complaining about "pseudoscience" and >> "deniers" but doesn't know enough science to understand that weather >> isn't climate. (Or maybe she does but just chooses to lie about it to >> try to fool the public) > > One named storm is weather. Named storms coming earlier and earlier in > the year is climate. > Once again you as an anonymous insane liberal voice on the internet demonstrate in a world-wide public forum you are a total uneducated ignorant moron who needs to be ignored. If you had one TENTH of the science knowledge you pretend to have you'd know that named storms coming earlier and earlier in a year is also weather and not climate. Climate is an average of weather over 15 or 20 years. And that doesn't even address your lie that storms are coming earlier and are stronger. You pretend you don't know about the link between el Nino and storm production and you pretend weather is climate and you don't even have a real name or address. Why would ANYONE pay the slightest attention to your blather?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <venogdtrno7ntk2frpjbvs2ashvlisfj2d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #687482 |
On Mon, 28 May 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 5/27/2018 6:25 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Sat, 26 May 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Racism notwithstanding, why do so many of Kensi's posts contain the >>> phrase "a new study SUGGESTS"? That ain't science. >> >> Exactly! Have you read Benj's essay on the subject. >> It's quite good so far. I'm about halfway through >> it. I liked the part about Tesla and Veliskoski(SP?) > >Well of course you did, since Velikovsky is a complete and utter quack >and a lunatic. > >https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky > >"Controversy reigned when the book's publisher (Macmillan) was forced to >tear up Velikovsky's contract and pulp the book when it was top of the >best-seller list, due to the ire of the scientific community who >threatened to boycott Macmillan's textbooks if it did not stop peddling >the egregious bullshit." > >Needless to say, that wackjob is infamous among astrophysicists, when >we're not using his /Worlds in Collision/ as a quick recipe for belly >laughs. It's packed from stem to stern with howlers. > >... "In short, comparative mythology was not a valid way to perform >research into astrophysics, as it neglected such small matters as the >conservation of angular momentum." > >I'm not surprised in the *least* that you are a fan of this lo0n. "Welcome to my parlor," said the spider to the fly . . . Ha ha! How tender and delicious a morsel to be so delivered - hoist on her own petard! Benj's essay respecting Tesla and Velikovski has less to do with their works per se than with their shabby treatment by an elitist scientific community who, rather than employ the scientific method, quickly and inanely resorted to ad hominems, bullying and ostracizing. And, you just did exactly the same thing thus proving benj is spot on in his essay where he accurately portrays how unscientific science and its lackeys have become of late. LOL. Yours is the real pseudo science, Dr. Kensington. SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pekcs1$ooj$39@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687675 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:24:38 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Mon, 28 May 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>On 5/27/2018 6:25 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Racism notwithstanding, why do so many of Kensi's posts contain the >>>> phrase "a new study SUGGESTS"? That ain't science. >>> >>> Exactly! Have you read Benj's essay on the subject. >>> It's quite good so far. I'm about halfway through it. I liked the part >>> about Tesla and Veliskoski(SP?) >> >>Well of course you did, since Velikovsky is a complete and utter quack >>and a lunatic. >> >>https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky >> >>"Controversy reigned when the book's publisher (Macmillan) was forced to >>tear up Velikovsky's contract and pulp the book when it was top of the >>best-seller list, due to the ire of the scientific community who >>threatened to boycott Macmillan's textbooks if it did not stop peddling >>the egregious bullshit." >> >>Needless to say, that wackjob is infamous among astrophysicists, when >>we're not using his /Worlds in Collision/ as a quick recipe for belly >>laughs. It's packed from stem to stern with howlers. >> >>... "In short, comparative mythology was not a valid way to perform >>research into astrophysics, as it neglected such small matters as the >>conservation of angular momentum." >> >>I'm not surprised in the *least* that you are a fan of this lo0n. > > "Welcome to my parlor," said the spider to the fly . . . > > Ha ha! How tender and delicious a morsel to be so delivered - hoist on > her own petard! > > Benj's essay respecting Tesla and Velikovski has less to do with their > works per se than with their shabby treatment by an elitist scientific > community who, rather than employ the scientific method, quickly and > inanely resorted to ad hominems, bullying and ostracizing. > > And, you just did exactly the same thing thus proving benj is spot on in > his essay where he accurately portrays how unscientific science and its > lackeys have become of late. > > LOL. Yours is the real pseudo science, Dr. Kensington. > > SP<SMACKAKOOK!> https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky SPNAK! -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <2ylPC.162827$T14.92717@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #687675 |
On 5/29/2018 1:24 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Mon, 28 May 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 5/27/2018 6:25 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Racism notwithstanding, why do so many of Kensi's posts contain the >>>> phrase "a new study SUGGESTS"? That ain't science. >>> >>> Exactly! Have you read Benj's essay on the subject. >>> It's quite good so far. I'm about halfway through >>> it. I liked the part about Tesla and Veliskoski(SP?) >> >> Well of course you did, since Velikovsky is a complete and utter quack >> and a lunatic. >> >> https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky >> >> "Controversy reigned when the book's publisher (Macmillan) was forced to >> tear up Velikovsky's contract and pulp the book when it was top of the >> best-seller list, due to the ire of the scientific community who >> threatened to boycott Macmillan's textbooks if it did not stop peddling >> the egregious bullshit." >> >> Needless to say, that wackjob is infamous among astrophysicists, when >> we're not using his /Worlds in Collision/ as a quick recipe for belly >> laughs. It's packed from stem to stern with howlers. >> >> ... "In short, comparative mythology was not a valid way to perform >> research into astrophysics, as it neglected such small matters as the >> conservation of angular momentum." >> >> I'm not surprised in the *least* that you are a fan of this lo0n. > > "Welcome to my parlor," said the spider to the fly . . . > > Ha ha! How tender and delicious a morsel to be so > delivered - hoist on her own petard! > > Benj's essay respecting Tesla and Velikovski has less > to do with their works per se than with their shabby > treatment by an elitist scientific community who, rather > than employ the scientific method, quickly and inanely > resorted to ad hominems, bullying and ostracizing. > > And, you just did exactly the same thing thus proving > benj is spot on in his essay where he accurately portrays > how unscientific science and its lackeys have become of > late. > > LOL. Yours is the real pseudo science, Dr. Kensington. > > SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) > Shame on you Sir Greg! You actually READ what I wrote (and understood it too!) instead of just calling me a "kook" and ignorant. Clearly you have no place in Modern Science. And It's clear that no science institution such as the one where "kensi" is a janitor, would ever hire the likes of you!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fnkfbpF144fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #687176 |
On 27/05/2018 1:30 AM, benj wrote: > On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote: >> Rice â the staple food of billions â will become less nutritious as >> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests: >> >> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-having-a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice >> >> > Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! > Oh wait. That's not worse... **Moron. You seem to neglect several obvious facts: 1) On average every American consumes around 10kg of rice each year. 2) Rice is a basic food for a large number of livestock in the US (including pet foods). 3) Various areas of the US produce very large quantities of rice for local consumption and export. Rice growers will suffer. Whichever way you slice it, the costs to the US will be significant. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pf53p4$s94$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688646 |
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message news:fnkfbpF144fU1@mid.individual.net... > On 27/05/2018 1:30 AM, benj wrote: >> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote: >>> Rice â the staple food of billions â will become less nutritious as >>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests: >>> >>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-having-a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice >>> >> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving! >> Oh wait. That's not worse... > > **Moron. You seem to neglect several obvious facts: > > 1) On average every American consumes around 10kg of rice each year. > 2) Rice is a basic food for a large number of livestock in the US > (including pet foods). > 3) Various areas of the US produce very large quantities of rice for local > consumption and export. Rice growers will suffer. > > Whichever way you slice it, the costs to the US will be significant. Not really, even if necessary supplements are plentiful and cheap. However, I think such a minor reduction probably wouldn't make any difference in virtually every case since by and large such nutrients exist at level above those strictly necessary for proper health.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pel6d4$k51$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687163 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:peb7sg$1h7f$1@gioia.aioe.org... > Rice â the staple food of billions â will become less nutritious as carbon > dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests: > > http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-having-a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice Great.....and did the amount of rice grown increase in proportion?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 14:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <415eb53f-9de4-4629-93d7-e764e702f943@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #687163 |
On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 2:03:16 AM UTC-7, kensi wrote: > Rice â the staple food of billions â will become less nutritious as > carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests: > > http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-having-a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice > > -- > "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain > the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks > "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade > in here." ~Checkmate Best to eat MSP,corn,and peas.No Eggs,fat,or sugar.Salt has killed millions.Beer in modulation OK White wine OK Bread two slices of rye toasted.Apples, strawberries,peaches,and pineapples and you will live to 105 as long as GOP Mafia does not give you TANG.I'm do for TANG,and you all know why.I'm always showing how they have killed and got away free.The truths on Trump,Bush,Nixon Annenberg,Kissinger,and their lies.If I was a reporter on the Washington Post I would be dead meat.Bradlee told me this.Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pfeuqm$b0v$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #689559 |
"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote "I would be dead meat" Bert But Bert's Double-Asshole did finally show TurdBert now has a happy glow. (LOL) > > ------- See: Glazier's Dossier ------- e.g <http://tinyurl.com/Blog-of-2-fecal-kikes-Mar2017> > > hmmm... <snicker> <chuckle> <chortle> ROTFLMAO
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web