Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #726594 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-10 06:33 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-02-10 17:07 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 66 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-10 06:33 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-09 23:49 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-10 14:26 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-10 20:02 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-10 17:07 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 15:09 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-10 14:23 -0600
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-10 19:45 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 12:53 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-10 23:35 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 16:50 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 00:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 17:17 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 17:38 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-11 01:22 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 18:25 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 03:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 05:59 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 20:11 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 06:03 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-11 21:25 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 21:51 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-12 01:49 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 18:56 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-11 20:23 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 03:36 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-12 06:46 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 06:08 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-12 21:32 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-12 14:59 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 22:37 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 15:48 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-12 23:13 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:26 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:08 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 22:00 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:06 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-14 06:03 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 21:08 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 00:18 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:11 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-15 07:26 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:02 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 07:02 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-16 06:09 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 22:00 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-16 08:18 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-15 05:41 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-12 17:13 -0600
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:25 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:07 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 23:07 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-12 09:14 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 17:17 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-13 00:27 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-12 19:49 -0500
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 06:09 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-13 01:11 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 18:22 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-13 06:08 +0200
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 22:31 -0800
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 17:14 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 00:48 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-10 18:19 -0700
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-02-11 03:04 +0000
Re: Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 17:07 -0600
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 06:33 +0200 |
| Subject | Grand Solar Minimum Would Barely Dent Global Warming |
| Message-ID | <q3o9ih$1tp2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? The short answer is, ‘No’: https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-09 23:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36c9777b76171058996432@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #726594 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q3o9ih$1tp2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ¤ So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could ¤ have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how ¤ human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it ¤ plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? ¤ ¤ The short answer is, ?No?: So "Yes" would be a longer answer, amiright? -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 14:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bfu06etv5kfbs64f0vlpfubmkfm72l8aot@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #726611 |
On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 23:49:52 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: > In article <q3o9ih$1tp2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >¤ So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >¤ have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how >¤ human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >¤ plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >¤ >¤ The short answer is, ?No?: > >So "Yes" would be a longer answer, amiright? So, kensi proves again that she's a fake astrophysicist because she actually believes human activity causes more global warming than the Sun. This means she's totally clueless as to the vast amounts of energy the Earth receives from the Sun and how the Sun affects Earth's climate at least 99 percent more than any human activity can. Oh, and did you notice her FAKED time stamp of +2 hours to make it appear that she's in Helsinki? Bwaaahahha. What a hoot! -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 20:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q3q00k$5gl$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #726637 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 14:26:23 -0500, Stinky Geggzlz Hell, Fleabitten Nazi Rapist geggzled: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 23:49:52 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > wrote: >> In article <q3o9ih$1tp2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >> kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >>¤ So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >>¤ have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on >>how ¤ human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >>¤ plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >>¤ >>¤ The short answer is, ?No?: >> >>So "Yes" would be a longer answer, amiright? > > So, kensi proves again that she's a fake astrophysicist because she > actually believes human activity causes more global warming than the > Sun. This means she's totally clueless as to the vast amounts of energy > the Earth receives from the Sun and how the Sun affects Earth's climate > at least 99 percent more than any human activity can. That argument's been refuted a thousand times already. > Oh, and did you notice her FAKED Proof, kook? > time stamp of +2 hours to make it appear that she's in Helsinki? > Bwaaahahha. What a hoot! No, but I'm not surprised, since she *did* say she was moving there. I *did* notice that her reappearance seems to have induced another massive meltdown from the dizum sporger though. Someone is so, so totally pwned ... <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 17:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nq716ehsij4pom9ovqfgmb3kmu1qsvlhir@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #726641 |
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019, Nagging Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Sun, 10 Feb 2019, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. spaketh verily... <...> >> So, kensi proves again that she's a fake astrophysicist because she >> actually believes human activity causes more global warming than the >> Sun. This means she's totally clueless as to the vast amounts of energy >> the Earth receives from the Sun and how the Sun affects Earth's climate >> at least 99 percent more than any human activity can. > >That argument's been refuted a thousand times already. Proof, k0oky, that the argument has been refuted a thousand times. >> Oh, and did you notice her FAKED > >Proof, kook? It's there in the headers for all to see, k0oky! >> time stamp of +2 hours to make it appear that she's in Helsinki? >> Bwaaahahha. What a hoot! > >No, but I'm not surprised, since she *did* say she was moving there. And, you believed that lying little fake astrophysicist? >I *did* notice that her reappearance seems to have induced another massive >meltdown from the dizum sporger though. Someone is so, so totally pwned ... More like kensi IS the Dizum sporger, you idiot! -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 15:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvmt07.ug7.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #726660 |
On 2019-02-10 3:07 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019, Nagging Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Feb 2019, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. spaketh verily... > > <...> > >>> So, kensi proves again that she's a fake astrophysicist because she >>> actually believes human activity causes more global warming than the >>> Sun. This means she's totally clueless as to the vast amounts of energy >>> the Earth receives from the Sun and how the Sun affects Earth's climate >>> at least 99 percent more than any human activity can. >> >> That argument's been refuted a thousand times already. > > Proof, k0oky, that the argument has been refuted > a thousand times. > >>> Oh, and did you notice her FAKED >> >> Proof, kook? > > It's there in the headers for all to see, k0oky! > >>> time stamp of +2 hours to make it appear that she's in Helsinki? >>> Bwaaahahha. What a hoot! >> >> No, but I'm not surprised, since she *did* say she was moving there. > > And, you believed that lying little fake astrophysicist? > >> I *did* notice that her reappearance seems to have induced another massive >> meltdown from the dizum sporger though. Someone is so, so totally pwned ... > > More like kensi IS the Dizum sporger, you idiot! > did your mountain tell you that
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 14:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q3q17q$1rlo$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #726637 |
On 2/10/2019 1:26 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 23:49:52 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <q3o9ih$1tp2$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>>
>> ¤ So these two articles are *suggest*ing that a grand solar minimum *could*
>> ¤ have a net cooling *effect* in the *ballpark* of 1 to 6°C, *depending* on how
>> ¤ human greenhouse gas emissions *change* over the next century. Is it
>> ¤ plausible that a grand solar minimum *could* make that happen?
>> ¤
>> ¤ The short answer is, ?No?:
>>
>> So "Yes" would be a longer answer, amiright?
>
> So, kensi proves again that she's a fake astrophysicist
> because she actually believes human activity causes more
> global warming than the Sun. This means she's totally
> clueless as to the vast amounts of energy the Earth
> receives from the Sun and how the Sun affects Earth's
> climate at least 99 percent more than any human activity
> can.
>
> Oh, and did you notice her FAKED time stamp of +2 hours
> to make it appear that she's in Helsinki? Bwaaahahha.
> What a hoot!
>
*weasel words* identified,
kensi pupa feeds on journalistic speculation poo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 19:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726594 |
In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could > have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how > human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it > plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? > > The short answer is, ‘No’: > > https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ > We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James Hansen that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 12:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ca2f4030e6a07130f@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #726639 |
In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > >In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >> have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how >> human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >> plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >> >> The short answer is, ?No?: >> >> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >> > >We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James Hansen >that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. > >http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo What's a jimp?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 23:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <i3p6jf-g4m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726640 |
In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: > In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com > says... >> >>In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >>> have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how >>> human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >>> plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >>> >>> The short answer is, ?No?: >>> >>> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >>> >> >>We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James Hansen >>that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. >> >>http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo > > What's a jimp? Something far beyond the understanding of an adolescent skeeter. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 16:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvn2td.49t.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #726673 |
On 2019-02-10 4:35 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >> says... >>> >>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >>>> have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how >>>> human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >>>> plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >>>> >>>> The short answer is, ?No?: >>>> >>>> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >>>> >>> >>> We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James Hansen >>> that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. >>> >>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >> >> What's a jimp? > > Something far beyond the understanding of an adolescent skeeter. > yea but , what's a jimp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 00:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8nq6jf-c9m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726674 |
In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2019-02-10 4:35 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>> says... >>>> >>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >>>>> have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how >>>>> human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >>>>> plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >>>>> >>>>> The short answer is, ?No?: >>>>> >>>>> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James Hansen >>>> that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. >>>> >>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>> >>> What's a jimp? >> >> Something far beyond the understanding of an adolescent skeeter. >> > > yea but , what's a jimp Something far beyond the understanding of all adolescent, cross posting, half witted, twits. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 17:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ca6d207f17094c1325@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #726677 |
In article <8nq6jf-c9m.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... > >In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2019-02-10 4:35 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >>>>>> have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how >>>>>> human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >>>>>> plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >>>>>> >>>>>> The short answer is, ?No?: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James Hansen >>>>> that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>> >>>> What's a jimp? >>> >>> Something far beyond the understanding of an adolescent skeeter. >>> >> >> yea but , what's a jimp > >Something far beyond the understanding of all adolescent, cross posting, >half witted, twits. OK, so we know your mom doesn't even know what it means, enlighten us.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 17:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvn5mv.r7k.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #726677 |
On 2019-02-10 5:03 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2019-02-10 4:35 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum could >>>>>> have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, depending on how >>>>>> human greenhouse gas emissions change over the next century. Is it >>>>>> plausible that a grand solar minimum could make that happen? >>>>>> >>>>>> The short answer is, ?No?: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum-would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James Hansen >>>>> that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming-expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>> >>>> What's a jimp? >>> >>> Something far beyond the understanding of an adolescent skeeter. >>> >> >> yea but , what's a jimp > > Something far beyond the understanding of all adolescent, cross posting, > half witted, twits. > > i don't crosspost hammer lips i just reply in them
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 01:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q3qipf$n4d$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #726677 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:03:20 +0000, jimp wrote: > In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2019-02-10 4:35 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... >>>>> >>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum >>>>>> could have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, >>>>>> depending on how human greenhouse gas emissions change over the >>>>>> next century. Is it plausible that a grand solar minimum could make >>>>>> that happen? >>>>>> >>>>>> The short answer is, ?No?: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum- would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James >>>>> Hansen that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming- expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>> >>>> What's a jimp? >>> >>> Something far beyond the understanding of an adolescent skeeter. >>> >>> >> yea but , what's a jimp > > Something far beyond the understanding of all adolescent, cross posting, > half witted, twits. But if it's beyond your understanding, why are you using it as your usenet nym? <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 18:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bvn8f9.rnh.19.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #726685 |
On 2019-02-10 6:22 p.m., Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:03:20 +0000, jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2019-02-10 4:35 p.m., jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> In article <tib6jf-3sk.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com says... >>>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> So these two articles are suggesting that a grand solar minimum >>>>>>> could have a net cooling effect in the ballpark of 1 to 6°C, >>>>>>> depending on how human greenhouse gas emissions change over the >>>>>>> next century. Is it plausible that a grand solar minimum could make >>>>>>> that happen? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The short answer is, ?No?: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://climatecrocks.com/2013/08/14/nuccitelli-grand-solar-minimum- > would-barely-dent-global-warming/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> We also have the 13 year old announcement by your darling James >>>>>> Hansen that we only have 10 years to avert catastrophe. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14834318/ns/us_news-environment/t/warming- > expert-only-decade-left-act-time/#.XEeySlxKiPo >>>>> >>>>> What's a jimp? >>>> >>>> Something far beyond the understanding of an adolescent skeeter. >>>> >>>> >>> yea but , what's a jimp >> >> Something far beyond the understanding of all adolescent, cross posting, >> half witted, twits. > > But if it's beyond your understanding, why are you using it as your usenet > nym? > > <snicker> > can you prove anything
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 03:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q857jf-79n.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726685 |
In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > <snicker> About all that comes out of adolescent twits. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 05:59 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q3qrvh$1f7g$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #726702 |
On 2/10/2019 10:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:03:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> yea but , what's a jimp >>> >>> Something far beyond the understanding of all adolescent, cross posting, >>> half witted, twits. >> >> But if it's beyond your understanding, why are you using it as your usenet >> nym? >> >> <snicker> > > About all that comes out of adolescent twits. An IKYABWAI lame? *That's* the best retort you could think up after an hour and a half? You disappoint me, climate change denier. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-10 20:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ca95ab8ddd645e996448@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #726709 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q3qrvh$1f7g$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ¤ ¤ On 2/10/2019 10:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: ¤ > In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: ¤ >> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:03:20 +0000, jimp wrote: ¤ >>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: ¤ >>>> yea but , what's a jimp ¤ >>> ¤ >>> Something far beyond the understanding of all adolescent, cross posting, ¤ >>> half witted, twits. ¤ >> ¤ >> But if it's beyond your understanding, why are you using it as your usenet ¤ >> nym? ¤ >> ¤ >> <snicker> ¤ > ¤ > About all that comes out of adolescent twits. ¤ ¤ An IKYABWAI lame? *That's* the best retort you could think up after an ¤ hour and a half? You disappoint me, climate change denier. Are you really in "Helsinki"? -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me> "People just submitted it ... I don't know why ... They 'trust me' ... dumb fucks." -Mark Zuckerberg "You can be unethical and still be legal that's the way I live my life." -Mark Zuckerberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-11 06:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1qf7jf-78o.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #726709 |
In sci.physics kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > On 2/10/2019 10:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:03:20 +0000, jimp wrote: >>>> In sci.physics % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> yea but , what's a jimp >>>> >>>> Something far beyond the understanding of all adolescent, cross posting, >>>> half witted, twits. >>> >>> But if it's beyond your understanding, why are you using it as your usenet >>> nym? >>> >>> <snicker> >> >> About all that comes out of adolescent twits. > > An IKYABWAI lame? *That's* the best retort you could think up after an > hour and a half? You disappoint me, climate change denier. Blow it out your ass child. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web