Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #730024 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-03-02 18:17 -0800 |
| Last post | 2019-03-04 00:47 +0000 |
| Articles | 12 on this page of 32 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
pages1 &2, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 18:17 -0800
pages1 &2, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 10:32 -0800
page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:59 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 06:50 +0000
page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 08:25 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 16:38 +0000
update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 14:35 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 22:45 +0000
Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 18:50 -0800
Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 21:53 -0800
Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 09:12 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 17:27 +0000
Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 13:45 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 21:55 +0000
Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 14:46 -0800
Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 18:51 -0800
Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-07 18:14 -0800
Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-08 19:19 -0800
Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-09 11:46 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-10 17:08 +0000
Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 14:43 -0700
Does Faraday law have an inverse where: thrusting bar magnet near a prism with photons moving through has a offsetting motion Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 16:52 -0700
experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 18:02 -0700
experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 18:13 -0700
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-11 02:20 +0000
Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 19:58 -0700
Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 21:22 -0700
Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-11 12:11 -0700
Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-11 14:03 -0700
Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-11 20:58 -0700
Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-12 11:51 -0700
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 00:47 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-10 14:43 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook |
| Message-ID | <39027138-c09a-4363-93bc-155dcb6e976c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #731052 |
On Saturday, March 9, 2019 at 1:46:51 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Friday, March 8, 2019 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > Is there a name in math for this— scooting along x-axis when distance is unknown but position is accurate. > > > > For once we scoot over the galaxies, we get them forming the surface of a cylinder or a coil of wire in Faraday Law. > Especially in the last layers of .04 <z<.05 then .05<z<.06 where we see the galaxies clustering more to the rightside of the picture to fill in for the next Rings. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-10 16:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Does Faraday law have an inverse where: thrusting bar magnet near a prism with photons moving through has a offsetting motion |
| Message-ID | <4a2467f5-6a3a-4379-a0d0-b9dce03eef38@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #731189 |
I conducted several experiments using a prism, laser light beams, magnets to see if I could get a redshift that I was not supposed to get. Too small to measure in my setup if there was a "enlarged redshift". But, what I was able to get, was a slight motion of the green and red lasers as I moved a magnet nearby the prism. Have to repeat it to make sure, because I may have contaminated the light with the magnet reflections, so many reflections involved. For now, let me just say-- I noticed a perceptible motion-- small motion and movement of the light beam due to the motion of my magnet. Sort of like a inverse Faraday Law where instead of motion of monopoles, here I have motion of photons due to motion of a thrusting magnet. Now would that not be lovely lovely lovely. That the Faraday law has an inverse of thrusting bar magnet of photons in a prism have a motion. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-10 18:02 -0700 |
| Subject | experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get |
| Message-ID | <5dcde980-d477-494c-b542-bffd5e194449@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #731206 |
Alright i have a Sanyo flat screen TV. Perfect to run a diffraction experiment and see if there is too much redshift. So i have a incandescent bulb nearby and observe the spectrum on the screen as the tv is off. Now there is more green light than yellow or orange and red is the most predominant. The green light should be less than yellow and far less than orange. Now the blue, indigo, violet are very prominent near the white light source and taper off to almost nothing the further out where red dominates. Now i do realize the geometry of the screen and chemical composition play a role in these results. What i am looking for is that light is redshifted naturally in its wandering from place to place. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-10 18:13 -0700 |
| Subject | experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get |
| Message-ID | <f2dd4b81-348f-4b77-81d6-095de2831c5a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #731215 |
Amazing, my Sanyo diffraction is matching astronomy’s doppler blue and redshift. Near the white light source the blue,indigo,violet are the largest bands while red,orange are tiny bands. Then further away from the light source the red bands are dominate. So here we see that redshift of light is about the medium light travels through and says nothing about distance to source nor motion of source. Doppler redshift of light was one of 20th century’s most insane and crazy ideas to have come along. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-11 02:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <q64glc$5ln$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #731217 |
AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science: >So here we see that redshift of light is about the medium light travels >through and says nothing about distance to source nor motion of source. Dopple= "We" again, Archie? You and your diseased cats? Don't you think you should take your diseased cats to the vet rather than trying to teach them astronomy and optics? x-no-archive: yes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-10 19:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get |
| Message-ID | <315908e5-6ff7-4576-98fb-e85817de986f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #731217 |
On Sunday, March 10, 2019 at 8:13:12 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Amazing, my Sanyo diffraction is matching astronomy’s doppler blue and redshift. Near the white light source the blue,indigo,violet are the largest bands while red,orange are tiny bands. Then further away from the light source the red bands are dominate. > > So here we see that redshift of light is about the medium light travels through and says nothing about distance to source nor motion of source. Doppler redshift of light was one of 20th century’s most insane and crazy ideas to have come along. > If I recall correctly the blueshifts ever observed in cosmology were all nearby galaxies. So that would match with the Sanyo TV screen, where blueshifts are close to the white light source and redshift tiny, but the further distance away from the white light, the dominant color is a redshift with hardly any blue,indigo, violet. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-10 21:22 -0700 |
| Subject | Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get |
| Message-ID | <0fa861c4-f6e8-469d-af34-ac2791436f00@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #731235 |
So i am studying this experiment carefully. I am sitting in a rocking chair and in back of me is a light stand with 3 incandescent raw bulbs. The flat screen Sanyo in front of me a little less than 3 meters. I have the TV off but can see the bulbs in reflection and see a rainbow of colors in rays, 4 main rays. I am looking for a preference of redshift. Immediately close to the white bulbs is a large band of violet, indigo, blue, just a tiny band of orange, red. But by the 3rd series of bands the blue-violet shrinks and the orange-red dominate. And the further out i go becomes almost all red. Can we call this “tired light” It certainly has nothing to do with motion for the white bulbs are stationary. And it has nothing to do with distance for i get several reflections. What my guess is— it is that all light is shifted to the red by the medium it transits. This would signify in cosmology that the galaxies we see are a tiny fraction of what exists, but light fades away into red then black so fast that we cannot know distant galaxies. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-11 12:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get |
| Message-ID | <84e46cf2-611a-4888-801a-2ce14d220225@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #731252 |
I am going to see if my iphone screen or MacBook screen duplicates the diffraction pattern on my Sanyo TV. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-11 14:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get |
| Message-ID | <2d99ca07-900f-497f-bb00-a82e2e26b382@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #731326 |
On Monday, March 11, 2019 at 2:11:24 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > I am going to see if my iphone screen or MacBook screen duplicates the diffraction pattern on my Sanyo TV. > Alright, my iphone screen and MacBook Air screen do the same thing of diffraction of light of a white source such as a powerful penlite flashlight. I get the rainbow color diffraction pattern on all three. The best is the Sanyo TV. I get a different looking pattern on iphone and MacBook and have to study them somewhat. I wonder if the pattern is associated with the concept of "cells" that makes up the screen. Each cell of the screen doing some diffraction of the white light-- just a question, mind you. For on the iphone and MacBook screen I get the blue and red to be uniformly the same, whereas on the Sanyo TV I get the blue majority near the light and red dominating at a distance from the light source. Is it that the TV has more distinct cells? I do not know. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-11 20:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get |
| Message-ID | <81813833-f3aa-4696-a038-fa9f279419b2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #731336 |
So i think this will lead to a simple explanation of redshift as a diffraction pattern and not a distance measure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-12 11:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get |
| Message-ID | <6283442a-d045-434d-b26e-1c9025182c76@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #731387 |
Yes, now each light source shining on the Sanyo TV screen—flat screen— whether white incandescent or green or red laser gives me a X shaped diffraction pattern. With white light the diffraction is broken up into the rainbow of red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet. Predominately blue near white light source and predominately red further away from light source. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-04 00:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <q5hsit$6ds$4@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #730024 |
AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science: >On Saturday, March 2, 2019 at 4:15:31 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: >> Village Idiot Archimedes Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test >Eastside is worse than a Village Idiot How can Eastside be worse than you, Village Idiot Plutonium? x-no-archive: yes
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web