Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #731058 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-03-09 12:07 -0800 |
| Last post | 2019-03-10 17:13 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Is there a name in math for this— scooting along x-axis when distance is unknown but position is accurate. Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-09 12:07 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-10 17:13 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-09 12:07 -0800 |
| Subject | Is there a name in math for this— scooting along x-axis when distance is unknown but position is accurate. |
| Message-ID | <9a813216-41a0-4fef-bade-24d092f11016@googlegroups.com> |
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 10:32:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject: pages1 &2, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by
Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2019 18:32:22 +0000
What is interesting here is that cosmology was only borne when Jarrett at Caltech noticed a cosmic ring of galaxies, and before that cosmology was just a waste dump of error.
As we begin to properly find the true distance to galaxies the we see more and more rings.
AP
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 20:59:32 -0800 (PST)
Subject: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by
Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron
= 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 04:59:32 +0000
page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole
page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole
However, there is the other picture of the Universe, we must consider. Instead of the Generator of thrusting bar magnet, the Battery picture of the universe. We have one piece of evidence for the Generator picture in Jarrett's ring. However, within that same observation is mentioned the Great Attractor. And a battery is a great attractor of the fluid ions (magnetic monopoles). Could we have had a electric creature like the electric eel that lived on dry land without being immersed in a fluid? The electric eel is a great example of a electric generator via battery.
--- quoting ---
http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/papers/LSS/
The third layer (0.01 < z < 0.02) is dominated by the P-P
supercluster
(left side of image) and the P-I supercluster extending up into the
ZoA terminating as the Great Attractor region (notably Abell 3627)
disappears behind a wall of Milky Way stars. An intriguing "ring" or
chain of galaxies seems to circle/extend from the northern to the
southern Galactic hemisphere (see also Figure 1). It is unknown
whether this ring-like structure is physically associated with the
cosmic web or an artifact of projection.
--- end quoting ---
That paragraph by Jarrett is very vague, for it does not tell me if the Great Attractor is in P-P or P-I or did he mean to say in both. Remember in logic: Either..Or..Or.. Both is a contradiction of Boole Logic and here Jarrett is using a contradiction.
But Astronomy as of 2019 is primitive, very primitive, for our first bits of evidence of what the World is all about is the above paragraph, even though it is self-contradictory. Our astronomy of the Cosmos is so primitive that I would say, we are at the stage of before Tycho Brahe of 16th century who was collecting data, and the above is just at the start of Tycho Brahe, so that along comes Kepler and Newton in the 17th century to put all the observed data together and to render to us our solar system. So the above Jarrett of the Cosmos is like the first set of data that Tycho Brahe found in the 16th century.
What is the Battery Model of the Cosmos? Remember, both the Battery and Generator models are Faraday Law.
The battery model is plates of metal separated by a fluid electrolyte that is in motion and for which that motion causes magnetic monopoles of the plates to be created. Instead of a thrusting bar magnet through a closed loop wire. We have a magnetic field by ions in motion creating monopoles on metal plates.
Since the Cosmos has a Great Attractor, and likely many Great Attractors as being a plate of a Cosmic Battery and the ions in fluid motion would be the many galaxies and their stars, in motion towards this plate.
Battery Model
______
| |
| |
|_____|
* *
*______
| |
| |
|_____|
* *
*______
| |
| |
|_____|
* *
*
So in the Battery picture of the Cosmos, the plates would be composed of many galaxies that form a ring, call it a Ring-Plate, such as the PP & PI described by Jarrett. And in between the ring-plate would be mobile independent galaxies moving towards a plate such as the Great Attractor plate.
The beauty of the Generator model, is that we actually do begin to see Cosmic Rings of Galaxies as the PP and PI. But the disadvantages of that model is galaxies have to form closed loops like a wire, and we do not perceive galaxies as wires, and Hund's rule and the muon would be huge, destroying a Earth if ever in its thrusting motion.
The beauty of the Battery model, is that we actually witnessed a Great Attractor, of the galaxies acting as Cosmic ions in motion towards the Attractor. Disadvantages, you need galaxies as metal plates, almost as if solid metal plates. You need some galaxies as ions as a fluid in motion.
Maybe the two models can come together and eliminate the weaknesses of one another.
AP
Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality
A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom.
____
.-' `-.
.' ::\ ::|:: /:: `.
/ ::\::|::/:: \
; _ _ ;
| ( O ) |
; - - ;
\ ::/::|::\:: /
`. ::/ ::|:: \:: .'
`- _____ .-'
One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law going on.
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
me (Archimedes Plutonium change)
Mar 5
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Subject: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE
textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the
Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's
magnetic monopole
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 22:35:21 +0000
update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole
On Monday, March 4, 2019 at 10:25:14 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Caltech’s Jarrett report of a cosmic ring is the start of modern day cosmology. Everything of cosmology observations of galaxy locations was rubbish fit for the trash can. And what science will now do is find more and more rings.
So I had to look up the date of Jarrett's mapping, and it appears to be March2004, almost exactly 15 years ago.
https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March04/Jarrett/Jarrett4.html
The third layer (0.01 < z < 0.02) is dominated by the P-P supercluster (left side of image) and the P-I supercluster extending up into the ZoA terminating as the Great Attractor region (notably Abell 3627) disappears behind a wall of Milky Way stars. An intriguing "ring" or chain of galaxies seems to circle/extend from the northern to the southern Galactic hemisphere (see also Figure 1). It is unknown whether this ring-like structure is real or a projection effect.
AP writes: what I am saying is that the mapping of the cosmos is all about ring structures. We must throw out Redshift as a distance measure. Once we throw that out, can we piece together all the galaxies to form successive Rings as in a torus shaped succession of Rings, for the Generator Model of the Cosmos. If however the Cosmos is a Battery model, then we have successive plates of rings.
There is probably someone in math that can take the galaxy mapping and put it into a computer modeling where you ask the computer to place all the galaxies into a succession of Rings.
AP
On Monday, March 4, 2019 at 8:50:20 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole
On Monday, March 4, 2019 at 4:35:24 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, March 4, 2019 at 10:25:14 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Caltech’s Jarrett report of a cosmic ring is the start of modern day cosmology. Everything of cosmology observations of galaxy locations was rubbish fit for the trash can. And what science will now do is find more and more rings.
>
> So I had to look up the date of Jarrett's mapping, and it appears to be March2004, almost exactly 15 years ago.
>
> https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March04/Jarrett/Jarrett4.html
> The third layer (0.01 < z < 0.02) is dominated by the P-P supercluster (left side of image) and the P-I supercluster extending up into the ZoA terminating as the Great Attractor region (notably Abell 3627) disappears behind a wall of Milky Way stars. An intriguing "ring" or chain of galaxies seems to circle/extend from the northern to the southern Galactic hemisphere (see also Figure 1). It is unknown whether this ring-like structure is real or a projection effect.
>
I was looking to see if I could compound some of those layers to produce a second ring.
Either I get rings for a Generator Model or rings for a Battery Model
On Monday, March 4, 2019 at 11:53:07 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole
https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March04/Jarrett/Figures/figure2.jpg
If i scoot galaxies around given position on x axis, but ignoring distance from redshift. I still make out 1 Ring.
AP
me (Archimedes Plutonium change)
Mar 5
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 09:12:33 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY
UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the
discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle
was Dirac's magnetic monopole
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 17:12:34 +0000
Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole
Yes, if i scoot Jarrett’s galaxy mapping only on the x-axis— figuring the position is correct and just the distance from redshift is in total error. What i end up with is not only a Ring but a sort of section of a cylinder with a hollow interior
A torus shape
Their is no denial of vast voids
But we scoot all the mass to be as close together and we end up with what can be described as a solid cylinder wall and hollow inside. Move the galaxies a bit apart and a Faraday Law coil appears.
AP
On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 3:45:24 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook
- show quoted text -
And we can colloborate that insight-- scooting over galaxy masses along the x-axis, by our relative position in the Milky Way Galaxy, that the other side of the galaxy in the x-axis would appear to have less mass.
What this suggests, is that the night sky of galaxies are arranged as a hollow cylinder or coil in Faraday Law.
AP
me (Archimedes Plutonium change)
Mar 7
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 18:51:50 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in
Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 02:51:50 +0000
Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook
- hide quoted text -
On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 4:46:53 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 3:45:24 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 11:12:38 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Yes, if i scoot Jarrett’s galaxy mapping only on the x-axis— figuring the position is correct and just the distance from redshift is in total error. What i end up with is not only a Ring but a sort of section of a cylinder with a hollow interior
> > >
> > > A torus shape
> > >
> > > Their is no denial of vast voids
> > >
> > > But we scoot all the mass to be as close together and we end up with what can be described as a solid cylinder wall and hollow inside. Move the galaxies a bit apart and a Faraday Law coil appears.
> > >
> >
> > And we can colloborate that insight-- scooting over galaxy masses along the x-axis, by our relative position in the Milky Way Galaxy, that the other side of the galaxy in the x-axis would appear to have less mass.
> >
> > What this suggests, is that the night sky of galaxies are arranged as a hollow cylinder or coil in Faraday Law.
> >
> >
>
> If I recall Earth is 3/4 from the center of Milky Way
What I am concerned about here is the obstruction of view of the night sky due to the placement of Earth in the Milky Way Galaxy.
AP
me (Archimedes Plutonium change)
Mar 8
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 18:14:01 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in
Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 02:14:01 +0000
Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook
On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 8:51:54 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> What I am concerned about here is the obstruction of view of the night sky due to the placement of Earth in the Milky Way Galaxy.
>
Yes, this is an excellent move forward. We cannot use the Redshift as any meaningful marker of anything. It is not distance, but more likely-- magnetic effects.
But what we can certainly rely upon is the relative placement or position of one galaxy to its surrounding neighbors and where it is positioned relative to Earth.
We can also place high faith in a "scooting of galaxies" along the x-axis, since we do not know their distance from us.
By scooting all the galaxies along the x-axis, what we notice is that they fill in a solid cylinder or a coil. A Faraday Law coil of the galaxies of the night sky.
So what Jarrett at CalTech noticed a Ring structure. It is safe to say there are many rings forming a Faraday Law coil.
AP
me (Archimedes Plutonium change)
1:55 PM (7 minutes ago)
On Friday, March 8, 2019 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook
Is there a name in math for this— scooting along x-axis when distance is unknown but position is accurate.
AP
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 11:46:47 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in
Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 19:46:48 +0000
Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook
On Friday, March 8, 2019 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Is there a name in math for this— scooting along x-axis when distance is unknown but position is accurate.
>
For once we scoot over the galaxies, we get them forming the surface of a cylinder or a coil of wire in Faraday Law.
AP
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-10 17:13 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <q63gkn$mt0$4@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #731058 |
AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science: >As we begin to properly find the true distance to galaxies the we see >more and more rings. Again, "we"? Seeing more and more rings? How did you teach your diseased cats to use telescopes? x-no-archive: yes
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web