Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #730029 > unrolled thread

Men are raped more often than women.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Men are raped more often than women. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-03-02 18:50 -0800
    Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-03 06:59 +0200
      Men are raped more often than women. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-03-03 02:11 -0800
        Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 11:32 -0500
          Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 09:35 -0700
            Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 11:43 -0500
              Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 09:48 -0700
                Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 12:08 -0500
                  Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:11 -0700
                  Re: Men are raped more often than women. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:13 +0000
                  Re: Men are raped more often than women. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-04 08:00 -0600
                    Re: Men are raped more often than women. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-04 08:39 -0600
                There will always be "rich" and "poor". Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-03-03 09:15 -0800
                  Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-03-03 09:21 -0800
                    Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:25 +0000
                      Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 12:29 -0500
                        Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:37 +0000
                        Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:56 -0700
                    SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-03-03 09:26 -0800
                      Re: SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:30 +0000
                      Re: SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:57 -0700
                        Re: SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 11:25 -0700
                          Re: SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 11:40 -0700
                  Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:58 -0700
                    Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 13:34 -0500
                      Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 18:57 +0000
                      Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-03 14:22 -0600
                        Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 16:08 -0500
                    Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 11:53 -0700
                Re: Men are raped more often than women. Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> - 2019-03-03 13:00 -0500
                  Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 13:35 -0500
                    Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 11:52 -0700
                      Re: Men are raped more often than women. Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> - 2019-03-03 19:59 -0500
                        Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-04 16:15 +0000
                    Re: Men are raped more often than women. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-03 14:23 -0600
                      Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 16:19 -0500
                      Re: Men are raped more often than women. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 19:44 -0500
                        Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-05 00:52 +0000
                        Re: Men are raped more often than women. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-05 10:21 -0600
                          Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-05 11:56 -0500
                          Re: Men are raped more often than women. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 17:00 -0500
                  Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 11:40 -0700
                Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-05 18:40 +0000
              Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:13 -0700
                Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 12:34 -0500
                  Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 10:55 -0700
                    Re: Men are raped more often than women. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 15:17 -0500
                      Re: Men are raped more often than women. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 14:45 -0700
      Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 10:18 -0500
        Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:31 +0000
          Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 10:53 -0500
        Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 10:35 -0800
        Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 19:59 +0000
          Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 13:03 -0700
          Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:29 -0600
      Re: Relf is severely delusional and a misogynist Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:27 -0600

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#730107 — Re: SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets.

On 3/3/19 10:26 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>> Looking in the mirror, SnitBot chants:
>>> Your whole argument is you should have special entitlements.
>>
>> See how much Snit hates rights ? He calls them "entitlements."
> 
> SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets.
> 

Notice how you lash out.

To me the goal of a conversation is more about reaching mutual 
understanding, learning, and finding where people agree and disagree. 
Your push for grade school insults does not interest me. Can you join me 
in my push for reasoned conversation?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730112 — Re: SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets.

On 2019-03-03 10:57 a.m., Snit wrote:
> On 3/3/19 10:26 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>> Looking in the mirror, SnitBot chants:
>>>> Your whole argument is you should have special entitlements.
>>>
>>> See how much Snit hates rights ? He calls them "entitlements."
>>
>> SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets.
>>
> 
> Notice how you lash out.
> 
> To me the goal of a conversation is more about reaching mutual 
> understanding, learning, and finding where people agree and disagree. 
> Your push for grade school insults does not interest me. Can you join me 
> in my push for reasoned conversation?
> 
hi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730122 — Re: SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets.

On 3/3/19 11:25 AM, % wrote:
> On 2019-03-03 10:57 a.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 3/3/19 10:26 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>>> Looking in the mirror, SnitBot chants:
>>>>> Your whole argument is you should have special entitlements.
>>>>
>>>> See how much Snit hates rights ? He calls them "entitlements."
>>>
>>> SnitBot is "entitled" to hard work, cleaning toilets.
>>>
>>
>> Notice how you lash out.
>>
>> To me the goal of a conversation is more about reaching mutual 
>> understanding, learning, and finding where people agree and disagree. 
>> Your push for grade school insults does not interest me. Can you join 
>> me in my push for reasoned conversation?
>>
> hi

Hello.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730108 — Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor".

On 3/3/19 10:15 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Looking in the mirror, SnitBot, chants:
>> Your whole argument is you should have special entitlements.
> 
> I don't care how you shuffle the deck,
> there will always be "rich" and "poor".

Is someone suggesting otherwise? If so, whom?

> Money is a stupid game anyways;
> no one really knows who's "rich" and "poor".
> A penniless man in Bangladesh might "richer" then Jeff Bezos.
> 


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730117 — Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor".

On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 10:58:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:


>Is someone suggesting otherwise? If so, whom?

Snit, go back to school. You should have typed,
"If so, who?"

As "who is" is implied and whom is the objective
form, whom is clearly incorrect.

HTH

-- 

Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730130 — Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor".

On 2019-03-03, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 10:58:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Is someone suggesting otherwise? If so, whom?
>
> Snit, go back to school. You should have typed,
> "If so, who?"
>
> As "who is" is implied and whom is the objective
> form, whom is clearly incorrect.
>
> HTH

Lol!
Snit's diploma mill degree strikes again.



-- 
Ratchet Jaw
The Locked and Loaded Jew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730146 — Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor".

On 3/3/2019 12:34 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 10:58:05 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Is someone suggesting otherwise? If so, whom?
> 
> Snit, go back to school. You should have typed,
> "If so, who?"
> 
> As "who is" is implied and whom is the objective
> form, whom is clearly incorrect.
> 

wrong, it should have been "If so, whom it is?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730153 — Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor".

On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 14:22:37 -0600, SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:

<...>

>wrong, it should have been "If so, whom it is?"

LOL, stick to Russian, Sergio.

-- 

Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730126 — Re: There will always be "rich" and "poor".

On 3/3/19 10:58 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 3/3/19 10:15 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> Looking in the mirror, SnitBot, chants:
>>> Your whole argument is you should have special entitlements.
>>
>> I don't care how you shuffle the deck,
>> there will always be "rich" and "poor".
> 
> Is someone suggesting otherwise? If so, whom?

Sir Gregory Hall responded to say he had no clue.

>> Money is a stupid game anyways;
>> no one really knows who's "rich" and "poor".
>> A penniless man in Bangladesh might "richer" then Jeff Bezos.
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730109

On 2019-03-03 11:48 a.m., Snit wrote:
> On 3/3/19 9:43 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 3/3/19 9:32 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 03 Mar 2019, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>>>> Kensi to me:
>>>>>>> Men are raped more often than women.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BullFUCKINGshit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Google it, if you can.
>>>>>
>>>>> " prison rape accounted for the majority of all rapes committed in 
>>>>> the US in 2008 ",
>>>>> according to The Justice Department.
>>>>>
>>>>> If Greg is right about rape, his libido just went up.
>>>>
>>>> It is completely natural and evolutionary-driven for
>>>> men to engage in rape. It's an expression of power
>>>> and dominance when it's man-on-man and, when it's
>>>> man-on-woman, it's an expression of power and
>>>> alpha male reproductive superiority.
>>>>
>>>> Humans are animals first and foremost so trying to
>>>> say/claim animals won't be animals is ludicrous.
>>>>
>>> Disagree, but at least you are honest about the conservative special
>>> entitlement world view. I give you credit for that.
>>
>> Special entitlement is a fact and is nothing to
>> be ashamed of, denied or swept under the rug
>> as is the typical liberal wont.
> 
> Your whole argument is you should have special entitlements.
> 
> And below you just rant. You offer no actual content of anything... just 
> lash out. Not really interested.

So stop replying to every single post if you're "not interested" you 
ridiculous piece of excrement.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730119

On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> wrote:
>On 2019-03-03, Snit wrote:

<...>

>> And below you just rant. You offer no actual content of anything... just 
>> lash out. Not really interested.
>
>So stop replying to every single post if you're "not interested" you 
>ridiculous piece of excrement.

LOL.  Snit gets no respect.

-- 

Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730125

On 3/3/19 11:35 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> wrote:
>> On 2019-03-03, Snit wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
>>> And below you just rant. You offer no actual content of anything... just
>>> lash out. Not really interested.
>>
>> So stop replying to every single post if you're "not interested" you
>> ridiculous piece of excrement.
> 
> LOL.  Snit gets no respect.
> 

If you do not respect evidence and reason and logic you will not respect 
me. I am OK with that.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730214

On 2019-03-03 1:52 p.m., Snit wrote:
> On 3/3/19 11:35 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> wrote:
>>> On 2019-03-03, Snit wrote:
>>
>> <...>
>>
>>>> And below you just rant. You offer no actual content of anything...
>>>> just
>>>> lash out. Not really interested.
>>>
>>> So stop replying to every single post if you're "not interested" you
>>> ridiculous piece of excrement.
>>
>> LOL.  Snit gets no respect.
>>
> 
> If you do not respect evidence and reason and logic you will not respect
> me. I am OK with that.
> 

Let's not forget that Snit is the ultimate authority on logic and reason
and that he doesn't waste time in reminding us all of that in every post
he makes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730314

Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> wrote:
> On 2019-03-03 1:52 p.m., Snit wrote:
>> On 3/3/19 11:35 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> wrote:
>>>> On 2019-03-03, Snit wrote:
>>> 
>>> <...>
>>> 
>>>>> And below you just rant. You offer no actual content of anything...
>>>>> just
>>>>> lash out. Not really interested.
>>>> 
>>>> So stop replying to every single post if you're "not interested" you
>>>> ridiculous piece of excrement.
>>> 
>>> LOL.  Snit gets no respect.
>>> 
>> 
>> If you do not respect evidence and reason and logic you will not respect
>> me. I am OK with that.
>> 
> 
> Let's not forget that Snit is the ultimate authority on logic and reason

Interesting that you see me that way. 

> and that he doesn't waste time in reminding us all of that in every post
> he makes.
> 
It is not a claim I have ever made. You just made it clear YOU see me that
way. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730147

On 3/3/2019 12:35 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> wrote:
>> On 2019-03-03, Snit wrote:
> 
> <...>
> 
>>> And below you just rant. You offer no actual content of anything... just 
>>> lash out. Not really interested.
>>
>> So stop replying to every single post if you're "not interested" you 
>> ridiculous piece of excrement.
> 
> LOL.  Snit gets no respect.
> 

  snit is only one letter away from shit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730156

On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 14:23:33 -0600, SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>On 3/3/2019 12:35 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> wrote:
>>> On 2019-03-03, Snit wrote:
>> 
>> <...>
>> 
>>>> And below you just rant. You offer no actual content of anything... just 
>>>> lash out. Not really interested.
>>>
>>> So stop replying to every single post if you're "not interested" you 
>>> ridiculous piece of excrement.
>> 
>> LOL.  Snit gets no respect.
>> 
>
>  snit is only one letter away from shit.

 . . . and snit by any other name still smells the same.

-- 

Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730414

On 3/3/2019 3:23 PM, SergIo wrote:
> On 3/3/2019 12:35 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> wrote:
>>> On 2019-03-03, Snit wrote:
>>
>> <...>
>>
>>>> And below you just rant. You offer no actual content of anything... just
>>>> lash out. Not really interested.
>>>
>>> So stop replying to every single post if you're "not interested" you
>>> ridiculous piece of excrement.
>>
>> LOL.  Snit gets no respect.
>>
> 
>    snit is only one letter away from shit.
> 
Actually science says Snit is actually MUCH closert to shit than that!
Just one little teeny tiny pen stroke away. All here are happy to 
volunteer to add the extra stroke anything we see his "handle".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730416

benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/3/2019 3:23 PM, SergIo wrote:
>> On 3/3/2019 12:35 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> wrote:
>>>> On 2019-03-03, Snit wrote:
>>> 
>>> <...>
>>> 
>>>>> And below you just rant. You offer no actual content of anything... just
>>>>> lash out. Not really interested.
>>>> 
>>>> So stop replying to every single post if you're "not interested" you
>>>> ridiculous piece of excrement.
>>> 
>>> LOL.  Snit gets no respect.
>>> 
>> 
>> snit is only one letter away from shit.
>> 
> Actually science says Snit is actually MUCH closert to shit than that!
> Just one little teeny tiny pen stroke away. All here are happy to 
> volunteer to add the extra stroke anything we see his "handle".
> 

Interesting how angry you get. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730514

On 3/4/2019 6:44 PM, benj wrote:
> On 3/3/2019 3:23 PM, SergIo wrote:
>> On 3/3/2019 12:35 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> wrote:
>>>> On 2019-03-03, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>> <...>
>>>
>>>>> And below you just rant. You offer no actual content of anything...
>>>>> just
>>>>> lash out. Not really interested.
>>>>
>>>> So stop replying to every single post if you're "not interested" you
>>>> ridiculous piece of excrement.
>>>
>>> LOL.  Snit gets no respect.
>>>
>>
>>    snit is only one letter away from shit.
>>
> Actually science says Snit is actually MUCH closert to shit than that!
> Just one little teeny tiny pen stroke away. All here are happy to
> volunteer to add the extra stroke anything we see his "handle".


agree, n is 90% of  h

so with 3 letters matching, he is 75% shit, and on the last letter with
a 25% weight per letter (1 out of 4 letters) and a 90% match on that,
then you get 25% + 25% + 25% +25%*90% = 97.5% shit!

   *we have proven that snit is 97.5% shit*.



also n and h are adjacent on the keyboard...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730519

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 10:21:21 -0600, SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>On 3/4/2019 6:44 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 3/3/2019 3:23 PM, SergIo wrote:
>>> On 3/3/2019 12:35 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, Andr-o-Mat <andr@o.mat> wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-03-03, Snit wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <...>
>>>>
>>>>>> And below you just rant. You offer no actual content of anything...
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> lash out. Not really interested.
>>>>>
>>>>> So stop replying to every single post if you're "not interested" you
>>>>> ridiculous piece of excrement.
>>>>
>>>> LOL.  Snit gets no respect.
>>>>
>>>
>>>    snit is only one letter away from shit.
>>>
>> Actually science says Snit is actually MUCH closert to shit than that!
>> Just one little teeny tiny pen stroke away. All here are happy to
>> volunteer to add the extra stroke anything we see his "handle".
>
>
>agree, n is 90% of  h
>
>so with 3 letters matching, he is 75% shit, and on the last letter with
>a 25% weight per letter (1 out of 4 letters) and a 90% match on that,
>then you get 25% + 25% + 25% +25%*90% = 97.5% shit!
>
>   *we have proven that snit is 97.5% shit*.
>
>
>also n and h are adjacent on the keyboard...

A good case may be made for "snot" as well.
One letter different and side-by-side on the
keyboard.

Also the content of "snot's" posts are better 
wrapped in a Kleenex or toilet paper.

Snot serves as a good example of a bad example.
He thoroughly exposes the illogic of liberalism 
yet he claims to so logical and intelligent. 

-- 

Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web