Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #730024 > unrolled thread

pages1 &2, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  pages1 &2, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by  Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 18:17 -0800
    pages1 &2, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by  Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 10:32 -0800
      page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:59 -0800
        Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 06:50 +0000
        page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 08:25 -0800
          Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 16:38 +0000
          update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 14:35 -0800
            Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 22:45 +0000
            Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 18:50 -0800
              Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 21:53 -0800
                Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 09:12 -0800
                  Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 17:27 +0000
                  Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 13:45 -0800
                    Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-05 21:55 +0000
                    Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 14:46 -0800
                      Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 18:51 -0800
                        Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-07 18:14 -0800
                          Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-08 19:19 -0800
                            Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-09 11:46 -0800
                              Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-10 17:08 +0000
                              Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 14:43 -0700
                                Does Faraday law have an inverse where: thrusting bar magnet near a prism with photons moving through has a offsetting motion Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 16:52 -0700
                                  experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 18:02 -0700
                                    experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 18:13 -0700
                                      Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-11 02:20 +0000
                                      Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 19:58 -0700
                                        Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 21:22 -0700
                                          Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-11 12:11 -0700
                                            Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-11 14:03 -0700
                                              Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-11 20:58 -0700
                                                Re: Sanyo TV screen replicates redshift of galaxies Re: experiment where i get more redshift than what i should get Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-12 11:51 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 00:47 +0000

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#730024 — pages1 &2, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 22:30:26 -0800 (PST)

Subject: page1, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by
 Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 06:30:27 +0000

page1, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition 

PHYSICS: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition   

Preface: a textbook and reference book to use in College sophomore physics course. There is so much fake science in the world of today-- Big Bang, black holes, General Relativity, superconductor theory, what is the proton and electron, the Bohr model of atom, quark theory, string theory, Standard Model of Physics Particles, how the Sun shines, and on and on and on. So much fake science, that I had to write this as a textbook. Why, gosh, golly, Old Physics could not even understand Angular Momentum properly ever since Newton discovered it in the 17th century, and without a proper understanding of angular momentum by 1897 JJ Thomson found a particle of .5MeV and the rest of the 20th century was so deluded with angular momentum that they thought a H2 molecule was bonded together by a proton of 938MeV to electron of .5MeV, and here the physics community of 1897 to 2017 is looking for nonsense they call dark matter, dark energy, while they cannot even get correct what the true real electron is, is in fact the muon at 105MeV and the true proton is 840MeV. So the entire physics education system around the world is all screwed up. I offer a solution to fix this messed-up-physics of old, a solution gameplan for physics education. 

So what I am going to do is write this textbook Atom Totality as a sophomore college textbook, and what I want it to serve also as the Reference or Encyclopedia function for all physics textbooks including the High School and College Freshman physics texts. Let this Atom Totality text be the guiding physics texts for all physics classes. So that we stop teaching fakery physics such as Big Bang, black holes, quark, string, Bohr atom, Standard Model, gravity as not EM, general-relativity, Bardeen Cooper Schrieffer superconductivity, dark matter, dark energy, and the huge long list of physics fakery. 

What I propose is that High School Physics be almost like teaching first year electricity of electricity and magnetism much like what a electrician learns in the first year. Since most of physics is just electricity and magnetism, have High School physics be a electricity teaching. And a book like the Time Life series on electricity, teaching Ohm's law, and doing several of the experiments like Faraday's law, like Oersted's law, like Ampere's law. So have High School Physics much like teaching electricians, and teaching about electricity and magnetism. 

Then for College Freshman, what needs to be taught is all the various subjects like electricity-magnetism, heat, mechanics, light and sound, only have all or most of trigonometry removed, and have all negative numbers removed. Remove -1 and all negative numbers out of physics and math and realize the principle of math that you can subtract, but never subtract from more than what is available and fakery such as negative area, negative volume, negative speed, negative mass. Basically Freshman college physics is -- What there is in Physics, and the units of physics. Here a refurbished History of Physics by Asimov maybe appropriate, but only after serious editing. Here also I am thinking of taking an old edition of Halliday & Resnick and refurbishing it. The 1980s editions, removing all the Big Bang and black hole garbage if it had any (that is why I go back to the 1980s, when physics was not so corrupted by kook physics). Go back to an old Halliday & Resnick and refurbish it for modern day. Remove the hideous trigonometry garbage and negative number garbage, and try to have only polynomial equations in physics such as F(x) = 2x^2 +4x - 8. Math that is 1st quadrant only math, no negative numbers. So freshman college physics is get acquainted with the Topics of physics and the Units of physics, units such as Force = mass*acceleration, and acceleration = distance/time^2. 

Sadly, education of the sciences has become a big business money grub affair, and almost divorced completely from the truth and reality of science. Imagination run amok where sensationalism is pandered off as being physics, and earns the money and clutters the magazines and newspapers with just horrid nonsense science fiction. Physics students these days talking of black holes and dark matter and dark energy is no better than in Massachusetts in the 1700s talking of witches, hobgoblins and ghosts. 

High School Physics-- a textbook that primarily speaks to electricity and magnetism, like as if, an introduction to being a electrician. Physics is a unified theory as electricity and magnetism, so you cannot go wrong if you teach starting out students electricity and magnetism for their first year of school learning physics. 

Freshman College physics-- a history of physics and learn the broad basic topics of physics, no trigonometry, no negative numbers, use Calculus in 1st quadrant only with polynomials and learn well the UNITS of physics-- speed, acceleration, force, angular momentum, energy etc. One can say, Freshman physics in College is learning the history, the topics and Units of physics. And it is about time we remove all pathetic past units that no longer are clear but rather obfuscating. Trash-can many units as joule, ergs, calorie, BTU, clear the deck and have only eV electron volt. Most physicists of today do not know that the forces of physics are already unified into one force= EM, and thus, all these worthless piddle paddle nonsense of hundreds of units does shame and dishonor to science. 

Sophomore College physics-- the Atom Totality textbook. 
--- end of proposed gameplan of physics education --- 

Everything in the world is Physics, or a derivative of physics. Because the world is made up of only atoms, including the universe itself. Since the only things that exist are atoms, means every thing comes from atom structure. 

In this textbook we talk mostly about Physics, but sometimes we do Chemistry and Astronomy. And sometimes we do Logic and mathematics. 

So what is Physics compared to Logic, compared to Mathematics? Well both Logic and mathematics are a part of physics. Physics is the king of all subjects, and Logic and mathematics are aides or helpers to physics. 

Physics is about the structure and mechanics of atoms. While Logic is the mechanics of "ideas". Ideas formed from sentences of language or sentences of mathematics. What is mathematics? Mathematics is the mechanics of numbers and the mechanics of geometry shapes. Mathematics exists only because Physics atoms are many and numerous, thus, creating numbers, and atoms have geometry shapes causing geometry to exist. 

If any student has taken Archimedes Plutonium's Teaching True Mathematics textbook will greatly aid the student in all the math presented in this book. 

I am going to write this textbook for the sophomore College student, and sometimes I will be speaking to the teacher. 

Let us get started. 


Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality 

                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                   ( O ) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And 
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and 
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics 
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law going on. 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.   
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium



page2, Generator picture; PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by
 Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition

On Saturday, February 23, 2019 at 1:49:23 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

Re: Page2: AtomTotality, 9th ed

I need a new picture of how galaxies are part of a cosmic muon or cosmic proton. I have the one Caltech report that galaxies form a cosmic ring. Which is a good lead, but i need more. 

On Saturday, February 23, 2019 at 1:43:14 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 

> Alright i am having trouble getting started here. From 1990 to 2019 i had no difficulty with a picture of the 231Pu Atom Totality for the dots of the electron dot cloud, each dot represented a chunk of matter of astronomy. A small dot could be a asteroid, larger dot a planet, larger yet a star and very very large dots are galaxies, and all these dots being the last valence electrons of 231Pu. 

> 

> But in 2017 i made a new discovery, my second best and most famous discovery— that the real proton of atoms is 840MeV not 938MeV and the real electron of atoms was 105MeV the muon, not .5MeV which the .5MeV is Dirac’s magnetic monopole. This great discovery changes not only physics but all the other sciences, changes all of them in a major way. 

> 

> And it leaves me with having to remake the picture of how the interior of atoms is structured, built, and works. No longer can i say dots of the electron dot cloud and are the galaxies of the night sky. I need a entirely new picture. 

> 

page2 Generator picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole

Starting in the early 1990s I drew a picture of the 5f6 of plutonium using Schrodinger Equation, and the ascii of it became this.

Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon 

                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 

One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And 
each dot represents another galaxy. 

And it made sense with the night sky that the pattern of stars and galaxies seemed to be haphazard dots of white light. And I thought it was a electron dot cloud pattern, so I used that picture for decades, from 1993 to 2019. Then in 2017 I had the inspiration that the real true electron was the muon, afterall, not the .5MeV particle JJ Thomson discovered in 1897. Then in 2018, the fallout of that discovery just kept coming and coming and coming, so that the Sun and stars do not shine from fusion, no, but shine from Faraday's law going on inside of atoms. That the muon was thrusting through a proton coil and producing magnetic monopoles that are stored in neutrons or emitted as radiation by the Sun or stars.

So what was once a rather static picture of the cosmos as


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
Was going to have to take a hit of a big change. I could not say the dots of the electron cloud represent galaxies, for the muon is a bar magnet in Faradays law, plunging through the windings of a proton at 840MeV and so where the electron dot cloud now becomes a bar magnet. This means the galaxies must be dots of the proton dot cloud.

But that leaves an ugly prospect that the cosmic 6 muons of 231Pu are some huge massive objects thrusting through the night sky. One relief of that prospect is to think of the muon as a dot cloud ring itself thrusting through proton rings of 8 windings.


Where the protons form torus rings and has the muons inside as bar magnets thrusting and creating magnetic monopoles (electricity). And we actually do have some astronomy evidence of a cosmic ring of galaxies.

--- quoting --- 
http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/papers/LSS/ 
The third layer (0.01 < z < 0.02) is dominated by the P-P 
supercluster 
 (left side of image) and the P-I supercluster extending up into the 
 ZoA terminating as the Great Attractor region (notably Abell 3627) 
 disappears behind a wall of Milky Way stars. An intriguing "ring" or 
 chain of galaxies seems to circle/extend from the northern to the 
 southern Galactic hemisphere (see also Figure 1). It is unknown 
 whether this ring-like structure is physically associated with the 
 cosmic web or an artifact of projection. 
--- end quoting --- 

What I would like to see happen is reports of more cosmic rings, rings together or nearby one another to substantiate the idea of windings of a cosmic proton.

But there are two possible means of doing the Faraday Law-- the generator type of thrusting bar magnet through closed loops, and the second type is a battery configuration of plates separated by a ion fluid.

So I have two choices, the cosmos is a generator type or is a battery type. With the generator type I run into the problem of the muon being unworldly huge as we are a planet stuck in the walls of a torus proton, and if that muon thrusts anywhere near us, would end Earth. Or the battery choice, that the muon is dot cloud of a cosmic ion liquid and the protons and neutrons are plates of a battery.

With the scant evidence from astronomy so far, I am going to choose the Proton dot cloud as windings of a coil and for the muons I am going to make them dot clouds of 1 winding and acting as bar magnet.

So if astronomers happen to see another ring of galaxies where it looks like the entire ring is passing on through or passing by another ring of galaxies, would be supporting evidence of the generator model.

So this is the best picture I can do for the moment. Based on astronomy evidence, and based on notions of Faraday Law and chemistry of orbitals. So think of this picture not fixed for years or decades but think of it as a working model, and easily changed by any new news or by insights.

So, my picture is temporary, it is the best I can think of at the moment. It can change any day. But I need a picture and so, this is the best I have so far. I even consulted with knowledge on the electric eel, its body design. For I would think the atom is so engineered as to produce Maximum Electricity as its goal. And so, how does a atom achieve maximum electricity? Is it the generator model or the battery model?

So, let the reader beware, this picture is temporary and may change drastically at any future time, even before I get to the end of this edition of 2019. But I need a picture and this is the best I have for the moment.


Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality 

                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                   ( O ) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And 
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and 
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law going on.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.   
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#730115

What is interesting here is that cosmology was only borne when Jarrett at Caltech noticed a cosmic ring of galaxies, and before that cosmology was just a waste dump of error.

As we begin to properly find the true distance to galaxies the we see more and more rings.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730246 — page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole

page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole


However, there is the other picture of the Universe, we must consider. Instead of the Generator of thrusting bar magnet, the Battery picture of the universe. We have one piece of evidence for the Generator picture in Jarrett's ring. However, within that same observation is mentioned the Great Attractor. And a battery is a great attractor of the fluid ions (magnetic monopoles). Could we have had a electric creature like the electric eel that lived on dry land without being immersed in a fluid? The electric eel is a great example of a electric generator via battery.


--- quoting --- 
http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/papers/LSS/ 
The third layer (0.01 < z < 0.02) is dominated by the P-P 
supercluster 
 (left side of image) and the P-I supercluster extending up into the 
 ZoA terminating as the Great Attractor region (notably Abell 3627) 
 disappears behind a wall of Milky Way stars. An intriguing "ring" or 
 chain of galaxies seems to circle/extend from the northern to the 
 southern Galactic hemisphere (see also Figure 1). It is unknown 
 whether this ring-like structure is physically associated with the 
 cosmic web or an artifact of projection. 
--- end quoting --- 

That paragraph by Jarrett is very vague, for it does not tell me if the Great Attractor is in P-P or P-I or did he mean to say in both. Remember in logic: Either..Or..Or.. Both is a contradiction of Boole Logic and here Jarrett is using a contradiction.

But Astronomy as of 2019 is primitive, very primitive, for our first bits of evidence of what the World is all about is the above paragraph, even though it is self-contradictory. Our astronomy of the Cosmos is so primitive that I would say, we are at the stage of before Tycho Brahe of 16th century who was collecting data, and the above is just at the start of Tycho Brahe, so that along comes Kepler and Newton in the 17th century to put all the observed data together and to render to us our solar system. So the above Jarrett of the Cosmos is like the first set of data that Tycho Brahe found in the 16th century.

What is the Battery Model of the Cosmos? Remember, both the Battery and Generator models are Faraday Law.

The battery model is plates of metal separated by a fluid electrolyte that is in motion and for which that motion causes magnetic monopoles of the plates to be created. Instead of a thrusting bar magnet through a closed loop wire. We have a magnetic field by ions in motion creating monopoles on metal plates.

Since the Cosmos has a Great Attractor, and likely many Great Attractors as being a plate of a Cosmic Battery and the ions in fluid motion would be the many galaxies and their stars, in motion towards this plate.


Battery Model
______
|          |
|          |
|_____|
    *   *
       *______
        |          |
        |          |
        |_____|
           *   *
             *______
              |          |
              |          |
              |_____|
                 *   *
                   *

So in the Battery picture of the Cosmos, the plates would be composed of many galaxies that form a ring, call it a Ring-Plate, such as the PP & PI described by Jarrett. And in between the ring-plate would be mobile independent galaxies moving towards a plate such as the Great Attractor plate.

The beauty of the Generator model, is that we actually do begin to see Cosmic Rings of Galaxies as the PP and PI. But the disadvantages of that model is galaxies have to form closed loops like a wire, and we do not perceive galaxies as wires, and Hund's rule and the muon would be huge, destroying a Earth if ever in its thrusting motion.

The beauty of the Battery model, is that we actually witnessed a Great Attractor, of the galaxies acting as Cosmic ions in motion towards the Attractor. Disadvantages, you need galaxies as metal plates, almost as if solid metal plates. You need some galaxies as ions as a fluid in motion.

Maybe the two models can come together and eliminate the weaknesses of one another.

AP


Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality 

A torus shape doing the Faraday Law inside of each and every atom.
                 __  
       .-'               `-.       
   .'     ::\ ::|:: /::  `.
 /        ::\::|::/::       \               
;             _ _             ; 
|            ( O )            |      
;               - -             ;
 \         ::/::|::\::        /       
   `.     ::/ ::|:: \::     .'              
      `-    _____   .-' 
      
One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And 
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and 
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law going on.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.   
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730257 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>So I like to see a whole entire page with nothing but.

>You cannot subtract more than what is available. No negative numbers exist.
>You cannot subtract more than what is available. No negative numbers exist.
>You cannot subtract more than what is available. No negative numbers exist.
>You cannot subtract more than what is available. No negative numbers exist.
>.
>.
>.

WARNING TO PARENTS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to teach your children
his broken math. BEWARE! He will corrupt the minds of your children! He
teaches there are no negative numbers, no complex numbers, he teaches a
sine wave isn't a sine wave plus many, many other instances of bad math.
In addition, he loves to teach false Boolean logic such as 3 AND 2 = 5.
His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a false
statement that nobody believes, such as 3 OR 2 = 5, say that it is false,
but then he'll try to replace it with another similar false statement such
as 3 AND 2 = 5, in order to really confuse future computer scientists.
In addition, he appears to be resorting to BRAINWASHING attempts by
needless repetition of his lies.

Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of children like this.
Perhaps he wants everyone to be a failure at math, just like he is.
Perhaps he is an agent of Putin and Russia, or maybe of China, in order
to make sure they will continue to dominate the trade economy. But the
point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you his dangerous book!

In addition, Plutonium wants to usurp good Christians by trying to convince
students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god.


x-no-archive: yes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730318 — page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole

Caltech’s Jarrett report of a cosmic ring is the start of modern day cosmology. Everything of cosmology observations of galaxy locations was rubbish fit for the trash can. And what science will now do is find more and more rings.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730323 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>I am pretty sure i neednot even have to prove all solutions of Generalized 

WARNING TO PARENTS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to teach your children
his broken math. BEWARE! He will corrupt the minds of your children! He
teaches there are no negative numbers, no complex numbers, he teaches a
sine wave isn't a sine wave plus many, many other instances of bad math.
In addition, he loves to teach false Boolean logic such as 3 AND 2 = 5.
His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a false
statement that nobody believes, such as 3 OR 2 = 5, say that it is false,
but then he'll try to replace it with another similar false statement such
as 3 AND 2 = 5, in order to really confuse future computer scientists.

Also, Plutonium is known to attempt to Brainwash young children by including
several pages of nothing except one of his lies repeated over and over.

Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of children like this.
Perhaps he wants everyone to be a failure at math, just like he is.
Perhaps he is an agent of Putin and Russia, or maybe of China, in order
to make sure they will continue to dominate the trade economy. But the
point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you his dangerous book!

In addition, Plutonium wants to usurp good Christians by trying to convince
students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god. You can recognize
the symbol of this evil pagan cult, which is an ascii-art cosmic butthole.




x-no-archive: yes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730391 — update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole

On Monday, March 4, 2019 at 10:25:14 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Caltech’s Jarrett report of a cosmic ring is the start of modern day cosmology. Everything of cosmology observations of galaxy locations was rubbish fit for the trash can. And what science will now do is find more and more rings.

So I had to look up the date of Jarrett's mapping, and it appears to be March2004, almost exactly 15 years ago.

https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March04/Jarrett/Jarrett4.html
The third layer (0.01 < z < 0.02) is dominated by the P-P supercluster (left side of image) and the P-I supercluster extending up into the ZoA terminating as the Great Attractor region (notably Abell 3627) disappears behind a wall of Milky Way stars. An intriguing "ring" or chain of galaxies seems to circle/extend from the northern to the southern Galactic hemisphere (see also Figure 1). It is unknown whether this ring-like structure is real or a projection effect. 

AP writes: what I am saying is that the mapping of the cosmos is all about ring structures. We must throw out Redshift as a distance measure. Once we throw that out, can we piece together all the galaxies to form successive Rings as in a torus shaped succession of Rings, for the Generator Model of the Cosmos. If however the Cosmos is a Battery model, then we have successive plates of rings.

There is probably someone in math that can take the galaxy mapping and put it into a computer modeling where you ask the computer to place all the galaxies into a succession of Rings.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730393 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>So I had to look up the date of Jarrett's mapping, and it appears to be

WARNING TO PARENTS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to teach your children
his broken math. BEWARE! He will corrupt the minds of your children! He
teaches there are no negative numbers, no complex numbers, he teaches a
sine wave isn't a sine wave plus many, many other instances of bad math.
In addition, he loves to teach false Boolean logic such as 3 AND 2 = 5.
His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a false
statement that nobody believes, such as 3 OR 2 = 5, say that it is false,
but then he'll try to replace it with another similar false statement such
as 3 AND 2 = 5, in order to really confuse future computer scientists.

Also, Plutonium is known to attempt to Brainwash young children by including
several pages of nothing except one of his lies repeated over and over.

Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of children like this.
Perhaps he wants everyone to be a failure at math, just like he is.
Perhaps he is an agent of Putin and Russia, or maybe of China, in order
to make sure they will continue to dominate the trade economy. But the
point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you his dangerous book!

In addition, Plutonium wants to usurp good Christians by trying to convince
students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god. You can recognize
the symbol of this evil pagan cult, which is an ascii-art cosmic butthole.

x-no-archive: yes 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730443 — Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole

On Monday, March 4, 2019 at 4:35:24 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, March 4, 2019 at 10:25:14 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Caltech’s Jarrett report of a cosmic ring is the start of modern day cosmology. Everything of cosmology observations of galaxy locations was rubbish fit for the trash can. And what science will now do is find more and more rings.
> 
> So I had to look up the date of Jarrett's mapping, and it appears to be March2004, almost exactly 15 years ago.
> 
> https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March04/Jarrett/Jarrett4.html
> The third layer (0.01 < z < 0.02) is dominated by the P-P supercluster (left side of image) and the P-I supercluster extending up into the ZoA terminating as the Great Attractor region (notably Abell 3627) disappears behind a wall of Milky Way stars. An intriguing "ring" or chain of galaxies seems to circle/extend from the northern to the southern Galactic hemisphere (see also Figure 1). It is unknown whether this ring-like structure is real or a projection effect. 
> 

I was looking to see if I could compound some of those layers to produce a second ring.

Either I get rings for a Generator Model or rings for a Battery Model

> AP writes: what I am saying is that the mapping of the cosmos is all about ring structures. We must throw out Redshift as a distance measure. Once we throw that out, can we piece together all the galaxies to form successive Rings as in a torus shaped succession of Rings, for the Generator Model of the Cosmos. If however the Cosmos is a Battery model, then we have successive plates of rings.
> 
> There is probably someone in math that can take the galaxy mapping and put it into a computer modeling where you ask the computer to place all the galaxies into a succession of Rings.
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730463 — Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole

https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March04/Jarrett/Figures/figure2.jpg

If i scoot galaxies around given position on x axis, but ignoring distance from redshift. I still make out 1 Ring.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730523 — Re: update Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition with the discovery the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole

Yes, if i scoot Jarrett’s galaxy mapping only on the x-axis— figuring the position is correct and just the distance from redshift is in total error. What i end up with is not only a Ring but a sort of section of a cylinder with a hollow interior

A torus shape

Their is no denial of vast voids

But we scoot all the mass to be as close together and we end up with what can be described as a solid cylinder wall and hollow inside. Move the galaxies a bit apart and a Faraday Law coil appears.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730530 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>AP writes: Moroney round the clock stalking 

So that's what you are doing by spamming that "song"?  You are stalking me 
around the clock? 





x-no-archive: yes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730561 — Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook

On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 11:12:38 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Yes, if i scoot Jarrett’s galaxy mapping only on the x-axis— figuring the position is correct and just the distance from redshift is in total error. What i end up with is not only a Ring but a sort of section of a cylinder with a hollow interior
> 
> A torus shape
> 
> Their is no denial of vast voids
> 
> But we scoot all the mass to be as close together and we end up with what can be described as a solid cylinder wall and hollow inside. Move the galaxies a bit apart and a Faraday Law coil appears.
> 

And we can colloborate that insight-- scooting over galaxy masses along the x-axis, by our relative position in the Milky Way Galaxy, that the other side of the galaxy in the x-axis would appear to have less mass.

What this suggests, is that the night sky of galaxies are arranged as a hollow cylinder or coil in Faraday Law.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730566 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>>But we scoot all the mass to be as close together and we end up with what

>And we can colloborate that insight-- scooting over galaxy masses along the

"We" again, Archie? Your diseased cats have opinions on astronomy as well?




x-no-archive: yes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730585 — Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook

On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 3:45:24 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 11:12:38 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Yes, if i scoot Jarrett’s galaxy mapping only on the x-axis— figuring the position is correct and just the distance from redshift is in total error. What i end up with is not only a Ring but a sort of section of a cylinder with a hollow interior
> > 
> > A torus shape
> > 
> > Their is no denial of vast voids
> > 
> > But we scoot all the mass to be as close together and we end up with what can be described as a solid cylinder wall and hollow inside. Move the galaxies a bit apart and a Faraday Law coil appears.
> > 
> 
> And we can colloborate that insight-- scooting over galaxy masses along the x-axis, by our relative position in the Milky Way Galaxy, that the other side of the galaxy in the x-axis would appear to have less mass.
> 
> What this suggests, is that the night sky of galaxies are arranged as a hollow cylinder or coil in Faraday Law.
> 
> 

If I recall Earth is 3/4 from the center of Milky Way

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730619 — Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook

On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 4:46:53 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 3:45:24 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 11:12:38 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Yes, if i scoot Jarrett’s galaxy mapping only on the x-axis— figuring the position is correct and just the distance from redshift is in total error. What i end up with is not only a Ring but a sort of section of a cylinder with a hollow interior
> > > 
> > > A torus shape
> > > 
> > > Their is no denial of vast voids
> > > 
> > > But we scoot all the mass to be as close together and we end up with what can be described as a solid cylinder wall and hollow inside. Move the galaxies a bit apart and a Faraday Law coil appears.
> > > 
> > 
> > And we can colloborate that insight-- scooting over galaxy masses along the x-axis, by our relative position in the Milky Way Galaxy, that the other side of the galaxy in the x-axis would appear to have less mass.
> > 
> > What this suggests, is that the night sky of galaxies are arranged as a hollow cylinder or coil in Faraday Law.
> > 
> > 
> 
> If I recall Earth is 3/4 from the center of Milky Way

What I am concerned about here is the obstruction of view of the night sky due to the placement of Earth in the Milky Way Galaxy.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730878 — Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook

On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 8:51:54 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 
> What I am concerned about here is the obstruction of view of the night sky due to the placement of Earth in the Milky Way Galaxy.
> 

Yes, this is an excellent move forward. We cannot use the Redshift as any meaningful marker of anything. It is not distance, but more likely-- magnetic effects.

But what we can certainly rely upon is the relative placement or position of one galaxy to its surrounding neighbors and where it is positioned relative to Earth.

We can also place high faith in a "scooting of galaxies" along the x-axis, since we do not know their distance from us.

By scooting all the galaxies along the x-axis, what we notice is that they fill in a solid cylinder or a coil. A Faraday Law coil of the galaxies of the night sky.

So what Jarrett at CalTech noticed a Ring structure. It is safe to say there are many rings forming a Faraday Law coil.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730998 — Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook

Is there a name in math for this— scooting along x-axis when distance is unknown but position is accurate.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#731052 — Re: Jarrett's mapping of cosmology galaxies is a coil or cylinder in Faraday Law Re: page3, Battery picture: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook

On Friday, March 8, 2019 at 9:20:00 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Is there a name in math for this— scooting along x-axis when distance is unknown but position is accurate.
> 

For once we scoot over the galaxies, we get them forming the surface of a cylinder or a coil of wire in Faraday Law.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#731159 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>For once we scoot over the galaxies, we get them forming the surface of a 
>cylinder or a coil of wire in Faraday Law.

"We" again, Archie? Could you explain how your diseased cats could have an
opinion on galaxies or the Faraday Law?


x-no-archive: yes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web