Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #729897 > unrolled thread

page1, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  page1, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 22:30 -0800
    Re: page1, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition Mutt Buncher <DognPolisher@hotmail.com> - 2019-03-02 15:29 -0800
    Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 00:55 +0000

#729897 — page1, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition

page1, PHYSICS: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition

PHYSICS: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2019, 9th edition  

Preface: a textbook and reference book to use in College sophomore physics course. There is so much fake science in the world of today-- Big Bang, black holes, General Relativity, superconductor theory, what is the proton and electron, the Bohr model of atom, quark theory, string theory, Standard Model of Physics Particles, how the Sun shines, and on and on and on. So much fake science, that I had to write this as a textbook. Why, gosh, golly, Old Physics could not even understand Angular Momentum properly ever since Newton discovered it in the 17th century, and without a proper understanding of angular momentum by 1897 JJ Thomson found a particle of .5MeV and the rest of the 20th century was so deluded with angular momentum that they thought a H2 molecule was bonded together by a proton of 938MeV to electron of .5MeV, and here the physics community of 1897 to 2017 is looking for nonsense they call dark matter, dark energy, while they cannot even get correct what the true real electron is, is in fact the muon at 105MeV and the true proton is 840MeV. So the entire physics education system around the world is all screwed up. I offer a solution to fix this messed-up-physics of old, a solution gameplan for physics education.

So what I am going to do is write this textbook Atom Totality as a sophomore college textbook, and what I want it to serve also as the Reference or Encyclopedia function for all physics textbooks including the High School and College Freshman physics texts. Let this Atom Totality text be the guiding physics texts for all physics classes. So that we stop teaching fakery physics such as Big Bang, black holes, quark, string, Bohr atom, Standard Model, gravity as not EM, general-relativity, Bardeen Cooper Schrieffer superconductivity, dark matter, dark energy, and the huge long list of physics fakery. 

What I propose is that High School Physics be almost like teaching first year electricity of electricity and magnetism much like what a electrician learns in the first year. Since most of physics is just electricity and magnetism, have High School physics be a electricity teaching. And a book like the Time Life series on electricity, teaching Ohm's law, and doing several of the experiments like Faraday's law, like Oersted's law, like Ampere's law. So have High School Physics much like teaching electricians, and teaching about electricity and magnetism. 

Then for College Freshman, what needs to be taught is all the various subjects like electricity-magnetism, heat, mechanics, light and sound, only have all or most of trigonometry removed, and have all negative numbers removed. Remove -1 and all negative numbers out of physics and math and realize the principle of math that you can subtract, but never subtract from more than what is available and fakery such as negative area, negative volume, negative speed, negative mass. Basically Freshman college physics is -- What there is in Physics, and the units of physics. Here a refurbished History of Physics by Asimov maybe appropriate, but only after serious editing. Here also I am thinking of taking an old edition of Halliday & Resnick and refurbishing it. The 1980s editions, removing all the Big Bang and black hole garbage if it had any (that is why I go back to the 1980s, when physics was not so corrupted by kook physics). Go back to an old Halliday & Resnick and refurbish it for modern day. Remove the hideous trigonometry garbage and negative number garbage, and try to have only polynomial equations in physics such as F(x) = 2x^2 +4x - 8. Math that is 1st quadrant only math, no negative numbers. So freshman college physics is get acquainted with the Topics of physics and the Units of physics, units such as Force = mass*acceleration, and acceleration = distance/time^2.

Sadly, education of the sciences has become a big business money grub affair, and almost divorced completely from the truth and reality of science. Imagination run amok where sensationalism is pandered off as being physics, and earns the money and clutters the magazines and newspapers with just horrid nonsense science fiction. Physics students these days talking of black holes and dark matter and dark energy is no better than in Massachusetts in the 1700s talking of witches, hobgoblins and ghosts. 

High School Physics-- a textbook that primarily speaks to electricity and magnetism, like as if, an introduction to being a electrician. Physics is a unified theory as electricity and magnetism, so you cannot go wrong if you teach starting out students electricity and magnetism for their first year of school learning physics.

Freshman College physics-- a history of physics and learn the broad basic topics of physics, no trigonometry, no negative numbers, use Calculus in 1st quadrant only with polynomials and learn well the UNITS of physics-- speed, acceleration, force, angular momentum, energy etc. One can say, Freshman physics in College is learning the history, the topics and Units of physics. And it is about time we remove all pathetic past units that no longer are clear but rather obfuscating. Trash-can many units as joule, ergs, calorie, BTU, clear the deck and have only eV electron volt. Most physicists of today do not know that the forces of physics are already unified into one force= EM, and thus, all these worthless piddle paddle nonsense of hundreds of units does shame and dishonor to science. 

Sophomore College physics-- the Atom Totality textbook. 
--- end of proposed gameplan of physics education ---

Everything in the world is Physics, or a derivative of physics. Because the world is made up of only atoms, including the universe itself. Since the only things that exist are atoms, means every thing comes from atom structure. 

In this textbook we talk mostly about Physics, but sometimes we do Chemistry and Astronomy. And sometimes we do Logic and mathematics. 

So what is Physics compared to Logic, compared to Mathematics? Well both Logic and mathematics are a part of physics. Physics is the king of all subjects, and Logic and mathematics are aides or helpers to physics. 

Physics is about the structure and mechanics of atoms. While Logic is the mechanics of "ideas". Ideas formed from sentences of language or sentences of mathematics. What is mathematics? Mathematics is the mechanics of numbers and the mechanics of geometry shapes. Mathematics exists only because Physics atoms are many and numerous, thus, creating numbers, and atoms have geometry shapes causing geometry to exist. 

If any student has taken Archimedes Plutonium's Teaching True Mathematics textbook will greatly aid the student in all the math presented in this book. 

I am going to write this textbook for the sophomore College student, and sometimes I will be speaking to the teacher. 

Let us get started. 


Very crude dot picture of 5f6 magnetosphere of 231Pu Atom Totality 

                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                   ( O ) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 

One of those dots in the magnetosphere is the Milky Way galaxy. And 
each dot represents another galaxy. The O is the Cosmic nucleus and 
certainly not as dense as what Old Physics thought because in New Physics
the interior of atoms has the Faraday law going on.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.   
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#729997

Shit post.

You've posted the same thing at least 4,000 times.

Give it a fucking rest.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730211 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>Yes, Moroney why are they Alzheimer stupid at Reed College over the ellipse???

Oh you really like seeing that ellipse proof! Here it is!

Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic 
sections are ellipses.

Some preliminaries:

Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used 
in the proof:

              ^ x
              |
             -+- <= x=h
         .'   |   `.
        .     |     .
        |     |     |
        '     |     '      
         `.   |   .'
 y <----------+ <= x=0
             
Cone (side view):
                 .
                /|\
               / | \
              /b |  \
             /---+---' <= x = h
            /    |'   \
           /   ' |     \
          / '    |      \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
        /    a   |        \

Proof:

r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x  and  d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x,  hence

y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1  ...equation of an ellipse

qed



x-no-archive: yes

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web