Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #726334 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-07 21:11 -0800 |
| Last post | 2019-02-11 23:49 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 117 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-07 21:11 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-08 16:54 +1100
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-07 22:08 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-08 17:14 +1100
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-07 22:35 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-08 08:07 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-02-08 10:07 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-08 13:18 -0500
Re: Matter doesn’t suck James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-02-08 10:06 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-02-08 12:30 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-02-08 09:42 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-08 11:16 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-02-08 12:32 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-08 13:23 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-08 16:21 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-02-08 15:50 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-09 22:45 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-08 19:29 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-08 11:35 -0800
Re: Re: Matter doesn’t suck moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-08 20:32 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-09 22:53 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-10 01:41 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-09 16:17 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-09 19:50 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-02-09 19:56 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 03:46 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 09:45 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 17:51 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 13:35 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-02-10 15:10 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 15:17 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 07:45 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 16:06 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-10 15:40 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 00:59 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 17:30 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:47 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 18:44 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 12:54 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-11 00:01 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-11 08:59 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 17:24 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 20:39 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 12:13 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-11 23:45 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 13:20 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-12 08:42 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 19:23 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 12:30 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-12 14:59 -0600
Re: Matter doesn’t suck mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-12 13:07 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 13:23 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-12 13:35 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 14:41 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 23:12 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 15:41 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 16:19 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 03:04 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 20:01 -0800
Re: Re: Matter doesn’t suck moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-13 06:14 +0000
Re: Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 08:49 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 22:46 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:18 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 03:12 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 02:52 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 19:02 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 12:12 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 22:24 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 11:40 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 19:42 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 13:03 -0700
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-17 17:48 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 02:15 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-18 21:13 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 13:52 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 10:08 -0500
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 15:15 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 16:07 -0500
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 13:54 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 17:26 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:22 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 03:04 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 20:11 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-12 20:57 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 11:22 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 04:30 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 05:16 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:41 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:30 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:41 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:41 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:41 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:41 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 14:44 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 07:09 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:58 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 16:06 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 09:14 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 22:46 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:03 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 23:15 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 15:23 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 14:04 +0000
Re: Re: Matter doesn’t suck moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-14 22:46 +0000
Re: Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 15:23 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:52 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 05:39 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-13 15:34 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 08:54 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 23:11 +0000
Re: Matter doesn’t suck poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-02-12 21:37 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-10 15:39 -0600
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-09 10:51 -0600
Re: Matter doesn’t suck mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-09 12:49 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-10 15:20 -0600
Re: Matter doesn’t suck mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-10 18:32 -0800
Re: Matter doesn’t suck Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 23:49 -0800
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-07 21:11 -0800 |
| Subject | Matter doesn’t suck |
| Message-ID | <bc1708bb-d512-4952-b6ed-eaf74dd930be@googlegroups.com> |
Why larger planets and stars appear ‘gaseous’: Matter does not autonomously ‘suck’. All matter gives off energy as its electrons accelerate around their nucleus at a large fraction of lightspeed. This energy ‘pushes’ them away from their own proton, even though their opposite charge (spin) tries to pull them against their proton. It’s a balance. All electrons are emitting this energy that resonates with and is absorbed by protons- so there is a pressure coming towards a body of matter from all directions in Space that is absorbed by the protons in that body. At the same time, the electrons in that body are putting out this same ‘push’. So, when a body is small, the incoming push is much larger than the outgoing push, and the absorption exactly reflects how many protons are there. But as the body gets larger, it can only absorb ALL of the incoming push from any one direction, and more and more of the matter is unseen, gravitationally. Also, it is emitting more and more of its OWN push. So larger planets and stars APPEAR to be much less massive than they are.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 16:54 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <gc4jtjFkt20U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #726334 |
On 8/02/2019 4:11 pm, john wrote: > Why larger planets and stars appear ‘gaseous’: > > Matter does not autonomously ‘suck’. > > All matter gives off energy as its electrons accelerate around their nucleus at a large fraction of lightspeed. > This energy ‘pushes’ them away from their own proton, even though their opposite charge (spin) tries to pull them against their proton. It’s a balance. > > All electrons are emitting this energy that resonates with and is absorbed by protons- so there is a pressure coming towards a body of matter from all directions in Space that is absorbed by the protons in that body. > > At the same time, the electrons in that body are putting out this same ‘push’. > > So, when a body is small, the incoming push is much larger than the outgoing push, and the absorption exactly reflects how many protons are there. But as the body gets larger, it can only absorb ALL of the incoming push from any one direction, and more and more of the matter is unseen, gravitationally. Also, it is emitting more and more of its OWN push. > > So larger planets and stars APPEAR to be much less massive than they are. > Are you really under the impression that this gibberish has some meaning? Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-07 22:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7a166277-9d64-4fe7-9f59-2431bc37b662@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726339 |
Sylvia “Are you really under the impression that this gibberish has some meaning? ” I guess, for you, singularities and point particles and curved space are easier to understand. To me, THEY are the gibberish. Different strokes. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 17:14 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <gc4l1oFl4n7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #726343 |
On 8/02/2019 5:08 pm, john wrote: > Sylvia > “Are you really under the impression that this gibberish has some meaning? ” > I guess, for you, singularities and point particles and curved space are easier to understand. To me, THEY are the gibberish. Different strokes. :) > The situation is not symmetrical. What you are writing is nonsense. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-07 22:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8dacf142-10f2-4761-8507-b59361371944@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726346 |
On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 8:14:20 AM UTC+2, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 8/02/2019 5:08 pm, john wrote: > > Sylvia > > “Are you really under the impression that this gibberish has some meaning? ” > > I guess, for you, singularities and point particles and curved space are easier to understand. To me, THEY are the gibberish. Different strokes. :) > > > > The situation is not symmetrical. What you are writing is nonsense. > > Sylvia. ========================= Sylvia I am not sure you are understanding about what you are talking even you seems to me just another common parrot!! it is a completely surprising different story !!! ================= ATB Y.P ===================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 08:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <870d1042-e2cf-49aa-bc72-1ec3c5d64a7b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726346 |
Sylvia “The situation is not symmetrical. What you are writing is nonsense. ” DM is nonsense. Suck gravity is nonsense. Point particles are nonsense. Singularities are nonsense. You believe in nonsense- so what’s the problem? They will call black white and white black...you’ve been flipped
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 10:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <454b224d-1767-4baf-b76f-8986af21de4c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726346 |
On Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 10:14:20 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 8/02/2019 5:08 pm, john wrote: > > Sylvia > > “Are you really under the impression that this gibberish has some meaning? ” > > I guess, for you, singularities and point particles and curved space are easier to understand. To me, THEY are the gibberish. Different strokes. :) > > > > The situation is not symmetrical. What you are writing is nonsense. > > Sylvia. What in the world are you talking about?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 13:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q3kh61$1ho6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #726346 |
On 2/8/2019 1:14 AM, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 8/02/2019 5:08 pm, john wrote: >> Sylvia >> “Are you really under the impression that this gibberish has some >> meaning? ” >> I guess, for you, singularities and point particles and curved space >> are easier to understand. To me, THEY are the gibberish. Different >> strokes. :) >> > > The situation is not symmetrical. What you are writing is nonsense. > > Sylvia. So do you think that mathematics is more real than reality? Do you understand there is a difference between mathematics (fantasy) and reality? John understands this but you apparently do not. Of course mathematics is not gibberish because it has structure, but neither is it reality. Pretending fantasy is reality is what is called liberal gibberish.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 10:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0461777a-53fb-4bba-859f-1aba1c9df88f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726339 |
On Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 9:55:03 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 8/02/2019 4:11 pm, john wrote: > > Why larger planets and stars appear ‘gaseous’: > > > > Matter does not autonomously ‘suck’. > > > > All matter gives off energy as its electrons accelerate around their nucleus at a large fraction of lightspeed. > > This energy ‘pushes’ them away from their own proton, even though their opposite charge (spin) tries to pull them against their proton. It’s a balance. > > > > All electrons are emitting this energy that resonates with and is absorbed by protons- so there is a pressure coming towards a body of matter from all directions in Space that is absorbed by the protons in that body. > > > > At the same time, the electrons in that body are putting out this same ‘push’. > > > > So, when a body is small, the incoming push is much larger than the outgoing push, and the absorption exactly reflects how many protons are there. But as the body gets larger, it can only absorb ALL of the incoming push from any one direction, and more and more of the matter is unseen, gravitationally. Also, it is emitting more and more of its OWN push. > > > > So larger planets and stars APPEAR to be much less massive than they are. > > > > Are you really under the impression that this gibberish has some meaning? > > Sylvia. Sylvia, why do you come to a science forum if you are incapable of discussing anything?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 12:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <65decf78-4ba4-4f96-84ef-817bb257b95e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726394 |
On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 10:06:12 AM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: > Sylvia, why do you come to a science forum if you are incapable of discussing anything? ... says the Biggest Dumbfuck on the forum...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 09:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <adb05943-ccf4-41ba-841b-90b6f2d11b53@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726334 |
On Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 9:12:00 PM UTC-8, john wrote: > Why larger planets and stars appear ‘gaseous’: > > Matter does not autonomously ‘suck’. > > All matter gives off energy as its electrons accelerate around their nucleus at a large fraction of lightspeed. > This energy ‘pushes’ them away from their own proton, even though their opposite charge (spin) tries to pull them against their proton. It’s a balance. > > All electrons are emitting this energy that resonates with and is absorbed by protons- so there is a pressure coming towards a body of matter from all directions in Space that is absorbed by the protons in that body. > > At the same time, the electrons in that body are putting out this same ‘push’. > > So, when a body is small, the incoming push is much larger than the outgoing push, and the absorption exactly reflects how many protons are there. But as the body gets larger, it can only absorb ALL of the incoming push from any one direction, and more and more of the matter is unseen, gravitationally. Also, it is emitting more and more of its OWN push. > > So larger planets and stars APPEAR to be much less massive than they are. Interesting. Let me ask a question. Do you think that gravity can be explained as a net effect of electrons? James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes Denk strikes again: https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-that-the-polarity-of-the-H2O-molecule-is-not-static-as-is-currently-assumed-but-highly-variable-as-described-in-the-link-below
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 11:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <df9d9d69-e49a-4120-a366-02cc4ff951e7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726387 |
James “Interesting. Let me ask a question. Do you think that gravity can be explained as a net effect of electrons? ” YES!! It’s a CYCLE just like how stars radiate until they run out of energy and can no longer keep from falling into the BH, and then their material is shredded into high energy ions and shot back out as jets. Electrons radiate the same way, their constituents repelling themselves from the charge attraction of their proton by that radiation and simultaneously sending this ‘proton resonating energy’ outward in all directions. Every body of matter is pushed on from all directions from every other body. There is a SET AMOUNT of energy coming in, and THAT’S ALL that can be absorbed by the protons in a body. Black Holes are impossible- what we see at galactic centers are vortices that spin so fast that they shred matter and spit it back out in a highly-energized state.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 12:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b3a62403-9a9b-4b98-a8c4-8c7a49f94dd4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726406 |
On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 11:16:49 AM UTC-8, john wrote: > James > “Interesting. Let me ask a question. Do you think that gravity can be explained as a net effect of electrons? > ” > YES!! > It’s a CYCLE just like how stars radiate until they run out of energy and can no longer keep from falling into the BH, and then their material is shredded into high energy ions and shot back out as jets. > > Electrons radiate the same way, their constituents repelling themselves from the charge attraction of their proton by that radiation and simultaneously sending this ‘proton resonating energy’ outward in all directions. > > Every body of matter is pushed on from all directions from every other body. There is a SET AMOUNT of energy coming in, and THAT’S ALL that can be absorbed by the protons in a body. > > Black Holes are impossible- what we see at galactic centers are vortices that spin so fast that they shred matter and spit it back out in a highly-energized state. Oh Boy, 2 kooks agreeing about something completely bizarre... no surprise about that!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 13:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f67b7401-ad40-4df8-921d-805718a88dbe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726415 |
penile “kooks agreeing about something completely bizarre... no surprise” Nothing kooky about black/white holes, alternate dimensions, point particles, virtual particles, dark matter, Science with uncertainty as a first principle “yup yup we can’t possibly figure it out yup yup so don’t expect us to yup yup just give us money yup yup” Hahaha
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 16:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <abae326e-65f5-4843-b462-19c18be4edc1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726419 |
On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 1:23:04 PM UTC-8, john wrote: > penile > “kooks agreeing about something completely bizarre... no surprise” > Nothing kooky about black/white holes, alternate dimensions, point particles, virtual particles, dark matter, Science with uncertainty as a first principle “yup yup we can’t possibly figure it out yup yup so don’t expect us to yup yup just give us money yup yup” > Hahaha If Quantum mechanics first of all is so uncertain why would its statistical order be important in any way? No. God creates gravity. Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 15:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5fcb9a8b-b3f0-4111-a093-65d23e138b40@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726415 |
On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 12:32:49 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 11:16:49 AM UTC-8, john wrote: > > James > > “Interesting. Let me ask a question. Do you think that gravity can be explained as a net effect of electrons? > > ” > > YES!! > > It’s a CYCLE just like how stars radiate until they run out of energy and can no longer keep from falling into the BH, and then their material is shredded into high energy ions and shot back out as jets. > > > > Electrons radiate the same way, their constituents repelling themselves from the charge attraction of their proton by that radiation and simultaneously sending this ‘proton resonating energy’ outward in all directions. > > > > Every body of matter is pushed on from all directions from every other body. There is a SET AMOUNT of energy coming in, and THAT’S ALL that can be absorbed by the protons in a body. > > > > Black Holes are impossible- what we see at galactic centers are vortices that spin so fast that they shred matter and spit it back out in a highly-energized state. > > Oh Boy, 2 kooks agreeing about something completely bizarre... no surprise about that! You got nothing!!! (Same as always.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty6@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-09 22:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9ce23a8e-0b37-4ab3-af79-3f0a80e0b4b9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726406 |
On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 9:16:49 PM UTC+2, john wrote: > James > “Interesting. Let me ask a question. Do you think that gravity can be explained as a net effect of electrons? > ” > YES!! > It’s a CYCLE just like how stars radiate until they run out of energy and can no longer keep from falling into the BH, and then their material is shredded into high energy ions and shot back out as jets. > > Electrons radiate the same way, their constituents repelling themselves from the charge attraction of their proton by that radiation and simultaneously sending this ‘proton resonating energy’ outward in all directions. > > Every body of matter is pushed on from all directions from every other body. ==================================== I agree with that ''pushed on from all directions ''!! see my new thread about ENIGMA SOLVED ' ==== TIA Y.Porat ======================== There is a SET AMOUNT of energy coming in, and THAT’S ALL that can be absorbed by the protons in a body. > > Black Holes are impossible- what we see at galactic centers are vortices that spin so fast that they shred matter and spit it back out in a highly-energized state.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 19:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q3klad$u23$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #726334 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >Matter does not autonomously 'suck'. That's right, John. You need to abandon your discredited LeSage suck gravity and learn from Einstein, or at least Newton, who taught how matter attracts other matter and the inverse square law. <babble babble word salad blithering> I see you had a very successful 'trip' to Little Pharma!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 11:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fb17db10-e159-4d4a-b371-36c3d1231eb8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #726407 |
MM “You need to abandon your discredited LeSage suck gravity ” You’re so out of it you don’t know the difference between suck and blow. What do you do- Big Pharma poison? Stop it- you’re rotting your brain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-08 20:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q3kp02$mdp$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #726411 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> lunges for the bait: >MM >"You need to abandon your discredited LeSage suck gravity " >You're so out of it you don't know the difference between >suck and blow. It is YOU who believes in "suck" gravity! Don't you claim gravity is from external forces pressing on objects? And if the pressure is unbalanced there is a force on the object? Now consider a straw in a glass of water. The water in the bottom of the straw doesn't move. Because air pressure on it is equal in all directions. Now you're thirsty so you SUCK on the straw. Now the pressure in the straw is less than the air pressure. Now the pressure on the water is unbalanced so it rises in the straw. The John Sefton "SUCK" theory of slaking one's thirst! So let's consider LeSage's "suck" gravity. He believed in "ultramundane corpuscles" pressing on objects from all directions. He also believed one object could block "corpuscles" from pressing on another object. Now the pressure on the second object is unbalanced, so the second object is SUCKED toward the first! Voila, suck gravity! " What do you do- Big Pharma poison? >Stop it- you're rotting your brain > Whoa! Blithering John "Word Salad" Sefton warning about rotting one's brain?? How hypocritical is that? Or perhaps "Big Pharma" really did rot your brain and this is why you babble word salad in here now? And you are warning others "Don't become a window licker like me! Big Pharma poisoned my brain so now all I can do is babble nonsense!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web