Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #723100 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-11 16:55 -0800 |
| Last post | 2019-01-19 15:12 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 114 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 16:55 -0800
Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-11 17:02 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-11 19:43 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-12 04:36 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 05:12 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 15:27 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 14:11 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-12 22:23 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-12 14:34 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 00:33 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 18:46 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 12:40 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 11:48 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 21:05 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 14:17 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 22:24 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 15:38 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-14 01:05 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 16:52 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 22:34 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 15:36 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 16:49 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-14 01:01 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-14 00:57 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 22:40 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-01-14 10:13 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-12 17:29 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-12 11:06 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-01-12 20:42 +0100
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-11 21:24 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 00:20 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-01-18 14:04 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-18 18:44 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-01-19 12:40 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 20:21 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2019-01-19 12:42 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Earle Jones <earledjones@icloud.com> - 2019-01-19 12:54 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-19 05:39 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 22:15 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-19 07:00 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 01:22 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:12 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-19 16:52 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 09:28 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-19 16:22 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 11:39 -0500
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-20 20:50 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 07:01 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 15:18 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-21 09:26 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 11:38 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-21 12:13 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 14:45 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-21 16:16 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 17:11 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-21 17:43 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 17:14 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-21 17:30 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-21 17:52 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-21 18:07 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-21 20:05 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-21 20:37 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 07:03 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 07:40 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 08:05 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 16:11 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 09:14 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 13:04 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-22 14:13 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 00:09 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-22 15:42 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 16:27 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-22 17:05 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 20:39 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-22 20:53 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 21:19 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 05:33 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 21:43 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-22 21:50 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 02:10 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 11:20 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-23 20:33 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 05:24 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 10:20 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 10:41 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-25 19:05 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-25 18:56 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 13:18 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:32 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-25 12:20 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 13:21 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:32 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-25 19:39 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:19 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 12:53 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 14:25 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2019-01-27 11:42 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 09:56 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-26 19:13 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 23:32 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-25 16:49 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-26 01:05 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-23 11:20 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-22 20:48 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-22 20:54 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-22 19:33 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-22 20:41 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 12:52 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 05:38 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-22 15:37 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-21 17:51 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 01:31 -0800
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-19 16:37 +0000
Re: Another RAPIDLY spinning black hole Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:12 +0000
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 11:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q29im2$fk9$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #724409 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > pnal > “No one can explain anything to you... but it is not because they are bad > at explaining, it is because you are bad at listening. ” > Well, you seem to be unable to hear anything that goes against your > beliefs, that’s for sure. “Since you refuse to explain it simply and plainly to me, at the level of a third grader, I’m just going to make up some shit, just because I know it goes against the mainstream beliefs. Maybe that will provoke you to try to explain it to me.” Get it yet, John? > Let’s take just ONE of the observations that supports my idea of galactic > precession- asymmetrical galactic rotation curves. > Explain it your way. Go for it. > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 20:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c2b6fd8d-e653-4a61-90af-8c45d6ab3eb9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724409 |
On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 2:10:18 AM UTC-8, john wrote: > Let’s take just ONE of the observations that supports my idea of galactic precession- asymmetrical galactic rotation curves. Sorry, John, your idea that asymmetrical galactic rotation curves support galactic precession is a non-starter. If you think I'm wrong, well, show your evidence. That's how science works. You have a 'new' idea, 'you' provide the supporting evidence. Well?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 05:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2119faf1-09d8-4d5b-8120-80d4a72b55a0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724516 |
pnal “Sorry, John, your idea that asymmetrical galactic rotation curves support galactic precession is a non-starter. If you think I'm wrong, well, show your evidence. “ It’s self-explanatory. Get your head out
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 10:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <98613aca-a3b6-4a4e-a64e-e6a6222c76b2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724604 |
https://resonance.is/wp-content/uploads/spinBH2.jpg Another black hole spinning. At over 90% of lightspeed. Surprise surprise
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 10:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5578ffa1-883d-43be-b180-262944c89b51@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724609 |
https://m.phys.org/news/2019-01-black-hole-galaxy-rapidly.html#jCp There you go
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 19:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2fmmj$odl$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #724609 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >https://resonance.is/wp-content/uploads/spinBH2.jpg >Another black hole spinning. >At over 90% of lightspeed. >Surprise surprise OK, more evidence that Einstein's GR gravity is working as predicted. Cool. Does this mean that you finally gave up on discredited LeSage gravity?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 18:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2fm56$odl$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #724604 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >pnal >"Sorry, John, your idea that asymmetrical galactic rotation curves >support galactic precession is a non-starter. >If you think I'm wrong, well, show your evidence. " >It's self-explanatory. Get your head out So you admit you have no evidence. Gotcha.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 13:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <46d617e5-cb5a-418a-8772-629ad7cf4fbb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724612 |
MM “It's self-explanatory. Get your head out So you admit you have no evidence. Gotcha. ” Wouldn’t matter what I show to someone like you who can’t use their brain-
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 23:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2g6b1$g9m$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #724626 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > MM > “It's self-explanatory. Get your head out > > So you admit you have no evidence. Gotcha. ” > Wouldn’t matter what I show to someone like you who can’t use their brain- > If you’re the only person you can explain it to, John, then have you explained anything? -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 12:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fb73adcf-48ea-459f-bf3a-1f3b524cb082@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724604 |
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 5:24:59 AM UTC-8, john wrote: > pnal > “Sorry, John, your idea that asymmetrical galactic rotation curves support galactic precession is a non-starter. > > If you think I'm wrong, well, show your evidence. “ > > It’s self-explanatory. Get your head out You snipped the most important part... "That's how science works. You have a 'new' idea, 'you' provide the supporting evidence." Your idea is NOT self-explanatory, which is why I want to see your evidence. If YOU think it is self-explanatory, well, you should have no problem explaining it, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 13:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cdfde7e6-77d1-4719-b14c-d26207b197bd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724618 |
pnal “ If YOU think it is self-explanatory, well, you should have no problem explaining it, right? ” No. Self explanatory means you should be able to understand it without needing someone else to explain it. Right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 23:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2g6b1$g9m$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #724627 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > pnal > “ If YOU think it is self-explanatory, well, you should have no problem > explaining it, right? ” > No. > Self explanatory means you should be able to understand it without > needing someone else to explain it. Right? > And declaring it doesn’t make it so. Dodge away. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 19:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0a1ab374-0d9a-4dab-a430-81412400f133@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724627 |
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 1:21:45 PM UTC-8, john wrote: > pnal > “ If YOU think it is self-explanatory, well, you should have no problem explaining it, right? ” > No. > Self explanatory means you should be able to understand it without needing someone else to explain it. Right? Not right. You really don't have a clue, John, none at all...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 23:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9c604cf6-5d54-467b-b155-c44fa96d05f3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724694 |
pnal “Self explanatory means you should be able to understand it without needing someone else to explain it. Right? Not right. You really don't have a clue, John, none at all... ”dictionary: self-ex·plan·a·to·ry adjective easily understood; not needing explanation. "the film's title is fairly self-explanatory" synonyms: easily understood, readily comprehensible, intelligible, straightforward, unambiguous, unproblematic, accessible, clearly expressed, user-friendly, simple, self-evident, obvious, clear, crystal clear "this paragraph is largely self-explanatory" “
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 12:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e8a91184-7adc-4273-9600-96f4aa1fc6a5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724701 |
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 11:19:58 PM UTC-8, john wrote: > pnal > “Self explanatory means you should be able to understand it without needing someone else to explain it. Right? > > Not right. You really don't have a clue, John, none at all... ”dictionary: > > self-ex·plan·a·to·ry > adjective > easily understood; not needing explanation. > "the film's title is fairly self-explanatory" > synonyms: easily understood, readily comprehensible, intelligible, straightforward, unambiguous, unproblematic, accessible, clearly expressed, user-friendly, simple, self-evident, obvious, clear, crystal clear > "this paragraph is largely self-explanatory" > “ 0.5c? Because the two sides of the spinning can't observe 1.0c in their gravitational setting? Gravity at least is an "equilibrium" of sorts. Then this scale of the black hole the matter gases, would have a lot of the matter organization here with the nucleus of the galactic black hole. This would be galactic black holes so usually further apart that in the measurement terms, they are the same terms to all the orbits.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 14:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <adfb7514-0239-4b93-a7a2-6758d85c1695@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724746 |
Ross “This would be galactic black holes so usually further apart that in the measurement terms, they are the same terms to all the orbits. ” Apparently when Matter gets converted to jets it slows them down
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 11:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <69ec7ed5-07b1-4770-a6e6-35acaa6b71be@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724754 |
On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 2:25:46 PM UTC-8, john wrote: > Ross > “This would be galactic black holes > so usually further apart that in the > measurement terms, they are the > same terms to all the orbits. ” > Apparently when Matter gets converted to jets it slows them down Schech says a symmetry invariance involves a phase transition. Conservation, this is the invariant symmetry, Noether's theorem then gives effect to Shech. Then these are simply "all at rest after the jet". That's "the gravitational setting", torsion-free. Of course it has a gravitational setting, as how the galaxy formed after the jet. Gravity: always on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 09:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4f751442-ccd4-4eed-a999-5c09fd9d05a6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724694 |
pnal “....bluster...” You’ll figure it out. Keep trying! :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 19:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a8a54260-89ca-48a7-b1a1-ce714032c3d7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #724618 |
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 12:20:46 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 5:24:59 AM UTC-8, john wrote: > > pnal > > “Sorry, John, your idea that asymmetrical galactic rotation curves support galactic precession is a non-starter. > > > > If you think I'm wrong, well, show your evidence. “ > > > > It’s self-explanatory. Get your head out > > You snipped the most important part... "That's how science works. You have a 'new' idea, 'you' provide the supporting evidence." > > Your idea is NOT self-explanatory, which is why I want to see your evidence. If YOU think it is self-explanatory, well, you should have no problem explaining it, right? Science went against Einstein. That is science that doesn't work. If you can't accept order you are not doing science. You are the original dinosaur... Einstein said it himself at his last day... that atheism was his problem and he couldn't see it. Mathematical God creates gravitation. Eternally. Mitchell Raemsch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 23:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2g6b0$g9m$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #724604 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > pnal > “Sorry, John, your idea that asymmetrical galactic rotation curves > support galactic precession is a non-starter. > > If you think I'm wrong, well, show your evidence. “ > > It’s self-explanatory. Get your head out > No, John, it’s not. You who are the fan of simple explanations in plain language can’t explain yourself in plain language? For shame. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web