Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #724428 > unrolled thread

dark energy theory

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  dark energy theory Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> - 2019-01-23 07:49 -0800
    Re: dark energy theory "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-23 11:17 -0500
    Re: dark energy theory mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-23 11:43 -0800

#724428 — dark energy theory

Hi,

Explaining dark energy as an emergent phenomenon of interaction between
gravity and EM fields:

things to consider:

1. the gravitational potential of the universe

2. the overall EM field of the universe (electrostatic/electromagnetic 
charge)

3. the interaction between 1 and 2.


If EM waves are orthagonal to free space, and free space is curved due
to gravity, then the EM waves are not orthagonal to each other over
the curvature.  If there is a net electrostatic or electromagnetic
charge over that distance, there will be an attractive or repulsive
force between the EM waves, which act on the free space itself.

A way to test this, would be to take a very high powered coherent light
source and aim it along the curvature of a gravitational body, and then
when the laser is pulsed measure the gravitational force above the
laser.

Ie on earth, aim the laser from the atmosphere or space, towards the
center of earth, and then on the same line at a higher altitude, measure
the gravitational force of Earth.

If the laser is powerful enough it should very slightly reduce the local
curvature of the gravitational field, since the laser itself will curve
to match the gravitational field, which will make the EM waves of the
coherent light source non-orthogonal, resisting the curvature.

I had previously tried to explain dark energy as solely an emergent
property of gravity (ie a curvature will inherently try to expand to a
flat surface) however that fell flat no pun intended.

cheers,
Jamie

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#724430

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:49:41 -0800, Jamie M <jmorken@shaw.ca> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Explaining dark energy as an emergent phenomenon of interaction between
>gravity and EM fields:
>
>things to consider:
>
>1. the gravitational potential of the universe
>
>2. the overall EM field of the universe (electrostatic/electromagnetic 
>charge)
>
>3. the interaction between 1 and 2.
>
>
>If EM waves are orthagonal to free space, and free space is curved due
>to gravity, then the EM waves are not orthagonal to each other over
>the curvature.  If there is a net electrostatic or electromagnetic
>charge over that distance, there will be an attractive or repulsive
>force between the EM waves, which act on the free space itself.
>
>A way to test this, would be to take a very high powered coherent light
>source and aim it along the curvature of a gravitational body, and then
>when the laser is pulsed measure the gravitational force above the
>laser.
>
>Ie on earth, aim the laser from the atmosphere or space, towards the
>center of earth, and then on the same line at a higher altitude, measure
>the gravitational force of Earth.
>
>If the laser is powerful enough it should very slightly reduce the local
>curvature of the gravitational field, since the laser itself will curve
>to match the gravitational field, which will make the EM waves of the
>coherent light source non-orthogonal, resisting the curvature.
>
>I had previously tried to explain dark energy as solely an emergent
>property of gravity (ie a curvature will inherently try to expand to a
>flat surface) however that fell flat no pun intended.

Not necessarily will a curvature inherently expand a flat surface.

That thinking is myopic.  Why? Because it assumes the flat 
surface is infinite. What if the flat surface is finite, that
would mean boundaries or ends, edges.  So such a flat surface,
if then, curved could still have the same surface area by 
virtue of the ends, edges, boundaries withdrawing from their
original positions.

-- 

Everybody here likes Yours Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#724450

On Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 7:49:43 AM UTC-8, Jamie M wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Explaining dark energy as an emergent phenomenon of interaction between
> gravity and EM fields:
> 
> things to consider:
> 
> 1. the gravitational potential of the universe
> 
> 2. the overall EM field of the universe (electrostatic/electromagnetic 
> charge)
> 
> 3. the interaction between 1 and 2.
> 
> 
> If EM waves are orthagonal to free space, and free space is curved due
> to gravity, then the EM waves are not orthagonal to each other over
> the curvature.  If there is a net electrostatic or electromagnetic
> charge over that distance, there will be an attractive or repulsive
> force between the EM waves, which act on the free space itself.
> 
> A way to test this, would be to take a very high powered coherent light
> source and aim it along the curvature of a gravitational body, and then
> when the laser is pulsed measure the gravitational force above the
> laser.
> 
> Ie on earth, aim the laser from the atmosphere or space, towards the
> center of earth, and then on the same line at a higher altitude, measure
> the gravitational force of Earth.
> 
> If the laser is powerful enough it should very slightly reduce the local
> curvature of the gravitational field, since the laser itself will curve
> to match the gravitational field, which will make the EM waves of the
> coherent light source non-orthogonal, resisting the curvature.
> 
> I had previously tried to explain dark energy as solely an emergent
> property of gravity (ie a curvature will inherently try to expand to a
> flat surface) however that fell flat no pun intended.
> 
> cheers,
> Jamie

What are the strengths of the magnetic and electric fields of
force making up light? Do they have null strength?

God creates gravitation. Eternally.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web