Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #722428 > unrolled thread

AP's thoughts as of 6JAN2019//radioactivity wholescale revision//directrix of ellipse

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  AP's thoughts as of 6JAN2019//radioactivity wholescale revision//directrix of ellipse Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:58 -0800
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-07 00:01 +0000

#722428 — AP's thoughts as of 6JAN2019//radioactivity wholescale revision//directrix of ellipse

Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2019 14:21:05 -0800 (PST)

Subject: AP's thoughts as of 6JAN2019//radioactivity wholescale
 revision//directrix of ellipse
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 22:21:06 +0000

AP's thoughts as of 6JAN2019//radioactivity wholescale revision//directrix of ellipse

Alright, we need wholescale revision of radioactivity. When we come upon a rock that is 1/2radioactive element and 1/2 lead, we have got to stop this assuming nonsense that it was 100% radioactive at one time of the past and has decayed into 1/2lead. No, it is just the reverse, where at one time it was 100% lead and has grown into radioactive element by 50% content. And if we wait long enough, the remainder of 50% will grow into the radioactive substance. The mechanism is Faraday law going on inside of atoms creates magnetic monopoles by turning space into monopoles and storaged in particles called neutrons until they grow into a new proton of 840MeV with its associated new muon 105MeV to raise the atomic number of that atom one more higher. 

Alright, yesterday could not find one single percentage to match for the ellipse square, interior rectangle, exterior rectangle. So today I try the Directrix, defined as D = semimajor axis^2 / F where F is the focal point of a distance from the center, and D is a line situated parallel to semiminor axis and at a distance D from the center. 

ELLIPSE 5by2 
Semimajor axis = 5 
Semiminor axis = 2 
Foci distance from center = 4.58 using formula F^2 = semimajor axis^2 - semiminor axis^2 
Circumference = 23.013 
Area = 31.416 
Directrix is 5^2/4.58 = 5.458 

ELLIPSE 10by8 
Semimajor axis = 10 
Semiminor axis = 8 
Foci distance of 6 from center, reckoned by F^2 = semimajor^2 - semiminor^2 
Circumference = 56.723 
Area = 251.327 
Directrix is 10^2/ 6 = 16.666 

Let me see if today I can make some percentage matches. 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2019 14:45:58 -0800 (PST)

Subject: universal ellipse percentage formulas Re: AP's thoughts as of
 6JAN2019//radioactivity wholescale revision//directrix of ellipse
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 22:45:58 +0000


universal ellipse percentage formulas Re: AP's thoughts as of 6JAN2019//radioactivity wholescale revision//directrix of ellipse

On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 4:21:14 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Alright, we need wholescale revision of radioactivity. When we come upon a rock that is 1/2radioactive element and 1/2 lead, we have got to stop this assuming nonsense that it was 100% radioactive at one time of the past and has decayed into 1/2lead. No, it is just the reverse, where at one time it was 100% lead and has grown into radioactive element by 50% content. And if we wait long enough, the remainder of 50% will grow into the radioactive substance. The mechanism is Faraday law going on inside of atoms creates magnetic monopoles by turning space into monopoles and storaged in particles called neutrons until they grow into a new proton of 840MeV with its associated new muon 105MeV to raise the atomic number of that atom one more higher. 
> 
> Alright, yesterday could not find one single percentage to match for the ellipse square, interior rectangle, exterior rectangle. So today I try the Directrix, defined as D = semimajor axis^2 / F where F is the focal point of a distance from the center, and D is a line situated parallel to semiminor axis and at a distance D from the center. 
> 
> ELLIPSE 5by2 
> Semimajor axis = 5 
> Semiminor axis = 2 
> Foci distance from center = 4.58 using formula F^2 = semimajor axis^2 - semiminor axis^2 
> Circumference = 23.013 
> Area = 31.416 
> Directrix is 5^2/4.58 = 5.458 

Alright so the exterior rectangle I will use is the directrix rectangle of either 4by5.458 or 4by10.916 

The maximum interior rectangle for this ellipse is 9.06by1.692 which is area of 15.32 
And the internal square of this ellipse is 3.7by3.7 

> 
> ELLIPSE 10by8 
> Semimajor axis = 10 
> Semiminor axis = 8 
> Foci distance of 6 from center, reckoned by F^2 = semimajor^2 - semiminor^2 
> Circumference = 56.723 
> Area = 251.327 
> Directrix is 10^2/ 6 = 16.666 
> 
> Let me see if today I can make some percentage matches. 
> 

The external rectangle using the directrix is here either 16by16.666 or 16by33.33 

For this ellipse we have a maximum internal rectangle as 14.2*11.26 = 160.00 
And the internal square is 12.5by12.5 = 156.25 

So let me see if I can get universal ellipse percentage formulas. 

AP 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#722439 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 12:28:12 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Failure

No, no, no. I already told you you have to quote properly. It is supposed to be:
>>Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

And again I see you are still too dumb and stoopid to not attack me.
Remember, I know your weakness, it is your logorrhea..
You want me to defend myself by attacking back or not? Your choice...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web